weary flake
2020-06-22 03:57:17 UTC
BBC Music magazine has the worst review of CD players I've
seen. It praises the Cambridge Audio Topaz CD10 as an
entry level super value budget priced 200[pounds] CD player,
with real punch and authority, yet the review discloses
that it DOESN'T HAVE GAPLESS PLAYBACK. "Fine for pop CDs,
but distracting for some classical music recordings". The
only way to be a worse reviewer is to not disclose it's
failure to play gapless. Cambridge produces the worst
engineered CD player I've ever heard of, yet receives a
positive review.
The other two reviews on the page have praises for CD
players from 845[pounds] and 6,000[pounds] and are supposed
to have different sound including breadth of the soundstage
and instrument positioning. What good is a CD player that
alters soundstage, that sounds like a rip-off for
6,000[pounds].
I wish American Record Guide reviewed audio equipment.
seen. It praises the Cambridge Audio Topaz CD10 as an
entry level super value budget priced 200[pounds] CD player,
with real punch and authority, yet the review discloses
that it DOESN'T HAVE GAPLESS PLAYBACK. "Fine for pop CDs,
but distracting for some classical music recordings". The
only way to be a worse reviewer is to not disclose it's
failure to play gapless. Cambridge produces the worst
engineered CD player I've ever heard of, yet receives a
positive review.
The other two reviews on the page have praises for CD
players from 845[pounds] and 6,000[pounds] and are supposed
to have different sound including breadth of the soundstage
and instrument positioning. What good is a CD player that
alters soundstage, that sounds like a rip-off for
6,000[pounds].
I wish American Record Guide reviewed audio equipment.