Discussion:
Oh, Texas...
(too old to reply)
Alan Baker
2020-05-25 02:41:03 UTC
Permalink
<https://rt.live/>

Check out how they were doing 4 weeks ago versus today.
Jack Bohn
2020-05-25 11:00:20 UTC
Permalink
<https://rt.live/> 
Check out how they were doing 4 weeks ago versus today.
They were beginning an upward trend, that they are now turning around?
--
-Jack
h***@gmail.com
2020-05-25 14:00:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jack Bohn
<https://rt.live/> 
Check out how they were doing 4 weeks ago versus today.
They were beginning an upward trend, that they are now turning around?
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/texas/
7,500 new cases in the last week from 48,677 to 56,166
Active cases at their highest level yet
James Nicoll
2020-05-25 14:41:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Jack Bohn
<https://rt.live/> 
Check out how they were doing 4 weeks ago versus today.
They were beginning an upward trend, that they are now turning around?
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/texas/
7,500 new cases in the last week from 48,677 to 56,166
Active cases at their highest level yet
Presumably, all that's needed is to supply Texans with jugs of bleach
and anally inserted UVs lights and the percentage of fatalities due to
C19 will drop right off.
--
My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/
My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/
My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll
J. Clarke
2020-05-25 14:50:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Nicoll
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Jack Bohn
<https://rt.live/> 
Check out how they were doing 4 weeks ago versus today.
They were beginning an upward trend, that they are now turning around?
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/texas/
7,500 new cases in the last week from 48,677 to 56,166
Active cases at their highest level yet
Presumably, all that's needed is to supply Texans with jugs of bleach
and anally inserted UVs lights and the percentage of fatalities due to
C19 will drop right off.
All that's needed is to reduce testing to the same level as 4 weeks
ago.

Don't conflate an increase in _cases_ with an increase in
_infections_, it might be an increase in _testing_.
Peter Trei
2020-05-25 15:36:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Clarke
Post by James Nicoll
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Jack Bohn
<https://rt.live/> 
Check out how they were doing 4 weeks ago versus today.
They were beginning an upward trend, that they are now turning around?
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/texas/
7,500 new cases in the last week from 48,677 to 56,166
Active cases at their highest level yet
Presumably, all that's needed is to supply Texans with jugs of bleach
and anally inserted UVs lights and the percentage of fatalities due to
C19 will drop right off.
All that's needed is to reduce testing to the same level as 4 weeks
ago.
Don't conflate an increase in _cases_ with an increase in
_infections_, it might be an increase in _testing_.
The only hard numbers I've seen are number of hospitalizations.

The number of deaths is a floor, since in some places, deaths at home aren't counted as COVID 19.
I posted, a couple weeks ago, comparative year on year chart of number of deaths each month,
for all reasons. In NYS, people are dying at several times the usual rate. My family can't get a
time slot to bury my cousin, who died of the virus.

Pt
Dorothy J Heydt
2020-05-25 15:58:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Trei
Post by J. Clarke
Post by James Nicoll
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Jack Bohn
<https://rt.live/> 
Check out how they were doing 4 weeks ago versus today.
They were beginning an upward trend, that they are now turning around?
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/texas/
7,500 new cases in the last week from 48,677 to 56,166
Active cases at their highest level yet
Presumably, all that's needed is to supply Texans with jugs of bleach
and anally inserted UVs lights and the percentage of fatalities due to
C19 will drop right off.
All that's needed is to reduce testing to the same level as 4 weeks
ago.
Don't conflate an increase in _cases_ with an increase in
_infections_, it might be an increase in _testing_.
The only hard numbers I've seen are number of hospitalizations.
The number of deaths is a floor, since in some places, deaths at home
aren't counted as COVID 19.
I posted, a couple weeks ago, comparative year on year chart of number of deaths each month,
for all reasons. In NYS, people are dying at several times the usual
rate. My family can't get a
time slot to bury my cousin, who died of the virus.
I'm so sorry.
--
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
www.kithrup.com/~djheydt/
J. Clarke
2020-05-25 16:22:36 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 25 May 2020 08:36:59 -0700 (PDT), Peter Trei
Post by Peter Trei
Post by J. Clarke
Post by James Nicoll
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Jack Bohn
<https://rt.live/> 
Check out how they were doing 4 weeks ago versus today.
They were beginning an upward trend, that they are now turning around?
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/texas/
7,500 new cases in the last week from 48,677 to 56,166
Active cases at their highest level yet
Presumably, all that's needed is to supply Texans with jugs of bleach
and anally inserted UVs lights and the percentage of fatalities due to
C19 will drop right off.
All that's needed is to reduce testing to the same level as 4 weeks
ago.
Don't conflate an increase in _cases_ with an increase in
_infections_, it might be an increase in _testing_.
The only hard numbers I've seen are number of hospitalizations.
The number of deaths is a floor, since in some places, deaths at home aren't counted as COVID 19.
I posted, a couple weeks ago, comparative year on year chart of number of deaths each month,
for all reasons. In NYS, people are dying at several times the usual rate. My family can't get a
time slot to bury my cousin, who died of the virus.
That's not good. Sorry to hear about your cousin.
Alan Baker
2020-05-25 23:13:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Clarke
Post by James Nicoll
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Jack Bohn
Post by Alan Baker
<https://rt.live/>
Check out how they were doing 4 weeks ago versus today.
They were beginning an upward trend, that they are now turning around?
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/texas/
7,500 new cases in the last week from 48,677 to 56,166
Active cases at their highest level yet
Presumably, all that's needed is to supply Texans with jugs of bleach
and anally inserted UVs lights and the percentage of fatalities due to
C19 will drop right off.
All that's needed is to reduce testing to the same level as 4 weeks
ago.
Don't conflate an increase in _cases_ with an increase in
_infections_, it might be an increase in _testing_.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Dorothy J Heydt
2020-05-25 15:57:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Nicoll
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Jack Bohn
<https://rt.live/> 
Check out how they were doing 4 weeks ago versus today.
They were beginning an upward trend, that they are now turning around?
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/texas/
7,500 new cases in the last week from 48,677 to 56,166
Active cases at their highest level yet
Presumably, all that's needed is to supply Texans with jugs of bleach
and anally inserted UVs lights and the percentage of fatalities due to
C19 will drop right off.
Balanced by the rising number of fatalities due to what you just
described.

I forget which recent article about something going on in Texas
caused me to send the link to my daughter, commenting, "See what
a good idea it was for you to quit AT&T rather than be moved to
Texas?"

(I *think* it was about a very large number of Texans going to
the beach, social distancing, what social distancing?)
--
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
www.kithrup.com/~djheydt/
James Nicoll
2020-05-25 16:27:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by James Nicoll
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Jack Bohn
<https://rt.live/> 
Check out how they were doing 4 weeks ago versus today.
They were beginning an upward trend, that they are now turning around?
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/texas/
7,500 new cases in the last week from 48,677 to 56,166
Active cases at their highest level yet
Presumably, all that's needed is to supply Texans with jugs of bleach
and anally inserted UVs lights and the percentage of fatalities due to
C19 will drop right off.
Balanced by the rising number of fatalities due to what you just
described.
Isn't dying because one used treatements recommended by the President
treason? I am sure it must be. Probably bleach chuggers who died weren't
right with Jesus.
--
My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/
My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/
My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll
Dorothy J Heydt
2020-05-25 17:51:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Nicoll
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by James Nicoll
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Jack Bohn
<https://rt.live/> 
Check out how they were doing 4 weeks ago versus today.
They were beginning an upward trend, that they are now turning around?
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/texas/
7,500 new cases in the last week from 48,677 to 56,166
Active cases at their highest level yet
Presumably, all that's needed is to supply Texans with jugs of bleach
and anally inserted UVs lights and the percentage of fatalities due to
C19 will drop right off.
Balanced by the rising number of fatalities due to what you just
described.
Isn't dying because one used treatements recommended by the President
treason? I am sure it must be. Probably bleach chuggers who died weren't
right with Jesus.
Nor with ... who would be the patron saint of logic? I vote for
St. Catherine of Alexandria, who was martyred for winning all her
arguments with the pagan philosophers of that highly intellectual
city).

Anyway ...

/e grabs Pocket Constitution

Article III, Section 3. "Treason against the United States, shall
consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their
Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be
convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to
the same overt Act, or Confession in open Court."
--
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
www.kithrup.com/~djheydt/
J. Clarke
2020-05-25 20:56:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Nicoll
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by James Nicoll
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Jack Bohn
<https://rt.live/> 
Check out how they were doing 4 weeks ago versus today.
They were beginning an upward trend, that they are now turning around?
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/texas/
7,500 new cases in the last week from 48,677 to 56,166
Active cases at their highest level yet
Presumably, all that's needed is to supply Texans with jugs of bleach
and anally inserted UVs lights and the percentage of fatalities due to
C19 will drop right off.
Balanced by the rising number of fatalities due to what you just
described.
Isn't dying because one used treatements recommended by the President
treason? I am sure it must be. Probably bleach chuggers who died weren't
right with Jesus.
I'm getting tired of this assertion that bleach and the like were
"recommended by the President". He's a stupid ignorant man, he asked
a stupid ignorant question. Note--he _asked_. He did not say "this
is the cure", he did not say "take this, people of America", he said
"is there any way to use this", directing someone off-camera to check
it out.

Blame people for what they do, not what others claim they do.

The thing he did wrong was speculating on-camera.
Major Oz
2020-05-25 22:39:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Clarke
I'm getting tired of this assertion that bleach and the like were
"recommended by the President". He's a stupid ignorant man, he asked
a stupid ignorant question. Note--he _asked_. He did not say "this
is the cure", he did not say "take this, people of America", he said
"is there any way to use this", directing someone off-camera to check
it out.
Blame people for what they do, not what others claim they do.
The thing he did wrong was speculating on-camera.
There has been a plague infesting the nation since Trump's election.

Best described by beleeeeving what someone said about what he said.....rather than what he said.

It gets modified by what the media wishes you to beleeeeve.

I am exceedingly satisfied with what he has DONE, and don't give a ration of shit about what he says.

FYIYCTAJ
Alan Baker
2020-05-25 23:16:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Major Oz
Post by J. Clarke
I'm getting tired of this assertion that bleach and the like were
"recommended by the President". He's a stupid ignorant man, he asked
a stupid ignorant question. Note--he _asked_. He did not say "this
is the cure", he did not say "take this, people of America", he said
"is there any way to use this", directing someone off-camera to check
it out.
Blame people for what they do, not what others claim they do.
The thing he did wrong was speculating on-camera.
There has been a plague infesting the nation since Trump's election.
Best described by beleeeeving what someone said about what he said.....rather than what he said.
It gets modified by what the media wishes you to beleeeeve.
I am exceedingly satisfied with what he has DONE, and don't give a ration of shit about what he says.
FYIYCTAJ
So you're satisfied with the inaction from January 30 (when I partially
closed travel from China)...

...until March?
Chris Buckley
2020-05-26 02:28:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Major Oz
Post by J. Clarke
I'm getting tired of this assertion that bleach and the like were
"recommended by the President". He's a stupid ignorant man, he asked
a stupid ignorant question. Note--he _asked_. He did not say "this
is the cure", he did not say "take this, people of America", he said
"is there any way to use this", directing someone off-camera to check
it out.
Blame people for what they do, not what others claim they do.
The thing he did wrong was speculating on-camera.
There has been a plague infesting the nation since Trump's election.
Best described by beleeeeving what someone said about what he said.....rather than what he said.
It gets modified by what the media wishes you to beleeeeve.
I am exceedingly satisfied with what he has DONE, and don't give a ration of shit about what he says.
FYIYCTAJ
So you're satisfied with the inaction from January 30 (when I partially
closed travel from China)...
...until March?
Monday morning quarterbacking.

We are "blessed" in this country with a very adversarial political
setup. Please give me the dates that, say, Biden said we should close
down the country (or take other concrete action). Or Pelosi? Or Schumer?

There was no demand by the Democrats for anything helpful. They only
started to advocate for a national lockdown at the end of March. The
only consensus I remember of the Democrats was that Trump's thoughts
of quarantining the New York area were absolutely unacceptable and
illegal (ignoring the fact that a national lockdown is just as
illegal).

Trump's tweets and speeches are often ludicrous and that is an important
part of a President's responsibility that he is failing. And he made major
mistakes that we can see in hindsight:

He trusted the scientists at WHO much too long in their early
statements that travel restictions should not happen. They took an
inordinate amount of time to back off those statements. (WHO was
still advising against travel restrictions on February 29, but said
perhaps in certain circumstances such as settings with few
international connections and limited response capabilities.)

He trusted the scientists at CDC much too long as they had assumed the
responsibility of developing, certifying, and deploying a testing
program (as they had done in the previous recent epidemics). Note that
CDC is now not leading the efforts in the antibody tests and vaccines,
which has meant some chaos, but lots of options being pursued in
parallel.

But these are mistakes in hindsight. I trust the Democrats to point
out Trump's mistakes, and I can remember no consensus for action from
them at the time that would have affected things (they did demand that
Trump order the car companies to produce ventilators, but by then the
future supply of ventilators was already assured enough). What are
you remembering differently?

Chris
Alan Baker
2020-05-26 06:36:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chris Buckley
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Major Oz
Post by J. Clarke
I'm getting tired of this assertion that bleach and the like were
"recommended by the President". He's a stupid ignorant man, he asked
a stupid ignorant question. Note--he _asked_. He did not say "this
is the cure", he did not say "take this, people of America", he said
"is there any way to use this", directing someone off-camera to check
it out.
Blame people for what they do, not what others claim they do.
The thing he did wrong was speculating on-camera.
There has been a plague infesting the nation since Trump's election.
Best described by beleeeeving what someone said about what he said.....rather than what he said.
It gets modified by what the media wishes you to beleeeeve.
I am exceedingly satisfied with what he has DONE, and don't give a ration of shit about what he says.
FYIYCTAJ
So you're satisfied with the inaction from January 30 (when I partially
closed travel from China)...
...until March?
Monday morning quarterbacking.
We are "blessed" in this country with a very adversarial political
setup. Please give me the dates that, say, Biden said we should close
down the country (or take other concrete action). Or Pelosi? Or Schumer?
I don't care.

They were the ones in charge.

We KNOW Trump was being briefed on the seriousness of this.

And nothing was done.
h***@gmail.com
2020-05-26 09:16:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chris Buckley
Monday morning quarterbacking.
We are "blessed" in this country with a very adversarial political
setup. Please give me the dates that, say, Biden said we should close
down the country (or take other concrete action). Or Pelosi? Or Schumer?
Well you might want to check the pandemic response plan prepared under Obama

Trump Jan 22
"We have it totally under control. It's one person coming in from China. We have it under control. It's going to be just fine."


Feb 1
"The Democrats are politicizing the coronavirus. You know that, right?...

They tried the impeachment hoax. That was on a perfect conversation and this is their new hoax."

Mar 7
"What a problem. Came out of nowhere, but we're taking care of it...

And in terms of deaths, I don't know what the count is today. Is it 11? Eleven people? And in terms of cases, it's very, very few. When you look at other countries, it's a very tiny fraction because we've been very strong at the borders."

"They have the tests. And the tests are beautiful. Anybody that needs a test gets a test...

I like the numbers [of reported US coronavirus cases] being where they are. I don't need to have the numbers double because of one ship [the Grand Princess cruise ship docked in San Francisco with 21 confirmed coronavirus cases on board at the time]."

Mar 10
"And we're prepared, and we're doing a great job with it. And it will go away. Just stay calm. It will go away...

The consumer has never been in a better position than they are right now."

Biden
Jan 27
"...The outbreak of a new coronavirus, which has already infected more than 2,700 people and killed over 80 in China, will get worse before it gets better. Cases have been confirmed in a dozen countries, with at least five in the United States. There will likely be more."

Feb 1
"We are in the midst of a crisis with the coronavirus. We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump's record of hysteria, xenophobia, and fear-mongering. He is the worst possible person to lead our country through a global health emergency."

Feb 28
"No one takes the president's word for these things. He, at a minimum, exaggerates everything. And the idea that he's going to stand there and say, ‘everything is fine, don't worry,' who's going to believe that? Let the experts speak like we did in our administration."

Mar 1
"We knew that this was coming. Back as far as January. They didn't even begin to prepare the testing kits...

Donald Trump said just several days ago this was a Democratic hoax. What in God's name is he talking about? Has he no shame?"

"They have eliminated the office we set up -- we set up in the president's office to deal with pandemic diseases."


Feb 26
"Too little, too late," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said of the president's emergency funding request Monday. "We've seen no sign that President Trump has any plan or urgency to deal with the spread of the coronavirus — we need real leadership and we need it fast."

"Americans need a coordinated, fully-funded, whole-of-government response to keep them and their loved ones safe," Pelosi said in a statement late Monday. "The President's request for coronavirus response funding is long overdue and completely inadequate to the scale of this emergency."

She said the Democratic-majority House of Representatives will work quickly to move their own funding package that "fully addresses the scale and seriousness of this public health crisis."
Post by Chris Buckley
There was no demand by the Democrats for anything helpful.
Bullshit
Post by Chris Buckley
They only
started to advocate for a national lockdown at the end of March.
Earlier action would have stopped the need for a lockdown.
Post by Chris Buckley
The
only consensus I remember of the Democrats was that Trump's thoughts
of quarantining the New York area were absolutely unacceptable and
illegal (ignoring the fact that a national lockdown is just as
illegal).
Considering your lack of memory I don't see your assessment of what was asked for worth considering or your assessment of the legality
Post by Chris Buckley
Trump's tweets and speeches are often ludicrous and that is an important
part of a President's responsibility that he is failing. And he made major
He trusted the scientists at WHO much too long in their early
statements that travel restictions should not happen.
You might want to check what they actually said
Post by Chris Buckley
They took an
inordinate amount of time to back off those statements. (WHO was
still advising against travel restrictions on February 29, but said
perhaps in certain circumstances such as settings with few
international connections and limited response capabilities.)
He trusted the scientists at CDC much too long as they had assumed the
responsibility of developing, certifying, and deploying a testing
program (as they had done in the previous recent epidemics).
Largely due to Trump's political appointees wanting to reward donors and sidelining the actual science people
Post by Chris Buckley
Note that
CDC is now not leading the efforts in the antibody tests and vaccines,
which has meant some chaos, but lots of options being pursued in
parallel.
But these are mistakes in hindsight. I trust the Democrats to point
out Trump's mistakes, and I can remember no consensus for action from
them at the time that would have affected things (they did demand that
Trump order the car companies to produce ventilators, but by then the
future supply of ventilators was already assured enough). What are
you remembering differently?
Well for a start there was a pandemic response plan
Early on was to check for PPE and incubators
There was the pandemic response body which Trump split up
There was the design for a machine that would over a million N-95 masks a day which they commissioned but Trump didn't fund
There was the Tea Party refusing to fund building up stockpiles of equipment
Chris Buckley
2020-05-26 16:48:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
Monday morning quarterbacking.
We are "blessed" in this country with a very adversarial political
setup. Please give me the dates that, say, Biden said we should close
down the country (or take other concrete action). Or Pelosi? Or Schumer?
Well you might want to check the pandemic response plan prepared under Obama
Trump Jan 22
"We have it totally under control. It's one person coming in from China. We have it under control. It's going to be just fine."
Feb 1
"The Democrats are politicizing the coronavirus. You know that, right?...
They tried the impeachment hoax. That was on a perfect conversation and this is their new hoax."
Mar 7
"What a problem. Came out of nowhere, but we're taking care of it...
And in terms of deaths, I don't know what the count is today. Is it 11? Eleven people? And in terms of cases, it's very, very few. When you look at other countries, it's a very tiny fraction because we've been very strong at the borders."
"They have the tests. And the tests are beautiful. Anybody that needs a test gets a test...
I like the numbers [of reported US coronavirus cases] being where they are. I don't need to have the numbers double because of one ship [the Grand Princess cruise ship docked in San Francisco with 21 confirmed coronavirus cases on board at the time]."
Mar 10
"And we're prepared, and we're doing a great job with it. And it will go away. Just stay calm. It will go away...
The consumer has never been in a better position than they are right now."
Biden
Jan 27
"...The outbreak of a new coronavirus, which has already infected more than 2,700 people and killed over 80 in China, will get worse before it gets better. Cases have been confirmed in a dozen countries, with at least five in the United States. There will likely be more."
Feb 1
"We are in the midst of a crisis with the coronavirus. We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump's record of hysteria, xenophobia, and fear-mongering. He is the worst possible person to lead our country through a global health emergency."
Feb 28
"No one takes the president's word for these things. He, at a minimum, exaggerates everything. And the idea that he's going to stand there and say, ‘everything is fine, don't worry,' who's going to believe that? Let the experts speak like we did in our administration."
Mar 1
"We knew that this was coming. Back as far as January. They didn't even begin to prepare the testing kits...
Donald Trump said just several days ago this was a Democratic hoax. What in God's name is he talking about? Has he no shame?"
"They have eliminated the office we set up -- we set up in the president's office to deal with pandemic diseases."
As I said, I don't defend Trump's often ludicrous statements. I don't
like Trump; I didn't vote for him and won't. But I dislike TDS even
more. The national scene is absurd; IMO the only reason Trump got
elected in the first place was the free press of TDS, and it's a major
reason he might get re-elected. The scene in this newsgroup is just
as bad; you can't have discussions here without a certain liberal
coterie trying to shut down the conversations with meaningless insults
and accusations of people desiring other newsgroup members to die.
Post by h***@gmail.com
Feb 26
"Too little, too late," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said of the president's emergency funding request Monday. "We've seen no sign that President Trump has any plan or urgency to deal with the spread of the coronavirus — we need real leadership and we need it fast."
"Americans need a coordinated, fully-funded, whole-of-government response to keep them and their loved ones safe," Pelosi said in a statement late Monday. "The President's request for coronavirus response funding is long overdue and completely inadequate to the scale of this emergency."
She said the Democratic-majority House of Representatives will work quickly to move their own funding package that "fully addresses the scale and seriousness of this public health crisis."
OK. Please give me the concrete details of the Democratic plan and how,
if they had been implemented, they would have saved significant lives
(or any lives for that matter.)
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
There was no demand by the Democrats for anything helpful.
Bullshit
Post by Chris Buckley
They only
started to advocate for a national lockdown at the end of March.
Earlier action would have stopped the need for a lockdown.
Post by Chris Buckley
The
only consensus I remember of the Democrats was that Trump's thoughts
of quarantining the New York area were absolutely unacceptable and
illegal (ignoring the fact that a national lockdown is just as
illegal).
Considering your lack of memory I don't see your assessment of what was asked for worth considering or your assessment of the legality
Post by Chris Buckley
Trump's tweets and speeches are often ludicrous and that is an important
part of a President's responsibility that he is failing. And he made major
He trusted the scientists at WHO much too long in their early
statements that travel restictions should not happen.
You might want to check what they actually said
Post by Chris Buckley
They took an
inordinate amount of time to back off those statements. (WHO was
still advising against travel restrictions on February 29, but said
perhaps in certain circumstances such as settings with few
international connections and limited response capabilities.)
My evidence:
https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/updated-who-recommendations-for-international-traffic-in-relation-to-covid-19-outbreak

Your evidence:????
YOU might want to check what they actually said.
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
He trusted the scientists at CDC much too long as they had assumed the
responsibility of developing, certifying, and deploying a testing
program (as they had done in the previous recent epidemics).
Largely due to Trump's political appointees wanting to reward donors and sidelining the actual science people.
Baloney. Normal minor political issues. Some scientists were right and
some scientists were wrong. The major issue is that by policy the CDC
was set up as a single point of failure, and this is something that
the CDC was in favor of (they had the expertise, they should be in
charge.) Surely you're not suggesting that you would have been in favor
of Trump taking power away from a federal scientific organization?
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
Note that
CDC is now not leading the efforts in the antibody tests and vaccines,
which has meant some chaos, but lots of options being pursued in
parallel.
But these are mistakes in hindsight. I trust the Democrats to point
out Trump's mistakes, and I can remember no consensus for action from
them at the time that would have affected things (they did demand that
Trump order the car companies to produce ventilators, but by then the
future supply of ventilators was already assured enough). What are
you remembering differently?
Well for a start there was a pandemic response plan
Early on was to check for PPE and incubators
There was the pandemic response body which Trump split up
There was the design for a machine that would over a million N-95 masks a day which they commissioned but Trump didn't fund
There was the Tea Party refusing to fund building up stockpiles of equipment
Monday morning quarterbacking (and I would quibble with all of those
items, eg Trump did not split up a pandemic response body; he merged 2
bodies. No one lost their job). Yes, in hindsight there are
absolutely things that could have been done. That will always be true.
But the major thing Trump is being blamed for is following the advice
of the WHO. That seems to be true for you, too, Hamish.

People forget that the goal of travel restrictions and stay-in-place
was not to keep individuals from getting Covid-19; it was to ensure
that if they got Covid-19, there would be good medical resources
available to treat them. We have succeeded in that goal, though the
New York area was close.

Chris
Alan Baker
2020-05-26 16:52:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chris Buckley
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
Monday morning quarterbacking.
We are "blessed" in this country with a very adversarial political
setup. Please give me the dates that, say, Biden said we should close
down the country (or take other concrete action). Or Pelosi? Or Schumer?
Well you might want to check the pandemic response plan prepared under Obama
Trump Jan 22
"We have it totally under control. It's one person coming in from China. We have it under control. It's going to be just fine."
Feb 1
"The Democrats are politicizing the coronavirus. You know that, right?...
They tried the impeachment hoax. That was on a perfect conversation and this is their new hoax."
Mar 7
"What a problem. Came out of nowhere, but we're taking care of it...
And in terms of deaths, I don't know what the count is today. Is it 11? Eleven people? And in terms of cases, it's very, very few. When you look at other countries, it's a very tiny fraction because we've been very strong at the borders."
"They have the tests. And the tests are beautiful. Anybody that needs a test gets a test...
I like the numbers [of reported US coronavirus cases] being where they are. I don't need to have the numbers double because of one ship [the Grand Princess cruise ship docked in San Francisco with 21 confirmed coronavirus cases on board at the time]."
Mar 10
"And we're prepared, and we're doing a great job with it. And it will go away. Just stay calm. It will go away...
The consumer has never been in a better position than they are right now."
Biden
Jan 27
"...The outbreak of a new coronavirus, which has already infected more than 2,700 people and killed over 80 in China, will get worse before it gets better. Cases have been confirmed in a dozen countries, with at least five in the United States. There will likely be more."
Feb 1
"We are in the midst of a crisis with the coronavirus. We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump's record of hysteria, xenophobia, and fear-mongering. He is the worst possible person to lead our country through a global health emergency."
Feb 28
"No one takes the president's word for these things. He, at a minimum, exaggerates everything. And the idea that he's going to stand there and say, ‘everything is fine, don't worry,' who's going to believe that? Let the experts speak like we did in our administration."
Mar 1
"We knew that this was coming. Back as far as January. They didn't even begin to prepare the testing kits...
Donald Trump said just several days ago this was a Democratic hoax. What in God's name is he talking about? Has he no shame?"
"They have eliminated the office we set up -- we set up in the president's office to deal with pandemic diseases."
As I said, I don't defend Trump's often ludicrous statements. I don't
like Trump; I didn't vote for him and won't. But I dislike TDS even
more. The national scene is absurd; IMO the only reason Trump got
elected in the first place was the free press of TDS, and it's a major
reason he might get re-elected. The scene in this newsgroup is just
as bad; you can't have discussions here without a certain liberal
coterie trying to shut down the conversations with meaningless insults
and accusations of people desiring other newsgroup members to die.
Post by h***@gmail.com
Feb 26
"Too little, too late," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said of the president's emergency funding request Monday. "We've seen no sign that President Trump has any plan or urgency to deal with the spread of the coronavirus — we need real leadership and we need it fast."
"Americans need a coordinated, fully-funded, whole-of-government response to keep them and their loved ones safe," Pelosi said in a statement late Monday. "The President's request for coronavirus response funding is long overdue and completely inadequate to the scale of this emergency."
She said the Democratic-majority House of Representatives will work quickly to move their own funding package that "fully addresses the scale and seriousness of this public health crisis."
OK. Please give me the concrete details of the Democratic plan and how,
if they had been implemented, they would have saved significant lives
(or any lives for that matter.)
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
There was no demand by the Democrats for anything helpful.
Bullshit
Post by Chris Buckley
They only
started to advocate for a national lockdown at the end of March.
Earlier action would have stopped the need for a lockdown.
Post by Chris Buckley
The
only consensus I remember of the Democrats was that Trump's thoughts
of quarantining the New York area were absolutely unacceptable and
illegal (ignoring the fact that a national lockdown is just as
illegal).
Considering your lack of memory I don't see your assessment of what was asked for worth considering or your assessment of the legality
Post by Chris Buckley
Trump's tweets and speeches are often ludicrous and that is an important
part of a President's responsibility that he is failing. And he made major
He trusted the scientists at WHO much too long in their early
statements that travel restictions should not happen.
You might want to check what they actually said
Post by Chris Buckley
They took an
inordinate amount of time to back off those statements. (WHO was
still advising against travel restrictions on February 29, but said
perhaps in certain circumstances such as settings with few
international connections and limited response capabilities.)
https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/updated-who-recommendations-for-international-traffic-in-relation-to-covid-19-outbreak
Your evidence:????
YOU might want to check what they actually said.
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
He trusted the scientists at CDC much too long as they had assumed the
responsibility of developing, certifying, and deploying a testing
program (as they had done in the previous recent epidemics).
Largely due to Trump's political appointees wanting to reward donors and sidelining the actual science people.
Baloney. Normal minor political issues. Some scientists were right and
some scientists were wrong. The major issue is that by policy the CDC
was set up as a single point of failure, and this is something that
the CDC was in favor of (they had the expertise, they should be in
charge.) Surely you're not suggesting that you would have been in favor
of Trump taking power away from a federal scientific organization?
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
Note that
CDC is now not leading the efforts in the antibody tests and vaccines,
which has meant some chaos, but lots of options being pursued in
parallel.
But these are mistakes in hindsight. I trust the Democrats to point
out Trump's mistakes, and I can remember no consensus for action from
them at the time that would have affected things (they did demand that
Trump order the car companies to produce ventilators, but by then the
future supply of ventilators was already assured enough). What are
you remembering differently?
Well for a start there was a pandemic response plan
Early on was to check for PPE and incubators
There was the pandemic response body which Trump split up
There was the design for a machine that would over a million N-95 masks a day which they commissioned but Trump didn't fund
There was the Tea Party refusing to fund building up stockpiles of equipment
Monday morning quarterbacking (and I would quibble with all of those
items, eg Trump did not split up a pandemic response body; he merged 2
bodies. No one lost their job). Yes, in hindsight there are
absolutely things that could have been done. That will always be true.
But the major thing Trump is being blamed for is following the advice
of the WHO. That seems to be true for you, too, Hamish.
People forget that the goal of travel restrictions and stay-in-place
was not to keep individuals from getting Covid-19; it was to ensure
that if they got Covid-19, there would be good medical resources
available to treat them. We have succeeded in that goal, though the
New York area was close.
My inability to articulate what others might have done won't change the
fact that aside from blocking SOME people (not all) from coming in from
China...

...TRUMP DID NOTHING FOR A FULL MONTH.
Chris Buckley
2020-05-26 18:08:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Chris Buckley
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
Monday morning quarterbacking.
We are "blessed" in this country with a very adversarial political
setup. Please give me the dates that, say, Biden said we should close
down the country (or take other concrete action). Or Pelosi? Or Schumer?
Well you might want to check the pandemic response plan prepared under Obama
Trump Jan 22
"We have it totally under control. It's one person coming in from China. We have it under control. It's going to be just fine."
Feb 1
"The Democrats are politicizing the coronavirus. You know that, right?...
They tried the impeachment hoax. That was on a perfect conversation and this is their new hoax."
Mar 7
"What a problem. Came out of nowhere, but we're taking care of it...
And in terms of deaths, I don't know what the count is today. Is it 11? Eleven people? And in terms of cases, it's very, very few. When you look at other countries, it's a very tiny fraction because we've been very strong at the borders."
"They have the tests. And the tests are beautiful. Anybody that needs a test gets a test...
I like the numbers [of reported US coronavirus cases] being where they are. I don't need to have the numbers double because of one ship [the Grand Princess cruise ship docked in San Francisco with 21 confirmed coronavirus cases on board at the time]."
Mar 10
"And we're prepared, and we're doing a great job with it. And it will go away. Just stay calm. It will go away...
The consumer has never been in a better position than they are right now."
Biden
Jan 27
"...The outbreak of a new coronavirus, which has already infected more than 2,700 people and killed over 80 in China, will get worse before it gets better. Cases have been confirmed in a dozen countries, with at least five in the United States. There will likely be more."
Feb 1
"We are in the midst of a crisis with the coronavirus. We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump's record of hysteria, xenophobia, and fear-mongering. He is the worst possible person to lead our country through a global health emergency."
Feb 28
"No one takes the president's word for these things. He, at a minimum, exaggerates everything. And the idea that he's going to stand there and say, ‘everything is fine, don't worry,' who's going to believe that? Let the experts speak like we did in our administration."
Mar 1
"We knew that this was coming. Back as far as January. They didn't even begin to prepare the testing kits...
Donald Trump said just several days ago this was a Democratic hoax. What in God's name is he talking about? Has he no shame?"
"They have eliminated the office we set up -- we set up in the president's office to deal with pandemic diseases."
As I said, I don't defend Trump's often ludicrous statements. I don't
like Trump; I didn't vote for him and won't. But I dislike TDS even
more. The national scene is absurd; IMO the only reason Trump got
elected in the first place was the free press of TDS, and it's a major
reason he might get re-elected. The scene in this newsgroup is just
as bad; you can't have discussions here without a certain liberal
coterie trying to shut down the conversations with meaningless insults
and accusations of people desiring other newsgroup members to die.
Post by h***@gmail.com
Feb 26
"Too little, too late," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said of the president's emergency funding request Monday. "We've seen no sign that President Trump has any plan or urgency to deal with the spread of the coronavirus — we need real leadership and we need it fast."
"Americans need a coordinated, fully-funded, whole-of-government response to keep them and their loved ones safe," Pelosi said in a statement late Monday. "The President's request for coronavirus response funding is long overdue and completely inadequate to the scale of this emergency."
She said the Democratic-majority House of Representatives will work quickly to move their own funding package that "fully addresses the scale and seriousness of this public health crisis."
OK. Please give me the concrete details of the Democratic plan and how,
if they had been implemented, they would have saved significant lives
(or any lives for that matter.)
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
There was no demand by the Democrats for anything helpful.
Bullshit
Post by Chris Buckley
They only
started to advocate for a national lockdown at the end of March.
Earlier action would have stopped the need for a lockdown.
Post by Chris Buckley
The
only consensus I remember of the Democrats was that Trump's thoughts
of quarantining the New York area were absolutely unacceptable and
illegal (ignoring the fact that a national lockdown is just as
illegal).
Considering your lack of memory I don't see your assessment of what was asked for worth considering or your assessment of the legality
Post by Chris Buckley
Trump's tweets and speeches are often ludicrous and that is an important
part of a President's responsibility that he is failing. And he made major
He trusted the scientists at WHO much too long in their early
statements that travel restictions should not happen.
You might want to check what they actually said
Post by Chris Buckley
They took an
inordinate amount of time to back off those statements. (WHO was
still advising against travel restrictions on February 29, but said
perhaps in certain circumstances such as settings with few
international connections and limited response capabilities.)
https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/updated-who-recommendations-for-international-traffic-in-relation-to-covid-19-outbreak
Your evidence:????
YOU might want to check what they actually said.
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
He trusted the scientists at CDC much too long as they had assumed the
responsibility of developing, certifying, and deploying a testing
program (as they had done in the previous recent epidemics).
Largely due to Trump's political appointees wanting to reward donors and sidelining the actual science people.
Baloney. Normal minor political issues. Some scientists were right and
some scientists were wrong. The major issue is that by policy the CDC
was set up as a single point of failure, and this is something that
the CDC was in favor of (they had the expertise, they should be in
charge.) Surely you're not suggesting that you would have been in favor
of Trump taking power away from a federal scientific organization?
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
Note that
CDC is now not leading the efforts in the antibody tests and vaccines,
which has meant some chaos, but lots of options being pursued in
parallel.
But these are mistakes in hindsight. I trust the Democrats to point
out Trump's mistakes, and I can remember no consensus for action from
them at the time that would have affected things (they did demand that
Trump order the car companies to produce ventilators, but by then the
future supply of ventilators was already assured enough). What are
you remembering differently?
Well for a start there was a pandemic response plan
Early on was to check for PPE and incubators
There was the pandemic response body which Trump split up
There was the design for a machine that would over a million N-95 masks a day which they commissioned but Trump didn't fund
There was the Tea Party refusing to fund building up stockpiles of equipment
Monday morning quarterbacking (and I would quibble with all of those
items, eg Trump did not split up a pandemic response body; he merged 2
bodies. No one lost their job). Yes, in hindsight there are
absolutely things that could have been done. That will always be true.
But the major thing Trump is being blamed for is following the advice
of the WHO. That seems to be true for you, too, Hamish.
People forget that the goal of travel restrictions and stay-in-place
was not to keep individuals from getting Covid-19; it was to ensure
that if they got Covid-19, there would be good medical resources
available to treat them. We have succeeded in that goal, though the
New York area was close.
My inability to articulate what others might have done won't change the
fact that aside from blocking SOME people (not all) from coming in from
China...
...TRUMP DID NOTHING FOR A FULL MONTH.
You know, putting statements in caps doesn't make them magically true.
Your statement is just false, as you undoubtedly know (but are still
willing to say for some reason?). What he did may have been
insufficient, but it was certainly more than NOTHING.

He did nothing with travel restrictions. Note that during February,
WHO was flatly saying that travel restrictions should not be imposed.
It was only on February 29th that they finally suggested that
restrictions might be useful in some circumstances (which still didn't
apply to the US.)

The other major area that could have saved lives was testing. As the
problems at the CDC became more and more apparent, restrictions on outside
labs were loosened throughout the month, until all FDA oversight was removed
by the end of the month. That's not NOTHING.

There were at least 2 federal vaccine efforts started in February. In
addition, Trump requested 2.5 billion from Congress on the 24th - the
Democrats finally got into the act and said we want more (but not for
much that would have had an immediate impact on saving lives). Again,
both amounts insufficient, as became clearer later on, but not
NOTHING.

Both sides seem to be equally adept at exageration.

Chris
Lynn McGuire
2020-05-26 19:03:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chris Buckley
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Chris Buckley
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
Monday morning quarterbacking.
We are "blessed" in this country with a very adversarial political
setup. Please give me the dates that, say, Biden said we should close
down the country (or take other concrete action). Or Pelosi? Or Schumer?
Well you might want to check the pandemic response plan prepared under Obama
Trump Jan 22
"We have it totally under control. It's one person coming in from China. We have it under control. It's going to be just fine."
Feb 1
"The Democrats are politicizing the coronavirus. You know that, right?...
They tried the impeachment hoax. That was on a perfect conversation and this is their new hoax."
Mar 7
"What a problem. Came out of nowhere, but we're taking care of it...
And in terms of deaths, I don't know what the count is today. Is it 11? Eleven people? And in terms of cases, it's very, very few. When you look at other countries, it's a very tiny fraction because we've been very strong at the borders."
"They have the tests. And the tests are beautiful. Anybody that needs a test gets a test...
I like the numbers [of reported US coronavirus cases] being where they are. I don't need to have the numbers double because of one ship [the Grand Princess cruise ship docked in San Francisco with 21 confirmed coronavirus cases on board at the time]."
Mar 10
"And we're prepared, and we're doing a great job with it. And it will go away. Just stay calm. It will go away...
The consumer has never been in a better position than they are right now."
Biden
Jan 27
"...The outbreak of a new coronavirus, which has already infected more than 2,700 people and killed over 80 in China, will get worse before it gets better. Cases have been confirmed in a dozen countries, with at least five in the United States. There will likely be more."
Feb 1
"We are in the midst of a crisis with the coronavirus. We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump's record of hysteria, xenophobia, and fear-mongering. He is the worst possible person to lead our country through a global health emergency."
Feb 28
"No one takes the president's word for these things. He, at a minimum, exaggerates everything. And the idea that he's going to stand there and say, ‘everything is fine, don't worry,' who's going to believe that? Let the experts speak like we did in our administration."
Mar 1
"We knew that this was coming. Back as far as January. They didn't even begin to prepare the testing kits...
Donald Trump said just several days ago this was a Democratic hoax. What in God's name is he talking about? Has he no shame?"
"They have eliminated the office we set up -- we set up in the president's office to deal with pandemic diseases."
As I said, I don't defend Trump's often ludicrous statements. I don't
like Trump; I didn't vote for him and won't. But I dislike TDS even
more. The national scene is absurd; IMO the only reason Trump got
elected in the first place was the free press of TDS, and it's a major
reason he might get re-elected. The scene in this newsgroup is just
as bad; you can't have discussions here without a certain liberal
coterie trying to shut down the conversations with meaningless insults
and accusations of people desiring other newsgroup members to die.
Post by h***@gmail.com
Feb 26
"Too little, too late," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said of the president's emergency funding request Monday. "We've seen no sign that President Trump has any plan or urgency to deal with the spread of the coronavirus — we need real leadership and we need it fast."
"Americans need a coordinated, fully-funded, whole-of-government response to keep them and their loved ones safe," Pelosi said in a statement late Monday. "The President's request for coronavirus response funding is long overdue and completely inadequate to the scale of this emergency."
She said the Democratic-majority House of Representatives will work quickly to move their own funding package that "fully addresses the scale and seriousness of this public health crisis."
OK. Please give me the concrete details of the Democratic plan and how,
if they had been implemented, they would have saved significant lives
(or any lives for that matter.)
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
There was no demand by the Democrats for anything helpful.
Bullshit
Post by Chris Buckley
They only
started to advocate for a national lockdown at the end of March.
Earlier action would have stopped the need for a lockdown.
Post by Chris Buckley
The
only consensus I remember of the Democrats was that Trump's thoughts
of quarantining the New York area were absolutely unacceptable and
illegal (ignoring the fact that a national lockdown is just as
illegal).
Considering your lack of memory I don't see your assessment of what was asked for worth considering or your assessment of the legality
Post by Chris Buckley
Trump's tweets and speeches are often ludicrous and that is an important
part of a President's responsibility that he is failing. And he made major
He trusted the scientists at WHO much too long in their early
statements that travel restictions should not happen.
You might want to check what they actually said
Post by Chris Buckley
They took an
inordinate amount of time to back off those statements. (WHO was
still advising against travel restrictions on February 29, but said
perhaps in certain circumstances such as settings with few
international connections and limited response capabilities.)
https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/updated-who-recommendations-for-international-traffic-in-relation-to-covid-19-outbreak
Your evidence:????
YOU might want to check what they actually said.
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
He trusted the scientists at CDC much too long as they had assumed the
responsibility of developing, certifying, and deploying a testing
program (as they had done in the previous recent epidemics).
Largely due to Trump's political appointees wanting to reward donors and sidelining the actual science people.
Baloney. Normal minor political issues. Some scientists were right and
some scientists were wrong. The major issue is that by policy the CDC
was set up as a single point of failure, and this is something that
the CDC was in favor of (they had the expertise, they should be in
charge.) Surely you're not suggesting that you would have been in favor
of Trump taking power away from a federal scientific organization?
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
Note that
CDC is now not leading the efforts in the antibody tests and vaccines,
which has meant some chaos, but lots of options being pursued in
parallel.
But these are mistakes in hindsight. I trust the Democrats to point
out Trump's mistakes, and I can remember no consensus for action from
them at the time that would have affected things (they did demand that
Trump order the car companies to produce ventilators, but by then the
future supply of ventilators was already assured enough). What are
you remembering differently?
Well for a start there was a pandemic response plan
Early on was to check for PPE and incubators
There was the pandemic response body which Trump split up
There was the design for a machine that would over a million N-95 masks a day which they commissioned but Trump didn't fund
There was the Tea Party refusing to fund building up stockpiles of equipment
Monday morning quarterbacking (and I would quibble with all of those
items, eg Trump did not split up a pandemic response body; he merged 2
bodies. No one lost their job). Yes, in hindsight there are
absolutely things that could have been done. That will always be true.
But the major thing Trump is being blamed for is following the advice
of the WHO. That seems to be true for you, too, Hamish.
People forget that the goal of travel restrictions and stay-in-place
was not to keep individuals from getting Covid-19; it was to ensure
that if they got Covid-19, there would be good medical resources
available to treat them. We have succeeded in that goal, though the
New York area was close.
My inability to articulate what others might have done won't change the
fact that aside from blocking SOME people (not all) from coming in from
China...
...TRUMP DID NOTHING FOR A FULL MONTH.
You know, putting statements in caps doesn't make them magically true.
Your statement is just false, as you undoubtedly know (but are still
willing to say for some reason?). What he did may have been
insufficient, but it was certainly more than NOTHING.
He did nothing with travel restrictions. Note that during February,
WHO was flatly saying that travel restrictions should not be imposed.
It was only on February 29th that they finally suggested that
restrictions might be useful in some circumstances (which still didn't
apply to the US.)
The other major area that could have saved lives was testing. As the
problems at the CDC became more and more apparent, restrictions on outside
labs were loosened throughout the month, until all FDA oversight was removed
by the end of the month. That's not NOTHING.
There were at least 2 federal vaccine efforts started in February. In
addition, Trump requested 2.5 billion from Congress on the 24th - the
Democrats finally got into the act and said we want more (but not for
much that would have had an immediate impact on saving lives). Again,
both amounts insufficient, as became clearer later on, but not
NOTHING.
Both sides seem to be equally adept at exageration.
Chris
I have killfiled Hamish and Alan Baker as they are foaming at the mouth
certifiable lunatics. Replying to them brings their lunacy back to view
for me. Please feel free to let them vent into the ether.

Lynn
h***@gmail.com
2020-05-27 05:01:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
I have killfiled Hamish and Alan Baker as they are foaming at the mouth
certifiable lunatics.
Which is Lynn speak for
"accept the science of human driven climate change and point out where Lynn is wrong"
Post by Lynn McGuire
Replying to them brings their lunacy back to view
for me. Please feel free to let them vent into the ether.
Lynn
Moriarty
2020-05-27 06:10:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Lynn McGuire
I have killfiled Hamish and Alan Baker as they are foaming at the mouth
certifiable lunatics.
Which is Lynn speak for
"accept the science of human driven climate change and point out where Lynn is wrong"
In your case, yes. Alan Baker foams a lot though.

-Moriarty
Titus G
2020-05-27 07:57:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Moriarty
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Lynn McGuire
I have killfiled Hamish and Alan Baker as they are foaming at the mouth
certifiable lunatics.
Which is Lynn speak for
"accept the science of human driven climate change and point out where Lynn is wrong"
In your case, yes. Alan Baker foams a lot though.
-Moriarty
It is surely an honour or at least a boost to one's self esteem to be in
the Dimwire's killfile?
I achieved it after convincing him that he was a greater martyr than
either Paul or Job but some have achieved it with facts,
Whilst Alan Baker may be astonishingly arrogant, he appears to be in the
Hamish Laws category of Horrible People Who Rely On Facts.
Chris Buckley
2020-05-27 12:35:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Titus G
Post by Moriarty
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Lynn McGuire
I have killfiled Hamish and Alan Baker as they are foaming at the mouth
certifiable lunatics.
Which is Lynn speak for
"accept the science of human driven climate change and point out where Lynn is wrong"
In your case, yes. Alan Baker foams a lot though.
-Moriarty
It is surely an honour or at least a boost to one's self esteem to be in
the Dimwire's killfile?
I achieved it after convincing him that he was a greater martyr than
either Paul or Job but some have achieved it with facts,
Whilst Alan Baker may be astonishingly arrogant, he appears to be in the
Hamish Laws category of Horrible People Who Rely On Facts.
No. TDS symptom. You agree with them and therefore you treat what they
say as facts.

Chris
Titus G
2020-05-27 15:55:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chris Buckley
Post by Titus G
Post by Moriarty
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Lynn McGuire
I have killfiled Hamish and Alan Baker as they are foaming at the mouth
certifiable lunatics.
Which is Lynn speak for
"accept the science of human driven climate change and point out where Lynn is wrong"
In your case, yes. Alan Baker foams a lot though.
-Moriarty
It is surely an honour or at least a boost to one's self esteem to be in
the Dimwire's killfile?
I achieved it after convincing him that he was a greater martyr than
either Paul or Job but some have achieved it with facts,
Whilst Alan Baker may be astonishingly arrogant, he appears to be in the
Hamish Laws category of Horrible People Who Rely On Facts.
No. TDS symptom. You agree with them and therefore you treat what they
say as facts.
Chris
This appears to be a Catch 22 trap.
If I watch a video of Trump blatantly lying and contradicting his own
statements or read his tweets in which he blatantly lies and contradicts
his own statements then I have caught a mental illness?
Because I have read Wikileaks and am aware of the corrupt control of the
Democrat party by the Clinton faction, because I have read Hilary's
private Wall Street speeches which completely contradict her public
speeches, do I also have Clinton Derangement Syndrome?
How serious are these illnesses?
Are they recognised by WHO?
Has Trump introduced extensive testing to identify possible victims?
Is there a vaccine available or re-education camp I could attend?
Alan Baker
2020-05-28 04:27:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chris Buckley
Post by Titus G
Post by Moriarty
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Lynn McGuire
I have killfiled Hamish and Alan Baker as they are foaming at the mouth
certifiable lunatics.
Which is Lynn speak for
"accept the science of human driven climate change and point out where Lynn is wrong"
In your case, yes. Alan Baker foams a lot though.
-Moriarty
It is surely an honour or at least a boost to one's self esteem to be in
the Dimwire's killfile?
I achieved it after convincing him that he was a greater martyr than
either Paul or Job but some have achieved it with facts,
Whilst Alan Baker may be astonishingly arrogant, he appears to be in the
Hamish Laws category of Horrible People Who Rely On Facts.
No. TDS symptom. You agree with them and therefore you treat what they
say as facts.
Chris
Sorry, sonny... ...you are the one with delusions.
Alan Baker
2020-05-29 19:07:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Titus G
Post by Moriarty
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Lynn McGuire
I have killfiled Hamish and Alan Baker as they are foaming at the mouth
certifiable lunatics.
Which is Lynn speak for
"accept the science of human driven climate change and point out where Lynn is wrong"
In your case, yes. Alan Baker foams a lot though.
-Moriarty
It is surely an honour or at least a boost to one's self esteem to be in
the Dimwire's killfile?
I achieved it after convincing him that he was a greater martyr than
either Paul or Job but some have achieved it with facts,
Whilst Alan Baker may be astonishingly arrogant, he appears to be in the
Hamish Laws category of Horrible People Who Rely On Facts.
Guilty on both counts.

:-)
Alan Baker
2020-05-29 19:10:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Moriarty
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Lynn McGuire
I have killfiled Hamish and Alan Baker as they are foaming at the mouth
certifiable lunatics.
Which is Lynn speak for
"accept the science of human driven climate change and point out where Lynn is wrong"
In your case, yes. Alan Baker foams a lot though.
-Moriarty
It's an outlet for me. I'm not proud of it...

:-)

Robert Carnegie
2020-05-26 19:22:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chris Buckley
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Chris Buckley
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
Monday morning quarterbacking.
We are "blessed" in this country with a very adversarial political
setup. Please give me the dates that, say, Biden said we should close
down the country (or take other concrete action). Or Pelosi? Or Schumer?
Well you might want to check the pandemic response plan prepared under Obama
Trump Jan 22
"We have it totally under control. It's one person coming in from China. We have it under control. It's going to be just fine."
Feb 1
"The Democrats are politicizing the coronavirus. You know that, right?...
They tried the impeachment hoax. That was on a perfect conversation and this is their new hoax."
Mar 7
"What a problem. Came out of nowhere, but we're taking care of it...
And in terms of deaths, I don't know what the count is today. Is it 11? Eleven people? And in terms of cases, it's very, very few. When you look at other countries, it's a very tiny fraction because we've been very strong at the borders."
"They have the tests. And the tests are beautiful. Anybody that needs a test gets a test...
I like the numbers [of reported US coronavirus cases] being where they are. I don't need to have the numbers double because of one ship [the Grand Princess cruise ship docked in San Francisco with 21 confirmed coronavirus cases on board at the time]."
Mar 10
"And we're prepared, and we're doing a great job with it. And it will go away. Just stay calm. It will go away...
The consumer has never been in a better position than they are right now."
Biden
Jan 27
"...The outbreak of a new coronavirus, which has already infected more than 2,700 people and killed over 80 in China, will get worse before it gets better. Cases have been confirmed in a dozen countries, with at least five in the United States. There will likely be more."
Feb 1
"We are in the midst of a crisis with the coronavirus. We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump's record of hysteria, xenophobia, and fear-mongering. He is the worst possible person to lead our country through a global health emergency."
Feb 28
"No one takes the president's word for these things. He, at a minimum, exaggerates everything. And the idea that he's going to stand there and say, ‘everything is fine, don't worry,' who's going to believe that? Let the experts speak like we did in our administration."
Mar 1
"We knew that this was coming. Back as far as January. They didn't even begin to prepare the testing kits...
Donald Trump said just several days ago this was a Democratic hoax. What in God's name is he talking about? Has he no shame?"
"They have eliminated the office we set up -- we set up in the president's office to deal with pandemic diseases."
As I said, I don't defend Trump's often ludicrous statements. I don't
like Trump; I didn't vote for him and won't. But I dislike TDS even
more. The national scene is absurd; IMO the only reason Trump got
elected in the first place was the free press of TDS, and it's a major
reason he might get re-elected. The scene in this newsgroup is just
as bad; you can't have discussions here without a certain liberal
coterie trying to shut down the conversations with meaningless insults
and accusations of people desiring other newsgroup members to die.
Post by h***@gmail.com
Feb 26
"Too little, too late," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said of the president's emergency funding request Monday. "We've seen no sign that President Trump has any plan or urgency to deal with the spread of the coronavirus — we need real leadership and we need it fast."
"Americans need a coordinated, fully-funded, whole-of-government response to keep them and their loved ones safe," Pelosi said in a statement late Monday. "The President's request for coronavirus response funding is long overdue and completely inadequate to the scale of this emergency."
She said the Democratic-majority House of Representatives will work quickly to move their own funding package that "fully addresses the scale and seriousness of this public health crisis."
OK. Please give me the concrete details of the Democratic plan and how,
if they had been implemented, they would have saved significant lives
(or any lives for that matter.)
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
There was no demand by the Democrats for anything helpful.
Bullshit
Post by Chris Buckley
They only
started to advocate for a national lockdown at the end of March.
Earlier action would have stopped the need for a lockdown.
Post by Chris Buckley
The
only consensus I remember of the Democrats was that Trump's thoughts
of quarantining the New York area were absolutely unacceptable and
illegal (ignoring the fact that a national lockdown is just as
illegal).
Considering your lack of memory I don't see your assessment of what was asked for worth considering or your assessment of the legality
Post by Chris Buckley
Trump's tweets and speeches are often ludicrous and that is an important
part of a President's responsibility that he is failing. And he made major
He trusted the scientists at WHO much too long in their early
statements that travel restictions should not happen.
You might want to check what they actually said
Post by Chris Buckley
They took an
inordinate amount of time to back off those statements. (WHO was
still advising against travel restrictions on February 29, but said
perhaps in certain circumstances such as settings with few
international connections and limited response capabilities.)
https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/updated-who-recommendations-for-international-traffic-in-relation-to-covid-19-outbreak
Your evidence:????
YOU might want to check what they actually said.
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
He trusted the scientists at CDC much too long as they had assumed the
responsibility of developing, certifying, and deploying a testing
program (as they had done in the previous recent epidemics).
Largely due to Trump's political appointees wanting to reward donors and sidelining the actual science people.
Baloney. Normal minor political issues. Some scientists were right and
some scientists were wrong. The major issue is that by policy the CDC
was set up as a single point of failure, and this is something that
the CDC was in favor of (they had the expertise, they should be in
charge.) Surely you're not suggesting that you would have been in favor
of Trump taking power away from a federal scientific organization?
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
Note that
CDC is now not leading the efforts in the antibody tests and vaccines,
which has meant some chaos, but lots of options being pursued in
parallel.
But these are mistakes in hindsight. I trust the Democrats to point
out Trump's mistakes, and I can remember no consensus for action from
them at the time that would have affected things (they did demand that
Trump order the car companies to produce ventilators, but by then the
future supply of ventilators was already assured enough). What are
you remembering differently?
Well for a start there was a pandemic response plan
Early on was to check for PPE and incubators
There was the pandemic response body which Trump split up
There was the design for a machine that would over a million N-95 masks a day which they commissioned but Trump didn't fund
There was the Tea Party refusing to fund building up stockpiles of equipment
Monday morning quarterbacking (and I would quibble with all of those
items, eg Trump did not split up a pandemic response body; he merged 2
bodies. No one lost their job). Yes, in hindsight there are
absolutely things that could have been done. That will always be true.
But the major thing Trump is being blamed for is following the advice
of the WHO. That seems to be true for you, too, Hamish.
People forget that the goal of travel restrictions and stay-in-place
was not to keep individuals from getting Covid-19; it was to ensure
that if they got Covid-19, there would be good medical resources
available to treat them. We have succeeded in that goal, though the
New York area was close.
My inability to articulate what others might have done won't change the
fact that aside from blocking SOME people (not all) from coming in from
China...
...TRUMP DID NOTHING FOR A FULL MONTH.
You know, putting statements in caps doesn't make them magically true.
Your statement is just false, as you undoubtedly know (but are still
willing to say for some reason?). What he did may have been
insufficient, but it was certainly more than NOTHING.
He did nothing with travel restrictions. Note that during February,
WHO was flatly saying that travel restrictions should not be imposed.
It was only on February 29th that they finally suggested that
restrictions might be useful in some circumstances (which still didn't
apply to the US.)
The other major area that could have saved lives was testing. As the
problems at the CDC became more and more apparent, restrictions on outside
labs were loosened throughout the month, until all FDA oversight was removed
by the end of the month. That's not NOTHING.
There were at least 2 federal vaccine efforts started in February. In
addition, Trump requested 2.5 billion from Congress on the 24th - the
Democrats finally got into the act and said we want more (but not for
much that would have had an immediate impact on saving lives). Again,
both amounts insufficient, as became clearer later on, but not
NOTHING.
Both sides seem to be equally adept at exageration.
Chris
I don’t want to get all into this, but are you really
saying that President Trump relied on the wise
guidance of the WHO and made no decisions
of his own? Except of course for, “Here is a test
that you should use for the novel Coronavirus.”
“Oh, no, why ever would we want to do that?”
Chris Buckley
2020-05-27 19:03:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert Carnegie
Post by Chris Buckley
Post by Alan Baker
...TRUMP DID NOTHING FOR A FULL MONTH.
You know, putting statements in caps doesn't make them magically true.
Your statement is just false, as you undoubtedly know (but are still
willing to say for some reason?). What he did may have been
insufficient, but it was certainly more than NOTHING.
He did nothing with travel restrictions. Note that during February,
WHO was flatly saying that travel restrictions should not be imposed.
It was only on February 29th that they finally suggested that
restrictions might be useful in some circumstances (which still didn't
apply to the US.)
The other major area that could have saved lives was testing. As the
problems at the CDC became more and more apparent, restrictions on outside
labs were loosened throughout the month, until all FDA oversight was removed
by the end of the month. That's not NOTHING.
There were at least 2 federal vaccine efforts started in February. In
addition, Trump requested 2.5 billion from Congress on the 24th - the
Democrats finally got into the act and said we want more (but not for
much that would have had an immediate impact on saving lives). Again,
both amounts insufficient, as became clearer later on, but not
NOTHING.
Both sides seem to be equally adept at exageration.
Chris
I don’t want to get all into this, but are you really
saying that President Trump relied on the wise
guidance of the WHO and made no decisions
of his own? Except of course for, “Here is a test
that you should use for the novel Coronavirus.”
“Oh, no, why ever would we want to do that?”
Of course not. But I am disturbed by the constant claims in this
group by people who should know science better, that all this could
have been much improved if Trump hadn't been anti-science and listened
to the scientists.

Pretty much all of Trump's actions and inactions (but perhaps not some
of his ridiculous tweets) for Covid-19 have followed the prevailing
scientific opinions and advice of the time. The problem has been that
he WAS trusting the scientists, and the scientists were wrong. The
scientific advice has been wrong time and time again, from the
quarantining of the cruise ship onwards.

This is not the fault of the scientists. Every bit of full advice I've
seen from reputable scientists has included words to the effect of
"We do not have the evidence to say that this will work for Covid-19. This
is our best advice based on past historical epidemics and what little we
know of Covid-19"

Unfortunately, real-life does not allow policy makers to wait until
scientists do have enough evidence to offer reliable advice, and indeed
the scientists may never have enough evidence, unless the epidemic turns
into a pandemic like this one.

I'm involved in a project that allows me to see both the power and limitations
of science applied to Covid-19. https://ir.nist.gov/covidSubmit/

I am one of (currently) 75 "teams" from around the world that is
investigating how to reliably search for scientific information in a
rapidly changing situation like this, where vocabulary is changing,
where system tuning is challenging, where paper preprints appear and
disappear and there may be half a dozen different versions of same
research. Our document collection is
https://www.semanticscholar.org/cord19
a set of (currently) over 128,000 scientific Covid-19 related papers.
Roughly every 3 weeks we run our systems on a version of that
collection and 30-50 search topics and "compete" to see what
approaches work best.

The growth of articles in the collection is amazing. While some of the
growth (from 40,000 2 months ago) is due to them adding new sources of
documents, there are literally hundreds of new Covid-19 scientific
articles being published every *day*. The Allen Institute just
changed from updating the collection every week to updating it every day.

Covid-19 research is without doubt the most wide-spread intense scientific
investigation that has ever happened, in the history of the world.
So much is being looked at, from local information to global. The power
of science is apparent.

But the limitations are also apparent. Despite all this effort,
scientists do not understand the Covid-19 disease well enough to offer
good advice on what policy should be. There is still not agreement on
such vitally important facts as Morbidity Rate, or Asymptomatic
infection rate. Science is slow, it needs evidence and facts, and
scientists do not yet have those facts.

Unfortunately, there is no magic "pay attention to the science" bullet that
would have solved our Covid-19 problems of the past months or solve the
current dilemmas affecting all our political leaders.

Chris
danny burstein
2020-05-27 19:08:00 UTC
Permalink
In <***@video.sabir.com> Chris Buckley <***@sabir.com> writes:

[snip]
Post by Chris Buckley
I'm involved in a project that allows me to see both the power and limitations
of science applied to Covid-19. https://ir.nist.gov/covidSubmit/
I am one of (currently) 75 "teams" from around the world that is
investigating how to reliably search for scientific information in a
rapidly changing situation like this, where vocabulary is changing,
where system tuning is challenging, where paper preprints appear and
disappear and there may be half a dozen different versions of same
research. Our document collection is
https://www.semanticscholar.org/cord19
a set of (currently) over 128,000 scientific Covid-19 related papers.
Roughly every 3 weeks we run our systems on a version of that
collection and 30-50 search topics and "compete" to see what
approaches work best.
Just a word of advice:

If you go out to lunch and, when you return, discover
that your entire office staff have been murdered,
do not trust anybody.

And keep an eye out for the shoes any letter carriers
are wearing...
--
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
***@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
Lynn McGuire
2020-05-27 21:02:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by danny burstein
[snip]
Post by Chris Buckley
I'm involved in a project that allows me to see both the power and limitations
of science applied to Covid-19. https://ir.nist.gov/covidSubmit/
I am one of (currently) 75 "teams" from around the world that is
investigating how to reliably search for scientific information in a
rapidly changing situation like this, where vocabulary is changing,
where system tuning is challenging, where paper preprints appear and
disappear and there may be half a dozen different versions of same
research. Our document collection is
https://www.semanticscholar.org/cord19
a set of (currently) over 128,000 scientific Covid-19 related papers.
Roughly every 3 weeks we run our systems on a version of that
collection and 30-50 search topics and "compete" to see what
approaches work best.
If you go out to lunch and, when you return, discover
that your entire office staff have been murdered,
do not trust anybody.
And keep an eye out for the shoes any letter carriers
are wearing...
Three Days of the Condor ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Days_of_the_Condor

Good movie.

Lynn
Kevrob
2020-05-27 21:05:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by danny burstein
And keep an eye out for the shoes any letter carriers
are wearing...
Three Days of the Condor ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Days_of_the_Condor
Good movie.
I'll see your 3, and raise you 3!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Days_of_the_Condor

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Lynn McGuire
2020-05-27 21:36:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by danny burstein
And keep an eye out for the shoes any letter carriers
are wearing...
Three Days of the Condor ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Days_of_the_Condor
Good movie.
I'll see your 3, and raise you 3!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Days_of_the_Condor
--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
I never read the book.

Lynn
danny burstein
2020-05-27 21:12:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by danny burstein
And keep an eye out for the shoes any letter carriers
are wearing...
Three Days of the Condor ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Days_of_the_Condor
Good movie.
Ok, judges, can I keep this catch?

(the book name was "Six Days of the Condor",
the movie title was "Three Days", 'cuz
Hollywood and attention spans.)

Oh, one other key difference
(spoiler rot-13'ed):

In the book:
Gur onq thlf, fb gb fcrnx, ner fzhttyvat qehtf

In the movie, it's about oil.
--
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
***@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
Paul S Person
2020-05-28 16:22:34 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 27 May 2020 16:02:44 -0500, Lynn McGuire
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by danny burstein
[snip]
Post by Chris Buckley
I'm involved in a project that allows me to see both the power and limitations
of science applied to Covid-19. https://ir.nist.gov/covidSubmit/
I am one of (currently) 75 "teams" from around the world that is
investigating how to reliably search for scientific information in a
rapidly changing situation like this, where vocabulary is changing,
where system tuning is challenging, where paper preprints appear and
disappear and there may be half a dozen different versions of same
research. Our document collection is
https://www.semanticscholar.org/cord19
a set of (currently) over 128,000 scientific Covid-19 related papers.
Roughly every 3 weeks we run our systems on a version of that
collection and 30-50 search topics and "compete" to see what
approaches work best.
If you go out to lunch and, when you return, discover
that your entire office staff have been murdered,
do not trust anybody.
And keep an eye out for the shoes any letter carriers
are wearing...
Three Days of the Condor ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Days_of_the_Condor
Good movie.
But not nearly as good as the book.

Which had /six/ days, BTW.
--
"I begin to envy Petronius."
"I have envied him long since."
Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha
2020-05-26 20:24:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chris Buckley
IMO the
only reason Trump got elected in the first place was the free
press of TDS, and it's a major reason he might get re-elected.
Trump got elected because he mainpulated the Democrats into
nominating the only candidate he could beat. And I'm pretty sure he
didn't *intend* to win, only to do well enough to enhance the value
of his brand. But Hillary Clinton can't possibly be elected to any
national office, then, now or ever.

He'll get relected because the Democrats have take the current
crisis to who their true colors as fascists willing the stage a
coup to maintain power.
Post by Chris Buckley
The scene in this newsgroup is just as bad; you can't have
discussions here without a certain liberal coterie trying to
shut down the conversations with meaningless insults and
accusations of people desiring other newsgroup members to die.
They're literally not capapble of anything else. They're *so* wrong
that to admit they're wrong would so humiliating that their brains
just break. That's the source of the TDS: emotional trauma so
severe they hallucinate a world more to their liking.
Post by Chris Buckley
People forget that the goal of travel restrictions and
stay-in-place was not to keep individuals from getting Covid-19;
it was to ensure that if they got Covid-19, there would be good
medical resources available to treat them. We have succeeded in
that goal, though the New York area was close.
No, actually, it was never close. They're currently closing make-
shift hospitals set up to handle the overflow that have _never seen
a single patient_ (and whining about having to pay for them). The
hospital ship that Trump sent there had only a handful of patients
before being reassigned as pointless. All the whining was about
getting more money from the feds, not about any medical need.

But the goalposts have shifted, and the True Believers are so lost
in their delusions that they literally cannot remember the original
justification for the lockdown.
--
Terry Austin

Proof that Alan Baker is a liar and a fool, and even stupider than
Lynn:
https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration
(May 2019 total for people arrested for entering the United States
illegally is over 132,000 for just the southwest border.)

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
Major Oz
2020-05-26 23:55:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha
Post by Chris Buckley
IMO the
only reason Trump got elected in the first place was the free
press of TDS, and it's a major reason he might get re-elected.
Trump got elected because he mainpulated the Democrats into
nominating the only candidate he could beat. And I'm pretty sure he
didn't *intend* to win, only to do well enough to enhance the value
of his brand. But Hillary Clinton can't possibly be elected to any
national office, then, now or ever.
He'll get relected because the Democrats have take the current
crisis to who their true colors as fascists willing the stage a
coup to maintain power.
Post by Chris Buckley
The scene in this newsgroup is just as bad; you can't have
discussions here without a certain liberal coterie trying to
shut down the conversations with meaningless insults and
accusations of people desiring other newsgroup members to die.
They're literally not capapble of anything else. They're *so* wrong
that to admit they're wrong would so humiliating that their brains
just break. That's the source of the TDS: emotional trauma so
severe they hallucinate a world more to their liking.
Post by Chris Buckley
People forget that the goal of travel restrictions and
stay-in-place was not to keep individuals from getting Covid-19;
it was to ensure that if they got Covid-19, there would be good
medical resources available to treat them. We have succeeded in
that goal, though the New York area was close.
No, actually, it was never close. They're currently closing make-
shift hospitals set up to handle the overflow that have _never seen
a single patient_ (and whining about having to pay for them). The
hospital ship that Trump sent there had only a handful of patients
before being reassigned as pointless. All the whining was about
getting more money from the feds, not about any medical need.
But the goalposts have shifted, and the True Believers are so lost
in their delusions that they literally cannot remember the original
justification for the lockdown.
.......budda....BOOM!
Dorothy J Heydt
2020-05-27 01:30:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chris Buckley
As I said, I don't defend Trump's often ludicrous statements. I don't
like Trump; I didn't vote for him and won't. But I dislike TDS even
more.
Sorry; I'm too lazy to search back through innumerable posts to
find out: what's TDS?
--
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
www.kithrup.com/~djheydt/
Jay E. Morris
2020-05-27 01:47:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Chris Buckley
As I said, I don't defend Trump's often ludicrous statements. I don't
like Trump; I didn't vote for him and won't. But I dislike TDS even
more.
Sorry; I'm too lazy to search back through innumerable posts to
find out: what's TDS?
Trump Derangement Syndrome
Mike Van Pelt
2020-05-27 22:14:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ninapenda Jibini
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Chris Buckley
As I said, I don't defend Trump's often ludicrous statements. I don't
like Trump; I didn't vote for him and won't. But I dislike TDS even
more.
Sorry; I'm too lazy to search back through innumerable posts to
find out: what's TDS?
Trump Derangement Syndrome
The first letter changes with each president.

It's <President I don't like> Derangement Syndrom, and
extreme partisans on both sides are afflicted with it
during alternate administrations.
--
Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're nuts."
mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out Hurricane
KE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston
Alan Baker
2020-05-27 22:39:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike Van Pelt
Post by Ninapenda Jibini
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Chris Buckley
As I said, I don't defend Trump's often ludicrous statements. I don't
like Trump; I didn't vote for him and won't. But I dislike TDS even
more.
Sorry; I'm too lazy to search back through innumerable posts to
find out: what's TDS?
Trump Derangement Syndrome
The first letter changes with each president.
It's <President I don't like> Derangement Syndrom, and
extreme partisans on both sides are afflicted with it
during alternate administrations.
Actually, no.

There are partisans on BOTH sides who are deranged about whoever is
president.
Peter Trei
2020-05-27 01:51:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Chris Buckley
As I said, I don't defend Trump's often ludicrous statements. I don't
like Trump; I didn't vote for him and won't. But I dislike TDS even
more.
Sorry; I'm too lazy to search back through innumerable posts to
find out: what's TDS?
Donald Trump is a polarizing individual, and many people have strong feelings
about him, pro or con. They often regard those of the other position deluded and irrational.

While both sides are subject to Trump Delusion Syndrome, it it more often heard as
something Trump fans accuse Trump detractors of.

Pt
Dorothy J Heydt
2020-05-27 03:59:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Trei
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Chris Buckley
As I said, I don't defend Trump's often ludicrous statements. I don't
like Trump; I didn't vote for him and won't. But I dislike TDS even
more.
Sorry; I'm too lazy to search back through innumerable posts to
find out: what's TDS?
Donald Trump is a polarizing individual, and many people have strong feelings
about him, pro or con. They often regard those of the other position deluded and irrational.
My dear Peter, I award you the Rasfw Award for Understatement, with
palm leaves.
Post by Peter Trei
While both sides are subject to Trump Delusion Syndrome, it it more often heard as
something Trump fans accuse Trump detractors of.
Figures.
--
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
www.kithrup.com/~djheydt/
Scott Lurndal
2020-05-27 13:56:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Chris Buckley
As I said, I don't defend Trump's often ludicrous statements. I don't
like Trump; I didn't vote for him and won't. But I dislike TDS even
more.
Sorry; I'm too lazy to search back through innumerable posts to
find out: what's TDS?
A derogotory term invented by trump supporters to label anyone that
doesn't support trump, of course.

Nothing to see here other than bile and hate.
Kevrob
2020-05-27 15:49:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scott Lurndal
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Chris Buckley
As I said, I don't defend Trump's often ludicrous statements. I don't
like Trump; I didn't vote for him and won't. But I dislike TDS even
more.
Sorry; I'm too lazy to search back through innumerable posts to
find out: what's TDS?
A derogotory term invented by trump supporters to label anyone that
doesn't support trump, of course.
Nothing to see here other than bile and hate.
It has become [Fill-in the President's name here] Derangement
Syndrome. The Birthers had ODS and those who were convinced Al
Gore won Florida had BDS. { see

https://www.politico.com/story/2008/12/get-over-obama-derangement-syndrome-016306 }

I vote for neither Team Red nor Team Blue, so the enraged
zealotry comes off, to me, as "bi-partisan.

Kevin R
Paul S Person
2020-05-27 17:04:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scott Lurndal
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Chris Buckley
As I said, I don't defend Trump's often ludicrous statements. I don't
like Trump; I didn't vote for him and won't. But I dislike TDS even
more.
Sorry; I'm too lazy to search back through innumerable posts to
find out: what's TDS?
A derogotory term invented by trump supporters to label anyone that
doesn't support trump, of course.
Nothing to see here other than bile and hate.
And projection: the supporters are deranged, so they project that on
detractors.
--
"I begin to envy Petronius."
"I have envied him long since."
BCFD36
2020-05-27 20:48:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Chris Buckley
Monday morning quarterbacking.
We are "blessed" in this country with a very adversarial political
setup. Please give me the dates that, say, Biden said we should close
down the country (or take other concrete action). Or Pelosi? Or Schumer?
Well you might want to check the pandemic response plan prepared under Obama
Trump Jan 22
"We have it totally under control. It's one person coming in from China. We have it under control. It's going to be just fine."
Feb 1
"The Democrats are politicizing the coronavirus. You know that, right?...
They tried the impeachment hoax. That was on a perfect conversation and this is their new hoax."
Mar 7
"What a problem. Came out of nowhere, but we're taking care of it...
And in terms of deaths, I don't know what the count is today. Is it 11? Eleven people? And in terms of cases, it's very, very few. When you look at other countries, it's a very tiny fraction because we've been very strong at the borders."
"They have the tests. And the tests are beautiful. Anybody that needs a test gets a test...
I like the numbers [of reported US coronavirus cases] being where they are. I don't need to have the numbers double because of one ship [the Grand Princess cruise ship docked in San Francisco with 21 confirmed coronavirus cases on board at the time]."
Mar 10
"And we're prepared, and we're doing a great job with it. And it will go away. Just stay calm. It will go away...
The consumer has never been in a better position than they are right now."
Biden
Jan 27
"...The outbreak of a new coronavirus, which has already infected more than 2,700 people and killed over 80 in China, will get worse before it gets better. Cases have been confirmed in a dozen countries, with at least five in the United States. There will likely be more."
Feb 1
"We are in the midst of a crisis with the coronavirus. We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump's record of hysteria, xenophobia, and fear-mongering. He is the worst possible person to lead our country through a global health emergency."
Feb 28
"No one takes the president's word for these things. He, at a minimum, exaggerates everything. And the idea that he's going to stand there and say, ‘everything is fine, don't worry,' who's going to believe that? Let the experts speak like we did in our administration."
Mar 1
"We knew that this was coming. Back as far as January. They didn't even begin to prepare the testing kits...
Donald Trump said just several days ago this was a Democratic hoax. What in God's name is he talking about? Has he no shame?"
"They have eliminated the office we set up -- we set up in the president's office to deal with pandemic diseases."
Feb 26
"Too little, too late," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said of the president's emergency funding request Monday. "We've seen no sign that President Trump has any plan or urgency to deal with the spread of the coronavirus — we need real leadership and we need it fast."
"Americans need a coordinated, fully-funded, whole-of-government response to keep them and their loved ones safe," Pelosi said in a statement late Monday. "The President's request for coronavirus response funding is long overdue and completely inadequate to the scale of this emergency."
She said the Democratic-majority House of Representatives will work quickly to move their own funding package that "fully addresses the scale and seriousness of this public health crisis."
Post by Chris Buckley
There was no demand by the Democrats for anything helpful.
Bullshit
Post by Chris Buckley
They only
started to advocate for a national lockdown at the end of March.
Earlier action would have stopped the need for a lockdown.
Post by Chris Buckley
The
only consensus I remember of the Democrats was that Trump's thoughts
of quarantining the New York area were absolutely unacceptable and
illegal (ignoring the fact that a national lockdown is just as
illegal).
Considering your lack of memory I don't see your assessment of what was asked for worth considering or your assessment of the legality
Post by Chris Buckley
Trump's tweets and speeches are often ludicrous and that is an important
part of a President's responsibility that he is failing. And he made major
He trusted the scientists at WHO much too long in their early
statements that travel restictions should not happen.
You might want to check what they actually said
Post by Chris Buckley
They took an
inordinate amount of time to back off those statements. (WHO was
still advising against travel restrictions on February 29, but said
perhaps in certain circumstances such as settings with few
international connections and limited response capabilities.)
He trusted the scientists at CDC much too long as they had assumed the
responsibility of developing, certifying, and deploying a testing
program (as they had done in the previous recent epidemics).
Largely due to Trump's political appointees wanting to reward donors and sidelining the actual science people
Post by Chris Buckley
Note that
CDC is now not leading the efforts in the antibody tests and vaccines,
which has meant some chaos, but lots of options being pursued in
parallel.
But these are mistakes in hindsight. I trust the Democrats to point
out Trump's mistakes, and I can remember no consensus for action from
them at the time that would have affected things (they did demand that
Trump order the car companies to produce ventilators, but by then the
future supply of ventilators was already assured enough). What are
you remembering differently?
Well for a start there was a pandemic response plan
Early on was to check for PPE and incubators
There was the pandemic response body which Trump split up
There was the design for a machine that would over a million N-95 masks a day which they commissioned but Trump didn't fund
There was the Tea Party refusing to fund building up stockpiles of equipment
You are so full of it!!! Presenting things that were actually said, it
is just not done. You are not bowing to the Trumpenfurer.
--
Dave Scruggs
Captain, Boulder Creek Fire (Retired)
Sr. Software Engineer - Stellar Solutions (Probably Retired)
Ninapenda Jibini
2020-05-26 00:10:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Major Oz
Post by J. Clarke
I'm getting tired of this assertion that bleach and the like
were "recommended by the President". He's a stupid ignorant
man, he asked a stupid ignorant question. Note--he _asked_.
He did not say "this is the cure", he did not say "take this,
people of America", he said "is there any way to use this",
directing someone off-camera to check it out.
Blame people for what they do, not what others claim they do.
The thing he did wrong was speculating on-camera.
There has been a plague infesting the nation since Trump's
election.
Indeed, there has. It's called Trump Derangement Syndrome.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_derangement_syndrome
Post by Major Oz
Best described by beleeeeving what someone said about what he
said.....rather than what he said.
It gets modified by what the media wishes you to beleeeeve.
I am exceedingly satisfied with what he has DONE, and don't give
a ration of shit about what he says.
You and a 36 million other people who will remember who destroyed
their livelihoods come November, with, apparently, no positive
gain.
--
Terry Austin

Proof that Alan Baker is a liar and a fool, and even stupider than
Lynn:
https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration


"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
Alan Baker
2020-05-26 00:35:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ninapenda Jibini
Post by Major Oz
Post by J. Clarke
I'm getting tired of this assertion that bleach and the like
were "recommended by the President". He's a stupid ignorant
man, he asked a stupid ignorant question. Note--he _asked_.
He did not say "this is the cure", he did not say "take this,
people of America", he said "is there any way to use this",
directing someone off-camera to check it out.
Blame people for what they do, not what others claim they do.
The thing he did wrong was speculating on-camera.
There has been a plague infesting the nation since Trump's
election.
Indeed, there has. It's called Trump Derangement Syndrome.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_derangement_syndrome
Post by Major Oz
Best described by beleeeeving what someone said about what he
said.....rather than what he said.
It gets modified by what the media wishes you to beleeeeve.
I am exceedingly satisfied with what he has DONE, and don't give
a ration of shit about what he says.
You and a 36 million other people who will remember who destroyed
their livelihoods come November, with, apparently, no positive
gain.
How about a couple of 100,000 NOT dead...
Alan Baker
2020-05-25 23:14:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Clarke
Post by James Nicoll
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by James Nicoll
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Jack Bohn
Post by Alan Baker
<https://rt.live/>
Check out how they were doing 4 weeks ago versus today.
They were beginning an upward trend, that they are now turning around?
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/texas/
7,500 new cases in the last week from 48,677 to 56,166
Active cases at their highest level yet
Presumably, all that's needed is to supply Texans with jugs of bleach
and anally inserted UVs lights and the percentage of fatalities due to
C19 will drop right off.
Balanced by the rising number of fatalities due to what you just
described.
Isn't dying because one used treatements recommended by the President
treason? I am sure it must be. Probably bleach chuggers who died weren't
right with Jesus.
I'm getting tired of this assertion that bleach and the like were
"recommended by the President". He's a stupid ignorant man, he asked
a stupid ignorant question. Note--he _asked_. He did not say "this
is the cure", he did not say "take this, people of America", he said
"is there any way to use this", directing someone off-camera to check
it out.
He unequivocally DID recommend hydroxychloroquine...
Ninapenda Jibini
2020-05-26 00:09:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Clarke
Post by James Nicoll
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
In article
On Monday, May 25, 2020 at 9:00:23 PM UTC+10, Jack Bohn
Post by Jack Bohn
<https://rt.live/> 
Check out how they were doing 4 weeks ago versus today.
They were beginning an upward trend, that they are now
turning around?
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/texas/
7,500 new cases in the last week from 48,677 to 56,166
Active cases at their highest level yet
Presumably, all that's needed is to supply Texans with jugs of
bleach and anally inserted UVs lights and the percentage of
fatalities due to C19 will drop right off.
Balanced by the rising number of fatalities due to what you
just described.
Isn't dying because one used treatements recommended by the
President treason? I am sure it must be. Probably bleach
chuggers who died weren't right with Jesus.
I'm getting tired of this assertion that bleach and the like
were "recommended by the President". He's a stupid ignorant
man, he asked a stupid ignorant question. Note--he _asked_. He
did not say "this is the cure", he did not say "take this,
people of America", he said "is there any way to use this",
directing someone off-camera to check it out.
Blame people for what they do, not what others claim they do.
The thing he did wrong was speculating on-camera.
The thing he did wrong was talking to the press, which he has known
for decades will simply lie about everyting in their neverending
propaganda. Of course, if the doesn't talk to them, they'll lie
anyway.
--
Terry Austin

Proof that Alan Baker is a liar and a fool, and even stupider than
Lynn:
https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration


"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
Alan Baker
2020-05-26 00:35:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ninapenda Jibini
Post by J. Clarke
Post by James Nicoll
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
In article
On Monday, May 25, 2020 at 9:00:23 PM UTC+10, Jack Bohn
Post by Jack Bohn
<https://rt.live/>Â
Check out how they were doing 4 weeks ago versus today.
They were beginning an upward trend, that they are now
turning around?
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/texas/
7,500 new cases in the last week from 48,677 to 56,166
Active cases at their highest level yet
Presumably, all that's needed is to supply Texans with jugs of
bleach and anally inserted UVs lights and the percentage of
fatalities due to C19 will drop right off.
Balanced by the rising number of fatalities due to what you
just described.
Isn't dying because one used treatements recommended by the
President treason? I am sure it must be. Probably bleach
chuggers who died weren't right with Jesus.
I'm getting tired of this assertion that bleach and the like
were "recommended by the President". He's a stupid ignorant
man, he asked a stupid ignorant question. Note--he _asked_. He
did not say "this is the cure", he did not say "take this,
people of America", he said "is there any way to use this",
directing someone off-camera to check it out.
Blame people for what they do, not what others claim they do.
The thing he did wrong was speculating on-camera.
The thing he did wrong was talking to the press, which he has known
for decades will simply lie about everyting in their neverending
propaganda. Of course, if the doesn't talk to them, they'll lie
anyway.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Mike Van Pelt
2020-05-27 22:00:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Clarke
I'm getting tired of this assertion that bleach and the like were
"recommended by the President". He's a stupid ignorant man, he asked
a stupid ignorant question. Note--he _asked_. He did not say "this
is the cure", he did not say "take this, people of America", he said
"is there any way to use this", directing someone off-camera to check
it out.
Blame people for what they do, not what others claim they do.
The thing he did wrong was speculating on-camera.
Bingo.

There's so much fake crap being spewed in all directions
about Trump that it's causing me to doubt the reality of
the real crap I knew before ... or thought I did.

Doubtless, another insidious Russian plot.
--
Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're nuts."
mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out Hurricane
KE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston
Ninapenda Jibini
2020-05-26 00:07:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Nicoll
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
In article
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Jack Bohn
<https://rt.live/> 
Check out how they were doing 4 weeks ago versus today.
They were beginning an upward trend, that they are now
turning around?
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/texas/
7,500 new cases in the last week from 48,677 to 56,166
Active cases at their highest level yet
Presumably, all that's needed is to supply Texans with jugs of
bleach and anally inserted UVs lights and the percentage of
fatalities due to C19 will drop right off.
Balanced by the rising number of fatalities due to what you just
described.
Isn't dying because one used treatements recommended by the
President treason? I am sure it must be. Probably bleach
chuggers who died weren't right with Jesus.
Typical delusional BS from Jimmie, as he was instructed by his
masters.
--
Terry Austin

Proof that Alan Baker is a liar and a fool, and even stupider than
Lynn:
https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration


"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
Loading...