On 11/01/2018 20:40, Hen Hanna wrote:
<not much, snipped>
----
I have to say, this thread has been quite cathartic. It has brought out
many a personal prejudice, least of which are aimed at Hen Hanna's
posting style.
On a positive note - I think there is a gem of an idea in the title of
the thread: "AUE - 10 years ago"
Most newspapers have a column titled "10 years ago today". These reprint
stories published in their columns 10, 50 or even 100 years ago -
bringing a flavour of life and news, as reported by the paper all those
years ago.
I think this is something we can do for posts in AUE, highlighting some
of the memorable posts from the /same week/ 10 years ago.
( I am not the best qualified person to do this here, as my posting
history does not go that far back. However, to set the wheels into
motion, here's a sampler (courtesy of Google Groups) )
----
Example 1
----
From Peter Moylan, posted 13/01/2008
Re: Tap and faucet and spellcheckers [was: Re: What do YOU call the # sign?]
Men either dress for comfort or because some idiot boss decrees a
clothing standard. However, there does appear to be a new breed of
younger men - the sort that wax their legs - who actually take an
interest in fashion.
Given sufficient social pressure, I might just consent to waxing my
legs, but there's no power on earth that would convince me to get a
Brazilian.
--
Peter Moylan, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. http://www.pmoylan.org
For an e-mail address, see my web page.
---
Example 2
---
Mike Lyle, posted 13/1/08
Re: Tap and faucet and spellcheckers [was: Re: What do YOU call the # sign?]
[...]
The certain one, as I mentioned yesterday, is about the cut, and
cuttability, of men's trousers. However skilled your hemming (or
WundaWebbing), you just don't get a viable pair of tailored shorts if
you truncate a pair of long pants: the cut over the thighs is quite
different. Hence my suggestion that he resort to the local
dressmaker.
Hmm. Switching to a dress might be a bit radical, doncha think?
Well, if you pick your spot with care, Oz can be amazingly laid-back
these days.
--
Mike.
------
Last but not least...
Example 3
------
Peter Duncanson (BrE) 16/01/2008
It makes a good
computer table...if you like little wheels on your legs for rolling
sideways.
You know, you can buy shoes with little wheels on them. They are much
more comfortable than wheels on your legs.
I'm not sure surfing-orientation rollerskates would have any advantages
over a skateboard.
"Surfing-orientation rollerskates [1]"?
What's them then?
Skates (the fish) that have a passion for (are orient(ta)ted
to(ward(s)) surfing rollers?
(Roller: a long heavy sea wave as it advances towards the
shore.)
I was thinking more of "heelies".
"roller skates", shirley?
--
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)
---