FIRST THE QUESTION:
#541 / #478 (NEBULOUS CLOUD) WITHIN FRANCE UPON 11 NOVEMBER 2018 WORLD
WAR ONE CENTENNIAL WAS IT NATURAL OR SUPERNATURAL?
YOUTUBE: "Whatever It Takes (Imagine Dragons)"
http://youtu.be/gOsM-DYAEhY
WHAT ANSWER CAN YOU GIVE?
"We learn within Hebrews 11:1 that "...faith is the substance-HUPOSTASIS
(G5287) of things-PRAGMA (G4229) hoped-ELPIZŌ (G1679) for, the
evidence-ELEGCHOS (G1650) of things not seen-BLEPŌ (G991).
For by it the elders {ie. Great Sanhedrin ("sitting together," hence
"assembly" or "council") of #71 (whether inclusive of High Priest) met
in the Hall of Hewn Stones in the Temple in Jerusalem
#364 - QUESTIONS OF #364 - *QUESTIONS* {
#364 as [#7, #8, #300, #8, #40, #1] = zetema (G2213): {UMBRA: #10 as
#364 % #41 = #36} 1) a question, debate; 1a) about the law; 2) #509 -
YAHAD / #2184 - 'OTH CYCLE
} *OF* #430 - *LAW* {
#430 as [#50, #70, #40, #70, #200] = nomos (G3551): {UMBRA: #25 as #430
% #41 = #20} 1) anything established, anything received by usage, a
custom, a law, a command; 1a) of any law whatsoever; 1a1) *A* *LAW* *OR*
*RULE* *PRODUCING* *A* *STATE* *APPROVED* *OF* *GOD*; 1a1a) by the
observance of which is approved of God; 1a2) a precept or injunction;
1a3) *THE* *RULE* *OF* *ACTION* *PRESCRIBED* *BY* *REASON*; 1b) of the
Mosaic law, and referring, acc. to the context. either to the volume of
the law or to its contents; 1c) *THE* *CHRISTIAN* *RELIGION*: *THE*
*LAW* *DEMANDING* *FAITH*, *THE* *MORAL* *INSTRUCTION* *GIVEN* *BY*
*CHRIST*, *ESPECIALLY* *THE* *PRECEPT* *CONCERNING* *LOVE*; 1d) the name
of the more important part (the Pentateuch), is put for the entire
collection of the sacred books of the Old Testament
} AS EXPLANTATION AND SUBSTANTIATION MADE OF A LEGITIMATE IDENTITY
JEWISH / CHRISTIAN APOSTLES {ie. SECT OF NAZARENES / #509 - YAHAD DEAD
SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY
REGARDING PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 -
ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY}
V'S
PRINCIPLE OF #391 - HOMOGENEOUS STEWARDSHIP {#2184 - (#390 + #312 +
#390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 = #273 - *MOMENT*}
#371 as [#30, #40, #100, #200, #1] = miqra' (H4744): {#4 as #341} 1)
convocation, convoking, reading, a calling together; 1a) convocation,
*SACRED* *ASSEMBLY*; 1b) convoking; 1c) reading; / [#6, #70, #90, #200,
#5] = `atsarah (H6116): {#5 as #365} 1) assembly, solemn assembly; 1a)
assembly (sacred or festive meeting); 1b) assemblage, company, group}.
} obtained a good report. Through faith we understand that the worlds
were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not
made of things which do appear." [Hebrews 11:1-3 (KJV)]
A NICE DEFINITION OF FAITH. THE WORD SUBSTANCE IS UPOSTASIS IN THE
GREEK. THIS COMES FROM THE GREEK WORD HYPOSTASIS.
Hypostasis (Greek: ὑπόστασις) is the underlying state or underlying
substance and is the fundamental reality that supports all else. In
Neoplatonism the hypostasis of the soul, the intellect (nous) and "the
one" was addressed by Plotinus.
5287 hypóstasis(from 5259 /hypó, "under" and 2476 /hístēmi, "to stand")
– properly, (to possess) standing under a guaranteed agreement
("title-deed"); (figuratively) "title" to a promise or property, i.e. a
legitimate claim (because it literally is, "under a legal-standing") –
entitling someone to what is guaranteed under the particular agreement.
We might also conclude that the Greek word *hypostasis* as substance is
equivalent to the cognitive notion of #41 - ONTIC NECESSITY as conveying
epistemological premise to effectual understanding (ie. material
substance, by which appearances are cognised).
#CENTER – YELLOW DRAGON - Earth (黃龍):
The Yellow Emperor or Yellow Deity was conceived by a *VIRGIN* *MOTHER*,
*FUBAO* (aka. EGYPTIAN ISIS / ROMAN CATHOLICISM *VIRGIN* *MARY*), who
became pregnant after seeing a yellow ray of light turning around the
Northern Dipper (in Chinese theology the principal symbol of God).
Twenty four months later the Yellow Emperor was born and was associated
to the colour yellow because it is the colour of the Earth (Dì 地), the
material substance, in which he incarnated.
YOUTUBE: "Children of the Dragon"
http://youtu.be/zidURLIcoGA
The Yellow Emperor was said to have turned in the form of the Yellow
Dragon at the end of his life, to ascend to Heaven. Since the Chinese
consider him to be their ancestor, they sometimes refer to themselves as
"children of the dragon". This legend also contributed towards the use
of the Chinese dragon as a symbol of imperial power.
Plato loved this word. He used it quite a bit in his Plato’s Republic.
In this work Plato speaks of a group of prisoners who spend their lives
in a cave {ie.
In the same sense of the Roman Mithraeum @1 (SOUTH: #1), @5, #65
(CENTRE: #5), #175 (WEST: #7) cosmogonic regeneration {#5 AS
DODECAHEDRON + #7 AS ICOSAHEDRON = #10 AS TETRACTYS} methodology
deploying a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL(NORTH) with a stoicheion of 64
elements as north-south-east-west + 60 x 6 7/80 chimera of reality of
the sacred sun as the Julian calendar 365.25 days
} watching the outside world only from the shadows it reflects inside
the cave. In the words of Plato he calls the outside world upostasis or
the reality.
FOUR MALE SYMBOLS (四象) OF SIGNS (OF HEAVENS, APPROVAL, ETC) AS ADVISORS
(四輔 - SÌFǓ) UPON THE CHARIOTS OF TWENTY-EIGHT LUNAR MANSiONS
- East – Azure Dragon (青龍) assigned to the Spring equinox (#21)
- South – Vermilion Bird (朱雀) assigned to the Summer solstice (#41)
- West – White Tiger (白虎) assigned to the Autumn equinox (#61)
- North – Black Tortoise (玄武) assigned to the Winter solstice (#1)
- Center – Yellow Dragon (黃龍) Earth AND THE HIEROS LOGOS AS THE FAUX
LOGICAL GROUNDING OF INFINITY
They can be considered as the equivalent to the zodiacal constellations
in Western astronomy, though the Twenty-eight Mansions reflect the
movement of the Moon through a sidereal month rather than the Sun within
a tropical year.
As it is written within the Scriptures of the elect, so as to be a help
within a time of necessity: "In this manner the year is completed
scrupulously in three hundred sixty-four [#364 days as the] fixed
stations of the cosmos. Thus the signs, durations of time, the years,
and the days were shown to me by the angel Uriel, whom the Lord, God of
eternal glory, has appointed over the luminaries of heaven--(both) in
heaven and the world--in order that they--the sun, the moon, the stars,
and all the created objects which circulate in all the *CHARIOTS* of
heaven--should rule in the face of the sky and be seen on the earth to
be guides for the day and the night. Likewise Uriel showed me twelve
wide openings in the sky, along the course of the chariots of the sun,
from which" the rays of the sun break out and from which heat is
diffused upon the earth, when they are opened during the designated
seasons.
- NORTH (WINTER/WATER AS #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE) – BLACK TORTOISE
(玄武): #8 - Dipper (斗 - Dǒu), #9 - Ox (牛 - ), #10 - Girl (女 - Nǚ), #11 -
Emptiness (虛 - Xū), #12 - Rooftop (危 - Wēi), #13 - Encampment (室 - Shì),
#14 - Wall (壁 - Bì)
DAN {JUDGMENT; HE THAT JUDGES} #16 = #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE:
{AYIN}
IV - The Governor General, *so* *far* *as* *We* *Ourselves* *lawfully*
*may*, *upon* *sufficient* *cause* *to* *him* *appearing*, *may*
*remove* *from* *his* *office*, *or* *suspend* *from* *the* *exercise*
*of* *the* *same*, *any* *person* *exercising* *any* *office* of Our
said Commonwealth, under or by *VIRTUE* *OF* *ANY*--Commission or
Warrant granted, *or* *which* *may* *be* *granted*, *by* *Us* *in* *Our*
*name* *or* *under* *Our* *authority*.
ASHER {HAPPINESS} #18 = #6 - FORM OF NATURE: {TSADE}
VI - And whereas by 'The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
1900,' it is amongst other things enacted, that we may authorise the
Governor General to APPOINT any person or persons, jointly or severally,
to be his Deputy or Deputies within any part of Our Commonwealth, *and*
*in* *that* *capacity* *to* *exercise*, during the pleasure of the
Governor General *such* *POWERS*, *and* *FUNCTIONS* of the said Governor
General as he thinks fit to assign to such Deputy or Deputies, subject
to any *LIMITATIONS* and directions as aforesaid, to APPOINT any person
or persons, jointly or severally. To be his Deputy or Deputies within
any part of Our said Commonwealth of Australia, and in that capacity to
exercise, during his pleasure, *such* *of* *his* *POWERS* *and*
*FUNCTIONS*, *as* *he* *may* *deem* *it* *necessary *or* *expedient*
*to* *assign* to him or them: *Provided* *always*, *that* the
APPOINTMENT of such a Deputy or Deputies *shall* *not* *affect* *the*
*exercise* *by* *the* *Governor* *General* *himself* *of* *any* *POWER*
*or* *FUNCTION*.
NAPHTALI {THAT STRUGGLES OR FIGHTS} #19 = #7 - ENGENDERING NATURE: {QOPH
- *OATHS* OF DIEU ET MON DROIT}
VII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *declare* *Our* *pleasure* *to* *be*
*that*, *in* *the* *event* of death, *INCAPACITY*, removal, or absence
of Our said Governor General out of Our said Commonwealth, *and* *all*
*and* *EVERY* *THE* *POWERS* *AND* *AUTHORITIES* herein granted to him
shall until Our further pleasure is signified therein, be vested in such
person as may be APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and Signet to be
Our Lieutenant Governor of Our said Commonwealth: or if there shall be
no such Lieutenant Governor in Our said Commonwealth, then in such
person or persons as may be APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and
Signet to administer the Government of the same. *No* *SUCH* *POWERS*
*OR* *AUTHORITIES* *SHALL* *VEST* in such Lieutenant Governor, or such
other person or persons, *UNTIL* *HE* *OR* *THEY* *SHALL* *HAVE* *TAKEN*
*THE* *OATHS* *APPOINTED* to be taken by the Governor General of Our
said Commonwealth, and in the manner provided by the Instructions
accompanying these Our Letters Patent.
- SOUTH (SUMMER/FIRE AS #9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE) – VERMILION BIRD (朱雀):
#22 - Well (井 - Jǐng), #23 - Ghost (鬼 - Guǐ), #24 - Willow (柳 - Liǔ),
#25 - Star (星 - Xīng), #26 - Extended Net - (張 - Zhāng) Wings (翼 - Yì),
#28 - Chariot (軫 - Zhěn)
REUBEN {WHO SEES THE SON; THE VISION OF THE SON} #8 - TRANSFORMING
NATURE / #5 - ACT OF NATURE: {CHETH / ARCHANGELS (Gk. Archaggelos - a
chief angel)}
SIMEON {THAT HEARS OR OBEYS; THAT IS HEARD} #9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE / #6
- FORM OF NATURE: {TETH / ANGELS (Gk. Aggelos - a messenger; especially
an 'angel'; by implication a church pastor or ecclesiastic)}
GAD {A BAND; A TROOP} #10 - TOTALITY OF NATURE / #7 - ENGENDERING
NATURE: {YOD / Sovereignty}
- EAST (SPRING/WOOD AS #7 - ENGENDERING NATURE) – AZURE DRAGON (青龍): #1
- Horn (角 - Jiăo), #2 - Neck (亢 - Kàng), #3 - Root (氐 - Dĭ), #4 - Room
(房 - Fáng), #5 - *HEART* (心 - Xīn), #6 - Tail (尾- Wěi), #7 - Winnowing
Basket (箕 - Jī)
JUDAH {THE PRAISE OF THE LORD; CONFESSION} #5 - ACT OF NATURE / #2 -
NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {HE / *VIRTUES* (Gk. Arete - excellence
(intrinsic or attributed):--praise, virtue)}
ISSACHAR {REWARD; RECOMPENSE} #6 - FORM OF NATURE / #3 - NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE: {VAV / *POWERS* (Gk. Arche - a commencement, or
(concrete) *chief* (*in* *various* *applications* *of* *order*, *time*,
*place* *or* *rank*):--beginning, corner, (at the, the) first (estate),
*magistrate*, power, principality, principle, rule)}
ZEBULUN {DWELLING; HABITATION} #7 - ENGENDERING NATURE / #4 - NATURE
AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: {ZAYIN / *PRINCIPALITIES* (Gk. Exousia - (in the
sense of ability); privilege, that is, (subjectively) *force*, capacity,
competency, freedom, or (objectively) *MASTERY* (concretely magistrate,
superhuman, potentate, *token* *of* *control*), delegated
influence:--authority, jurisdiction, liberty, power, right, strength)}
- WEST (AUTUMN/METAL AS #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE) – WHITE TIGER
(白虎): #15 (3x3 = 9 as #15) - Legs (奎 - Kuí), #16 (4x4 = 16 as #34) -
Bond (婁 - Lóu), #17 (5x5 = 25 as #65) - Stomach (胃 - Wèi), #18 (6x6 = 36
as #111) - Hairy Head (昴 - Mǎo), #19 (7x7 = 49 as #175) - Net (畢 - Bì),
#20 (8x8 = 64 as #260) - Turtle Beak (觜 - Zī), #21 (9x9 = 81 as #369) -
Three Stars (參 - Shēn)
EPHRAIM {FRUITFUL; INCREASING} #12 = #9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE: {LAMED /
General Populace}
And whereas We did on the 17th day of September, 1900, by and with the
advice of Our Privy Council declare by proclamation that, on and after
the 1st day of January, 1901, the people of New South Wales, Victoria,
South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania and also Western Australia,
should be united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia: And whereas by
the said recited Act certain *POWERS*, *FUNCTIONS*, *and* *AUTHORITIES*
*were* *declared* to be vested in the Governor General: And whereas We
are *desirous* *of* *making* *effectual* *and* *permanent* *provision*
for the office of Governor General and Commander in chief in and over
Our said Commonwealth of Australia, without making new Letters Patent on
each demise of the said office. *Now* *know* *ye* *that* *We* *have*
*thought* *fit* *to* *constitute*, *ORDER*, *and* *DECLARE*, *and* *do*
*by* *these* *PRESENTS* *CONSTITUTE* *ORDER*, *and* *DECLARE*, that
there shall be a Governor General and *Commander* *in* *Chief*
(hereinafter called the Governor General) in and over Our Commonwealth
of Australia (hereinafter called Our said Commonwealth), and that the
person who shall fill the said office of *Governor* *General* *shall*
*be* *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME* *APPOINTED* by Commission under Our Sign
Manual and Signet.
MANASSEH {FORGETFULNESS; HE THAT IS FORGOTTEN} #14 = #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {NUN}
II - There shall be a Great Seal of and for Our said Commonwealth which
Our said Governor General shall keep and use for sealing all things
whatsoever that shall pass the said Great Seal. Provided that *until*
*a* *Great* *Seal* *shall* *be* *provided* *the* *Private* *Seal* *of*
*Our* *said* *Governor* *General* *may* *be* *used* *as* *the* *Great*
*Seal* of the Commonwealth of Australia.
BENJAMIN {SON OF THE RIGHT HAND} #15 = #3 -NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {SAMEK}
III - The Governor General *may* *constitute* *and* *APPOINT*, in Our
name and on Our behalf, all such *Judges*, *Commissioners*, *Justices*
*of* *the* *Peace*, *and* *other* *necessary* *officers* *and*
*Ministers* of Our said Commonwealth, as may be lawfully constituted or
APPOINTED by Us.
This is translated in the KJV Bible as substance. Plato uses the word
*EPISKIAZO* for the shadows. This is the same word used in [Hebrews
11:1] for hope. C.S. Lewis described this world as a shadow of the
reality which was the spiritual world. This physical world and all we
see is merely a shadow of the reality of the spiritual world. Like
Plato’s prisoners in the cave they interpreted the reality in light of
the shadow and their perception of reality was distorted. The Aramaic
Bible I thinks expands on this. The Aramaic word for hope is sabara
which in its Semitic origins has the idea of a positive imagination. The
Septuagint uses the Greek word which we render as hope episkiazo for the
Hebrew word hagah which is the word for imagination. I believe what Paul
is saying here is that faith is the reality of your positive
imagination. When you see a shadow you imagine the reality behind the
shadow. You do not see the reality you can only imagine it. It is the
evidence of things not seen. The Greek word for evidence is elegchos
which is an inner conviction. The Aramaic uses the word gelyana which
means a manifestation.
[<http://www.chaimbentorah.com/2015/01/word-study-positive-imagination-סברא/>]
EPISKIAZO@[#5, {@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5)}
#80, {@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85)}
#10, {@3: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 10 (#95)}
#200, {@4: Sup: 52 (#75); Ego: 38 (#133)}
#20, {@5: Sup: 72 (#147); Ego: 20 (#153)}
#10, {@6: Sup: 1 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 10 (#163)}
#1, {@7: Sup: 2 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 1 (#164 -
CHRONOLOGICAL PLANE MAPPING WITH #369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR
@5 - ACT OF NATURE)}
#200, {@8: Sup: 40 (#190); Ego: 38 (#202)}
#5, {@9: Sup: 45 (#235 - KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: *THE* *APPREHENSION*
*OF* *THE* *MANIFOLD* *OF* *APPEARANCES* *IS* *ALWAYS* *SUCCESSIVE*);
Ego: 5 (#207)}
#10] {@10: Sup: 55 (#290 - KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: @290); Ego: 10 (#217)}
}
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) IDEA: @290: “That one could, without
detracting from the actual existence of outer things, say of a great
many of their predicates: they belong not to these things in themselves,
but only to their appearances and have no existence of their own outside
our representation, is something that was generally accepted and
acknowledged long before Locke’s time, though more commonly thereafter.
To these predicates belong warmth, color, taste, etc. That I, however,
even beyond these, include (for weighty reasons) also among mere
appearances the remaining qualities of bodies, which are called
primarias: extension, place, and more generally space along with
everything that depends on it (impenetrability or materiality, shape,
etc.), is something against which not the least ground of uncertainty
can be raised; and as little as someone can be called an idealist
because he wants to admit colors as properties that attach not to the
object in itself, but only to the sense of vision as modifications, just
as little can my system be called idealist simply because I find that
even more of, nay, all of the properties that make up the intuition of a
body belong merely to its appearance: for the existence of the thing
that appears is not thereby nullified, as with real idealism, but it is
only shown that through the senses we cannot cognize it at all as it is
in itself.
I would very much like to know how then my claims must be framed so as
not to contain any idealism. Without doubt I would have to say: that the
representation of space not only is perfectly in accordance with the
relation that our sensibility has to objects, for I have said that, but
that it is even fully similar to the object; an assertion to which I can
attach no sense, any more than to the assertion that the sensation of
red is similar to the property of cinnabar that excites this sensation
in me.” [p 40, 41]
#541 as [#5, #80, #10, #200, #20, #10, #1, #200, #5, #10] = episkiazo
(G1982): {#55 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *TO* *THROW* *A* *SHADOW* *UPON*,
*TO* *ENVELOP* *IN* *A* *SHADOW*, *TO* *OVERSHADOW* from a vaporous
cloud that casts a shadow the word is transferred to a shining cloud
surrounding and enveloping persons with brightness. Used of the Holy
Spirit exerting creative energy upon the womb of the virgin Mary and
impregnating it (a use of the word which seems to have been drawn from
the familiar Old Testament idea of a cloud as symbolising the immediate
presence and power of God);
“For we wrestle not against flesh-SARX / HUMAN and blood (ANIMAL /
HUMAN), but against principalities-ARCHĒ (G746), against powers-EXOUSIA
(G1849), against the rulers-KOSMOKRATŌR / EPITHET FOR SATAN (G2888) of
the darkness-SKOTOS / SHADINESS, THAT IS, OBSCURITY (G4655) of this
world-AIŌN (G165), against spiritual wickedness (ie. SUPERNATURAL PLOTS)
in high [places].” [Ephesians 6:12 (KJV)]
KOSMOKRATŌR / EPITHET FOR SATAN (G2888) @[κ, {@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20
(#20)}
ο, {@2: Sup: 9 (#29); Ego: 70 (#90)}
ς, {@3: Sup: 47 (#76); Ego: 38 (#128)}
μ, {@4: Sup: 6 (#82); Ego: 40 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26})}
ο, {@5: Sup: 76 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 70 (#238)}
κ, {@6: Sup: 15 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}); Ego: 20
(#258)}
ρ, {@7: Sup: 34 (#207); Ego: 19 (#277 - *RIGHT* *TO* *PLACE* *A* *TEST*)}
α, {@8: Sup: 35 (#242); Ego: 1 (#278)}
τ, {@9: Sup: 11 (#253); Ego: 57 (#335)}
ω, {@10: Sup: 1 (#254); Ego: 71 (#406)}
ρ] {@11: Sup: 20 (#274 - RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS ON NOVICHOK #274 -
PERFUME POISONING); Ego: 19 (#425)}
TETRAGRAMMATON {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} HIERARCHY
VALUE AS THE METAPHYSICAL CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE TO THE HOMOIOS THEORY
OF *NUMBER*:
+ 0, 27 {IDEA: @311}, 54 {IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN
- *FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
+ 0, 9 {IDEA: @282}, 18 {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH
- *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}
+ 1 {IDEA: @265, @266}, 2 {IDEA: @267, @268 - *SYNTHETIC* *JUDGMENTS*
*REQUIRE* *A* *PRINCIPLE* *OTHER* *THAN* *THE* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* #312 -
*CONTRADICTION*, @269, @272, @273 - ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 = #273 -
*MOMENT* / *** *FORMULA* *FOR* *PRESERVING* *EUROPEAN* *AUTONOMY* ***,
@274 - PERFUME}, 3 {IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF*
*PROGRESSION* OF INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}
A PROCESS OF #236 - PAIRING RELATIVITY INTENTIONED UPON IMPLEMENTATION
OF A #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL WHICH GIVEN THE ABSENCE OF ANY VIABLE
*REVERSE*-*TRANSCRIPTASE* *INHIBITOR* NATURAL PROCESS (AS DISCUSSED
BELOW WITH THE: #288 - META SCHEMA ACQUIESCENCE {*REGENERATION*}: @1 -
@728 - PASSOVER {#ONE: FRIDAY OF 3 APRIL 33 AD}, @5 - PENTECOST {#FIVE:
+ 7x7+1 AS 50 DAYS ON 23 MAY WHICH *CONFLICTS* *WITH* *ARCHBISHOP*
*GEORGE* *PELL'S* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* AT SAINT PATRICK'S CATHOLIC
CATHEDRAL, MELBOURNE UPON PENTECOST SUNDAY / BEERSHEBA MEMORIAL DAY OF
31 MAY 1998 AND PENTECOST {#382 - *THE* *SCIENCE* *INTO* *A* *PERMANENT*
*STATE*; #383; #384; #385; #386} OF SUNDAY 21 JUNE 2000 (SOLAR ECLIPSE
YEAR FOLLOWING: Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#382 / #385} / HETEROS {#384 /
#386} / TORAH {#378 / #383}):
#337 as [#30, #50, #7, #200, #10, #40] = naziyr (H5139): {UMBRA: #7 as
#267 % #41 = #21} 1) consecrated or devoted one, Nazarite; 1a)
*CONSECRATED* *ONE*; 1b) *DEVOTEE*, Nazarite; 1c) untrimmed (vine);
#474 as [#100, #4, #10, #300, #10, #50] = qaddiysh (Aramaic) (H6922):
{UMBRA: #6 as #414 % #41 = #4} 1) *HOLY*, *SEPARATE*; 2) (TWOT)
*ANGELS*, *SAINTS*;
AS BEING COGENT #364 - *QUESTIONS* *OF* #430 - *LAW* BY EXPLANTATION AND
SUBSTANTIATION MADE OF A LEGITIMATE IDENTITY TO JEWISH / CHRISTIAN
APOSTLES AS A SECTARIAN ASSOCIATION OF NAZARENES / #509 - YAHAD DEAD SEA
SCROLL COMMUNITY [Acts 24:1-6; Acts 28:17-22] WHICH WAS INITIALLY
CONVEYED WITHIN OUR INSTRUCTIONS TO LEGAL COUNSEL DATED 18 NOVEMBER 2018
}, @65, #175 THEURGIC COSMOGONIC SYNCRETISM) OF NEOPLATONISM COMMONLY
USED BY PYTHAGOREAN NUMBER DERIVED GOVERNANCE (ROMAN CATHOLICISM / ISLAM
etc)
YOUTUBE: "Vincent Van Gogh (d. 29 July 1890) - Starry starry night
(doctor who)"
http://youtu.be/ro5Aui3Zu9E
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECOND ANALOGY - PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION
ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY [IDEA: B232] AS ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE
PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF CAUSE AND EFFECT:
PROOF: I perceive that *APPEARANCES* *SUCCEED* *ONE* *ANOTHER*, *THAT*
*IS*, *THAT* [IDEA: @B233] *ONE* *STATE* *OF* *A* *THING* *EXISTS* *AT*
*ONE* *TIME*, *THE* *OPPOSITE* *OF* *WHICH* *EXISTED* *IN* *THE*
*PREVIOUS* *STATE*. *I* *AM* *THEREFORE* *ACTUALLY* *CONNECTING* *TWO*
*PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *TIME*. Now connection is no act of mere sense and
intuition, but is here the product of a *SYNTHETIC* *FACULTY* *OF* *THE*
*IMAGINATION* *THAT* *DETERMINES* *THE* *INNER* *SENSE* *WITH* *RESPECT*
*TO* *RELATION* *IN* *TIME*. The imagination can however conjoin the
aforementioned two states in two different ways, so that either one or
the other would precede in time; for time cannot be perceived in itself
and what precedes and what follows in objects determined, as it were
empirically, in relation to it. *I* *AM* *THEREFORE* *CONSCIOUS* *ONLY*
*THAT* *MY* *IMAGINATION* *PLACES* *ONE* *STATE* *BEFORE*, *THE* *OTHER*
*AFTER*, not that in the object [IDEA: @B234] one precedes the other;
or, in other words, the objective relation of the appearances that
succeed one another remains undetermined through mere perception. In
order then for this relation to be cognized as determined, the relation
between the two states must be so thought that it is thereby determined
with necessity which of them must be placed before, which after, and not
the reverse. However, the concept that carries with it a necessity of
synthetic unity can only be a pure concept of the understanding, which
does not lie in perception – and here it is the concept of the relation
of cause and effect, in which the former determines the latter in time
as consequence, and not merely as something that could precede it in the
imagination (or not be perceived at all). It is, then, only because we
subject the succession of appearances, hence all alterations, to the law
of causality that experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the
appearances – is possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects
of experience are possible only in accordance with this very law.
@1 = Position {#237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCEFUL* *WILL* AS *METHOD* *TO*
*ENFORCE* *OBMUTESCENCE*}
@2 = Poise {#236 - PAIRING}
@3 = Purpose {#238 / #77 - Natural Guide, Heaven's Reason; I-Ching: H12
- Obstruction, Standstill (stagnation), Selfish persons; Tetra: 57 -
Guardedness}
@4 = Process {#239 / #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming}
@5 = Pairing {#236} / DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN NATURE: #369)"
*THE* *APPREHENSION* *OF* *THE* *MANIFOLD* *OF* *APPEARANCES* *IS*
*ALWAYS* *SUCCESSIVE*. [IDEA: @A189] The representations of the parts
succeed one another. Whether they also succeed one another in the object
is a further point for reflection, which is not included in the first
point. Now one can in fact call everything, and even every
representation insofar as one is conscious of it, an object; but it is a
matter for deeper investigation what this word is to signify regarding
[IDEA: @B235] appearances, not insofar as they (as representations) are
objects, but only in so far as they designate an object. In as much as
they, merely as representations, [IDEA: @A190] are at the same time
objects of consciousness, they are not at all to be distinguished from
apprehension, i.e., reception into the synthesis of the imagination, and
one must then say: that the manifold of appearances is always generated
successively in the mind. Were appearances things in themselves, then no
human being would be able to conclude from the succession of
representations how the manifold of those appearances might be conjoined
in the object. For in the end we have to do only with our own
representations; how things in themselves may be (without regard to
representations through which they affect us) is completely beyond our
sphere of cognition. Now although the appearances are not things in
themselves, and nevertheless are the only thing that can be given to us
for cognition, I still have to show what in the appearances themselves
may suit the manifold for a conjoining in time, notwithstanding that its
representation in apprehension is always successive. Thus, for example,
the apprehension of the manifold in the appearances of a house that
stands before me is successive. Now the question is: whether the
manifold of this house itself also is successive in itself, which of
course no one will grant. However, as soon as I raise my concept of an
object up to transcendental significance, the house is now indeed no
thing in itself, but [IDEA: @B236] only an appearance, i.e., a
representation, whose transcendental object is [IDEA: @A191] unknown;
what, then, shall I understand by the question: (ie. *EH*... *WHICH*
*POPULARITY* *DID* *YOU* *SAY*..?} how might the manifold be conjoined
in the appearance itself (*WHICH* *IS* *STILL* *NOTHING* *IN* *ITSELF*)?
That which lies in the successive apprehension is here viewed as
representation, while the appearance that is given to me,
notwithstanding that it is nothing more than a sum of such
representations, is viewed as their object – with which my concept,
which I extract from the representations of apprehension, has to agree.
Since truth is the agreement of cognition with object, it can easily be
seen that here one can ask only about the formal conditions of empirical
truth, and that appearance, in counter-relation with the representations
of apprehension, can only be represented as their object that is
distinct from them if it falls under a rule that distinguishes it from
every other apprehension and makes one way of conjoining the manifold
necessary. That in the appearance which contains the condition of this
necessary rule of apprehension is the object.
Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [IDEA:
@B237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCEFUL* *WILL*
*METHOD* *TO* *ENFORCE* *OBMUTESCENCE* WHICH IS THE ACT OF BECOMING MUTE
OR SILENT—USUALLY A STUBBORN, WILLFUL ACT; IF YOU ARE INCLINED TO
SILENCE, YOU ARE OBMUTESCENT] cannot be perceived empirically unless
preceded by an appearance that [IDEA: @A192] does not contain this state
in itself; for a *REALITY* following upon an empty time, hence, a coming
to be that no state of things precedes, can be apprehended just as
little as empty time itself. Every apprehension of an event is therefore
a perception that follows upon another perception. Since this is,
though, the case with every synthesis of apprehension, as I have shown
above in the appearance of a house, it does not in this way yet
distinguish itself from the others. But I also note: that if, in an
appearance containing a happening, I call the preceding state of
perception A {ie. *POPALARITY* *AS* *PEDIGREE* *OF* *A* *PASHTUN*
*KING*} and the succeeding one B {ie. *MACRON’S* *POPULARITY*}, then B
can only follow A in the apprehension, while the perception A cannot
follow but only precede B. I see for example a ship drifting downstream.
My perception of its location further down succeeds the perception of
its location further up the course of the river, and it is impossible
that in the apprehension of this appearance the ship should first be
perceived further downstream but afterwards further upstream. Here,
then, the order in the succession of perceptions in the apprehension is
determined, and the apprehension is bound by that order. In the previous
example of a house, in the apprehension my perceptions could start at
the [IDEA: @B238] top of the house and end with the ground, or else
start from below and end above, just as they could apprehend the
manifold of empirical intuition from the right or the left. In the
series of these perceptions there [IDEA: @A193] was, then, no determined
order making it necessary when in the apprehension I had to begin in
order to conjoin the manifold empirically. This rule is, however, always
to be met with in the perception of something that happens, and it makes
the order of the perceptions succeeding one another (in the apprehension
of this appearance) necessary.
In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing
about the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is
completely arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the
order of the manifold of the appearance according to which the
apprehension of the one (what happens) follows upon that of the other
(which precedes) according to a rule. Only in this way can I gain the
right to say of the appearance itself, and not merely of my
apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be found – which is as much as
to say that I cannot institute the apprehension otherwise than exactly
in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEAS: @B232 TO @B238 / @A189 TO
@A193]
TORRENTIAL STORM EVENT: 2.6.6.44.0@{
@1: Sup: 44 (#44); Ego: 44 (#44),
@2: Sup: 7 (#51); Ego: 44 (#88),
@3: Sup: 71 (#122); Ego: 64 (#152),
@4: Sup: 18 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 28 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
@5: Sup: 8 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 71 (#251),
@6: Sup: 8 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 81 (#332),
@7: Sup: 36 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}); Ego: 28
(#360 - ANKH ROMAN TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE),
@8: Sup: 20 (#212); Ego: 65 (#425),
@9: Sup: 56 (#268 - *SYNTHETIC* *JUDGMENTS* *REQUIRE* *A*
*PRINCIPLE* *OTHER* *THAN* *THE* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* #312 -
*CONTRADICTION*); Ego: 36 (#461),
Male: #268; Feme: #461
}
To illustrate this POINT of #541 as [#5, #80, #10, #200, #20, #10, #1,
#200, #5, #10] = episkiazo (G1982): {#55 as #541 % #41 = #8} *AS* *AN*
*IDEA* *OF* *A* *CLOUD* *AS* *SYMBOLISING* *THE* *IMMEDIATE* *PRESENCE*
*AND* *POWER* *OF* *GOD* at about 1425 HOURS ON 15 DECEMBER 2018 as I
was sitting in with the RESTAURANT having my customary SABBATH meal
there was a very localised TORRENTIAL STORM EVENT which lasted about 10
MINUTES and it was so tumultuous that people left their tables to look
out the windows.
Nous: #44
Time: 14:25 hrs
Date: 2018.10.30
Torah: [#40, #2, #5]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 42 (#82); Ego: 2 (#42),
@3: Sup: 47 (#129); Ego: 5 (#47),
Male: #129; Feme: #47
} // #47
Dao: Moderate Values, Setting Up Precepts
Tetra: #36 - Strength
I-Ching: H1 - Pure Yang, Creative Principle/Heaven, Force, Strong
action, The key, God
Latin: Amabilis {Conservative God} Alt: Yahhael {God is the God} {
1. PROTECTS & HELPS AGAINST THOSE WISHING TO USURP THE FORTUNES OF OTHERS
2. JUSTICE, TRUTH & LIBERTY
3. PROTECTS TRUTH, LOVERS OF JURISPRUDENCE
4. Thesogar
}
Solar Eclipse: 20 March 2015 (AEST)
Heber {The region beyond, One that passes; anger}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#268 - *SYNTHETIC* *JUDGMENTS* *REQUIRE* *A*
*PRINCIPLE* *OTHER* *THAN* *THE* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* #312 - *CONTRADICTION*
/ #461} / HETEROS {#296 / #475} / TORAH {#252 / #453}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:6,col:6,nous:44&idea:{m,51}&idea:{f,88}&idea:{m,268}&idea:{f,461}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 2, row: 6, col: 6, nous: 44 [Date: 2018.10.30, Time:
14:25 hrs, Super: #268 / #7 - Intentional Reversal, Dimming Radiance;
I-Ching: H12 - Obstruction, Stagnation, Selfish persons; Tetra: 56 -
Closed Mouth, Ego: #461 / #44 - Moderate Values, Setting Up Precepts;
I-Ching: H1 - Pure Yang, Creative Principle/Heaven, Force, Strong
action, The key, God; Tetra: 36 - Strength]
H852@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 77 (#78); Ego: 76 (#77),
@3: Sup: 6 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 10 (#87),
@4: Sup: 56 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 50 (#137),
Male: #140; Feme: #137
} // #461
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #401 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching:
H44 - Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43
- Encounters;
THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit;
I do not steal the skins of the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
#TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
#POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
#TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
#CANON: #191
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_191@{
@1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
@2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
@4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
Male: #155; Feme: #191
} // #191
#461 as [#1, #400, #10, #50] = 'ath (Aramaic) (H852): {UMBRA: #1 as #401
% #41 = #32} 1) sign, miraculous signs, wonders; 2) 'oth cycle is #6 x
#364 = #2184
"I thought- it good to show the signs {#461 as [#1, #400, #10, #50] =
'ath (Aramaic) (H852): sign} and wonders that the high God hath wrought
toward me." [Daniel 4:2 (KJV)]
"How great are his signs {#461 as [#1, #400, #10, #50] = 'ath (Aramaic)
(H852): sign}! and how mighty are his wonders! his kingdom is an
everlasting kingdom, and his dominion is from generation to generation."
[Daniel 4:3 (KJV)]
"He delivereth and rescueth, and he worketh signs {#461 as [#1, #400,
#10, #50] = 'ath (Aramaic) (H852): sign} and wonders in heaven and in
earth, who hath delivered Daniel {Judgement of God} from the power of
the lions." [Daniel 6:27 (KJV)]
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1785) IDEA @268: SYNTHETIC JUDGMENTS REQUIRE A
PRINCIPLE OTHER THAN THE PRINCIPLE OF #312 - CONTRADICTION: There are
synthetic judgments a posteriori whose origin is empirical; but there
are also synthetic judgments that are a priori certain and that arise
from pure understanding and reason. Both however agree in this, that
they can by no means arise solely from the principle of analysis, namely
the PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN
CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY}; they demand yet a completely different
principle, though they always must be derived from some fundamental
proposition, whichever it may be, in accordance with the PRINCIPLE OF
#312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC
LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY}; for nothing can run counter to this principle,
even though everything cannot be derived from it. I shall first classify
the synthetic judgments.
1. *JUDGMENTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* are always synthetic. For it would be
absurd [IDEA: @268] to base an analytic *JUDGMENT* *ON* *EXPERIENCE*,
since I do not at all need to go beyond my concept in order to formulate
the judgment and therefore have no need for any testimony from
experience. That a body is extended, is a proposition that stands
certain a priori, and *NOT* *A* *JUDGMENT* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*.
For before I go to experience, I have all the conditions for my judgment
already in the concept, from which I merely extract the predicate in
accordance with the principle of contradiction, and by this means can
simultaneously become conscious of the necessity of the judgment, which
experience could never teach me.
2. MATHEMATICAL JUDGMENTS ARE ONE AND ALL SYNTHETIC: This proposition
appears to have completely escaped the observations of analysts of human
reason up to the present, and indeed to be directly opposed to all of
their conjectures, although it is incontrovertibly certain and very
important in its consequences. Because they found that the inferences of
the mathematicians all proceed in accordance with the PRINCIPLE OF #312
- *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL
BLASPHEMY} (which, by nature, is required of any apodeictic certainty
[as clearly established beyond dispute]), they were persuaded that the
fundamental propositions were also known through the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
*CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL
BLASPHEMY}, in which they were very mistaken; for a synthetic
proposition can of course be discerned in accordance with the PRINCIPLE
OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC
LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY}, but only insofar as another synthetic proposition
is presupposed from which the first can be deduced, never however in itself.
First of all it must be observed: that properly mathematical
propositions are always a priori and not empirical judgments, because
they carry necessity with them, which cannot be taken from experience.
But if this will not be granted me, very well, I will restrict my
proposition to pure mathematics, the concept of which already conveys
that it contains not empirical but only pure cognition a priori. One
might well at first think: that the proposition 5 + 7 = 12 {ie.
#5 AS DODECAHEDRON + #7 AS ICOSAHEDRON = #10 AS TETRACTYS
}. Is a purely analytic proposition that follows from the concept of a
sum of seven and five according to the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
*CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL
BLASPHEMY}. However, upon closer inspection, one finds that the concept
of the sum of 5 and 7 contains nothing further than the unification of
the two numbers into one, through which by no means is thought what this
single number may be that combines the two. The concept of twelve is in
no way already thought because I merely think to myself this unification
of seven and five, and I may analyze my concept of such a possible sum
for as long as may be, still I will not meet with twelve therein. One
must go beyond these concepts, in making use of the intuition that
corresponds to one of the two, such as one’s five fingers, or (like
Segner in his arithmetic) five points, and in that manner adding the
units of the five given in intuition step by step to the concept of
seven. One therefore truly amplifies one’s concept through this
proposition 5 + 7 = 12 and adds to the first concept a new one that was
not thought in it; that is, an arithmetical proposition is always
synthetic, which can be seen all the more plainly in the case of
somewhat larger numbers, for it is then clearly evident that, though we
may turn and twist our concept as we like, we could never find the sum
through the mere analysis of our concepts, without making use of intuition.
Nor is any fundamental proposition of pure geometry analytic. That the
straight line between two points is the shortest is a synthetic
proposition. For my concept of the straight contains nothing of
magnitude, but only a quality. The concept of the shortest is therefore
wholly an addition and cannot be extracted by any analysis from the
concept of the straight line. Intuition must therefore be made use of
here, by means of which alone the synthesis is possible.
Some other fundamental propositions that geometers presuppose are indeed
actually analytic and rest on the PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION*
{#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY}; how-
ever, they serve only, like identical propositions, as links in the
chain of method and not as principles: e.g., a = a, the whole is equal
to itself, or (a + b) > a, i.e., the whole is greater than its part. And
indeed even these, al- though they are valid from concepts alone, are
admitted into mathematics only because they can be exhibited in intuition.
It is merely ambiguity of expression which makes us commonly believe
here that the predicate of such apodeictic judgments already lies in our
concept and that the judgment is therefore analytic. Namely, we are
required to add in thought a particular predicate to a given concept,
and this necessity is already attached to the concepts. But the question
is not, what we are required to add in thought to a given concept, but
what we actually think in it, even if only obscurely, and then it
becomes evident that the predicate attaches to such concepts indeed
necessarily, though not immediately, but rather through an intuition
that has to be added.
The essential feature of pure mathematical cognition, differentiating it
from all other a priori cognition, is that it must throughout proceed
not from concepts, but always and only through the construction of
concepts (Critique, p. 713). Because pure mathematical cognition, in its
propositions, must therefore go beyond the concept to that which is
contained in the intuition corresponding to it, its propositions can and
must never arise through the analysis of concepts, i.e., analytically,
and so are one and all synthetic.
I cannot, however, refrain from noting the damage that neglect of this
otherwise seemingly insignificant and unimportant observation has
brought upon philosophy. Hume, when he felt the call, worthy of a
philosopher, to cast his gaze over the entire field of pure a priori
cognition, in which the human understanding claims such vast holdings,
inadvertently lopped off a whole (and indeed the most considerable)
province of the same, *NAMELY* *PURE* *MATHEMATICS*, *BY* *IMAGINING*
*THAT* *THE* *NATURE* {#364 x 3 = #1092 x 2 = #2184 - 24 PRIESTLY
DIVISIONS OF YAHAD / NAZARENE SECT OF APOSTLES: } *AND* *SO* *TO*
*SPEAK* *THE* *LEGAL* *CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *RESTED*
*ON* *COMPLETELY* *DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, *NAMELY* *SOLELY* *ON* *THE*
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN
CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY}:
#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
#273 - *MOMENT*
#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE {*DRIED* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS ON
NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
#728 - REACTANCE +
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}
And although he had by no means made a classification of propositions as
formally and generally, or with the nomenclature, as I have here, it was
nonetheless just as if he had said: Pure mathematics contains only
analytic propositions, but metaphysics contains synthetic propositions a
priori. Now he erred severely in this, and this error had decisively
damaging consequences for his entire conception. For had he not done
this, he would have expanded his question about the origin of our
synthetic judgments far beyond his metaphysical concept of causality and
extended it also to the possibility [IDEA @273] of a priori mathematics;
for he would have had to accept mathematics as synthetic as well. But
then he would by no means have been able to found his metaphysical
propositions on mere experience, for otherwise he would have had to
subject the axioms of pure mathematics to experience as well, which he
was much too reasonable to do.6 The good company in which metaphysics
would then have come to be situated would have secured it against the
danger of scornful mistreatment; for the blows that were intended for
the latter would have had to strike the former as well, which was not
his intention, and could not have been; and so the acute man would have
been drawn into reflections which must have been similar to those with
which we are now occupied, but which would have gained infinitely from
his inimitably fine presentation.
"MY AGE SAVES ME FROM THE SUSPICION THAT I AM PERHAPS PLEADING #321 -
*PRO* *DOMO* {ie. as (G156): being (logical) reason (motive, matter),
(legal) crime (alleged or proved)
[1, {@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1)}
10, {@2: Sup: 11 (#12); Ego: 10 (#11)}
300, {@3: Sup: 68 (#80); Ego: 57 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH
THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42})}
9, {@4: Sup: 77 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 9 (#77)}
1] {@5: Sup: 78 (#235); Ego: 1 (#78)}
*PRO* *DOMO* MEANING *FOR* *HIS* *OWN* *CAUSE* is a relative value term
of SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE PRINCIPLE and this notion is not
contradictory to the fact that clergy theorists have subjected Western
society to very heavy exogamous constraints and to a marked (largely
*PRO* *DOMO*) *VALORIZATION* OF *CELIBACY* [Joseph Morsel ( with the
collaboration of Christine Ducourtieux), The History (of the Middle
Ages) is a #444 - *SPORT* OF COMBAT ... Reflections on the aims of the
History of the Middle Ages intended for a society in which even the
students of history's question, 2007]
WHICH MIGHT REASONABLY AND PREDICTABLY BE CONSIDERED THAT *PRO* *DOMO*)
*VALORIZATION* OF *CELIBACY* IS PERVERSE AND DELIBERATE SEDITION {#444 -
*SPORT* OF COMBAT} BY LACK OF ADHERENCE TO THE AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF
COHESION {
@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 - MARRYING
MAIDEN: #3 + #6 = #9 as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE
} AGAINST BOTH THE PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION {
@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29
OCTOBER 1900: #27 + #54 = #81
} AND PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY {
@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT
29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18 = #27
} in regard to the SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY AND THE PROBITY OF JUDGES
WITHIN AUSTRALIA AS TO WHY ONE CANNOT GET ANY CONSIDERATION OF JUSTICE
FOR ADHERING TO THESE TRANSCENDENT PRINCIPLES WHICH ALL INHABITANTS MUST
ADHERE *TO* *AS* FIRST PRINCIPLES OF EXISTENCE AS THAT WHICH OUGHT TO
PROCEED BEFORE EVERYONE ELSE *AND* *ESPECIALLY* *BY* *OUR* *JUDICIAL*
*SYSTEM* WHOM UNDER SECTION III the "GOVERNOR GENERAL MAY CONSTITUTE AND
APPOINT, IN OUR NAME AND ON OUR BEHALF, ALL SUCH JUDGES, COMMISSIONERS,
JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, AND OTHER NECESSARY OFFICERS AND MINISTERS OF OUR
SAID COMMONWEALTH, AS MAY BE *LAWFULLY* *CONSTITUTED* OR APPOINTED BY
US" IN ACCORD WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {
@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE
TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY
WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) — RATIONAL PI AS TIME
DIVISIONS BY JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293 TROPICAL YEARS:
365.242321; WEEKS; DAYS: #6 x #364 = #2184: #1 + #2 + #3 = #6}.
The Latin *PRO* *DOMO* *SUA* ("for his house") is derived from a speech
of Cicero, pronounced in 57 BCE, before the *PONTIFFS* to obtain the
restitution of his property confiscated by the tribune Clodius, during
his condemnation to the exile.
[140] It was then reported to you, O priests, and after that it became a
common topic of conversation, how he, with preposterous language with
ill-omened auspices, at times interrupting himself, doubting, fearing,
hesitating, pronounced and did everything in a manner wholly different
from that which you have recorded as proper in your books. It is,
indeed, not very strange that in doing an act of such wickedness and
such insanity, even his audacity could not wholly repress his fear.
In truth, if no *ROBBER* was ever so savage and inhuman, as, when he had
plundered temples, and then, having been excited by dreams or some
superstitious feelings, consecrated some altar on a desert shore, not to
shudder in his mind when compelled to propitiate with his prayers the
deity whom he has insulted by his wickedness; what do you suppose must
have been the agitation of mind of that plunderer of every temple, and
of every house, and of the whole city, when he was consecrating one
single altar to avert the vengeance due to his numberless acts of
wickedness? [141] He could not possibly (although the insolence of power
had elated his mind, and although he was armed by nature with incredible
audacity) fail to blunder in his proceedings, or to keep constantly
making mistakes, especially when he had a priest and teacher who was
compelled to teach before he had learnt himself. There is great power,
not only in the divinity of the immortal gods, but also in the republic
itself. When the immortal gods saw the guardian and protector of their
temples driven away in a most wicked manner, they were unwilling to quit
their temples and to remove into his house. Therefore they alarmed the
mind of that most insensible man with fear and anxiety. But the
republic, although that was banished at the same time with myself, was
still constantly present to the eyes of its destroyer, and from his
excited and kindled frenzy was constantly demanding my restoration and
its own. What marvel then is it, if he, urged on by the insanity of fear
and drawn on headlong by wickedness, was neither able properly to
perform the ceremonies which he had begun, nor to utter one single word
in due order with proper solemnity? [THE ORATIONS OF MARCUS TULLIUS
CICERO, LITERALLY TRANSLATED BY C. D. YONGE, B. A. LONDON. GEORGE BELL &
SONS, YORK STREET, COVENT GARDEN. 1891]
AS CONVEYING A PRO [#391 v's #541 --> CONTEMN / CONDEMN] DOMO [cf: ADOLF
HITLER'S TABLE TALK (1941-1944) IDEA @215 ON 12 MAY 1942] IMPETUS: *FOR*
(*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the interests of a
given perspective or for the benefit of any small powerful or
influential #123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION / FIELD / CLIQUE
which places a prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the
pious construct {#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - UMBRA
ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL / *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE*
*MORNING*} by conduct of #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE.
H7750@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 63 (#69); Ego: 57 (#63),
@3: Sup: 72 (#141); Ego: 9 (#72),
@4: Sup: 1 (#142); Ego: 10 (#82),
Male: #142; Feme: #82
} // #325
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #315 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;
THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.
#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150
#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#6, #300, #9, #10] = suwt (H7750):
{UMBRA: #9 as #315 % #41 = #28} 1) to swerve, fall away; 2) *TO*
*THRUST* *OR* *FORCE* *DOWN*, *OUT*, *OR* *AWAY*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
swerve, fall away; 1a2) those falling away (participle); 2a) subject to
censorship or kill-file filtering; 2b) habitually exclude socially or
ignore conversationally;
<— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF AN
AGREEMENT OF POLITICAL INTERFERENCE / DOMESTIC TERRORISM BY
INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVE CAPABLE OF DEPLOYING THE LEST WE FORGET ODE FOR
ITS OWN ENDS
THUS WE CONVEY A COGNITIVE PROCESS DEPLOYING DIALECTIC WHICH IS CAPABLE
OF CONVEYING IDEAS WHILST DERIVED FROM SUCH AS PARENT-CHILD HAVE NO
INHERENT GEMATRIA CORRESPONDENCE AND THEREFORE EXHIBIT A HIGHER LEVEL OF
CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH THEN HAS INTEGRITY WITH THE EVOLUTIONARY PEER
EQUIVALENT CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING
THEREFORE THE INTERDICTION: “GOD SAVE THE QUEEN FROM YOU FASCISTS” given
the impunity against the DIGNITY ROYAL as an OAK TREE PLANTING upon 27
OCTOBER 1934 BY HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS PRINCE HENRY DUKE OF GLOUCESTER
expressed as *CARPE* *DIEM* upon the SATURDAY of 28 OCTOBER 2017 at a
distance of some 40 to 60 metres within the street to passing persons
whom paused and laughed with absolute conviction as derision by means of
#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE MORE PROPERLY DEFINED AS A
CONTEMPT BY MALFEASANCE.
G3622@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 80 (#150); Ego: 10 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#169); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 8 (#177); Ego: 70 (#170),
@5: Sup: 58 (#235 - ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @235 ON 7 JUNE
1942 AS SHOOTING ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY OF THESE SELF-STYLED BIBLE
STUDENTS (BIBELFORSCHER}); Ego: 50 (#220),
@6: Sup: 47 (#282); Ego: 70 (#290),
@7: Sup: 6 (#288 - UMBRA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS) / BEERSHEBA
/ ANTI-SEMITISM); Ego: 40 (#330), <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* /
*ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360
@8: Sup: 16 (#304); Ego: 10 (#340),
@9: Sup: 17 (#321 as *PRO* *DOMO* (G156): BEING (LOGICAL) REASON
(MOTIVE, MATTER), (LEGAL) CRIME (ALLEGED OR PROVED)); Ego: 1 (#341 -
*TO* *PUT* *A* *NAME* *UPON*, *NAME*),
@10: Sup: 67 (#388); Ego: 50 (#391),
Male: #388; Feme: #391
} // #391
#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#11 as #341 % #41 = #13} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
dispensation;
#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460 %
#41 = #9} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling; 1b)
like: ie. corresponding to a thing;
#541 as [#5, #80, #10, #200, #20, #10, #1, #200, #5, #10] = episkiazo
(G1982): {#55 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *TO* *THROW* *A* *SHADOW* *UPON*,
*TO* *ENVELOP* *IN* *A* *SHADOW*, *TO* *OVERSHADOW* from a vaporous
cloud that casts a shadow the word is transferred to a shining cloud
surrounding and enveloping persons with brightness. Used of the Holy
Spirit exerting creative energy upon the womb of the virgin Mary and
impregnating it (a use of the word which seems to have been drawn from
the familiar Old Testament idea of a cloud as symbolising the immediate
presence and power of God);
#541 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #200] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#56 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
dispensation;
}, AND SO I AM ABLE TO INVITE ATTENTION TO THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROBLEM.
I SHALL HAVE NO PEACE OF MIND UNTIL I HAVE SUCCEEDED IN PLANTING A SEED
OF NORDIC BLOOD WHEREVER THE POPULATION STAND IN NEED OF
*REGENERATION*." [ADOLF HITLER'S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK AS IDEA: @215
ON 12th MAY 1942 / PAGE: #475]
3. PROPERLY METAPHYSICAL JUDGMENTS ARE ONE AND ALL SYNTHETIC: Judgments
belonging to metaphysics must be distinguished from properly meta-
physical judgments. Very many among the former are analytic, but they
merely provide the means to metaphysical judgments, toward which the aim
of the science is completely directed, and which are always synthetic.
For if concepts belong to metaphysics, e.g., that of substance, then the
judgments arising from their mere analysis necessarily belong to
metaphysics as well, e.g., substance is that which exists only as
subject, etc., and through several such analytic judgments we try to
approach the definition of those concepts. Since, however, the analysis
of a pure concept of the understanding (such as metaphysics contains)
does not proceed in a different manner from the analysis of any other,
even empirical, concept which does not belong to metaphysics (e.g., air
is an elastic fluid, the elasticity of which is not lost with any known
degree of cold), therefore the concept may indeed be properly
metaphysical, but not the analytic judgment; for this science possesses
something special and proper to it in the generation of its a priori
cognitions, which generation must therefore be distinguished from what
this science has in common with all other cognitions of the
understanding; thus, e.g., the proposition: All that is substance in
things persists, is a synthetic and properly metaphysical proposition {
THAT THE FIRST OBSERVATION IS UPON THIS #41 - *ONTIC* necessity which is
associated to IDEA: @329 that gives us a notion on temporality being the
beginning of the new year 1 JANUARY which commenced with the Gregorian
calendar reforms
#41 - IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH METAPHYSICS AS A SCIENCE, A CLEAR
DISTINCTION MUST BE MADE BETWEEN THE CATEGORIES (PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING) AND THE IDEAS (PURE CONCEPTS OF REASON) {IDEA: @329}.
}. If one has previously assembled, according to fixed principles, the a
priori concepts that constitute the matter of metaphysics and its
building material, then the analysis of these concepts is of great
value; it can even be presented separately from all the synthetic
propositions that constitute [IDEA: @274] metaphysics itself, as a
special part (as it were as PHILOSOPHIA DEFINITIVA) containing nothing
but analytic propositions belonging to metaphysics.
For in fact such analyses do not have much use anywhere except in
metaphysics, that is, with a view toward the synthetic propositions that
are to be generated from such previously analyzed concepts.
The conclusion of this section is therefore: that metaphysics properly
has to do with synthetic propositions a priori, and these alone
constitute its aim, for which it indeed requires many analyses of its
concepts (therefore many analytic judgments), in which analyses, though,
the procedure is no different from that in any other type of cognition
when one seeks simply to make its concepts clear through analysis. But
the generation of cognition a priori in accordance with both intuition
and concepts, ultimately of synthetic propositions a priori as well, and
specifically in philosophical cognition, forms the essential content of
metaphysics. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @268 TO @274]
— TIME DIDN'T DENY —
“YE BE NOT
FORGOTTEN.
AS THEY *ROT* {ie. US corruption on the part of officials}.
SOIL SODDEN.
WE REMEMBER.
OF VALOUR BORN.
FAITHFUL FOREVER.
ER EVE NOR MORN.”
[ANZAC Centennial 25 April 2018]
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Time%20Didn't%20Deny%2020180425.pdf>
Nous: #59
Time:
Date: 2018.12.31
Torah: [#4, #40, #2]@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 44 (#48); Ego: 40 (#44),
@3: Sup: 46 (#94); Ego: 2 (#46),
Male: #94; Feme: #46
} // #46
Dao: A Sensible Guide, Hold Fast To Reason
Tetra: #13 - Increase
I-Ching: H42 - Increase, Augmenting
Latin: Liberator {God fountain of wisdom} Alt: Hahehel {Three-fold Plan
of God} {
1. AIDS AGAINST SORCERY & TO OBTAIN WISDOM
2. THE WATERS
3. SAILORS, FISHERMAN, NAVAL CONSTRUCTION ETC
4. Ptebiou
}
Solar Eclipse: 25 November 2030 (GMT?)
#369 CE
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#341 / #444} / HETEROS {#346 / #406} / TORAH {#384
/ #425}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:5,row:7,col:2,nous:59&idea:{m,241}&idea:{f,316}&idea:{m,341}&idea:{f,444}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 5, row: 7, col: 2, nous: 59 [Date: 2018.12.31, Super:
#341 / #73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 - Climbing,
Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent, Ego: #444 / #59 - A
Sensible Guide, Hold Fast To Reason; I-Ching: H42 - Increase,
Augmenting; Tetra: 13 - Increase]
#341 / #444 - 31 DECEMBER v's #329 - 1 JANUARY
SPECIFICALLY BY PREJUDICED ROMAN CATHOLICS AS REPRESENTATIVES WITHIN
SUCH PUBLIC AUTHORITIES WHOM HAVE PARTAKEN OF THE EUCHARIST COMMUNION IN
CONJUNCTION TO WEDDING VOWS AS THAT WHICH ARE RELIANT upon a context
sourced from a composite of ADOLF HILTER'S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK as a
particular rhetorical device common enough to have its own name,
*REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* conveying significant temporal associations
together with a hierarchy of CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING as
HOW-TO-DO-IT-YOURSELF manual that appears upon provisional analysis, to
be cognisant of both IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE
METAPHYSICS (1783) and the PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL *SOVEREIGN* / *MARRIAGE*
*DYNAMIC* nomenclature as consideration upon binary NUMBER and RELIGIOUS
/ STATE ECONOMY, thereby they are defined as *MITHRAS* {ie. @1 / @5, #15
(#260) ... #369 (#15)} within origins *AND* *NOT* *OSTENSIBLY* *JEWISH*
/ *CHRISTIAN* {ie. a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC* x
n] NECESSITY WITH IT” which implies a TRINOMIAL worldview} as the
premise for our AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH'S alternative historical
development of its perennialist understanding of #492 - AUTONOMOUS FREE
WILL / #390 - SOVEREIGNTY DYNAMIC BY #391 - HOMOGENEOUS REGARD FOR #902
- RULE OF LAW ...
#41 - KANT'S ONTIC PERSPECTIVE OBJECTIVE: IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH
METAPHYSICS AS A SCIENCE, A CLEAR DISTINCTION MUST BE MADE BETWEEN THE
CATEGORIES (PURE CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING) AND THE IDEAS (PURE
CONCEPTS OF REASON) {IDEA: @329}.
HERE'S WHY AUSTRALIA'S PARLIAMENT USES SANDGLASSES WHEN THERE'S A
DIVISION IN THE HOUSE:
“Australia’s parliamentary traditions and conventions change over time.
For example, when a vote (or ‘division’) {
#371 as [#8, #80, #5, #10, #9, #8, #200, #1, #50] = apeitheo (G544):
{#10 as #910} 1) not to allow one's self to be persuaded; 2) not to
comply with; 1a) to refuse or withhold belief; 1b) to refuse belief and
obedience;
} is called, senators have four minutes to get to the chamber {
#371 as [#30, #40, #100, #200, #1] = miqra' (H4744): {#4 as #341} 1)
convocation, convoking, reading, a calling together; 1a) convocation,
*sacred* *assembly*; 1b) convoking; 1c) reading; / [#6, #70, #90, #200,
#5] = `atsarah (H6116): {#5 as #365} 1) assembly, solemn assembly; 1a)
assembly (sacred or festive meeting); 1b) assemblage, company, group}.
Back in 1975 that increased from two minutes to three, when a new
extension to Old Parliament House made the journey {
#371 as [#6, #10, #200, #40, #60, #50, #5] = ramac (H7429): {#8 as #300}
1) to trample; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to trample; 1a2) trampler (participle);
1b) (Niphal) to be trampled;
} from committee rooms to the chamber a little longer. The current
four-minute limit was introduced in 1988, when Australian democracy
moved up the hill to to the much bigger, current Parliament House.
YOUTUBE: "Hymn For The Weekend (Coldplay)"
http://youtu.be/YykjpeuMNEk
#341 as [#5, #80, #70, #50, #70, #40, #1, #7, #8, #10] = eponomazo
(G2028): {UMBRA: #13 as #1123 % #41 = #16} 1) *TO* *PUT* *A* *NAME*
*UPON*, *NAME*; 2) *TO* *BE* *NAMED*;
EVIDENCE OF TARGETING: #1123 as [#300, #2, #400, #6, #400, #10, #5] /
#707 as [#5, #300, #2, #400] = shabbath (H7676): {UMBRA: #6 as #707 %
#41 = #10} 1) *SABBATH*; 1a) sabbath; 1b) day of atonement; 1c) sabbath
year; 1d) week; 1e) produce (in sabbath year);
#1123 as [#5, #400, #300, #8, #10, #400] / #729 as [#5, #300, #8, #10,
#400, #6] = shachath (H7843): {UMBRA: #3 as #729 % #41 = #32} 1) to
destroy, corrupt, go to ruin, decay; 1a) (Niphal) to be marred, be
spoiled, be corrupted, be corrupt, be injured, be ruined, be *ROTTED*;
1b) (Piel); 1b1) to spoil, ruin; 1b2) *TO* *PERVERT*, *CORRUPT*, *DEAL*
*CORRUPTLY* (*MORALLY*); 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to spoil, ruin, destroy;
1c2) to pervert, corrupt (morally); 1c3) destroyer (participle); 1d)
(Hophal) spoiled, ruined (participle);
#1123 as [#3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10, #800, #50] / #553 as [#3, #5, #50,
#5, #200, #10, #70, #10, #200] = genesia (G1077): {UMBRA: #22 as #553 %
#41 = #20} 1) *A* *BIRTHDAY* *CELEBRATION*, a birthday feast; 1a) the
earlier Greeks used this word of funeral commemorations, a festival
commemorative of a deceased friend;
#341 as [#5, #300, #1, #30, #5] = she'elah (H7596): {UMBRA: #9 as #336 %
#41 = #8} 1) request, thing asked for, demand; 1a) *REQUEST*,
*PETITION*; 1b) thing asked for;
#341 as [#40, #5, #40, #6, #200, #10, #40] = yarah (H3384): {UMBRA: #1
as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) to throw, shoot, cast, pour; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
throw, cast; 1a2) to cast, lay, set; 1a3) to shoot arrows; 1a4) to throw
water, rain; 1b) (Niphal) *TO* *BE* *SHOT*; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to throw,
cast; 1c2) to shoot; 1c3) *TO* *POINT* *OUT*, *SHOW*; 1c4) to direct,
teach, instruct; 1c5) to throw water, *rain*;
#341 as [#1, #60, #10, #70, #200] = axios (G514): {UMBRA: #11 as #341 %
#41 = #13} 1) *WEIGHING*, *HAVING* *WEIGHT*, having the weight of
another thing of like value, worth as much; 2) *BEFITTING*, *CONGRUOUS*,
*CORRESPONDING* *TO* *A* *THING*; 3) *OF* *ONE* *WHO* *HAS* *MERITED*
*ANYTHING* WORTHY*; 3a) *BOTH* *IN* *A* *GOOD* *AND* *A* *BAD* *SENSE*;
YOUTUBE: " A Sky Full Of Stars (Coldplay)"
http://youtu.be/VPRjCeoBqrI
NICK MILLER (SYDNEY MORNING HERALD) @ 2332 HOURS ON 11 NOVEMBER 2018:
"NATIONALISM IS A BETRAYAL OF PATRIOTISM: FRANCE'S PRESIDENT LECTURES
THE POWERFUL: (PARIS) By the grave of an unknown soldier, under
Napoleon’s grand arch, at the centenary of the end of a great, terrible
war, France’s president lectured the powerful.
The first world war’s lesson and legacy were clear, he said. Peace is
hard won and is fragile.
A century ago, after such loss, the world took a path of humiliation and
revenge and it fuelled the rise of nationalism and totalitarianism.
His audience, metres away, included presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir
Putin, and Recep Erdogan.
*NATIONALISM* *IS* *A* *BETRAYAL* *OF* *PATRIOTISM*, Emmanuel Macron
declared. A withdrawal into isolationism would be “a grave error that
future generations would very rightly make us responsible for”.
“The old demons are rising again, ready to wreak chaos and death,” he
warned. “History sometimes threatens to take its sinister course again.”
He wanted the 70 world leaders assembled there - including Australian
Governor-General Peter Cosgrove, seated just next to Putin - to renew a
pledge to honour the dead and “place peace above all else”.
Trump listened, leaning forward, his eyes narrow. He was one of the last
to applaud as the speech ended.
— TRUMP CANCELS WW1 MEMORIAL AT U.S. CEMETERY IN FRANCE DUE TO RAIN
— ALL HAIL THE POTUS —
[Written 1124 hours (AEDT) 11 November 2018]
“WITH TRUMP YOU KNOW.
IT’S EITHER FIRE OR FURY.
OR WATER LOGGED.
THE WIND DOTH BLOW.
YET SOIL MAKES MERRY.
BY FIELDS LEFT UNTROD.”
Just a few weeks ago, at a rally in Texas, he had said “*YOU* *KNOW*
*WHAT* *I* *AM*? *I’M* *A* *NATIONALIST*. *OK*? *I’M* *A*
*NATIONALIST*…. *USE* *THAT* *WORD*. *USE* *THAT* *WORD*”.
REMEMBRANCE DAY 2018@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 34 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 29 (#109),
@3: Sup: 8 (#92); Ego: 38 (#147),
@4: Sup: 5 (#97); Ego: 6 (#153),
@5: Sup: 33 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 20 (#173 - I
AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
@6: Sup: 14 (#144); Ego: 8 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
@7: Sup: 67 (#211); Ego: 19 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
Male: #211; Feme: #200
}
#211 as [#10, #200, #1] = yare' (H3372): {UMBRA: #5 as #211 % #41 = #6}
1) to fear, revere, be afraid; 2) (TWOT) to shoot, pour; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to fear, be afraid; 1a2) to stand in awe of, be awed; 1a3) to fear,
reverence, honour, respect; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be fearful, be
dreadful, be feared; 1b2) *to* *cause* *astonishment* *and* *awe*, *be*
*held* *in* *awe*; 1b3) to inspire reverence or godly fear or awe; 1c)
(Piel) *to* *make* *afraid*, *terrify*;
#200 as [#40, #70, #40, #10, #40] = `am (H5971): {UMBRA: #10 as #110 %
#41 = #28} 1) nation, people; 2) kinsman, kindred; 1a) *people*,
*nation*; 1b) *persons*, *members* *of* *one's* *people*, *compatriots*,
*country*-*men*;
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/FRENCH%20CONCRETE%20ALLIANCE%2020181112.PNG>
[IMAGE: French Concrete Alliance 12 November 2018]
Such terms as “concrete” are symbolic aspirations which like völkisch /
jingoism / confederate have no essentiality of continuity within our
REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY 2018 CENTENNIAL #288 - MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS.
Just because this day fell on a #365 - SUNDAY doesn’t bestow upon a
cabal of maggots any dignity of holy purpose by opportunity of being
there — fidelity to duty, virtue of action, nobility of cause and
DIGNITY ROYAL are ordained by the Almighty.
— MAGGOTY MEAT —
[Written 0900 hours on 28 December 2017]
"BIRDS OF A FEATHER.
OH THOU DARK RAVEN.
HOW'S THE WEATHER?
IN YOUR DANK COVEN.
NOW UPON YOU TETHER.
N'ER ETERNAL HEAVEN."
YOUTUBE: "Imagine Dragons (Thunder)"
http://youtu.be/fKopy74weus
If objects of intention such as #390 - WREATHS are no longer there then
such cause is #312 - WITHERED / DRIED and has no orchestral procession
by which good intentions are TROD and all that is left is a cacophony of
malcontent and impish malefaction which cleaves for eternity upon its
bestowed as a pall that is witnessed by all.
WHAT IS A TROD?
A Trod in the west of England is a straight line or fairy path in the
grass of a field with a different shade of green from the rest. Great
danger was associated with using these paths when a supernatural
procession was using them. Fairy rings have certain elements in common
with this phenomenon. People with rheumatism {ANAGRAM: Mithraeums as
*Mithraism*} sought relief by walking along these paths; however animals
were thought to actively avoid them.
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trod>]
Macron did use that word, and he used the weight of the war dead to
argue for multilateralism, internationalism, for groups that spanned
borders such as the European Union and the United Nations.
“Let us add our hopes together instead of seeing our fears oppose each
other,” he said, appealing for global unity in the fight against global
warming, poverty, hunger, *INEQUALITY* and *IGNORANCE*.
[<https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe/nationalism-is-a-betrayal-of-patriotism-france-s-president-lectures-the-powerful-20181111-p50fes.html>]
JAMES MORRIS, OLIVIA TOBIN (EVENING STANDARD) @ 2221 HOURS (UTC) ON 23
OCTOBER 2018: "QUEEN SPEAKS PUBLICLY ON BREXIT FOR FIRST TIME DURING
DUTCH ROYAL VISIT: During a state banquet for the King of the
Netherlands and his wife Queen Maxima, she said that "AS WE LOOK TOWARD
A NEW PARTNERSHIP WITH EUROPE", the values shared by the UK and Holland
"ARE OUR GREATEST ASSETS".
In front of a watching Theresa May at Buckingham Palace, the Queen added
that as "INNOVATORS, TRADERS AND INTERNATIONALISTS WE LOOK WITH
CONFIDENCE TO THE FUTURE".
The Queen, who is impartial in political matters, chose to emphasise the
qualities needed by the UK and one of its closet European neighbours
going forward - as UK politicians continue to be bitterly divided by BREXIT.
Earlier, in a speech to both Houses of Parliament, King Willem-Alexander
urged the government to lift the "*SHADOW* *OF* *UNCERTAINTY*" hanging
over Dutch nationals living in Britain after BREXIT.
H5645@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 72 (#142); Ego: 2 (#72),
@3: Sup: 78 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 6 (#78),
@4: Sup: 73 (#293); Ego: 76 (#154),
Male: #293; Feme: #154
} // #478
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #72 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32
- Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;
THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *INCONSTANT* *MIND*.
#VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
#TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
#POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of profit.
#TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
#CANON: #186
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
@1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
@2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
@3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186
#478 as [#70, #2, #6, #400] = `ab (H5645): {UMBRA: #12 as #72 % #41 =
#31} 1) *DARKNESS*, *CLOUD*, *THICKET*; 1a) dark cloud; 1b) cloud mass;
1c) thicket (as refuge);
And in his address at the Palace dinner, with Ms May seated nearby, the
foreign head of state continued: "AT PRESENT, A LOT OF ATTENTION IS
FOCUSED ON THE 'TECHNICAL' SIDE OF BREXIT. THAT'S UNDERSTANDABLE AND
NECESSARY.
BUT IN THE MIDST OF ALL THAT COMPLEXITY WE SHOULD NOT LOSE SIGHT OF THE
GREATER NARRATIVE THAT CONTINUES TO BIND {#41 x 7 = #287 as [#1, #50,
#1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios (G316): {UMBRA: #9 as #356 %
#41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without, indispensable;
1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what ought according
to the law of duty be done, what is required by the circumstances} US.
THE GREATER NARRATIVE OF FREEDOM, OPENNESS AND COOPERATION. OF GROWTH
AND A PROSPERITY WHOSE FRUITS ARE ENJOYED BY ALL."
[<https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/queen-speaks-publicly-on-brexit-for-first-time-during-dutch-royal-visit-a3969811.html>]
— BLINKERED DEVOTIONS —
“IF I KNOW GOOD.
AND I KNOW EVIL.
BE IT UNDERSTOOD.
I AIN’T NO DEVIL.
WELL KISS MY RING.
YOU *ROTTEN* SOD.
‘N MOUTH MY DING.
YOU AIN’T NO GOD.”
YOUTUBE: "Something Just Like This (The Chainsmokers & Coldplay)"
http://youtu.be/FM7MFYoylVs
What advice then or as counsel of the church (consilia evangelica) would
they give on various *MORAL* issues as their claim to a higher obedience
than the natural law (ie. on the basis of Pythagorean HETEROS THEORY OF
NUMBER) which is required by others who follow the counsels to perform
acts of merit and who are thereby given a *GREATER* certainty of
salvation than those who merely follow the commands of the law. And
what then is the character of the forma corporis of your archetypal son
of man {ie. HEAVEN (H27) EARTH (H9) = MAN (H36) as #666} in relation to
your representations (conscientia erronea: erring conscience of the
reprobate *MIND* which misidentifies the good) as improper claims made
of Jesus {He is saved/A saviour; a deliverer} of Nazareth {Sovereign;
one chosen or set apart; separated; crowned; sanctified}, in being then
the full embodiment of this Divine *MIND* as an AUTONOMY OF WILL?
As to what constitutes the substantial form (forma substantialis) of the
formal cause (causa formalis) as to the quintessential first material
(materia prima: Anthropic Cosmological Principle as the absolute
generalized basis of all subsequent individualization that is utterly
potential and is devoid of all attributes or qualities) which is then
the *MIND* as intellectualised universal form (universalia forma), idea,
shape or pattern of the essential or natural image of God (imago Dei
essentialis sive naturalis: that archetypal principal perfections of
righteousness, holiness and wisdom as the likeness or resemblance to God
in which man was originally created).
Which then results in the second matter (materia secunda) as the basis
for all material existence (essentia: indicates the entire whatness of a
thing including the materiality or spirituality as its substantia) as
the integrity and authenticity of being within the world and living in
compliance (status integritatis) as obedience with the terms of the
innate *MORAL* (lex moralis primordialis:
7: {
5: {1: {zen: 8, row: 7, col: 5}, nous: [1]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE
***@zen: 4, row: 7, col: 9, nous: 15 [Date: 2018.12.25, Time: 1816
hrs, Super: #359 / #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy, Ego: #397 / #15 -
Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner
Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning; Tetra: 1 - Centre]
7: {48: {zen: 8, row: 7, col: 7}, nous: [48]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE
***@zen: 4, row: 3, col: 1, nous: 67 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #408 / #63 - Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings; I-Ching:
H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder); Tetra:
62 - Doubt, Ego: #279 / #67 - Three Treasures; I-Ching: H10 - Treading
(conduct), Tread Carefully, Continuing; Tetra: 48 - Ritual]
},
8: {
4: {49: {zen: 8, row: 8, col: 4}, nous: [49]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE
***@zen: 4, row: 4, col: 3, nous: 18 [Date: 2018.7.26, Time: 0805
hrs, Super: #395 / #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching:
H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance;
Tetra: 33 - Closeness, Ego: #421 / #18 - Origin of Ethical Concepts,
Palliation of Vulgarity; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat,
Yielding; Tetra: 49 - Flight]
9: {24: {zen: 8, row: 8, col: 9}, nous: [24]} // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE
***@zen: 4, row: 1, col: 5, nous: 1 [Date: 2018.4.3, Time: 0055
hrs, Super: #516 / #76 - Strength's Warning Signs, Revealers of Virtue;
I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 64 -
Sinking, Ego: #331 / #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy]
},
9: {
6: {25: {zen: 8, row: 9, col: 6}, nous: [25]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE
***@zen: 4, row: 1, col: 6, nous: 12 [Date: 2018.4.8, Time: 0115
hrs, Super: #427 / #81 - Propounding the Essential; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 15 - Reach, Ego: #366 / #12 -
Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining from Desire; I-Ching: H6
- Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra: 25 - Contention]
8: {72: {zen: 8, row: 9, col: 8}, nous: [72]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE
***@zen: 4, row: 6, col: 8, nous: 75 [Date: 2018.11.11 *AS*
*REMEMBRANCE* / *ARMISTICE* *DAY*, Time: 1515 hrs, Super: #367 / #76 -
Strength's Warning Signs, Revealers of Virtue; I-Ching: H20 - Viewing,
Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 64 - Sinking, Ego: #352 / #75 -
Destructive Envy, Harmed Through Greed; I-Ching: H52 - Restraint,
Inaction, Bound, Keeping still, mountain, Stilling; Tetra: 72 - Hardness]
}
Which as a habit and capacity of will by its exercise of intellect as
being primarily intentioned to be regulated by the innate understanding
which grasps the basic principles of the *MORAL* law and spontaneously
acts according to the dictates as wants and desires of conscientia) and
the natural law (ie. the universal *MORAL* law either impresses by God
upon the *MIND* of all the people or immediately discerned by the reason
in its encounter with the order of nature) as a covenant of nature
(foedus naturae: predicated on the original integrity of human nature
and its capacity for obedience under the terms if the innate *MORAL* or
natural law) bestowed upon us by the graciousness of God.
I clearly do metaphysics and metempirical philosophy (perennialist
school of thought) and have an alternate gender identity and sexual
dynamic paradigm of MIND, BODY and SOUL captivation which is
historically associated with the HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER as being an
encapsulated microcosm as metempirical (ie. the branch of philosophy
that deals with things existing beyond the realm of experience)
philosophy as the perennialist school of thought or that of metaphysical
(ie. of things transcending what is physical or natural and the temporal
reality) dynamic perpetuated against the human psyche.
I have defined the complexities of this opposition from the perspective,
as being a composite lack of any sapient thought to any real depth,
conduct as repetitive use of idioms as mantras of opposition fixed by
symbolic associations to obsolete mathematical paradigms of *MIND* and
the re-packaging as thoughts of others which is then traditionally
characteristic of a skepticism, and narcissism as nihilism, in having
only a sensual consequence as its own defied claim to any reality.
In that, they deploy language as denial and which has its throne within
the basal realm of consciousness relating to the seat of its impulsive
desire, action as a lack of motion towards freedom from any accountability.
A habitual action of anal extrusion exhibiting an infantile psychosexual
developmental stage in which thinking and language is nothing more than
an act of defecation as the major source of sensuous pleasure where the
anus forms the *CENTRE* of self-awareness.
Although this is universally and historical declared a common good in
expressing a ’natural biological order reality’ as the basis for the
Institutional religo-political worldview as the sovereign/marriage
dynamic being the Natural / Common Law acceptance imperative as the
cultivating artifice (ie. NOT STRAIGHT OR DIRECT, AS A COURSE;
INDIRECTLY STATED OR EXPRESSED; NOT STRAIGHTFORWARD; INDIRECTLY AIMED AT
OR REACHED, AS ENDS OR RESULTS; DEVIOUSLY ACHIEVED) of the inner female
within conjugal slavitude as domesticated goddess and whilst the
emancipated male ran victorious as conquistadors within the phenomenal
realm and conquering through-out all the world.
— STRAWBERRIES —
"CALIGULA'S ARMY MARCHES, {#1}
ALL ACROSS THE LAND. {#2}
THE TRIUMPHANT ARCHES. {#3}
WITH BASKETS IN HAND. {#4}
LIKE A LITTLE SMURF, {#5}
THEY'RE HARD TO FIND. {#6}
FROM MOUNT TO SURF. {#7}
IT'S SUCH A GRIND. {#8}
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. {#9}
TIME IS MONEY. {#10}
IT'S OFF TO TRUMP TOWER. {#11}
TRY NOT TO BE FUNNY. {#12}
SPIT THE DUMMY. {#13}
SO MUCH TO COUNT. {#14}
PEE A PENNY. {#15}
MORE TO MOUNT." {#16}
YOUTUBE: "Coldplay - Viva La Vida"
http://youtu.be/dvgZkm1xWPE
In the history analytical philosophy the prevailing interpretation of
the meaning of the terms such as 'BEING' or 'EXISTENCE' are as
UNIVERSALS usually defined by NUMBER and specifically the Pythagorean
HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER and were affirmed with different meanings,
respectively equivalent to being in space and time (ie. MY INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY as a universal statement which is a singularity compliant with
a DIVINE FIAT and potentiality as a cosmological / language
consideration of the chronological circumscribing given to the 10
commandments as then defining human consciousness by a cosmological
anthropic principle) and being not in space and time (ie. MY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY as encapsulated by the knowledge of a ternary
HOMOIOS rather than the binary HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER consideration).
That accordingly such establishes my distinctive INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
RIGHTS from that of ROMAN (HETEROS) EMPIRE GOVERNANCE and JUDAISM'S
TORAH CONNECTION TO IT.
That you have fired your cannon, missed the mark and there is no
contingency or exit plan since that time is passed.
- dolf
Initial Post: 15 December 2018
Post by Hail Trump! Hail Our People!London homicides now highest annual rate for a decade
theguardian.com
Wednesday, December 12, 2018
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/dec/12/london-homicides-now-highest-
in-a-year-for-a-decade
Shitskin Hindu immigrants to blame.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
