Post by Mitchell HolmanAnd that negligence is failing to
sweep the forest floors as Trump has
ordered, right?
Real clean up is unprofitable hence republicans don't want to pay
for it. They have collect the litter, oxidise it safely, and
return the fixed nitrogen to the soil. They have to leave strong
healthy trees as strong healthy trees instead of cutting them
down to sell at a profit.
The problem is global warming as well as Reagan. Before Reagan
timber companies were long term organisations that did
sustainable selective cuts. Reagan let loose the dogs of junk
bonds. Those were used to buy timber companies. The only way to
pay off the junk bonds was massive clear cuts. Once the timber
companies cut down all their own trees, they have demanded
republicans let them clear cut national forests.
Their justification has evolved into fire management: clear cut
everything and they alsp remove litter, bush, and all that fixed
nitrogen. Deserts can't burn, right?
How long will it take to clean up after iDJT? We're still
cleaning up after Reagan. Part the 2008 crash was companies not
keeping liquid assets after Reagan junk bonds made that
impractical.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The first law of discordiamism: The more energy This post / \
to make order is nore energy made into entropy. insults Islam. Mohammed