Post by Râ¼dPost by MattBPost by Râ¼dPost by MattBPost by Râ¼dPost by MattBPost by Patrick BPost by MattBPost by Patrick BPost by MattBOn Wed, 2 May 2018 19:56:47 -0000 (UTC), "Leroy N. Soetoro"
Post by Leroy N. Soetorohttps://www.washingtonpost.com/world/cardinal-george-pell-will-face-trial-
on-historical-sex-offense-charges/2018/05/01/76adb5a8-4cf1-11e8-af46-
b1d6dc0d9bfe_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.31066951ae48
SYDNEY — Cardinal George Pell was ordered by an Australian magistrate to
face trial over sexual abuse allegations, a decision that may make him the
most senior Roman Catholic prelate to be forced to defend himself in court
over a scandal that has swept through Catholic communities around the
world.
After being told in a courtroom that he would face trial, Pell was asked
how he pleaded. “Not guilty,” the 76-year-old answered in a firm, loud
voice, according to reporters present.
Pell rose through the ranks of the church in Australia to become
archbishop of Melbourne and Sydney. Five years ago, he was appointed one
of eight cardinals by Pope Francis to work out how to overhaul the
administrative structures of the church, which are known as the Roman
curia. The following year he was placed in charge of the Vatican’s
economic affairs. He has taken a leave of absence for the court case.
After a month-long pretrial hearing in which Pell was defended by one of
Australia’s top criminal lawyers, the magistrate, Belinda Wallington,
dismissed some of the more serious assault charges made against Pell by
the Victoria state police force.
She ruled that other charges would go ahead: that Pell groped two boys’
genitals at a swimming pool in the regional city of Ballarat in the 1970s,
where he was born, and ordained in 1966; and assaulted two choristers at
Melbourne’s St. Patrick’s Cathedral when he was the city’s archbishop in
the 1990s.
Because the allegations concern offenses against children, most of the
details have been legally suppressed and the court was closed to the
public during part of the pretrial hearing.
“Cardinal George Pell has at all times fully cooperated with Victoria
Police and always and steadfastly maintained his innocence,” a statement
from his lawyers said. “He has voluntarily returned to Australia to meet
these accusations. He will defend the remaining charges.”
A conviction is far from certain. Pell’s lawyers are likely to seek to
undermine prosecution witnesses. The long time it took for the cases to
reach court could work in Pell’s favor by dimming the memory of those
called to give evidence.
“These are very difficult matters for everyone involved and no one is
going to be popping champagne corks over this,” Louise Milligan, an
investigative journalist and witness in the case whose reporting uncovered
some of Pell’s accusers, said in a telephone interview.
Pell has apologized for the pain inflicted upon the church’s victims, and
church officials say he became the first Catholic bishop, in 1996, to
institute a formal restitution program.
But his patrician manner and perceived lack of empathy toward victims
under his watch made Pell the focus of much anger in the disgruntled
Catholic community.
A five-year national judicial inquiry into institutional sexual abuse that
concluded last year received more complaints about the Catholic Church
than any other organization. Ballarat was a hot spot of abuse: 140 people
told the inquiry they were abused there between 1980 and 2015.
Those who complained usually received a dismissive response. Church
leaders settled allegations in favor of the priests, or moved them to
another district where several were able to continue abusing children, the
inquiry found.
“This case study exposed a catastrophic failure in the leadership of the
Diocese and ultimately in the structure and culture of the Church over
decades to effectively respond to the sexual abuse of children by its
priests,” the inquiry said last December.
During the pretrial hearing, Pell’s lawyer challenged the reliability of
witnesses’ memories and their psychological states. At one point, the
lawyer, Robert Richter, accused the magistrate of bias and asked her to
step down from the case. She declined.
On Tuesday, the hearing’s final day, the courtroom was packed with victim
advocates, Pell’s supporters and journalists. After the magistrate read
the judgment and left the room, there was clapping from the public section
of the court.
As Pell walked from the building on bail, through a phalanx of police
officers there to protect him, he was jeered.
Jeer him? He will excommunicate them all.
Why would he do that?
Why would the Cardinal in any way shape or form aid Pedophiles of help
in a cover up? Cardinal is evil or insane.
If he is guilty...
However, I have said for a few years now that Pell will not spend a
day in prison. I still stand by that claim. There will be no real
proof offered.
So your gift is prophesying.
1 John 4:1
4 Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to
see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone
out into the world.
Matthew 7:21-23
21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom
of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in
heaven. 22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not
prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your
name perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I
never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’
John 5:24. Those who have accepted Jesus the Christ and His words
and believed on the Father that sent Him have already passed from
death to life and will NOT come into condemnation.
So what is the will of God? The entire scriptures tell you what the
will of God is, and it begins with accepting Jesus Christ as savior.
True and then Churches dissect the Bible take it out of Context and
make up more rules, rules that require a Church, Purgatory is a
example.
Post by Râ¼dPatrick and Duke are two of those that have already passed from death
to life because they accepted Jesus and believe on the Father that
sent Him.
If you say so and yet they defend pedophiles so guess you are saying
pedophile Priest are good as they "have accepted Jesus and believe on
the Father that sent Him." Please do not tell me you believe just
because someone has "accepted Jesus" they can abuse children?
Post by Râ¼dThe word of God is absolute. Men over the years have tried to monkey
with it and got no where.
God's word is not limited to a book and God would not be limited by
the understanding of men of the times.
Post by Râ¼dPost by MattBThat you would be prophesying in the defense of Pedophilia along with
others is not a surprise to me.
Cardinal Pell has not been convicted, and therefore Patrick is not
defending a pedophile. Innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable
doubt, Matt.
Thou shalt not bear false witness.
1 Ti 5:19
1Pe_3:9 Not rendering evil for evil, nor railing for railing, but
contrariwise, blessing: for unto this are you called, that you may
inherit a blessing.
2Pe_2:11 Whereas angels, who are greater in strength and power, bring
not against themselves a railing judgment.
Jud_1:9 When Michael the archangel, disputing with the devil, contended
about the body of Moses, he durst not bring against him the judgment of
railing speech, but said: The Lord command thee.
Post by MattBTo you and those like you I say Away
from me, you evildoers!’.
2Peter_2:11 Whereas angels, who are greater in strength and power,
bring not against themselves a railing judgment.
Post by MattBPedophilia is not a sin to you and those that support you, and yet I
believe to God it is a Sin.
Pedophilia is a sin, but so is calling someone a pedophile
before you have evidence of guilt, because if you are wrong
then you have borne false witness.
Yet you seem to support Patrick's lies here?? That would make you to
God what?
\
What part of "thou shalt not bear false witness" do you not understand?
Talk to Patrick about that.
Post by Râ¼dMatt, it would be the same thing as me accusing you of murder
and condemning you for it without having evidence of your guilt!
Why is it that you don't understand this?
I understand what you are saying. I do not write the articles and
will not take part of a cover up.
But you have in previous posts called Cardinal Pell a "pedophile"
when he hasn't been convicted by a court of Pedophilia! He could
be found innocent by the court. You have to PROVE people are guilty,
you cannot just call them anything you please and automatically they
are guilty. it doesn't work that way.
He hasn’t been convicted of treason either but that ought not prevent us
from calling his actions seditious...
Post by Râ¼dPost by MattBArticle says "Cardinal George Pell will face trial " You saying he is
above needing to go to a trail?
Did I say that anywhere? Show me where I have even hinted at such
a thing.
Post by MattBYou need to read what I post not what pedo defender Patrick Barker
says I post.
I have read what you have said. You are convicting the Cardinal of
pedophilia without a trial.
— KARL MARX 200TH ANNIVERSARY: THE WORLD IS FINALLY READY FOR MARXISM AS
CAPITALISM REACHES THE TIPPING POINT
(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 May 2018
YOUSSEF EL-GINGIHY (THE INDEPENDENT) @ 2300 HOURS (BST) ON 4 MAY 2018: “The
philosopher Karl Marx (5 May 1818 - 14 March 1883) predicted that
centralisation would lead to revolution and give birth to a
post-capitalist society – globalisation has led us to that point.”
<https://www.independent.co.uk/news/long_reads/karl-marx-anniversary-a8334241.html>
The following ideas on HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] were expressed {
G2089@{
#1: Sup: 5; Ego: 5,
#2: Sup: 62; Ego: 57,
#3: Sup: 72; Ego: 10,
Male: #139; Feme: #72
} // #315
#315 as [#5, #300, #10] = eti (G2089): {#14 as #315} 1) yet, still; 1a) of
time; 1a1) of a thing which went on formerly, whereas now a different state
of things exists or has begun to exist; 1a2) of a thing which continues at
present; 1a2a) even, now; 1a3) with negatives; 1a3a) no longer, no more;
1b) of degree and increase; 1b1) even, yet; 1b2) besides, more, further;
H560@{
#1: Sup: 30; Ego: 30,
#2: Sup: 70; Ego: 40,
#3: Sup: 71; Ego: 1,
#4: Sup: 30; Ego: 40,
#5: Sup: 68; Ego: 38,
Male: #269; Feme: #149
} // #311
#311 as [#30, #40, #1, #40, #200] = 'amar (Aramaic) (H560): {#2 as #241} 1)
(P'al) to say, to speak, to command, to tell, to relate;
} some 100 years (if not millennia) earlier than Karl Marx.
Nous: #8
Time: 05:35 hrs
Date: 2018.6.14
Torah: [#30, #1, #6]@{
#1: Sup: 30; Ego: 30,
#2: Sup: 31; Ego: 1,
#3: Sup: 37; Ego: 6,
Male: #98; Feme: #37
} // #37
Dao: Worth of Water, Easy By Nature
Tetra: #40 - Law/Model
I-Ching: H48 - The Well, Welling
Latin: Deprecabilis {Admirable God} Alt: Dambyah {Flowing Blood of God} {
1. AIDS REFRESHING NIGHT-TIME SLEEP, AGAINST SADNESS
2. THE HIGH SCIENCES, MARVELOUS DISCOVERIES
3. MUSICIANS, POETS, LITERATURE & PHILOSOPHY
4. Phuor
}
Serug {Branch, Layer; twining}
Transformative Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#315 / #311} / HETEROS {#261 / #284}
<http://www.grapple369.com?time:5.37>
***@zen: 4, row: 3, col: 3, nous: 8 [Super: #315 / #24 - Important
Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay,
Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting, Ego: #311 /
#8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 - The Well, Welling;
Tetra: 40 - Law/Model]
But what if the paradigm of thinking as Immanuel Kant (22 April 1724 – 12
February 1804) postulates within his Critique of Pure Reason (1781 / 1787)
as the trinomial mathematical theoretical noumenon was the basis of
governance?
I QUOTE: "In the third chapter of the "Analytic of Principles," on
phenomena and noumena, Kant in Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and second
edition 1787) emphasizes that because the categories must always be applied
to data provided by sensibility in order to provide cognition, and because
the data of sensibility are structured by the transcendentally ideal forms
of intuition, the categories give us knowledge only of things as they
appear with sensibility ("phenomena," literally "that which appears").
Although through pure understanding (nous in Greek) we may think of objects
independently of their being given in sensibility, we can never cognize
them as such non-sensible entities ("noumena," literally "that which is
thought" as a subject of some 112 mentions). The meaning of Kant's use of
the term "phenomena" is self-evident, but the meaning of "noumena" is not,
since it literally means not "things as they are in dependently of
appearing to us" but something more like "things as they are understood by
pure thought." Yet Kant appears to deny that the human understanding can
comprehend things in the latter way."
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>
*THUS* *I* *AM* *PROFFERING* *AN* *INFORMED* *AND* *REASONED* *OPINION*
*AS* *THAT* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL* *KANT* *STATES* *IS* *AN* *IMPOSSIBILITY*
*FOR* *A* *HUMAN* *BEING* *TO* *ACCOMPLISH* *BY* *TRANSCENDENT*
*SAPIENTIAL* *THOUGHT* *AND* *CAPABLY* *DEMONSTRATE* *IT'S* *TEMPORAL*
*CONGRUENCE* *AS* *COHERENCE* *BY* *A* *MATHEMATICAL* *THEORETICAL*
*NOUMENON* *AS* *AN* *INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL* *KANT*
*HIMSELF* *CALLS* *NOUMENA* *AS* *THE* *PROOF* *OF* *A* *VALID* *AND*
*RATIONAL* *CONCEPT* *ATTAINED* *BY* *PURE* *THOUGHT*.
FOR EXAMPLE:
Here is a poem written at 0857 hours that is directly associated by
temporal relativity to the noumena conveying two explicit CATEGORIES OF
UNDERSTANDING that whilst linguistically HEBREW / GREEK {ie. 24 x 7 x 13 =
#2,184 / #364 = 6D as ‘OTH being a cosmological anthropic principle
defining ratiocination: 22 / 7} operate as an equivalent of electronic STEM
cells by which DYNAMIC NATURAL ASSOCIATIONS occur as fostering of IDEAS
with other media types.
That the CATEGORIES are then redacted to their bifurcation of male / feme
pairing so as to ascertain the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE instruction set substrata
relationship and its OSMOSIS intersection points to the noumena operation
of MIND by the dialectic of INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS:
— FINE AND DANDY —
“MY HAIR IS NEVER A MESS.
JUST NUMBER TWO WAHL.
I LOVE 💕 WASH AND WEAR.
IT’S SO EASY TO BARBER.
AND I MUST CONFESS.
THERE’S NO EYES KOHL.
BEING BLONDE ‘N FAIR.
THE LOOK TO HARBOUR.”
H1548@{
#1: Sup: 5; Ego: 5,
#2: Sup: 81; Ego: 76,
#3: Sup: 3; Ego: 3,
#4: Sup: 33; Ego: 30,
#5: Sup: 41; Ego: 8,
#6: Sup: 47; Ego: 6,
Male: #210; Feme: #128
} // #452
#452 as [#5, #400, #3, #30, #8, #6] = galach (H1548): {#2 as #41} 1) to
poll, shave, shave off, be bald; 1a) (Piel); 1a1) to shave; 1a2) to shave
off; 1a3) (fig. of devastation); 1b) (Pual) to be shaven; 1c) (Hithpael) to
shave oneself;
G3659@{
#1: Sup: 70; Ego: 70,
#2: Sup: 29; Ego: 40,
#3: Sup: 69; Ego: 40,
#4: Sup: 70; Ego: 1,
#5: Sup: 46; Ego: 57,
#6: Sup: 47; Ego: 1,
Male: #331; Feme: #209
} // #452
#452 as [#70, #40, #40, #1, #300, #1] = omma (G3659): {#15 as #151} 1) an
eye;
Nous: #31
Time: 08:55 hrs
Date: 2018.8.5
Torah: [#10, #200, #400]@{
#1: Sup: 10; Ego: 10,
#2: Sup: 48; Ego: 38,
#3: Sup: 43; Ego: 76,
Male: #101; Feme: #124
} // #610
Dao: Military Stratagem, Quelling War
Tetra: #51 - Constancy
I-Ching: H32 - Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy
Latin: Spes {God who punishes the wicked} Alt: Saitel {Roaming of God} {
1. PROTECTS AGAINST UNJUST ATTACKS, CONFOUNDING ONE'S ENEMIES
2. PROPAGATES LIGHT, CIVILISATION & LIBERTY
3. PEACE, JUSTICE, SCIENCES & THE ARTS
4. Hepe
}
Solar Eclipse: 4 December 2002 (AEST) + 28 years
Amminadab {My people is liberal}
Transformative Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#344 / #452} / HETEROS {#326 / #443}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?time:8.57>
***@zen: 4, row: 4, col: 5, nous: 31 [Super: #344 / #77 - Natural
Guide, Heaven's Reason; I-Ching: H12 - Obstruction, Standstill
(stagnation), Selfish persons; Tetra: 57 - Guardedness, Ego: #452 / #31 -
Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 - Perseverance, Endurance,
Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy]
H7140@{
#1: Sup: 6; Ego: 6,
#2: Sup: 36; Ego: 30,
#3: Sup: 55; Ego: 19,
#4: Sup: 12; Ego: 38,
#5: Sup: 20; Ego: 8,
Male: #129; Feme: #101
} // #344
YOUTUBE: “Ice Ice Baby (Vanilla Ice)”
#344 as [#6, #30, #100, #200, #8] = qerach (H7140): {#10 as #308} 1) frost,
ice, ice crystal; 1a) frost (of night); 1b) *ICE*;
FACEBOOK VIDEO: "Block of ice falling from sky terrifies London street
cleaner"
<https://www.facebook.com/TheIndependentOnline/videos/10155989843921636/>
G716@{
#1: Sup: 1; Ego: 1,
#2: Sup: 20; Ego: 19,
#3: Sup: 60; Ego: 40,
#4: Sup: 61; Ego: 1,
#5: Sup: 37; Ego: 57,
#6: Sup: 47; Ego: 10,
Male: #226; Feme: #128
} // #452
YOUTUBE: “The Horses 🐎 (Daryl Braithwaite)
#452 as [#1, #100, #40, #1, #300, #10] = harma (G716): {#12 as #142} 1) a
chariot; 2) of war *CHARIOTS* (ie. armed with scythes); 3) chariots (drawn
with many horses);
That it is then the time and deterministic opportunity for a #391 - HOMOIOS
dispensation as the sapient global artificial intelligence knowledge
economy ... {#311 as [#6, #5, #200, #20, #30, #10, #40] = rakal (H7402):
{#14 as #250} 1) to go about (meaning dubious); 1a) (Qal) trafficker,
trader (participle) (subst)}
"Beside that he had of the merchantmen, and of the traffic of the spice
{rakal-merchant [H7402]: #311} merchants {rakal-merchant [H7402]: #311},
and of all the kings of Arabia, and of the governors of the country."
[1Kings 10:15]
YOUTUBE: "He who controls the Spice...!"
“Thou hast multiplied thy merchants {rakal-merchant [H7402]: #311} above
the stars of heaven: the cankerworm spoileth, and fleeth away." [Nahum
3:16]
FIRSTLY I AM GOING TO SELF-DESCRIBE THE COGNITIVE PROCESS BY PROPOSITION OF
A HYPOTHETICAL Y-M-T-A MODEL WHICH I EQUALLY APPLY TO CHROMOSOMES:
#YOD - IS THE #CENTRE OF REALITY AS THE BEGINNING OF A WORD
#MEM - IS THE DELIMITATION OF ANY COGNITIVE EVENT AS THE ENDING OF A WORD
#TAU - IS THE CIRCUMSCRIBING OF ANY REALITY EVENT WHEREBY THE PROCESS AS
DISAMBIGUATION OF A WORD OCCURS
#ALEPH - IS THEN THE NEUROLOGICAL STREAMING OF THE COMPREHENSION
<
Loading Image...
>
[IMAGE: The eye {Y-M-T-A} glyph]
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was
God.
The same was in the beginning with God.
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that
was made.
In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.”
[John 1:1-5 (KJV)]
Most readers would realise that our Y-M-T-A model applies equally to the
New York / Pentagon TERRORIST EVENT of 11 September 2001:
STOICHEION OF THE KOSMOS
#YOD - IS THE #CENTRE OF REALITY IN SOVEREIGNTY AS OUR PRIME MINISTER JOHN
HOWARD IN NEW YORK ON 10 SEPTEMBER 2001 as HEAVEN {Divine GODHEAD which is
the Mind of Christ as *HYPOSTATIS*} +
#MEM - IS THE DELIMITATION OF ANY COGNITIVE EVENT AS THE CUSTODIAL SEIZURE
OF #41 - CENTRE {#6000 % 22 = 13} ON 13 SEPTEMBER 2001 as EARTH {DAO-ziran
(Chinese) / COURSE-trochos (Greek) OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]} +
#TAU - IS THE CIRCUMSCRIBING OF ANY REALITY EVENT AS EQUINOX @ 2305 HOURS
(GMT) UPON 22 SEPTEMBER 2001 as MAN {HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T]} +
<http://www.grapple369.com/?time:23.5>
***@zen: 2, row: 9, col: 8, nous: 1 [Super: #349 / #6 - Female
Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching: H25 - No Errancy, Without
Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 - Departure, Ego: #235 / #1 -
To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation; I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake;
Tetra: 24 - Joy]
#ALEPH - IS THEN THE #REPRISE OF THE WEEK UPON SUNDAY AS 23 SEPTEMBER 2001
{23 CHROMOSOME ELEMENTS AS THEORY OF GENDER}
“Then the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said,
Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?
Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer
thou me.
Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou
hast understanding.
Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched
the line upon it?
Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner
stone thereof;
When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for
joy?
Or who shut up the sea with doors, when it brake forth, as if it had issued
out of the womb?
When I made the cloud the garment thereof, and thick darkness a
swaddlingband for it,
And brake up for it my decreed place, and set bars and doors,
And said, Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further: and here shall thy
proud waves be stayed?
Hast thou commanded the morning since thy days; and caused the dayspring to
know his place;
That it might take hold of the ends of the earth, that the wicked might be
shaken out of it?
It is turned as clay to the seal; and they stand as a garment.
And from the wicked their light is withholden, and the high arm shall be
broken.
Hast thou entered into the springs of the sea? or hast thou walked in the
search of the depth?
Have the gates of death been opened unto thee? or hast thou seen the doors
of the shadow of death?
Hast thou perceived the breadth of the earth? declare if thou knowest it
all.
Where is the way where light dwelleth? and as for darkness, where is the
place thereof,
That thou shouldest take it to the bound thereof, and that thou shouldest
know the paths to the house thereof?
Knowest thou it, because thou wast then born? or because the number of thy
days is great?
Hast thou entered into the treasures of the snow? or hast thou seen the
treasures of the hail,
Which I have reserved against the time of trouble, against the day of
battle and war?” [Job 36:1-41 (KJV)]
— PINOCCHIO’S PARADOX —
“THERE ONCE WAS A BOY.
WHO COULD TALK CROW.
AN EPIC BIG AS TOLSTOY.
FANNY TICKLE, NOSE GROW.
TWAS FOR LOVE OF RACH[I]EL.
SO DID NOT REALLY CARE.
OF ANY TRUTH TO COMPEL.
NOR OF CONCEIT DESPAIR.
VIVID PORTRAITS VAN GOGH.
EACH TIME TRUTH DISPLACE.
ONE DAY WAS MAD ENOUGH.
TO CUT AN EAR SPITING FACE.”
NOTES: Russian author Leo Tolstoy’s ‘War and Peace’ was serialized within
The Russian Messenger from 1865 to 1867. The entire novel was published by
1869 as comprised some 1,225 pages being a substantial accomplishment.
Adventures of Pinocchio was serially published by Italian author Carlo
Collodi between 1881 to 1882 and finally during February 1883. And the
Dutch artist Vincent Van Gogh at 35 yo cut off his ear on the evening of 23
December 1888 and gave it to a prostitute.
RACH[I]EL: is within the Cabala schema, one of the angelic luminaries
concerned with human sexuality (ie. Eros and Evil). Is one of the presiding
spirits of #175 - VENUS. Has been depicted as one of 3 angels of Friday:
Sachiel {covering of God} is an angel of the Cherubim and the presiding
spirit of the planet #34 - JUPITER; Whereas Sachiel-Melek was a king of the
underworld hierarchy governing priesthoods and sacrifices.
ANAEL: controls kingdoms and kings on earth in having dominion over the
moon. And proclaims: “Open ye the gates, that the righteous nation which
keepeth the truth may enter in.
Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee: because
he trusteth in thee.
Trust ye in the LORD for ever: for in the LORD JEHOVAH is everlasting
strength:
For he bringeth down them that dwell on high; the lofty city, he layeth it
low; he layeth it low, even to the ground; he bringeth it even to the
dust.” [Isaiah 26:2-5 (KJV)]
Thusly should I wish to obtain advice on eliminating extraneous Categories
of Understanding associated to the BOMB BLAST EVENT and which have been
systematically and unwillingly imposed upon me and its consequence is then
"hyper-arousal of the central nervous system and stress of the startle
reflex"
Whereby in terms of the WORD example the mind's phonetic apprehension is
impeded and stressed as then either discordant or unknowing of any word's
entity (ie. as the manner by which you can distinguish a car exhaust blow
back as a sudden and an inexplicable bang from an earlier experience of a
bomb blast) is a priori and transitional towards it's final comprehension
by it's acceptable, customary and correct orthography as Category of
Understanding.
Thus the recourse in my view is to either effect a stratagem of #YOD / #MEM
amplification THERAPY by which AMBIGUITY is delimited and so that the
apprehension process occurs normally as unimpeded and becomes de-stressed.
Or whether a prescription of a PSYCHOTROPIC pharmaceutical which whilst not
impeding either the apprehension or cognitive process is able to sedate the
“central nervous system and destressing of the startle reflex”.
But I am after all, seeking their advice of how best to resolve the injury
given they do not have any substantial practical clinical and case study
expertise with instances of bomb blasts experience.
Making a reasonable supposition as a logical, probable and hypothetical
proposition, which is then predicated upon by a determined course of
affirmative action to inform oneself through inquisition as elimination--is
the process of a rational mind practiced in acquiring knowledge and
explicit specification within Categories of Understanding.
That in my view, punctiliousness has an intrinsic phonetic correspondence
and is a functional cognitive characteristic which is intrinsic of the mind
and this process is not all unlike the initial starting point of this
chapter by its specific construction of meticulous narrative as neural
linguistic streaming and it's subsequent refinement until it was
satisfactory.
For example, if all but the first and last letters are scrambled and the
sentence is entirely ambiguous, you can still disambiguate the word and
fully comprehend the sentence, as Cambridge University researchers have
suggested:
"Taht in my veiw, psciiouelnunsts is an insniirtc phteinoc conrecoednprse
and fancounitl cvgiinote cartarseiichtc of mnid."
<http://douglastwitchell.com/scrambled_words.php>
And in a similar manner, the mind's phonetic apprehension as the knowing of
any word's entity (ie. as the manner by which you can distinguish a car
exhaust blow back as a sudden and an inexplicable bang from an earlier
experience of a bomb blast) is a priori and transitional towards it's final
comprehension by it's acceptable, customary and correct orthography as
Category of Understanding.
Confusion like fear and paranoia which steadfastly and habitually refuses
to overcome its ignorant state by informing itself, can then be considered
delusional.'
Here is an another description of Autonomy of Will which is then an
Adam/Eve original sin scenario: 'That it is then, manifestly the
substantial cause as my impetus for the claim that you have departed from
all sense of decency as decorum being a stable characteristic, in having
lost a total semblance of rationality, as any connectivity with the
temporal as sensibility and coherence of reality--manifestly an insanity as
narcissist personality disordered.
You after all, are young and whimsical in being entirely driven as governed
by a daemonic circumstantial desire as inclusive of your sexual
appetite--it can no more make a justifiable claim of a substantial
rationality, coherence and integrity of being because you are entirely
unable to keep your intention, the utterance of your words and any
consequential action within concord as the ethereal quality and the
affirmation of the legitimacy of existence, which separates the mind of a
man from the impertinence, impudence and the inconsequential amorality of
the boy as possessing a deficiency and having a questionable and an
illegitimacy as only a pretentious claim to humanity.
The fragile, pathetic, frightened and circumstantial condition which is
your existence is clearly conveyed by the deprivation of language, which
isn't really sufficient as a quality or quantity to even authenticate your
humanity.
A cockatoo would have a larger vocabulary!
Your manner of speech is a testimony to the ineffectual, circumstantial
manner of your life, which is driven by a contrary desire as feigned reason
(ie. the real and substantiating human dynamic) being the cause for
preference as fickle and inconsequential values. Other than to utter some
idiosyncratic preferences as wants, you are incapable of engaging within a
rational process of negotiation in order to resolve the dynamics of any
sexual opportunism, overcome any impediments to the whimsical
determination, that it might possibly occur--raising the significant
question as to whether you are even capable of showing any accountability
for harm reduction within your inter-personal interaction as your sexual
conduct. As being, something more than happenstance and thereby it's only
claim to virtue.
- dolf
A DRAFT REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF FROM THIS URL:
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Karl%20Marx.pdf>
Initial Post: 5 May 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
