Discussion:
Did Humphrey Robinson of London and Thicket Priory in Yorkshire, marry twice, first to Margaret Barnes and second to Anne Pyott?
(too old to reply)
Wibs
2020-06-30 11:04:11 UTC
Permalink
Did Humphrey Robinson of Thicket Priory marry twice? Depending on which Heraldic Visitation or scholarly publication you read, the answer is yes, and no.

So, who says he married once?

William Dugdale, in his The Visitation of the County of Yorke in 1665-1666, (Surtees Society, Vol. XXXVI, London, 1859), p. 142, gives just one marriage, to Anne, dau of Richard Pyott, Alderman of London. (https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=moa;idno=AHE1867.0001.001)

Joseph Hunter, in his Familae Minorum Gentium, Vol. III, (Harleian Society, Vol. XXXIX, London 1895), p. 990, concurs with the above. (https://archive.org/details/FamiliaeMinorumGentiumV39/page/n171/mode/2up)

As does Clay in his ‘Dugdale’s Visitation of Yorkshire with Additions’, Vol III, (Exeter, 1917), p. 170, [Not viewable in the UK, except via a VPN].(https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=gri.ark:/13960/t9j41wf0k&view=1up&seq=5)

So, who says he married twice?

In Howard and Armitage (Eds.) The Visitation of London in the Year 1568, taken by Robert Cooke, and since augmented both with Descents, (Harleian Society, Vol. 1, London, 1869), the editors provide in their Additions, p. [2], the following: Margaret, dau of Bartholomew Barnes of St. Swithins, London, Citizen and Mercer, wife of Humphrey Robinson. However, the Editors give this extra information in italics, and the note to this says the portions given italics are somewhat doubtful. (https://archive.org/details/visitationoflond01cook/page/2/mode/2up)

In Boyd’s ‘Inhabitants of London’, Boyd goes further and names the two wives of Humphrey Robinson as Anne Pyott and Margaret Barnes, dau of Bartholomew. [Available via Find My Past].

The Pyott pedigree on Stirnet also gives as a first wife of Humphrey Robinson an unnamed dau of Bartholomew Barnes.

At first, I was highly sceptical, but I needed to put this matter to bed, as I am in the process of writing the history of Thicket Priory in the East Riding of Yorkshire, of which Humphrey Robinson, son of John Robinson, alderman of London, was one of the early owners.

First, I obtained a copy of the will of Bartholomew Barnes, citizen and mercer of London, dated 1st March 1605/6, proved 10 October 1606 (PCC, PROB-11-108-269), in which he names his four daughters: Elizabeth, Margaret, Maria and Sara; and their respective husbands, Rowland Backhouse, Humphrey Robinson, Maurice Abbot and Bartholomew Holland.

This will confirmed the addition to The Visitation of London in the Year 1568, but the question remained, was the Humphrey Robinson who married Margaret Barnes the same Humphrey Robinson who later married Anne Pyott and went on to take up residence in Thicket Priory?

I next consulted the lesser known Joseph Foster’s ‘Visitation of Yorkshire 1584/5, by Robert Glover, to which is added The Subsequent Visitation made in 1612, by Richard St. George’, (London, 1875), p. 568, which again (but in italics) says that Humphrey Robinson married 1st an unnamed daughter of Bartholomew Barnes, of London, merchant, and 2nd an unnamed daughter of Richard Pyott, grocer, Alderman of London.

The balance was now tipping in favour of Humphrey having been married twice, but the fact that Humphrey’s son and heir, Richard Robinson, when presenting his written descents to Dugdale in 1665/6, failed to mention that his father had married twice, was still gnawing at me.

The father of Humphrey Robinson was John Robinson, a wealthy citizen and Merchant Taylor and Merchant of the Staple in England, and Alderman of London, made his will in 1599, which was proved 8 Dec 1601. The will is printed in North Country Wills Vol 2, (Surtees Society, Vol. CXXI, Durham and London, 1912), pp. 183-186, (https://web.archive.org/web/20130224191650/http:/www.uiowa.edu/~c030149a/northern/surtees_121text.pdf) in which Clay, the Editor, says this of John Robinson:

An eminent merchant in London, who bought large properties in Yorkshire. He had five sons, four of whom were merchants, and founded families, the descendants of which appeared at Dugdale's Visitation in 1666. From John the Rither, from Henry the Buckton, from Arthur the Dighton, and from Humphrey the Thicket lines came. Their pedigrees are duly recorded by Dugdale. The testator died 19 February, 1599-60, and was buried at St. Helen's, Bishopsgate,
where a fine monument still exists. His wife, Christian, died 24 April, 1592.

Humphrey Robinson is named in his father’s will, but no wife or any children are mentioned, which would imply that Humphrey was not married in 1599 when he would have been 20 years of age, having been baptised 1 Feb 1579, at St. Helens, Bishopsgate, London.

The first son of Humphrey and Anne Pyott, Richard Robinson, was born circa 1614 (he married in 1635), meaning that if Humphrey had married twice the two marriages would probably have been between 1599 and 1614.

While searching for these marriages I thought the truth had finally came out, that Margaret Barnes had actually married twice. First to Humphrey Robinson (but NOT the Humphrey Robinson who married Anne Pyott, as HER Humphrey Robinson had apparently died), and secondly to Sir Maurice Abbott, Alderman of London, and died 5th September 1630, for which her funeral certificate survives.
Surrey Archaeological Collections, Vol. III, p. 257, (https://archive.org/details/surreyarchaeolog03surruoft/page/256/mode/2up?q=Barnes) which begins:

‘The vertuous Lady Dame Margaret Abbott, late wife of Sir Maurice Abbott Knight, and Alderman of London, and daughter of Bartholomew Barnes, citizen and sometimes Alderman of London departed this mortall life the fifte daye of September 1630’

BUT, in the will of Bartholomew Barnes mentioned earlier, it was his third daughter, Maria, not Margaret, who had married Maurice Abbot.

So, back to square one. Can anyone throw any light on all this?

Wibs
joseph cook
2020-06-30 12:04:01 UTC
Permalink
Wibs:
I just looked at the will of Batholomew Barnes. I see the four husbands of his four daughters mentioned, but I wouldn't assume the order listed is the same as the order he earlier lists his daughters.
Also, am I missing something or does the will say "three hundred pounds shall be paid to my daughter Maria Holland within two months..."

So, this means Maria was the wife of the earlier mentioned Bartholomew Holland, and Margaret was the wife of Maurice Abbott.

CHeers,
Joe C
joseph cook
2020-06-30 12:29:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by joseph cook
I just looked at the will of Batholomew Barnes. I see the four husbands of his four daughters mentioned, but I wouldn't assume the order listed is the same as the order he earlier lists his daughters.
Also, am I missing something or does the will say "three hundred pounds shall be paid to my daughter Maria Holland within two months..."
So, this means Maria was the wife of the earlier mentioned Bartholomew Holland, and Margaret was the wife of Maurice Abbott.
A note about the probate of Bartholomew Barnes's widow, Margaret (Now Margaret Napier) is in PCC, year Feb 1637/8 "May 13th or thereabouts being the first tyme Sir Morris Abbott came downe after the Lady Napier fell sicke & her speech fayled her" but I don't see her will here.
Oh wait, there it is, 4 months later June 1638.."nappier". I skimmed it fast, but maybe info there, its available online ancestry.com:
"England & Wales, Prerogative Court of Canterbury Wills, 1384-1858
PROB 11: Will Registers 1624-1643 Piece 177: Lee, Quire Numbers 52-114 (1638)" Image 506 of 1011

--Joe C
joseph cook
2020-06-30 12:36:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by joseph cook
Post by joseph cook
I just looked at the will of Batholomew Barnes. I see the four husbands of his four daughters mentioned, but I wouldn't assume the order listed is the same as the order he earlier lists his daughters.
Also, am I missing something or does the will say "three hundred pounds shall be paid to my daughter Maria Holland within two months..."
So, this means Maria was the wife of the earlier mentioned Bartholomew Holland, and Margaret was the wife of Maurice Abbott.
A note about the probate of Bartholomew Barnes's widow, Margaret (Now Margaret Napier) is in PCC, year Feb 1637/8 "May 13th or thereabouts being the first tyme Sir Morris Abbott came downe after the Lady Napier fell sicke & her speech fayled her" but I don't see her will here.
"England & Wales, Prerogative Court of Canterbury Wills, 1384-1858
PROB 11: Will Registers 1624-1643 Piece 177: Lee, Quire Numbers 52-114 (1638)" Image 506 of 1011
More evidence that it was Margaret who did in fact marry Maurice Abbott:
THey were granted a license to marry 27 May 1598 "Maurice ABbott of St. Michael Bassishaw, Draper, aged 30 or more, a Widower about 8 months past, and Margaret Barnes, Maiden, of Widdford, Herts, daughter of Bartholomew Barnes of the same, Gent., and with his consent, age about 18, at Widford Church, where she dwells" as given by "THe Lonson and Middlesex Notebook"
Wibs
2020-06-30 13:12:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by joseph cook
Post by joseph cook
Post by joseph cook
I just looked at the will of Batholomew Barnes. I see the four husbands of his four daughters mentioned, but I wouldn't assume the order listed is the same as the order he earlier lists his daughters.
Also, am I missing something or does the will say "three hundred pounds shall be paid to my daughter Maria Holland within two months..."
So, this means Maria was the wife of the earlier mentioned Bartholomew Holland, and Margaret was the wife of Maurice Abbott.
A note about the probate of Bartholomew Barnes's widow, Margaret (Now Margaret Napier) is in PCC, year Feb 1637/8 "May 13th or thereabouts being the first tyme Sir Morris Abbott came downe after the Lady Napier fell sicke & her speech fayled her" but I don't see her will here.
"England & Wales, Prerogative Court of Canterbury Wills, 1384-1858
PROB 11: Will Registers 1624-1643 Piece 177: Lee, Quire Numbers 52-114 (1638)" Image 506 of 1011
THey were granted a license to marry 27 May 1598 "Maurice ABbott of St. Michael Bassishaw, Draper, aged 30 or more, a Widower about 8 months past, and Margaret Barnes, Maiden, of Widdford, Herts, daughter of Bartholomew Barnes of the same, Gent., and with his consent, age about 18, at Widford Church, where she dwells" as given by "THe Lonson and Middlesex Notebook"
If Margaret married Maurice Abbott in 1598, as a maiden, and died as Dame Margaret Abbott in 1630, then who married the Humphrey Robinson, one of the four daughters mentioned in the will of Bartholomew Barnes? We now know that Elizabeth Barnes married Rowland Backhouse; Margaret Barnes married Maurice Abbott; Maria married Bartholomew Holland; so that only leaves Sara who could have married Humphrey Robinson. Now, if that marriage could be found ...
Wibs
2020-06-30 16:12:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wibs
Post by joseph cook
Post by joseph cook
Post by joseph cook
I just looked at the will of Batholomew Barnes. I see the four husbands of his four daughters mentioned, but I wouldn't assume the order listed is the same as the order he earlier lists his daughters.
Also, am I missing something or does the will say "three hundred pounds shall be paid to my daughter Maria Holland within two months..."
So, this means Maria was the wife of the earlier mentioned Bartholomew Holland, and Margaret was the wife of Maurice Abbott.
A note about the probate of Bartholomew Barnes's widow, Margaret (Now Margaret Napier) is in PCC, year Feb 1637/8 "May 13th or thereabouts being the first tyme Sir Morris Abbott came downe after the Lady Napier fell sicke & her speech fayled her" but I don't see her will here.
"England & Wales, Prerogative Court of Canterbury Wills, 1384-1858
PROB 11: Will Registers 1624-1643 Piece 177: Lee, Quire Numbers 52-114 (1638)" Image 506 of 1011
THey were granted a license to marry 27 May 1598 "Maurice ABbott of St. Michael Bassishaw, Draper, aged 30 or more, a Widower about 8 months past, and Margaret Barnes, Maiden, of Widdford, Herts, daughter of Bartholomew Barnes of the same, Gent., and with his consent, age about 18, at Widford Church, where she dwells" as given by "THe Lonson and Middlesex Notebook"
If Margaret married Maurice Abbott in 1598, as a maiden, and died as Dame Margaret Abbott in 1630, then who married the Humphrey Robinson, one of the four daughters mentioned in the will of Bartholomew Barnes? We now know that Elizabeth Barnes married Rowland Backhouse; Margaret Barnes married Maurice Abbott; Maria married Bartholomew Holland; so that only leaves Sara who could have married Humphrey Robinson. Now, if that marriage could be found ...
And indeed it has! Sara Barnes married Humfrye Robinson, 4 Aug 1601, Widford, Herts (same church as her sister Margaret).

Thanks again Joe, your find of the marriage licence for Maurice Abbott and Margaret Barnes, at Widford Church, led me to it.
Wibs
2020-06-30 16:37:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wibs
Post by Wibs
Post by joseph cook
Post by joseph cook
Post by joseph cook
I just looked at the will of Batholomew Barnes. I see the four husbands of his four daughters mentioned, but I wouldn't assume the order listed is the same as the order he earlier lists his daughters.
Also, am I missing something or does the will say "three hundred pounds shall be paid to my daughter Maria Holland within two months..."
So, this means Maria was the wife of the earlier mentioned Bartholomew Holland, and Margaret was the wife of Maurice Abbott.
A note about the probate of Bartholomew Barnes's widow, Margaret (Now Margaret Napier) is in PCC, year Feb 1637/8 "May 13th or thereabouts being the first tyme Sir Morris Abbott came downe after the Lady Napier fell sicke & her speech fayled her" but I don't see her will here.
"England & Wales, Prerogative Court of Canterbury Wills, 1384-1858
PROB 11: Will Registers 1624-1643 Piece 177: Lee, Quire Numbers 52-114 (1638)" Image 506 of 1011
THey were granted a license to marry 27 May 1598 "Maurice ABbott of St. Michael Bassishaw, Draper, aged 30 or more, a Widower about 8 months past, and Margaret Barnes, Maiden, of Widdford, Herts, daughter of Bartholomew Barnes of the same, Gent., and with his consent, age about 18, at Widford Church, where she dwells" as given by "THe Lonson and Middlesex Notebook"
If Margaret married Maurice Abbott in 1598, as a maiden, and died as Dame Margaret Abbott in 1630, then who married the Humphrey Robinson, one of the four daughters mentioned in the will of Bartholomew Barnes? We now know that Elizabeth Barnes married Rowland Backhouse; Margaret Barnes married Maurice Abbott; Maria married Bartholomew Holland; so that only leaves Sara who could have married Humphrey Robinson. Now, if that marriage could be found ...
And indeed it has! Sara Barnes married Humfrye Robinson, 4 Aug 1601, Widford, Herts (same church as her sister Margaret).
Thanks again Joe, your find of the marriage licence for Maurice Abbott and Margaret Barnes, at Widford Church, led me to it.
More info found: Both Bartholomew Barnes and Humphrey Robinson were members of the Company of Merchants of London, Trading into the East-Indies (https://www.fas.nus.edu.sg/hist/eia/documents_archive/eic.php), so he COULD be the Humphrey Robinson who later married Anne Pyott, if I can now find a death/burial for Sara Robinson.
joseph cook
2020-06-30 17:20:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wibs
Post by Wibs
Thanks again Joe, your find of the marriage licence for Maurice Abbott and Margaret Barnes, at Widford Church, led me to it.
More info found: Both Bartholomew Barnes and Humphrey Robinson were members of the Company of Merchants of London, Trading into the East-Indies (https://www.fas.nus.edu.sg/hist/eia/documents_archive/eic.php), so he COULD be the Humphrey Robinson who later married Anne Pyott, if I can now find a death/burial for Sara Robinson.
Huzzah! I found many published works like you where the information was confused or wrong on this family. Nice to have it sorted out.

--Joe C
Wibs
2020-06-30 17:41:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by joseph cook
Post by Wibs
Post by Wibs
Thanks again Joe, your find of the marriage licence for Maurice Abbott and Margaret Barnes, at Widford Church, led me to it.
More info found: Both Bartholomew Barnes and Humphrey Robinson were members of the Company of Merchants of London, Trading into the East-Indies (https://www.fas.nus.edu.sg/hist/eia/documents_archive/eic.php), so he COULD be the Humphrey Robinson who later married Anne Pyott, if I can now find a death/burial for Sara Robinson.
Huzzah! I found many published works like you where the information was confused or wrong on this family. Nice to have it sorted out.
--Joe C
It is still possible that there were two merchants named Humphrey Robinson in London at this time, but a death/burial for Sara Robinson between 1601 and 1614 would make it likely that Humphrey married twice, and impossible if she died after 1614. Still searching for her death/burial :)
joseph cook
2020-07-01 02:22:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wibs
Post by joseph cook
Post by Wibs
Post by Wibs
Thanks again Joe, your find of the marriage licence for Maurice Abbott and Margaret Barnes, at Widford Church, led me to it.
More info found: Both Bartholomew Barnes and Humphrey Robinson were members of the Company of Merchants of London, Trading into the East-Indies (https://www.fas.nus.edu.sg/hist/eia/documents_archive/eic.php), so he COULD be the Humphrey Robinson who later married Anne Pyott, if I can now find a death/burial for Sara Robinson.
Huzzah! I found many published works like you where the information was confused or wrong on this family. Nice to have it sorted out.
--Joe C
It is still possible that there were two merchants named Humphrey Robinson in London at this time, but a death/burial for Sara Robinson between 1601 and 1614 would make it likely that Humphrey married twice, and impossible if she died after 1614. Still searching for her death/burial :)
A Sara Robinson, wife of Humfrey Robinson was buried June 20, 1605 Church of St. Bartholomew by the Exchange, London, England.

Humphrey was married to Anne Piott in the very same church Nov 12, 1605.

Mystery solved.
CHeers!
Joe Cook
Wibs
2020-07-01 13:14:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by joseph cook
Post by Wibs
Post by joseph cook
Post by Wibs
Post by Wibs
Thanks again Joe, your find of the marriage licence for Maurice Abbott and Margaret Barnes, at Widford Church, led me to it.
More info found: Both Bartholomew Barnes and Humphrey Robinson were members of the Company of Merchants of London, Trading into the East-Indies (https://www.fas.nus.edu.sg/hist/eia/documents_archive/eic.php), so he COULD be the Humphrey Robinson who later married Anne Pyott, if I can now find a death/burial for Sara Robinson.
Huzzah! I found many published works like you where the information was confused or wrong on this family. Nice to have it sorted out.
--Joe C
It is still possible that there were two merchants named Humphrey Robinson in London at this time, but a death/burial for Sara Robinson between 1601 and 1614 would make it likely that Humphrey married twice, and impossible if she died after 1614. Still searching for her death/burial :)
A Sara Robinson, wife of Humfrey Robinson was buried June 20, 1605 Church of St. Bartholomew by the Exchange, London, England.
Humphrey was married to Anne Piott in the very same church Nov 12, 1605.
Mystery solved.
CHeers!
Joe Cook
Amazing, thanks Joe. I have Find my Past, and the FamilySearch website says that the registers for St Bartholomew by the Exchange are covered by FMP, but neither this burial nor the marriage show up! May I ask what source you used? I may need to change my database subscriptions! :)

Wibs
taf
2020-07-01 13:59:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wibs
Post by joseph cook
A Sara Robinson, wife of Humfrey Robinson was buried June 20, 1605 Church
of St. Bartholomew by the Exchange, London, England.
Humphrey was married to Anne Piott in the very same church Nov 12, 1605.
Amazing, thanks Joe. I have Find my Past, and the FamilySearch website says
that the registers for St Bartholomew by the Exchange are covered by FMP,
but neither this burial nor the marriage show up! May I ask what source you
used? I may need to change my database subscriptions! :)
Ancestry has images:

November 12 1605
Humfrey Robinson & Ann Piott was maryed

20 June 1605
Mistris Sara Robinson wiffe of Humfrey Robinson was buryed

taf
Wibs
2020-07-01 14:25:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by taf
Post by Wibs
Post by joseph cook
A Sara Robinson, wife of Humfrey Robinson was buried June 20, 1605 Church
of St. Bartholomew by the Exchange, London, England.
Humphrey was married to Anne Piott in the very same church Nov 12, 1605.
Amazing, thanks Joe. I have Find my Past, and the FamilySearch website says
that the registers for St Bartholomew by the Exchange are covered by FMP,
but neither this burial nor the marriage show up! May I ask what source you
used? I may need to change my database subscriptions! :)
November 12 1605
Humfrey Robinson & Ann Piott was maryed
20 June 1605
Mistris Sara Robinson wiffe of Humfrey Robinson was buryed
taf
Thanks for that taf.

Family Search says Ancestry has the images for this period, but it's FMP that has the indexes. Oh well!

(https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/St_Margaret_Lothbury_with_St_Christopher_le_Stocks_and_St_Bartholomew_by_the_Exchange,_London_Genealogy#St_Bartholomew_by_the_Exchange_Parish)


Wibs
taf
2020-07-01 16:10:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wibs
Post by taf
Post by Wibs
Post by joseph cook
A Sara Robinson, wife of Humfrey Robinson was buried June 20, 1605 Church
of St. Bartholomew by the Exchange, London, England.
Humphrey was married to Anne Piott in the very same church Nov 12, 1605.
Amazing, thanks Joe. I have Find my Past, and the FamilySearch website says
that the registers for St Bartholomew by the Exchange are covered by FMP,
but neither this burial nor the marriage show up! May I ask what source you
used? I may need to change my database subscriptions! :)
November 12 1605
Humfrey Robinson & Ann Piott was maryed
20 June 1605
Mistris Sara Robinson wiffe of Humfrey Robinson was buryed
taf
Thanks for that taf.
Family Search says Ancestry has the images for this period, but it's FMP that has the indexes. Oh well!
(https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/St_Margaret_Lothbury_with_St_Christopher_le_Stocks_and_St_Bartholomew_by_the_Exchange,_London_Genealogy#St_Bartholomew_by_the_Exchange_Parish)
The problem with a table like this is that the goal is to fill in the table, not include redundancy. Ancestry has these all indexed in their 'London, England, Church of England Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1538-1812' database.

For what it's worth, the following come up relevant to Humphrey from St Barts Exch:

Bartholomew, son, bap 19 June 1603
John Robinson, son, bap 16 December 1604
Jane Robinson, wife, bur 20 June 1605
Humphrey Robinson & Ann Piott mar 12 November 1605
John Robinson, son, bur 2 March 1605/6
Ann Robinson, dau bap 7 December 1606

taf
Wibs
2020-07-01 21:40:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by taf
Post by Wibs
Post by taf
Post by Wibs
Post by joseph cook
A Sara Robinson, wife of Humfrey Robinson was buried June 20, 1605 Church
of St. Bartholomew by the Exchange, London, England.
Humphrey was married to Anne Piott in the very same church Nov 12, 1605.
Amazing, thanks Joe. I have Find my Past, and the FamilySearch website says
that the registers for St Bartholomew by the Exchange are covered by FMP,
but neither this burial nor the marriage show up! May I ask what source you
used? I may need to change my database subscriptions! :)
November 12 1605
Humfrey Robinson & Ann Piott was maryed
20 June 1605
Mistris Sara Robinson wiffe of Humfrey Robinson was buryed
taf
Thanks for that taf.
Family Search says Ancestry has the images for this period, but it's FMP that has the indexes. Oh well!
(https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/St_Margaret_Lothbury_with_St_Christopher_le_Stocks_and_St_Bartholomew_by_the_Exchange,_London_Genealogy#St_Bartholomew_by_the_Exchange_Parish)
The problem with a table like this is that the goal is to fill in the table, not include redundancy. Ancestry has these all indexed in their 'London, England, Church of England Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1538-1812' database.
Bartholomew, son, bap 19 June 1603
John Robinson, son, bap 16 December 1604
Jane Robinson, wife, bur 20 June 1605
Humphrey Robinson & Ann Piott mar 12 November 1605
John Robinson, son, bur 2 March 1605/6
Ann Robinson, dau bap 7 December 1606
taf
Thanks for those taf. I found early on that Humphrey Robinson was connected with St Bartholomew by the Exchange Parish, and, perhaps foolishly, I relied on that table in FamilySearch, as in the first instance indexes were more important than images, as I had no dates to work on. On that basis I subscribed to FMP, and when I put in 'Robinson' for any event in that parish 1605 +/- 20 years, I got zero hits. So much for the 'index'!

I have copies of all printed Visitations of Yorkshire in my digital library, and only put in the first link in my initial post, I should have tried a few other links.

Thanks again

Wibs
joseph cook
2020-07-02 01:04:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wibs
Post by taf
Post by Wibs
Post by taf
Post by Wibs
Post by joseph cook
A Sara Robinson, wife of Humfrey Robinson was buried June 20, 1605 Church
of St. Bartholomew by the Exchange, London, England.
Humphrey was married to Anne Piott in the very same church Nov 12, 1605.
Amazing, thanks Joe. I have Find my Past, and the FamilySearch website says
that the registers for St Bartholomew by the Exchange are covered by FMP,
but neither this burial nor the marriage show up! May I ask what source you
used? I may need to change my database subscriptions! :)
November 12 1605
Humfrey Robinson & Ann Piott was maryed
20 June 1605
Mistris Sara Robinson wiffe of Humfrey Robinson was buryed
taf
Thanks for that taf.
Family Search says Ancestry has the images for this period, but it's FMP that has the indexes. Oh well!
(https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/St_Margaret_Lothbury_with_St_Christopher_le_Stocks_and_St_Bartholomew_by_the_Exchange,_London_Genealogy#St_Bartholomew_by_the_Exchange_Parish)
The problem with a table like this is that the goal is to fill in the table, not include redundancy. Ancestry has these all indexed in their 'London, England, Church of England Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1538-1812' database.
Bartholomew, son, bap 19 June 1603
John Robinson, son, bap 16 December 1604
Jane Robinson, wife, bur 20 June 1605
Humphrey Robinson & Ann Piott mar 12 November 1605
John Robinson, son, bur 2 March 1605/6
Ann Robinson, dau bap 7 December 1606
taf
Thanks for those taf. I found early on that Humphrey Robinson was connected with St Bartholomew by the Exchange Parish, and, perhaps foolishly, I relied on that table in FamilySearch, as in the first instance indexes were more important than images, as I had no dates to work on. On that basis I subscribed to FMP, and when I put in 'Robinson' for any event in that parish 1605 +/- 20 years, I got zero hits. So much for the 'index'!
I have copies of all printed Visitations of Yorkshire in my digital library, and only put in the first link in my initial post, I should have tried a few other links.
Thanks again
Wibs
IF you want an email copy of the photo of the parish register records let me know.
Wibs
2020-07-02 14:23:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by joseph cook
Post by Wibs
Post by taf
Post by Wibs
Post by taf
Post by Wibs
Post by joseph cook
A Sara Robinson, wife of Humfrey Robinson was buried June 20, 1605 Church
of St. Bartholomew by the Exchange, London, England.
Humphrey was married to Anne Piott in the very same church Nov 12, 1605.
Amazing, thanks Joe. I have Find my Past, and the FamilySearch website says
that the registers for St Bartholomew by the Exchange are covered by FMP,
but neither this burial nor the marriage show up! May I ask what source you
used? I may need to change my database subscriptions! :)
November 12 1605
Humfrey Robinson & Ann Piott was maryed
20 June 1605
Mistris Sara Robinson wiffe of Humfrey Robinson was buryed
taf
Thanks for that taf.
Family Search says Ancestry has the images for this period, but it's FMP that has the indexes. Oh well!
(https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/St_Margaret_Lothbury_with_St_Christopher_le_Stocks_and_St_Bartholomew_by_the_Exchange,_London_Genealogy#St_Bartholomew_by_the_Exchange_Parish)
The problem with a table like this is that the goal is to fill in the table, not include redundancy. Ancestry has these all indexed in their 'London, England, Church of England Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1538-1812' database.
Bartholomew, son, bap 19 June 1603
John Robinson, son, bap 16 December 1604
Jane Robinson, wife, bur 20 June 1605
Humphrey Robinson & Ann Piott mar 12 November 1605
John Robinson, son, bur 2 March 1605/6
Ann Robinson, dau bap 7 December 1606
taf
Thanks for those taf. I found early on that Humphrey Robinson was connected with St Bartholomew by the Exchange Parish, and, perhaps foolishly, I relied on that table in FamilySearch, as in the first instance indexes were more important than images, as I had no dates to work on. On that basis I subscribed to FMP, and when I put in 'Robinson' for any event in that parish 1605 +/- 20 years, I got zero hits. So much for the 'index'!
I have copies of all printed Visitations of Yorkshire in my digital library, and only put in the first link in my initial post, I should have tried a few other links.
Thanks again
Wibs
IF you want an email copy of the photo of the parish register records let me know.
That would be most appreciated Joe, thanks.

My email is: cDOTwithersATyahooDOTcoDOTuk

Wibs
2020-06-30 12:50:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by joseph cook
I just looked at the will of Batholomew Barnes. I see the four husbands of his four daughters mentioned, but I wouldn't assume the order listed is the same as the order he earlier lists his daughters.
Also, am I missing something or does the will say "three hundred pounds shall be paid to my daughter Maria Holland within two months..."
So, this means Maria was the wife of the earlier mentioned Bartholomew Holland, and Margaret was the wife of Maurice Abbott.
CHeers,
Joe C
Thanks Joe. I had assumed the order of the husbands was the same as the order of the daughters. I missed the later legacy to Maria Holland. So that one observation unblocked my contention that Margaret married twice, 1st to a Humphrey Robinson (but NOT the Humphrey Robinson who later married Anne Pyott and went to Thicket Priory), and 2nd to Maurice Abbott.

Would anyone disagree?
taf
2020-07-01 16:29:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wibs
As does Clay in his ‘Dugdale’s Visitation of Yorkshire with Additions’, Vol
III, (Exeter, 1917), p. 170, [Not viewable in the UK, except via a VPN].(https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=gri.ark:/13960/t9j41wf0k&view=1up&seq=5)
Can you see the Internet Archive without VPN? There are two copies there.

https://archive.org/details/dugdalesvisitati03dugd_0/page/n5/mode/2up
https://archive.org/details/dugdalesvisitati03dugd

taf
Loading...