WHY CAN'T THE COMMON ATHEIST

.

just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

John Locke

2018-11-08 00:21:46 UTC

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup". If you don't like your
nonsensical religious views being challenged and debunked , then why
don't you haunt one of the religious newsgroups instead ?

b***@m.nu

2018-11-08 00:57:31 UTC

On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 16:21:46 -0800, John Locke

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup". If you don't like your

It knows, it knows all too well. But it wants to make sure people can
see and hear it. Thus defines a troll..

Post by John Locke
nonsensical religious views being challenged and debunked , then why
don't you haunt one of the religious newsgroups instead ?

Because it does not even believe in fairies, it just says that it does
so it can be more troll like. It knows a theist will get more
responses so that is the profession it has chosen. It is after all a
troll

duke

2018-11-08 22:34:07 UTC

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

By your definition then, we are the only ones that provide positive evidence
to the ng.

Post by John Locke
If you don't like your
nonsensical religious views being challenged and debunked , then why
don't you haunt one of the religious newsgroups instead ?

I love hearing the atheists cry.

the dukester, American-American

*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

2018-11-08 23:52:52 UTC

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

By your definition then, we are the only ones that provide positive evidence
to the ng.

Post by John Locke
If you don't like your
nonsensical religious views being challenged and debunked , then why
don't you haunt one of the religious newsgroups instead ?

I love hearing the atheists cry.
the dukester, American-American
*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

i wonder if john knows i'm not a christian

John Locke

2018-11-09 00:35:00 UTC

Post by %

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

By your definition then, we are the only ones that provide positive evidence
to the ng.

Post by John Locke
If you don't like your
nonsensical religious views being challenged and debunked , then why
don't you haunt one of the religious newsgroups instead ?

I love hearing the atheists cry.
the dukester, American-American
*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

i wonder if john knows i'm not a christian

..well, Pee Scent...that's one point in your favor. I'll give you a
few more if you're a Satanist, Pastafarian, Wiccan or Buddhist !
..hell, I'll even give you a point if you're a Cockroachian !

m***@gmail.com

2018-11-14 00:19:02 UTC

Post by %

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

By your definition then, we are the only ones that provide positive evidence
to the ng.

Post by John Locke
If you don't like your
nonsensical religious views being challenged and debunked , then why
don't you haunt one of the religious newsgroups instead ?

I love hearing the atheists cry.
the dukester, American-American
*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

i wonder if john knows i'm not a christian

..well, Pee Scent...that's one point in your favor. I'll give you a
few more if you're a Satanist, Pastafarian, Wiccan or Buddhist !
..hell, I'll even give you a point if you're a Cockroachian !

Cody's the only member of the Cockroachian Pocket Church.

m***@gmail.com

2018-11-14 00:16:39 UTC

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

By your definition then, we are the only ones that provide positive evidence
to the ng.

Post by John Locke
If you don't like your
nonsensical religious views being challenged and debunked , then why
don't you haunt one of the religious newsgroups instead ?

I love hearing the atheists cry.

That means that you're not just a masochist, Earl. You're a sado-masochist.

duke

2018-11-14 23:29:10 UTC

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

By your definition then, we are the only ones that provide positive evidence
to the ng.

Post by John Locke
If you don't like your
nonsensical religious views being challenged and debunked , then why
don't you haunt one of the religious newsgroups instead ?

I love hearing the atheists cry.

That means that you're not just a masochist, Earl. You're a sado-masochist.

Grey say's it's your evil nature.

the dukester, American-American

*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

duke

2018-11-09 06:59:56 UTC

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

the dukester, American-American

*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

Kevrob

2018-11-09 22:09:19 UTC

Post by duke
It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

This is absolutely, positively, wrong.

Atheists come here to discuss any and all aspects of our
lives. People interested in learning about atheism come
to ask us questions. Some of those folks are theists. We
don't mind that, within reason. Those who show up to start
debates about atheism v theism are just prselytizing for
their religioous points of view. They are preaching. They
are flaming. They aren't welcome, evein if, long ago, someone
invited them to visit the group. Any such invitation would come
with the proviso that the FAQ and charter be observed.

http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq

People who want those debates can visit this group:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/atheism-v-christianity

...or this group

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/Atheism-vs-Christianity

...and there are probab;y web forums for that sort of thing.

---
Kevin R
a.a #2310

duke

2018-11-12 22:51:49 UTC

Post by Kevrob

Post by duke
It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

This is absolutely, positively, wrong.
Atheists come here to discuss any and all aspects of our
lives.

And are in need of the counter balance.

the dukester, American-American

*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

v***@gmail.com

2018-11-14 07:04:11 UTC

Post by Kevrob

Post by duke
It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

This is absolutely, positively, wrong.
Atheists come here to discuss any and all aspects of our
lives. People interested in learning about atheism come
to ask us questions. Some of those folks are theists. We
don't mind that, within reason. Those who show up to start
debates about atheism v theism are just prselytizing for
their religioous points of view. They are preaching. They
are flaming. They aren't welcome, evein if, long ago, someone
invited them to visit the group. Any such invitation would come
with the proviso that the FAQ and charter be observed.
http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/atheism-v-christianity
...or this group
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/Atheism-vs-Christianity
...and there are probab;y web forums for that sort of thing.
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310

We don't need your welcome.

John Locke

2018-11-12 18:33:00 UTC

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

..no,it's not. And there's no discussion needed. We know the
probability of your god existing is near zero. The "discussion" only
comes up when religious trolls attempt to monger their god nonsense in
the newsgroup.

Christopher A. Lee

2018-11-12 18:53:01 UTC

On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:33:00 -0800, John Locke

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

What a stupid, pathetic, in-your-face liar.

Why does the retard imagine that the putative existence of some
magical superbeing from the mythology of somebody else's religion,
should be an issue for us?

Post by John Locke
..no,it's not. And there's no discussion needed. We know the
probability of your god existing is near zero. The "discussion" only
comes up when religious trolls attempt to monger their god nonsense in
the newsgroup.

Like Sir Pukelot aka Blubba the Gut.

duke

2018-11-13 15:45:47 UTC

Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:33:00 -0800, John Locke

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

What a stupid, pathetic, in-your-face liar.
Why does the retard imagine that the putative existence of some
magical superbeing from the mythology of somebody else's religion,
should be an issue for us?

By virtue of your existence. Thanks be to God. And the creator will judge you
for the way you used your opportunity.

the dukester, American-American

*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

Don Martin

2018-11-12 21:16:58 UTC

On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:33:00 -0800, John Locke

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

Apparently, Douche, in line with his other public shortcomings, is
incapable of comprehending the _name_ of this newsgroup.

--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.

John Baker

2018-11-12 23:08:17 UTC

On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:16:58 -0500, Don Martin

Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:33:00 -0800, John Locke

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

Apparently, Douche, in line with his other public shortcomings, is
incapable of comprehending the _name_ of this newsgroup.

I suspect Earl would have trouble comprehending 'sit', 'fetch' and
'roll over.'

AA #1898
Giver of No Fucks
Keeper of the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch

duke

2018-11-13 15:48:11 UTC

Post by John Baker
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:16:58 -0500, Don Martin

Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:33:00 -0800, John Locke

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

Apparently, Douche, in line with his other public shortcomings, is
incapable of comprehending the _name_ of this newsgroup.

I suspect Earl would have trouble comprehending 'sit', 'fetch' and
'roll over.'

The language of the defeated.

the dukester, American-American

*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

John Locke

2018-11-13 17:51:35 UTC

Post by John Baker
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:16:58 -0500, Don Martin

Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:33:00 -0800, John Locke

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

Apparently, Douche, in line with his other public shortcomings, is
incapable of comprehending the _name_ of this newsgroup.

I suspect Earl would have trouble comprehending 'sit', 'fetch' and
'roll over.'

..well hell, this is somehitng we can actually test:

OK Earl...listen up..."sit"..."fetch the ball"..."roll over"...now
report the results in the space provided below:
________________________________________________

_________________________________________________

John Locke

2018-11-14 00:31:21 UTC

On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:10:43 -0500, Don Martin

Post by John Baker
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:16:58 -0500, Don Martin

Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:33:00 -0800, John Locke

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

Apparently, Douche, in line with his other public shortcomings, is
incapable of comprehending the _name_ of this newsgroup.

I suspect Earl would have trouble comprehending 'sit', 'fetch' and
'roll over.'

Defensive on his part. If he ever managed to roll over, he'd be in
the Gulf within minutes.

well, if they don't mind the oil slick, twould be a hardy carrion
feast for the various local inhabitants of the Gulf.

Don Martin

2018-11-14 23:37:26 UTC

On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:31:21 -0800, John Locke

Post by John Locke
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:10:43 -0500, Don Martin

Post by John Baker
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:16:58 -0500, Don Martin

Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:33:00 -0800, John Locke

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

Apparently, Douche, in line with his other public shortcomings, is
incapable of comprehending the _name_ of this newsgroup.

I suspect Earl would have trouble comprehending 'sit', 'fetch' and
'roll over.'

Defensive on his part. If he ever managed to roll over, he'd be in
the Gulf within minutes.

well, if they don't mind the oil slick, twould be a hardy carrion
feast for the various local inhabitants of the Gulf.

Not only hardy, but heady, with 300 calories per cubic inch.

--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.

Cloud Hobbit

2018-11-14 21:13:58 UTC

Defensive on his part. If he ever managed to roll over, he'd be in

the Gulf within minutes.
- show quoted text -
________________

And soon there'd be a group of people gathered crying: "Save the whale."

John Locke

2018-11-14 21:58:21 UTC

On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 13:13:58 -0800 (PST), Cloud Hobbit

Defensive on his part. If he ever managed to roll over, he'd be in

the Gulf within minutes.
- show quoted text -
________________
And soon there'd be a group of people gathered crying: "Save the whale."

...and one little boy says "Daddy, there really are albino whales !".

2018-11-14 22:08:09 UTC

Post by John Locke
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 13:13:58 -0800 (PST), Cloud Hobbit

Defensive on his part. If he ever managed to roll over, he'd be in

the Gulf within minutes.
- show quoted text -
________________
And soon there'd be a group of people gathered crying: "Save the whale."

...and one little boy says "Daddy, there really are albino whales !".

and you can prove this happened , right

duke

2018-11-13 15:47:22 UTC

Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:33:00 -0800, John Locke

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

Apparently, Douche, in line with his other public shortcomings, is
incapable of comprehending the _name_ of this newsgroup.

I know the name. It's a place for the pros and cons for God's existence.
Shirley you're not claiming you're right without a discussion.

the dukester, American-American

*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

linuxgal

2018-11-13 16:19:58 UTC

Post by duke
I know the name. It's a place for the pros and cons for God's existence.

You certainly represent the con of God's existence.

duke

2018-11-13 20:30:34 UTC

Post by linuxgal

Post by duke
I know the name. It's a place for the pros and cons for God's existence.

You certainly represent the con of God's existence.

"Con" is a great position to be on re atheist beliefs.

the dukester, American-American

*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

duke

2018-11-13 15:36:44 UTC

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

We're here in creation. That takes God. It's mandatory. It's 100% guaranteed
that you cannot make a case for there being no God.

the dukester, American-American

*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

John Locke

2018-11-14 01:23:18 UTC

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

We're here in creation.

...there's no creation, no design, no purpose..we're here do to the
natural processes of nature. We live, we die, we cease to
exist...that's it.

Post by duke
That takes God.

...nope. We don't need no stinking god !

Post by duke
It's mandatory.

...nope. Everything is natural and uncaused. There's no god involved.

Post by duke
It's 100% guaranteed>that you cannot make a case for there being no God.

...we've explained to you many thousands of times why the probability
for the existence of your god is near zero. BUT, your're not
listeneing !

2018-11-14 13:45:11 UTC

Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:33:00 -0800, John Locke

Post by b***@m.nu
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 16:21:46 -0800, John Locke

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's

existence - yes or

Post by Christopher A. Lee

Post by b***@m.nu
no.

We're here in creation.

...there's no creation, no design, no purpose..we're here do to the

Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:33:00 -0800, John Locke

Post by b***@m.nu
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 16:21:46 -0800, John Locke

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's

existence - yes or

Post by Christopher A. Lee

Post by b***@m.nu
no.

We're here in creation.

...there's no creation, no design, no purpose..we're here do to the
natural processes of nature. We live, we die, we cease to
exist...that's it.

Post by Christopher A. Lee
That takes God.

...nope. We don't need no stinking god !

Post by Christopher A. Lee
It's mandatory.
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:33:00 -0800, John Locke

Post by b***@m.nu
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 16:21:46 -0800, John Locke

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's

existence - yes or

Post by Christopher A. Lee

Post by b***@m.nu
no.

We're here in creation.

...there's no creation, no design, no purpose..we're here do to the
natural processes of nature. We live, we die, we cease to
exist...that's it.

Post by Christopher A. Lee
That takes God.

...nope. We don't need no stinking god !

Post by Christopher A. Lee
It's mandatory.

...nope. Everything is natural and uncaused. There's no god involved.

Post by Christopher A. Lee
It's 100% guaranteed>that you cannot make a case for there being no God.

...we've explained to you many thousands of times why the probability
for the existence of your god is near zero. BUT, your're not
listeneing !
...nope. Everything is natural and uncaused. There's no god involved.

Post by Christopher A. Lee
It's 100% guaranteed>that you cannot make a case for there being no God.

...we've explained to you many thousands of times why the probability
for the existence of your god is near zero. BUT, your're not
listeneing !

cesses of nature. We live, we die, we cease to

Post by John Locke
exist...that's it.

Post by Christopher A. Lee
That takes God.

...nope. We don't need no stinking god !

Post by Christopher A. Lee
It's mandatory.

...nope. Everything is natural and uncaused. There's no god involved.

Post by Christopher A. Lee
It's 100% guaranteed>that you cannot make a case for there being no God.

...we've explained to you many thousands of times why the probability
for the existence of your god is near zero. BUT, your're not
listeneing !

duke

2018-11-14 23:30:28 UTC

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

We're here in creation.

...there's no creation, no design, no purpose..we're here do to the
natural processes of nature. We live, we die, we cease to
exist...that's it.

God is nature.

Post by duke
That takes God.

...nope. We don't need no stinking god !

Post by duke
It's mandatory.

...nope. Everything is natural and uncaused. There's no god involved.

Post by duke
It's 100% guaranteed>that you cannot make a case for there being no God.

...we've explained to you many thousands of times why the probability
for the existence of your god is near zero. BUT, your're not
listeneing !

You've never even come close to making your point.

the dukester, American-American

*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

Cloud Hobbit

2018-11-15 07:56:57 UTC

Post by duke
You've never even come close to making your point.

- show quoted text -

And you think you have Jabba?

duke

2018-11-15 21:02:16 UTC

On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 23:56:57 -0800 (PST), Cloud Hobbit

Post by Cloud Hobbit

Post by duke
You've never even come close to making your point.

- show quoted text -
And you think you have Jabba?

Is he your cousin?

the dukester, American-American

*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

m***@gmail.com

2018-11-14 00:25:35 UTC

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

No. Alt.atheism is an atheist newsgroup intended for atheists, not theist
trolls like you, EarlJames Weber. Reread the current alt.atheism FAQ/Charter.

http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq

duke

2018-11-14 23:30:58 UTC

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

..Pee Scent...you've forgotten, again, that this is an atheist
newsgroup and that it is YOU and your consortium of theist misfits
who are "trolling up this newsgroup".

It's not an atheist ng. It's an ng for discussion of God's existence - yes or
no.

No. Alt.atheism is an atheist newsgroup intended for atheists,

Breaks the law.

the dukester, American-American

*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

Amazing Answers

2018-11-12 10:45:00 UTC

Post by %
just do his not believing without fighting about it ,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it
\

no it's not. it's a from called alt.atheism and not alt.atheists. The guy who created alt.atheism just said it's for discussing atheism.

Davej

2018-11-08 01:04:24 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

John Locke

2018-11-08 02:32:39 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

..I don't think there is an alt.jesus newsgroup. And the groups that
are out there such as alt.fan.jesus look pretty dead. He needs
to try a web based forum such as https://www.talkjesus.com/.
Of course, he won't, because half the fun of him posting in
alt.atheism is getting his butt kicked on a daily basis.

b***@m.nu

2018-11-08 02:52:35 UTC

On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 18:32:39 -0800, John Locke

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

and thus defines a masochist...

duke

2018-11-09 07:02:41 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

the dukester, American-American

*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

John Locke

2018-11-09 11:47:13 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

aaa

2018-11-09 14:51:35 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

Before you can deny the existence of God, you need to define God first.
Since God can't be defined, you have no ground to deny God's existence.

You can't deny the existence of anything when you don't even know what
exactly you are denying. By being an atheist, your utter ignorance of
God makes your blind denial illogical and irrelevant.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

John Locke

2018-11-09 18:12:56 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

Before you can deny the existence of God, you need to define God first.
Since God can't be defined, you have no ground to deny God's existence.
You can't deny the existence of anything when you don't even know what
exactly you are denying. By being an atheist, your utter ignorance of
God makes your blind denial illogical and irrelevant.

...we can't deny or define what isn't there. Atheists simply lack
belief in the existence of your god based on the fact that there's no
evidence and that no god crap has ever had to be factored into science
to explain nature. You seem confused. Atheism is very easy to
understand but the it still appears to be beyond your grasp.

MikeYost

2018-11-09 18:15:00 UTC

Post by John Locke
...we can't deny or define what isn't there.

So you admit you are not qualified

first off, what is dark matter

secondly, what is up with quantum entanglement?

m***@gmail.com

2018-11-14 00:45:20 UTC

Post by MikeYost

Post by John Locke
...we can't deny or define what isn't there.

So you admit you are not qualified
first off, what is dark matter
secondly, what is up with quantum entanglement?

Daek matter is what fills your skull. It doesn't have to just be in outer space
in your case. It's making your skull expand and one day it will explode.

hleopold

2018-11-14 03:56:26 UTC

Post by MikeYost

...we can't deny or define what isn't there.

So you admit you are not qualified
first off, what is dark matter
secondly, what is up with quantum entanglement?

Daek matter is what fills your skull. It doesn't have to just be in outer space
in your case. It's making your skull expand and one day it will explode.

Considering that many physicists think that dark matter is its’ own
antimatter that explosion might be rather spectacular to see. Just don’t
stand too close, it would not only be messy but highly radioactive. Remember
to wear your lead undies. ;-)

--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness (remove gene to email)

"We used to be afraid of comets. Now it's their turn." The Register

m***@gmail.com

2018-11-15 05:05:13 UTC

Post by MikeYost

...we can't deny or define what isn't there.

So you admit you are not qualified
first off, what is dark matter
secondly, what is up with quantum entanglement?

Dark matter is what fills your skull. It doesn't have to just be in
outer space in your case. It's making your skull expand and one day
it will explode.

Thanks for the reminder. I wonder if the explosion will create a
new stupid Universe. ;-D

aaa

2018-11-09 19:52:52 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

Before you can deny the existence of God, you need to define God first.
Since God can't be defined, you have no ground to deny God's existence.
You can't deny the existence of anything when you don't even know what
exactly you are denying. By being an atheist, your utter ignorance of
God makes your blind denial illogical and irrelevant.

...we can't deny or define what isn't there.

Where is there? Can you define there?

No, you can't. You have absolutely no idea what the fuck you are talking
about.

When you don't even know what you are talking about, how can you deny
anything?

Atheists simply lack

Post by John Locke
belief in the existence of your god based on the fact that there's no
evidence and that no god crap has ever had to be factored into science
to explain nature. You seem confused.

No, you are the one who is confused. There is no need to take political
belief or social morality into consideration when talking about science
either. That doesn't mean that there is no political belief or social
morality existing in this world. Your scientific view is quite limited
to explain the world we are living in.

Atheism is very easy to

Post by John Locke
understand but the it still appears to be beyond your grasp.

You are the one who needs to realize the utter ignorance of atheism.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Cloud Hobbit

2018-11-12 10:39:10 UTC

Post by aaa
You are the one who needs to realize the utter ignorance of atheism.

- show quoted text -

It doesn't matter where "there" is, we don't believe in a God.

We don't need evidence to not believe because as far as you or anyone else has been able to prove there is no evidence of a God to believe in.

As far as knowing anything about God it seems you are as clueless as you think we are.

Not that it matters what the fuck you believe, we don't believe in any god. It doesn't matter if yo think we're wrong, we don't care.
We don't believe in Satan either as he's part of the package.

Now piss off.

aaa

2018-11-12 17:17:14 UTC

Post by Cloud Hobbit

Post by aaa
You are the one who needs to realize the utter ignorance of
atheism.

- show quoted text -
It doesn't matter where "there" is, we don't believe in a God.

Blind denial.

Post by Cloud Hobbit
We don't need evidence to not believe because as far as you or anyone
else has been able to prove there is no evidence of a God to believe
in.

Blind denial.

Post by Cloud Hobbit
As far as knowing anything about God it seems you are as clueless as you think we are.

Blind denial.

Post by Cloud Hobbit
Not that it matters what the fuck you believe, we don't believe in
any god. It doesn't matter if yo think we're wrong, we don't care.
We don't believe in Satan either as he's part of the package.
Now piss off.

That's still just your blind denial. You have nothing except your
willful ignorance.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

m***@gmail.com

2018-11-14 01:11:50 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

Before you can deny the existence of God, you need to define God first.
Since God can't be defined, you have no ground to deny God's existence.
You can't deny the existence of anything when you don't even know what
exactly you are denying. By being an atheist, your utter ignorance of
God makes your blind denial illogical and irrelevant.

...we can't deny or define what isn't there.

Where is there? Can you define there?

There is anyplace that isn't here.

Post by aaa
No, you can't. You have absolutely no idea what the fuck you are talking
about. Define there,

You mean you couldn't.

Post by aaa
When you don't even know what you are talking about, how can you deny
anything?

Guess again, bozo.

Post by aaa
Atheists simply lack

Post by John Locke
belief in the existence of your god based on the fact that there's no
evidence and that no god crap has ever had to be factored into science
to explain nature. You seem confused.

No, it isn't. You simply can't understand any kind of science. Science
frightens you. You have to invent something to chase it away. You've failed.

Post by aaa
Atheism is very easy to

Post by John Locke
understand but the it still appears to be beyond your grasp.

This is where you start babbling nonsense. You're a real nowhere man.
You aren't here, there or anywhere. And, you don't define atheism.

Post by aaa
You are the one who needs to realize the utter ignorance of atheism.

You're afraid of atheism. You have to redefine it to chase it away. It's
still here, despite you. And, there's nothing you can do about it.

Fact is, you have to redefine anything that you don't understand. You
have to redefine a lot of things. They're all still here, no matter
what you try to make them mean. You cannot make them go away. They're
here, there and all over. You're surrounded by them. You can't escape
reality. What you push is nowhere. Reality is everywhere.

Now, you'll have to come up with something new, since your old crap is nowhere.

MikeYost

2018-11-14 01:20:31 UTC

Post by aaa
Science
frightens you. You have to invent something to chase it away.

is that what you have to tell (your puppets) yourself?

is that how you have managed to (so far) live with yourself???

aaa

2018-11-14 17:52:59 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

Before you can deny the existence of God, you need to define God first.
Since God can't be defined, you have no ground to deny God's existence.
You can't deny the existence of anything when you don't even know what
exactly you are denying. By being an atheist, your utter ignorance of
God makes your blind denial illogical and irrelevant.

...we can't deny or define what isn't there.

Where is there? Can you define there?

There is anyplace that isn't here.

Wrong answer.

Post by aaa
No, you can't. You have absolutely no idea what the fuck you are talking
about. Define there,

You mean you couldn't.

Wrong answer again. I'm obviously different from you.

Post by aaa
When you don't even know what you are talking about, how can you deny
anything?

Guess again, bozo.

You failed to answer the question again.

Post by aaa
Atheists simply lack

Post by John Locke
belief in the existence of your god based on the fact that there's no
evidence and that no god crap has ever had to be factored into science
to explain nature. You seem confused.

No, it isn't. You simply can't understand any kind of science. Science
frightens you. You have to invent something to chase it away. You've failed.

The fact remains your science can't answer any philosophical question.

Post by aaa
Atheism is very easy to

Post by John Locke
understand but the it still appears to be beyond your grasp.

This is where you start babbling nonsense. You're a real nowhere man.
You aren't here, there or anywhere. And, you don't define atheism.

Post by aaa
You are the one who needs to realize the utter ignorance of atheism.

You're afraid of atheism. You have to redefine it to chase it away. It's
still here, despite you. And, there's nothing you can do about it.
Fact is, you have to redefine anything that you don't understand. You
have to redefine a lot of things. They're all still here, no matter
what you try to make them mean. You cannot make them go away. They're
here, there and all over. You're surrounded by them. You can't escape
reality. What you push is nowhere. Reality is everywhere.
Now, you'll have to come up with something new, since your old crap is nowhere.

You still fail to address my actual point. All you can have is just
blind denial.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Peter Pan

2018-11-11 23:58:23 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

Before you can deny the existence of God, you need to define God first.
Since God can't be defined, you have no ground to deny God's existence.
You can't deny the existence of anything when you don't even know what
exactly you are denying. By being an atheist, your utter ignorance of
God makes your blind denial illogical and irrelevant.

So you have proven God with nothing more than words. Wow.

But, aaa, before you can assert the existence of god, you
need to define god first. Since god can't be defined,
you have no grounds to believe in god's existence, let
alone proselytize about god.

Sorry, little buddy. You live by blind denial, you die
by blind denial.

aaa

2018-11-12 04:44:53 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

Before you can deny the existence of God, you need to define God first.
Since God can't be defined, you have no ground to deny God's existence.
You can't deny the existence of anything when you don't even know what
exactly you are denying. By being an atheist, your utter ignorance of
God makes your blind denial illogical and irrelevant.

So you have proven God with nothing more than words. Wow.
But, aaa, before you can assert the existence of god, you
need to define god first. Since god can't be defined,
you have no grounds to believe in god's existence, let
alone proselytize about god.
Sorry, little buddy. You live by blind denial, you die
by blind denial.

Sorry, I don't have to define God because God defines everything in the
universe instead. God's spiritual existence is beyond the perception of
the human mind. Without perception, there is no definition. So there is
no need to define God. In fact, everything in philosophy is beyond its
dictionary definition. God is not the only philosophical subject that
can't be defined.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Peter Pan

2018-11-12 10:06:30 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

Before you can deny the existence of God, you need to define God first.
Since God can't be defined, you have no ground to deny God's existence.
You can't deny the existence of anything when you don't even know what
exactly you are denying. By being an atheist, your utter ignorance of
God makes your blind denial illogical and irrelevant.

So you have proven God with nothing more than words. Wow.
But, aaa, before you can assert the existence of god, you
need to define god first. Since god can't be defined,
you have no grounds to believe in god's existence, let
alone proselytize about god.
Sorry, little buddy. You live by blind denial, you die
by blind denial.

So you admit that when you talk about god, you have no
idea what you're talking about.

I better write that philosophical revelation down....

aaa

2018-11-12 17:22:44 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

Before you can deny the existence of God, you need to define God first.
Since God can't be defined, you have no ground to deny God's existence.
You can't deny the existence of anything when you don't even know what
exactly you are denying. By being an atheist, your utter ignorance of
God makes your blind denial illogical and irrelevant.

So you have proven God with nothing more than words. Wow.
But, aaa, before you can assert the existence of god, you
need to define god first. Since god can't be defined,
you have no grounds to believe in god's existence, let
alone proselytize about god.
Sorry, little buddy. You live by blind denial, you die
by blind denial.

So you admit that when you talk about god, you have no
idea what you're talking about.

That can only be true if you can prove that philosophy doesn't know what
it is talking about. I learn and understand everything about God through
philosophy by learning and following the philosophy of Jesus.

Post by Peter Pan
I better write that philosophical revelation down....

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Peter Pan

2018-11-12 20:17:08 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

Before you can deny the existence of God, you need to define God first.
Since God can't be defined, you have no ground to deny God's existence.
You can't deny the existence of anything when you don't even know what
exactly you are denying. By being an atheist, your utter ignorance of
God makes your blind denial illogical and irrelevant.

So you have proven God with nothing more than words. Wow.
But, aaa, before you can assert the existence of god, you
need to define god first. Since god can't be defined,
you have no grounds to believe in god's existence, let
alone proselytize about god.
Sorry, little buddy. You live by blind denial, you die
by blind denial.

So you admit that when you talk about god, you have no
idea what you're talking about.

Nope, that's only your off-the-shelf denial. You can't
define philosophy, therefore everything you say about
philosophy must be false. That proves gods are imaginary.

Your moral dilemma now is, should you tell the other
believers you just disproved their gods and wrecked their
religions, or keep quiet and let them find out the hard
way?

Post by Peter Pan
I better write that philosophical revelation down....

aaa

2018-11-13 03:53:31 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

Before you can deny the existence of God, you need to define God first.
Since God can't be defined, you have no ground to deny God's existence.
You can't deny the existence of anything when you don't even know what
exactly you are denying. By being an atheist, your utter ignorance of
God makes your blind denial illogical and irrelevant.

So you have proven God with nothing more than words. Wow.
But, aaa, before you can assert the existence of god, you
need to define god first. Since god can't be defined,
you have no grounds to believe in god's existence, let
alone proselytize about god.
Sorry, little buddy. You live by blind denial, you die
by blind denial.

So you admit that when you talk about god, you have no
idea what you're talking about.

Nope, that's only your off-the-shelf denial. You can't
define philosophy, therefore everything you say about
philosophy must be false. That proves gods are imaginary.

False. Since philosophy studies what's beyond the imagination of the
mind, God, being the subject of philosophy, can't be imaginary.

Post by Peter Pan
Your moral dilemma now is, should you tell the other
believers you just disproved their gods and wrecked their
religions, or keep quiet and let them find out the hard
way?

I have no moral dilemma because I have proven the existence of God with
philosophy. Philosophy is the study of God's spiritual reality.
Everything in philosophy is the evidence of God's existence.

Post by Peter Pan

Post by Peter Pan
I better write that philosophical revelation down....

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Peter Pan

2018-11-13 07:27:39 UTC

Post by aaa
Before you can deny the existence of God, you need to define God first.
Since God can't be defined, you have no ground to deny God's existence.
You can't deny the existence of anything when you don't even know what
exactly you are denying. By being an atheist, your utter ignorance of
God makes your blind denial illogical and irrelevant.

So you have proven God with nothing more than words. Wow.
But, aaa, before you can assert the existence of god, you
need to define god first. Since god can't be defined,
you have no grounds to believe in god's existence, let
alone proselytize about god.
Sorry, little buddy. You live by blind denial, you die
by blind denial.

So you admit that when you talk about god, you have no
idea what you're talking about.

Nope, that's only your off-the-shelf denial. You can't
define philosophy, therefore everything you say about
philosophy must be false. That proves gods are imaginary.

False. Since philosophy studies what's beyond the imagination of the
mind, God, being the subject of philosophy, can't be imaginary.

Nope. Since gods are the subject of theology, not
philosophy, they are all imaginary.

Post by Peter Pan
Your moral dilemma now is, should you tell the other
believers you just disproved their gods and wrecked their
religions, or keep quiet and let them find out the hard
way?

I have no moral dilemma because I have proven the existence of God with
philosophy. Philosophy is the study of God's spiritual reality.
Everything in philosophy is the evidence of God's existence.

Philosophy is the subject of that which can be studied.
If there were any real gods, they would be excluded. So
of course imaginary gods aren't philosophy either.

The sooner you realize it, the better off you will be.

aaa

2018-11-13 14:31:03 UTC

So you have proven God with nothing more than words. Wow.
But, aaa, before you can assert the existence of god, you
need to define god first. Since god can't be defined,
you have no grounds to believe in god's existence, let
alone proselytize about god.
Sorry, little buddy. You live by blind denial, you die
by blind denial.

So you admit that when you talk about god, you have no
idea what you're talking about.

Nope, that's only your off-the-shelf denial. You can't
define philosophy, therefore everything you say about
philosophy must be false. That proves gods are imaginary.

False. Since philosophy studies what's beyond the imagination of the
mind, God, being the subject of philosophy, can't be imaginary.

Nope. Since gods are the subject of theology, not
philosophy, they are all imaginary.

Since theology is a branch of philosophy, the God in theology still
can't be an imagination.

Post by Peter Pan

Post by Peter Pan
Your moral dilemma now is, should you tell the other
believers you just disproved their gods and wrecked their
religions, or keep quiet and let them find out the hard
way?

I have no moral dilemma because I have proven the existence of God with
philosophy. Philosophy is the study of God's spiritual reality.
Everything in philosophy is the evidence of God's existence.

Philosophy is the subject of that which can be studied.

Studied by what? Philosophical study is very different from the study of
science. Science is based on observation. Philosophy is based on
realization. They are not the same thing.

Post by Peter Pan
If there were any real gods, they would be excluded. So
of course imaginary gods aren't philosophy either.

God can't be observed in science, but God can be realized in philosophy.

In fact, the study of philosophy is all about realizing God's eternal
truth. This is why wisdom is essential to every philosopher on earth.

Post by Peter Pan
The sooner you realize it, the better off you will be.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

m***@gmail.com

2018-11-14 01:33:31 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

Before you can deny the existence of God, you need to define God first.
Since God can't be defined, you have no ground to deny God's existence.
You can't deny the existence of anything when you don't even know what
exactly you are denying. By being an atheist, your utter ignorance of
God makes your blind denial illogical and irrelevant.

So you have proven God with nothing more than words. Wow.
But, aaa, before you can assert the existence of god, you
need to define god first. Since god can't be defined,
you have no grounds to believe in god's existence, let
alone proselytize about god.
Sorry, little buddy. You live by blind denial, you die
by blind denial.

So you admit that when you talk about god, you have no
idea what you're talking about.
I better write that philosophical revelation down....

He's accepted some Christian bits on 'faith', changed what he doesn't like,
redefined what he doesn't like, added some nonsense of his own and expects
everyone to accept his mishmash on his word only. If you don't, he'll either
say you're blind or don't understand. Even if his so-called head injury is false, he certainly makes it sound real.

m***@gmail.com

2018-11-14 01:24:54 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

Before you can deny the existence of God, you need to define God first.
Since God can't be defined, you have no ground to deny God's existence.
You can't deny the existence of anything when you don't even know what
exactly you are denying. By being an atheist, your utter ignorance of
God makes your blind denial illogical and irrelevant.

So you have proven God with nothing more than words. Wow.
But, aaa, before you can assert the existence of god, you
need to define god first. Since god can't be defined,
you have no grounds to believe in god's existence, let
alone proselytize about god.
Sorry, little buddy. You live by blind denial, you die
by blind denial.

Yes, you do have to define your god, tell us what it's made of and what
it looks like. If you can't do this, even for yourself, you believe in
nothing. And, if you believe in nothing, everything you connect to this
nothing is nothing, too. Have fun figuring this out. Faith proves nothing.
Faith is merely what you are willing to accept from what others have told
you. Try thinking for yourself.

Sorry if this upsets anyone. It's what we get from theists all the time,
except their arguments don't work.

v***@gmail.com

2018-11-14 07:14:13 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

Before you can deny the existence of God, you need to define God first.
Since God can't be defined, you have no ground to deny God's existence.
You can't deny the existence of anything when you don't even know what
exactly you are denying. By being an atheist, your utter ignorance of
God makes your blind denial illogical and irrelevant.

So you have proven God with nothing more than words. Wow.
But, aaa, before you can assert the existence of god, you
need to define god first. Since god can't be defined,
you have no grounds to believe in god's existence, let
alone proselytize about god.
Sorry, little buddy. You live by blind denial, you die
by blind denial.

Yes, you do have to define your god, tell us what it's made of and what
it looks like. If you can't do this, even for yourself, you believe in
nothing. And, if you believe in nothing, everything you connect to this
nothing is nothing, too. Have fun figuring this out. Faith proves nothing.
Faith is merely what you are willing to accept from what others have told
you. Try thinking for yourself.
Sorry if this upsets anyone. It's what we get from theists all the time,
except their arguments don't work.

Nobody has to justify anything to you, you presumptuous bitch.

aaa

2018-11-15 04:59:15 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

Before you can deny the existence of God, you need to define God first.
Since God can't be defined, you have no ground to deny God's existence.
You can't deny the existence of anything when you don't even know what
exactly you are denying. By being an atheist, your utter ignorance of
God makes your blind denial illogical and irrelevant.

So you have proven God with nothing more than words. Wow.
But, aaa, before you can assert the existence of god, you
need to define god first. Since god can't be defined,
you have no grounds to believe in god's existence, let
alone proselytize about god.
Sorry, little buddy. You live by blind denial, you die
by blind denial.

Yes, you do have to define your god, tell us what it's made of and what
it looks like. If you can't do this, even for yourself, you believe in
nothing. And, if you believe in nothing, everything you connect to this
nothing is nothing, too. Have fun figuring this out. Faith proves nothing.
Faith is merely what you are willing to accept from what others have told
you. Try thinking for yourself.
Sorry if this upsets anyone. It's what we get from theists all the time,
except their arguments don't work.

Sorry, I have explained why it is not possible to define God. I will try
everything I can to explain God according to my personal understanding,
but it will never be any kind of definition to limit or define God. God
is love. Just as you can only understand love through experience, you
can only understand God through the experience in following the teaching
of Jesus also. No amount of my explanation can replace that.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

m***@gmail.com

2018-11-14 00:41:44 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

Before you can deny the existence of God, you need to define God first.
Since God can't be defined, you have no ground to deny God's existence.
You can't deny the existence of anything when you don't even know what
exactly you are denying. By being an atheist, your utter ignorance of
God makes your blind denial illogical and irrelevant.

You're the believer. It's your responsibility tp prove that what you
believe in is real. You've never been able to do this. And, don't
start on your 'spiritual' nonsense again. you haven't convinced
anyone here in that. We've read what you wrote and it's all nonsense,
disconnected and meaningless. Why? Because you made it all up and
changed the definitions of several words. And, saying that we are
'spiritually blind' means nothing. It's just your way of trying to
avoid responding.
nonsense.

duke

2018-11-09 18:28:38 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

...we don't need any support. It's self evident, even to a retarded
cockroach, that the probability of the existence of your god is near
zero.

You may be a retarded cockroach, but that doesn't preclude the existence of God
as creator.

the dukester, American-American

*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

m***@gmail.com

2018-11-14 00:30:43 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Then again there are a lot of atheists that are getting their own butts kicked
because they can't find any support at all for there being no God.

You certainly can't find any support for your myth being real. And, since
you're the believer, that's your responsibility. You've been irresponsible
in alt.atheism for over 20 years. That means you're mentally ill and a troll.

m***@gmail.com

2018-11-14 00:12:57 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Sounds like JTEM knows he's a loser. Of course, his narcissism won't
let him admit this to the world. It's hard enough for him to have to
admit it to himself.

2018-11-14 00:15:03 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Sounds like JTEM knows he's a loser. Of course, his narcissism won't
let him admit this to the world. It's hard enough for him to have to
admit it to himself.

this post is really doing good for going the distance

b***@m.nu

2018-11-08 02:51:39 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

because there is not a single theist here (except for that fat fuck
duke) that actually believes in the jesus fairy or the god fairy or
any fairies for that matter. They are here to troll and troll they
shall...

duke

2018-11-09 07:03:47 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Hey, nunie boy. You still climbing trees to find bananas.

the dukester, American-American

*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

m***@gmail.com

2018-11-14 00:31:34 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Hey, nunie boy. You still climbing trees to find bananas.

You're nasty, too.

hleopold

2018-11-14 04:43:38 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Hey, nunie boy. You still climbing trees to find bananas.

You're nasty, too.

As a kid I loved climbing trees, though I normally went with Pear Trees, not
banana trees. Later I climbed a 400 foot tower to install UHF transmitter
antennas. Even later than that I climbed the mast of the USS Oriskany (CV-34)
to remove and install new IFF antennas. Trying to insult a person by whether
or not a person climbs a tree, well, Duke is trying to insult by claiming
bilgit has to be a monkey or chimp. Since I consider both to be at very least
distant relatives. Since I consider both monkey and chimp to be far better
relatives than Duke could ever be...

--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness (remove gene to email)

“They are actually a manifestation of the famed Usenet hydra: you cut off
one head, and a stupider one grows back...“-Bonfire of the Deities

m***@gmail.com

2018-11-15 05:12:02 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Hey, nunie boy. You still climbing trees to find bananas.

You're nasty, too.

Some chimps like to throw stinky stuff at people. They think that is funny.
Earl is still at that level.

hleopold

2018-11-15 06:20:45 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Hey, nunie boy. You still climbing trees to find bananas.

You're nasty, too.

Some chimps like to throw stinky stuff at people. They think that is funny.
Earl is still at that level.

I think I mentioned that a few weeks ago in a post, chimps and monkeys do
tend to have a very low sense of humor, no argument from me on that. On the
other hand they certainly do have a sense of humor, low though it may be. Of
course Duke will disagree with me but even dogs and cats have senses of humor
as well, which to me means that they also have a sense of self, conscience in
other words. Heck I would even go so far as to say that most birds also have
senses of humor, especially crows, but many others as well.

My sister used to have an Amazon Blue parrot that got a lot of laughs at
feeding dried Scottish Bonnet peppers to the cat. Blu would deliberately drop
pieces of food to the cat, chicken, pizza, beef, whatever it had that the cat
would eat, then, once the cat got into the habit of quickly scarfing down
what was dropped to it by the bird, would then deliberately pick up a small
Scottish Bonnet and drop it, watching all the while. As soon as the cat bit
into it that bird would laugh its head off and strut around on top of its
cage. I saw Blu do this many times over several years. Once he did it to a
neighbors’ dog that my sister was taking care of for a week while its’
owner was in the hospital. That was one shocked dog when he bit that hot
pepper. ;-)

--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness (remove gene to email)

America, making tomorrow's terrorists, today.

duke

2018-11-14 23:31:26 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

Hey, nunie boy. You still climbing trees to find bananas.

You're nasty, too.

It's his profession.

the dukester, American-American

*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

duke

2018-11-09 07:01:02 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

What's the matter, little fellah. Scared to find out you made a massive
mistake.

the dukester, American-American

*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

m***@gmail.com

2018-11-14 00:08:45 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

The kind of theist trolls we get in alt.atheism either feel the need
to convert us or damn us to their non-existent hell. Once they get
that out of their systems, they become simpleton trolls. They don't
even care whether or not they are disobeying their particular form
of Christianity, Judaism, Islam or Hinduism. JTEM probably is
non-religious. He needs something to do to make him feel like he's
a big man, since he's a failure on Broadway.

You probably already know all this, but lurkers and newbies might not.

hleopold

2018-11-14 05:03:26 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

A failure on Broadway? Hell, I am a failure on Broadway. Not one agent there
has ever called me in for a casting call. Oh woo is me. boo hoo. Why I bet
there are hundreds, maybe even hundreds of thousands (maybe even billions)
who have also not been called in for a casting call. I think we all need to
get together and drown our sorrows in beer, or wine.

Ehh, I think I will just go grab that Medelo Nigra I have in the fridge
instead, let all those other losers go buy their own elsewhere. ;-)

Post by m***@gmail.com
You probably already know all this, but lurkers and newbies might not.

I had no idea we have a Broadway failure here, other than all the rest of we
Broadway failures. Lets all point at pee-scent and laugh as we drink our
beer, or wine.

Ha Ha!

--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness (remove gene to email)

“Apparently, the universe came into being for the purpose of enabling cats
to exist. (Or so the cats say)“ - Mark Bilbo

m***@gmail.com

2018-11-15 05:17:50 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

A failure on Broadway? Hell, I am a failure on Broadway. Not one agent there
has ever called me in for a casting call. Oh woo is me. boo hoo. Why I bet
there are hundreds, maybe even hundreds of thousands (maybe even billions)
who have also not been called in for a casting call. I think we all need to
get together and drown our sorrows in beer, or wine.
Ehh, I think I will just go grab that Medelo Nigra I have in the fridge
instead, let all those other losers go buy their own elsewhere. ;-)

Post by m***@gmail.com
You probably already know all this, but lurkers and newbies might not.

I had no idea we have a Broadway failure here, other than all the rest of we
Broadway failures. Lets all point at pee-scent and laugh as we drink our
beer, or wine.
Ha Ha!

He never mentioned being an actor. I think he's a writer or director.
Maybe both. Of course, he could be lying about that, too. Not Percent,
Jtem.

hleopold

2018-11-15 06:25:04 UTC

just do his not believing without fighting about it,
and trolling up this newsgroup about it

Why can't the common theist avoid this newsgroup? Go hang out in
the alt.jesus group and post all your thoughts there.

A failure on Broadway? Hell, I am a failure on Broadway. Not one agent there
has ever called me in for a casting call. Oh woo is me. boo hoo. Why I bet
there are hundreds, maybe even hundreds of thousands (maybe even billions)
who have also not been called in for a casting call. I think we all need to
get together and drown our sorrows in beer, or wine.
Ehh, I think I will just go grab that Medelo Nigra I have in the fridge
instead, let all those other losers go buy their own elsewhere. ;-)

Post by m***@gmail.com
You probably already know all this, but lurkers and newbies might not.

I had no idea we have a Broadway failure here, other than all the rest of we
Broadway failures. Lets all point at pee-scent and laugh as we drink our
beer, or wine.
Ha Ha!

He never mentioned being an actor. I think he's a writer or director.
Maybe both. Of course, he could be lying about that, too. Not Percent,
Jtem.

Oh, well in that case I apologize to Percent for that misaimed insult.

And laugh twice as loud at JTEM. What I had to say goes double in this case.

--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness (remove gene to email)

“Particle Physics porn has far too many close up shots for my liking“ -
Michael Gray

m***@gmail.com

2018-11-13 23:45:02 UTC