Discussion:
Trump: New York Times Is 'Fake News' -- LOL -- New York Times Has To Apologize For Fake News! - Looks Like He Was Right, After All
(too old to reply)
AlleyCat
2017-04-22 02:10:19 UTC
Permalink
Trump: New York Times Is 'Fake News' -- LOL -- New York Times Has To
Apologize For Fake News!

Looks like he was right, after all.

*****

The New York Times Admits Wrongdoing

Trump: New York Times Is 'Fake News' -- LOL -- New York Times Has To
Apologize For Fake News! - Looks Like He Was Right, After All

'I'm An Idiot': New York Times Editor Admits Tweeting Dueling Patriots
Photos Was A Blunder

New York Times Editor Issues 'Greatest Apology Ever' After Fake News Story

New York Times Apologizes for Fake News:


https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1
&q=New+York+Times+Apologizes+for+Fake+News+
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Siri Cruise
2017-04-22 03:50:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
Trump: New York Times Is 'Fake News' -- LOL -- New York Times Has To
Apologize For Fake News!
You're so desperate. Sad.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
AlleyCat
2017-04-22 05:43:24 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:50:34 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by AlleyCat
Trump: New York Times Is 'Fake News' -- LOL -- New York Times Has To
Apologize For Fake News!
You're so desperate. Sad.
And you pansy-ass leftist wingers were so wrong.

Pathetic.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
PIBB
2017-04-22 08:41:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
Trump: New York Times Is 'Fake News' -- LOL -- New York
Times Has To Apologize For Fake News!
Looks like he was right, after all.
*****
The New York Times Admits Wrongdoing
Trump: New York Times Is 'Fake News' -- LOL -- New York
Times Has To Apologize For Fake News! - Looks Like He Was
Right, After All
'I'm An Idiot': New York Times Editor Admits Tweeting Dueling
Patriots Photos Was A Blunder
New York Times Editor Issues 'Greatest Apology Ever' After Fake News Story
http://youtu.be/mjzUcQLYpow
https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1
&q=New+York+Times+Apologizes+for+Fake+News+
Unfortunately for you, there's no proof at those links about your
fake claims.

They're just a sham used by you to spread fake allegations.
NoBody
2017-04-22 14:46:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by PIBB
Post by AlleyCat
Trump: New York Times Is 'Fake News' -- LOL -- New York
Times Has To Apologize For Fake News!
Looks like he was right, after all.
*****
The New York Times Admits Wrongdoing
Trump: New York Times Is 'Fake News' -- LOL -- New York
Times Has To Apologize For Fake News! - Looks Like He Was
Right, After All
'I'm An Idiot': New York Times Editor Admits Tweeting Dueling
Patriots Photos Was A Blunder
New York Times Editor Issues 'Greatest Apology Ever' After Fake News Story
http://youtu.be/mjzUcQLYpow
https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1
&q=New+York+Times+Apologizes+for+Fake+News+
Unfortunately for you, there's no proof at those links about your
fake claims.
They're just a sham used by you to spread fake allegations.
Sigh...

http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/the-wrap/article/NY-Times-Editor-Apologizes-to-Trump-Over-11089083.php
Rudy Canoza
2017-04-22 16:05:43 UTC
Permalink
On 4/22/2017 7:46 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody
[snip lies]
No "fake news" - this is settled.

Here's something that *is* fake: Trumpolini continually referring to
the paper as the "failing" New York Times. It is not failing.
Subscribers and revenue are rising.
NoBody
2017-04-23 14:26:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
On 4/22/2017 7:46 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody
[snip lies]
No "fake news" - this is settled.
Fake News = NYT, correct.
Rudy Canoza
2017-04-23 17:01:28 UTC
Permalink
On 4/23/2017 7:26 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Rudy Canoza
On 4/22/2017 7:46 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody
[snip lies]
No "fake news" - this is settled.
Fake News
Almost exclusively in right-wingnut sites like Breitbart, InfoWars, CNS,
WND, etc.
AlleyCat
2017-04-23 23:41:59 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 10:01:28 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
Post by Rudy Canoza
On 4/23/2017 7:26 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Rudy Canoza
On 4/22/2017 7:46 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody
[snip lies]
No "fake news" - this is settled.
Fake News
Almost exclusively in right-wingnut sites like Breitbart, InfoWars, CNS,
WND, etc.
CITE the fake news. For every (1) I will post 10 from CNN and other
sources.

No cite, must be a lie.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Rudy Canoza
2017-04-23 23:56:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 10:01:28 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
Post by Rudy Canoza
On 4/23/2017 7:26 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Rudy Canoza
On 4/22/2017 7:46 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody
[snip lies]
No "fake news" - this is settled.
Fake News
Almost exclusively in right-wingnut sites like Breitbart, InfoWars, CNS,
WND, etc.
CITE the fake news.
I already have done.
Post by AlleyCat
For every (1) I will post 10 from CNN and other
sources.
Bullshit. CNN, NYT, WSJ, WaPo - they have *never* published fake news.
I've explained the difference to you many times, you impotent little
cunt whom I would squash like a bug if I ever saw you. The legitimate
news sources - the ones I mentioned above - make errors, but they issue
corrections. They *never* publish anything they know to be false. By
contrast, that is *ALL* that Breitbart (which you fucking HIV+ wingnuts
invariably misspell "Brietbart"), CNS, WND and most especially InfoWars
have fake news at the *VERY CORE* of their business model. Virtually
every word they publish is false, and they *know* it to be false when
they run it. They know that illiterate squat-to-piss fuckstains like
you *want* to believe it. You're stupid, and you're stupid by choice.

I can kick your ass. You know this to be true.
AlleyCat
2017-04-24 00:39:53 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 16:56:27 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
Post by Rudy Canoza
whom I would squash like a bug if I ever saw you.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Bring your nerdy ass down here to Florida. What makes YOU so tough, dork?
Are you one of those dweebs who took Karate and Kung Fool, and now thinks
he can beat anyone up?

LOL... I've been a fighter all my life. I had two older brothers... do the
math. My wife and son took that Kung Fool shit, and they BOTH couldn't
defend themselves against me. You can't letter in 3 sports and be someone
who can't either fight or take care of themselves, so bring your dorky ass
on down here, and test yourself against me.

Have YOU been a bouncer? I have, and WE squashed you low-self-esteemed
nerds like bugs, when we wouldn't let you in with your fake IDs.

[snicker]

I told you before, nerd... come to Florida. If not... quit playing
keyboard kowboy and threatening me. You KNOW you're just a big-mouthed
nerd who HAS to express himself on Usenet, because NO ONE will go to your
basement and listen to you.

[chuckle]

Put up, or shut up.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Rudy Canoza
2017-04-24 00:49:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 16:56:27 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
Post by Rudy Canoza
whom I would squash like a bug if I ever saw you.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Bring your nerdy ass down here to Florida. What makes YOU so tough, dork?
You wouldn't know until it's too late.
Post by AlleyCat
LOL... I've been a fighter all my life.
LOL! No.
M.I.Wakefield
2017-04-24 01:47:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by AlleyCat
LOL... I've been a fighter all my life.
LOL! No.
But he is: His record against Reality is 0-147.
NoBody
2017-04-24 10:48:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 16:56:27 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
Post by Rudy Canoza
whom I would squash like a bug if I ever saw you.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Bring your nerdy ass down here to Florida. What makes YOU so tough, dork?
Are you one of those dweebs who took Karate and Kung Fool, and now thinks
he can beat anyone up?
LOL... I've been a fighter all my life. I had two older brothers... do the
math. My wife and son took that Kung Fool shit, and they BOTH couldn't
defend themselves against me. You can't letter in 3 sports and be someone
who can't either fight or take care of themselves, so bring your dorky ass
on down here, and test yourself against me.
Have YOU been a bouncer? I have, and WE squashed you low-self-esteemed
nerds like bugs, when we wouldn't let you in with your fake IDs.
[snicker]
I told you before, nerd... come to Florida. If not... quit playing
keyboard kowboy and threatening me. You KNOW you're just a big-mouthed
nerd who HAS to express himself on Usenet, because NO ONE will go to your
basement and listen to you.
[chuckle]
Put up, or shut up.
Rudy doesn't know how to put up anything. He evades and then
threatens you if you dont' agree with him.
Rudy Canoza
2017-04-24 14:50:25 UTC
Permalink
On 4/24/2017 3:48 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody
Post by NoBody
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 16:56:27 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
Post by Rudy Canoza
whom I would squash like a bug if I ever saw you.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Bring your nerdy ass down here to Florida. What makes YOU so tough, dork?
Are you one of those dweebs who took Karate and Kung Fool, and now thinks
he can beat anyone up?
LOL... I've been a fighter all my life. I had two older brothers... do the
math. My wife and son took that Kung Fool shit, and they BOTH couldn't
defend themselves against me. You can't letter in 3 sports and be someone
who can't either fight or take care of themselves, so bring your dorky ass
on down here, and test yourself against me.
Have YOU been a bouncer? I have, and WE squashed you low-self-esteemed
nerds like bugs, when we wouldn't let you in with your fake IDs.
[snicker]
I told you before, nerd... come to Florida. If not... quit playing
keyboard kowboy and threatening me. You KNOW you're just a big-mouthed
nerd who HAS to express himself on Usenet, because NO ONE will go to your
basement and listen to you.
[chuckle]
Put up, or shut up.
Rudy doesn't know how to put up anything.
That's a lie, of course. I put up the stuff that proves you to be a
fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody blackshirt, registered sex
offender and sodomite, every time.
NoBody
2017-04-25 11:27:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
On 4/24/2017 3:48 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody
Post by NoBody
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 16:56:27 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
Post by Rudy Canoza
whom I would squash like a bug if I ever saw you.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Bring your nerdy ass down here to Florida. What makes YOU so tough, dork?
Are you one of those dweebs who took Karate and Kung Fool, and now thinks
he can beat anyone up?
LOL... I've been a fighter all my life. I had two older brothers... do the
math. My wife and son took that Kung Fool shit, and they BOTH couldn't
defend themselves against me. You can't letter in 3 sports and be someone
who can't either fight or take care of themselves, so bring your dorky ass
on down here, and test yourself against me.
Have YOU been a bouncer? I have, and WE squashed you low-self-esteemed
nerds like bugs, when we wouldn't let you in with your fake IDs.
[snicker]
I told you before, nerd... come to Florida. If not... quit playing
keyboard kowboy and threatening me. You KNOW you're just a big-mouthed
nerd who HAS to express himself on Usenet, because NO ONE will go to your
basement and listen to you.
[chuckle]
Put up, or shut up.
Rudy doesn't know how to put up anything.
That's a lie, of course. I put up the stuff that proves you to be a
fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody blackshirt, registered sex
offender and sodomite, every time.
Then put up your proof that I reported you to your Usenet provider as
you claimed. Let's go, lying coward....
Rudy Canoza
2017-04-25 15:42:22 UTC
Permalink
On 4/25/2017 4:27 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody
Post by NoBody
Post by Rudy Canoza
On 4/24/2017 3:48 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody
Post by NoBody
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 16:56:27 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
Post by Rudy Canoza
whom I would squash like a bug if I ever saw you.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Stale, just like all of the shit-4-braincell's stale and trite bullshit.
Post by NoBody
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by NoBody
Post by AlleyCat
Bring your nerdy ass down here to Florida. What makes YOU so tough, dork?
Are you one of those dweebs who took Karate and Kung Fool, and now thinks
he can beat anyone up?
LOL... I've been a fighter all my life. I had two older brothers... do the
math. My wife and son took that Kung Fool shit, and they BOTH couldn't
defend themselves against me. You can't letter in 3 sports and be someone
who can't either fight or take care of themselves, so bring your dorky ass
on down here, and test yourself against me.
Have YOU been a bouncer? I have, and WE squashed you low-self-esteemed
nerds like bugs, when we wouldn't let you in with your fake IDs.
[snicker]
I told you before, nerd... come to Florida. If not... quit playing
keyboard kowboy and threatening me. You KNOW you're just a big-mouthed
nerd who HAS to express himself on Usenet, because NO ONE will go to your
basement and listen to you.
[chuckle]
Put up, or shut up.
Rudy doesn't know how to put up anything.
That's a lie, of course. I put up the stuff that proves you to be a
fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody blackshirt, registered sex
offender and sodomite, every time.
Then put up your proof
done.
PIBB
2017-04-24 12:54:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 16:56:27 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
Post by Rudy Canoza
whom I would squash like a bug if I ever saw you.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Bring your nerdy ass down here to Florida. What makes YOU so
tough, dork? Are you one of those dweebs who took Karate and
Kung Fool, and now thinks he can beat anyone up?
LOL... I've been a fighter all my life.
Yeah. So tough you killed someone while you were still in the womb.
Here we go.
Post by AlleyCat
I had two older
brothers... do the math. My wife and son took that Kung Fool
shit, and they BOTH couldn't defend themselves against me. You
can't letter in 3 sports and be someone who can't either fight
or take care of themselves, so bring your dorky ass on down
here, and test yourself against me.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Can't beat you. Bruce Willis, Bruce Lee,
Terminator, Rambo all learn from you.
Post by AlleyCat
Have YOU been a bouncer? I have, and WE squashed you
low-self-esteemed nerds like bugs, when we wouldn't let you in
with your fake IDs.
Sure. Yeah. World's toughest fighter. Trained in special ops.
Mission last week - can't talk. I know.
Post by AlleyCat
I told you before, nerd... come to Florida. If not... quit
playing keyboard kowboy and threatening me. You KNOW you're just
a big-mouthed nerd who HAS to express himself on Usenet, because
NO ONE will go to your basement and listen to you.
I believe you. Really I do.
Siri Cruise
2017-04-24 15:58:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by PIBB
Yeah. So tough you killed someone while you were still in the womb.
Here we go.
Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.
Post by PIBB
Post by AlleyCat
I had two older
I have an uncle with two sons and a daughter. My cousins never beat each other
to a pulp. It must be a middle class thing.
Post by PIBB
Post by AlleyCat
brothers... do the math. My wife and son took that Kung Fool
shit, and they BOTH couldn't defend themselves against me. You
Great. So you admit to spousal and child abuse. How much gaol time did you do?
Post by PIBB
Sure. Yeah. World's toughest fighter. Trained in special ops.
Mission last week - can't talk. I know.
Is he actually Gunner?
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
PIBB
2017-04-24 21:27:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by PIBB
Yeah. So tough you killed someone while you were still in the
womb. Here we go.
Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.
Post by PIBB
Post by AlleyCat
I had two older
I have an uncle with two sons and a daughter. My cousins never
beat each other to a pulp. It must be a middle class thing.
Post by PIBB
Post by AlleyCat
brothers... do the math. My wife and son took that Kung Fool
shit, and they BOTH couldn't defend themselves against me.
You
Great. So you admit to spousal and child abuse. How much gaol
time did you do?
Post by PIBB
Sure. Yeah. World's toughest fighter. Trained in special
ops. Mission last week - can't talk. I know.
Is he actually Gunner?
Dunno. I haven't read enough of Gunner to really know but I haven't
seen any outbursts from him like that.

It sounds like someone who's flipped and wants to intimidate others.
AlleyCat
2017-04-24 22:43:20 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 22:27:34 +0100, PIBB says...
Post by PIBB
It sounds like someone who's flipped and wants to intimidate others.
LOL... I didn't "flip out", and *I'M* not trying to intimidate anyone.

There's a difference between me defending myself, and someone trying to
intimidate ME with threats of violence. I never do that (unless I'M
threatened), but at the same time, I'm not going to let anyone do it to
me. I don't put up with that shit, and I WILL "fight" back. Defense
against intimidation, is NOT intimidation itself.

Telling someone to come down here and TRY to "squash me like a bug", is
not trying to intimidate... it's giving someone who has tried to
intimidate ME, the opportunity to follow through on their hollow threats.

Rudy's "last resort" when losing an argument, was to threaten me. THAT'S
the difference in someone comfortable in the knowledge of what I CAN do,
and those who haven't a fucking clue, and have NEVER been in a physical
fight... I don't HAVE to intimidate someone with threats of violence.

You nerds have such low-self-esteem, you HAVE to show false bravado to get
"respect". I respect you all (as humans), until you say something stupid,
like Rudy did... then, it's gloves off.

Unlike you pussies on the left, who only THINK they can intimidate someone
by saying, "... whom I would squash like a bug if I ever saw you", I don't
EVER try to intimidate anyone with threats of violence if I'm losing an
argument. If my words aren't enough to win the argument, I will quietly
slink away, and I will NOT threaten anyone because I'm losing.

Contrary to what you nerds here think, not everyone who uses Usenet IS a
nerd, so Rudy's hollow threats weren't aimed at someone who will just say
something clever, (more like stupid), and just let it go. I take threats
seriously (it's my nature), even though I know the little nerd won't do
anything.

Those who try to wave off what I say as false bravado or outright lies
(like that girl Siri), would shit their collective pants if they EVER came
here and tried to "squash ME like a bug." I never lie about myself. Why
would I? I don't feel the need to impress you lonely basement dwelling
mommy's boys. I've lived a life you nerds could only DREAM of living. Why
is that so hard for you to believe... because I read Usenet? LOL

I DID have two older brothers... I HAD to learn how to fight as a child.
Those who say "violence is the last refuge of the incompetent", are
usually those who CAN'T fight, WON'T fight, and couldn't fight their ways
out of a wet paper bag, but ALWAYS resort to using "fighting language" to
make a point.

Rudy, may he rest in peace in my bozo Bin, said he wanted to, "squash (me)
like a bug". Did I say that *I* would do anything to him, before, or even
after HE threatened ME?

No... I simply gave him a chance to follow through on HIS flip-out. What
did HE do? He shut the hell up and didn't threaten me anymore. THAT'S what
you do to someone who can't back up their threats. Just tell them to DO
what they say they "want" to do, but won't and can't.

Shuts them up every time. ;-)
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Rudy Canoza
2017-04-24 23:03:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 22:27:34 +0100, PIBB says...
Post by PIBB
It sounds like someone who's flipped and wants to intimidate others.
LOL... I didn't "flip out", and *I'M* not trying to intimidate anyone.
Both are true.
Post by AlleyCat
There's a difference between me defending myself, and someone trying to
intimidate ME with threats of violence. I blah blah blah bullshit
You're just a fuckwit, that's all.
Siri Cruise
2017-04-25 00:13:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 22:27:34 +0100, PIBB says...
Post by PIBB
It sounds like someone who's flipped and wants to intimidate others.
LOL... I didn't "flip out", and *I'M* not trying to intimidate anyone.
There's a difference between me defending myself, and someone trying to
intimidate ME with threats of violence. I never do that (unless I'M
threatened), but at the same time, I'm not going to let anyone do it to
me. I don't put up with that shit, and I WILL "fight" back. Defense
against intimidation, is NOT intimidation itself.
Telling someone to come down here and TRY to "squash me like a bug", is
not trying to intimidate... it's giving someone who has tried to
intimidate ME, the opportunity to follow through on their hollow threats.
On the other hand Gunner has to keep his blood pressure down so his heart
doesn't explode.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
PIBB
2017-04-25 07:16:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 22:27:34 +0100, PIBB says...
Post by PIBB
It sounds like someone who's flipped and wants to intimidate
others.
LOL... I didn't "flip out", and *I'M* not trying to intimidate
anyone.
There's a difference between me defending myself, and someone
trying to intimidate ME with threats of violence. I never do
that (unless I'M threatened), but at the same time, I'm not
going to let anyone do it to me. I don't put up with that shit,
and I WILL "fight" back. Defense against intimidation, is NOT
intimidation itself.
Telling someone to come down here and TRY to "squash me like a
bug", is not trying to intimidate... it's giving someone who has
tried to intimidate ME, the opportunity to follow through on
their hollow threats.
Rudy's "last resort" when losing an argument, was to threaten
me. THAT'S the difference in someone comfortable in the
knowledge of what I CAN do, and those who haven't a fucking
clue, and have NEVER been in a physical fight... I don't HAVE to
intimidate someone with threats of violence.
You nerds have such low-self-esteem, you HAVE to show false
bravado to get "respect". I respect you all (as humans), until
you say something stupid, like Rudy did... then, it's gloves
off.
Unlike you pussies on the left, who only THINK they can
intimidate someone by saying, "... whom I would squash like a
bug if I ever saw you", I don't EVER try to intimidate anyone
with threats of violence if I'm losing an argument. If my words
aren't enough to win the argument, I will quietly slink away,
and I will NOT threaten anyone because I'm losing.
Contrary to what you nerds here think, not everyone who uses
Usenet IS a nerd, so Rudy's hollow threats weren't aimed at
someone who will just say something clever, (more like stupid),
and just let it go. I take threats seriously (it's my nature),
even though I know the little nerd won't do anything.
Those who try to wave off what I say as false bravado or
outright lies (like that girl Siri), would shit their collective
pants if they EVER came here and tried to "squash ME like a
bug." I never lie about myself. Why would I? I don't feel the
need to impress you lonely basement dwelling mommy's boys. I've
lived a life you nerds could only DREAM of living. Why is that
so hard for you to believe... because I read Usenet? LOL
I DID have two older brothers... I HAD to learn how to fight as
a child. Those who say "violence is the last refuge of the
incompetent", are usually those who CAN'T fight, WON'T fight,
and couldn't fight their ways out of a wet paper bag, but ALWAYS
resort to using "fighting language" to make a point.
Rudy, may he rest in peace in my bozo Bin, said he wanted to,
"squash (me) like a bug". Did I say that *I* would do anything
to him, before, or even after HE threatened ME?
No... I simply gave him a chance to follow through on HIS
flip-out. What did HE do? He shut the hell up and didn't
threaten me anymore. THAT'S what you do to someone who can't
back up their threats. Just tell them to DO what they say they
"want" to do, but won't and can't.
Shuts them up every time. ;-)
Wow AlleyCat. Did I touch a nerve? I didn't realize when I
encountered you that I had come across the toughest guy ever.

Let's imagine for one moment that all your dreamy fantasises are
true and you're the toughest guy I have ever met. So what? It
doesn't change the fact that you post like a loon. A semi-
psychotic loon with ideas so bizarre and so nonsensical that I
regularly turn away from your posts in complete embarassment.

Maybe one day you will get incarcerated for some wild activity and
then your claimed toughness can rub along happily with other
criminal neanderthals where you can brag about your toughness.
Meanwhile out of jail here in the normal world, you're a wacko.

Please don't reply to tell me of your latest street fight or how
many people you knifed last weekend or shot up with your
formidable arsenal of assault rifles or how many special ops
mission you went on in Iraq and Afghansitan or how you were the
stunt man for James Bond or .... zzzzz. Wake me up when you have
finished.
AlleyCat
2017-04-25 01:16:48 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:14:26 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth says...
We should have common understanding of what it is.
Ammmm... there can BE no "common" understanding, because fake news to a
Democrat, is something Fox News broadcasts, and to a Republican, it's what
CNN does all day, and The New York Times does occasionally.

One "man's" fake news, is another man's Holy Bible of truth. ;-)

See what I'm gettin' at? Case in point, is the Russian idea, that what the
Times reported was fake, but who can tell... it's the RUSSIANS fer chrise
sake! (see below)
NO ONE has any proof that Trump "colluded" with Russia on ANYTHING
other than business dealings (like the 1000s of AMERICAN businesses
that do),
but that hasn't stopped them from "reporting", ad nauseum I might add,
what someone, some time, merely SUGGESTED.
Please provide a specific story (with a link) from the Times that meets
your definition of "fake news".
MY definition doesn't matter... what matters are the definitions of "fake
news" given by the people it affects. If *I* say that this is fake news,
it really doesn't matter. In THIS case, the New England Patriots were the
ones calling it fake news, and The New York Times agreed, because they
actually apologized for it. Do you live UNDER the ground that the rock
sits on?

Though it was a tweet and not in the paper, a tweet these days holds more
clout and is seen by more people than who actually read the times.

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2017/apr/20/new-york-
times/new-york-times-tweet-fumbles-comparisons-patriots-/

*****

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/22/world/europe/russia-fake-news-media-
foreign-ministry-.html?_r=0

*****

To me, fake news can be the Times running a headline that completely
misses the mark, trying to misdirect the reader to think something other
than what the article REALLY says.

Case in point: "Amid 'Trump Effect' Fear, 40% of Colleges See dip In
Foreign Applicants"

MOST people will think that because the headline was prefaced with "Amid
'Trump Effect' Fear", that there is a 40% dip in fearful APPLICANTS, which
is not true. 35% of COLLEGES saw an INCREASE in foreign applicants, but
did they mention THAT? Nope.

If you look at the survey the Times article is based on, this is what you
find:

39% of responding institutions reported a decline in international
applications, 35% reported an increase, and 26% reported no change in
applicant numbers.

That's right: the Times headline equally well could have read, "Thanks to
President Trump, 35% of Colleges See Increase in Foreign Applicants."

The Times long ago gave up on being a respectable newspaper. It is now,
purely and simply, an organ of the Democratic Party.

*****

If it is that YOU don't think the Times publishes fake news, then that's
YOUR opinion... but what about when the Times publishes fake news then
retracts it, KNOWING it's fake?

NY Times Publishes, Then Retracts, Fake News

On February 28, the New York Times magazine published a long, dark essay
by left-winger Emily Bazelon on the prospects for President Trump's
Department of Justice-or, as the Times headline put it, "Department of
Justification." The article, which focuses on Jeff Sessions, Steve Bannon
and Stephen Miller, isn't worth reading. It exemplifies the far-left
hysteria with which we are all too familiar.

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/03/ny-times-publishes-then-
retracts-fake-news.php

So it must have been embarrassing when, this morning, the Times had to
admit that Bazelon's article included an important piece of fake news.
This is today's correction:

An article on March 5 about the Department of Justice included outdated
statistics. It is not the case that non-Muslim extremists have killed
nearly twice as many Americans as radical Muslims since Sept. 11, 2001,
according to the New America Foundation. That was true until the mass
shootings in San Bernardino, Calif., and Orlando, Fla. Radical Muslims
have now killed nearly twice as many Americans as non-Muslim extremists.

The original statistic was silly on several grounds. It started on the day
after the September 11 Islamic terror attacks killed 3,000 Americans,
which is absurd. And it depended on how a liberal group classified
violence as "extremist" as opposed to merely criminal. But Bazelon's
citation of this old liberal chestnut was sadly out of date, and her
statement was unquestionably false.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Josh Rosenbluth
2017-04-25 02:04:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:14:26 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth says...
We should have common understanding of what it is.
Ammmm... there can BE no "common" understanding, because fake news to a
Democrat, is something Fox News broadcasts, and to a Republican, it's what
CNN does all day, and The New York Times does occasionally.
One "man's" fake news, is another man's Holy Bible of truth. ;-)
If that's the case, then fake news only advances a partisan agenda and
the whole notion should be ignored and discarded.
Post by AlleyCat
See what I'm gettin' at? Case in point, is the Russian idea, that what the
Times reported was fake, but who can tell... it's the RUSSIANS fer chrise
sake! (see below)
NO ONE has any proof that Trump "colluded" with Russia on ANYTHING
other than business dealings (like the 1000s of AMERICAN businesses
that do),
but that hasn't stopped them from "reporting", ad nauseum I might add,
what someone, some time, merely SUGGESTED.
Please provide a specific story (with a link) from the Times that meets
your definition of "fake news".
MY definition doesn't matter... what matters are the definitions of "fake
news" given by the people it affects. If *I* say that this is fake news,
it really doesn't matter. In THIS case, the New England Patriots were the
ones calling it fake news, and The New York Times agreed, because they
actually apologized for it. Do you live UNDER the ground that the rock
sits on?
Though it was a tweet and not in the paper, a tweet these days holds more
clout and is seen by more people than who actually read the times.
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2017/apr/20/new-york-
times/new-york-times-tweet-fumbles-comparisons-patriots-/
*****
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/22/world/europe/russia-fake-news-media-
foreign-ministry-.html?_r=0
*****
To me, fake news can be the Times running a headline that completely
misses the mark, trying to misdirect the reader to think something other
than what the article REALLY says.
Case in point: "Amid 'Trump Effect' Fear, 40% of Colleges See dip In
Foreign Applicants"
MOST people will think that because the headline was prefaced with "Amid
'Trump Effect' Fear", that there is a 40% dip in fearful APPLICANTS, which
is not true. 35% of COLLEGES saw an INCREASE in foreign applicants, but
did they mention THAT? Nope.
If you look at the survey the Times article is based on, this is what you
39% of responding institutions reported a decline in international
applications, 35% reported an increase, and 26% reported no change in
applicant numbers.
That's right: the Times headline equally well could have read, "Thanks to
President Trump, 35% of Colleges See Increase in Foreign Applicants."
The Times long ago gave up on being a respectable newspaper. It is now,
purely and simply, an organ of the Democratic Party.
*****
If it is that YOU don't think the Times publishes fake news, then that's
YOUR opinion... but what about when the Times publishes fake news then
retracts it, KNOWING it's fake?
NY Times Publishes, Then Retracts, Fake News
On February 28, the New York Times magazine published a long, dark essay
by left-winger Emily Bazelon on the prospects for President Trump's
Department of Justice-or, as the Times headline put it, "Department of
Justification." The article, which focuses on Jeff Sessions, Steve Bannon
and Stephen Miller, isn't worth reading. It exemplifies the far-left
hysteria with which we are all too familiar.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/03/ny-times-publishes-then-
retracts-fake-news.php
So it must have been embarrassing when, this morning, the Times had to
admit that Bazelon's article included an important piece of fake news.
An article on March 5 about the Department of Justice included outdated
statistics. It is not the case that non-Muslim extremists have killed
nearly twice as many Americans as radical Muslims since Sept. 11, 2001,
according to the New America Foundation. That was true until the mass
shootings in San Bernardino, Calif., and Orlando, Fla. Radical Muslims
have now killed nearly twice as many Americans as non-Muslim extremists.
The original statistic was silly on several grounds. It started on the day
after the September 11 Islamic terror attacks killed 3,000 Americans,
which is absurd. And it depended on how a liberal group classified
violence as "extremist" as opposed to merely criminal. But Bazelon's
citation of this old liberal chestnut was sadly out of date, and her
statement was unquestionably false.
AlleyCat
2017-04-25 02:22:53 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:04:04 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth says...
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by AlleyCat
One "man's" fake news, is another man's Holy Bible of truth. ;-)
If that's the case, then fake news only advances a partisan agenda and
the whole notion should be ignored and discarded.
Ammmm... no. Partisan "agendas" have been part of the American landscape
for over 200 years. You don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.

We'll get through this fake news bullshit, when the babies of American
media finally ADMIT that they're being childish, because they didn't get
what they wanted... a woman President.

Pick someone else... ANYONE else. Hillary was worse than Trump has ever
been and will ever be. The TRUTH of her was sickening.

Too bad, so sad.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Rudy Canoza
2017-04-25 02:45:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:04:04 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth says...
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by AlleyCat
One "man's" fake news, is another man's Holy Bible of truth. ;-)
If that's the case, then fake news only advances a partisan agenda and
the whole notion should be ignored and discarded.
Ammmm... no.
*Right*. Here is what fake news is:

- something *known* to be false at the time of publication or broadcast
- the *intent* of knowingly publishing something false is to mislead
people in pursuit of a political objective
- knowingly publishing false material in order to mislead is an
*intrinsic* part of the entity's business model

Your sites are fake news. The New York Times, AP, Washington Post, NBC,
CBS - not fake news.

This is settled.
Rudy Canoza
2017-04-25 02:43:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:14:26 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth says...
We should have common understanding of what it is.
Ammmm... there can BE no "common" understanding, because
Bullshit. I've told you what it is. Here it is again. Pay attention,
cocksucker - don't make me come down to Florida.

This is *the* definition of fake news. Pay attention, shitwipe:

- something *known* to be false at the time of publication or broadcast
- the *intent* of knowingly publishing something false is to mislead
people in pursuit of a political objective
- knowingly publishing false material in order to mislead is an
*intrinsic* part of the entity's business model

That is fake news. That's the definition - period.

*Your* sites are all fake news - every one of them. The New York Times
does not do fake news.
David Johnston
2017-04-25 20:06:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:14:26 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth says...
We should have common understanding of what it is.
Ammmm... there can BE no "common" understanding, because fake news to a
Democrat, is something Fox News broadcasts,
No it isn't. Fake news is not Fox News. Fox News is actual news
organization with real reporters. That it has a certain slant handed
down from the head office doesn't make it fake news.
M.I.Wakefield
2017-04-25 20:34:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
Post by AlleyCat
Ammmm... there can BE no "common" understanding, because fake news to a
Democrat, is something Fox News broadcasts,
No it isn't. Fake news is not Fox News. Fox News is actual news
organization with real reporters.
And some of those reporters, Shep Smith in particular, could get a job
anywhere in cable news. OTOH, I wouldn't believe anything Sean Hannity said
without three independent witnesses, and Tucker Carlson is down to his last
shot, having been run out of MSNBC and CNN.
Post by David Johnston
That it has a certain slant handed down from the head office doesn't make
it fake news.
The stories that do, and don't get covered, can be telling.
Gronk
2017-05-01 03:50:45 UTC
Permalink
AlleyCat wrote:
<https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q="fox+news"+apologizes&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8>

919K hits


And the chief source of fake news

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims/

hroughout President Trump’s first 100 days, the Fact Checker team tracked
false and misleading claims made by the president since Jan. 20.

As of Trump’s 100th day, we counted 488 false or misleading claims.
Gronk
2017-05-06 05:51:23 UTC
Permalink
AlleyCat wrote:
<https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q="fox+news"+apologizes&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8>

919K hits


And the chief source of fake news

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims/

hroughout President Trump’s first 100 days, the Fact Checker team tracked
false and misleading claims made by the president since Jan. 20.

As of Trump’s 100th day, we counted 488 false or misleading claims.
Gronk
2017-05-21 05:39:09 UTC
Permalink
AlleyCat wrote:
<https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q="fox+news"+apologizes&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8>

919K hits


And the chief source of fake news

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims/

hroughout President Trump’s first 100 days, the Fact Checker team tracked
false and misleading claims made by the president since Jan. 20.

As of Trump’s 100th day, we counted 488 false or misleading claims.
andy memory
2017-05-21 15:24:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
919K hits
And the chief source of fake news
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/19/trump-press-coverage-sets-new-standard-for-negativity-study.html

Trump press coverage 'sets new standard' for negativity: Study

A Harvard study found that 80 percent of Trump coverage was
negative during his first 100 days in office.

President Donald Trump's early days in office were subjected to almost
universally negative news coverage, a Harvard study has found.

The Trump presidency is "setting a new standard for unfavorable press
coverage of a president," according to the report from Thomas E.
Patterson, professor of government and the press at the Harvard Kennedy
School and Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy.

The study looked at Trump's first 100 days and examined coverage in the
print editions of The New York Times, Wall Street Journal and The
Washington Post, as well as broadcast outlets CNN, CBS, Fox News and
CNBC parent NBC, and European news outlets the Financial Times, BBC and
ARD in Germany.

Of the total news stories examined, 41 percent focused on Trump, which
was triple the coverage for previous presidents for the same period

And of that group, the tone was resoundingly negative — 80 percent of
all stories, to be exact. That would be just shy of double the first 100
days of Barack Obama and significantly more than George H.W. Bush and
Bill Clinton.

Trump frequently has criticized his coverage, stating this week that "no
politician in history" has been treated worse.
M.I.Wakefield
2017-05-21 17:15:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by andy memory
Trump press coverage 'sets new standard' for negativity: Study
You try and spin firing the FBI Director, leaking Israeli intelligence to
the Russians, being forced to fire the National Security Adviser, having a
Special Counsel named, a baseless claim that Obama had wiretapped him, and a
deeply unpopular healthcare bill, into good news for Trump.
andy memory
2017-05-21 17:33:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by andy memory
Trump press coverage 'sets new standard' for negativity: Study
You try and spin firing the FBI Director,
"spin"?

The guy was beset by endless scandals:

https://news.grabien.com/story-10-major-fbi-scandals-comeys-watch

Here are 10 of Comey's biggest embarrassments at the FBI:

1. After Dylann Roof killed nine South Carolina parishioners in cold
blood, James Comey admitted that an error in their background check
system allowed Roof to legally buy his gun. "We are all sick this
happened," Comey said of the massive screw-up.

2. Shortly after the NSA scandal exploded in 2013, the FBI was exposed
conducting its own data mining on innocent Americans; the agency,
Bloomberg reported, retains that material for decades (even if no
wrongdoing is found). This is particularly ironic since Comey largely
launched his political career by aligning himself with Sen. Schumer
during the Bush Administration, making himself known as an opponent of a
controversial surveillance program.

3. From 2013-2014, the FBI authorized informants to break the law more
than 11,000 times, a steep increase from the years prior; these
allowances, which the FBI calls "otherwise illegal activity," is part of
a controversial program that has been accused of resulting in the
accidental death of many informants (amongst other unanticipated
consequences).

4. Comey made an embarrassing gaffe during a speech at the Holocaust
Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. in 2015, when he suggested Poland
was an "accomplice" to Nazi Germany during the Holocaust. The comments
angered America's allies in Poland, whose foreign ministry summoned the
U.S. ambassador for reprimanding. The ambassador, Stephen Mull, later
apologized on Comey's behalf.

5. When the FBI demanded Apple create a "backdoor" that would allow law
enforcement agencies to unlock the cell phones of various suspects, the
company refused, sparking a battle between the feds and America's
biggest tech company. What makes this incident indicative of Comey's
questionable management of the agency is that a) The FBI jumped the gun,
as they were indeed ultimately able to crack the San Bernardino
terrorist's phone, and b) Almost every other major national security
figure sided with Apple (from former CIA Director General Petraeus to
former CIA Director James Woolsey to former director of the NSA, General
Michael Hayden), warning that such a "crack" would inevitably wind up in
the wrong hands.

6. In 2015, the FBI conducted a controversial raid on a Texas political
meeting, finger printing, photographing, and seizing phones from
attendees (some in the group believe in restoring Texas as an
independent constitutional republic).

7. During its investigation into Hillary Clinton's mishandling of
classified material, the FBI made an unusual deal in which Clinton aides
were both given immunity and allowed to destroy their laptops.

8. Before Comey's tenure, the FBI came under attack for not taking
seriously enough the threat from terror suspects they interviewed. The
FBI interviewed Tamerlan Tsarnaev but let him go; Russia sent the Obama
Administration a second warning, but the FBI opted against investigating
him again. Earlier, the FBI had possession of emails sent by Nidal Hasan
saying he wanted to kill his fellow soldiers to protect the Taliban --
but didn't intervene, leading many critics to argue the tragedy that
resulted in the death of 31 Americans at Fort Hood could have been
prevented. After Comey took over, the sae unfortunate trend continued.
The father of the radical Islamist who detonated a backpack bomb in New
York City in 2016 alerted the FBI to his son's radicalization. The FBI,
however, cleared Ahmad Khan Rahami after a brief interview.

9. The FBI also investigated the terrorist who killed 49 people and
wounded 53 more at the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando, Fla. Despite a more
than 10-month investigation of Omar Mateen -- during which Mateen
admitting lying to agents -- the FBI opted against pressing further and
closed its case.

10. CBS recently reported that when two terrorists sought to kill
Americans attending the "Draw Muhammad" event in Garland, Texas, the FBI
not only had an understanding an attack was coming, but actually had an
undercover agent traveling with the Islamists, Elton Simpson and Nadir
Soofi. The FBI has refused to comment on why the agent on the scene did
not intervene during the attack.


And it IS the President's dutiful choice to hire and fire as he sees
fit, sorry that discomfits you.
Post by M.I.Wakefield
leaking Israeli intelligence
to the Russians,
No evidence of that at all.

Please note - Bibi isn't up in arms, now is he?
Post by M.I.Wakefield
being forced to fire the National Security Adviser,
To bad he wasn't more candid when he was interviewed - oh well...
Post by M.I.Wakefield
having a Special Counsel named,
By a slavering lynch mob of deep state Swampers.
Post by M.I.Wakefield
a baseless claim that Obama had
wiretapped him,
Prove it's "baseless".

Justic Scalia thought Obummer had the SCOTUS wiretapped too.

http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/napolitano-scalia-thought-he-was-being-surveilled/

The late U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia suspected
the Obama administration was spying on him, said Judge Andrew
Napolitano, a Fox News senior judicial analyst.

“Justice Scalia told me that he often thought the court was being
surveilled. And he told me that probably four or five years ago,”
Napolitano told the FOX Business Network on Monday.

Scalia died in his sleep in February 2016 while on a hunting trip at a
luxury Texas resort. He was declared dead of natural causes amid
speculation of foul play.

(with a pillow over his face)
Post by M.I.Wakefield
and a deeply unpopular healthcare bill,
You mean the ACA, the same 1,200 pages of unread legalese that is
bankrupting our health insurers?

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-19/no-obamacare-most-iowa-tennessee-what-happens-fallback-plans

Nearly the entire state of Tennessee has a single Obamacare provider. In
sixteen counties, none of this year’s providers want to do business.

Mississippi, Alabama, South Carolina, Oklahoma, Alaska, and Wyoming are
states where there is only a single provider for the entire state. Iowa
is likely to be covered by a single provider next year. Most of North
Carolina, Florida, Missouri, and Arizona are also in a single-provider
situation.

Enrollment for 2018 starts in November. Will the problem be fixed by then?
Post by M.I.Wakefield
into good news for Trump.
A few observations about you:

1. You're not smart at all.

2. You're absurdly biased.

3. You're painfully ill-informed.

4. You have a hand-me-down leftard agenda.

5. You can't even hope to beat me on actual facts and talking points.


...so really all you are is my latest chew toy...

enjoy!
Gronk
2017-06-03 05:32:46 UTC
Permalink
AlleyCat wrote:
<https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q="fox+news"+apologizes&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8>

919K hits


And the chief source of fake news

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims/

hroughout President Trump’s first 100 days, the Fact Checker team tracked
false and misleading claims made by the president since Jan. 20.

As of Trump’s 100th day, we counted 488 false or misleading claims.
tyre biter
2017-06-03 14:30:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
And the chief source of fake news
Is you, Cambridge Ma. whore!
Gronk
2017-09-20 03:46:57 UTC
Permalink
AlleyCat wrote:
<https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q="fox+news"+apologizes&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8>

919K hits


And the chief source of fake news

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims/

hroughout President Trump’s first 100 days, the Fact Checker team tracked
false and misleading claims made by the president since Jan. 20.

As of Trump’s 100th day, we counted 488 false or misleading claims.
D.R. Strange
2017-09-20 04:06:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
As of Trump’s 100th day, we counted 488 false or misleading claims.
Cry us a salty river of spite, you Cambridge Ma. leftarded whore!
Gronk
2017-11-05 03:06:22 UTC
Permalink
AlleyCat wrote:
<https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q="fox+news"+apologizes&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8>

919K hits


And the chief source of fake news

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims/

hroughout President Trump’s first 100 days, the Fact Checker team tracked
false and misleading claims made by the president since Jan. 20.

As of Trump’s 100th day, we counted 488 false or misleading claims.
Ik@r
2017-11-05 16:47:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
And the chief source of fake news
Believe it NOW!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/sci_tech/2000/climate_change/1023334.stm


Not our fault

Are we, the fossil-fuel-burning public, partially responsible for this
recent warming trend? Almost assuredly not.

These small global temperature increases of the last 25 years and over
the last century are likely natural changes that the globe has seen many
times in the past.


Human kind has little or nothing to do with the recent temperature changes

William M. Gray
Colorado State University
This small warming is likely a result of the natural alterations in
global ocean currents which are driven by ocean salinity variations.
Ocean circulation variations are as yet little understood.

Human kind has little or nothing to do with the recent temperature
changes. We are not that influential.

There is a negative or complementary nature to human-induced greenhouse
gas increases in comparison with the dominant natural greenhouse gas of
water vapour and its cloud derivatives.

It has been assumed by the human-induced global warming advocates that
as anthropogenic greenhouse gases increase that water vapour and
upper-level cloudiness will also rise and lead to accelerated warming -
a positive feedback loop.

It is not the human-induced greenhouse gases themselves which cause
significant warming but the assumed extra water vapour and cloudiness
that some scientists hypothesise.

Negative feedback

The global general circulation models which simulate significant amounts
of human-induced warming are incorrectly structured to give this
positive feedback loop.

Their internal model assumptions are thus not realistic.

Mainstream opinion believes that pollution contributes to climate change
As human-induced greenhouse gases rise, global-averaged upper-level
atmospheric water vapour and thin cirrus should be expected to decrease
not increase.

Water vapour and cirrus cloudiness should be thought of as a negative
rather than a positive feedback to human-induced - or anthropogenic
greenhouse gas increases.

No significant human-induced greenhouse gas warming can occur with such
a negative feedback loop.
Gronk
2017-12-04 05:24:34 UTC
Permalink
AlleyCat wrote:
<https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q="fox+news"+apologizes&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8>

919K hits


And the chief source of fake news

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims/

hroughout President Trump’s first 100 days, the Fact Checker team tracked
false and misleading claims made by the president since Jan. 20.

As of Trump’s 100th day, we counted 488 false or misleading claims.
Libs R Pervs
2017-12-04 15:30:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
As of Trump’s 100th day, we counted
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/454028/donald-trump-accomplishments-thanksgiving


And the best is yet to come. This Thanksgiving, Americans in general —
and free-market conservatives in particular — have plenty for which to
be grateful. And much of it would be absent had the White House’s
current occupant not become president on November 8, 2016. The day after
Donald J. Trump defeated Hillary Clinton, Princeton University economist
Paul Krugman called Trump’s victory “the mother of all adverse effects.”
He predicted “very probably . . . a global recession, with no end in
sight.” • The Dow Jones Industrial Average, NASDAQ, and S&P 500 all hit
record highs on Tuesday. The Wilshire 5000 Index calculates that some
$3.4 trillion in new wealth has been created since President Trump’s
inauguration and $5.4 trillion since his election. Fueled by the reality
of deregulation, expectations of lower taxes, and a new tone in
Washington that applauds free enterprise rather than excoriate it, the
economy is on fire. • Atop the second quarter’s 3.1 percent increase in
real GDP, and 3.0 in 3Q, the New York Federal Reserve Bank predicts that
4Q output will expand by 3.8 percent. This far outpaces the feeble
average-annual GDP growth rate of 1.5 percent on President Obama’s
watch. Meanwhile, the IMF expects global GDP to rise by 3.5 percent this
year. So much for a Trump-inspired “global recession.” • Unemployment is
at 4.1 percent, a 17-year low. New unemployment claims in September were
at their most modest since 1974. Goldman Sachs on November 20 “lowered
our unemployment rate forecast to 3.7 percent by end-2018 and 3.5
percent by end-2019.” According to the Wall Street powerhouse’s chief
economist Jan Hatzius, “Such a scenario would take the U.S. labor market
into territory almost never seen outside of a major wartime
mobilization.” • American companies have been expanding operations here
rather than shipping jobs overseas. Corning, for instance, announced a
$500 million investment in new U.S. production, launching 1,000
positions. • Foreign firms have been unveiling facilities and creating
jobs in America. Insourcing is now a thing. Taiwan’s Foxconn will spend
$10 billion on a new Wisconsin electronics plant with 3,000 new
employees. During Trump’s recent visit to China, Beijing agreed to
invest $84 billion in new energy projects in West Virginia. • If the
Senate cooperates, Santa Claus will deliver $1.5 trillion in tax cuts,
including a dream-come-true 43 percent reduction in corporate taxes,
from a 35 percent rate to 20 percent, well below the global average of
22.5 percent. This major blow for international competitiveness should
turbocharge the economy even further. • Obamacare remains alive, alas,
largely due to the flaccid leadership of Senate Majority Leader Mitch
McConnell’s (R., Ky.) and his inability to control a handful of
Republican prima donnas. (As of November 2, the House had passed 394
bills; 308 of them — 78 percent — are moldering in McConnell’s inbox.)
However, the GOP may make Obamacare voluntary. Junking the individual
mandate will emancipate Americans from this unprecedented attack on our
freedom and, as an added bonus, make $318 billion available for deeper
tax cuts. • U.S. energy production is on the upswing. After languishing
under Obama, the Keystone XL and Dakota Access Pipelines are under
construction. Jobs to be created: 42,000. • Obama’s War on Coal is gone
with the wind. • Trump wisely extricated America from the bogus Paris
“global-warming” deal. • Obama’s “Clean Power Plan,” a $993 billion act
of economic self-sabotage, now rots — with Communism — atop the ash heap
of history. • For every new regulation that Trump has imposed, 16 have
been erased. • The FCC has begun to dismantle Obama’s “Net Neutrality”
takeover of the Internet, which functioned marvelously, thank you,
before his needless e-power-grab. • Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch
is on the bench, along with 13 constitutionalist lower-court judges. At
this stage in Obama’s presidency, the Senate had confirmed just seven of
his district- and circuit-court nominees. • President Trump signed
legislation to ease the firing of incompetent and corrupt officials in
the Department of Veterans Affairs. So far, according to the White
House, the VA has sacked more than 500 such undesirables, suspended 200,
and demoted 33. Trump also has endorsed bills that give embattled vets
greater choice in health care beyond the largely ruinous, highly toxic,
single-payer VA medical system. • Trump has revitalized ties with
America’s NATO allies, who finally have begun to pay their fair share
for collective security — as their heretofore disregarded commitments
require. • The president of the United States movingly and eloquently
defended Western Civilization in a stirring speech in Warsaw, arguably
his best in office. • Trump urged Arab and Muslim leaders to “drive out”
militant Islam in a milestone address in Riyadh. • To that end,
U.S.-assisted forces have driven ISIS from an expansive caliphate with
many square miles of land to a horrid idea with a shrinking grasp on a
few sand dunes, soon to be pried from their filthy fingers. • With Trump
aboard, Air Force One flew the first direct flight ever between Saudi
Arabia and Israel. • Trump stood steadfastly by Israel at the Western
Wall and with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Obama’s cold-shoulder
policy toward Israel is finished. • Asian heads of state were impressed
with Trump last week. Soon after he left China, the Chinese government
agreed to Trump’s request and released three UCLA basketball players who
were arrested for shoplifting and destined, most likely, to long prison
sentences. • Just after Trump returned to America, China sent a
delegation to talk some sense into North Korean madman Kim Jong-un. •
Pyongyang is as strongly sanctioned as it has been in ages, in part
thanks to the U.N. Security Council’s U.S.-led unanimous votes to that
effect. • The State Department this week returned North Korea to the
official list of State Sponsors of Terrorism. George W. Bush excused
North Korea from that deadly distinction, to little positive effect. •
The disastrous Iran nuclear deal soon may be shredded — as it should be.
For now, Trump has declared Iran no longer in compliance with the
agreement, flimsy as it is. • Guantanamo Bay remains open for business,
and Obama’s “catch and release” policy toward its militant-Islamic
detainees ist kaput. • Under this president, illegal-alien border
crossings are down 41 percent on the southern frontier, versus January
through October 2016, under Obama. • ICE has arrested 97,482 illegal
aliens under President Trump, as of October 27, up 43 percent
year-on-year. Of these 52,169 (53.5 percent) have been expelled — up 30
percent. Among those arrested, the White House reports, 70 percent were
convicted criminals. • Rather than ridicule vote fraud, as Democrats
routinely do, President Trump appointed a commission to investigate
shenanigans at the polls and how America’s entire system of casting
ballots can be made tamper-proof. Vice President Mike Pence chairs this
panel. Secretary of State Kris Kobach (R., Kan.) co-chairs. • The
Education Department’s due-process-crushing Title IX “guidance letter”
on sexual harassment on college campuses is null and void. • The Trump
administration is giving green lights to school-choice efforts across
America. • The Justice Department is investigating Harvard University
for possibly violating the civil rights of Americans of Asian descent
who argue that they are being rejected in favor of less qualified
applicants of other ethnicities. Ideas that center-Right activists have
demanded for decades are becoming public policy, one after another. •
Obama’s execrable war on the Little Sisters on the Poor, who literally
work for $0.00 per year, mercifully has ended. These powerless women no
longer must lose sleep because a nearly omnipotent guy in Washington
ordered them to provide contraceptives through their health-care plan,
their religious convictions be damned. Anyone covered by that order of
Catholic nuns, who wants birth control, can go out and buy such products
with her own money. • Obama’s federal transgender-bathroom patrol has
been disbanded. State and local school officials now will decide whether
or not to abide by the centuries-old, commonsense rule that humans with
male anatomy use men’s rooms and those with female anatomy use women’s
rooms. • President Trump’s re-embrace of the so-called Mexico City
Policy once again bars federal funding of abortions overseas. And much
more. The Never Trump faction still claims that the president of the
United States “is no conservative.” And yet, with rare deviations (such
as free trade), he spends nearly every day implementing the conservative
agenda. Ideas that center-Right activists have demanded for decades are
becoming public policy, one after another — to the pleasant surprise of
even some of Donald J. Trump’s most enthusiastic supporters. Ten months
down. Thirty-eight to go. The best is yet to come. Thank you, Mr.
President! — Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News Contributor and
a contributing editor with National Review Online.

Read more at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/454028/donald-trump-accomplishments-thanksgiving
Loading...