Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 21:12:50 -0800 (PST)
Subject: page51, 7-2, First Life started as a capacitor, perhaps also stars &
planets start that way/ Atom Totality textbook, 8th ed.
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 05:12:50 +0000
page51, 7-2, First life started as a capacitor, perhaps also stars & planets start that way/ Atom Totality textbook, 8th ed.
page51, 7-2, First Life started as a capacitor, perhaps also stars & planets start that way/ Atom Totality textbook, 8th ed.
7-2, First Life started as a capacitor, perhaps stars & planets as seed-dots are capacitors.
I believe the Dirac new radioactivities is true. It is the mechanism in which the Universe grows bigger. Never was there a Big Bang, but there is constantly a steady stream of neutrons and other particles shot from the Nucleus of the Atom Totality to all regions of Space to make astro bodies grow bigger. And it is likely that a capacitor was the seed-dot for which this shot matter is aimed for and which thus grows bigger. So we may have a link between how life and living grows and how the nonlife material universe grows, both tied to capacitors as first beginnings.
Now the theory of First Life as a capacitor or battery, was discovered by me while in hospital for a cancer operation in Spring of 2016. While in hospital, you think quite a bit about your life, your life realizing it is the final chapters. And before going into surgery for liposarcoma, the same cancer Feynman had, I had written so so very much about the Maxwell Equations and capacitors. Major discoveries in science are usually because you have concepts in play all around and frequently using those concepts, and in play so often, that it is hard to escape making a discovery that First Life was a capacitor/battery when you talk about Capacitors and think about capacitors for a full year leading up to the surgery and discovery. This is sort of important for schools, the schools you select. So if you go to a school where science is not pervasive, not discussed or done much, well, you are at a disadvantage. Sort of like being a swimmer, you have to be in the pool a lot.
Now in the title I hint of the idea that maybe planets start from a capacitor, say some atoms of hydrogen forming into molecules forming a capacitor. What I called Cosmic seeds in past editions of this textbook. So that the planet Earth or the Sun started out in Space billions and billions of years ago as a few atoms of hydrogen forming a capacitor and trapping inside itself magnepoles of .5MeV charge energy. Then these seeds grow from Dirac's radioactive neutron materialization, they grow larger in size and as they grow, they get more radioactive neutron spontaneous materialization RNSM. While the surrounding space gets little to no new growth in particles that come from the Atom Totality Nucleus. You see, there was no Big Bang, but rather growth from particles emitted from the Nucleus of the Atom Totality.
So as First Life comes from a capacitor, we can sort of see a parallel, that first stars and first planets were tiny capacitors that was then a channel, a pipeline, to the Nucleus of the Atom Totality and would grow into being a planet or star.
And, obviously this mechanism of how stars and planets grow, throws the silly and folly of the Nebular Dust Cloud of star and planet origins, throws that science-crap, out the window. And, good riddance.
But back to First Life, and let me give its history in this post, with its date time group.
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Theory of First Life in Universe, photon come to rest, Body as
Capacitor, DNA as 2 joined photons
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:17:43 +0000
Theory of First Life in Universe, photon come to rest, Body as Capacitor, DNA as 2 joined photons
Alright, this post is historic as I can now begin to see how first life was assembled.
Not historic in the sense that I had Photon = DNA in the 1990s, but historic in the sense that I can see for myself, and others can also, see how a LIght Wave turns into living organism.
Now it is fortuitous of this day 24AUG2016 that I start writing on this theory, because of what is happening on Jupiter with Juno satellite and the Red Spot and the funny lines on Europa suggesting that those are Algae.
And just last night I learned of a creature that was Magnetic, called Magnetotactic Bacteria as some of the oldest creatures on Earth going back to 1.9 billion years ago.
But another fortunate coincidence is the BBC talking about a Clay theory of life by chemist Graham Cairns-Smith written by reporter Martha Henriques. Now, my theory is vastly different from Graham's, for instead of clay crystals, my theory places the photon in the center of it all. I admire Graham's desire, desire to logically simplify the progression from nonlife to life, for which the Miller experiment of electricity in test tube yields organic molecules, as too complex and hard to get from nonlife to life. Clay crystals is better than Miller's organic soup. But clay crystals are still, far far away from the leap of nonlife turning into life.
How can we make the transition of Nonlife to Life the easiest possible means in the world?
Well, we have to go to the most perfect Ordered entity in existence. The Atom is the most perfect ordered entity and inside the atom lies Perpetual Motion in the form of photons. Photons are perfect entities because they are forever in motion at that highest speed possible. And, photons are perfect geometry of Double Transverse Waves.
^^^^^
vvvvv in xy plane and also in xz plane
__|__
| as a head-on view
Now the Double Helix of DNA does not look exactly like the head-on view of a photon but close >enough
And the 4 vector Magnetic fields of the photon are not exactly the A and the C and the G and the T of DNA, but close enough.
So, here is the perspective of the first creation of life on Earth, and it is also how life on Mars-- probably those magnetic bacteria and life on Jupiter and its moons first started.
SCENARIO:
1) a highly energetic photon, what we call gamma ray burst, came to rest on Earth. Some gamma rays pack as much energy as all the energy in a galaxy, so these gamma rays can be huge in energy. So much energy that one could come to rest as forming an entire multicellular creature, from photon to creature. But here, all we want is a photon to come to rest to build the most primitive life. So its internal parts of the photon, one becoming a what I call a "proton sheet" and the other parts becoming a "electron sheet" which in physics is called a Capacitor. The first life on Earth was a photon that became a Capacitor. Now it was not a circuit but a capacitor. And this capacitor is like the Magnetic Bacteria but it needs a means to grow from this one stopped photon into a Capacitor and now it needs to grow to be a Larger Capacitor. It needs to acquire more electrons on one of the parallel plates where electrons reside and more protons on the other parallel plate where protons reside (this would be great for the environment of Jupiter with its liquid hydrogen, even solid hydrogen). So, now, how to grow into being a larger capacitor? This is sort of a Pre-Photosynthesis, where plants get sunlight photons and turn those photons into energy and matter, basically add on hydrogen to there mass. But our Capacitor takes in sunlight photons, much like a plant does, but turns the photon into a electron on the electron plate of the capacitor. So the Capacitor is growing and is a precursor of Photosynthesis.
2) So far we have created first life-- A Capacitor and watching it grow by adding on more electrons to the plates, becoming a larger Capacitor. But it has a long ways to go to become a Unit, with a boundary or what we would call a coating or skin or sac or envelope to contain the capacitor. The capacitor would be on the inside of this coating this skin, this first single celled organism that has its capacitor inside a sac. So how does a capacitor that grows, get enclosed? We look at a Magnetic Bacteria, and the insides are a capacitor but the coating is a magnetic-field, a magnetite molecule.
More later,, this is tiring,,,,,,,
AP
Now in that above post of August 2016, I had not yet discovered the .5 MeV particle is not an electron but is a Monopole, and that capacitors store monopoles, not electrons, for the electron is the muon.
Then as the months rolled by and a report by the BBC about First Life, I posted the below.
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 02:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: FIRST LIFE theory-- physics capacitor is first life, textbook 2016,
by AP
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 09:11:35 +0000
FIRST LIFE theory-- physics capacitor is first life, textbook 2016, by AP
I am the discoverer of First Life as a physics capacitor. I discovered this theory while doing Maxwell Equations and being sick in the hospital with cancer. When you have cancer, many thoughts go towards biology, and First Life came from those thoughts.
Slowly I have been posting messages about this theory in the past months.
Tonight I read a article on BBC by Michael Marshall, 31OCT2016 titled "The secret of how life on Earth began" .
This BBC article was no doubt spurred on by my postings, Archimedes Plutonium of the past several months. Spurred on by my postings because I discovered that a Capacitor is self replicating. You can take any capacitor, cut it in half and have two capacitors. Take any life form and it reproduces another to have 2 of that life form. A capacitor has a "body" and enclosed sac to be a capacitor, thus a living cell.
So, I glanced down this article to see if any of those Early life theories refers to a capacitor.
If you scroll down to where they talk about Mitchell and ATP and ADP and quoting "Mitchell knew that the enzyme that makes ATP sits on a membrane. So he suggested that the cell was pumping charged particles called protons across the membrane, so that there were lots of protons on one side and hardly any on the other."
So, what Mitchell is talking about is a Capacitor, that ATP and ADP are capacitors.
Now earlier in this article was written about Oparin and his "coacervates" which are entities that act very much like living cells only these are inorganic.
Now, where I left off a month or more ago was that I was looking for a mineral on Earth some 4 billion years or more ago that is a carbon capacitor. I found that Graphene is a supercapacitor. But I have not yet found in minerology where graphene or graphite exists in deposits and where the best site of a carbon deposit to have carbon capacitors.
In this BBC article of coacervates, it is not mentioned whether coacervates are carbon graphite or graphene molecules. If they are, well, we have our first life entity.
Now a Capacitor as first life would have a body, have self replication and would have thus-- the ADP and ATP motor. So first life as capacitor would be a primitive model of a organism that divides, stores energy and releases energy to have mobility, and is contained in a sac or body.
Now, how does this Capacitor get the atoms inside its sac to build up nucleotides? The nucleotides of AT with CG form the bases of RNA and DNA. In fact each A and T and C and G are parallel strip capacitors. Now they need a insulator between the A, T, C, G. Is the insulator water?
Looking at DNA, it appears that there is nothing in between a AT or CG but stacks of them.
So, where I left off a month or so ago is wondering what mineral of Carbon would first life as capacitor be found. It has to be carbon because life is based on carbon and carbon forms supercapacitors.
If the insulator between AT, CG is water, then the first life has to be from water, such as ponds, lakes, oceans.
A capacitor is destroyed in heat. So first life was not in hot vents. In fact, capacitors like coldness more than heat. The first life capacitors need Sunlight to charge their capacitance, so this means near the surface of water.
Now since all life needs salt, it is likely that first life capacitors started in salty water, and salt water is good for capacitance.
BBC has done an excellent job of outlining the history of "first life theory" and I can craft my textbook upon that outline, so I know what is already out there.
The surprise though, in all of this is the fact that no-one mentioned in that long history, focused on the Physics of Capacitor. And only my luck that I was all focused on the Maxwell Equations that I saw that First Life was a capacitor.
And few biologists or chemists for that matter, focus on the Maxwell theory because of what? Because Maxwell theory is too difficult for most scientists, for the math scares them away.
So what I need to do in this textbook, is outline how a capacitor can absorb chemicals inside its body and turn those chemicals into a AT, CG capacitor. The first life capacitors were likely to be sheets of graphene sandwiched by water insulator forming a capacitor. As the capacitor absords different molecules, the sheets of graphene are replaced by a sheet of AT or CG.
So here we are talking of a evolution of graphene sheets to be AT or CG sheets. And eventually work our way to a RNA sheet and then a ribosome body inside the capacitor.
The environment that this takes place must be a water and still water type of environment with plenty of sunlight to charge the capacitor. The charging is for mobility, both inside and outside the body of the capacitor. Motion that is at minimum the slowest motion of a one celled organism.
Self replication of a capacitor is easy, in that a capacitor divided yields new life capacitors. Unlike the old theories that were hyper worried about self replication, when they should be more worried as to how graphene sheets evolved into better sheets of parallel plate capacitance.
Thanks BBC, for telling me the history of first life theory.
AP
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 04:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: FIRST LIFE theory-- physics capacitor is first life, textbook 2016,
by AP
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 11:04:07 +0000
Alright I discovered First Life's first eating and why a water environment is so crucial. When you have two small capacitors near one another and both charged they act like a mild magnet and move to one another until stuck together as one capacitor and that constitutes First Life act of eating even though it takes place outside the body. So being a capacitor allows for mobility and eating.
iPhone post
AP
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 14:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: First Meal of First Life and how magnetism becomes eating Re: FIRST
LIFE theory-- physics capacitor is first life, textbook 2016, by AP
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 21:10:15 +0000
First Meal of First Life and how magnetism becomes eating Re: FIRST LIFE theory-- physics capacitor is first life, textbook 2016, by AP
- show quoted text -
Now the world's first meal by First Life would have been one parallel plate capacitor eaten by another parallel plate capacitor and by eaten I mean both stuck to one another as a capacitor magnet. Now they will become unstuck as the charge inside of each drains or the temperature gets too high and thus unstuck.
But the First Eating by First Life is a process of magnetism where a capacitor sticks to another capacitor.
Now in physics, a capacitor has to be topologically have a torus shape where we can call the hole in the torus the mouth and if long enough hole, the other end the waste discharge hole.
So, Eating by First Life was a process of the magnetism of a Capacitor, which means the evolution of First Life had to be at a temperature cool enough that small capacitance allowed small magnetism. First Life could not endure warm or hot environment.
Now we can visualize how First Life as a Capacitor would gain a mouth and would gain internal organs that would be capacitors themselves, such as a ribosome, such as a capacitor of a AT or CG.
So that in a pool of water, is floating around Capacitors that are charged and slightly magnetic attracting one another and say a Graphene Capacitor is near to a AT capacitor or a CG capacitor or ribosome capacitor, and the Graphene is larger and proceeds to magnetically attract the smaller ribosome capacitor and so to speak eats the ribosome capacitor by the magnetism brings the capacitor inside and as it charges and recharges, the ribosome capacitor becomes more and more internal inside the Graphene magnetic capacitor.
Keep in mind, that the magnetic force waxes and wanes as it is charged daily by sunlight and by temperature.
In fact, we can do an experiment in the lab where we place such capacitors and follow their activities as they magnetize and move closer together and eat each other.
Now, the Eating of First Life is probably far more important than the replication of First Life because the Replication of First Life would be that the larger capacitor breaks off a piece of capacitor and both are now independent capacitors. And the funny thing is that the larger capacitor probably will eat the offspring smaller capacitor, the son or daughter capacitor eaten by the parent capacitor (talk about morals or ethics in first-life creatures).
So, we see here the scenario of how First Life would have had its First Meal and how it would eat its way into having internal organs-- more capacitors inside itself.
AP
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 14:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: First Meal of First Life and how magnetism becomes eating Re: FIRST
LIFE theory-- physics capacitor is first life, textbook 2016, by AP
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 21:36:33 +0000
First Meal of First Life and how magnetism becomes eating Re: FIRST LIFE theory-- physics capacitor is first life, textbook 2016, by AP
Now I am not sure here if the CO2 molecules are capacitors themselves? So that the world's first breathing would have been these molecules magnetic stuck inside a larger capacitor which then proceeds to chemically detach the C from the O2 and uses the C to build more organic molecules. Now is phosphorus a gas molecule so as a capacitor life can eat it and retrieve the P to start to build a ADP & ATP.
Here the idea is that the magnetism inside a capacitor builds new capacitors. Where magnetism builds RNA.
AP
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: First Life as a capacitor, we see eating is more important a feature
than is replication
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 01:34:10 +0000
First Life as a capacitor, we see eating is more important a feature than is replication
- show quoted text -
So we have First Life as a capacitor, and as it builds up charge, it can then "eat", that is, eat other capacitors as magnetism attracts one capacitor to another capacitor.
If the eaten capacitor is tiny and small, such as a microbe sized capacitor, then it can go inside the larger capacitor and be eaten as we normally think of eating. But if the two capacitors are of relatively the same size, the eating process is merely the two stuck side to side by magnetism.
Now, magnetism as charged parallel plate capacitors performing the stuck together by magnetism is a far far more important aspect of life than is the act of self replication or of reproduction. So in this theory of First Life, we easily can see that dividing a capacitor, will render two capacitors able to function as a capacitor, but the function of eating where a capacitor is stuck to another capacitor, and where discharging makes them unstuck until recharged and then eaten again, those actions of eating are far more important in evolution than the act of replication, because it is in the eating that we get enormous changes in capacitor configuration that would evolve from the most simple of capacitors to capacitors of AT and CG and ribosomes and also entire RNA molecules.
Now, we normally do not think of a plant as eating, because we view the plant as being hit by sunlight and the sunlight makes use of CO2 using the carbon to grow more plant. So we view the plant as eating Sunlight, not eating other entities. But, in a sense, is not the CO2 molecule a capacitor structure of molecule? And, is the O2 molecule a capacitor molecule? So that when the act of breathing occurs in Nature, what we really have going on, if analyzed to its utmost detail, is that the plant attracts the CO2 as a magnetic attraction and then through photosynthesis, renders the C apart from the O2 creating new capacitors inside the body of a large capacitor. So in a sense, every living body, every single living organism is just a capacitor, whether a complex capacitor like a human being or a simple capacitor like a virus or single celled organism.
And the most important function is not reproduction or self replication because all capacitors are able to replicate, but rather the function of highest importance is the function of charging the capacitor so that by magnetism it can eat other surrounding capacitors. And once those capacitors are inside the larger capacitor, the altering of the inside capacitors to form internal organs or to make better and more new capacitors.
So in this view, we can start First LIfe with just graphene capacitors, all built from carbon atoms, and then as these stick together forming larger capacitors, they can eat other surrounding molecules that are slightly charged with magnetism and transform their essential atoms of hydrogen, atoms of phosphorus, atoms of oxygen, atoms of nitrogen etc etc to transform those atoms into becoming a AT capacitor, or a CG capacitor or a ribosome capacitor.
So we can see how the entire Progression of Evolution of Life all goes in order due to capacitor and magnetism.
AP
Now I will be exploring First Life as a capacitor some more and more.
But the reader should sense that the key events of life is a skin like envelope and a separation of the "capacitor plates". So the surface and the volume of First Life is crucial, and it needs to perform as a Capacitor, holding electrical charge.
Then once formed and charged, then the act of Eating is natural in that a larger capacitor can be formed by two adjacent smaller capacitors. So this suggests the likely first act of eating.
And DNA can easily form from photons inside the capacitor, the charged particles inside. For a photon is a double helix and so is the DNA molecule.
Now movement is critical to life, and we can see how holding electricity inside itself would give way to some propulsion.
The growing of organelles inside a capacitor is easily seen as enhancing the electricity and magnetism, where the organelles are that of swallowed up small capacitors.
So all of this is very very exciting. We can imagine how first plant and first animal came to be, how the first sex organs came to be. And while in hospital for my cancer surgery, and looking at that horrible monster of a tumor from a picture, the ideas that later would come to mind, concerning Life, is that perhaps, many of our organs, if we trace them back in geological time, were organs that arose from cancers of what was then normal cells. So it is likely that many of our so called "present day organs" had in fact been borne of a cancer in the geological time past. This gives us a notion that cancer is never going to be eradicated, for cancer is life-giving itself. If not for cancer, we, humans would have never evolved. Looking at my tumor in that pan, I thought, that looks like a brain. Probably, our large sized brain, was a cancer of a small brain millions of years ago. Most every cancer kills its host. But some confer a advantage, that recurs in the offspring and with time become a normal organ that is vital. So, I think Medical Science should begin to look at cancer in a whole new different way.
One more story to relate on cancer. Years back, some 6 years or more, one of my cats had a cancer tumor growing out of his eye, one eye. And it grew and grew, so bad was it, that he had to be careful not to bang it into where he walked. Finally I could not bear it any more and laid him to rest. But watching it grow, it looked like an eyeball. So, with my own experience with cancer, looking back, the case can be made, that the world's first eyeballs, first seeing organs were cancers of normal cells. Cancers that were slow to grow, yet could sensor the world as eyes upon the world. Of course, this would give large advantage to its owner in securing mates and having offspring, who, then would be more prone in inheriting this same cancer and we see how accelerated evolution is caused because cancer is acceleration of change. In biology they have accelerated evolution but no clue as to why you have that. Well, here is likely a reason for that-- cancer as a natural process of life, causes accelerated evolution. Just in one lifespan of a cat, if it had no eyes, that tumor could have been some light gathering of the environment, and then if that cat had given many offspring, soon we would have a "seeing cat evolve".
Commentary--
In the last several pages I am going to try to improve on these proofs that Real Electron= muon.
So far I have 11 proofs, but need to work on them and add some more. And then given a year rest away from physics, I should have the list very clear when I come back.
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 13:45:39 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Proofs that the Real Electron=muon and that the .5MeV particle was
the magnetic monopole, afterall
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 21:45:40 +0000
Proofs that the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV, and that the .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole, after all
by Archimedes Plutonium
13 PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon
by Archimedes Plutonium
Proofs that the Real Electron=muon and that the .5MeV particle was the magnetic monopole, afterall
PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon
1st proof is chemical bonding cannot exist with momentum of 938 versus .5MeV
Chemical Bonds are covalent, ionic, metallic. You simply cannot get atoms to bond if the electron is thought of as the .5MeV particle, only with a muon at 105 MeV and the proton at 840 MeV with neutron at 945 MeV do you have the physics of angular momentum that allows bonding in Chemistry. The .5MeV particle was, all along a magnetic monopole of a photon with .5 MeV charge energy, not rest mass energy.
2nd proof with the direct observance some years back in Poland of a 840 Mev particle along with 105 MeV particle of the hydrogen atom.
Hello, well i found the below on the internet. I need a 840MeV particle that is the Real Proton. I have asked to look for it in the production of Muons. Is the below a production of muons along with 840 MeV particles?
Quoting
Indication For A Broad J(pc) = 2++ Meson At 840-mev Produced In The Reaction Pi- P ---> Pi+ Pi- N At High |t|
K. Rybicki, I. Sakrejda (Cracow, INP)
1985 - 10 pages
Z.Phys. C28 (1985) 65-74
DOI: 10.1007/BF01550250
Abstract (Springer)
The reaction π−p→π+π−n has been studied at 17.2 GeV/c and 63 GeV/c. A partial wave analysis shows a fairly broad (∼250 MeV) resonance at about 840 MeV. This object, already visible in moments of the angular distribution, is produced in theD wave with helicitym=2 via unnatural exchange. The cross section for the reaction π−p→D2U(840)n is only by an order of magnitude lower than that of ϱ(770) and falls likepLAB−2.1±0.3. We have not been able to explain this object by systematic experimental effects like acceptance and/orN* reflections; neither is the nature of the resonance (if real) clear to us.
--- end quote ---
3rd proof-- pull plug out of electrical socket and notice light flash. That flash of light was the magnetic monopoles as photons with charge energy of .5MeV, for the monopoles compose all electric currents.
4th proof is that the radius of the hydrogen proton shrinks too much when a muon is injected and that contradicts Standard Model. The reason is obvious-- the proton is 840 MeV electron is muon and then you add a second muon.
--- Quoting from www, Ars Technica, Researchers orbit a muon around an atom, confirm physics is broken ---
So, the proton radius puzzle remains a puzzle. The team behind this new work point to a number of measurements that could potentially help clarify it. Some of them involve better measurements with normal electrons; others involve scattering muons off protons themselves to see if there's an unknown force at work. The latter would tell us whether anything beyond the Standard Model will be needed to explain this puzzle.
--- end Quote ---
5th proof electrochemical battery is not explainable as Faraday law unless you concede the battery is a thrusting bar magnet, and thus, the battery is explained as a dipole magnet of the anode and cathode and the electrolyte solution is the ferromagnetism of spins all lined up. And thus a current in the circuit is because the battery as a thrusting magnet forces monopoles down the circuit wire.
6th proof, spin is charge, and charge is spin and the only particle for that is a ratio of permittivity to permeability as that of 10^-6/ 10^-12 is a charge energy of 10^6 or 1 MeV for photon charge energy, and that leaves the proton, electron=muon, monopole with .5MeV charge energy.
7th proof the Maxwell Equations are not symmetrical without current being the flow of magnetic monopoles.
8th proof, now, a straightforward proof that the muon is the real-electron can come from ion theory. The trouble is that weeding out a proof of electron = muon, is that we get entangled with the magnetic monopole. So, the proof is simple for ion theory, to prove the muon = real electron. Take for example iron Fe atoms, they are 26 protons, 26 electrons=muons
Now iron has ion states of -4, -2, -1, +1, +2, +3, +4, +5 +6, +7
So, suppose the electron = .5MeV particle and not the 105 MeV particle
That would mean Iron can exist as iron with 26 protons and only 19 electrons at one extreme and 26 protons and 30 electrons at the other extreme.
Now in Maxwell theory, there is a law that enforces Conservation of Energy, called the Lenz law in Faraday law. Otherwise, you have unlimited energy and Nature does not have unlimited energy.
So that in atoms, the protons become a thrusting bar magnet and the electrons= real-electrons are the closed loop of wire (inert gases are closed loop wires and why bonding exists is to close the loop of real-electron structure).
So, the proof that .5MeV are not electrons, is that iron bonds readily with other iron forming a compound of iron, the metal iron and metallic bond is due to iron atoms wanting to close the loop of their 26 Real Electrons. They close that loop by the metallic bond. That means, the existence of ions from -4 to +7 is unrelated altogether from Electron configuration. That ions are some other particle behavior but not the electron nor proton behavior.
The reason iron exists as iron from Fe-4 to Fe+7 is that the particle .5MeV is a surface interloper particle of atoms, it is a add-on particle not the integral electron of atoms. If the monopole were the electron we break conservation of energy by all these interlopers. The reason the chemical table is all built around the inert gases, is because Faraday's law must be obeyed and thus atoms with a closed loop of their electrons seek no bonding of electrons= muons. But atoms that have no closed loop of their muons, seek that closed loop structure and thus, they form covalent, ionic, metallic bonds with other muons of other atoms.
Brief course on IONS in New Physics, for all of Physics and Chemistry are changed with the revelation that the REAL ELECTRON is the muon particle and REAL PROTON is 840 MeV.
So, this pretty much changes everthing in chemistry, everything.
Ion states
oxidation states Fe -4 to +7 although +2, +3 most common
Now, Fe+2 means the iron atom has 2 magnetic monopoles of + charge present
The Fe-2 ion of iron means it has 2 magnetic monopoles of - charge present
The hydrogen atom has ions of -1 to +1, H+1 means it has 1 proton of 840MeV, 1 electron of 105 MeV, and one magnetic monopole of +1 charge of .5MeV
H-1 means a hydrogen atom as ion has 1 proton of 840 MeV, 1 electron of 105 MeV and one magnetic monopole of -1 charge of .5MeV
Oxygen has oxidation states (ion states) of +2, +1, -1, -2.
O+2 means oxygen with 8 protons each of 840 MeV, 8 electrons each of 105 MeV, and 2 magnetic monopoles each of +1 electric charge of .5MeV
So, as I was saying so much before, how silly and stupid physicist were to think for a single moment, that you take loads and loads of classroom time studying momentum, and at the end of it all, you think the atom is a electron of .5MeV while proton is 938 MeV and you expect chemical bonding to occur under those circumstances. If you had a marble as the electron and a bowling ball as the proton, how in heaven's name are you so deranged in thinking that the momentum of the marble and bowling ball is going to form chemical bonds?
But the flip side of that ignorance is ION theory. To think for one moment, that an iron atom can lose 7 electrons, yes, mind you, 7 whole electrons and you got to be a crazy physicist /chemist to think that you still have an iron atom. A logical person, a logical chemist, would say, Fe+7 is a iron atom that has 26 protons each 840MeV and 26 electrons each 105 MeV and what the +7 is, is 7 magnetic monopoles each of +1 charge at .5MeV apiece.
So, the failure of Physics and Chemistry in the past 100 years, was a failure to recognize what physics is mostly about-- momentum, and that a marble to a bowling ball is not going to be a hydrogen atom or entering into Chemical bonding. A bowling ball with a 1/8 bowling ball, is going to be an atom. And that if you have an atom, it is not going to give up any of its protons or electrons easily, which means the unbalanced charges-- ions of atoms, is not a loss or gain of electrons, for the electrons rarely get out of any atom. But rather the unbalanced charges is due to a particle that Dirac chased after all of his life-- the Magnetic Monopole.
And everytime a atom is unbalanced in charge, is due to a buildup of monopoles on that atom.
9th Proof. In Chemistry, it is rare, that a atom loses or gains any Real-Electron=muon.
And that is a 9th proof that Real Electron=muon, that beta decay in Old Physics, was not the electron of atoms but the transfer of Magnetic Monopoles.
The only real radioactive decay mode is the helium nucleus-- alpha decay
But there is never a Real Electron decay for that would mean muons spewed out of atoms. Nor do we see protons spewed out of atoms, Real Proton = 840 MeV. The so called hydrogen nucleus of a 938 MeV is not radioactive decay, for it is still a 840 proton + 105 muon = hydrogen atom.
10th Proof. Well, I spoke of the internal heart or core of the concept of Chemistry, that the proton/s and electron/s are two parts of the Faraday Law. The protons are the thrusting bar magnet and the electrons= muons forms the closed loop of wire. Essentially that is the heart and core of atomic physics, a replay of Faraday's law with protons and electrons.
But, however, the electrons= muons only forms a closed loop wire for Faraday's law in the inert gases, the helium, neon, argon, etc and all other atoms want to have that closed loop configuration. Thus, is borne the Chemistry of bonding. Chemistry is borne. So that one atom without a closed loop configuration bonds with another atom to achieve that goal. So chemistry bonding is that of muons bonded to other muons in different atoms.
Now, can these .5 MeV particles fulfill the atoms need to make their muons a closed loop? Obviously not, because ions of atoms such as Fe, iron, swing from -4 to +7 in ions, so that proves ions cannot solve a atom's problem of its electron structure being less than closed loop. Only muons of other atoms can fulfill a atom's need to be closed loop.
11th Proof. Solving the Muon Magnetic Moment Anomaly, alongside proton radius shrunk
--- Quoting from www, Ars Technica, Researchers orbit a muon around an atom, confirm physics is broken ---
So, the proton radius puzzle remains a puzzle. The team behind this new work point to a number of measurements that could potentially help clarify it. Some of them involve better measurements with normal electrons; others involve scattering muons off protons themselves to see if there's an unknown force at work. The latter would tell us whether anything beyond the Standard Model will be needed to explain this puzzle.
--- end Quote ---
Now in re-reading that Ars article on proton radius shrinking when a hydrogen atom of 840 MeV proton with electron = 105 MeV and then a second muon is tried to be compounded-- will of course, shrink the proton radius for the two muons with 1 proton all three are centered at the center of the proton.
But in re-reading was mentioned an anomaly I was not familiar with-- Muon Magnetic Moment Anomaly.
And reading some results of that, I find surprizing for it was Feynman who claimed Electrodynamics was the supreme physics theory in accuracy of prediction.
But the anomaly is off by a mere .1%, which seems very very small to be not even an anomaly. Trouble is, the electron of Old Physics was found to be so accurate as to be described as physic's most precise finding ever, and that makes the .1% discrepancy ever so much larger.
Now, I was able to explain away the proton radius anomaly because the proton is not 938 MeV but is 840 MeV and the electron is not the .5MeV particle but rather is 105 MeV.
So, can I explain away the Muon Magnetic Moment Anomaly. I believe I can easily. For if you consider that what Old Physics measured as the electron magnetic moment was none other than the monopole as a dressed up photon magnetic moment. And it is easily seen that in EM theory the permeability constant is "exact" no uncertainty at 1.26*10^-6 H/m.
So, it is no wonder that Old Physics thought their electron magnetic moment in Quantum Electrodynamics was so ultra ultra precise-- for, they never measured the magnetic moment of the electron, but instead a magnetic monopole of the dressed up .5 MeV particle.
Then, when it came time to measure the magnetic moment of the muon, the real-true-electron, there is this .1% discrepancy, but there are discrepancies in the proton and neutron etc.
So, once we realized the Real Electron is the muon, afterall, there is no magnetic moment anomaly.
12th proof -- Static Electricity Re: Proofs that the Real Electron=muon
Alright, I need a 12th proof, for I do not want to neglect what is probably our first encounter with electricity-- static electricity. As we walk across a carpet and touch something we experience a spark. Trouble with static electricity, is that the concept makes out the atom as a flimsy structure, really really flimsy structure that electrons of atoms can be picked off so easily, and from very many diverse materials. One would think the structure of atoms was built of stronger stuff. And that is what the Electron = Muon concept is about, that it is so very very hard to separate a electron from its atom, just like separating a proton out of a nucleus. So the subject of static electricity is this interloper particle, this surface superficial particle that is easily "whipped up" as the magnetic monopole, just as easy as producing electricity in a Faraday Law demonstration of a thrusting bar magnet in closed loop of wire. For, we can easily imagine that our walk across a carpet is similar to a thrusting bar magnet and then the closed loop wire is when we touch something, having built up some monopoles in our body.
Old Physics would say that we picked up electrons on the carpet, and as we touch something, remit that imbalance of electrons.
New Physics would say that we picked up magnetic monopoles.
Now let us look at other static electric experiments. For when we rub a glass rod (+1) with silk, or rub a plastic rod (-1) with wool. Here again, Old Physics would say we pick off electrons of atoms.
New Physics would say, no, the atoms are still composed of all their electrons and protons. The only thing changed with the rubbing is that energy of the rub transfers to the magnetic monopole energy-- packets of .5MeV monopoles of charge energy. And the energy of rubbing becomes monopoles. These are those closed Lines of Force of a magnet, and the moment we touch something these stored up monopoles, flow from our body to that of the touched object.
How is that a proof the electron = muon?
Simple, in that the carpet, or plastic rod (-1) with wool or glass rod (+1) with silk, are materials that are electrically neutral substances, for the rubbing action was transformed not into free electrons, but was formed into monopoles. These substances remain electrically neutral, and the only change is that the rub created magnetic monopoles-- some + charged monopoles, some - charged monopoles, and these monopoles are superficial to the atoms where they formed.
Static Electricity is merely stored monopoles. Monopoles are conservation of energy, for the rubbing had to be transformed into some energy packets and that is-- monopoles of charge energy.
In the experiment of where we pick up bits of paper from either the glass rod or the plastic rod due to static electricity. What is happening here, is that the rod is not involved with the Real Electrons of atoms, but is involved with the superficial surface charged particle that is the magnetic monopole.
Now the electroscope is explained much much easier with magnetic monopoles rather than the silly electrons on one leaf pushing away the electrons on the second leaf.
For consider instead a closed loop line of force between the two leafs
/\
O
Where the leafs start out as ||
Then comes the charged rod of monopoles sending down a monopole closed loop O that pushes apart the two leafs.
Now i have two gold leafs and if true should leave the push apart looking more like this () rather than this /\. And that is what i have ()
13) Proof came in February 2018 for AP's ion theory, that ions are monopoles .5MeV either +1 or -1 charge, attached to a 840MeV proton and 105MeV muon as hydrogen.
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 19:37:37 -0800 (PST)
Subject: H+1 bonds to P+1 Re: EXPERIMENTAL PROOF Re: Hydrogen is the very best
way to prove AP's ION theory Re: proving AP's ion theory
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 03:37:37 +0000
H+1 bonds to P+1 Re: EXPERIMENTAL PROOF Re: Hydrogen is the very best way to prove AP's ION theory Re: proving AP's ion theory
Below is an experiment done in Denmark where it is shown that H+1 bonds to P+1 ions, proving not only that the Muon is the real-electron and that ions are magnetic monopoles, but, in addition, proving that like charges attract, for in Nature, attraction force is the only force existing and that what appears to be repel is merely-- denial of same space occupancy.
Positively Charged Phosphorus as a Hydrogen Bond Acceptor
Anne S. Hansen, Lin Du and Henrik G. Kjaergaard*
Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Vol. 5: , Issue. 23, : Pages. 4225-4231
Publication Date (Web): November 19, 2014
https://doi.org/10.1021/jz502150d
Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH
ELECTRON= muon of 231Pu
::\ ::|:: /::
::\::|::/::
_ _
(:Y:)
- -
::/::|::\::
::/ ::|:: \::
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy.
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium