On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 17:38:46 -0500, Rich Rostrom
Post by Rich RostromPost by a***@pacific.net.auPost by Daniel TitleyWhy exactly couldn't Franco capture Gibraltar?
Well, he's not actually said that he *couldn't* ... "makes a land
assault rather costly" doesn't mean "couldn't".
Thing is, the Spanish (Nationalist) army was, basically, crap. Sure,
they had had some experience fighting the Republicans, but that was
not in the same league as what would be needed to assault major
fortifications owned by a major power.
The Spanish Army was deficient in engineers and similar
specialists, but those can be trained. They did have a
very substantial core of men with real combat experience.
Well, they *did* ... at the end of the war. I wonder how many were
still under arms in 1940?
And, from what I have read, most of the "combat experience" (not all,
by any means!) was of fighting nothing at all like modern combat and,
often (again, not always!) not of a high intensity nature.
But, yes, I agree entirely ... they *could* have been trained. But
that would have taken time ... and that in itself is a problem.
Franco would have had to have pre-planned the operation well in
advance of actually implementing it. That means some pretty specific
training that would probably telegraph his intentions.
But think this ... he's not likely to start planning before 1939 and
the invasion of Poland ... he would be insane to take on the UK unless
the UK was involved pretty seriously somewhere else.
Given that even Hitler didn't think the UK and France would go to war
in 1939, I can't see Franco gambling on it.
And, once the UK and France *are* at war, that's even more of a reason
for Franco to do *nothing* to prepare ... if he attacks Gibraltar,
well, he's taking on (or has to plan to take on!) France in the rear
and the UK all around his coasts.
Which means that the planning is unlikely to take place before the
defeat of France ... which means its unlikely to take place before
1940.
So how long does this sort of training take? I'd guess *at least* six
months for a real army. For Franco's? Well, he'll have to acquire the
specialist equipment and build up supplies in the area as well. I'd
guess a lot more than six months for the Nationalists.
Do you have any idea/theory of how long it might have taken?
Post by Rich RostromPost by a***@pacific.net.auBut, that aside ... there's only one land approach to the Rock. From
memory it is only around 800 yards across. Now, the Germans figured
they would need best part of two corps (say 6 divisions) to take it
... problem is, they all have to attack through this 800 yard gap.
A gap that is overlooked by a 400+ meter high rock with emplaced heavy
artillery, steep slopes, and all sorts of fixed defences.
Well, that's one way of doing it. However - there are alternatives.
Such as bombarding the landward face of the Rock with artillery for
a couple of weeks first. Since the attacking artillery can be 5,000
to 8,000 meters away, concealed behind ridges, woods, or smokescreens,
the fort guns can't really do much counterbattery fire.
The Nationalists, from memory, didn't have a whole lot of heavy
artillery. I think that they had better guns than the ubiquitous 75s,
but I am not sure how many. I doubt that they had much really heavy
stuff ... and the Rock *does* have a fair bit of heavy stuff ;-)
And, of course, since the Spanish didn't have much in the way of an
airforce, either, it means that those guns are *probably* vulnerable
to naval gunfire support, too ... of course, I guess, the Spanish Navy
*could* try and prevent it ;-)
So, yes, you're right ... but there *are* some fairly obvious risks in
doing it. Especially if, as I believe was the proposition, the Spanish
do it by themselves ;-)
Post by Rich RostromHowever sturdy the gun emplacements are, they still have to have
firing slits, and if there are enough incoming shells, a few will hit
something useful. One could also target whatever AA positions there
area on top of the Rock. Eventually the north face will be softened up
enough to be vulnerable to assault. If the AA is knocked out, then
Axis aircraft can bomb anything visible with impunity.
Perhaps.
The Gibraltar defenses in Jan. 1941 consisted of:
2nd The Kings Regiment
2nd Somerset Light Infantry
4th Devonshire
4th Black Watch
3rd Heavy Regiment, Royal Artillery (previously "Gibraltar Coast
Defenses" and later redesignated 3rd Coast Regiment) controlled 4th,
26th, and 27th Batteries with 8 x 9.2-inch guns, 7 x 6-inch guns, and
6 x twin 6-pounders.
AA batteries, the 9th and 19th, defended Gibraltar from air attack
with 4 x 3-inch, 4 x 3.7-inch, and 2 x 40mm guns. HQ 10th AA Regiment
was later formed to control the two batteries.
The 82nd Heavy AA Regiment with three batteries (156th, 193rd, and
256th) including 16 3.7-inch guns, 8 x 40mm Bofors guns, and the first
radar sets.
http://www.derechos.org/nizkor/espana/doc/axis5.html
Notes of a Conversation Between the Fuehrer and the Spanish Minister
of the Interior Serrano Suñer in the Presence of the Reichs Foreign
Minister in Berlin on September 17, 1940.
"When Serrano Suñer for his part pointed again to the great strength
of the fortress of Gibraltar, the Fuehrer replied that an attack with
heavy artillery against an establishment of that type would not be as
effective as would be an operation with the special weapons used in
overwhelming the Maginot Line. Heavy aerial bombs had an effect many
times as great as the heaviest artillery and even the works of the
Maginot Line could not stand up under it, since armored structures
which according to World War experience could withstand the heaviest
artillery, had been annihilated by 1,000-, 1,400- and 1,800-kilogram
aerial bombs inside of ten minutes. Even when there was no direct hit,
the concussion effect of a 1,000-kilogram bomb was in itself
tremendous. Therefore, the decisive factor for the conquest and later
defense of Gibraltar is the guaranteeing of absolute air supremacy."
Post by Rich RostromA similar barrage, from the west side of Algeciras Bay, could smash
up the west side of the Rock.
Indeed. It could, but the same problems probably apply.
If the Spanish attempt to do it by themselves, they cannot guarantee
air superiority and naval superiority. And that means that, yes, while
they *can* probably take it ... they will suffer a *world* of hurt in
attempting it ;-)
Post by Rich RostromAnd here's another factor: the defenses of the Rock were never tested.
To my mind, that all but guarantees there were weaknesses that were
never anticipated. Furthermore, the defenses were nearly all built
decades before, I'd guess, and thus were not designed to resist the
newer weapons and methods available.
There are counter-arguments to be made. No amount of Allied bombing
could affect the U-boat pens at Lorient, St. Nazaire, and Brest -
and the living Rock was even stronger than reinforced concrete.
But I just can't believe in any 'untakeable fortress'; at least,
not during WW II. Too many 'impregnable fortresses' fell too
easily for that: Eben Emael, Corregidor, Sevastopol, Iwo Jima.
Don't get me wrong, I am *not* (and never have) saying that Gibraltar
*cannot* be taken. It could.
You're quite correct. There is *no such thing* as an impregnable
fortress ... but it would not fall easily to the *spanish* and, while
they were in the process of gutting the best part of their armed
forces in doing so, well, one presumes the UK is doing something ...
*all* around the Spanish coast.
Post by Rich RostromPost by a***@pacific.net.aub) can prevent reinforcement or resupply (even at night, against an RN
that would dominate the whole area!)
The RN will not "dominate the whole area". Once any significant
amount of Axis airpower is deployed to the area, the RN leaves.
Or bleeds, really bad. The nearest base, other than Gibraltar,
is Malta (not helpful). The next nearest base is Plymouth, 2,100
km away. With Spain in the war, Axis air dominates everywhere
south of, oh, 400 km N of Cape Finisterre.
Thing is, they can get supplies in at night. And bombard at night.
And, of course, as we've noted before, the Axis itself knew that it
could not actually supply forces in Spain by land ... which means that
they'd *have* to use the Italian Navy and Merchant Marine, and the RN
*could* and would gut them.
No, not prevent them from doing it, but make it a pyrrhic and
pointlessly meaningless "victory."
At the cost of turning the the whole peninsula into the "spanish
ulcer" a la the Peninsular War.
Post by Rich RostromAny attempt to resupply or reinforce Gibraltar by sea would be
a death ride to make PEDESTAL look like a milk run.
Not certain if it takes place at night ... but, say it was, it would
be no worse than the supply runs the Italians would be making to make
the assault possible ... suicide.
Pyrrhic victory.
Phil
Author, Space Opera (FGU), RBB #1 (FASA), Road to Armageddon (PGD).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: ***@pacific.net.au (not the munged address vs spambots)