Discussion:
Media fail to report Bible burning
(too old to reply)
jdyoung
2020-08-05 23:48:32 UTC
Permalink
by Dr. William Donohue

On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag. But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them.

We’ve waited a few days to see how many media outlets would report on
what happened. One did. There was not a single mention of it on any of
the broadcast or cable TV news shows. And aside from the New York
Post, no newspaper in the nation covered it. The only mention of it
was on the internet; a few TV commentators noted it as well.

Had it been the Quran that was burned, it is a sure bet the media
would have been all over it. Burning Islamic holy books would be
considered intolerant. But burning the Bible is not, and in some
quarters may even be seen as meritorious.

Besides the media blackout, the larger issue for Americans is what the
Bible burnings represent. What happened last weekend in Portland was a
mini-Hitlerian event, plain and simple.

On May 10, 1933, 40,000 people gathered in Berlin to hear Nazi
propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels instruct university students to burn
books deemed offensive to the regime. They proceeded to burn 25,000
volumes, including those written by Brecht, Einstein, Freud, and
Hemingway.

During Mao’s Zedong’s Cultural Revolution, 1966-76, the Communists
went on a tear burning books that undermined their efforts at thought
control. That was then. Now book burning is back with a vengeance:
books were burned last December and as recently as last month. Reports
have surfaced saying the Communists are “burning books and burying
Confucian scholars.”

Why are the young people, most of whom are white, burning the Bible in
Portland? For the same reason fascists and communists burn books—to
cleanse society of any thought that is contrary to theirs.

Rebecca Knuth is the author of two books on this subject. Books are
burned, she says, because they “are an embodiment of ideas and if you
hold extreme beliefs you cannot tolerate anything that contradicts
those beliefs or is in competition with them.” She says that by
burning books, “you are destroying your enemy and your enemy’s
beliefs.”

The enemy of the Portland Hitlerians is American society, which is why
they burn the flag. They also hate the Judeo-Christian ethos upon
which it is based, which is why they burn the Bible.

What do they offer as an alternative? Nothing. They are intellectually
spent, morally bankrupt and culturally deracinated. That is why they
resort to nihilism. The only thing they have going for them are their
allies in the media.


J Young
***@ymail.com
LinuxGal
2020-08-05 23:55:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by jdyoung
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag.
You mean the one the peckerwoods and rednecks shot at in
Charleston Harbor in 1861 and at Malvern Hill in 1862 and
Cemetery Ridge in 1863 and the Shenandoah Valley in 1864 and
Five Forks in 1865? That one?
Post by jdyoung
But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them.
Good. Good.
--
Linux Geeks: Smart. Single. Sexy.
Well, two out of three ain't bad!

https://twitter.com/LinuxGal
Jack Shit
2020-08-06 12:06:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by LinuxGal
Post by jdyoung
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag.
You mean the one the peckerwoods and rednecks shot at in
Charleston Harbor in 1861 and at Malvern Hill in 1862 and
Cemetery Ridge in 1863 and the Shenandoah Valley in 1864 and
Five Forks in 1865? That one?
Post by jdyoung
But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them.
Good. Good.
Thanks for your input Nazi.
alvey
2020-08-06 00:11:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by jdyoung
by Dr. William Donohue
I'm guessing that the above is this character;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Donohue

I'm also guessing that his "Dr" is an honourary from some Catholic
collective. Or possibly in 'Religious Looneyism'.

"Donohue believes marriage is "not about love" or "making people happy" but
that the whole purpose of marriage is to have a family.[23][24] Donohue is
divorced.[3]" Wikipedia



alvey
Wondering where religion rates in the list of 'Most Deaths Caused By'
rankings.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Michael Cole
2020-08-06 00:13:57 UTC
Permalink
I very much disapprove of burning bibles, or korans for that matter. It is a waste of perfectly good toilet paper.
John Locke
2020-08-06 00:33:32 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 17:13:57 -0700 (PDT), Michael Cole
Post by Michael Cole
I very much disapprove of burning bibles, or korans for
that matter. It is a waste of perfectly good toilet paper.
...not to mention the 2400 joints you could have rolled !


---------------------------------------------------------------------
"Fear paints pictures of ghosts and hangs them in the
gallery of ignorance" - Robert Green Ingersoll

"Nothing could be more idiotic and absurd than the
doctrine of the trinity" - Robert Green Ingersoll
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevrob
2020-08-06 02:22:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Locke
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 17:13:57 -0700 (PDT), Michael Cole
Post by Michael Cole
I very much disapprove of burning bibles, or korans for
that matter. It is a waste of perfectly good toilet paper.
...not to mention the 2400 joints you could have rolled !
Heh!

There are so many bibles in the US that you couldn't
possibly burn enough of them to make any practical difference.

The bookburners are making a strategic error. People on the fence
over the value of their protests will be dissuaded from listening
to their arguments. Burning books, burning the US flag and
destroying property create backlash. Initiating violence creates
even more.

BTW, that asshole Donohue has a Ph.D in sociology, from NYU,
which is private and secular. Other
than a US student calling a phud who is not a professor yet
"Dr" out of courtesy, people who use an academic title to
refer to someone not working in his or her field is utterly
pretentious. Just my humble opinion.

I took an undergraduate political science class from the
Catholic League's founder, Virgil Blum, S.J. He had a Ph.D.
in political science and taught in the Jesuit universities.
I had him for a Constitutional Law class, which was popular
with the "pre-law" crowd. It was far from a "gut," and woe
unto he who did not do the reading! Blum was an actual scholar.
Donohue quickly turned ito a polemicist and a PR flack.

One wonders how much rigor it took to earn a sociology degree
at NYU in the 8th decade of the last century. It's still a well-
regarded school, but it ain't Columbia.
--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Don Martin
2020-08-06 12:41:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
The bookburners are making a strategic error. People on the fence
over the value of their protests will be dissuaded from listening
to their arguments. Burning books, burning the US flag and
destroying property create backlash. Initiating violence creates
even more.
I have no problem with flag burning, given that nationalism has been
the cause of most of the wars of our times, but as a lit major, I do
object to burning books which is an extreme form of censorship against
unpopular ideas. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_book_burnings
What is unpopular is always in the opinion of the book burners, and
while I agree with the protestors that christianity has no business
manipulating secular governments to adopt its views and that its book
is full of bullshit, it is at least old bullshit. It is possible that
the plays of Euripides contain a good deal of bullshit, too, but
scholars mourn the fact that only 19 of them survive today, out of 90+
known to have been performed. Now, the rest were probably not burned,
but the medieval equivalent, the creation of palimpsests works almost
as well: scraping off the words in Greek (which the scraper was very
unlikely to be able to read) so the parchment could be filled with
christian homilies shows the same ideological hostility, and it was
responsible for our losing a huge amount of what was known in the
classical world. Even old bullshit is worth preservation.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
JWS
2020-08-06 12:55:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don Martin
Post by Kevrob
The bookburners are making a strategic error. People on the fence
over the value of their protests will be dissuaded from listening
to their arguments. Burning books, burning the US flag and
destroying property create backlash. Initiating violence creates
even more.
I have no problem with flag burning, given that nationalism has been
the cause of most of the wars of our times, but as a lit major, I do
object to burning books which is an extreme form of censorship against
unpopular ideas. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_book_burnings
What is unpopular is always in the opinion of the book burners, and
while I agree with the protestors that christianity has no business
manipulating secular governments to adopt its views and that its book
is full of bullshit, it is at least old bullshit. It is possible that
the plays of Euripides contain a good deal of bullshit, too, but
scholars mourn the fact that only 19 of them survive today, out of 90+
known to have been performed. Now, the rest were probably not burned,
but the medieval equivalent, the creation of palimpsests works almost
as well: scraping off the words in Greek (which the scraper was very
unlikely to be able to read) so the parchment could be filled with
christian homilies shows the same ideological hostility, and it was
responsible for our losing a huge amount of what was known in the
classical world. Even old bullshit is worth preservation.
My Boy Scout Handbook says the proper way to dispose
of a worn, dirty, or damaged flag is to burn it.
You don't just toss it in the garbage.
Kevrob
2020-08-06 18:53:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by JWS
My Boy Scout Handbook says the proper way to dispose
of a worn, dirty, or damaged flag is to burn it.
You don't just toss it in the garbage.
That's done, but not in a way as to attach disgrace to the symbol.

United States Code Title 4 Chapter 1 - The Flag, Section 8K states the following:

[/quote]

The flag, when it is in such condition that it is no longer a fitting emblem
for display, should be destroyed in a dignified way, preferably by burning.

[/quote]

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/4/8

[quote]

When a flag is so tattered that it no longer fits to serve as a symbol of
the United States, it should be replaced in a dignified manner. The Veterans
of Foreign Wars, American Legion, Boy Scouts of America, Girl Scouts of the
USA, TrailLife USA, the military and other organizations conduct dignified
flag-burning ceremonies.

[/quote] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Flag_Code

I would not prosecute anyone for the expression involved in
burning a flag. That has been upheld by the courts, and I
don't disagree with it. Anyone so doing needs to take as
much care with a burning flag as they would with anything
else they might burn.


If this generation of baby socialists had any education,
they might remember what Norman Thomas said:

"If you want a symbolic gesture, don't burn the flag;
wash it."

https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/norman_thomas_101644

As a libertarian, I disagreed with his policies, especially
on economics, but this was clever.

I also thought Romanians who cut the Communist coat of atms
from the socialist "republic's" flag was a great symbol.

Early "American" flags were often made by applying stripes
to existing British ensigns, defacing that flag, and making
something new.

https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/us-gu.html

(same as this East India Co flag, BTW)

Loading Image...

Good thing we came up with stars for Old Glory's canton,
back when it was still Very Young Glory.
--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Kevrob
2020-08-06 19:00:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by JWS
My Boy Scout Handbook says the proper way to dispose
of a worn, dirty, or damaged flag is to burn it.
You don't just toss it in the garbage.
That's done, but not in a way as to attach disgrace to the symbol.

United States Code Title 4 Chapter 1 - The Flag, Section 8K states the following:

[/quote]

The flag, when it is in such condition that it is no longer a fitting emblem
for display, should be destroyed in a dignified way, preferably by burning.

[/quote]

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/4/8

[quote]

When a flag is so tattered that it no longer fits to serve as a symbol of
the United States, it should be replaced in a dignified manner. The Veterans
of Foreign Wars, American Legion, Boy Scouts of America, Girl Scouts of the
USA, TrailLife USA, the military and other organizations conduct dignified
flag-burning ceremonies.

[/quote] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Flag_Code

I would not prosecute anyone for the expression involved in
burning a flag. That has been upheld by the courts, and I
don't disagree with it. Anyone so doing needs to take as
much care with a burning flag as they would with anything
else they might burn.


If this generation of baby socialists had any education,
they might remember what Norman Thomas said:

"If you want a symbolic gesture, don't burn the flag;
wash it."

https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/norman_thomas_101644

As a libertarian, I disagreed with his policies, especially
on economics, but this was clever.

I also thought Romanians who cut the Communist coat of atms
from the socialist "republic's" flag was a great symbol.

Early "American" flags were often made by applying stripes
to existing British ensigns, defacing that flag, and making
something new.

https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/us-gu.html

(same as this East India Co flag, BTW)

https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/g/gb~h1707.gif

Good thing we came up with stars for Old Glory's canton,
back when it was still Very Young Glory.
--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
rja.ca...@gmail.com
2020-08-06 09:30:26 UTC
Permalink
I very much disapprove of burning bibles, or korans for that matter. It is a waste of perfectly good toilet paper.
The bible is good for smoking, but smoking is deleterious.
Jack Shit
2020-08-06 12:09:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@gmail.com
I very much disapprove of burning bibles, or korans for that matter. It is a waste of perfectly good toilet paper.
The bible is good for smoking, but smoking is deleterious.
Nazis burned books and took away history.
Jack Shit
2020-08-06 12:08:41 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 17:13:57 -0700 (PDT), Michael Cole
Post by Michael Cole
I very much disapprove of burning bibles, or korans for that matter. It is a waste of perfectly good toilet paper.
Nazis burned books.
Davej
2020-08-06 00:24:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by jdyoung
[...]
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again...
...poked jdyoung in the ass with a sharp stick.
thinbluemime2
2020-08-06 00:32:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by jdyoung
by Dr. William Donohue
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag. But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them.
How does one go about in the dead of night acquiring boxes of bibles to
burn on a bonfire?

I'm asking for a friend.
Jack Shit
2020-08-06 12:11:35 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 20:32:24 -0400, thinbluemime2
Post by thinbluemime2
Post by jdyoung
by Dr. William Donohue
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag. But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them.
How does one go about in the dead of night acquiring boxes of bibles to
burn on a bonfire?
I'm asking for a friend.
I remember when the Beatles said they were more famous than Jesus and
people went out and bought there albums just so they could be seen
burning them. The Beatles made a shit load of money off of that. Now
the bible company's will clean up.
Adam H. Kerman
2020-08-06 01:21:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by jdyoung
by Dr. William Donohue
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag. But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them. . . .
Am I missing that these books were someone else's property? If one burns
one's own books, it's not censorship and it's not religious oppression.

I think I missed all of your followups in my threads about censorship,
but I suspect you don't truly care about the issue.
BTR1701
2020-08-06 02:39:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by jdyoung
by Dr. William Donohue
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag. But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them. . . .
Am I missing that these books were someone else's property? If one burns
one's own books, it's not censorship and it's not religious oppression.
I think I missed all of your followups in my threads about censorship,
but I suspect you don't truly care about the issue.
The article made a good point about the Quran, though. I remember years ago
when some pastor in Florida was going to hold a Quran burning, it was a
national news firestorm and there were calls for the courts to issue a
restraining order and for the police to intervene and stop him-- the 1st
Amendment be damned-- because it would 'inflame' a certain demographic prone
to bomb the shit out of anything they don't like at the slightest
provocation.

But a bunch of bibles get burned and the media reaction is 'meh'.
John Baker
2020-08-06 03:09:09 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 01:21:31 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by jdyoung
by Dr. William Donohue
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag. But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them. . . .
Am I missing that these books were someone else's property? If one burns
one's own books, it's not censorship and it's not religious oppression.
I think I missed all of your followups in my threads about censorship,
but I suspect you don't truly care about the issue.
He doesn't. "J" is one of our longest running and least intelligent
trolls here in aa. He'll post anything he thinks will piss off the
most people in whatever group he's trolling. He's been known to
contradict himself a dozen times in a single day. ;-)







AA #1898
Giver of No Fucks
Keeper of the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch
alvey
2020-08-06 06:35:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Baker
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 01:21:31 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by jdyoung
by Dr. William Donohue
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag. But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them. . . .
Am I missing that these books were someone else's property? If one burns
one's own books, it's not censorship and it's not religious oppression.
I think I missed all of your followups in my threads about censorship,
but I suspect you don't truly care about the issue.
He doesn't. "J" is one of our longest running and least intelligent
trolls here in aa. He'll post anything he thinks will piss off the
most people in whatever group he's trolling. He's been known to
contradict himself a dozen times in a single day. ;-)
Speaking of long-time nutters, is 'Dr' Jai Maharaja (sp?) still posting in
AA? I haven't seen his tosh anywhere I go for a while now?


alvey
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
John Baker
2020-08-13 05:28:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by alvey
Post by John Baker
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 01:21:31 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by jdyoung
by Dr. William Donohue
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag. But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them. . . .
Am I missing that these books were someone else's property? If one burns
one's own books, it's not censorship and it's not religious oppression.
I think I missed all of your followups in my threads about censorship,
but I suspect you don't truly care about the issue.
He doesn't. "J" is one of our longest running and least intelligent
trolls here in aa. He'll post anything he thinks will piss off the
most people in whatever group he's trolling. He's been known to
contradict himself a dozen times in a single day. ;-)
Speaking of long-time nutters, is 'Dr' Jai Maharaja (sp?) still posting in
AA? I haven't seen his tosh anywhere I go for a while now?
Neither have I, but then, I have most of the trolls and nutbars
killfiled. They just aren't as much fun to play with as they were when
I was younger. :-)
Post by alvey
alvey
Viktor Tandofsky
2020-08-13 05:35:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Baker
Post by alvey
Post by John Baker
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 01:21:31 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by jdyoung
by Dr. William Donohue
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag. But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them. . . .
Am I missing that these books were someone else's property? If one burns
one's own books, it's not censorship and it's not religious oppression.
I think I missed all of your followups in my threads about censorship,
but I suspect you don't truly care about the issue.
He doesn't. "J" is one of our longest running and least intelligent
trolls here in aa. He'll post anything he thinks will piss off the
most people in whatever group he's trolling. He's been known to
contradict himself a dozen times in a single day. ;-)
Speaking of long-time nutters, is 'Dr' Jai Maharaja (sp?) still posting in
AA? I haven't seen his tosh anywhere I go for a while now?
Neither have I, but then, I have most of the trolls and nutbars
killfiled. They just aren't as much fun to play with as they were when
I was younger. :-)
That's a good admission. You aren't serious about anything when you post. You're just a trolling asshole.
Don Martin
2020-08-13 20:03:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Baker
Post by alvey
Speaking of long-time nutters, is 'Dr' Jai Maharaja (sp?) still posting in
AA? I haven't seen his tosh anywhere I go for a while now?
Neither have I, but then, I have most of the trolls and nutbars
killfiled. They just aren't as much fun to play with as they were when
I was younger. :-)
The blow-up Bozo punching doll gets boring after a few thousand
knockouts. And it learns nothing from the experience.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
Don Martin
2020-08-06 12:41:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Baker
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 01:21:31 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Am I missing that these books were someone else's property? If one burns
one's own books, it's not censorship and it's not religious oppression.
I think I missed all of your followups in my threads about censorship,
but I suspect you don't truly care about the issue.
He doesn't. "J" is one of our longest running and least intelligent
trolls here in aa. He'll post anything he thinks will piss off the
most people in whatever group he's trolling. He's been known to
contradict himself a dozen times in a single day. ;-)
He does not simply retail his contradictions: he's a wholesaler!
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
jdyoung
2020-08-06 03:37:48 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 01:21:31 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by jdyoung
by Dr. William Donohue
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag. But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them. . . .
Am I missing that these books were someone else's property? If one burns
one's own books, it's not censorship and it's not religious oppression.
The point is they burnt Bibles. Had it been the Koran or Torah, the
media would have had a field day. Why the double standard?
Post by Adam H. Kerman
I think I missed all of your followups in my threads about censorship,
but I suspect you don't truly care about the issue.
J Young
***@ymail.com
alvey
2020-08-06 06:30:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Baker
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 01:21:31 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by jdyoung
by Dr. William Donohue
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag. But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them. . . .
Am I missing that these books were someone else's property? If one burns
one's own books, it's not censorship and it's not religious oppression.
The point is they burnt Bibles. Had it been the Koran or Torah, the
media would have had a field day. Why the double standard?
Because it's not. I don't recall any media infernos about muslims burning
their bible.


alvey
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
k***@gmail.com
2020-08-06 03:20:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by jdyoung
by Dr. William Donohue
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag. But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them.
We’ve waited a few days to see how many media outlets would report on
what happened. One did. There was not a single mention of it on any of
the broadcast or cable TV news shows. And aside from the New York
Post, no newspaper in the nation covered it. The only mention of it
was on the internet; a few TV commentators noted it as well.
Had it been the Quran that was burned, it is a sure bet the media
would have been all over it. Burning Islamic holy books would be
considered intolerant. But burning the Bible is not, and in some
quarters may even be seen as meritorious.
Besides the media blackout, the larger issue for Americans is what the
Bible burnings represent. What happened last weekend in Portland was a
mini-Hitlerian event, plain and simple.
On May 10, 1933, 40,000 people gathered in Berlin to hear Nazi
propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels instruct university students to burn
books deemed offensive to the regime. They proceeded to burn 25,000
volumes, including those written by Brecht, Einstein, Freud, and
Hemingway.
During Mao’s Zedong’s Cultural Revolution, 1966-76, the Communists
went on a tear burning books that undermined their efforts at thought
books were burned last December and as recently as last month. Reports
have surfaced saying the Communists are “burning books and burying
Confucian scholars.”
Why are the young people, most of whom are white, burning the Bible in
Portland? For the same reason fascists and communists burn books—to
cleanse society of any thought that is contrary to theirs.
Rebecca Knuth is the author of two books on this subject. Books are
burned, she says, because they “are an embodiment of ideas and if you
hold extreme beliefs you cannot tolerate anything that contradicts
those beliefs or is in competition with them.” She says that by
burning books, “you are destroying your enemy and your enemy’s
beliefs.”
The enemy of the Portland Hitlerians is American society, which is why
they burn the flag. They also hate the Judeo-Christian ethos upon
which it is based, which is why they burn the Bible.
What do they offer as an alternative? Nothing. They are intellectually
spent, morally bankrupt and culturally deracinated. That is why they
resort to nihilism. The only thing they have going for them are their
allies in the media.
J Young
Maybe there wasn't anything to report? It sounds like a made up story.

KRYOEL
Yap Honghor
2020-08-06 09:09:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by jdyoung
by Dr. William Donohue
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag. But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them.
It is nice for people to burn the con books....
Christopher A. Lee
2020-08-06 09:26:44 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 02:09:16 -0700 (PDT), Yap Honghor
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by jdyoung
by Dr. William Donohue
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag. But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them.
It is nice for people to burn the con books....
If he's insulted when people burn the Bible, it's his own fault for
wiping his religious bullshit in the faces of people he knows aren't
even closet Christians so routinely for so many years. It simply
treats him and his beliefs with the same contempt he shows
non-Christians.
Viktor Tandofsky
2020-08-06 11:36:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 02:09:16 -0700 (PDT), Yap Honghor
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by jdyoung
by Dr. William Donohue
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag. But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them.
It is nice for people to burn the con books....
If he's insulted when people burn the Bible, it's his own fault for
wiping his religious bullshit in the faces of people he knows aren't
even closet Christians so routinely for so many years. It simply
treats him and his beliefs with the same contempt he shows
non-Christians.
That's bullshit. I'm not a Christian and his statement of his beliefs does not bother me at all.
Yap Honghor
2020-08-07 01:03:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Viktor Tandofsky
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 02:09:16 -0700 (PDT), Yap Honghor
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by jdyoung
by Dr. William Donohue
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag. But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them.
It is nice for people to burn the con books....
If he's insulted when people burn the Bible, it's his own fault for
wiping his religious bullshit in the faces of people he knows aren't
even closet Christians so routinely for so many years. It simply
treats him and his beliefs with the same contempt he shows
non-Christians.
That's bullshit. I'm not a Christian and his statement of his beliefs does not bother me at all.
You are not bothered when you know his statement was a lie from the beginning???

Even when the eagles flying high above the sky, the weak animals on the ground know their intention! This of course, rules out the one we called Mad Joe!!!
Jack Shit
2020-08-06 12:14:08 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 02:09:16 -0700 (PDT), Yap Honghor
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by jdyoung
by Dr. William Donohue
On August 1, sometime after midnight, anarchists in Portland once
again burned the American flag. But this time they did something
different: they engaged in book burning. The book they chose was the
Bible. They burned boxes full of them.
It is nice for people to burn the con books....
Nazis burned books.
rja.ca...@gmail.com
2020-08-06 09:35:35 UTC
Permalink
Was it Catholic bibles, or the other kind, the ones that
Catholics enjoy burning? Along with the publishers.
JWS
2020-08-06 10:26:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@gmail.com
Was it Catholic bibles, or the other kind, the ones that
Catholics enjoy burning? Along with the publishers.
Books, pamphlets, even stacks of paper are difficult to burn.
The edges may burn, but paper is a good insulator against
the atmosphere. Insulation from heat and low oxygen content
keep fire from spreading to the interior of a book, Constant
stirring is required to thoroughly burn such material. The
result is not worth the effort. So I go with "did this even
really happen?".
Loading...