Post by 2out3aintbadPost by Ian StuartAnd you know "they" (i.e. the prisoners) did
And "they" (i.e - the terrorist...)
Post by Ian Stuartmust have missed the trial that proved them guilty of such abhorrent acts.
Listen you faggot little piece of brit - you know its true so give up on the
holier-than-thou routine.
I don't know it's true, not if we are referring to the guilt of those
being indefinitely detained in Gitmo. I happen to belong to that old
fashioned school of thought that believes the burden of proof lies with
the accuser. So, until that guilt has been proven beyond reasonable doubt
in a fair and transparent manner I have no option but to consider all of
these detainees innocent. I don't like it, but that's the way it is.
Don't get me wrong. I'm pretty sure a number of them could be proven
guilty of terrorist activities, and if that is ever done you can hang
those individuals for all I care. But until such times I have to wonder
how many of the detainees are genuinely innocent because we just don't
know why they were detained. Was it purely on the say-so of a 20 year old
private who reckons any raghead with a rifle is a terrorist? Was it
because they fell foul of an unscrupulous neighbour attracted by the
reward dollars being handed out by the coalition forces? Was it because
they saw our troops as an invading enemy and tried to defend their land?
That would make them patriots, not terrorists and should at least entitle
them to POW treatment.
Post by 2out3aintbadJust because you guys helped spread insurgent warfare
into every country you ever raped and pillaged back in the day does not mean
that we have to listen to your self-congratulatory BS now.
I really don't know how to respond to such inane dribble. Go read a
history book or two and come back when you have a clue. Ask an adult to
help you with the big words if you get stuck.
Post by 2out3aintbadGo eat dick you
despicable little cocksucker... You and your skanky old queen.
Oh my gawd. He insulted the Queen. I'm cut to the quick, really I am.
Post by 2out3aintbadPost by Ian StuartOK you've sold it to me. It's clearly beyond doubt that, since the
establishment of Camp x-ray, attacks on American personnel by
insurgents/terrorists/AQ affiliated groups have all but fizzled out.
If they let me run the show I guarantee it'd fizzle. Snap and pop too.
I doubt you could run a corner shop. Mind you, you'd probably still do a
better job than your current CIC so maybe we should give you a try.
Post by 2out3aintbadPost by Ian StuartThey're terrorists, it's pretty much expected they will behave in that
So we just allow them to get away with it? Jesus your a fucking idiot. An idiot
wrapped in an imbecile inside a fucktard...
Where did I say let them away with it? I didn't. I would like to be sure
we're punishing "them" though and not some poor unfortunate that happened
to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Post by 2out3aintbadPost by Ian Stuartmanner. We, on the other hand, set ourselves out as civilised people who
When attacked I'd rather win than stand around like a fool questioning our own
morality. Let's just kill those who want to kill us and then we'll slap each
other on the back and congratulate each other for being soooo civilized.
So you'd rather blindly attack than stop and think. Why try to apply
intelligent thought to a situation when you know you're incapable of it
anyway, eh. That's how you end up with the unsolvable mess we've got on
our hands now. You're not an adviser to Dubya by any chance?
Post by 2out3aintbadPost by Ian Stuartbelieve in justice,human rights etc etc etc. We like to think that makes
us better than them.
Problem is that that is all we do. We 'beleive' it makes us better than them.
But we're not. And we're not going to be. We're all just humans. We're all
capable of horrific evil. I just see no fucking point in 'pretending' that it
not us - its them. They're the evil ones - LOL... In my personal opinion I
believe that if we would just agree to wipe their fucking asses off the face of
the earth before we start pretending to be better than them then we might
actually be able to become better than them.
But you don't even know who "they" are do you? I guess you must mean the
tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians that have died as a result of our
complete and utter failure to manage the situation we created. Still,
they're all just ragheads to you aint they. It's not like they're human
beings or anything so why give a shit. You should try wearing a rag on
your head sometime - would do you a world of good keeping the sun off your
neck.
Post by 2out3aintbadBut not now. Not when they're
poking us with sticks and flying planes loaded with innocent civilians into
office building filled with innocent civilians.
Poking with sticks isn't too far from the truth. The attacks of 911 were
perpetrated by a handful of men armed with nothing more sophisticated than
stanley knives. You don't beat people like that by sending in the marines.
I hinted at that in my earlier post when I suggested that those in charge
don't have a clue about strategy. That would be the bit that went over
your head I suppose. I guess it just got lost in amongst all the other
things that routinely go over your head.
Post by 2out3aintbadPost by Ian Stuartif only we actually practiced what we preach.
Kill'em now, preach about it latter...
Well, I guess if we kill enough people we're bound to get some of "them"
in the process. Pity some of ours have to die in the process, but I guess
the 3500+ coalition troops that have died so far are a price you're
willing to pay, fighting the war from your comfy chair.
Post by 2out3aintbadPost by Ian StuartWell, this chump would have liked to have believed you could rise above it
Replace 'chump' with 'punk' and your gold...
Post by Ian Stuartdespite being Americans. It's not looking good so far though. You could
American envy - just like penis envy?
So you reckon "American" is synonymous with "penis"? There was a time I
would have strongly disagreed with you, but the more I get to talk to the
likes of you the more likely I am to come round to your way of thinking.
Post by 2out3aintbadPost by Ian Stuarteasily have prevailed without dropping your standards if your leaders had
half a clue about strategy.
Yep, like when you guys decided it might be best to try to appease der fuhrer.
That worked well.
We tried that, it failed. We recognised our mistake and change tactics.
You could learn a lot from that. BTW, where were you guys when all this
was going on? We declared war when Germany invaded Poland, remember. As I
recall you didn't give a flying shit until it looked like the billions of
dollars you stood to make on the lend/lease deal might be forfeited if we
lost the war. It's all about the money eh?
Post by 2out3aintbadPost by Ian StuartUnfortunately they don't seem to have half a
clue about anything, other than maximising war profits for their cronies.
Right, not that the best way to increase war profits is to fight like little
nancy boys and drag it out to the next fucking century. Are you somehow thinking
that if we just fucking surrender and go home that that will be the end of it.
Praise allah - rotfflmfao...
I'm sure you think there's a point in there somewhere, but I'm buggered if
I know what it is. Feel free to try again. Explain your thoughts to the
adult that's going to help you with those history books and see if he
can't help you make a coherent argument.
Post by 2out3aintbadPost by Ian StuartPost by 2out3aintbadfuck them. Uh, I believe I've made my point.
You've made a point all right, though not the one you intended I suspect.
Well don't be to fucking sure of yourself there nancy boy. Cowardice is often an
unreliable fallback when your back is against the shari law...
Now see there you go, clueless to the end. You see a criticism of a
poorly thought out aggressive response as a blanket criticism of
aggression. You don't get the "poorly thought out" aspect of it at all, do
you.
_____________________________________________________________________
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com