Claudius Denk
2017-07-12 18:34:15 UTC
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Discussion:
(too old to reply)
p***@gmail.com
2017-07-12 23:38:53 UTC
Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
You don't really know what steam tables are used for, do you, Jim? Clearly, it is not what you think it is.Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
Serg io
2017-07-13 00:35:17 UTC
Post by p***@gmail.com
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
hey Denk/McGinn et al, (I have him plonked)Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
You don't really know what steam tables are used for, do you, Jim? Clearly, it is not what you think it is.Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
what are "steam tables" used for ? they are used with are used with
enthalpy, latent heat, specific entropy, dryness fraction, pressure, wet
steam, lighter than air, density, all things you do not believe in.
benj
2017-07-13 00:43:35 UTC
Post by Serg io
what are "steam tables" used for ? they are used with are used with
enthalpy, latent heat, specific entropy, dryness fraction, pressure, wet
steam, lighter than air, density, all things you do not believe in.
Your problem Sergio is you are using 'wet steam" tables when you need toPost by p***@gmail.com
Clearly, it is not what you think it is.
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it
has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling
point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon
a misunderstanding in your part.
hey Denk/McGinn et al, (I have him plonked)Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of
gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of
H2O?
You don't really know what steam tables are used for, do you, Jim?Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of
gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of
H2O?
Clearly, it is not what you think it is.
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it
has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling
point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon
a misunderstanding in your part.
what are "steam tables" used for ? they are used with are used with
enthalpy, latent heat, specific entropy, dryness fraction, pressure, wet
steam, lighter than air, density, all things you do not believe in.
be using "dry steam" tables.
Serg io
2017-07-13 01:09:55 UTC
Post by benj
be using "dry steam" tables.
sh*t. Oh well, nobody told me, what about 'damp steam', or 'moistPost by Serg io
what are "steam tables" used for ? they are used with are used with
enthalpy, latent heat, specific entropy, dryness fraction, pressure,
wet steam, lighter than air, density, all things you do not believe in.
Your problem Sergio is you are using 'wet steam" tables when you need toPost by p***@gmail.com
Clearly, it is not what you think it is.
it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the
boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is
based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
hey Denk/McGinn et al, (I have him plonked)Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of
gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure
of H2O?
You don't really know what steam tables are used for, do you, Jim?Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of
gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure
of H2O?
Clearly, it is not what you think it is.
it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the
boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is
based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
what are "steam tables" used for ? they are used with are used with
enthalpy, latent heat, specific entropy, dryness fraction, pressure,
wet steam, lighter than air, density, all things you do not believe in.
be using "dry steam" tables.
steam' ?
If my glasses steam up, am I all wet ?
Guess it depends upon which table I'm at.
If I order steamed clams, would they be wet or dry at the table ?
See that steam cleaner on TV, is it spreading enthalpy all over the
place? Or entropy ?
Claudius Denk
2017-07-13 04:46:44 UTC
Post by Serg io
what are "steam tables" used for ? they are used with are used with
enthalpy, latent heat, specific entropy, dryness fraction, pressure, wet
steam, lighter than air, density, all things you do not believe in.
I think we learn more about what people really think from the questions they refuse to answer than we do from those they do answer.Post by p***@gmail.com
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
hey Denk/McGinn et al, (I have him plonked)Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
You don't really know what steam tables are used for, do you, Jim? Clearly, it is not what you think it is.Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
what are "steam tables" used for ? they are used with are used with
enthalpy, latent heat, specific entropy, dryness fraction, pressure, wet
steam, lighter than air, density, all things you do not believe in.
Claudius Denk
2017-07-13 06:09:35 UTC
Post by Serg io
what are "steam tables" used for ? they are used with are used with
enthalpy, latent heat, specific entropy, dryness fraction, pressure, wet
steam, lighter than air, density, all things you do not believe in.
LOL. So, let me get this straight, McGinn told you that he doesn't believe in these? Where?Post by p***@gmail.com
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
hey Denk/McGinn et al, (I have him plonked)Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
You don't really know what steam tables are used for, do you, Jim? Clearly, it is not what you think it is.Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
what are "steam tables" used for ? they are used with are used with
enthalpy, latent heat, specific entropy, dryness fraction, pressure, wet
steam, lighter than air, density, all things you do not believe in.
Provide a reference you dishonest coward.
Claudius Denk
2017-07-13 16:26:21 UTC
Post by Serg io
what are "steam tables" used for ? they are used with are used with
enthalpy, latent heat, specific entropy, dryness fraction, pressure, wet
steam, lighter than air, density, all things you do not believe in.
Gee golly. Trolls are the gift that keeps on giving.Post by p***@gmail.com
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
hey Denk/McGinn et al, (I have him plonked)Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
You don't really know what steam tables are used for, do you, Jim? Clearly, it is not what you think it is.Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
what are "steam tables" used for ? they are used with are used with
enthalpy, latent heat, specific entropy, dryness fraction, pressure, wet
steam, lighter than air, density, all things you do not believe in.
Claudius Denk
2017-07-13 04:46:16 UTC
Post by p***@gmail.com
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
I think we learn more about what people really think from the questions they refuse to answer than we do from those they do answer.Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
You don't really know what steam tables are used for, do you, Jim? Clearly, it is not what you think it is.Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
Claudius Denk
2017-07-13 06:07:18 UTC
Post by p***@gmail.com
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
What do you think it indicates that you won't answer this question?Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
You don't really know what steam tables are used for, do you, Jim? Clearly, it is not what you think it is.Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
CD
James McGinn
2017-07-13 07:13:43 UTC
Post by Claudius Denk
CD
I guess these trolls think that if they don't answer questions they can keep on believing.Post by p***@gmail.com
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
What do you think it indicates that you won't answer this question?Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
You don't really know what steam tables are used for, do you, Jim? Clearly, it is not what you think it is.Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
CD
James McGinn
2017-07-13 07:10:57 UTC
Post by p***@gmail.com
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
You reveal yourself as a fraud for not answering that question.Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
You don't really know what steam tables are used for, do you, Jim? Clearly, it is not what you think it is.Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
You are just a fucking gullible science groupie.
Stay out of science forums, you fucking troll.
Claudius Denk
2017-07-13 15:24:40 UTC
Post by p***@gmail.com
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
Don't look now, but your desperation is showing.Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
You don't really know what steam tables are used for, do you, Jim? Clearly, it is not what you think it is.Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
Claudius Denk
2017-07-13 16:27:30 UTC
Post by p***@gmail.com
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
uh, so, let me get this straight. Steam has nothing to do with, uh, steam?Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
You don't really know what steam tables are used for, do you, Jim? Clearly, it is not what you think it is.Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Go ahead, explain what steam tables are used for, if you can. Hint: it has nothing to do with water in its gaseous state below the boiling point of water, nothing at all... you entire hypothesis is based upon a misunderstanding in your part.
Maybe you should read what you wrote before you hit that send key.
Claudius Denk
2017-07-16 15:27:51 UTC
Post by p***@gmail.com
Answer the question you fucking evasive jackass.Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
You don't really know what steam tables are used for, do you, Jim? Clearly, it is not what you think it is.Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
David (Kronos Prime) Fuller
2017-07-13 02:41:17 UTC
Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
You need to stop eating so many Steamed Foreskins from the Steam tables at the BuffetDo you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Lofty Goat
2017-07-14 19:22:33 UTC
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:34:15 -0700 (PDT), Claudius Denk
Before I can answer that I have to ask you: why are you talking about
cafeteria equipment?
Oh, and boiling point?
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Why even bring it up?
I won't spend a lot of effort sharpening my tongue on your thick hide as
do so many in this newsgroup, but it's worth noting that you make less
and less sense with each passing day.
Why persist?
Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Steam tables?Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Before I can answer that I have to ask you: why are you talking about
cafeteria equipment?
Oh, and boiling point?
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Why even bring it up?
I won't spend a lot of effort sharpening my tongue on your thick hide as
do so many in this newsgroup, but it's worth noting that you make less
and less sense with each passing day.
Why persist?
--
Goat
Goat
Claudius Denk
2017-07-14 19:44:15 UTC
Post by Lofty Goat
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:34:15 -0700 (PDT), Claudius Denk
Before I can answer that I have to ask you: why are you talking about
cafeteria equipment?
Oh, and boiling point?
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Really?On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:34:15 -0700 (PDT), Claudius Denk
Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Steam tables?Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Before I can answer that I have to ask you: why are you talking about
cafeteria equipment?
Oh, and boiling point?
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Can you tell us why, or is that your own special secret?
James McGinn
2017-07-14 20:08:24 UTC
Post by Claudius Denk
Can you tell us why, or is that your own special secret?
Believers will never attempt to explain what they are pretending to understand.Post by Lofty Goat
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:34:15 -0700 (PDT), Claudius Denk
Before I can answer that I have to ask you: why are you talking about
cafeteria equipment?
Oh, and boiling point?
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Really?On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:34:15 -0700 (PDT), Claudius Denk
Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Steam tables?Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Before I can answer that I have to ask you: why are you talking about
cafeteria equipment?
Oh, and boiling point?
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Can you tell us why, or is that your own special secret?
Science groupies may be the most dishonest people in existence.
James McGinn
2017-07-14 20:36:00 UTC
Post by Lofty Goat
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Really? Are you new to science?I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Claudius Denk
2017-07-15 19:31:31 UTC
Post by James McGinn
I knew none of these trolls would answer this question.Post by Lofty Goat
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Really? Are you new to science?I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Trolls never provide details. All they know how to do is whine.
Claudius Denk
2017-07-15 19:33:31 UTC
Post by Lofty Goat
Oh, and boiling point?
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Uh, er.Oh, and boiling point?
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Uh . . . ?
Can you explain the steps that brought you to this conclusion. How is it relevant to the subject at hand. Be specific, you vague nitwit.
The Starmaker
2017-07-15 22:45:59 UTC
Post by Claudius Denk
Uh . . . ?
Can you explain the steps that brought you to this conclusion. How is it relevant to the subject at hand. Be specific, you vague nitwit.
nitwit??? you're geting...testy.Post by Lofty Goat
Oh, and boiling point?
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Uh, er.Oh, and boiling point?
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Uh . . . ?
Can you explain the steps that brought you to this conclusion. How is it relevant to the subject at hand. Be specific, you vague nitwit.
Claudius Denk
2017-07-15 23:40:44 UTC
Post by The Starmaker
You got nothing.Post by Claudius Denk
Uh . . . ?
Can you explain the steps that brought you to this conclusion. How is it relevant to the subject at hand. Be specific, you vague nitwit.
nitwit??? you're geting...testy.Post by Lofty Goat
Oh, and boiling point?
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Uh, er.Oh, and boiling point?
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Uh . . . ?
Can you explain the steps that brought you to this conclusion. How is it relevant to the subject at hand. Be specific, you vague nitwit.
James McGinn
2017-07-16 16:57:28 UTC
Post by The Starmaker
Address the issue in the subject heading, you fucking troll.Post by Claudius Denk
Uh . . . ?
Can you explain the steps that brought you to this conclusion. How is it relevant to the subject at hand. Be specific, you vague nitwit.
nitwit??? you're geting...testy.Post by Lofty Goat
Oh, and boiling point?
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Uh, er.Oh, and boiling point?
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Uh . . . ?
Can you explain the steps that brought you to this conclusion. How is it relevant to the subject at hand. Be specific, you vague nitwit.
Claudius Denk
2017-07-16 18:40:58 UTC
Post by Lofty Goat
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:34:15 -0700 (PDT), Claudius Denk
Before I can answer that I have to ask you: why are you talking about
cafeteria equipment?
Oh, and boiling point?
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Why even bring it up?
I won't spend a lot of effort sharpening my tongue on your thick hide as
do so many in this newsgroup, but it's worth noting that you make less
and less sense with each passing day.
Why persist?
--
Goat
Answer the question, you fucking troll.On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:34:15 -0700 (PDT), Claudius Denk
Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Steam tables?Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Before I can answer that I have to ask you: why are you talking about
cafeteria equipment?
Oh, and boiling point?
I made a point about the term "boiling point" in an earlier post.
Briefly, it is of little or no significance in thermodynamics or
physical chemistry.
Why even bring it up?
I won't spend a lot of effort sharpening my tongue on your thick hide as
do so many in this newsgroup, but it's worth noting that you make less
and less sense with each passing day.
Why persist?
--
Goat
Claudius Denk
2017-07-16 15:26:06 UTC
Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
I knew these phonies wouldn't answer the question. Science is their religion. They see themselves as defenders of truth. Just like religious people.Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
James McGinn
2017-09-24 20:04:09 UTC
Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Odd Bodkin
2017-09-24 20:05:38 UTC
Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous
H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous
H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
James McGinn
2017-09-24 20:35:17 UTC
Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous
H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous
H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Odd Bodkin
2017-09-24 20:58:13 UTC
Post by James McGinn
No
Desperate liar.
I’m not lying.Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous
H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous
H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Serg io
2017-09-25 00:11:00 UTC
Post by Odd Bodkin
James McGinn ... criminal outhouse VandalPost by James McGinn
No
Desperate liar.
I’m not lying.Post by Claudius Denk
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous
H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Do you agree that the steam tables do not show the existence of gaseous
H2O at temperatures below the boiling temperature/pressure of H2O?
Loading Image...
that is the one and only "James McGinn AND Claudious Dink" alright, they
share the same brain space, one is more submissive than the other, the
2 feuding personalities devised some sort of Stalemate to prevent "Fatal
Cognitive Dissonance" The Enemy of your Enemy is your Friend
Multiple Subservient Personalities (MSP)
James is the same dude does those you tube videos holding up hand drawn
mickey mouse heads and driviling incoherently for hours and hours about
"steamed fables".
the one comment he has is by " Jeremy Wang 7 months ago:
"Do not listen to this person unless you want to become stupider."
James McGinn
2017-09-25 01:25:22 UTC
Prove it.
Odd Bodkin
2017-09-25 02:51:05 UTC
Don’t owe that to you.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
James McGinn
2017-09-25 03:12:24 UTC
You got nothing!!!
Odd Bodkin
2017-09-25 12:48:23 UTC
Post by James McGinn
You got nothing!!!
And that little mantra is all you’ve got, Chief Broom.You got nothing!!!
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Claudius Denk
2017-09-25 13:26:50 UTC
Post by Odd Bodkin
Believers only discuss the things they believe in.Post by James McGinn
You got nothing!!!
And that little mantra is all you’ve got, Chief Broom.You got nothing!!!
Odd Bodkin
2017-09-25 17:26:12 UTC
Post by Claudius Denk
Well, it’s true they are not likely to discuss alternatives if thePost by Odd Bodkin
Believers only discuss the things they believe in.Post by James McGinn
You got nothing!!!
And that little mantra is all you’ve got, Chief Broom.You got nothing!!!
alternative is coming from an incompetent nut job who only disbelieves
because he thinks that’s a positive attribute.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Serg io
2017-09-25 18:01:29 UTC
Post by Odd Bodkin
alternative is coming from an incompetent nut job who only disbelieves
because he thinks that’s a positive attribute.
McGinn's Law:Post by Claudius Denk
Well, it’s true they are not likely to discuss alternatives if thePost by Odd Bodkin
Believers only discuss the things they believe in.Post by James McGinn
You got nothing!!!
And that little mantra is all you’ve got, Chief Broom.You got nothing!!!
alternative is coming from an incompetent nut job who only disbelieves
because he thinks that’s a positive attribute.
"Non-Believers only discuss the things they non-believe in."
James McGinn
2017-09-30 06:59:14 UTC
Post by Odd Bodkin
alternative is coming from an incompetent nut job who only disbelieves
because he thinks that’s a positive attribute.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Hmm. Well, if they only consider alternatives from people they agree with that would explain a lot, wouldn't it.Post by Claudius Denk
Well, it’s true they are not likely to discuss alternatives if thePost by Odd Bodkin
Believers only discuss the things they believe in.Post by James McGinn
You got nothing!!!
And that little mantra is all you’ve got, Chief Broom.You got nothing!!!
alternative is coming from an incompetent nut job who only disbelieves
because he thinks that’s a positive attribute.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Belief is a river. Once you get in the flow it is not easy to get out.
Lastly, there is no gaseous H2O at ambient temperatures, you morons.
Odd Bodkin
2017-09-30 20:08:00 UTC
Post by James McGinn
with that would explain a lot, wouldn't it.
Belief is a river. Once you get in the flow it is not easy to get out.
And if the guy calling you out of the river is standing in a pile of shit,Post by Odd Bodkin
alternative is coming from an incompetent nut job who only disbelieves
because he thinks that’s a positive attribute.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Hmm. Well, if they only consider alternatives from people they agreePost by Claudius Denk
Well, it’s true they are not likely to discuss alternatives if thePost by Odd Bodkin
Believers only discuss the things they believe in.Post by James McGinn
You got nothing!!!
And that little mantra is all you’ve got, Chief Broom.You got nothing!!!
alternative is coming from an incompetent nut job who only disbelieves
because he thinks that’s a positive attribute.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
with that would explain a lot, wouldn't it.
Belief is a river. Once you get in the flow it is not easy to get out.
maybe best to float on by.
I know you’d like company in your pile of shit, if only to wrestle in it,
but no thanks.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
James McGinn
2017-10-01 17:43:52 UTC
Post by Odd Bodkin
maybe best to float on by.
I know you’d like company in your pile of shit, if only to wrestle in it,
but no thanks.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
People want to believe what is simple. When simple beliefs are shown to be false people experience cognitive dissonance. That makes them act like children who need their diapers changed.Post by James McGinn
with that would explain a lot, wouldn't it.
Belief is a river. Once you get in the flow it is not easy to get out.
And if the guy calling you out of the river is standing in a pile of shit,Post by Odd Bodkin
alternative is coming from an incompetent nut job who only disbelieves
because he thinks that’s a positive attribute.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Hmm. Well, if they only consider alternatives from people they agreePost by Claudius Denk
Well, it’s true they are not likely to discuss alternatives if thePost by Odd Bodkin
Believers only discuss the things they believe in.Post by James McGinn
You got nothing!!!
And that little mantra is all you’ve got, Chief Broom.You got nothing!!!
alternative is coming from an incompetent nut job who only disbelieves
because he thinks that’s a positive attribute.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
with that would explain a lot, wouldn't it.
Belief is a river. Once you get in the flow it is not easy to get out.
maybe best to float on by.
I know you’d like company in your pile of shit, if only to wrestle in it,
but no thanks.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Odd Bodkin
2017-10-01 20:27:05 UTC
Post by James McGinn
be false people experience cognitive dissonance. That makes them act like
children who need their diapers changed.
This is a clear expression of the pile of shit you’re standing in.Post by Odd Bodkin
maybe best to float on by.
I know you’d like company in your pile of shit, if only to wrestle in it,
but no thanks.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
People want to believe what is simple. When simple beliefs are shown toPost by James McGinn
with that would explain a lot, wouldn't it.
Belief is a river. Once you get in the flow it is not easy to get out.
And if the guy calling you out of the river is standing in a pile of shit,Post by Odd Bodkin
alternative is coming from an incompetent nut job who only disbelieves
because he thinks that’s a positive attribute.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Hmm. Well, if they only consider alternatives from people they agreePost by Claudius Denk
Well, it’s true they are not likely to discuss alternatives if thePost by Odd Bodkin
Believers only discuss the things they believe in.Post by James McGinn
You got nothing!!!
And that little mantra is all you’ve got, Chief Broom.You got nothing!!!
alternative is coming from an incompetent nut job who only disbelieves
because he thinks that’s a positive attribute.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
with that would explain a lot, wouldn't it.
Belief is a river. Once you get in the flow it is not easy to get out.
maybe best to float on by.
I know you’d like company in your pile of shit, if only to wrestle in it,
but no thanks.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
be false people experience cognitive dissonance. That makes them act like
children who need their diapers changed.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
James McGinn
2017-10-02 06:53:24 UTC
You got nothing!!!
Claudius Denk
2018-03-12 21:59:03 UTC
Post by James McGinn
You got nothing!!!
You got nothing!!!