From our history

[#BeamMeUpScotty]

Granting gays civil rights is "extreme"?
Does that also apply to civil rights for women and
blacks and religious minorities?

Unlike homosexuals, women and blacks have immunability factors.
The CRA of 1964 has not been amended to include homosexuals,
transsexuals or those with gender dysphoria.

People with "identity" problems seem to be mentally ill and apparently
to fall under the ADA Americans with Disabilities Act.

Which means that diagnosing themselves and voting for laws for
themselves would be like letting the inmates run the asylum.

Much like letting the illegal aliens vote themselves citizenship.

Religious minorities have a proven history of persecution, while
others without immunability factors just have their claims...
claims based on how they "feel"....today.
Regardless of one's "feelings", people should not be disrespected
and free to do what they want in the privacy of their own home.

NOT when public health is considered, or are they violating my rights
and my kids rights when the government tries to force us to become a
petri dish for their vaccine experiments and when the ban us from
feeding the homeless from our personal kitchens? They can't have it both
ways, if they want privacy at home then we all get it, when we are at
home doing things that effect others.

That said, society should not be required to accept the "feelings"
of others in the public sphere they would usually reject in private.

Forcing me to believe in gays that are NOT proven to be anything more
than mentally ill heterosexuals is the same as forcing a religion on me.

Or forcing me "to accept the gays" as part of their mental illness
treatment and the government has no power to force me to engage in the
treatment of mental illness for anyone. In fact some places have banned
anyone from treating the mental illness associated with gays sexual
identity. Which would then be banning me from accepting gay marriage as
a way to cure their mental illness. In those places you're damned if
you do and damned if you don't. The laws contradict one another.
Liberal/Democrats can't seem to make up their minds.

[e***@yahoo.com]

Gays have not been listed as “mentally ill” since the 70s. You might want to join us here in the 21st Century.

[KWills Shill #3]

Gays have not been listed as “mentally ill” since the 70s. You might
want to join us here in the 21st Century.

I've requested the "Scotty" cite where in the DSM V one can find
homosexuality listed as a mental illness. I don't expect he'll offer
the requested cite.

[e***@yahoo.com]

Don’t be silly. He “knows.” Those who “know,” Don’t have to be concerned with facts or evidence!

[KWills Shill #3]

Don’t be silly. He “knows.” Those who “know,” Don’t have to be
concerned with facts or evidence!

Of course, you are correct. Scotty will probably refuse to even
acknowledge that I made the request.

[KWills Shill #3]

On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:12:12 -0400, #BeamMeUpScotty

Post by #BeamMeUpScotty

Granting gays civil rights is "extreme"?
Does that also apply to civil rights for women and
blacks and religious minorities?

Unlike homosexuals, women and blacks have immunability factors.
The CRA of 1964 has not been amended to include homosexuals,
transsexuals or those with gender dysphoria.

People with "identity" problems seem to be mentally ill and apparently
to fall under the ADA Americans with Disabilities Act.

Please cite where in the DSM V where it's classified as a mental
illness.

Post by #BeamMeUpScotty
Which means that diagnosing themselves and voting for laws for
themselves would be like letting the inmates run the asylum.
Much like letting the illegal aliens vote themselves citizenship.

Religious minorities have a proven history of persecution, while
others without immunability factors just have their claims...
claims based on how they "feel"....today.
Regardless of one's "feelings", people should not be disrespected
and free to do what they want in the privacy of their own home.

NOT when public health is considered, or are they violating my rights
and my kids rights when the government tries to force us to become a
petri dish for their vaccine experiments and when the ban us from
feeding the homeless from our personal kitchens?

When, in reality please, has that happened to you? Be sure to
include VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence when you answer.

Post by #BeamMeUpScotty
They can't have it both
ways, if they want privacy at home then we all get it, when we are at
home doing things that effect others.

How, exactly, are you "effected?"

Post by #BeamMeUpScotty

That said, society should not be required to accept the "feelings"
of others in the public sphere they would usually reject in private.

Forcing me to believe in gays that are NOT proven to be anything more
than mentally ill heterosexuals is the same as forcing a religion on me.

Please cite where in the DSM V homosexuality is listed. If your
presentation that it's a mental illness is true, you will offer the
cite requested. If you're lying, you will not.

Post by #BeamMeUpScotty
Or forcing me "to accept the gays" as part of their mental illness
treatment and the government has no power to force me to engage in the
treatment of mental illness for anyone. In fact some places have banned
anyone from treating the mental illness associated with gays sexual
identity. Which would then be banning me from accepting gay marriage as
a way to cure their mental illness. In those places you're damned if
you do and damned if you don't. The laws contradict one another.
Liberal/Democrats can't seem to make up their minds.

The thing is, homosexuality isn't a mental illness. But you'll
offer the DSM V cite I requested to prove me wrong. Unless, of course,
I'm not wrong.

[joeturn]

Post by KWills Shill #3
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:12:12 -0400, #BeamMeUpScotty

Post by #BeamMeUpScotty

Granting gays civil rights is "extreme"?
Does that also apply to civil rights for women and
blacks and religious minorities?

Unlike homosexuals, women and blacks have immunability factors.
The CRA of 1964 has not been amended to include homosexuals,
transsexuals or those with gender dysphoria.

People with "identity" problems seem to be mentally ill and apparently
to fall under the ADA Americans with Disabilities Act.

Please cite where in the DSM V where it's classified as a mental
illness.

Post by #BeamMeUpScotty
Which means that diagnosing themselves and voting for laws for
themselves would be like letting the inmates run the asylum.
Much like letting the illegal aliens vote themselves citizenship.

Religious minorities have a proven history of persecution, while
others without immunability factors just have their claims...
claims based on how they "feel"....today.
Regardless of one's "feelings", people should not be disrespected
and free to do what they want in the privacy of their own home.

NOT when public health is considered, or are they violating my rights
and my kids rights when the government tries to force us to become a
petri dish for their vaccine experiments and when the ban us from
feeding the homeless from our personal kitchens?

When, in reality please, has that happened to you? Be sure to
include VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence when you answer.

Post by #BeamMeUpScotty
They can't have it both
ways, if they want privacy at home then we all get it, when we are at
home doing things that effect others.

How, exactly, are you "effected?"

Post by #BeamMeUpScotty

That said, society should not be required to accept the "feelings"
of others in the public sphere they would usually reject in private.

Forcing me to believe in gays that are NOT proven to be anything more
than mentally ill heterosexuals is the same as forcing a religion on me.

Please cite where in the DSM V homosexuality is listed. If your
presentation that it's a mental illness is true, you will offer the
cite requested. If you're lying, you will not.

Post by #BeamMeUpScotty
Or forcing me "to accept the gays" as part of their mental illness
treatment and the government has no power to force me to engage in the
treatment of mental illness for anyone. In fact some places have banned
anyone from treating the mental illness associated with gays sexual
identity. Which would then be banning me from accepting gay marriage as
a way to cure their mental illness. In those places you're damned if
you do and damned if you don't. The laws contradict one another.
Liberal/Democrats can't seem to make up their minds.

The thing is, homosexuality isn't a mental illness. But you'll
offer the DSM V cite I requested to prove me wrong. Unless, of course,
I'm not wrong.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

Yours would be V61.21

http://psyweb.com/DSM_IV/jsp/DSM_VCodes.jsp

[KWills Shill #3]

On Sun, 10 Jun 2018 00:36:19 -0700 (PDT), joeturn <***@yahoo.com>
wrote:

[...]

Post by joeturn

Post by KWills Shill #3
The thing is, homosexuality isn't a mental illness. But you'll
offer the DSM V cite I requested to prove me wrong. Unless, of course,
I'm not wrong.

Yours would be V61.21
http://psyweb.com/DSM_IV/jsp/DSM_VCodes.jsp

I understand you're not play acting when you present yourself to
be very stupid. But even you should be able to figure out the link
doesn't claim homosexuality is a mental illness.
Further, I've never abused a child. But you will provide the
valid, verifiable evidence that I have. Failure will mean you lied.
Again.
Why are you ALWAYS so dishonest? I really want to know.

[joeturn]

Post by KWills Shill #3
[...]

Post by joeturn

Post by KWills Shill #3
The thing is, homosexuality isn't a mental illness. But you'll
offer the DSM V cite I requested to prove me wrong. Unless, of course,
I'm not wrong.

Yours would be V61.21
http://psyweb.com/DSM_IV/jsp/DSM_VCodes.jsp

I understand you're not play acting when you present yourself to
be very stupid. But even you should be able to figure out the link
doesn't claim homosexuality is a mental illness.
Further, I've never abused a child. But you will provide the
valid, verifiable evidence that I have. Failure will mean you lied.
Again.
Why are you ALWAYS so dishonest? I really want to know.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

mARSTON sHORES WILL BE ALONG DIRECTLY WITH YOUR paper work

[e***@yahoo.com]

Well, he will now that you’ve said his name!

[KWills Shill #3]

Post by joeturn

Post by KWills Shill #3
[...]

Post by joeturn

Post by KWills Shill #3
The thing is, homosexuality isn't a mental illness. But you'll
offer the DSM V cite I requested to prove me wrong. Unless, of course,
I'm not wrong.

Yours would be V61.21
http://psyweb.com/DSM_IV/jsp/DSM_VCodes.jsp

I understand you're not play acting when you present yourself to
be very stupid. But even you should be able to figure out the link
doesn't claim homosexuality is a mental illness.
Further, I've never abused a child. But you will provide the
valid, verifiable evidence that I have. Failure will mean you lied.
Again.
Why are you ALWAYS so dishonest? I really want to know.

mARSTON sHORES WILL BE ALONG DIRECTLY WITH YOUR paper work

Your acknowledgment of your lying is appreciated. But you didn't
answer the question I asked of you.
Do you really hate truth and honesty as much as you present?

[joeturn]

Post by #BeamMeUpScotty

Granting gays civil rights is "extreme"?
Does that also apply to civil rights for women and
blacks and religious minorities?

Unlike homosexuals, women and blacks have immunability factors.
The CRA of 1964 has not been amended to include homosexuals,
transsexuals or those with gender dysphoria.

People with "identity" problems seem to be mentally ill and apparently
to fall under the ADA Americans with Disabilities Act.
Which means that diagnosing themselves and voting for laws for
themselves would be like letting the inmates run the asylum.
Much like letting the illegal aliens vote themselves citizenship.

Religious minorities have a proven history of persecution, while
others without immunability factors just have their claims...
claims based on how they "feel"....today.
Regardless of one's "feelings", people should not be disrespected
and free to do what they want in the privacy of their own home.

NOT when public health is considered, or are they violating my rights
and my kids rights when the government tries to force us to become a
petri dish for their vaccine experiments and when the ban us from
feeding the homeless from our personal kitchens? They can't have it both
ways, if they want privacy at home then we all get it, when we are at
home doing things that effect others.

That said, society should not be required to accept the "feelings"
of others in the public sphere they would usually reject in private.

Forcing me to believe in gays that are NOT proven to be anything more
than mentally ill heterosexuals is the same as forcing a religion on me.
Or forcing me "to accept the gays" as part of their mental illness
treatment and the government has no power to force me to engage in the
treatment of mental illness for anyone. In fact some places have banned
anyone from treating the mental illness associated with gays sexual
identity. Which would then be banning me from accepting gay marriage as
a way to cure their mental illness. In those places you're damned if
you do and damned if you don't. The laws contradict one another.
Liberal/Democrats can't seem to make up their minds.
--
That's Karma
A homeless person can never be lost.

The homosexuals are not mentally ill,they suffer from a testosterone or estrogen deficiency.They are now considered to be outcast,but the governments have made them that way to lower the population. *Georgia Guide Stone # 1 commandment
Example: Albino African Blacks were once thought to be evil and were cast out of their society into the Caucas Mountain Range and after years of inbreeding the Causcasion Race was formed all because they were deficient in melanin.