Post by Jolly RogerIt might make sense for fools, but not for the rest of us.
<https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/portland/news/press-releases/tech-tuesdaysmart-tvs/?=portland-field-office>
I refuse to use smart televisions because they have a horrible track
record for being abysmally insecure. It’s very clear security is an
afterthought at best for smart TV makers. If I did have to buy a smart
TV, I would be sure not to connect it to the internet - or even to my
home WiFi network. I'll always prefer to have a standard television with
an Apple TV connected to it. Apple has a proven track record with regard
to protecting your security and privacy.
I also avoid having any internet-enabled smart devices in my home, in
preference to devices that do not require connection to the internet for
normal operation for the same reason. The network cameras in my home,
for instance, do not need an Internet connection for me to use them.
+10.
Watch out for those black helicopters too.
My smart TV has neither a microphone nor a camera. Of course it's about
the least expensive UHD TV on the market. It has three ports─two HDMI
ports and one TOSLINK port. If it did have a camera I would cover it.
And of course a Roku or Apple TV box also connects to the Internet. You
can set up a firewall to be safe and most routers have this capability.
I set my TVs and DVD players up with wired Ethernet but that's for
reliability and speed, not because of any fear of someone spying.
I guess if Kellyanne Conway got people to believe that Obama was spying
on them through their microwave ovens then anything is possible
<https://www.wired.com/2017/03/kellyanne-conway-microwave-spying/>/
In any case, I don't believe that it's even possible to buy a non-smart
new TV anymore so it's moot. Don't believe that just because you don't
hook up wired or wireless networking to your TV that it's not capable of
spying on you.
The only issue with Apple TV+ at this juncture is that there are only a
few programs available but that's not unexpected because it's so new.
It's not quite fair to judge it as a paid service because almost no one
is actually paying for it yet, but that hasn't stopped media outlets
from panning it, i.e.
<https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/columnist/2019/11/29/facebook-apple-5-g-smart-tvs-top-tech-turkey-2019/4303720002/>.
AppleTV+ will likely have 100 million subscribers in 2020 though not
paid subscribers.
They are getting signups because they're throwing it in free for a
year with purchases of new Apple products. By the time that year is up
they should have a lot more content and then it may be worth the $4.99
per month. But as I said before, what they could do to really upend
things is to offer a combination Apple Music, Apple Magazines, Apple TV+
combination subscription at a compelling price point, say $10-12 per
month for an individual subscription, and $20-24 per month for a family
subscription.