elmjack44
2005-04-02 04:33:28 UTC
The funniest thing about dealing with rabid WC adherents is the
complete lack of basic logic. It never fails to amaze me how much
chutzpah these "true-believers" have instead of just using the
intelligence with which they were born.
Every time there's a new round of TV specials and/or new books
relegating LHO to history's doghouse I just have to laugh. Here's why.
They all do the same thing, namely try to shoehorn all the 'evidence'
into the ridiculous WC scenario. If any witness disagrees with their
'evidence', they are simply said to be wrong. If the ballistic
'evidence' doesn't match up...hey, let's hammer it into a scenario
that'll work with the WC conclusions, no matter how ridiculous it is.
My goodness!!
Of course, the most hilarious part of these efforts are the
junk-psychology wrap-ups at the end of the program or book. You know,
how people believe in a conspiracy because they simply can't accept the
fact that some young, 'smirking' man could've caused this much grief on
a nation. Um...OK. You're right, (add narrator name like Dan Rather or
Peter Jennings here), there is no evidence of a conspiracy. I just
can't emotionally come to terms with it. You got me!!
Here's what I would like to see. How about an investigation that
doesn't attempt to make everything fit into a pre-existing WC scenario.
Look at everything from a fresh perspective with no biases.
Step One:
Interview as many witnesses from Dealey Plaza as possible. Police
statements, FBI statements, newspaper interviews and so on and so
forth. What do you get?
A. It seems a ton of people heard shots originating from behind the
President. For instance, Howard Brennan said they came from the TSBD.
B. It seems a ton of other people heard shots originating from in front
of the President. For instance, Abe Zapruder and the Newman family said
the shots seemed to come from behind them--tantamount to the Grassy
Knoll area.
There are many, many more witnesses who point to either the front or
the back scenarios. You can't simply dismiss one of these groups of
people. A single person can certainly be mistaken, but it is completely
illogical to say ALL who saw/heard the same thing are wrong. Also, a
large percentage of witnesses heard 2 shots that were very close
together. Bang! Bang! LHO's rifle could not have fired both.
Conclusion: Shots came from a minimum of 2 different locations.
Step Two:
Earnestly interview the doctors and medical personnel from Parkland
Hospital in Dallas. First, they are the ONLY PEOPLE to see the neck
wound before it was obliterated. This is of unbelievable importance.
Every account I have seen puts the wound as an extremely small hole of
entrance. It is a FACT that the autopsy doctors did not know there was
a bullet wound in the neck. They made no efforts to track it. Witnesses
to the autopsy say the back wound was very shallow, only as deep as the
tip of the autopsist's finger. Speaking of the back wound. It was well
below the base of the neck. The WC used incredibly deceptive
illustrations of a bullet wound in the base of the NECK, not lower down
the BACK.
NOTHING, I mean NOTHING, connects the back wound with the neck wound.
The only reason it was invented was to make it fir the WC 3 bullet
scenario. The autopsists did nothing to tie the two wounds to the same
bullet.
Conclusion: The bullet hole to the neck was one of entrance. The ONLY
people who saw it described it as such. Shots came from a minimum of 2
different locations.
Step Three:
Examine the Zapruder film. Emerging from the Stemmons sign, JFK is
already reacting to his neck wound. Connally is then struck with a
bullet. His reaction at the moment he is hit is right there for
everyone to see. Connally was adamant that he was shot by a different
bullet than the one that hit JFK. He never backed down from that and
the Zapruder film proves him correct. What's so hard to understand? The
only reason the SBT was born was to fit the shooting into the WC
scenario. Logic dictates that one bullet hit JFK in the back and a
separate bullet hit Connally.
At one point (forgot which Z frame) JFK moves unnaturally forward in
1/18 of a second. It is very logical to assume he has, at that moment,
been struck in the back. It's a very simple concept.
Just before the head shot at Z313, JFK again moves unnaturally forward
in 1/18 of a second. He is then driven violently backward as his head
seemingly explodes. This fits in perfectly with witnesses hearing 2
almost simultaneous shots. One hits JFK from behind and one hits him
from the front. Again, this is simple logic. The BS of 'jet effect' is
laughable. It was created to try to make things fit the WC scenario. It
doesn't stand up to reason. In a couple of Z frames you can see the
'volcano' area at the back of JFK's head--hair pointed outward.
Obviously an exit wound.
Conclusion: Shots came from a minimum of 2 different locations.
I could go on and on, but I'll stop with these 3 steps. Simple facts.
Simple conclusions. If the true-believing WC buffoons would just start
looking at the evidence with a clean slate, maybe we would get somewhat
closer to what happened that terrible day.
complete lack of basic logic. It never fails to amaze me how much
chutzpah these "true-believers" have instead of just using the
intelligence with which they were born.
Every time there's a new round of TV specials and/or new books
relegating LHO to history's doghouse I just have to laugh. Here's why.
They all do the same thing, namely try to shoehorn all the 'evidence'
into the ridiculous WC scenario. If any witness disagrees with their
'evidence', they are simply said to be wrong. If the ballistic
'evidence' doesn't match up...hey, let's hammer it into a scenario
that'll work with the WC conclusions, no matter how ridiculous it is.
My goodness!!
Of course, the most hilarious part of these efforts are the
junk-psychology wrap-ups at the end of the program or book. You know,
how people believe in a conspiracy because they simply can't accept the
fact that some young, 'smirking' man could've caused this much grief on
a nation. Um...OK. You're right, (add narrator name like Dan Rather or
Peter Jennings here), there is no evidence of a conspiracy. I just
can't emotionally come to terms with it. You got me!!
Here's what I would like to see. How about an investigation that
doesn't attempt to make everything fit into a pre-existing WC scenario.
Look at everything from a fresh perspective with no biases.
Step One:
Interview as many witnesses from Dealey Plaza as possible. Police
statements, FBI statements, newspaper interviews and so on and so
forth. What do you get?
A. It seems a ton of people heard shots originating from behind the
President. For instance, Howard Brennan said they came from the TSBD.
B. It seems a ton of other people heard shots originating from in front
of the President. For instance, Abe Zapruder and the Newman family said
the shots seemed to come from behind them--tantamount to the Grassy
Knoll area.
There are many, many more witnesses who point to either the front or
the back scenarios. You can't simply dismiss one of these groups of
people. A single person can certainly be mistaken, but it is completely
illogical to say ALL who saw/heard the same thing are wrong. Also, a
large percentage of witnesses heard 2 shots that were very close
together. Bang! Bang! LHO's rifle could not have fired both.
Conclusion: Shots came from a minimum of 2 different locations.
Step Two:
Earnestly interview the doctors and medical personnel from Parkland
Hospital in Dallas. First, they are the ONLY PEOPLE to see the neck
wound before it was obliterated. This is of unbelievable importance.
Every account I have seen puts the wound as an extremely small hole of
entrance. It is a FACT that the autopsy doctors did not know there was
a bullet wound in the neck. They made no efforts to track it. Witnesses
to the autopsy say the back wound was very shallow, only as deep as the
tip of the autopsist's finger. Speaking of the back wound. It was well
below the base of the neck. The WC used incredibly deceptive
illustrations of a bullet wound in the base of the NECK, not lower down
the BACK.
NOTHING, I mean NOTHING, connects the back wound with the neck wound.
The only reason it was invented was to make it fir the WC 3 bullet
scenario. The autopsists did nothing to tie the two wounds to the same
bullet.
Conclusion: The bullet hole to the neck was one of entrance. The ONLY
people who saw it described it as such. Shots came from a minimum of 2
different locations.
Step Three:
Examine the Zapruder film. Emerging from the Stemmons sign, JFK is
already reacting to his neck wound. Connally is then struck with a
bullet. His reaction at the moment he is hit is right there for
everyone to see. Connally was adamant that he was shot by a different
bullet than the one that hit JFK. He never backed down from that and
the Zapruder film proves him correct. What's so hard to understand? The
only reason the SBT was born was to fit the shooting into the WC
scenario. Logic dictates that one bullet hit JFK in the back and a
separate bullet hit Connally.
At one point (forgot which Z frame) JFK moves unnaturally forward in
1/18 of a second. It is very logical to assume he has, at that moment,
been struck in the back. It's a very simple concept.
Just before the head shot at Z313, JFK again moves unnaturally forward
in 1/18 of a second. He is then driven violently backward as his head
seemingly explodes. This fits in perfectly with witnesses hearing 2
almost simultaneous shots. One hits JFK from behind and one hits him
from the front. Again, this is simple logic. The BS of 'jet effect' is
laughable. It was created to try to make things fit the WC scenario. It
doesn't stand up to reason. In a couple of Z frames you can see the
'volcano' area at the back of JFK's head--hair pointed outward.
Obviously an exit wound.
Conclusion: Shots came from a minimum of 2 different locations.
I could go on and on, but I'll stop with these 3 steps. Simple facts.
Simple conclusions. If the true-believing WC buffoons would just start
looking at the evidence with a clean slate, maybe we would get somewhat
closer to what happened that terrible day.