b***@aol.com
2007-03-08 15:51:03 UTC
Since we've changed topics several times, I decided to begin a fresh
topic from the final posting about Lincoln's Stovepipe Hat.
FROM PREVIOUS POSTING:
I liked how Lincoln dismissed any idea that John
Civil War, and Seeded Civil Rights (Hardcover).
The author of this (effort?) tries to justify John Brown and
enshrine his efforts as being worthy. According to reviewers, every
time he tries to make this point, even his own writing usually reveals
the inaccuracy of that concept. (This book is not on my must read
list, but it illustrates my point.)
Just like this current book, in Lincoln's time, there were those
who wanted to credit John Brown with being the instrument of change
that would eventually bring about the end of slavery. They even sang
songs about him. Lincoln didn't believe that, and set out to expose
Brown for who he was in the Cooper Union Speech. He further used the
example of his hanging as a warning to the South that the Union would
not tolerate rebellion of any kind, and would answer them in the same
way as they had dealt with John Brown.
I imagine that a great many radical Republicans (back then) did
not share Lincoln's opinion of John Brown because of their total
contempt for the South. Like the book's title above, they were
blinded to who he was because they were opposed to slavery anywhere in
the Union.
Rich Wagner
topic from the final posting about Lincoln's Stovepipe Hat.
FROM PREVIOUS POSTING:
I liked how Lincoln dismissed any idea that John
Brown's actions reflected him being a Republican.
Lincoln insisted that he was not!
Any right thinking middle-of-the-road candidate who
wanted to appeal to the broadest constituancy would
have to condemn John brown. He was not just an
insurrectionist, but an anarchist, a terrorist, and cold
blooded murderer...
John Brown, Abolitionist: The Man Who Killed Slavery, Sparked theLincoln insisted that he was not!
Any right thinking middle-of-the-road candidate who
wanted to appeal to the broadest constituancy would
have to condemn John brown. He was not just an
insurrectionist, but an anarchist, a terrorist, and cold
blooded murderer...
Civil War, and Seeded Civil Rights (Hardcover).
The author of this (effort?) tries to justify John Brown and
enshrine his efforts as being worthy. According to reviewers, every
time he tries to make this point, even his own writing usually reveals
the inaccuracy of that concept. (This book is not on my must read
list, but it illustrates my point.)
Just like this current book, in Lincoln's time, there were those
who wanted to credit John Brown with being the instrument of change
that would eventually bring about the end of slavery. They even sang
songs about him. Lincoln didn't believe that, and set out to expose
Brown for who he was in the Cooper Union Speech. He further used the
example of his hanging as a warning to the South that the Union would
not tolerate rebellion of any kind, and would answer them in the same
way as they had dealt with John Brown.
I imagine that a great many radical Republicans (back then) did
not share Lincoln's opinion of John Brown because of their total
contempt for the South. Like the book's title above, they were
blinded to who he was because they were opposed to slavery anywhere in
the Union.
Rich Wagner