Edward Bird
2004-04-01 11:02:03 UTC
I recently made the big mistake of entering a single table limit holdem
tournament on Ladbrokes poker, instead of the usual No Limit game. I simply
couldn't believe how tedious and boring it was. Even though the players are
given fewer chips than the equivalent No Limit tournament, it seemed to drag
on for ages.
Can anyone explain to me why Americans, as the inventors of poker, have such
a fascination with this form of poker? I have joined several American poker
sites and they virtually all only offer limit games, (even for Omaha!),
which is a real shame. The choice for no limit and pot limit games is
therefore somewhat limited (if you'll excuse the pun) to Ladbrokes, Victor
Chandler and now recently William Hill...all European sites. I believe
Empire Poker have big bet games, but they don't offer straightforward
buy-in/cash-out procedures for non US residents (another shame).
I don't believe the argument that limit is more skilful...how many times
have you been drawn out on by an inferior hand in a limit game, just so they
can make one bet on the river [DOH!]? It's impossible to get the limpers out
of the damn pot! I believe limit players are simply scared to lose money or
they want to make the game last longer (in a similar fashion to someone who
covers 95% of the table in a roullette game). If this is the case, why not
play in 'fun' games that don't involve any money?
If someone can give me a good argument for limit over big bet poker, I'd be
happy to hear it! Otherwise I can only recommend to most Americans and other
misguided people that they read Pot-Limit and No-Limit Poker by Stewart
Reuben & Bob Ciaffone, be converted, and break the chains of tradition!
tournament on Ladbrokes poker, instead of the usual No Limit game. I simply
couldn't believe how tedious and boring it was. Even though the players are
given fewer chips than the equivalent No Limit tournament, it seemed to drag
on for ages.
Can anyone explain to me why Americans, as the inventors of poker, have such
a fascination with this form of poker? I have joined several American poker
sites and they virtually all only offer limit games, (even for Omaha!),
which is a real shame. The choice for no limit and pot limit games is
therefore somewhat limited (if you'll excuse the pun) to Ladbrokes, Victor
Chandler and now recently William Hill...all European sites. I believe
Empire Poker have big bet games, but they don't offer straightforward
buy-in/cash-out procedures for non US residents (another shame).
I don't believe the argument that limit is more skilful...how many times
have you been drawn out on by an inferior hand in a limit game, just so they
can make one bet on the river [DOH!]? It's impossible to get the limpers out
of the damn pot! I believe limit players are simply scared to lose money or
they want to make the game last longer (in a similar fashion to someone who
covers 95% of the table in a roullette game). If this is the case, why not
play in 'fun' games that don't involve any money?
If someone can give me a good argument for limit over big bet poker, I'd be
happy to hear it! Otherwise I can only recommend to most Americans and other
misguided people that they read Pot-Limit and No-Limit Poker by Stewart
Reuben & Bob Ciaffone, be converted, and break the chains of tradition!