Post by Eric GissePost by Koobee WubleeYou should seriously consider not to worship that nitwit.
The only folks who worship Einstein are morons like you.
How in the world would you construe that I worship Einstein the
nitwit? Is it because your idol Einstein the nitwit is exposed by me
as one such nitwit? Let's see before 1905.
** Length contraction was already proposed by Fitz-Gerald and
Lorentz.
** Constancy in the speed of light was already suggested by Voigt to
explain the null results of Michelson's 1881 experiment which
superseded Michelson's more famous cooperation with Morley six years
later.
** Voigt transform was already identified as a modification to the
Galilean transform that would explain Michelson's the null results of
the 1881 experiment.
** Lorentz transform was already suggested by Larmor after modifying
the Voigt transform to satisfy the principle of relativity.
** Principle of relativity was already suggested by Galileo 300 years
prior.
** Poincare was already established the relative simultaneity
manifested by the mathematics of the Lorentz transform.
Since the Lorentz transform manifests the absurdity of the twin's
paradox, it cannot be considered as a valid piece of physical model,
and yet Professor Roberts sucked the BS all up. In his claim, he is
seeing SR (Lorentz transform) effect in his lab all day long. He is
talking about the observed time dilation. Time dilation alone does
not establish the validity of the Lorentz transform. You must prove
beyond any reason of doubt that the principle of relativity is not
violated. To also prove the principle of relativity, that means the
absurdity of the twin's paradox is a physical law. Well, this is the
trend in physical research. <Sigh>
Continuing with Einstein's contributions in physics in 1916,
** Einstein's professor, Minkowski, who did not have any positive
thing to say about his mentally challenged student, has already weaved
the mathematical construct implied by the Lorentz transform into
something called the spacetime to replace the Aether as already cast
in doubt of its existence by Poincare.
** The Goettingen group of scientists which included Minkowski,
Hilbert, Klein, Schwarzschild have already modeled a curved spacetime
based on Minkowski's model of flat spacetime. These guys just did not
have any clues on how to identify the metric.
** Hilbert had already pulled out a mathematical quantity out of his
*ss which is erroneous identified as a density to the very abstract
quantity called the Einstein-Hilbert action.
** Voila. By taking the partial derivative of this quantity with
respect to each element of the metric, Hilbert cooked up the field
equations. In the meantime, the nitwit Einstein was still struggling
to understand and modify Paul Gerber's work on derivations to
Mercury's orbital advance.
** The first solution to the field equations according to history was
solved by Schwarzschild in his war camp which does not manifest any
black holes.
** Since the field equations yield an infinite number of solutions,
Hilbert was disappointed by Schwarzschild's work. Hilbert had to
present a much simpler solution after Schwarzschild's demise in the
disease-stricken eastern front of WWI. History identified Hilbert's
much simpler solution as the Schwarzschild metric.
Well, I just cannot see what and where the nitwit Einstein's
contributions are. Did somebody whisper the Cosmological constant?
In effect, the Cosmological constant is to add a negative mass density
to the Newtonian law of gravity. Since positive mass gives attractive
gravitational effect, it should not be a surprise that negative mass
gives gravitational repulsion. Poisson beat Einstein to it by at
least 100 years. The Cosmological constant cannot be Einstein's
biggest blunder because there has been nothing coming out of Einstein
the nitwit. <shrug>
Have I explained myself more clearly now that I am no worshipper of
the nitwit Einstein?
PS. Quit doing the cowardly thing learnt from Bilger trying to
forward any replies to alt.morons. It would not work in the long run.
