Post by Brad GreerOn Thu, 24 May 2012 05:52:06 -0700 (PDT), otter
Post by otterPost by Brad GreerOn Tue, 22 May 2012 17:41:32 -0700 (PDT), otter
Post by DanPoppPost by Neil X.Post by Neil X.Yeah, it's been a decade at least since it was that time for me.
Guinness is no better an example of a stou
Guinness is very little better as an example of a stout as Budweiser
is a good example of a Pilsner. Both are far from what they are
supposed to be.
Peace,
Neil X.
You and Ken F should get together for a Bud/Guinness drinking session. Guinness is delicious and for some reason is does seem to taste better in Eire.(probably just the surroundings) I believe that it has changed over the last 30 years and many Irishmen agree with me. (and some dont) I was in Dublin last week (my 57th trip) and I think Guinness has gotten lighter. Thirty years ago you could never see through the glass but now you can. I dont know the history of stout and can't be bothered to look it up but it tastes all right by me.
Guinness is a porter, right? I keep thinking of what happened to the
bucket of porter in Ulysses.
No, it's a stout.
But originally called a porter...
The Guinness of today is a stout. As others have said in this thread
it is considered by many to be the definitive dry stout.
Post by otterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guinness
Arthur Guinness started selling the dark beer porter in 1778.[9] The
first Guinness beers to use the term were Single Stout and Double
Stout in the 1840s.[10] Throughout the bulk of its history, Guinness
produced 'only three variations of a single beer type: porter or
single stout, double or extra and foreign stout for export'.[11]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_%28beer%29
Porter is a dark style of beer originating in London in the 18th
Century, [1] descended from brown beer, a well hopped beer made from
brown malt.[2] The name came about as a result of its popularity with
street and river porters.[3]
The history and development of stout and porter are intertwined.[4]
The name "stout" for a dark beer is believed to have come about
because a strong porter may be called "Extra Porter" or "Double
Porter" or "Stout Porter". The term "Stout Porter" would later be
shortened to just "Stout". For example, Guinness Extra Stout was
originally called "Extra Superior Porter" and was only given the name
Extra Stout in 1840.[5]
...
There can be no doubt who would have made the beer Joyce referred to
as "porter" in Ulysses.
I think there can be doubt - Joyce wasn't alive when Guinness was
calling it "porter", by the time Ulysses was written Guinness was
definitely known as a stout.
They still call it porter.
Post by Brad GreerOn Thu, 24 May 2012 05:52:06 -0700 (PDT), otter
Post by otterPost by Brad GreerOn Tue, 22 May 2012 17:41:32 -0700 (PDT), otter
Post by DanPoppPost by Neil X.Post by Neil X.Yeah, it's been a decade at least since it was that time for me.
Guinness is no better an example of a stou
Guinness is very little better as an example of a stout as Budweiser
is a good example of a Pilsner. Both are far from what they are
supposed to be.
Peace,
Neil X.
You and Ken F should get together for a Bud/Guinness drinking session. Guinness is delicious and for some reason is does seem to taste better in Eire.(probably just the surroundings) I believe that it has changed over the last 30 years and many Irishmen agree with me. (and some dont) I was in Dublin last week (my 57th trip) and I think Guinness has gotten lighter. Thirty years ago you could never see through the glass but now you can. I dont know the history of stout and can't be bothered to look it up but it tastes all right by me.
Guinness is a porter, right? I keep thinking of what happened to the
bucket of porter in Ulysses.
No, it's a stout.
But originally called a porter...
The Guinness of today is a stout. As others have said in this thread
it is considered by many to be the definitive dry stout.
Post by otterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guinness
Arthur Guinness started selling the dark beer porter in 1778.[9] The
first Guinness beers to use the term were Single Stout and Double
Stout in the 1840s.[10] Throughout the bulk of its history, Guinness
produced 'only three variations of a single beer type: porter or
single stout, double or extra and foreign stout for export'.[11]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_%28beer%29
Porter is a dark style of beer originating in London in the 18th
Century, [1] descended from brown beer, a well hopped beer made from
brown malt.[2] The name came about as a result of its popularity with
street and river porters.[3]
The history and development of stout and porter are intertwined.[4]
The name "stout" for a dark beer is believed to have come about
because a strong porter may be called "Extra Porter" or "Double
Porter" or "Stout Porter". The term "Stout Porter" would later be
shortened to just "Stout". For example, Guinness Extra Stout was
originally called "Extra Superior Porter" and was only given the name
Extra Stout in 1840.[5]
...
There can be no doubt who would have made the beer Joyce referred to
as "porter" in Ulysses.
I think there can be doubt - Joyce wasn't alive when Guinness was
calling it "porter", by the time Ulysses was written Guinness was
definitely known as a stout.
On Thu, 24 May 2012 05:52:06 -0700 (PDT), otter
Post by otterPost by Brad GreerOn Tue, 22 May 2012 17:41:32 -0700 (PDT), otter
Post by DanPoppPost by Neil X.Post by Neil X.Yeah, it's been a decade at least since it was that time for me.
Guinness is no better an example of a stou
Guinness is very little better as an example of a stout as Budweiser
is a good example of a Pilsner. Both are far from what they are
supposed to be.
Peace,
Neil X.
You and Ken F should get together for a Bud/Guinness drinking session. Guinness is delicious and for some reason is does seem to taste better in Eire.(probably just the surroundings) I believe that it has changed over the last 30 years and many Irishmen agree with me. (and some dont) I was in Dublin last week (my 57th trip) and I think Guinness has gotten lighter. Thirty years ago you could never see through the glass but now you can. I dont know the history of stout and can't be bothered to look it up but it tastes all right by me.
Guinness is a porter, right? I keep thinking of what happened to the
bucket of porter in Ulysses.
No, it's a stout.
But originally called a porter...
The Guinness of today is a stout. As others have said in this thread
it is considered by many to be the definitive dry stout.
Post by otterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guinness
Arthur Guinness started selling the dark beer porter in 1778.[9] The
first Guinness beers to use the term were Single Stout and Double
Stout in the 1840s.[10] Throughout the bulk of its history, Guinness
produced 'only three variations of a single beer type: porter or
single stout, double or extra and foreign stout for export'.[11]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_%28beer%29
Porter is a dark style of beer originating in London in the 18th
Century, [1] descended from brown beer, a well hopped beer made from
brown malt.[2] The name came about as a result of its popularity with
street and river porters.[3]
The history and development of stout and porter are intertwined.[4]
The name "stout" for a dark beer is believed to have come about
because a strong porter may be called "Extra Porter" or "Double
Porter" or "Stout Porter". The term "Stout Porter" would later be
shortened to just "Stout". For example, Guinness Extra Stout was
originally called "Extra Superior Porter" and was only given the name
Extra Stout in 1840.[5]
...
There can be no doubt who would have made the beer Joyce referred to
as "porter" in Ulysses.
I think there can be doubt - Joyce wasn't alive when Guinness was
calling it "porter", by the time Ulysses was written Guinness was
definitely known as a stout.
On Thu, 24 May 2012 05:52:06 -0700 (PDT), otter
Post by otterPost by Brad GreerOn Tue, 22 May 2012 17:41:32 -0700 (PDT), otter
Post by DanPoppPost by Neil X.Post by Neil X.Yeah, it's been a decade at least since it was that time for me.
Guinness is no better an example of a stou
Guinness is very little better as an example of a stout as Budweiser
is a good example of a Pilsner. Both are far from what they are
supposed to be.
Peace,
Neil X.
You and Ken F should get together for a Bud/Guinness drinking session. Guinness is delicious and for some reason is does seem to taste better in Eire.(probably just the surroundings) I believe that it has changed over the last 30 years and many Irishmen agree with me. (and some dont) I was in Dublin last week (my 57th trip) and I think Guinness has gotten lighter. Thirty years ago you could never see through the glass but now you can. I dont know the history of stout and can't be bothered to look it up but it tastes all right by me.
Guinness is a porter, right? I keep thinking of what happened to the
bucket of porter in Ulysses.
No, it's a stout.
But originally called a porter...
The Guinness of today is a stout. As others have said in this thread
it is considered by many to be the definitive dry stout.
Post by otterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guinness
Arthur Guinness started selling the dark beer porter in 1778.[9] The
first Guinness beers to use the term were Single Stout and Double
Stout in the 1840s.[10] Throughout the bulk of its history, Guinness
produced 'only three variations of a single beer type: porter or
single stout, double or extra and foreign stout for export'.[11]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_%28beer%29
Porter is a dark style of beer originating in London in the 18th
Century, [1] descended from brown beer, a well hopped beer made from
brown malt.[2] The name came about as a result of its popularity with
street and river porters.[3]
The history and development of stout and porter are intertwined.[4]
The name "stout" for a dark beer is believed to have come about
because a strong porter may be called "Extra Porter" or "Double
Porter" or "Stout Porter". The term "Stout Porter" would later be
shortened to just "Stout". For example, Guinness Extra Stout was
originally called "Extra Superior Porter" and was only given the name
Extra Stout in 1840.[5]
...
There can be no doubt who would have made the beer Joyce referred to
as "porter" in Ulysses.
I think there can be doubt - Joyce wasn't alive when Guinness was
calling it "porter", by the time Ulysses was written Guinness was
definitely known as a stout.
On Thu, 24 May 2012 05:52:06 -0700 (PDT), otter
Post by otterPost by Brad GreerOn Tue, 22 May 2012 17:41:32 -0700 (PDT), otter
Post by DanPoppPost by Neil X.Post by Neil X.Yeah, it's been a decade at least since it was that time for me.
Guinness is no better an example of a stou
Guinness is very little better as an example of a stout as Budweiser
is a good example of a Pilsner. Both are far from what they are
supposed to be.
Peace,
Neil X.
You and Ken F should get together for a Bud/Guinness drinking session. Guinness is delicious and for some reason is does seem to taste better in Eire.(probably just the surroundings) I believe that it has changed over the last 30 years and many Irishmen agree with me. (and some dont) I was in Dublin last week (my 57th trip) and I think Guinness has gotten lighter. Thirty years ago you could never see through the glass but now you can. I dont know the history of stout and can't be bothered to look it up but it tastes all right by me.
Guinness is a porter, right? I keep thinking of what happened to the
bucket of porter in Ulysses.
No, it's a stout.
But originally called a porter...
The Guinness of today is a stout. As others have said in this thread
it is considered by many to be the definitive dry stout.
Post by otterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guinness
Arthur Guinness started selling the dark beer porter in 1778.[9] The
first Guinness beers to use the term were Single Stout and Double
Stout in the 1840s.[10] Throughout the bulk of its history, Guinness
produced 'only three variations of a single beer type: porter or
single stout, double or extra and foreign stout for export'.[11]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_%28beer%29
Porter is a dark style of beer originating in London in the 18th
Century, [1] descended from brown beer, a well hopped beer made from
brown malt.[2] The name came about as a result of its popularity with
street and river porters.[3]
The history and development of stout and porter are intertwined.[4]
The name "stout" for a dark beer is believed to have come about
because a strong porter may be called "Extra Porter" or "Double
Porter" or "Stout Porter". The term "Stout Porter" would later be
shortened to just "Stout". For example, Guinness Extra Stout was
originally called "Extra Superior Porter" and was only given the name
Extra Stout in 1840.[5]
...
There can be no doubt who would have made the beer Joyce referred to
as "porter" in Ulysses.
I think there can be doubt - Joyce wasn't alive when Guinness was
calling it "porter", by the time Ulysses was written Guinness was
definitely known as a stout.
On Thu, 24 May 2012 05:52:06 -0700 (PDT), otter
Post by otterPost by Brad GreerOn Tue, 22 May 2012 17:41:32 -0700 (PDT), otter
Post by DanPoppPost by Neil X.Post by Neil X.Yeah, it's been a decade at least since it was that time for me.
Guinness is no better an example of a stou
Guinness is very little better as an example of a stout as Budweiser
is a good example of a Pilsner. Both are far from what they are
supposed to be.
Peace,
Neil X.
You and Ken F should get together for a Bud/Guinness drinking session. Guinness is delicious and for some reason is does seem to taste better in Eire.(probably just the surroundings) I believe that it has changed over the last 30 years and many Irishmen agree with me. (and some dont) I was in Dublin last week (my 57th trip) and I think Guinness has gotten lighter. Thirty years ago you could never see through the glass but now you can. I dont know the history of stout and can't be bothered to look it up but it tastes all right by me.
Guinness is a porter, right? I keep thinking of what happened to the
bucket of porter in Ulysses.
No, it's a stout.
But originally called a porter...
The Guinness of today is a stout. As others have said in this thread
it is considered by many to be the definitive dry stout.
Post by otterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guinness
Arthur Guinness started selling the dark beer porter in 1778.[9] The
first Guinness beers to use the term were Single Stout and Double
Stout in the 1840s.[10] Throughout the bulk of its history, Guinness
produced 'only three variations of a single beer type: porter or
single stout, double or extra and foreign stout for export'.[11]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_%28beer%29
Porter is a dark style of beer originating in London in the 18th
Century, [1] descended from brown beer, a well hopped beer made from
brown malt.[2] The name came about as a result of its popularity with
street and river porters.[3]
The history and development of stout and porter are intertwined.[4]
The name "stout" for a dark beer is believed to have come about
because a strong porter may be called "Extra Porter" or "Double
Porter" or "Stout Porter". The term "Stout Porter" would later be
shortened to just "Stout". For example, Guinness Extra Stout was
originally called "Extra Superior Porter" and was only given the name
Extra Stout in 1840.[5]
...
There can be no doubt who would have made the beer Joyce referred to
as "porter" in Ulysses.
I think there can be doubt - Joyce wasn't alive when Guinness was
calling it "porter", by the time Ulysses was written Guinness was
definitely known as a stout.
On Thu, 24 May 2012 05:52:06 -0700 (PDT), otter
Post by otterPost by Brad GreerOn Tue, 22 May 2012 17:41:32 -0700 (PDT), otter
Post by DanPoppPost by Neil X.Post by Neil X.Yeah, it's been a decade at least since it was that time for me.
Guinness is no better an example of a stou
Guinness is very little better as an example of a stout as Budweiser
is a good example of a Pilsner. Both are far from what they are
supposed to be.
Peace,
Neil X.
You and Ken F should get together for a Bud/Guinness drinking session. Guinness is delicious and for some reason is does seem to taste better in Eire.(probably just the surroundings) I believe that it has changed over the last 30 years and many Irishmen agree with me. (and some dont) I was in Dublin last week (my 57th trip) and I think Guinness has gotten lighter. Thirty years ago you could never see through the glass but now you can. I dont know the history of stout and can't be bothered to look it up but it tastes all right by me.
Guinness is a porter, right? I keep thinking of what happened to the
bucket of porter in Ulysses.
No, it's a stout.
But originally called a porter...
The Guinness of today is a stout. As others have said in this thread
it is considered by many to be the definitive dry stout.
Post by otterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guinness
Arthur Guinness started selling the dark beer porter in 1778.[9] The
first Guinness beers to use the term were Single Stout and Double
Stout in the 1840s.[10] Throughout the bulk of its history, Guinness
produced 'only three variations of a single beer type: porter or
single stout, double or extra and foreign stout for export'.[11]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_%28beer%29
Porter is a dark style of beer originating in London in the 18th
Century, [1] descended from brown beer, a well hopped beer made from
brown malt.[2] The name came about as a result of its popularity with
street and river porters.[3]
The history and development of stout and porter are intertwined.[4]
The name "stout" for a dark beer is believed to have come about
because a strong porter may be called "Extra Porter" or "Double
Porter" or "Stout Porter". The term "Stout Porter" would later be
shortened to just "Stout". For example, Guinness Extra Stout was
originally called "Extra Superior Porter" and was only given the name
Extra Stout in 1840.[5]
...
There can be no doubt who would have made the beer Joyce referred to
as "porter" in Ulysses.
I think there can be doubt - Joyce wasn't alive when Guinness was
calling it "porter", by the time Ulysses was written Guinness was
definitely known as a stout.