Post by Arny KruegerPost by Bruce J. RichmanApparently for people like Krueger and McKelvy, there is something
terribly threatening to them about having a licensed psychologist
evaluate their online behavior.
Delusions of grandeur noted.
Inability to comprehend and/or understand English clearly noted. There is
obviously nothing in the above observation concerning Krueger & McKelvy's
likely motives for attacking psychologists that is either delusional or
grandiose. Claims of any such properties by Kruegter simply provide more
evidence for therory being advaqnced here that evaluation of their online
behavior by licensed psychologists is tthreatening to them and therefore
triggers unprovoked personal attacks in retaliation.
Post by Arny KruegerPost by Bruce J. RichmanThat explains, in large measure,
their attempts to slander both psychologists that have posted on RAO
(there may have been others, but of that I would be unaware).
It's not a matter of slander, its a matter of pointing out how completely
one-sided your behavior is here, Richman. You turn a blind eye to deviant
behavior by people that you agree with and lavish personal attacks on those
that you disagree with, cloaking them with pop psychology-type prose.
A totally false and flawed analysis, Krueger. First of all, there is no
pop-psychology prose being used, and your prior record of attacking the field
pf psychology and those that practice that profession are well known. Secondly,
you havge a documented record, as does McKelvy of slanderin myself, Scott
Wheeler (who is now suing you for libel), and numerous other individuals on RAO
by making deframatory comments about their real-life professional activities
despite no knowledge of same. You also have constantly endorsed and
embellisdhed the deviant behavior of Michael McKelvy, so your claims that I
ignore deviant behavior of others hypocritical and self-serving in extremis.
Everybody on RAO, of course, ignores numerous types of behavior that could be
called deviant. Of course, in your case, given your huge number of deviant
posts, many of chosen *not* to ignore it.
Post by Arny KruegerAs you correctly point out, it is difficult for people like Krueger,
Post by Bruce J. Richmanwho exhibits many symptoms, at least online, of paranoid personality
disorder, to trust others.
Wrong again, Richman. You're losing credibility points like there's no
tomorrow because you've obviously confused RAO with the real world.
Prove it. Comments made about your paranoid conspiracy theories, constant
allusion to "cliques", sockpuppets, etc. refer to your online behavior only.
Unlike you, who is now being sued for libel by claiming that one of the RAO
posters is a pedophile in the real world, I have never offered a formal
diagnosis of your condition since I have never met you facer to face.
Post by Arny KruegerPost by Bruce J. RichmanThis has been exhbited in his conspiracy
theories about John Atkinson, audiophile publications, cliques on
RAO, etc.
In many cases the existence and activities of the conspiracies are
well-documented in the google archives.
Prove that John Atkinson and/or any of the audiophile publications that you
have mentioned are involved in conspiracies. All that is documented in the
Google archives are your unsubstantiated accusations against Mr. Atkinson and
others.
The existence of cliques on RAO is
Post by Arny Kruegerobvious to anybody who dirties their eyes by observing this place for a
while. Indeed, Richman himself engages in this kind of behavior himself
when he turns a blind eye to the more deviant behavior around here.
When most people see the word, clique, they probably assume that it involves a
group of people that have met, perhaps associate with each other socially,
and/or share a number of common interests and values. In the case of RAO,
which appears to be your "real world" during most of your waking life, no such
cliques have ever been proven to exist. Speaking for myself, I have neither
met nor communicated personally witrh hardly anybody here. And since Krueger
labels almost all behavior that does endorse anti-preference,
anti-subjectivist, anti-tube, anti-vinyl ideas as "deviant', practically all
RAO posters, in his unrealistic and distorted view, are ignoring deviant
behavior.
Post by Arny KruegerRichman has a lengthy track record for ignoring the obviously serious mental
"My claim is that Susan Kroobitch is not takin in enough
dough from her nightly rounds in the back alleys there
in Detroit. What a stupid cunt. Therefore here's a thing
to do: Have a gynecologist and proctologist detach, retouch
and reattach her vagina away from her asshole and stitch
them both back to their normal, original position. That
might do the trick. Then have the pastor from your local
church give that wrinkled gaping vagina his blessing by
asking her next Sunday to come forward during the mass
and order her to spread her pussy apart in front of the
congregation for everyones full view. If the pastor's cock
rise immediately after pulling his own pants down while
standing next to her, that means she has his blessing.
She is good to go, you incoherent, staggering cumstain.
That's the advice for Arnii Kroofuck the embittered
pederast."
In other words, krueger is now trying to advance the ridiculousd theory that is
my responsisiblity to serve as a monitor for the posts of others that attack
him. Given the large number of people that have attacked Krueger over the
years because of his unprovoked hostility, arrogance, and compulsive lying
about them, no person would be or should be able to read or comment upon every
anti-Kruegerr post on RAO. That, of course, would be a full time job, and for
most of us, that is not a raalistic option.
Post by Arny KruegerBruce Richman by his silence, would have us believe that the previous
paragraph was written by a perfectly happy individual that is normal in
every way.
Arny Krueger,, in making the above false claim and obvious lie, is now engaged
in mind-reading, a laughable behavior that he has tried to use to con people on
RAO many times in the past. Krueger has now advanced the totally irrational
and illogical argument that a person who does not comment on a post attacking
him, is by their silence, endorsing it. This, of course, is typical of the
type of paranoid thinking that consumes him.
Indeed, the poor wretch that posts as "JBorg" is obviously as
Post by Arny Kruegernormal and happy as Bruce Richman.
An obvious lie, since Krueger has no knowledge nor any evidence to support this
assumption and attempt at mind-reading that he has made.
When a person, such as Krueger, makes the claim that I (or anybody else for
that matter) ignores the posts of others who attack him because we approve of
them and/or "endorse" them, he is of course lying. Such claims, however, have
a very paranoid flavor in the opinion of most who rread them. They are just
another example of the type of conspiracy theory logic that permeates the
thinking and actions on RAO of indiviudlas like Arny Krueger.
Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist