ahahahahaha... AAHAHAHA... ahahaha... ROTFLMAO
Fergerson "***@bid.nes" <***@gmail.com>
in which "Ferger" comes from the Medieval German
"Fergeher" and means "Petty Criminal", which is a
Yehiel .y.Porat wrote:
'SPACE CANNOT EVEN BE **detected **
IF THERE IS NO some MASS IN IT !!'
!!'2 let us even FORGET ABOUT THINKING about
**doing anything or even something **done** with it
IF IT IS NOT BEEN DETECTED (without mass )
Sylvia Else wrote:
Wave around a big stick. If it doesn't hit anything,
you've detected some space.
Eleftherios Papageorgiou wrote
Common error done by women.
What you'll detect would be EMPTY space,
Sylvia Else wrote:
Whereas you're offering yourself as an example of
linguistic competence in men?
Post by ***@bid.nesPost by ***@bid.nesNice anti-sexism smackdown, but irrelevant...
Sylvia Else wrote:
Space would be detected, which contradicts
"space cannot even be detected..." as was my point.
Ferger wrote:
You don't need a stick (which is mass, which I think was related to the
Post by ***@bid.nesclaim you were disputing). Just pick two points, shine a light from one to
the other, and time its passage. If it takes zero time there's no space;
otherwise there is. No matter required.
hanson wrote:
You measured the DISTANCE between 2 points of mass,
the distance bewtween the massive light emitter and
the massive phonton recever, but
NOT a property of space. ROTFLMAO
Post by ***@bid.nesSpace is obviously detected by it's properties. Space has many
properties. Even Einstein said so.
hanson wrote:
Benj don't be so sarcastic. You confuse the Einstein
Dingleberries. Mentioning Einstein just adds to
to their psychotic & lunatic Belief system which
was a fad during the early 1900's when
. *** Einstein fucked with their minds, ***
and hypnotized them until they could no longer
distinguish whether something has already happened
or something is still going to happen. which Einstein
brilliantly accomplished with this tripe here:
||| AE:: "People like us, who _BELIEVE_ in physics,
||| AE:: know that the distinction between the
||| AE:: past, resent, and future is only a stubbornly
||| AE:: persistent illusion."
||| AE:: "Space & time are NOT conditions in which we
||| AE:: live; they are simply modes in which we think."
.... ahahahaha... brillant con! Great wool over their eyes!
Mark L. Fergerson wrote:
Well sure; its (space's) dielectric constant and magnetic permeability can
be independently measured too, as well as its gravitational constant (and of
course more "exotic" properties). I just chose simple time-of-light-flight
because it's too clear to misunderstand, and I wasn't sure how much of the
other stuff, uh, some people might be able to grasp. Not you, I know that
you know better.
hanson wrote:
e0 & /u0 measure the electric flux between 2 Masses IN space,
NOT the space.
With "G" one measures the Force between 2 Masses IN space.
Not the space.
--- [ Porat 1 -:- Einstein Dingleberries 0, zilch, nada ]--