Sean Busbey
2015-06-30 19:08:45 UTC
(I took the liberty of moving us off of Ted's feature discussion thread)
A three month ban sounds better than a permanent ban. But it still seems
likely to just result in the ban-ee walking away from teh community or
escalating.
Would we consider enforcing moderation on posts for the three month period
instead of an outright ban?
It's more work for whomever has moderator rights on the mailing list, but
it provides a better feedback cycle for improved behavior. Presuming that I
don't already have such access as a PMC member, I'd be willing to volunteer
to help take on part of the burden.
-Sean
A three month ban sounds better than a permanent ban. But it still seems
likely to just result in the ban-ee walking away from teh community or
escalating.
Would we consider enforcing moderation on posts for the three month period
instead of an outright ban?
It's more work for whomever has moderator rights on the mailing list, but
it provides a better feedback cycle for improved behavior. Presuming that I
don't already have such access as a PMC member, I'd be willing to volunteer
to help take on part of the burden.
-Sean
It was suggested privately that we try a temporary ban first, to be clear
that current behavior and communication is unacceptable and won't be
tolerated further, yet allow for the possibility of a return to the
community should the message be received. So let me amend my proposal - a
three month temporary ban.
Also, the reason I am asking for public feedback before calling for a vote
is this would be the first time in the history of the project we would take
this very unfortunate step. It pains me personally but enough is enough, in
my opinion. However, if you are not comfortable with that then please speak
up and I won't ask the PMC to vote on this.
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
that current behavior and communication is unacceptable and won't be
tolerated further, yet allow for the possibility of a return to the
community should the message be received. So let me amend my proposal - a
three month temporary ban.
Also, the reason I am asking for public feedback before calling for a vote
is this would be the first time in the history of the project we would take
this very unfortunate step. It pains me personally but enough is enough, in
my opinion. However, if you are not comfortable with that then please speak
up and I won't ask the PMC to vote on this.
I've had enough and would like to ask the user and dev communities if
theywould mind if we vote on a permanent ban of Michael Segal - any and all
email accounts he may choose to set up - from all HBase mailing lists.
Theemail accounts he may choose to set up - from all HBase mailing lists.
basic lack of courtesy and constant naysaying is corrosive. Nobody trying
to volunteer their time here deserves his continuing abuse.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Michael Segel <
--to volunteer their time here deserves his continuing abuse.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Michael Segel <
Sean,
Youâre a developer, or just some higher level primate that pounds code?
I donât want to embarrass you, but what do they teach in engineering
schools these days?
Youâre a developer, or just some higher level primate that pounds code?
I donât want to embarrass you, but what do they teach in engineering
schools these days?
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
--
Sean
Sean