RESEARCH

[BOZ]

Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."

FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

[mainframetech]

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Nope. Wrong! You do NOT know that only one stranger entered the TSBD
before the shooting. Any number may have entered and just not been seen.
As for instance when everyone was concentrating on what was going on
outside the windows, anyone might have snuck in behind them through the
loading dock door and ran up the stairs to the 6th floor with rifles,
fired on the motorcade and ran back down while everyone was looking at the
chaos outside in the street. Of course, leaving the MC rifle so that the
blame fell on Oswald.

You also do NOT know that Oswald fired the MC rifle at any time. The
only person that said Oswald did that was compromised and admitted it in
his autobiography.

Chris

[Anthony Marsh]

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

[BOZ]

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

You will never figure this thing out. Your reasoning is not logical.

[Jason Burke]

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

You will never figure this thing out. Your reasoning is not logical.

Scary thing is that Anthony Anthony *has* figured this thing out. But it
doesn't mesh with his preconceived notions^h^h^h^h^h^h^h fantasies.

So he *has* to blather on and on.

[Anthony Marsh]

Post by Jason Burke

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

You will never figure this thing out. Your reasoning is not logical.

Scary thing is that Anthony Anthony *has* figured this thing out. But it
doesn't mesh with his preconceived notions^h^h^h^h^h^h^h fantasies.
So he *has* to blather on and on.

Maybe you haven't been here long enough to see all my messages. I have
said repeatedly that I have changed my theories over the years as I found
more evidence. I used to think the motive was the Vietnam War. But the
evidence was not there. I used to think that maybe silencers were used,
but the acoustical evidence rules that out. I used to think that there
might have been 6 shots, but the acoustical evidence only shows 5.

I used to think that there was not enough proof to claim it is a fact that
the grassy knoll shot hit JFK in the head. But the leak of the autopsy
photos confirms the bullet hole in the forehead, not in the back of the
head.

[donald willis]

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by Jason Burke

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

You will never figure this thing out. Your reasoning is not logical.

Scary thing is that Anthony Anthony *has* figured this thing out. But it
doesn't mesh with his preconceived notions^h^h^h^h^h^h^h fantasies.
So he *has* to blather on and on.

Maybe you haven't been here long enough to see all my messages. I have
said repeatedly that I have changed my theories over the years as I found
more evidence. I used to think the motive was the Vietnam War. But the
evidence was not there. I used to think that maybe silencers were used,
but the acoustical evidence rules that out. I used to think that there
might have been 6 shots, but the acoustical evidence only shows 5.
I used to think that there was not enough proof to claim it is a fact that
the grassy knoll shot hit JFK in the head. But the leak of the autopsy
photos confirms the bullet hole in the forehead, not in the back of the
head.

I'd like more on this, from all sides, if at all possible. Somehow I
missed the "leak".... Is this on the level???

dcw

[Anthony Marsh]

Post by donald willis

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by Jason Burke

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

You will never figure this thing out. Your reasoning is not logical.

Scary thing is that Anthony Anthony *has* figured this thing out. But it
doesn't mesh with his preconceived notions^h^h^h^h^h^h^h fantasies.
So he *has* to blather on and on.

Maybe you haven't been here long enough to see all my messages. I have
said repeatedly that I have changed my theories over the years as I found
more evidence. I used to think the motive was the Vietnam War. But the
evidence was not there. I used to think that maybe silencers were used,
but the acoustical evidence rules that out. I used to think that there
might have been 6 shots, but the acoustical evidence only shows 5.
I used to think that there was not enough proof to claim it is a fact that
the grassy knoll shot hit JFK in the head. But the leak of the autopsy
photos confirms the bullet hole in the forehead, not in the back of the
head.

I'd like more on this, from all sides, if at all possible. Somehow I
missed the "leak".... Is this on the level???

The leak was James Fox leaking the JFK autopsy photos to JFK conspiracy
researchers.

Post by donald willis
dcw

[BOZ]

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by Jason Burke

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

You will never figure this thing out. Your reasoning is not logical.

Scary thing is that Anthony Anthony *has* figured this thing out. But it
doesn't mesh with his preconceived notions^h^h^h^h^h^h^h fantasies.
So he *has* to blather on and on.

Maybe you haven't been here long enough to see all my messages. I have
said repeatedly that I have changed my theories over the years as I found
more evidence. I used to think the motive was the Vietnam War. But the
evidence was not there. I used to think that maybe silencers were used,
but the acoustical evidence rules that out. I used to think that there
might have been 6 shots, but the acoustical evidence only shows 5.
I used to think that there was not enough proof to claim it is a fact that
the grassy knoll shot hit JFK in the head. But the leak of the autopsy
photos confirms the bullet hole in the forehead, not in the back of the
head.

YOU HAVE MANY SCREWED UP THEORIES. HSCA SAYS ACOUSTICAL EVIDENCE REVEALS 4
SHOTS. HOW CAN YOU AGREE WITH THEM IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THE NUMBER OF
SHOTS?

[Jason Burke]

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by Jason Burke

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

You will never figure this thing out. Your reasoning is not logical.

Scary thing is that Anthony Anthony *has* figured this thing out. But it
doesn't mesh with his preconceived notions^h^h^h^h^h^h^h fantasies.
So he *has* to blather on and on.

Maybe you haven't been here long enough to see all my messages. I have
said repeatedly that I have changed my theories over the years as I found
more evidence. I used to think the motive was the Vietnam War. But the
evidence was not there. I used to think that maybe silencers were used,
but the acoustical evidence rules that out. I used to think that there
might have been 6 shots, but the acoustical evidence only shows 5.
I used to think that there was not enough proof to claim it is a fact that
the grassy knoll shot hit JFK in the head. But the leak of the autopsy
photos confirms the bullet hole in the forehead, not in the back of the
head.

YOU HAVE MANY SCREWED UP THEORIES. HSCA SAYS ACOUSTICAL EVIDENCE REVEALS 4
SHOTS. HOW CAN YOU AGREE WITH THEM IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THE NUMBER OF
SHOTS?

It's a new day.
Time for Anthony Anthony to change his fantasy.
Again.

Personally, I think the bus driver mighta done it.

Speaking of which, I'll be smacking ol' Ralphie Boy upside the head on
Sunday as I leave the PA.

[Anthony Marsh]

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by Jason Burke

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

You will never figure this thing out. Your reasoning is not logical.

Scary thing is that Anthony Anthony *has* figured this thing out. But it
doesn't mesh with his preconceived notions^h^h^h^h^h^h^h fantasies.
So he *has* to blather on and on.

Maybe you haven't been here long enough to see all my messages. I have
said repeatedly that I have changed my theories over the years as I found
more evidence. I used to think the motive was the Vietnam War. But the
evidence was not there. I used to think that maybe silencers were used,
but the acoustical evidence rules that out. I used to think that there
might have been 6 shots, but the acoustical evidence only shows 5.
I used to think that there was not enough proof to claim it is a fact that
the grassy knoll shot hit JFK in the head. But the leak of the autopsy
photos confirms the bullet hole in the forehead, not in the back of the
head.

YOU HAVE MANY SCREWED UP THEORIES. HSCA SAYS ACOUSTICAL EVIDENCE REVEALS 4
SHOTS. HOW CAN YOU AGREE WITH THEM IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THE NUMBER OF
SHOTS?

How? By analyzing one match they threw out thinking it was too soon
after another, better match.

[Anthony Marsh]

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

You will never figure this thing out. Your reasoning is not logical.

I have done more research than you have.

[OHLeeRedux]

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

You will never figure this thing out. Your reasoning is not logical.

I have done more research than you have.

I do the world's greatest research. It's incredible. Nobody does better
research than me. [Your starting to sound like your buddy, Trump, Mr.
Marsh.]

[Anthony Marsh]

Post by OHLeeRedux

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

You will never figure this thing out. Your reasoning is not logical.

I have done more research than you have.

I do the world's greatest research. It's incredible. Nobody does better
research than me. [Your starting to sound like your buddy, Trump, Mr.
Marsh.]

More cheap slander. Any American who has been in this newsgroup for more
than a month knows that I detest Trump.

And if you want to pretend to be an American learn the difference
between "your" and "you're."

[OHLeeRedux]

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by OHLeeRedux

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

You will never figure this thing out. Your reasoning is not logical.

I have done more research than you have.

I do the world's greatest research. It's incredible. Nobody does better
research than me. [Your starting to sound like your buddy, Trump, Mr.
Marsh.]

More cheap slander. Any American who has been in this newsgroup for more
than a month knows that I detest Trump.

And anyone with an intellectual level above that of a junior high school
child would recognize the irony in what I said.

But you do sound exactly like Trump when you start emptying your mindless
drainage here. "I have the files. You don't. My files are the best files
ever. These are fantastic files. Absolutely incredible."

Anthony "Trump Man" Marsh.

Like your new nickname? You're welcome.

[BOZ]

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

You will never figure this thing out. Your reasoning is not logical.

I have done more research than you have.

MAYBE. YOU HAVE MADE MORE ASSUMPTIONS THAN I HAVE. HAVE YOU BEEN TO
DALLAS?

[Jason Burke]

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

You will never figure this thing out. Your reasoning is not logical.

I have done more research than you have.

MAYBE. YOU HAVE MADE MORE ASSUMPTIONS THAN I HAVE. HAVE YOU BEEN TO
DALLAS?

Evidently the bus doesn't go there.

[Anthony Marsh]

Post by Jason Burke

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

You will never figure this thing out. Your reasoning is not logical.

I have done more research than you have.

MAYBE. YOU HAVE MADE MORE ASSUMPTIONS THAN I HAVE. HAVE YOU BEEN TO
DALLAS?

Evidently the bus doesn't go there.

Is that the 63 bus?

[Anthony Marsh]

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

You will never figure this thing out. Your reasoning is not logical.

I have done more research than you have.

MAYBE. YOU HAVE MADE MORE ASSUMPTIONS THAN I HAVE. HAVE YOU BEEN TO
DALLAS?

Never. Too painful.

[Steve M. Galbraith]

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

So the correct way to think - your way - is to assume someone with a rifle walked into the building, went up six flights of steps, waited until JFK passed by, shot him, and then left. All unseen.

That's how we should be thinking this one through?

Stupid us with all of this talk about evidence and facts and logic.

Clearly, we're confused as to how to figure this out.

[Anthony Marsh]

Post by Steve M. Galbraith

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

So the correct way to think - your way - is to assume someone with a rifle walked into the building, went up six flights of steps, waited until JFK passed by, shot him, and then left. All unseen.

You are describing what you think Oswald did.
No one saw him shooting.

Post by Steve M. Galbraith
That's how we should be thinking this one through?

Do you ALWAYS see the sniper when he is shooting at his victim.
Is that what they are taught in sniper school?

Post by Steve M. Galbraith
Stupid us with all of this talk about evidence and facts and logic.

YOU don't have any. You did not prove that the Zapruder film is genuine
and thus we can rely on it for evidence. I did.

Post by Steve M. Galbraith
Clearly, we're confused as to how to figure this out.

Clearly your only reason for being here is to make personal attacks on
me. You think if you destroy me then YOUR argument must be accepted as
true. Don't be a Harris. Is he now considered to be a current poster so
that you can call him a liar and a criminal?
Does he beat his dog?

[BOZ]

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

MARSH DID YOU KNOW THAT 11 CIA officers grew long hair AND infiltrateD
peace groups in the United States.The agency compiled a computer index of
300,000 names of American people and organizations, and extensive files on
7,200 citizens. It began working secretly with police departments all over
THE USA.

[Anthony Marsh]

Post by BOZ

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by BOZ
Godwin Colibao: "In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of
research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the
advancement of knowledge."
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW THAT ONLY ONE STRANGER ENTERED THE TSBD BEFORE THE
SHOOTING. WE KNOW THAT OSWALD BROUGHT A LARGE PACKAGE. WE KNOW HE DID NOT
BRING CURTAIN RODS. WE KNOW HE BROUGHT HIS RIFLE. WE KNOW HE SHOT JFK.

Just ASSuMPTIONS, not proof.

MARSH DID YOU KNOW THAT 11 CIA officers grew long hair AND infiltrateD
peace groups in the United States.The agency compiled a computer index of
300,000 names of American people and organizations, and extensive files on
7,200 citizens. It began working secretly with police departments all over
THE USA.

Not exactly. Cointelpro.
Par for the course.