Discussion:
REVIEW - Freddie Mitchell: "Fish Market Boogie" - DERBY 739; JULY 1950
(too old to reply)
DianeE
2021-03-10 16:52:34 UTC
Permalink
https://www.spontaneouslunacy.net/freddie-mitchell-fish-market-boogie-derby-739/


YOUTUBE -



SPONTANEOUS LUNACY VERDICT 2/10
Roger Ford
2021-03-11 13:57:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by DianeE
https://www.spontaneouslunacy.net/freddie-mitchell-fish-market-boogie-derby-739/
YOUTUBE - http://youtu.be/Ah5t5LuXQn4
SPONTANEOUS LUNACY VERDICT 2/10
Almost as boring as the Harry & Meghan Show



ROGER FORD
-----------------------

"Spam Free Zone" - to combat unwanted automatic spamming I have added
an extra "b" in my e-mail address (***@bblueyonder.co.uk) Please
delete same before responding.Thank you!
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
DianeE
2021-03-11 14:23:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger Ford
Post by DianeE
https://www.spontaneouslunacy.net/freddie-mitchell-fish-market-boogie-derby-739/
YOUTUBE - http://youtu.be/Ah5t5LuXQn4
SPONTANEOUS LUNACY VERDICT 2/10
Almost as boring as the Harry & Meghan Show
--------------
I sympathize. They don't interest me either. I applaud their good
works but I do not care about their personal lives.

As for Freddie Mitchell, Bruce summed it up when he said he sounds like
he's playing a toy piano. After the horns come in on this record it
improves a lot. A 2 is pretty harsh, more of a 4 for me.
Roger Ford
2021-03-11 14:49:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger Ford
Post by Roger Ford
Post by DianeE
https://www.spontaneouslunacy.net/freddie-mitchell-fish-market-boogie-derby-739/
YOUTUBE - http://youtu.be/Ah5t5LuXQn4
SPONTANEOUS LUNACY VERDICT 2/10
Almost as boring as the Harry & Meghan Show
--------------
I sympathize. They don't interest me either. I applaud their good
works but I do not care about their personal lives.
I have no time for these kind of folk who preach conservation and
spout dire warnings of imminent climate disaster whilst coming down
the steps of their just landed private jet
Post by Roger Ford
As for Freddie Mitchell, Bruce summed it up when he said he sounds like
he's playing a toy piano. After the horns come in on this record it
improves a lot. A 2 is pretty harsh, more of a 4 for me.
I'll be charitable and go in the middle...a 3

ROGER FORD
-----------------------

"Spam Free Zone" - to combat unwanted automatic spamming I have added
an extra "b" in my e-mail address (***@bblueyonder.co.uk) Please
delete same before responding.Thank you!
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Sav...@aol.com
2021-03-11 17:28:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger Ford
I have no time for these kind of folk who preach conservation and
spout dire warnings of imminent climate disaster whilst coming down
the steps of their just landed private jet
That has nothing to do with whether or not they are correct (they are) about imminent climate disaster. Sounds like you are willing to cut off your nose to spite your face just because you don't like the messenger.
Roger Ford
2021-03-11 18:17:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@aol.com
Post by Roger Ford
I have no time for these kind of folk who preach conservation and
spout dire warnings of imminent climate disaster whilst coming down
the steps of their just landed private jet
That has nothing to do with whether or not they are correct (they are) about imminent climate disaster. Sounds like you are willing to cut off your nose to spite your face just because you don't like the messenger.
Duh!! It's TOTAL hypocrisy!!


ROGER FORD
-----------------------

"Spam Free Zone" - to combat unwanted automatic spamming I have added
an extra "b" in my e-mail address (***@bblueyonder.co.uk) Please
delete same before responding.Thank you!
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Sav...@aol.com
2021-03-11 18:39:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger Ford
Post by ***@aol.com
Post by Roger Ford
I have no time for these kind of folk who preach conservation and
spout dire warnings of imminent climate disaster whilst coming down
the steps of their just landed private jet
That has nothing to do with whether or not they are correct (they are) about imminent climate disaster. Sounds like you are willing to cut off your nose to spite your face just because you don't like the messenger.
Duh!! It's TOTAL hypocrisy!!
But irrelevant to whether or not there's an imminent climate disaster coming. We are already in it here with wildfires, tornados, hurricanes, Texas freezes and all kinds of other shit. In 30-40 years there will not be any more downtown Charleston, it will be under water. Same with a lot of southern Florida.
Roger Ford
2021-03-11 21:18:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger Ford
=20
On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 9:49:35 AM UTC-5, Roger Ford wrote:=20
=20
I have no time for these kind of folk who preach conservation and=20
spout dire warnings of imminent climate disaster whilst coming down=20
the steps of their just landed private jet=20
=20
That has nothing to do with whether or not they are correct (they are) a=
bout imminent climate disaster. Sounds like you are willing to cut off your=
nose to spite your face just because you don't like the messenger.
Post by Roger Ford
Duh!! It's TOTAL hypocrisy!!
But irrelevant to whether or not there's an imminent climate disaster comin=
g. We are already in it here with wildfires, tornados, hurricanes, Texas fr=
eezes and all kinds of other shit. In 30-40 years there will not be any mor=
e downtown Charleston, it will be under water. Same with a lot of southern =
Florida.=20
Nobody is denying there *may be* a climate disaster in the future.

My point is that it is hastened by these two (plus many others) who
preach to others the evils of carbon dioxide pollution whilst
hypocritically adding greatly to it themselves with private jets and
gas guzzling cars.

And that is only a *may be* as regards such a disaster.

Several scenarios may occur BEFORE climate change gets out that much
of hand as you describe----the most likely being the advent of proper
non-polluting nuclear energy to satisfy the power needs of our planet

ROGER FORD
-----------------------

"Spam Free Zone" - to combat unwanted automatic spamming I have added
an extra "b" in my e-mail address (***@bblueyonder.co.uk) Please
delete same before responding.Thank you!
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Sav...@aol.com
2021-03-11 21:48:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger Ford
Post by Roger Ford
=20
On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 9:49:35 AM UTC-5, Roger Ford wrote:=20
=20
I have no time for these kind of folk who preach conservation and=20
spout dire warnings of imminent climate disaster whilst coming down=20
the steps of their just landed private jet=20
=20
That has nothing to do with whether or not they are correct (they are) a=
bout imminent climate disaster. Sounds like you are willing to cut off your=
nose to spite your face just because you don't like the messenger.
Post by Roger Ford
Duh!! It's TOTAL hypocrisy!!
But irrelevant to whether or not there's an imminent climate disaster comin=
g. We are already in it here with wildfires, tornados, hurricanes, Texas fr=
eezes and all kinds of other shit. In 30-40 years there will not be any mor=
e downtown Charleston, it will be under water. Same with a lot of southern =
Florida.=20
Nobody is denying there *may be* a climate disaster in the future.
My point is that it is hastened by these two (plus many others) who
preach to others the evils of carbon dioxide pollution whilst
hypocritically adding greatly to it themselves with private jets and
gas guzzling cars.
Yes, I got your point 4 posts ago. But the much larger point is that they are correct about what's happening with climate. Your point reminds me of people who claim that I have no right to comment on politics unless I am voting.
Roger Ford
2021-03-12 06:30:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@aol.com
Post by Roger Ford
Post by Roger Ford
=20
On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 9:49:35 AM UTC-5, Roger Ford wrote:=20
=20
I have no time for these kind of folk who preach conservation and=20
spout dire warnings of imminent climate disaster whilst coming down=20
the steps of their just landed private jet=20
=20
That has nothing to do with whether or not they are correct (they are) a=
bout imminent climate disaster. Sounds like you are willing to cut off your=
nose to spite your face just because you don't like the messenger.
Post by Roger Ford
Duh!! It's TOTAL hypocrisy!!
But irrelevant to whether or not there's an imminent climate disaster comin=
g. We are already in it here with wildfires, tornados, hurricanes, Texas fr=
eezes and all kinds of other shit. In 30-40 years there will not be any mor=
e downtown Charleston, it will be under water. Same with a lot of southern =
Florida.=20
Nobody is denying there *may be* a climate disaster in the future.
My point is that it is hastened by these two (plus many others) who
preach to others the evils of carbon dioxide pollution whilst
hypocritically adding greatly to it themselves with private jets and
gas guzzling cars.
Yes, I got your point 4 posts ago. But the much larger point is that they are correct about what's happening with climate. Your point reminds me of people who claim that I have no right to comment on politics unless I am voting.
For the NTH time I don't dispute that that they are correct about the
climate changes that appear to be going on (tho a future "disaster"
whilst of course possible is NOT a foregone conclusion)

I DO object strongly to the sheer hypocrisy they (and others of
similar ilk) then display by proceeding to help hasten such events in
the manner I've described.




ROGER FORD
-----------------------

"Spam Free Zone" - to combat unwanted automatic spamming I have added
an extra "b" in my e-mail address (***@bblueyonder.co.uk) Please
delete same before responding.Thank you!
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Sav...@aol.com
2021-03-12 14:36:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger Ford
For the NTH time I don't dispute that that they are correct about the
climate changes that appear to be going on (tho a future "disaster"
whilst of course possible is NOT a foregone conclusion)
Oh yes it is.
Roger Ford
2021-03-12 14:45:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@aol.com
Post by Roger Ford
For the NTH time I don't dispute that that they are correct about the
climate changes that appear to be going on (tho a future "disaster"
whilst of course possible is NOT a foregone conclusion)
Oh yes it is.
I see the discission has come down to kindergarten level response

ROGER FORD
-----------------------

"Spam Free Zone" - to combat unwanted automatic spamming I have added
an extra "b" in my e-mail address (***@bblueyonder.co.uk) Please
delete same before responding.Thank you!
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Sav...@aol.com
2021-03-12 15:23:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger Ford
Post by ***@aol.com
Post by Roger Ford
For the NTH time I don't dispute that that they are correct about the
climate changes that appear to be going on (tho a future "disaster"
whilst of course possible is NOT a foregone conclusion)
Oh yes it is.
I see the discission has come down to kindergarten level response
Climate Change Facts
Courtesy of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions

What is climate change?
Due largely to the combustion of fossil fuels, atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, the principal greenhouse gas, are at a level unequaled for more than 400,000 years. As a result, an enhanced greenhouse effect is trapping more of the sun’s heat near the earth’s surface and gradually pushing the planet’s climate system into uncharted territory .

Carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases always have been present in the atmosphere, keeping the earth hospitable to life by trapping heat. Yet, since the industrial revolution, emissions of these gases from human activity have accumulated steadily, trapping more heat and exacerbating the natural greenhouse effect.

As a result, global average temperatures have risen both on land and in the oceans, with observable impacts already occurring that foretell increasingly severe changes in the future. Polar ice is melting. Glaciers around the globe are in retreat. Storms are increasing in intensity. Ecosystems around the world already are reacting, as plant and animal species struggle to adapt to a shifting climate, and new climate-related threats emerge.

What are the effects of climate change?
Scientists predict that if the increase in greenhouse gas emissions continues unabated, temperatures will rise by as much as 10 degrees Fahrenheit by the end of this century, potentially causing dramatic—and irreversible—changes to the climate.

The consequences, both anticipated and unforeseen, will have profound ramifications for humanity and the world as a whole. Water supplies in some critical areas will dwindle as snow and ice disappear. Sea levels will rise, threatening coastal populations. Droughts and floods will become more common. And hurricanes and other powerful storms will increase in intensity. Adding to the threat will be the impacts of climate change on agricultural production and the spread of disease. Human health will be jeopardized by all of these changes.

What are the main sources of greenhouse gases?
Although greenhouse gas emissions are primarily associated with the burning of fossil fuels (chiefly, coal, oil and natural gas), they come from many sources. As a result, any effort to reduce the human impact on the climate will need to engage all sectors of society.

The largest contributors to total U.S. emissions are the electricity generation and transportation sectors; significant emissions also come from other commercial and agricultural activity and from residential and industrial buildings.

Most emissions come from a relatively small number of countries. The seven largest emitters—the United States, the European Union (EU), China, Russia, Japan, India and Canada—accounted for more than 70% of energy-related CO2 emissions in 2004. An effective strategy to avert dangerous climate change requires commitments and action by all the world’s major economies.

The United States, with 5% of the world’s population, is responsible for 25% of global GHG emissions, more than any other country. On an intensity basis (emissions per gross domestic product or GDP), U.S. emissions are roughly 50% higher than the European Union’s or Japan’s. On a per capita basis, U.S. emissions are roughly twice as high as those of the EU and Japan (and five times the world average). U.S. emissions are projected to rise 8% above 2004 levels by 2010 (and 28% by 2025). By comparison, emissions are projected to hold steady in the EU, and decline 5% in Japan, by 2010.

Emissions are rising fastest in developing countries. China’s emissions are projected to nearly double, and India’s to increase an estimated 80%, by 2025. Annual emissions from all developing countries are projected to surpass those of developed countries between 2013 and 2018. Their per capita emissions, however, will remain much lower than those of developed countries. In 2025, per capita emissions in China are expected to be one-fourth—and in India, one-fourteenth — those of the United States.
Dennis C from Tennessee
2021-03-12 15:37:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@aol.com
Post by Roger Ford
Post by ***@aol.com
Post by Roger Ford
For the NTH time I don't dispute that that they are correct about the
climate changes that appear to be going on (tho a future "disaster"
whilst of course possible is NOT a foregone conclusion)
Oh yes it is.
I see the discission has come down to kindergarten level response
Climate Change Facts
Courtesy of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions
What is climate change?
Due largely to the combustion of fossil fuels, atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, the principal greenhouse gas, are at a level unequaled for more than 400,000 years. As a result, an enhanced greenhouse effect is trapping more of the sun’s heat near the earth’s surface and gradually pushing the planet’s climate system into uncharted territory .
Carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases always have been present in the atmosphere, keeping the earth hospitable to life by trapping heat. Yet, since the industrial revolution, emissions of these gases from human activity have accumulated steadily, trapping more heat and exacerbating the natural greenhouse effect.
As a result, global average temperatures have risen both on land and in the oceans, with observable impacts already occurring that foretell increasingly severe changes in the future. Polar ice is melting. Glaciers around the globe are in retreat. Storms are increasing in intensity. Ecosystems around the world already are reacting, as plant and animal species struggle to adapt to a shifting climate, and new climate-related threats emerge.
What are the effects of climate change?
Scientists predict that if the increase in greenhouse gas emissions continues unabated, temperatures will rise by as much as 10 degrees Fahrenheit by the end of this century, potentially causing dramatic—and irreversible—changes to the climate.
The consequences, both anticipated and unforeseen, will have profound ramifications for humanity and the world as a whole. Water supplies in some critical areas will dwindle as snow and ice disappear. Sea levels will rise, threatening coastal populations. Droughts and floods will become more common. And hurricanes and other powerful storms will increase in intensity. Adding to the threat will be the impacts of climate change on agricultural production and the spread of disease. Human health will be jeopardized by all of these changes.
What are the main sources of greenhouse gases?
Although greenhouse gas emissions are primarily associated with the burning of fossil fuels (chiefly, coal, oil and natural gas), they come from many sources. As a result, any effort to reduce the human impact on the climate will need to engage all sectors of society.
The largest contributors to total U.S. emissions are the electricity generation and transportation sectors; significant emissions also come from other commercial and agricultural activity and from residential and industrial buildings.
Most emissions come from a relatively small number of countries. The seven largest emitters—the United States, the European Union (EU), China, Russia, Japan, India and Canada—accounted for more than 70% of energy-related CO2 emissions in 2004. An effective strategy to avert dangerous climate change requires commitments and action by all the world’s major economies.
The United States, with 5% of the world’s population, is responsible for 25% of global GHG emissions, more than any other country. On an intensity basis (emissions per gross domestic product or GDP), U.S. emissions are roughly 50% higher than the European Union’s or Japan’s. On a per capita basis, U.S. emissions are roughly twice as high as those of the EU and Japan (and five times the world average). U.S. emissions are projected to rise 8% above 2004 levels by 2010 (and 28% by 2025). By comparison, emissions are projected to hold steady in the EU, and decline 5% in Japan, by 2010.
Emissions are rising fastest in developing countries. China’s emissions are projected to nearly double, and India’s to increase an estimated 80%, by 2025. Annual emissions from all developing countries are projected to surpass those of developed countries between 2013 and 2018. Their per capita emissions, however, will remain much lower than those of developed countries. In 2025, per capita emissions in China are expected to be one-fourth—and in India, one-fourteenth — those of the United States.
Brucie I DO believe you could bore a three- toed sloth out of his fuckin' tree, baby!!
Roger Ford
2021-03-12 20:14:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@aol.com
Post by Roger Ford
=20
On Friday, March 12, 2021 at 1:30:49 AM UTC-5, Roger Ford wrote:=20
=20
For the NTH time I don't dispute that that they are correct about the=
=20
Post by Roger Ford
climate changes that appear to be going on (tho a future "disaster"=20
whilst of course possible is NOT a foregone conclusion)=20
=20
Oh yes it is.
I see the discission has come down to kindergarten level response
Climate Change Facts
Courtesy of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions
What is climate change?
Due largely to the combustion of fossil fuels, atmospheric concentrations o=
f carbon dioxide, the principal greenhouse gas, are at a level unequaled fo=
r more than 400,000 years. As a result, an enhanced greenhouse effect is tr=
apping more of the sun=E2=80=99s heat near the earth=E2=80=99s surface and =
gradually pushing the planet=E2=80=99s climate system into uncharted territ=
ory .
Carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases always have been present in=
the atmosphere, keeping the earth hospitable to life by trapping heat. Yet=
, since the industrial revolution, emissions of these gases from human acti=
vity have accumulated steadily, trapping more heat and exacerbating the nat=
ural greenhouse effect.
As a result, global average temperatures have risen both on land and in the=
oceans, with observable impacts already occurring that foretell increasing=
ly severe changes in the future. Polar ice is melting. Glaciers around the =
globe are in retreat. Storms are increasing in intensity. Ecosystems around=
the world already are reacting, as plant and animal species struggle to ad=
apt to a shifting climate, and new climate-related threats emerge.
What are the effects of climate change?
Scientists predict that if the increase in greenhouse gas emissions continu=
es unabated, temperatures will rise by as much as 10 degrees Fahrenheit by =
the end of this century, potentially causing dramatic=E2=80=94and irreversi=
ble=E2=80=94changes to the climate.
The consequences, both anticipated and unforeseen, will have profound ramif=
ications for humanity and the world as a whole. Water supplies in some crit=
ical areas will dwindle as snow and ice disappear. Sea levels will rise, th=
reatening coastal populations. Droughts and floods will become more common.=
And hurricanes and other powerful storms will increase in intensity. Addin=
g to the threat will be the impacts of climate change on agricultural produ=
ction and the spread of disease. Human health will be jeopardized by all of=
these changes.
What are the main sources of greenhouse gases?
Although greenhouse gas emissions are primarily associated with the burning=
of fossil fuels (chiefly, coal, oil and natural gas), they come from many =
sources. As a result, any effort to reduce the human impact on the climate =
will need to engage all sectors of society.
The largest contributors to total U.S. emissions are the electricity genera=
tion and transportation sectors; significant emissions also come from other=
commercial and agricultural activity and from residential and industrial b=
uildings.
Most emissions come from a relatively small number of countries. The seven =
largest emitters=E2=80=94the United States, the European Union (EU), China,=
Russia, Japan, India and Canada=E2=80=94accounted for more than 70% of ene=
rgy-related CO2 emissions in 2004. An effective strategy to avert dangerous=
climate change requires commitments and action by all the world=E2=80=99s =
major economies.
The United States, with 5% of the world=E2=80=99s population, is responsibl=
e for 25% of global GHG emissions, more than any other country. On an inten=
sity basis (emissions per gross domestic product or GDP), U.S. emissions ar=
e roughly 50% higher than the European Union=E2=80=99s or Japan=E2=80=99s. =
On a per capita basis, U.S. emissions are roughly twice as high as those of=
the EU and Japan (and five times the world average). U.S. emissions are pr=
ojected to rise 8% above 2004 levels by 2010 (and 28% by 2025). By comparis=
on, emissions are projected to hold steady in the EU, and decline 5% in Jap=
an, by 2010.
Emissions are rising fastest in developing countries. China=E2=80=99s emiss=
ions are projected to nearly double, and India=E2=80=99s to increase an est=
imated 80%, by 2025. Annual emissions from all developing countries are pro=
jected to surpass those of developed countries between 2013 and 2018. Their=
per capita emissions, however, will remain much lower than those of develo=
ped countries. In 2025, per capita emissions in China are expected to be on=
e-fourth=E2=80=94and in India, one-fourteenth =E2=80=94 those of the United=
States.
TWO More Lots Of Climate Change Facts

EU Science Hub

Scientists list four key actions to halt global warming
Scientists identify four technological dynamics in the energy sector,
having the power to limit global warming to below 2°C if implemented
simultaneously.
The study shows that it is technically possible to transition to clean
energy and reach the 2°C target at relatively small cost, while
triggering benefits, such as improvements in air quality, and reducing
the economic impacts of climate change itself.
©adrian_ilie825 – Adobe Stock.com
MAR
30
2020
The latest edition of the JRC’s Global Energy and Climate Outlook
(GECO), identifies four technological dynamics in the energy sector
that have the power to limit global warming to below 2°C if
implemented simultaneously.

The global average temperature is already 1°C above the pre-industrial
levels and today's emissions and energy consumption trends are not on
track to meet the targets of the Paris Agreement.

But the means exist to reach those targets.

The JRC’s latest Global Energy and Climate Outlook (GECO), produced
jointly with the Chinese National Center for Climate Change Strategy
and International Cooperation (NCSC), shows that it is technically
possible to reach the 2°C target of the Paris agreement – at
relatively low cost – by simultaneously transforming four elements of
the energy system.

1 - Electrification can supercharge the energy transition
Electricity is increasingly produced from renewable energy sources.
Therefore, electrification – replacing technologies that run on fossil
fuels with alternatives that run on electricity – plays a key role in
the energy transition.

The report finds that electrification rates have been increasing in
all energy-consuming sectors (industry, buildings and transport), and
will continue to increase even in the absence of new, stronger climate
policies.

However, a further push is needed to electrify the energy consuming
sectors so as to accelerate the decarbonisation of the entire energy
system.

Transport, in particular, is one of the crucial sectors that has shown
a very low degree of electrification so far, but this situation is
likely to revert soon thanks to the quick development of electric
vehicles and the expected uptake of electricity-derived synthetic
fuels.

When combined with a transition towards renewable electricity,
electrification can also have positive effects for air quality and
human health.

2 - Decarbonising power generation
Decarbonisation of power generation can be achieved by increasing the
share of low-carbon energy sources, particularly renewables, and
reducing the use of fossil fuels.

With the decarbonisation of power generation, electricity
progressively becomes a low-carbon fuel.

The JRC report argues that full decarbonisation of power generation is
not only technically feasible but also an economically cost-attractive
measure to combat climate change.

Key low-carbon power generation technologies are already available.
And with lower generation cost than that of fossil fuel-based
technologies in a growing number of markets around the world, they are
also increasingly competitive.

Apart from electricity, the 2°C scenarios also see the wider adoption
of other low-carbon energy carriers such as liquid biofuels, hydrogen,
e-gas and e-liquids.

3 - Boosting energy efficiency
Energy efficiency options in our buildings, transportation, and
industrial sectors help save energy and reduce consumption.

The report stresses that the switch from inefficient fossil fuel
technologies to more-efficient electric ones offers efficiency gains.

For instance, electric technologies such as heat pumps in buildings
and electric vehicles have higher energy efficiency than traditional
heating systems and vehicles.

4 - Mobilising novel options for integrating and storing green energy
The report also calls for mobilising new solutions that would enable
the expansion of renewable energy technologies, some of which are
intermittent by nature.

For instance, stationary energy storage solutions can be used to
increase the share of renewables in the power mix, and stabilise the
power grid.

What's the cost?
The study shows that it is technically possible to transition to clean
energy and reach the 2°C target at relatively small cost, while
triggering benefits, such as improvements in air quality, and reducing
the economic impacts of climate change itself.

The scientists estimated that the cost over the coming decades would
add up to 0.03% of GDP annually, meaning that the global economy would
still more than double by 2050.

The report also stresses that better enabling conditions for
electrification can play a significant role in lowering the
macroeconomic costs.



Further info: http://ec.europa.eu/jrc/geco/

And from the Union Of Concerned Scientists............

Climate change is one of the most challenging problems that humanity
has ever faced. At stake are hundreds of millions of lives,
innumerable species and ecosystems, the health and viability of the
economy, and the future habitability of this planet.

Fortunately, climate change is solvable. We have the technologies. We
have the science. We now need the leadership—and the courage to change
course.

Cut emissions
EXPLAINER

Carbon Pricing 101
When carbon emissions cost money, we produce less of them.
Carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases are the main drivers of
global warming. While climate change cannot be stopped, it can be
slowed.

To avoid the worst consequences of climate change, we’ll need to reach
“net zero” carbon emissions by 2050 or sooner. Net zero means that, on
balance, no more carbon is dumped into the atmosphere than is taken
out.

To achieve net zero emissions, we need a massive transformation in how
we produce and consume electricity. We need a newer, better
transportation system. We need to stop deforestation. We need a
climate-friendly agricultural system.

The scale of these changes will require significant federal policy
that puts a price on carbon. It also requires international
cooperation: the Paris Agreement, signed in 2016, reflects the world’s
best effort to solve climate change so far, though it doesn’t include
the emissions reductions we need.

Much remains to be done—and we need to do it as quickly as possible.

Remove carbon dioxide
To reach net zero emissions, we need to do more than just reduce our
emissions: we need to actively remove carbon dioxide from the
atmosphere or offset its effects.

The easiest way to do this is by planting new forests (afforestation)
or restoring old ones (reforestation). Other enhanced land management
practices can help, as can new technologies that suck CO2 out of the
air (“direct air capture”), or prevent it from leaving smokestacks
(“carbon capture and storage”).

Scale, speed, and cost are the main barriers to all these technologies
and approaches. In the United States, strong state- and federal-level
policies—and large-scale investment in research and development—are
crucial.

Fight disinformation
FEATURE
Diagram of evasive football play
The Disinformation Playbook
Five tactics business interests use to sideline science, deceive the
public and buy influence at the expense of public health and safety.
For years, media pundits, partisan think tanks, and special interest
groups funded by fossil fuel companies have raised doubts about the
truth of global warming.

These contrarians downplay and distort the evidence of climate change,
lobby for policies that reward polluters, and attempt to undercut
existing pollution standards.

This barrage of disinformation misleads and confuses the public about
the growing consequences of global warming and makes it more difficult
to implement the solutions we really need. Until the influence of
these special interests is sufficiently diminished, climate action
will be that much harder.

Prepare and adapt
REPORT
isle de jean charles biloxi chitimacha choctaw tribe
Toward Climate Resilience
15 principles to ensure that investments in climate change adaptation
are scientifically sound, socially just, and fiscally sensible.
No matter how quickly we reduce emissions, the reality is that certain
climate impacts are inevitable. The seas are rising. Temperatures
break records every year.

Droughts, floods, and extreme weather are damaging communities today.

Cutting carbon is the only long-term solution for avoiding climate
impacts. In the short-term, we need to adapt. That means everything
from discouraging development in high-risk areas, to planning for
water scarcity, to building more resilient cities and communities.
Investments should be scientifically sound and socially just, and
focused where the impacts are greatest—often in low-income communities
and communities of color.

Act
The best policy ideas in the world aren’t worth much if we don’t have
activists, experts, and everyday people fighting for change. From
school groups to churches; from corporate boardrooms to mayors and
local leaders: we need action.

The Union of Concerned Scientists has worked on global warming
solutions for over 30 years. Our experts and activists are campaigning
to cut emissions from the energy and transportation sectors;
highlighting climate impacts; and fighting for accountability from
major fossil fuel companies. You can help.


ROGER FORD
-----------------------

"Spam Free Zone" - to combat unwanted automatic spamming I have added
an extra "b" in my e-mail address (***@bblueyonder.co.uk) Please
delete same before responding.Thank you!
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Sav...@aol.com
2021-03-12 20:23:48 UTC
Permalink
Yes we are capable of doing something about it, but it won't happen if American Republicans get back in power.
DianeE
2021-03-12 21:59:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@aol.com
Yes we are capable of doing something about it, but it won't happen if American Republicans get back in power.
----------
Then stop wasting your time in this circle jerk and start making phone
calls for your candidates.
Sav...@aol.com
2021-03-12 22:01:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger Ford
Post by ***@aol.com
Yes we are capable of doing something about it, but it won't happen if American Republicans get back in power.
----------
Then stop wasting your time in this circle jerk and start making phone
calls for your candidates.
I am a keen observer, not an activist.
Dennis C from Tennessee
2021-03-12 22:06:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@aol.com
Post by Roger Ford
Post by ***@aol.com
Yes we are capable of doing something about it, but it won't happen if American Republicans get back in power.
----------
Then stop wasting your time in this circle jerk and start making phone
calls for your candidates.
I am a keen observer, not an activist.
Keen observer = Bullshit Dispenser, baby!!
Roger Ford
2021-03-13 05:35:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@aol.com
Yes we are capable of doing something about it, but it won't happen if American Republicans get back in power.
It's the scientists who will ultimately find the answers (and
hopefully save the planet)--your great nation has more than its share
of the best minds on the planet so don't sell them short


ROGER FORD
-----------------------

"Spam Free Zone" - to combat unwanted automatic spamming I have added
an extra "b" in my e-mail address (***@bblueyonder.co.uk) Please
delete same before responding.Thank you!
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Sav...@aol.com
2021-03-13 13:55:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger Ford
Post by ***@aol.com
Yes we are capable of doing something about it, but it won't happen if American Republicans get back in power.
It's the scientists who will ultimately find the answers (and
hopefully save the planet)--your great nation has more than its share
of the best minds on the planet so don't sell them short
The scientists already know the answers. But many Republicans say that climate change is a hoax. That's why Trump pulled us out of the Paris accord.
Roger Ford
2021-03-13 14:32:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@aol.com
Post by Roger Ford
Post by ***@aol.com
Yes we are capable of doing something about it, but it won't happen if American Republicans get back in power.
It's the scientists who will ultimately find the answers (and
hopefully save the planet)--your great nation has more than its share
of the best minds on the planet so don't sell them short
The scientists already know the answers. But many Republicans say that climate change is a hoax. That's why Trump pulled us out of the Paris accord.
They clearly don't know all the answers or the process would not still
be happening.As I said before,a worldwide carbon neutral power source
is probably the most important discovery that would stop or at least
slow down considerably the changes

But yes, I do agree that matters would move along a lot better without
the idiots in all nations who believe the whole thing is some gigantic
hoax

ROGER FORD
-----------------------

"Spam Free Zone" - to combat unwanted automatic spamming I have added
an extra "b" in my e-mail address (***@bblueyonder.co.uk) Please
delete same before responding.Thank you!
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Dennis C from Tennessee
2021-03-13 15:44:50 UTC
Permalink
It's all bunkum, baby!!!

I loved it when you kookies called it "Global Warming" until those last nor'easters reduced your balls to Birds Eyes green peas!! Now it's "Climate Change!!

Anyway, Diane told me you need to worry more about climax and not climate change, baby!!
Sav...@aol.com
2021-03-13 16:40:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger Ford
Post by ***@aol.com
Post by Roger Ford
Post by ***@aol.com
Yes we are capable of doing something about it, but it won't happen if American Republicans get back in power.
It's the scientists who will ultimately find the answers (and
hopefully save the planet)--your great nation has more than its share
of the best minds on the planet so don't sell them short
The scientists already know the answers. But many Republicans say that climate change is a hoax. That's why Trump pulled us out of the Paris accord.
They clearly don't know all the answers or the process would not still
be happening.
Not true. The answers involve a many year process that none of the Republicans here are willing to go for. Without the US in this will not get solved. And there are some other countries that also refuse to participate. The Republicans here get a huge chunk of their contributions from big oil and other businesses that are against doing anything about the problem. Check the poll numbers below. Only 24% of Republicans think that the government is not doing enough about climate change. More than that (26%) think that the Government is already doing too much about it.

While there is strong consensus among Democrats (90%, including independents who lean to the Democratic Party) on the need for more government efforts to reduce the effects of climate change, Republican views are divided along ideological, generational and gender lines. A majority of moderate or liberal Republicans (65%, including GOP-leaning independents) say the federal government is doing too little to reduce the effects of climate change. In contrast, only about one-quarter of conservative Republicans (24%) say the same, while about half (48%) think the government is doing about the right amount and another 26% say it is doing too much.

There are also divides by age. Among younger Republicans – adults in the Millennial generation and Generation Z, ages 18 to 38 in 2019 – 52% think the government is doing too little on climate. By comparison, 41% among Generation X and 31% of Baby Boomer and older Americans say this. Republican women (46%) also are more inclined than GOP men (34%) to think the government’s efforts on climate are insufficient.
Roger Ford
2021-03-13 17:01:33 UTC
Permalink
=20
On Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 12:35:09 AM UTC-5, Roger Ford wrote:=20
=20
Yes we are capable of doing something about it, but it won't happen i=
f American Republicans get back in power.=20
It's the scientists who will ultimately find the answers (and=20
hopefully save the planet)--your great nation has more than its share=
=20
of the best minds on the planet so don't sell them short=20
=20
The scientists already know the answers. But many Republicans say that c=
limate change is a hoax. That's why Trump pulled us out of the Paris accord=
.
They clearly don't know all the answers or the process would not still=20
be happening.
Not true. The answers involve a many year process that none of the Republic=
ans here are willing to go for. Without the US in this will not get solved.=
And there are some other countries that also refuse to participate. The Re=
publicans here get a huge chunk of their contributions from big oil and oth=
er businesses that are against doing anything about the problem. Check the =
poll numbers below. Only 24% of Republicans think that the government is no=
t doing enough about climate change. More than that (26%) think that the Go=
vernment is already doing too much about it.
While there is strong consensus among Democrats (90%, including independent=
s who lean to the Democratic Party) on the need for more government efforts=
to reduce the effects of climate change, Republican views are divided alon=
g ideological, generational and gender lines. A majority of moderate or lib=
eral Republicans (65%, including GOP-leaning independents) say the federal =
government is doing too little to reduce the effects of climate change. In =
contrast, only about one-quarter of conservative Republicans (24%) say the =
same, while about half (48%) think the government is doing about the right =
amount and another 26% say it is doing too much.
There are also divides by age. Among younger Republicans =E2=80=93 adults i=
n the Millennial generation and Generation Z, ages 18 to 38 in 2019 =E2=80=
=93 52% think the government is doing too little on climate. By comparison,=
41% among Generation X and 31% of Baby Boomer and older Americans say this=
. Republican women (46%) also are more inclined than GOP men (34%) to think=
the government=E2=80=99s efforts on climate are insufficient.
Its pretty obvious the political will in a lot of countries
(including mine too) on the neccessary worldwide scale will not meet
the problem head on until the very last possible moment---if even
then----which is why,as I keep saying we urgently need scientific
breakthroughs---especially on a safe carbon neutral non-polluting
power source that can be embraced by all

ROGER FORD
-----------------------

"Spam Free Zone" - to combat unwanted automatic spamming I have added
an extra "b" in my e-mail address (***@bblueyonder.co.uk) Please
delete same before responding.Thank you!
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Dean F.
2021-03-12 03:01:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@aol.com
But irrelevant to whether or not there's an imminent climate disaster coming. We are already in it here with wildfires, tornados, hurricanes, Texas freezes and all kinds of other shit. In 30-40 years there will not be any
more downtown Charleston, it will be under water. Same with a lot of southern Florida.
In Connecticut, the birds now return from down south in mid-January. Also, I'm seeing flies and smelling skunks all winter long. None of that used to happen around here until well into March. So yeah, climate disaster is real.
DianeE
2021-03-11 22:29:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger Ford
Post by ***@aol.com
Post by Roger Ford
I have no time for these kind of folk who preach conservation and
spout dire warnings of imminent climate disaster whilst coming down
the steps of their just landed private jet
That has nothing to do with whether or not they are correct (they are) about imminent climate disaster. Sounds like you are willing to cut off your nose to spite your face just because you don't like the messenger.
Duh!! It's TOTAL hypocrisy!!
-----------
That wasn't even what I meant about their "good works"--I was referring
to their philanthropy, like the olympic-style games for disabled
veterans that Harry established.
Roger Ford
2021-03-12 12:03:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger Ford
Post by Roger Ford
Post by ***@aol.com
Post by Roger Ford
I have no time for these kind of folk who preach conservation and
spout dire warnings of imminent climate disaster whilst coming down
the steps of their just landed private jet
That has nothing to do with whether or not they are correct (they are) about imminent climate disaster. Sounds like you are willing to cut off your nose to spite your face just because you don't like the messenger.
Duh!! It's TOTAL hypocrisy!!
-----------
That wasn't even what I meant about their "good works"--I was referring
to their philanthropy, like the olympic-style games for disabled
veterans that Harry established.
I agree that Harry instigating the Invictus Games is to be
applauded----but it doesn't shut down valid criticism levelled at him
for his blatant hypocrisy in the climate change debate


ROGER FORD
-----------------------

"Spam Free Zone" - to combat unwanted automatic spamming I have added
an extra "b" in my e-mail address (***@bblueyonder.co.uk) Please
delete same before responding.Thank you!
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Dean F.
2021-03-12 02:59:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger Ford
Almost as boring as the Harry & Meghan Show
Haven't listened to the Freddie Mitchell song, but I certainly agree about Harry and Meghan.

I can't, for the life of me, understand why so many Americans are fascinated with the British Royal Family. Nothing personal, Roger, but we threw England outta here 245 years ago!
Roger Ford
2021-03-12 12:21:46 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:59:38 -0800 (PST), "Dean F."
Post by Dean F.
Post by Roger Ford
Almost as boring as the Harry & Meghan Show
Haven't listened to the Freddie Mitchell song, but I certainly agree about Harry and Meghan.
I can't, for the life of me, understand why so many Americans are fascinated with the British Royal Family. Nothing personal, Roger, but we threw England outta here 245 years ago!
I was always amazed on US trips the way people (especially older
Americans) expressed great interest in the Royals and seemed to have
the idea that just because I was British I must somehow know the
family members personally


ROGER FORD
-----------------------

"Spam Free Zone" - to combat unwanted automatic spamming I have added
an extra "b" in my e-mail address (***@bblueyonder.co.uk) Please
delete same before responding.Thank you!
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Dennis C from Tennessee
2021-03-12 14:37:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger Ford
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:59:38 -0800 (PST), "Dean F."
Post by Dean F.
Post by Roger Ford
Almost as boring as the Harry & Meghan Show
Haven't listened to the Freddie Mitchell song, but I certainly agree about Harry and Meghan.
I can't, for the life of me, understand why so many Americans are fascinated with the British Royal Family. Nothing personal, Roger, but we threw England outta here 245 years ago!
I was always amazed on US trips the way people (especially older
Americans) expressed great interest in the Royals and seemed to have
the idea that just because I was British I must somehow know the
family members personally
ROGER FORD
I don't know Harry or Markle but I know Roger Ford by god!!!!

Royal enough for me, baby!!!
Roger Ford
2021-03-12 14:46:55 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:37:27 -0800 (PST), Dennis C from Tennessee
Post by Dennis C from Tennessee
Post by Roger Ford
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:59:38 -0800 (PST), "Dean F."
Post by Dean F.
Post by Roger Ford
Almost as boring as the Harry & Meghan Show
Haven't listened to the Freddie Mitchell song, but I certainly agree about Harry and Meghan.
I can't, for the life of me, understand why so many Americans are fascinated with the British Royal Family. Nothing personal, Roger, but we threw England outta here 245 years ago!
I was always amazed on US trips the way people (especially older
Americans) expressed great interest in the Royals and seemed to have
the idea that just because I was British I must somehow know the
family members personally
ROGER FORD
I don't know Harry or Markle but I know Roger Ford by god!!!!
Royal enough for me, baby!!!
Okay....okay................

ARISE SIR DENNIS!!!!



ROGER FORD
-----------------------

"Spam Free Zone" - to combat unwanted automatic spamming I have added
an extra "b" in my e-mail address (***@bblueyonder.co.uk) Please
delete same before responding.Thank you!
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Sav...@aol.com
2021-03-13 04:41:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger Ford
Post by Dean F.
I can't, for the life of me, understand why so many Americans are fascinated with the British Royal Family.
I was always amazed on US trips the way people (especially older
Americans) expressed great interest in the Royals and seemed to have
the idea that just because I was British I must somehow know the
family members personally
In your pocket is there a portrait of the queen?
Roger Ford
2021-03-13 05:37:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@aol.com
Post by Roger Ford
Post by Dean F.
I can't, for the life of me, understand why so many Americans are fascinated with the British Royal Family.
I was always amazed on US trips the way people (especially older
Americans) expressed great interest in the Royals and seemed to have
the idea that just because I was British I must somehow know the
family members personally
In your pocket is there a portrait of the queen?
What a strange questioin

Of course there is. Quite a few in fact

How could there not be?


ROGER FORD
-----------------------

"Spam Free Zone" - to combat unwanted automatic spamming I have added
an extra "b" in my e-mail address (***@bblueyonder.co.uk) Please
delete same before responding.Thank you!
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Loading...