Discussion:
Is this a number in mathematics (21.31□), where the square symbol indicates a missing digit?
(too old to reply)
bassam king karzeddin
2017-12-28 07:53:28 UTC
Permalink
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
bassam king karzeddin
2017-12-28 09:15:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
And truly or frankly speaking, this very poor question of mine would immediately reveal unlimited or unimaginable subtle stupidity and foolishness of human beings generally and specially those many alleged top genius (mathematicians, physicians, philosophers, logicians, thinkers, politicians, ...etc), so unfortunately, for sure

Now, Is it truly possible that human minds are generally so naive up to this limit of stupidity? wonder!

Taking into account that there are indeed rare exceptions to every rules fore sure

So, being apparently better than monkeys doesn't prove at all that humans are intelligent beings, for sure

BKK
bassam king karzeddin
2017-12-28 09:42:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
And truly or frankly speaking, this very poor question of mine would immediately reveal unlimited or unimaginable subtle stupidity and foolishness of human beings generally and specially those many alleged top genius (mathematicians, physicians, philosophers, logicians, thinkers, politicians, ...etc), so unfortunately, for sure
Now, Is it truly possible that human minds are generally so naive up to this limit of stupidity? wonder!
Taking into account that there are indeed rare exceptions to every rules fore sure
So, being apparently better than monkeys doesn't prove at all that humans are intelligent beings, for sure
BKK
And truly and so unfortunately and very foolishly (I must confess) that I was giving those creatures many bigger things during my stay here since 2004, thinking that those creatures are honest and clever and would understand immediately from Big, hints, Big formulas, Big conjectures, Big facts with Big easy rigorous proofs they had never heard about it in their meaningless life,
but I was so shocked and surprised that they were suffering so badly from much lesser things that never occured to my mind, they are suffering basically from unlimited foolishness to a case of mentally retarded people, they were suffering too badly from their so little and very negligible egoistic problems, they were suffering from big selfishness beyond limits, many more psychological issues they are suffering so badly now

So, what is going on with those extinct creatures? wonder!

How the devils had made them so empty heads like that and without any ethics and convinced them that they are the smartest people after all? wonder!

So, what is really going on with those people? wonder!

Are they truly victims of the devils actions or devils themselves? wonder!

So, here is the whole problem again? For sure

BKK
b***@gmail.com
2017-12-28 10:17:43 UTC
Permalink
By the same retrograde amoebic logic, you could not
have geometry. What is lacking is a mechanism where
meaning is assigned to language in a conceptual space.

You could not have Pythagoras Law, since the
following concept would not exist:

{ <a,b,c> | a^2 + b^2 = c^2 }

For sure wonder the concept would not exist, if a,b,c
where allowed to be fictitious real numbers,

since then the set would be uncountable. But also if
we restrict our self to Pythagorean Triples from rational
numbers, the concept wouldn't not exist,

since the set would be still countable infinite,
but we have seen that with finite number of neurons,
the poor amoeba can only measure a few

triples, remember a number is a measurement and
hence the poor amoeba would never enjoy any geometry,
since it lacks a conceptual space.
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
And truly or frankly speaking, this very poor question of mine would immediately reveal unlimited or unimaginable subtle stupidity and foolishness of human beings generally and specially those many alleged top genius (mathematicians, physicians, philosophers, logicians, thinkers, politicians, ...etc), so unfortunately, for sure
Now, Is it truly possible that human minds are generally so naive up to this limit of stupidity? wonder!
Taking into account that there are indeed rare exceptions to every rules fore sure
So, being apparently better than monkeys doesn't prove at all that humans are intelligent beings, for sure
BKK
And truly and so unfortunately and very foolishly (I must confess) that I was giving those creatures many bigger things during my stay here since 2004, thinking that those creatures are honest and clever and would understand immediately from Big, hints, Big formulas, Big conjectures, Big facts with Big easy rigorous proofs they had never heard about it in their meaningless life,
but I was so shocked and surprised that they were suffering so badly from much lesser things that never occured to my mind, they are suffering basically from unlimited foolishness to a case of mentally retarded people, they were suffering too badly from their so little and very negligible egoistic problems, they were suffering from big selfishness beyond limits, many more psychological issues they are suffering so badly now
So, what is going on with those extinct creatures? wonder!
How the devils had made them so empty heads like that and without any ethics and convinced them that they are the smartest people after all? wonder!
So, what is really going on with those people? wonder!
Are they truly victims of the devils actions or devils themselves? wonder!
So, here is the whole problem again? For sure
BKK
b***@gmail.com
2017-12-28 10:19:00 UTC
Permalink
BTW, even if there were a super being with
a lot of neurons, this would be bounded by
the infinity border 10^604.

So we can say the Greek, with their geometry,
must have been completely out of their minds.
Lets get back to the dark ages

before it, the ages of hand to mouth and not
more. Credits to the other fathers of amoebic logic:

finite strings: WM
fictitious numbers: BKK
number measurement: JG
infinity border: AP
Post by b***@gmail.com
By the same retrograde amoebic logic, you could not
have geometry. What is lacking is a mechanism where
meaning is assigned to language in a conceptual space.
You could not have Pythagoras Law, since the
{ <a,b,c> | a^2 + b^2 = c^2 }
For sure wonder the concept would not exist, if a,b,c
where allowed to be fictitious real numbers,
since then the set would be uncountable. But also if
we restrict our self to Pythagorean Triples from rational
numbers, the concept wouldn't not exist,
since the set would be still countable infinite,
but we have seen that with finite number of neurons,
the poor amoeba can only measure a few
triples, remember a number is a measurement and
hence the poor amoeba would never enjoy any geometry,
since it lacks a conceptual space.
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
And truly or frankly speaking, this very poor question of mine would immediately reveal unlimited or unimaginable subtle stupidity and foolishness of human beings generally and specially those many alleged top genius (mathematicians, physicians, philosophers, logicians, thinkers, politicians, ...etc), so unfortunately, for sure
Now, Is it truly possible that human minds are generally so naive up to this limit of stupidity? wonder!
Taking into account that there are indeed rare exceptions to every rules fore sure
So, being apparently better than monkeys doesn't prove at all that humans are intelligent beings, for sure
BKK
And truly and so unfortunately and very foolishly (I must confess) that I was giving those creatures many bigger things during my stay here since 2004, thinking that those creatures are honest and clever and would understand immediately from Big, hints, Big formulas, Big conjectures, Big facts with Big easy rigorous proofs they had never heard about it in their meaningless life,
but I was so shocked and surprised that they were suffering so badly from much lesser things that never occured to my mind, they are suffering basically from unlimited foolishness to a case of mentally retarded people, they were suffering too badly from their so little and very negligible egoistic problems, they were suffering from big selfishness beyond limits, many more psychological issues they are suffering so badly now
So, what is going on with those extinct creatures? wonder!
How the devils had made them so empty heads like that and without any ethics and convinced them that they are the smartest people after all? wonder!
So, what is really going on with those people? wonder!
Are they truly victims of the devils actions or devils themselves? wonder!
So, here is the whole problem again? For sure
BKK
bassam king karzeddin
2019-03-05 08:58:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by b***@gmail.com
BTW, even if there were a super being with
a lot of neurons, this would be bounded by
the infinity border 10^604.
So we can say the Greek, with their geometry,
must have been completely out of their minds.
Lets get back to the dark ages
before it, the ages of hand to mouth and not
finite strings: WM
fictitious numbers: BKK
number measurement: JG
infinity border: AP
Post by b***@gmail.com
By the same retrograde amoebic logic, you could not
have geometry. What is lacking is a mechanism where
meaning is assigned to language in a conceptual space.
You could not have Pythagoras Law, since the
{ <a,b,c> | a^2 + b^2 = c^2 }
For sure wonder the concept would not exist, if a,b,c
where allowed to be fictitious real numbers,
since then the set would be uncountable. But also if
we restrict our self to Pythagorean Triples from rational
numbers, the concept wouldn't not exist,
since the set would be still countable infinite,
but we have seen that with finite number of neurons,
the poor amoeba can only measure a few
triples, remember a number is a measurement and
hence the poor amoeba would never enjoy any geometry,
since it lacks a conceptual space.
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
And truly or frankly speaking, this very poor question of mine would immediately reveal unlimited or unimaginable subtle stupidity and foolishness of human beings generally and specially those many alleged top genius (mathematicians, physicians, philosophers, logicians, thinkers, politicians, ...etc), so unfortunately, for sure
Now, Is it truly possible that human minds are generally so naive up to this limit of stupidity? wonder!
Taking into account that there are indeed rare exceptions to every rules fore sure
So, being apparently better than monkeys doesn't prove at all that humans are intelligent beings, for sure
BKK
And truly and so unfortunately and very foolishly (I must confess) that I was giving those creatures many bigger things during my stay here since 2004, thinking that those creatures are honest and clever and would understand immediately from Big, hints, Big formulas, Big conjectures, Big facts with Big easy rigorous proofs they had never heard about it in their meaningless life,
but I was so shocked and surprised that they were suffering so badly from much lesser things that never occured to my mind, they are suffering basically from unlimited foolishness to a case of mentally retarded people, they were suffering too badly from their so little and very negligible egoistic problems, they were suffering from big selfishness beyond limits, many more psychological issues they are suffering so badly now
So, what is going on with those extinct creatures? wonder!
How the devils had made them so empty heads like that and without any ethics and convinced them that they are the smartest people after all? wonder!
So, what is really going on with those people? wonder!
Are they truly victims of the devils actions or devils themselves? wonder!
So, here is the whole problem again? For sure
BKK
So, when shall you realize that this is not any real number (21.31□)? no wonder!

And we know that YOU know that isn't any real number, FOR SURE

Otherwise, bring here your ever greatest (living but hiding) teachers for a very good elementary LESSON in numbers, FOR SURE

BKK
bassam karzeddin
2023-09-26 07:53:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
And truly or frankly speaking, this very poor question of mine would immediately reveal unlimited or unimaginable subtle stupidity and foolishness of human beings generally and specially those many alleged top genius (mathematicians, physicians, philosophers, logicians, thinkers, politicians, ...etc), so unfortunately, for sure
Now, Is it truly possible that human minds are generally so naive up to this limit of stupidity? wonder!
Taking into account that there are indeed rare exceptions to every rules fore sure
So, being apparently better than monkeys doesn't prove at all that humans are intelligent beings, for sure
BKK
And truly and so unfortunately and very foolishly (I must confess) that I was giving those creatures many bigger things during my stay here since 2004, thinking that those creatures are honest and clever and would understand immediately from Big, hints, Big formulas, Big conjectures, Big facts with Big easy rigorous proofs they had never heard about it in their meaningless life,
but I was so shocked and surprised that they were suffering so badly from much lesser things that never occured to my mind, they are suffering basically from unlimited foolishness to a case of mentally retarded people, they were suffering too badly from their so little and very negligible egoistic problems, they were suffering from big selfishness beyond limits, many more psychological issues they are suffering so badly now
So, what is going on with those extinct creatures? wonder!
How the devils had made them so empty heads like that and without any ethics and convinced them that they are the smartest people after all? wonder!
So, what is really going on with those people? wonder!
Are they truly victims of the devils actions or devils themselves? wonder!
So, here is the whole problem again? For sure
BKK
Y
Zelos Malum
2017-12-28 11:51:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Yes you are an idiot, we all agree.
bassam king karzeddin
2018-01-06 09:28:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
So, if a finite sequence of digits (wit or without a decimal notation), with only one missing digit doesn't strictly represent a number, then how come with a sequence of digits that is missing always infinite sequence of digits, wonder!

But hey, this is happening only in YOUR MODERN mathematics, For sure

BKK
bassam king karzeddin
2018-02-12 14:05:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
So, the stubborn professionals morons refuse deliberately to understand anything intriguing but against their rubbish beliefs, sure

BKK
bassam king karzeddin
2018-02-20 15:52:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
The biggest puzzle for you GENIOUS, isn't it? wonder!

BKK
bassam king karzeddin
2018-11-15 15:35:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Go and tell them that being with only a missing single digit you deny me as a number, but if I was with endless missing digits then would be a number

What a wonderful logic professional mathematician have really? wonder!

Where are you (carpenters, farmers, logicians, philosophers, physicians, scientists, engineers, politicians, comedians, singers, footballers, Journalists, ...etc)

Are you truly sleeping for so many long centuries from those many big Jokes manufactured strictly by many alleged genius mathematicians? wonder!

Why not the comedians make the best films out of those funny jokes?

Or is it much higher than your standard of low level of intellectuality that you can never comprehend? for sure

So, let the footballers laugh loudly since they were never interested in such mental cases, sure

BKK
bassam king karzeddin
2019-04-17 12:36:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Then what was the original question or answer?

Oops, it is within the same question itself FOR SURE
BKK
bassam king karzeddin
2019-05-01 16:08:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
You truly must take this course, sure
BKK
bassam king karzeddin
2019-05-22 07:08:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
bassam king karzeddin
2019-06-11 16:00:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
bassam king karzeddin
2019-06-24 13:29:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
bassam king karzeddin
2019-06-27 17:25:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Python
2019-06-27 23:16:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
You are mentally retarded, aren't you, Bassam?

You just have reposted your signature as only content...

Time to get help from a Doctor, Bassam the idiot?
bassam king karzeddin
2019-07-07 07:25:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Python
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
You are mentally retarded, aren't you, Bassam?
You just have reposted your signature as only content...
Time to get help from a Doctor, Bassam the idiot?
Repetition would certainly one day teach the donkeys of mathematics, FOR SURE
BKK
bassam king karzeddin
2019-07-10 11:18:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Mainstream mathematicians must pay lots of attention to the very elementary issues in their mathematics, in order to not fall again into too many fictions that last for thousands of years or many centuries, FOR SURE
BKK
Simply Curious
2019-07-11 06:16:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Mainstream mathematicians must pay lots of attention to the very elementary issues in their mathematics, in order to not fall again into too many fictions that last for thousands of years or many centuries, FOR SURE
BKK
Might you consider, consider there have been centuries and centuries of mathematicians exposed to said idea, these 'very elementary issues' and yet next to none took your side, could it be that...

you are wrong?
bassam king karzeddin
2019-07-11 08:43:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Simply Curious
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Mainstream mathematicians must pay lots of attention to the very elementary issues in their mathematics, in order to not fall again into too many fictions that last for thousands of years or many centuries, FOR SURE
BKK
Might you consider, consider there have been centuries and centuries of mathematicians exposed to said idea, these 'very elementary issues' and yet next to none took your side, could it be that...
you are wrong?
You simply curious came recently here and it so clear that you have missed so many things that had been proved **RIGORIOUSLLU* and more funnily by too **ELEMENTARY** proofs, where No one could ever challenge them

Don't think that I'm so happy with my still standing challenges to all mathematicians on earth, but very sad to discover the so *bitter* facts about the *fake* intellectuality of professional mathematicians generally

On the contrary, I would be too glad to be proven wrong with any one of the still standing challenges that I have no time to keep repeating it and reteaching it separately to everyone to be convinced even ***SECRETLY***, since they are there freely available a few seconds away from everybody (in my posts)

And to give you a very good *HINT* to start, just try to understand the following but without being so biased to anything else except *true* mathematics since you seem to be a book author of mathematics books, Wonder!

**The BIG HINT FOR YOU TO RECOVER AND GET COMPLETELY HEALED FOR SURE**

Think about why do we have an exact existing triangle with sides
(1, 1, Sqrt(2)), but No triangle ever exists with sides (1, 1, 1.4142135623...)

Where (1.4142135623...) is the equivalent decimal representation of sqrt(2) in *YOUR* modern mathematics

LARGER HINT: this had been solved by me quite many times in my posts, but you do try yourself first in order to gain the new super insight that almost all the mathematicians miss so miserably for sure

If you truly understand this problem, then I would guarantee you a new brain where you would throw away the older one that was so polluted with those many fictions we are revealing for day and night since years, for sure

And this would give you a better chance of publishing new books and never like before
Good luck
BKK
j4n bur53
2019-07-11 10:51:48 UTC
Permalink
FOR SURE, WONDER, Ha Ha.

You are even more imbecil than gaylord
bird brain John Garbageiel.
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by Simply Curious
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Mainstream mathematicians must pay lots of attention to the very elementary issues in their mathematics, in order to not fall again into too many fictions that last for thousands of years or many centuries, FOR SURE
BKK
Might you consider, consider there have been centuries and centuries of mathematicians exposed to said idea, these 'very elementary issues' and yet next to none took your side, could it be that...
you are wrong?
You simply curious came recently here and it so clear that you have missed so many things that had been proved **RIGORIOUSLLU* and more funnily by too **ELEMENTARY** proofs, where No one could ever challenge them
Don't think that I'm so happy with my still standing challenges to all mathematicians on earth, but very sad to discover the so *bitter* facts about the *fake* intellectuality of professional mathematicians generally
On the contrary, I would be too glad to be proven wrong with any one of the still standing challenges that I have no time to keep repeating it and reteaching it separately to everyone to be convinced even ***SECRETLY***, since they are there freely available a few seconds away from everybody (in my posts)
And to give you a very good *HINT* to start, just try to understand the following but without being so biased to anything else except *true* mathematics since you seem to be a book author of mathematics books, Wonder!
**The BIG HINT FOR YOU TO RECOVER AND GET COMPLETELY HEALED FOR SURE**
Think about why do we have an exact existing triangle with sides
(1, 1, Sqrt(2)), but No triangle ever exists with sides (1, 1, 1.4142135623...)
Where (1.4142135623...) is the equivalent decimal representation of sqrt(2) in *YOUR* modern mathematics
LARGER HINT: this had been solved by me quite many times in my posts, but you do try yourself first in order to gain the new super insight that almost all the mathematicians miss so miserably for sure
If you truly understand this problem, then I would guarantee you a new brain where you would throw away the older one that was so polluted with those many fictions we are revealing for day and night since years, for sure
And this would give you a better chance of publishing new books and never like before
Good luck
BKK
bassam king karzeddin
2019-07-11 11:08:07 UTC
Permalink
"No brain" bird j4n bur5***** is tirelessly trying to prevent the too innocent minds to have any little chance to see the shining truth that he saw many times but keep denying it so shamefully as always as usual

He is a human of a dwarf Devil type where anyone can see in this serious numerical example

He simply thinks that mainstream readers are generally BIG FOOLS not to understand this too elementary issue, where then he fills the gap by his mostly rubbish sources FOR SURE

And I don't know why does he keep coming on every occasion despite being defeated so many times? wonder!

It seems that is his Job here on sci. math, with No wonder!

BKK
Post by j4n bur53
FOR SURE, WONDER, Ha Ha.
You are even more imbecil than gaylord
bird brain John Garbageiel.
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by Simply Curious
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Mainstream mathematicians must pay lots of attention to the very elementary issues in their mathematics, in order to not fall again into too many fictions that last for thousands of years or many centuries, FOR SURE
BKK
Might you consider, consider there have been centuries and centuries of mathematicians exposed to said idea, these 'very elementary issues' and yet next to none took your side, could it be that...
you are wrong?
You simply curious came recently here and it so clear that you have missed so many things that had been proved **RIGORIOUSLLU* and more funnily by too **ELEMENTARY** proofs, where No one could ever challenge them
Don't think that I'm so happy with my still standing challenges to all mathematicians on earth, but very sad to discover the so *bitter* facts about the *fake* intellectuality of professional mathematicians generally
On the contrary, I would be too glad to be proven wrong with any one of the still standing challenges that I have no time to keep repeating it and reteaching it separately to everyone to be convinced even ***SECRETLY***, since they are there freely available a few seconds away from everybody (in my posts)
And to give you a very good *HINT* to start, just try to understand the following but without being so biased to anything else except *true* mathematics since you seem to be a book author of mathematics books, Wonder!
**The BIG HINT FOR YOU TO RECOVER AND GET COMPLETELY HEALED FOR SURE**
Think about why do we have an exact existing triangle with sides
(1, 1, Sqrt(2)), but No triangle ever exists with sides (1, 1, 1.4142135623...)
Where (1.4142135623...) is the equivalent decimal representation of sqrt(2) in *YOUR* modern mathematics
LARGER HINT: this had been solved by me quite many times in my posts, but you do try yourself first in order to gain the new super insight that almost all the mathematicians miss so miserably for sure
If you truly understand this problem, then I would guarantee you a new brain where you would throw away the older one that was so polluted with those many fictions we are revealing for day and night since years, for sure
And this would give you a better chance of publishing new books and never like before
Good luck
BKK
markus...@gmail.com
2023-07-28 20:11:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by Simply Curious
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Mainstream mathematicians must pay lots of attention to the very elementary issues in their mathematics, in order to not fall again into too many fictions that last for thousands of years or many centuries, FOR SURE
BKK
Might you consider, consider there have been centuries and centuries of mathematicians exposed to said idea, these 'very elementary issues' and yet next to none took your side, could it be that...
you are wrong?
You simply curious came recently here and it so clear that you have missed so many things that had been proved **RIGORIOUSLLU* and more funnily by too **ELEMENTARY** proofs, where No one could ever challenge them
Don't think that I'm so happy with my still standing challenges to all mathematicians on earth, but very sad to discover the so *bitter* facts about the *fake* intellectuality of professional mathematicians generally
On the contrary, I would be too glad to be proven wrong with any one of the still standing challenges that I have no time to keep repeating it and reteaching it separately to everyone to be convinced even ***SECRETLY***, since they are there freely available a few seconds away from everybody (in my posts)
And to give you a very good *HINT* to start, just try to understand the following but without being so biased to anything else except *true* mathematics since you seem to be a book author of mathematics books, Wonder!
**The BIG HINT FOR YOU TO RECOVER AND GET COMPLETELY HEALED FOR SURE**
Think about why do we have an exact existing triangle with sides
(1, 1, Sqrt(2)), but No triangle ever exists with sides (1, 1, 1.4142135623...)
Where (1.4142135623...) is the equivalent decimal representation of sqrt(2) in *YOUR* modern mathematics
LARGER HINT: this had been solved by me quite many times in my posts, but you do try yourself first in order to gain the new super insight that almost all the mathematicians miss so miserably for sure
If you truly understand this problem, then I would guarantee you a new brain where you would throw away the older one that was so polluted with those many fictions we are revealing for day and night since years, for sure
And this would give you a better chance of publishing new books and never like before
Good luck
BKK
Of course a such triangle exists. You even gave its coordinates.
bassam karzeddin
2023-07-31 02:46:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@gmail.com
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by Simply Curious
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Mainstream mathematicians must pay lots of attention to the very elementary issues in their mathematics, in order to not fall again into too many fictions that last for thousands of years or many centuries, FOR SURE
BKK
Might you consider, consider there have been centuries and centuries of mathematicians exposed to said idea, these 'very elementary issues' and yet next to none took your side, could it be that...
you are wrong?
You simply curious came recently here and it so clear that you have missed so many things that had been proved **RIGORIOUSLLU* and more funnily by too **ELEMENTARY** proofs, where No one could ever challenge them
Don't think that I'm so happy with my still standing challenges to all mathematicians on earth, but very sad to discover the so *bitter* facts about the *fake* intellectuality of professional mathematicians generally
On the contrary, I would be too glad to be proven wrong with any one of the still standing challenges that I have no time to keep repeating it and reteaching it separately to everyone to be convinced even ***SECRETLY***, since they are there freely available a few seconds away from everybody (in my posts)
And to give you a very good *HINT* to start, just try to understand the following but without being so biased to anything else except *true* mathematics since you seem to be a book author of mathematics books, Wonder!
**The BIG HINT FOR YOU TO RECOVER AND GET COMPLETELY HEALED FOR SURE**
Think about why do we have an exact existing triangle with sides
(1, 1, Sqrt(2)), but No triangle ever exists with sides (1, 1, 1.4142135623...)
Where (1.4142135623...) is the equivalent decimal representation of sqrt(2) in *YOUR* modern mathematics
LARGER HINT: this had been solved by me quite many times in my posts, but you do try yourself first in order to gain the new super insight that almost all the mathematicians miss so miserably for sure
If you truly understand this problem, then I would guarantee you a new brain where you would throw away the older one that was so polluted with those many fictions we are revealing for day and night since years, for sure
And this would give you a better chance of publishing new books and never like before
Good luck
BKK
Of course a such triangle exists. You even gave its coordinates.
Do you mean the triangle that has at least one of its angles equals EXACTLY to an angle as (2*Pi/9 = 40) Degrees? Or an angle like 31 degrees, ...., etc

No, they never exist in any existing Triangle for more than sure

And I know that humans generally can't understand these new issues & proven discoveries, mainly for their inheereted incurable mental retardation

Since they had been mised for many thousands years & Babylon times until tomorrow...?

Sure you can't understand anything then

Bassam Karzeddin
markus...@gmail.com
2023-07-31 17:35:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam karzeddin
Post by ***@gmail.com
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by Simply Curious
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Mainstream mathematicians must pay lots of attention to the very elementary issues in their mathematics, in order to not fall again into too many fictions that last for thousands of years or many centuries, FOR SURE
BKK
Might you consider, consider there have been centuries and centuries of mathematicians exposed to said idea, these 'very elementary issues' and yet next to none took your side, could it be that...
you are wrong?
You simply curious came recently here and it so clear that you have missed so many things that had been proved **RIGORIOUSLLU* and more funnily by too **ELEMENTARY** proofs, where No one could ever challenge them
Don't think that I'm so happy with my still standing challenges to all mathematicians on earth, but very sad to discover the so *bitter* facts about the *fake* intellectuality of professional mathematicians generally
On the contrary, I would be too glad to be proven wrong with any one of the still standing challenges that I have no time to keep repeating it and reteaching it separately to everyone to be convinced even ***SECRETLY***, since they are there freely available a few seconds away from everybody (in my posts)
And to give you a very good *HINT* to start, just try to understand the following but without being so biased to anything else except *true* mathematics since you seem to be a book author of mathematics books, Wonder!
**The BIG HINT FOR YOU TO RECOVER AND GET COMPLETELY HEALED FOR SURE**
Think about why do we have an exact existing triangle with sides
(1, 1, Sqrt(2)), but No triangle ever exists with sides (1, 1, 1.4142135623...)
Where (1.4142135623...) is the equivalent decimal representation of sqrt(2) in *YOUR* modern mathematics
LARGER HINT: this had been solved by me quite many times in my posts, but you do try yourself first in order to gain the new super insight that almost all the mathematicians miss so miserably for sure
If you truly understand this problem, then I would guarantee you a new brain where you would throw away the older one that was so polluted with those many fictions we are revealing for day and night since years, for sure
And this would give you a better chance of publishing new books and never like before
Good luck
BKK
Of course a such triangle exists. You even gave its coordinates.
Do you mean the triangle that has at least one of its angles equals EXACTLY to an angle as (2*Pi/9 = 40) Degrees? Or an angle like 31 degrees, ...., etc
No, they never exist in any existing Triangle for more than sure
And I know that humans generally can't understand these new issues & proven discoveries, mainly for their inheereted incurable mental retardation
Since they had been mised for many thousands years & Babylon times until tomorrow...?
Sure you can't understand anything then
Bassam Karzeddin
2pi/9 is an exact number.
bassam karzeddin
2023-08-14 03:10:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@gmail.com
Post by bassam karzeddin
Post by ***@gmail.com
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by Simply Curious
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Mainstream mathematicians must pay lots of attention to the very elementary issues in their mathematics, in order to not fall again into too many fictions that last for thousands of years or many centuries, FOR SURE
BKK
Might you consider, consider there have been centuries and centuries of mathematicians exposed to said idea, these 'very elementary issues' and yet next to none took your side, could it be that...
you are wrong?
You simply curious came recently here and it so clear that you have missed so many things that had been proved **RIGORIOUSLLU* and more funnily by too **ELEMENTARY** proofs, where No one could ever challenge them
Don't think that I'm so happy with my still standing challenges to all mathematicians on earth, but very sad to discover the so *bitter* facts about the *fake* intellectuality of professional mathematicians generally
On the contrary, I would be too glad to be proven wrong with any one of the still standing challenges that I have no time to keep repeating it and reteaching it separately to everyone to be convinced even ***SECRETLY***, since they are there freely available a few seconds away from everybody (in my posts)
And to give you a very good *HINT* to start, just try to understand the following but without being so biased to anything else except *true* mathematics since you seem to be a book author of mathematics books, Wonder!
**The BIG HINT FOR YOU TO RECOVER AND GET COMPLETELY HEALED FOR SURE**
Think about why do we have an exact existing triangle with sides
(1, 1, Sqrt(2)), but No triangle ever exists with sides (1, 1, 1.4142135623...)
Where (1.4142135623...) is the equivalent decimal representation of sqrt(2) in *YOUR* modern mathematics
LARGER HINT: this had been solved by me quite many times in my posts, but you do try yourself first in order to gain the new super insight that almost all the mathematicians miss so miserably for sure
If you truly understand this problem, then I would guarantee you a new brain where you would throw away the older one that was so polluted with those many fictions we are revealing for day and night since years, for sure
And this would give you a better chance of publishing new books and never like before
Good luck
BKK
Of course a such triangle exists. You even gave its coordinates.
Do you mean the triangle that has at least one of its angles equals EXACTLY to an angle as (2*Pi/9 = 40) Degrees? Or an angle like 31 degrees, ...., etc
No, they never exist in any existing Triangle for more than sure
And I know that humans generally can't understand these new issues & proven discoveries, mainly for their inheereted incurable mental retardation
Since they had been mised for many thousands years & Babylon times until tomorrow...?
Sure you can't understand anything then
Bassam Karzeddin
2pi/9 is an exact number.
2pi/9 isn't a number nor it is any existing angle Moron

Didn't you hear yet about the irrefutable proof published in my posts?

BKK 🔊
Chris M. Thomasson
2023-08-14 03:26:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam karzeddin
Post by ***@gmail.com
Post by bassam karzeddin
Post by ***@gmail.com
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by Simply Curious
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Mainstream mathematicians must pay lots of attention to the very elementary issues in their mathematics, in order to not fall again into too many fictions that last for thousands of years or many centuries, FOR SURE
BKK
Might you consider, consider there have been centuries and centuries of mathematicians exposed to said idea, these 'very elementary issues' and yet next to none took your side, could it be that...
you are wrong?
You simply curious came recently here and it so clear that you have missed so many things that had been proved **RIGORIOUSLLU* and more funnily by too **ELEMENTARY** proofs, where No one could ever challenge them
Don't think that I'm so happy with my still standing challenges to all mathematicians on earth, but very sad to discover the so *bitter* facts about the *fake* intellectuality of professional mathematicians generally
On the contrary, I would be too glad to be proven wrong with any one of the still standing challenges that I have no time to keep repeating it and reteaching it separately to everyone to be convinced even ***SECRETLY***, since they are there freely available a few seconds away from everybody (in my posts)
And to give you a very good *HINT* to start, just try to understand the following but without being so biased to anything else except *true* mathematics since you seem to be a book author of mathematics books, Wonder!
**The BIG HINT FOR YOU TO RECOVER AND GET COMPLETELY HEALED FOR SURE**
Think about why do we have an exact existing triangle with sides
(1, 1, Sqrt(2)), but No triangle ever exists with sides (1, 1, 1.4142135623...)
Where (1.4142135623...) is the equivalent decimal representation of sqrt(2) in *YOUR* modern mathematics
LARGER HINT: this had been solved by me quite many times in my posts, but you do try yourself first in order to gain the new super insight that almost all the mathematicians miss so miserably for sure
If you truly understand this problem, then I would guarantee you a new brain where you would throw away the older one that was so polluted with those many fictions we are revealing for day and night since years, for sure
And this would give you a better chance of publishing new books and never like before
Good luck
BKK
Of course a such triangle exists. You even gave its coordinates.
Do you mean the triangle that has at least one of its angles equals EXACTLY to an angle as (2*Pi/9 = 40) Degrees? Or an angle like 31 degrees, ...., etc
No, they never exist in any existing Triangle for more than sure
And I know that humans generally can't understand these new issues & proven discoveries, mainly for their inheereted incurable mental retardation
Since they had been mised for many thousands years & Babylon times until tomorrow...?
Sure you can't understand anything then
Bassam Karzeddin
2pi/9 is an exact number.
2pi/9 isn't a number nor it is any existing angle Moron
360 / 9 = 40

A 40 degree angle. Why do you seem to have such a hard time with it?
Post by bassam karzeddin
Didn't you hear yet about the irrefutable proof published in my posts?
BKK 🔊
bassam king karzeddin
2019-07-21 09:07:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Are you still very found of numbers that you don't know a few numbers of its digits? wonder!

And even you planed IT to know all OF its digits, it doesn't work any more even with school kids FOR SURE

BKK
bassam king karzeddin
2019-11-06 18:52:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
bassam karzeddin
2020-06-29 13:09:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
And what about that (GUESS what)? no wonders

BKK
bassam karzeddin
2020-08-04 18:23:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Python
2020-08-04 18:54:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
This is far the most insightful post you've ever made, Idiot
Demented Schizophrenic Bassam Karzeddin, quoting only
your signature from 2017. How can you be THAT an idiot, Bassam?
bassam karzeddin
2020-09-10 14:11:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
bassam karzeddin
2023-07-28 11:48:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Didn't the idiots realize themse
lves yet? Wonders!
BKK
bassam karzeddin
2023-09-08 23:51:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
bassam karzeddin
2023-09-20 22:27:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
How do the academic Trolls 🧌 feel about it?

But mathematickers usually don't feel anything 😑!

BKK
bassam karzeddin
2023-10-20 11:49:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Dec. 27th, 2017
Usually; any eingineering calculations or any eingineering approximations seems as a true mathematics for mathematicians, simply because it includes numbers & some mathematical symbols

And they can't understand yet that thire math was made by non-mathematicians FOR SURE

BKK

Loading...