Post by BARRY Z. SHEIN jew paedophile of 700 Washington St B'righton MassOn Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:36:23 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
[FLUHS Grik skata]...and better air in here again! [sic][SIC!!! LOL]
Watch, it geezer!
We also watch classy young ladies!
http://redbust.com/cute-teen-redhead/
Post by BARRY Z. SHEIN jew paedophile of 700 Washington St B'righton MassPost by Michael EjercitoThe mangina is so obsessed with the anus.
You are so obsessed with zsuckling the freshly squeezed jew diarrhoea
from the jew anus.
You prove, ON THE SPOT, what I wrote about you!
Post by BARRY Z. SHEIN jew paedophile of 700 Washington St B'righton MassPost by Michael EjercitoSometimes, some normal boys and normal men fantasize about vulva.
You and your needledick are EXEMPT from vulva.
I do not have a needledick!
Post by BARRY Z. SHEIN jew paedophile of 700 Washington St B'righton MassPost by Michael EjercitoBut no one accused him of being a normal man.
YOU are a subnormal subhuman!
Post by Michael EjercitoJack Marshall writes about a police chief's letter.
Who gives two warm jew shits what inanities Jack Marshall (whoever the
fuck that is) has plagiarised about a chief letter?
Nithing, normal people do!
Here is my comment.
http://ethicsalarms.com/2020/07/25/ethics-quiz-the-police-chiefs-letter/#comment-701243
this week, there was this meme going around that president Trump is sending
stormtroopersto suppress peaceful protests. Jack has yet to devote a full
blog post on the subject, though.
It is not just random bloggers and commenters who are making this claim.
https://pjmedia.com/election/tyler-o-neil/2020/07/22/as-antifa-terrorizes-portland-biden-claims-trump-is-attacking-peaceful-protesters-n670345
I will address these claims.
1 Trump is sending stormtroopers.
There are only two allegations- one of excessive force, the other of an
unlawful arrest- for which there is probable cause, and which might rise to
the level of “stormtrooper” behavior.
This hardly means that the president is deploying stormtroopers.
2. Sending in federal law enforcement without cooperation of the states
violates federalism principles.
This too is wrong. The fact of the matter is that federal law enforcement
agents may apprehend suspects anywhere in the United States.
In this case, federal agents were sent to deal with a credible threat to
federal property. Protection of federal property is most assuredly within
the Article I powers of Congress.
3. It is wrong for federal agents to grab protesters off the street and put
them in unmarked vehicles while not wearing nametags.
If a court were to judge the legality of such an arrest, whether via a
habeas corpus petition or an evidence suppression hearing, the dispositive
issue would be if the agents had probable cause. It would not matter what
the arresting officers were wearing, nor what the vehicle used to transport
the arrestee looks like.
It would turn on if there was sufficient probable cause to believe the
arrestee had committed a federal crime (for which the arrestee had not been
previously been charged or arrested.)
4. Trump is stoking the fires of division in this country.
No, this is being done by those who are making these outlandish claims about
federal agents with very little evidence
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com