claviger
2018-05-30 02:14:18 UTC
JFK Assassination Black Dog Man(Woman)
A modern theory & most likely a solution to the Blackdogman figure in Dealy Plaza
from Jeff Rollins & Robin Unger
1:29
The Venerable Bede
1 year ago (edited)
Without a doubt, two of the most intriguing eyewitnesses to the
assassination, as neither have ever been identified and have maintained
their silence for some 53 years now. God bless them! I know Mike
Brownlow claims to know who they are (Arthur and Evelyn King, who he
claims are brother and sister, not husband and wife). However, Brownlow's
credibility has been questioned repeatedly, and I don't really know what
to make of his statements. But if true, that Evelyn came forward a few
years ago to identify herself and tell Brownlow, a fellow
African-American, what she saw and what they were doing there, then it is
an amazing discovery on Brownlow's part. But again, Brownlow's
credibility is not the best, as he is regarded by many to be a con artist.
On the other hand, if they were actually the young black couple Marilyn
Sitzman said she saw sitting on the bench eating their lunch 15-20 minutes
before the motorcade turned onto Elm St. (and I believe they were, as all
the evidence points to this fact), then this makes for a much more
interesting story in my view, as they have yet to come forward and remain
unidentified to this day. I have no reason to doubt why they haven't come
forward to be identified. To me it makes perfect sense: they feared for
their lives. And who can blame them?
There is no doubt in my mind that this tall, young black man in a light
colored (beige?) jacket and dark trousers captured in the Darnell film
standing with the young black woman holding the baby behind the concrete
wall just minutes after the assassination is the same young, tall black
man that was standing on the steps next to Emmett Hudson and the other
(white) man in the red shirt whose name was F. Lee Mudd. Secret Service
agent Paul Landis identified this young man standing next to Hudson as "a
Negro male in light green slacks and a beige colored shirt." Landis saw
him turn and run up the stairs when the shots were fired. This young
black man's reaction to the shot that struck Kennedy in the head was to
turn immediately and run up the steps. His reaction is consistent with
someone whose concern was, evidently, for the loved ones he left sitting
on the bench at the top of the stairs behind him, which was probably his
young wife and child, if not his sister. The child appears to be about 6
months old. You can also see the lunch bag that was left on the bench
where they were apparently eating their lunch, as Sitzman said they were,
before the president's motorcade arrived.
The only logical deduction is that this young black man simply walked down
the steps a few minutes prior to the president's car turning onto Elm St.
in order to get a better view of the president. Hudson only mentioned the
man sitting next to him (the young black man) on the steps who he struck
up a conversation with, stating the young man was, he estimated, about in
his late twenties. He did not mention the other man, F. Lee Mudd, who was
the man in the red shirt standing a few steps down in front of them. The
reason is obvious. He did not know him and did not speak to him. He only
spoke to the young black man for a few minutes before the president's car
turned onto Elm St. Hudson said at that point they both stood (they were
sitting prior to that), and Hudson's attention was focused entirely on the
motorcade, not the young black man standing next to him who he had just
talked to. When the shots were fired, this young black man immediately
turned and ran up the steps, back in the direction of where the bench was
located, in fear that his young wife (or sister) and child were in harm's
way. They likely remained atop the knoll for 10-15 minutes, blending in
with the crowd. You can see in the Darnell film how the Dallas police
were moving people out of that area. They were clearing the area of
spectators and witnesses. The young black woman is later seen in another
photo (probably 15-20 minutes after the shooting) standing in front of the
entrance to the TSBD where a station had been set up by police to take
testimony from witnesses. She was standing in line holding this same
baby, evidently waiting to tell police what she saw. This young black
couple (whether husband and wife, or brother and sister) evidently walked
away after that and never came forward (understandably) to tell their
story and what they saw.
Again, God bless them both. I would give anything to talk to them and
have them tell their story. How brave they were to have kept silent all
these years and remain out of the spotlight. I can only imagine how
fearful they were after the events of that day. I hope nothing ever
happened to them and that they were able to live their lives in peace.
Although, what an amazing story theirs is, as it is very likely they saw
the shooter(s) behind the picket fence either before or immediately after
the shooting, and for fear for their lives they have never come
forward.
beaviselectron
3 years ago
Also, read Marilyn Sitzman's testimony to the Warren Commission. She was
standing on the concrete pergola with Zapruder, keeping him steady because
suffered from vertigo. She speaks of seeing the Negro couple behind the
"Black Dog Man" firing position. In April 1997 I went to Dealey Plaza and
had myself photographed in a high-contrast outfit (white shirt and black
pants) standing behind the wall, and had many photos taken from several
angles. I am 6'4" tall and the wall doesn't even come up to my belt
buckle as it can readily be seen in the photos. NO ONE could or should
use this as a firing position, or expect to escape if doing so. And the
image of the BDM is about how much of a human being of average height you
would see if you were looking at them. Black Dog Man has ZERO
credibility, and this is coming from a WC skeptic. I do NOT believe LHO
did it, or acted alone, but the answer is NOT Black Dog Man. I am a
professional investigator by trade and there is simply NO evidence that
supports this theory. All smoke and no fire.
A modern theory & most likely a solution to the Blackdogman figure in Dealy Plaza
from Jeff Rollins & Robin Unger
1:29
The Venerable Bede
1 year ago (edited)
Without a doubt, two of the most intriguing eyewitnesses to the
assassination, as neither have ever been identified and have maintained
their silence for some 53 years now. God bless them! I know Mike
Brownlow claims to know who they are (Arthur and Evelyn King, who he
claims are brother and sister, not husband and wife). However, Brownlow's
credibility has been questioned repeatedly, and I don't really know what
to make of his statements. But if true, that Evelyn came forward a few
years ago to identify herself and tell Brownlow, a fellow
African-American, what she saw and what they were doing there, then it is
an amazing discovery on Brownlow's part. But again, Brownlow's
credibility is not the best, as he is regarded by many to be a con artist.
On the other hand, if they were actually the young black couple Marilyn
Sitzman said she saw sitting on the bench eating their lunch 15-20 minutes
before the motorcade turned onto Elm St. (and I believe they were, as all
the evidence points to this fact), then this makes for a much more
interesting story in my view, as they have yet to come forward and remain
unidentified to this day. I have no reason to doubt why they haven't come
forward to be identified. To me it makes perfect sense: they feared for
their lives. And who can blame them?
There is no doubt in my mind that this tall, young black man in a light
colored (beige?) jacket and dark trousers captured in the Darnell film
standing with the young black woman holding the baby behind the concrete
wall just minutes after the assassination is the same young, tall black
man that was standing on the steps next to Emmett Hudson and the other
(white) man in the red shirt whose name was F. Lee Mudd. Secret Service
agent Paul Landis identified this young man standing next to Hudson as "a
Negro male in light green slacks and a beige colored shirt." Landis saw
him turn and run up the stairs when the shots were fired. This young
black man's reaction to the shot that struck Kennedy in the head was to
turn immediately and run up the steps. His reaction is consistent with
someone whose concern was, evidently, for the loved ones he left sitting
on the bench at the top of the stairs behind him, which was probably his
young wife and child, if not his sister. The child appears to be about 6
months old. You can also see the lunch bag that was left on the bench
where they were apparently eating their lunch, as Sitzman said they were,
before the president's motorcade arrived.
The only logical deduction is that this young black man simply walked down
the steps a few minutes prior to the president's car turning onto Elm St.
in order to get a better view of the president. Hudson only mentioned the
man sitting next to him (the young black man) on the steps who he struck
up a conversation with, stating the young man was, he estimated, about in
his late twenties. He did not mention the other man, F. Lee Mudd, who was
the man in the red shirt standing a few steps down in front of them. The
reason is obvious. He did not know him and did not speak to him. He only
spoke to the young black man for a few minutes before the president's car
turned onto Elm St. Hudson said at that point they both stood (they were
sitting prior to that), and Hudson's attention was focused entirely on the
motorcade, not the young black man standing next to him who he had just
talked to. When the shots were fired, this young black man immediately
turned and ran up the steps, back in the direction of where the bench was
located, in fear that his young wife (or sister) and child were in harm's
way. They likely remained atop the knoll for 10-15 minutes, blending in
with the crowd. You can see in the Darnell film how the Dallas police
were moving people out of that area. They were clearing the area of
spectators and witnesses. The young black woman is later seen in another
photo (probably 15-20 minutes after the shooting) standing in front of the
entrance to the TSBD where a station had been set up by police to take
testimony from witnesses. She was standing in line holding this same
baby, evidently waiting to tell police what she saw. This young black
couple (whether husband and wife, or brother and sister) evidently walked
away after that and never came forward (understandably) to tell their
story and what they saw.
Again, God bless them both. I would give anything to talk to them and
have them tell their story. How brave they were to have kept silent all
these years and remain out of the spotlight. I can only imagine how
fearful they were after the events of that day. I hope nothing ever
happened to them and that they were able to live their lives in peace.
Although, what an amazing story theirs is, as it is very likely they saw
the shooter(s) behind the picket fence either before or immediately after
the shooting, and for fear for their lives they have never come
forward.
beaviselectron
3 years ago
Also, read Marilyn Sitzman's testimony to the Warren Commission. She was
standing on the concrete pergola with Zapruder, keeping him steady because
suffered from vertigo. She speaks of seeing the Negro couple behind the
"Black Dog Man" firing position. In April 1997 I went to Dealey Plaza and
had myself photographed in a high-contrast outfit (white shirt and black
pants) standing behind the wall, and had many photos taken from several
angles. I am 6'4" tall and the wall doesn't even come up to my belt
buckle as it can readily be seen in the photos. NO ONE could or should
use this as a firing position, or expect to escape if doing so. And the
image of the BDM is about how much of a human being of average height you
would see if you were looking at them. Black Dog Man has ZERO
credibility, and this is coming from a WC skeptic. I do NOT believe LHO
did it, or acted alone, but the answer is NOT Black Dog Man. I am a
professional investigator by trade and there is simply NO evidence that
supports this theory. All smoke and no fire.