<STALKING_TARGET_43>

[Snit Michael Glasser]

This is what Carroll does: he points to comment ABOUT people (made from
real people or socks), no matter how unsupported, and calls that evedence
even as he ignores what the target of his accusations actually has said.

Meanwhile I just point to what Carroll says:

<rrdeqo$kog$***@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>

And the reply:

<zctCH.2588$***@fx40.iad>

Carroll admits to, at the very least, threats of harassing my employer,
then tries to minimize it by saying multiple posts somehow count as just
"one incident" of his outrageous behavior.

Then Carroll bizarrely insists people should WANT to be harassed by him
because that gives them a chance to prove they are innocent. Utter insanity!

He directly admits to the threats but tries to pretend he did not follow
through, but he gives away his game with this comment:

-----
...here you *still* are, trying to make it appear that *I* should
feel guilty for blowing the whistle
-----
He refers to his harassment as "blowing the whistle" -- but does not speak
of feeling guilty IF he had done so, but speaks about HAVING done so. He
tried to deny it, but then made it clear he harassed my employer.

To add more support to his admission there, he claims to not understand
how harassing people is bad, or how innocent people can be harmed by his
harassment. He admits he cannot see what is wrong with such harassment,
but then pretends he was stopped by some anonymous Jiminy Cricket who made
him rethink how wrong his actions are. Why does he contradict himself so
much?

In short: He proves much of what I have been saying about him right there.
His words. No need to dig back.

After he screwed up, and as predicted, "new" people showed up. While he
currently is denying he uses such socks, in the past he has admitted to
it:

<d278fe60-ce88-403d-95a2-***@googlegroups.com>
-----
I faked those Mac accounts, (i.e Toasty) because you
deserved it
-----

Yeah, he does bad things because his victims deserve it. That is his worldview...
he needs his anonymous Jiminy Cricket to stop him. He cannot stop himself.

[STALKING_TARGET_01]

Post by Snit Michael Glasser
This is what Carroll does: he points to comment ABOUT people (made from
real people or socks), no matter how unsupported, and calls that evedence
even as he ignores what the target of his accusations actually has said.
Carroll admits to, at the very least, threats of harassing my employer,
then tries to minimize it by saying multiple posts somehow count as just
"one incident" of his outrageous behavior.
Then Carroll bizarrely insists people should WANT to be harassed by him
because that gives them a chance to prove they are innocent. Utter insanity!
He directly admits to the threats but tries to pretend he did not follow
-----
...here you *still* are, trying to make it appear that *I* should
feel guilty for blowing the whistle
-----
He refers to his harassment as "blowing the whistle" -- but does not speak
of feeling guilty IF he had done so, but speaks about HAVING done so. He
tried to deny it, but then made it clear he harassed my employer.
To add more support to his admission there, he claims to not understand
how harassing people is bad, or how innocent people can be harmed by his
harassment. He admits he cannot see what is wrong with such harassment,
but then pretends he was stopped by some anonymous Jiminy Cricket who made
him rethink how wrong his actions are. Why does he contradict himself so
much?
In short: He proves much of what I have been saying about him right there.
His words. No need to dig back.
After he screwed up, and as predicted, "new" people showed up. While he
currently is denying he uses such socks, in the past he has admitted to
-----
I faked those Mac accounts, (i.e Toasty) because you
deserved it
-----
Yeah, he does bad things because his victims deserve it. That is his worldview...
he needs his anonymous Jiminy Cricket to stop him. He cannot stop himself.
--
Do not click this link!
https://forums.cabling-design.com/wireless/wifi-out-to-800-feet-329594-
.htm
https://www.bing.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis+the+narcissistic+bigot
https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot

Keep in mind your accusation is based on you not understanding context. Your
game:

* Snit spoke of Dustin Cook having Carroll's flood bot code .
* Dustin Cook does not have Carroll's flood bot code.

Then you insist I lied. But you leave out the context.

1) Snit spoke of Carroll's flood bot code, and what can be known without
the code
2) Dustin Cook responded by speaking of what he can know HAVING THE CODE.
3) Snit spoke of Dustin Cook having Carroll's flood bot code.
4) Dustin Cook does not have Carroll's flood bot code.

You start at step three and then insist that if one starts there it LOOKS
like you were unfairly accused.

In short: you prove yourself a functionally illiterate fraud again.

--
E-commerce Simplified!
https://gibiru.com/results.html?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
Dustin Cook: Functional Illiterate Fraud

[Gremlin the Functionally Illiterate Fraud]

Post by Snit Michael Glasser
This is what Carroll does: he points to comment ABOUT people (made from
real people or socks), no matter how unsupported, and calls that evedence
even as he ignores what the target of his accusations actually has said.
Carroll admits to, at the very least, threats of harassing my employer,
then tries to minimize it by saying multiple posts somehow count as just
"one incident" of his outrageous behavior.
Then Carroll bizarrely insists people should WANT to be harassed by him
because that gives them a chance to prove they are innocent. Utter insanity!
He directly admits to the threats but tries to pretend he did not follow
-----
...here you *still* are, trying to make it appear that *I* should
feel guilty for blowing the whistle
-----
He refers to his harassment as "blowing the whistle" -- but does not speak
of feeling guilty IF he had done so, but speaks about HAVING done so. He
tried to deny it, but then made it clear he harassed my employer.
To add more support to his admission there, he claims to not understand
how harassing people is bad, or how innocent people can be harmed by his
harassment. He admits he cannot see what is wrong with such harassment,
but then pretends he was stopped by some anonymous Jiminy Cricket who made
him rethink how wrong his actions are. Why does he contradict himself so
much?
In short: He proves much of what I have been saying about him right there.
His words. No need to dig back.
After he screwed up, and as predicted, "new" people showed up. While he
currently is denying he uses such socks, in the past he has admitted to
-----
I faked those Mac accounts, (i.e Toasty) because you
deserved it
-----
Yeah, he does bad things because his victims deserve it. That is his worldview...
he needs his anonymous Jiminy Cricket to stop him. He cannot stop himself.
--
Do not click this link!
https://forums.cabling-design.com/wireless/wifi-out-to-800-feet-329594-
.htm
https://www.bing.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis+the+narcissistic+bigot
https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot

David asked to be rated according to direct statistical evidence, which Snit
obliged him with. But when the stats were run, it turns out beyond any doubt,
David was far more "dishonest" than Snit.

Just look at the effort Snit once again had to spend to get David able to
pull messages from a usenet server via reverse engineering. Snit once again,
took abuse from David, instead of a great thanks, much appreciated, response
- that I believe Snit was owed for the trouble and time he spent on the matter.

He would have to be afflicted with a form of insanity to be unsure of whether
or not he "never had" worked with a website. When a guy can't remember his
past claims and exercises fake, self-esteem protecting garbage later, it's
very clear what his error is.

Anyone familiar with our history knows the flood bot is not generated in
the manner Snit is claiming, and most of them are clearly manually written.

[STALKING_TARGET_40]

Post by Snit Michael Glasser
This is what Carroll does: he points to comment ABOUT people (made from
real people or socks), no matter how unsupported, and calls that evedence
even as he ignores what the target of his accusations actually has said.
Carroll admits to, at the very least, threats of harassing my employer,
then tries to minimize it by saying multiple posts somehow count as just
"one incident" of his outrageous behavior.
Then Carroll bizarrely insists people should WANT to be harassed by him
because that gives them a chance to prove they are innocent. Utter insanity!
He directly admits to the threats but tries to pretend he did not follow
-----
...here you *still* are, trying to make it appear that *I* should
feel guilty for blowing the whistle
-----
He refers to his harassment as "blowing the whistle" -- but does not speak
of feeling guilty IF he had done so, but speaks about HAVING done so. He
tried to deny it, but then made it clear he harassed my employer.
To add more support to his admission there, he claims to not understand
how harassing people is bad, or how innocent people can be harmed by his
harassment. He admits he cannot see what is wrong with such harassment,
but then pretends he was stopped by some anonymous Jiminy Cricket who made
him rethink how wrong his actions are. Why does he contradict himself so
much?
In short: He proves much of what I have been saying about him right there.
His words. No need to dig back.
After he screwed up, and as predicted, "new" people showed up. While he
currently is denying he uses such socks, in the past he has admitted to
-----
I faked those Mac accounts, (i.e Toasty) because you
deserved it
-----
Yeah, he does bad things because his victims deserve it. That is his worldview...
he needs his anonymous Jiminy Cricket to stop him. He cannot stop himself.
--
Do not click this link!
https://forums.cabling-design.com/wireless/wifi-out-to-800-feet-329594-
.htm
https://www.bing.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis+the+narcissistic+bigot
https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot

I'm well aware the junk I link to from Reddit is merely novice level. That
said, it serves its purpose.

The cult-like herd of convenient friends value conformity in all things.
I still persist in being uncertain that these flooding posts are unequivocally
automated.

When will Shadow support the assetion they've made many times recently
about me being a Commander Kinsey sock?

Shadow: <rqebpk$f4d$***@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
-----

Post by Snit Michael Glasser
An "entire bot"? Meaning you are saying it is part of one?

That's all any of the code demos I've shown Commander Kinsey
are, for years now.
-----

But then Shadow flip flops:

Shadow: <rqk10g$j1c$***@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
-----
So... these are "parts" the size of "code snippets", written in
AS, in this thread, not "the past"
(drop your bizarre narratives and dry out)."
-----

Shadow starts with "for years now" but then denies that is in the past.
And Shadow insists the code from the past was not tied to bots... directly
contradicting themselves.

It was Shadow who forged me (and others) and did not even try to hide
it. "Somewhere between 1996 or 2001 I trusted Commander Kinsey, the absolutely
laughable liar" - Shadow.


--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened!!
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Steve%20Petruzzellis%20narcissistic%20bigot
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22FUNCTIONAL+ILLITERATE+FRAUD%22
https://www.bing.com/search?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot

[Steve Carroll - frelwizen]

Post by STALKING_TARGET_40

Post by Snit Michael Glasser
This is what Carroll does: he points to comment ABOUT people (made from
real people or socks), no matter how unsupported, and calls that evedence
even as he ignores what the target of his accusations actually has said.
Carroll admits to, at the very least, threats of harassing my employer,
then tries to minimize it by saying multiple posts somehow count as just
"one incident" of his outrageous behavior.
Then Carroll bizarrely insists people should WANT to be harassed by him
because that gives them a chance to prove they are innocent. Utter insanity!
He directly admits to the threats but tries to pretend he did not follow
-----
...here you *still* are, trying to make it appear that *I* should
feel guilty for blowing the whistle
-----
He refers to his harassment as "blowing the whistle" -- but does not speak
of feeling guilty IF he had done so, but speaks about HAVING done so. He
tried to deny it, but then made it clear he harassed my employer.
To add more support to his admission there, he claims to not understand
how harassing people is bad, or how innocent people can be harmed by his
harassment. He admits he cannot see what is wrong with such harassment,
but then pretends he was stopped by some anonymous Jiminy Cricket who made
him rethink how wrong his actions are. Why does he contradict himself so
much?
In short: He proves much of what I have been saying about him right there.
His words. No need to dig back.
After he screwed up, and as predicted, "new" people showed up. While he
currently is denying he uses such socks, in the past he has admitted to
-----
I faked those Mac accounts, (i.e Toasty) because you
deserved it
-----
Yeah, he does bad things because his victims deserve it. That is his worldview...
he needs his anonymous Jiminy Cricket to stop him. He cannot stop himself.
--
Do not click this link!
https://forums.cabling-design.com/wireless/wifi-out-to-800-feet-329594-
.htm
https://www.bing.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis+the+narcissistic+bigot
https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot

I'm well aware the junk I link to from Reddit is merely novice level. That
said, it serves its purpose.
The cult-like herd of convenient friends value conformity in all things.
I still persist in being uncertain that these flooding posts are unequivocally
automated.
When will Shadow support the assetion they've made many times recently
about me being a Commander Kinsey sock?
-----

Post by Snit Michael Glasser
An "entire bot"? Meaning you are saying it is part of one?

That's all any of the code demos I've shown Commander Kinsey
are, for years now.
-----
-----
So... these are "parts" the size of "code snippets", written in
AS, in this thread, not "the past"
(drop your bizarre narratives and dry out)."
-----
Shadow starts with "for years now" but then denies that is in the past.
And Shadow insists the code from the past was not tied to bots... directly
contradicting themselves.
It was Shadow who forged me (and others) and did not even try to hide
it. "Somewhere between 1996 or 2001 I trusted Commander Kinsey, the absolutely
laughable liar" - Shadow.
--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened!!
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Steve%20Petruzzellis%20narcissistic%20bigot
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22FUNCTIONAL+ILLITERATE+FRAUD%22
https://www.bing.com/search?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot

https://secure.tennesseetrustee.org/index.php?main=Y

Select Sullivan County
Select Pay/Search Property Taxes
Enter 108 Warrior Drive
On second line click View

Why does Dustin Cook's family owe $4,742.45 in property taxes on a home
worth only $115,500

Rodney Wood has been a bad boy it seems!

-
Top 15 Ways Peter Köhlmann Trolls!
https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
https://www.bing.com/search?q=Dustin%20Cook%20functional%20illiterate%20fraud
https://prescott-arizona.janbarham.org.au/yavapai-college-library-202.html/
Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud