Doped-up Lefty
2011-09-08 23:57:03 UTC
It's a conspiracy theory men went to the moon because it hasn't been
proven yet, and never will be.
Now that the world's top scientists have proven 9-11 was a Pentagon/
Media black op, the burden of proof is on NASA to show men went to the
moon.
When NASA claimed to have put men on the moon in 1969, Richard Nixon,
Henry Kissinger, and Donald Rumsfeld were running the government.
http://moonmovie.com/products.htm
The News Media had a central role in pulling off the 9/11 psy-op. The
operation involved airing on television a substitute, computer-
generated version of reality. It has temporarily succeeded to sell to
the world the preposterous tale of 19 young terrorists using hijacked
airliners to attack the USA. This longstanding research has
established the falseness of the images shown on LIVE TV on 9/11 – as
well as all the subsequently released video material. A large number
of casualties was also reported to generate public outrage and support
for illegal wars of aggression. However, the September Clues research
has determined that the alleged victims were fictitious identities
mostly/or entirely created within the digital realm. The 9/11 hoax -
and the phony "War on Terror" - are definitively exposed by method
revealed.
ENTER SITE
http://www.septemberclues.info/
ALL RESEARCH ARTICLES
The Power Of Imagery
Television is - and has always been - a Weapon of Mass Distraction.
The power of TV-imagery was the driving force behind the 9/11
deception.
Whenever a major news event is reported by the mainstream media, it
will invariably be illustrated with photographs or videos in order to
convey to the public some visual impressions of the event. Undeniably,
the imagery connected with any given news story enhances our emotional
relation to it. The way we relate to news imagery has an almost
hypnotic effect on our psyche: we have come to consider the visuals of
any given news story as proof of that news story’s authenticity. This
is truly a ‘weak spot’ of our brains’ readiness for critical-thinking.
Thus follows, unfortunately, that to challenge the authenticity of a
catastrophic event shown on Live TV is way beyond what most people are
willing to contemplate. However, the time has come for everyone to
call television by its most appropriate, military-sounding name:
"Weapon of Mass Distraction".
The 9/11 psyop relied foremostly on that ‘weak spot’ of ours. We all
fell for the images we saw on TV at the time – understandably so, as
the sheer horror of the proposed imagery generated a wall of outrage
and fear – thick enough to discourage any critical review of it. In
hindsight, we can only wonder why so few questioned the absurd TV
coverage proposed by all the major networks. The picture at left shows
a moment (at 8:59AM) of the four synchronized TV broadcasts of ABC,
CBS, NBC and FOX: yet another indication that the 9/11 TV "LIVE"
broadcasts were managed by one single, centralized studio. (see my
audio analysis in September Clues E)
WHAT TELEVISION VIEWERS SAW ON 9/11
The 9/11 TV imagery (of the crucial morning events) was just a
computer-animated, pre-fabricated movie. It featured for the most part
what were meant to be “chopper shots” of the smoking towers - and very
little else. The sum total of “Action Shots” (“Planecrash” and “Tower
collapses”) amounted to little over 30secs of the entire morning's TV
broadcasts ! Needless to say, much as the rest of the animation movie,
none of these “Action Shots” depicted any sort of reality. Now, it may
be difficult for many to understand why the 9/11 plotters needed to
fake even the tower collapses; yet this was undoubtedly the most
crucial aspect of the entire operation - and needs to be fully
understood in its plain logic: The unprecedented WTC demolition job
was far too risky an affair to be shown on LIVE TV - (or to let any
amateur cameraman capture it on film). The 9/11 conspirators had no
intention whatsoever to offer such a "pyrotechnical" spectacle to
world scrutiny - just imagine how unspeakably foolish this would have
been. Thus, in all probability, the oldest trick in the manuals of
covert military ops was used: smokescreens. More recent technology
deactivated temporarily all cameras within sight of the area. In
reality, the towers were most likely enveloped in thick smoke
(military obscurants) as they collapsed - and no real footage exists
of that brief event. Thankfully - for all normal people of this world
- the 9/11 planners hired a poorly skilled animation crew : in their
efforts to simulate reality, their crass 'artistry' and countless
mistakes provide ample and repeatable proof of the trickery - forever
engraved in the TV archives.
These images are an intolerable insult to human intelligence :
A REAL PLANE CRASH ?___________________________A REAL SKYSCRAPER
COLLAPSE ?
See: Detailed Analyses of Airplane Animations
See: Detailed Analyses of Collapse Animations
WHY FAKE THE NEWS BROADCASTS ? The 9/11 TV broadcasts were designed to
‘sell’ a fictitious terror attack to the world– by replacing the real-
life events of the day (the WTC demolitions) with fake imagery. The
official story was quite surreal - as were the TV images of the day
and the preposterous tale of 19 kids roundly outfoxing the US Air
Defense. It is essential to judge with one's own eyes the broadcasts
actually aired by ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC and CNN.
WHAT ABOUT THE "AMATEUR" VIDEOS ? All the other videos (endlessly
replayed on TV) were released only later. They have all been
extensively analyzed by scores of video analysts; each and every video
snippet of "amateur imagery" has been methodically dissected and
compared - and empirically proved to be nothing else than computer-
generated fabrications.
HOW WERE PRIVATE VIDEOS IMPEDED ? In order for the 9/11 TV-deception
to succeed, full visual control of the Manhattan area had to be in
place. The existence of EMP/HERF technology is undisputable: only the
hypothesis of it being used on 9/11 remains unverifiable. It is,
however, a reasonable postulation supported by a series of electronic
blackouts which occurred in NYC that morning. In any event, the logic
of using EMP/HERF holds water and effectively explains the ruse with
disarming simplicity: NO private photography of the real-life events
was allowed: thus, the imagery aired by the TV networks feared no
comparison and was passed off as reality.
proven yet, and never will be.
Now that the world's top scientists have proven 9-11 was a Pentagon/
Media black op, the burden of proof is on NASA to show men went to the
moon.
When NASA claimed to have put men on the moon in 1969, Richard Nixon,
Henry Kissinger, and Donald Rumsfeld were running the government.
http://moonmovie.com/products.htm
The News Media had a central role in pulling off the 9/11 psy-op. The
operation involved airing on television a substitute, computer-
generated version of reality. It has temporarily succeeded to sell to
the world the preposterous tale of 19 young terrorists using hijacked
airliners to attack the USA. This longstanding research has
established the falseness of the images shown on LIVE TV on 9/11 – as
well as all the subsequently released video material. A large number
of casualties was also reported to generate public outrage and support
for illegal wars of aggression. However, the September Clues research
has determined that the alleged victims were fictitious identities
mostly/or entirely created within the digital realm. The 9/11 hoax -
and the phony "War on Terror" - are definitively exposed by method
revealed.
ENTER SITE
http://www.septemberclues.info/
ALL RESEARCH ARTICLES
The Power Of Imagery
Television is - and has always been - a Weapon of Mass Distraction.
The power of TV-imagery was the driving force behind the 9/11
deception.
Whenever a major news event is reported by the mainstream media, it
will invariably be illustrated with photographs or videos in order to
convey to the public some visual impressions of the event. Undeniably,
the imagery connected with any given news story enhances our emotional
relation to it. The way we relate to news imagery has an almost
hypnotic effect on our psyche: we have come to consider the visuals of
any given news story as proof of that news story’s authenticity. This
is truly a ‘weak spot’ of our brains’ readiness for critical-thinking.
Thus follows, unfortunately, that to challenge the authenticity of a
catastrophic event shown on Live TV is way beyond what most people are
willing to contemplate. However, the time has come for everyone to
call television by its most appropriate, military-sounding name:
"Weapon of Mass Distraction".
The 9/11 psyop relied foremostly on that ‘weak spot’ of ours. We all
fell for the images we saw on TV at the time – understandably so, as
the sheer horror of the proposed imagery generated a wall of outrage
and fear – thick enough to discourage any critical review of it. In
hindsight, we can only wonder why so few questioned the absurd TV
coverage proposed by all the major networks. The picture at left shows
a moment (at 8:59AM) of the four synchronized TV broadcasts of ABC,
CBS, NBC and FOX: yet another indication that the 9/11 TV "LIVE"
broadcasts were managed by one single, centralized studio. (see my
audio analysis in September Clues E)
WHAT TELEVISION VIEWERS SAW ON 9/11
The 9/11 TV imagery (of the crucial morning events) was just a
computer-animated, pre-fabricated movie. It featured for the most part
what were meant to be “chopper shots” of the smoking towers - and very
little else. The sum total of “Action Shots” (“Planecrash” and “Tower
collapses”) amounted to little over 30secs of the entire morning's TV
broadcasts ! Needless to say, much as the rest of the animation movie,
none of these “Action Shots” depicted any sort of reality. Now, it may
be difficult for many to understand why the 9/11 plotters needed to
fake even the tower collapses; yet this was undoubtedly the most
crucial aspect of the entire operation - and needs to be fully
understood in its plain logic: The unprecedented WTC demolition job
was far too risky an affair to be shown on LIVE TV - (or to let any
amateur cameraman capture it on film). The 9/11 conspirators had no
intention whatsoever to offer such a "pyrotechnical" spectacle to
world scrutiny - just imagine how unspeakably foolish this would have
been. Thus, in all probability, the oldest trick in the manuals of
covert military ops was used: smokescreens. More recent technology
deactivated temporarily all cameras within sight of the area. In
reality, the towers were most likely enveloped in thick smoke
(military obscurants) as they collapsed - and no real footage exists
of that brief event. Thankfully - for all normal people of this world
- the 9/11 planners hired a poorly skilled animation crew : in their
efforts to simulate reality, their crass 'artistry' and countless
mistakes provide ample and repeatable proof of the trickery - forever
engraved in the TV archives.
These images are an intolerable insult to human intelligence :
A REAL PLANE CRASH ?___________________________A REAL SKYSCRAPER
COLLAPSE ?
See: Detailed Analyses of Airplane Animations
See: Detailed Analyses of Collapse Animations
WHY FAKE THE NEWS BROADCASTS ? The 9/11 TV broadcasts were designed to
‘sell’ a fictitious terror attack to the world– by replacing the real-
life events of the day (the WTC demolitions) with fake imagery. The
official story was quite surreal - as were the TV images of the day
and the preposterous tale of 19 kids roundly outfoxing the US Air
Defense. It is essential to judge with one's own eyes the broadcasts
actually aired by ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC and CNN.
WHAT ABOUT THE "AMATEUR" VIDEOS ? All the other videos (endlessly
replayed on TV) were released only later. They have all been
extensively analyzed by scores of video analysts; each and every video
snippet of "amateur imagery" has been methodically dissected and
compared - and empirically proved to be nothing else than computer-
generated fabrications.
HOW WERE PRIVATE VIDEOS IMPEDED ? In order for the 9/11 TV-deception
to succeed, full visual control of the Manhattan area had to be in
place. The existence of EMP/HERF technology is undisputable: only the
hypothesis of it being used on 9/11 remains unverifiable. It is,
however, a reasonable postulation supported by a series of electronic
blackouts which occurred in NYC that morning. In any event, the logic
of using EMP/HERF holds water and effectively explains the ruse with
disarming simplicity: NO private photography of the real-life events
was allowed: thus, the imagery aired by the TV networks feared no
comparison and was passed off as reality.