Discussion:
Questionable Content: helping out
(too old to reply)
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-02 17:41:08 UTC
Permalink
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472

Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?

Lynn
Dorothy J Heydt
2017-05-02 19:40:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
--
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-03 06:20:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.

Lynn
Dorothy J Heydt
2017-05-03 12:47:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.

After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.

But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
--
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
--
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
Carl Fink
2017-05-03 13:29:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
We Patreon supporters already know! Muhahaha!

OK, very slightly early access isn't actually worthy of the Evil Villain
Laugh, but there you go.
--
Carl Fink ***@nitpicking.com

Read my blog at blog.nitpicking.com. Reviews! Observations!
Stupid mistakes you can correct!
Dorothy J Heydt
2017-05-03 17:02:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Carl Fink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
We Patreon supporters already know! Muhahaha!
OK, very slightly early access isn't actually worthy of the Evil Villain
Laugh, but there you go.
I can wait. Gads, I'd better, because I do not have Patreon
money for any of the people I would support if I did have.
--
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
Jay E. Morris
2017-05-03 21:56:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Carl Fink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
We Patreon supporters already know! Muhahaha!
OK, very slightly early access isn't actually worthy of the Evil Villain
Laugh, but there you go.
I can wait. Gads, I'd better, because I do not have Patreon
money for any of the people I would support if I did have.
Me neither, but when I win the lottery! PATREON FOR EVERYONE!
Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
2017-05-04 00:47:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jay E. Morris
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Carl Fink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
We Patreon supporters already know! Muhahaha!
OK, very slightly early access isn't actually worthy of the Evil Villain
Laugh, but there you go.
I can wait. Gads, I'd better, because I do not have Patreon
money for any of the people I would support if I did have.
Even if you just do a dollar per Patreon, that can add up quick if you
have a lot of authors on your list.
Post by Jay E. Morris
Me neither, but when I win the lottery! PATREON FOR EVERYONE!
This author approves.
--
Sea Wasp
/^\
;;;
Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog:
http://seawasp.livejournal.com
Jaimie Vandenbergh
2017-05-04 20:53:40 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 3 May 2017 20:47:20 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)"
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Jay E. Morris
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Carl Fink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
We Patreon supporters already know! Muhahaha!
OK, very slightly early access isn't actually worthy of the Evil Villain
Laugh, but there you go.
I can wait. Gads, I'd better, because I do not have Patreon
money for any of the people I would support if I did have.
Even if you just do a dollar per Patreon, that can add up quick if you
have a lot of authors on your list.
My April Patreon bill bumped over $100, so I went through and dropped
the funding down on the few people/teams who were making a decent wage
out of Patreon (by which I mean >£4k/month/person). They've succeeded!
Which is excellent.

And I found two new ones from "people who funded these, funded those..."
while reviewing. I do love Patreon.
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Jay E. Morris
Me neither, but when I win the lottery! PATREON FOR EVERYONE!
This author approves.
I mostly contribute to webcomics authors, with a smattering of
podcasters and prose writers - they all have a bad time financially and
I'm totally in favour of them continuing to do their thing.

Cheers - Jaimie
--
If you think it's simple, then you have misunderstood the problem
-- Bjarne Stroustrup
Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
2017-05-05 00:31:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jaimie Vandenbergh
On Wed, 3 May 2017 20:47:20 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)"
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Carl Fink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
We Patreon supporters already know! Muhahaha!
OK, very slightly early access isn't actually worthy of the Evil Villain
Laugh, but there you go.
I can wait. Gads, I'd better, because I do not have Patreon
money for any of the people I would support if I did have.
Even if you just do a dollar per Patreon, that can add up quick if you
have a lot of authors on your list.
My April Patreon bill bumped over $100, so I went through and dropped
the funding down on the few people/teams who were making a decent wage
out of Patreon (by which I mean >£4k/month/person). They've succeeded!
Which is excellent.
And I found two new ones from "people who funded these, funded those..."
while reviewing. I do love Patreon.
It's now giving me enough money that I am contracting for more
advertising-usable illustrations using that money.

If I ever got to the level you're talking about, it'd change my life,
pretty much.
--
Sea Wasp
/^\
;;;
Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog:
http://seawasp.livejournal.com
Jaimie Vandenbergh
2017-05-05 00:52:56 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 4 May 2017 20:31:52 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)"
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Jaimie Vandenbergh
On Wed, 3 May 2017 20:47:20 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)"
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Carl Fink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
We Patreon supporters already know! Muhahaha!
OK, very slightly early access isn't actually worthy of the Evil Villain
Laugh, but there you go.
I can wait. Gads, I'd better, because I do not have Patreon
money for any of the people I would support if I did have.
Even if you just do a dollar per Patreon, that can add up quick if you
have a lot of authors on your list.
My April Patreon bill bumped over $100, so I went through and dropped
the funding down on the few people/teams who were making a decent wage
out of Patreon (by which I mean >£4k/month/person). They've succeeded!
Which is excellent.
And I found two new ones from "people who funded these, funded those..."
while reviewing. I do love Patreon.
It's now giving me enough money that I am contracting for more
advertising-usable illustrations using that money.
Hurrah!
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
If I ever got to the level you're talking about, it'd change my life,
pretty much.
Aaaand that's a couple more on the list, since I didn't realise LWE had
a patreon either.

Yeah, the ones who've made it are now full-time whatever-they-wanted. So
good. Here's hoping for you!

Cheers - Jaimie
--
"In my opinion, we don't devote nearly enough scientific research
to finding a cure for jerks." -- Calvin/Bill Watterson
Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
2017-05-05 01:29:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jaimie Vandenbergh
On Thu, 4 May 2017 20:31:52 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)"
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Jaimie Vandenbergh
On Wed, 3 May 2017 20:47:20 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)"
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Carl Fink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
We Patreon supporters already know! Muhahaha!
OK, very slightly early access isn't actually worthy of the Evil Villain
Laugh, but there you go.
I can wait. Gads, I'd better, because I do not have Patreon
money for any of the people I would support if I did have.
Even if you just do a dollar per Patreon, that can add up quick if you
have a lot of authors on your list.
My April Patreon bill bumped over $100, so I went through and dropped
the funding down on the few people/teams who were making a decent wage
out of Patreon (by which I mean >£4k/month/person). They've succeeded!
Which is excellent.
And I found two new ones from "people who funded these, funded those..."
while reviewing. I do love Patreon.
It's now giving me enough money that I am contracting for more
advertising-usable illustrations using that money.
Hurrah!
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
If I ever got to the level you're talking about, it'd change my life,
pretty much.
Aaaand that's a couple more on the list, since I didn't realise LWE had
a patreon either.
Awesome! Thank you so much!
Post by Jaimie Vandenbergh
Yeah, the ones who've made it are now full-time whatever-they-wanted. So
good. Here's hoping for you!
Well, you've done your part! :) Hope you enjoy the Patreon content!
Post by Jaimie Vandenbergh
Cheers - Jaimie
--
Sea Wasp
/^\
;;;
Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog:
http://seawasp.livejournal.com
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-05 17:37:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Jaimie Vandenbergh
On Wed, 3 May 2017 20:47:20 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)"
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Carl Fink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
We Patreon supporters already know! Muhahaha!
OK, very slightly early access isn't actually worthy of the Evil Villain
Laugh, but there you go.
I can wait. Gads, I'd better, because I do not have Patreon
money for any of the people I would support if I did have.
Even if you just do a dollar per Patreon, that can add up quick if you
have a lot of authors on your list.
My April Patreon bill bumped over $100, so I went through and dropped
the funding down on the few people/teams who were making a decent wage
out of Patreon (by which I mean >£4k/month/person). They've succeeded!
Which is excellent.
And I found two new ones from "people who funded these, funded those..."
while reviewing. I do love Patreon.
It's now giving me enough money that I am contracting for more
advertising-usable illustrations using that money.
If I ever got to the level you're talking about, it'd change my
life, pretty much.
Pardon my lack of understanding, but what is "advertising-usable
illustrations using" ?

And good to hear that things are doing well. I love hearing that kind
of stuff.

Thanks,
Lynn
David Johnston
2017-05-05 17:58:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Jaimie Vandenbergh
On Wed, 3 May 2017 20:47:20 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)"
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Carl Fink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
We Patreon supporters already know! Muhahaha!
OK, very slightly early access isn't actually worthy of the Evil Villain
Laugh, but there you go.
I can wait. Gads, I'd better, because I do not have Patreon
money for any of the people I would support if I did have.
Even if you just do a dollar per Patreon, that can add up quick if you
have a lot of authors on your list.
My April Patreon bill bumped over $100, so I went through and dropped
the funding down on the few people/teams who were making a decent wage
out of Patreon (by which I mean >£4k/month/person). They've succeeded!
Which is excellent.
And I found two new ones from "people who funded these, funded those..."
while reviewing. I do love Patreon.
It's now giving me enough money that I am contracting for more
advertising-usable illustrations using that money.
If I ever got to the level you're talking about, it'd change my
life, pretty much.
Pardon my lack of understanding, but what is "advertising-usable
illustrations using" ?
There should be a comma between "illustrations" and "money".
Post by Lynn McGuire
And good to hear that things are doing well. I love hearing that kind
of stuff.
Thanks,
Lynn
Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
2017-05-06 02:50:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Jaimie Vandenbergh
On Wed, 3 May 2017 20:47:20 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)"
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Carl Fink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
We Patreon supporters already know! Muhahaha!
OK, very slightly early access isn't actually worthy of the Evil Villain
Laugh, but there you go.
I can wait. Gads, I'd better, because I do not have Patreon
money for any of the people I would support if I did have.
Even if you just do a dollar per Patreon, that can add up quick if you
have a lot of authors on your list.
My April Patreon bill bumped over $100, so I went through and dropped
the funding down on the few people/teams who were making a decent wage
out of Patreon (by which I mean >£4k/month/person). They've succeeded!
Which is excellent.
And I found two new ones from "people who funded these, funded those..."
while reviewing. I do love Patreon.
It's now giving me enough money that I am contracting for more
advertising-usable illustrations using that money.
If I ever got to the level you're talking about, it'd change my
life, pretty much.
Pardon my lack of understanding, but what is "advertising-usable
illustrations using" ?
There should be a comma between "illustrations" and "money".
Not the way I'd be saying it. That would be "... contracting for more
advertising-usable illustrations[pause] using that money" and I would be
saying it without the pause.
--
Sea Wasp
/^\
;;;
Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog:
http://seawasp.dreamwidth.org
David Johnston
2017-05-06 05:41:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by David Johnston
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Jaimie Vandenbergh
On Wed, 3 May 2017 20:47:20 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)"
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Carl Fink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
We Patreon supporters already know! Muhahaha!
OK, very slightly early access isn't actually worthy of the Evil Villain
Laugh, but there you go.
I can wait. Gads, I'd better, because I do not have Patreon
money for any of the people I would support if I did have.
Even if you just do a dollar per Patreon, that can add up quick if you
have a lot of authors on your list.
My April Patreon bill bumped over $100, so I went through and dropped
the funding down on the few people/teams who were making a decent wage
out of Patreon (by which I mean >£4k/month/person). They've succeeded!
Which is excellent.
And I found two new ones from "people who funded these, funded those..."
while reviewing. I do love Patreon.
It's now giving me enough money that I am contracting for more
advertising-usable illustrations using that money.
If I ever got to the level you're talking about, it'd change my
life, pretty much.
Pardon my lack of understanding, but what is "advertising-usable
illustrations using" ?
There should be a comma between "illustrations" and "money".
Not the way I'd be saying it. That would be "... contracting for
more advertising-usable illustrations[pause] using that money" and I
would be saying it without the pause.
And yet it would not in fact be the illustrations using the money.
Jaimie Vandenbergh
2017-05-06 09:37:13 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 5 May 2017 23:41:44 -0600, David Johnston
Post by David Johnston
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by David Johnston
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Jaimie Vandenbergh
I do love Patreon.
It's now giving me enough money that I am contracting for more
advertising-usable illustrations using that money.
If I ever got to the level you're talking about, it'd change my
life, pretty much.
Pardon my lack of understanding, but what is "advertising-usable
illustrations using" ?
There should be a comma between "illustrations" and "money".
Not the way I'd be saying it. That would be "... contracting for
more advertising-usable illustrations[pause] using that money" and I
would be saying it without the pause.
And yet it would not in fact be the illustrations using the money.
The grouping routine in your English parser has failed. Try this:

"I am contracting for more (advertising-usable illustrations) using that
money."

Cheers - Jaimie
--
"The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted" -- Bertrand Russell
Greg Goss
2017-05-06 13:58:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
It's now giving me enough money that I am contracting for more
advertising-usable illustrations using that money.
And yet it would not in fact be the illustrations using the money.
With or without a comma, "using" gets attached to "contracting".
FUTURE illustrations are a result of using the money.

I fail to see the dispute here.
--
We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
Joe Pfeiffer
2017-05-05 19:34:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
It's now giving me enough money that I am contracting for more
advertising-usable illustrations using that money.
If I ever got to the level you're talking about, it'd change my
life, pretty much.
Pardon my lack of understanding, but what is "advertising-usable
illustrations using" ?
Maybe "I am using that money to contract for more advertising-useable
illustrations".
Post by Lynn McGuire
And good to hear that things are doing well. I love hearing that kind
of stuff.
Thanks,
Lynn
Robert Carnegie
2017-05-05 22:40:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Pfeiffer
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
It's now giving me enough money that I am contracting for more
advertising-usable illustrations using that money.
If I ever got to the level you're talking about, it'd change my
life, pretty much.
Pardon my lack of understanding, but what is "advertising-usable
illustrations using" ?
Maybe "I am using that money to contract for more advertising-useable
illustrations".
And/or "more illustrations that I can use in the
advertising".

Although, I assume the book is already pretty
so what else do you need - well, we'll see the
advertising. Maybe a queue of all the
L. Frank Baum Oz characters waiting for the
book store to open.

(I suppose you could announce a fake Judy Garland
personal appearance and then photograph cosplayers,
but would that strictly be cheaper - or legal -
and would you get the Munchkins?)
Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
2017-05-06 02:52:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert Carnegie
Post by Joe Pfeiffer
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
It's now giving me enough money that I am contracting for more
advertising-usable illustrations using that money.
If I ever got to the level you're talking about, it'd change my
life, pretty much.
Pardon my lack of understanding, but what is "advertising-usable
illustrations using" ?
Maybe "I am using that money to contract for more advertising-useable
illustrations".
And/or "more illustrations that I can use in the
advertising".
Although, I assume the book is already pretty
so what else do you need - well, we'll see the
advertising. Maybe a queue of all the
L. Frank Baum Oz characters waiting for the
book store to open.
Actually, I'm not advertising Polychrome at the moment, the stuff I'm
paying for is for the Arenaverse and for the forthcoming Princess Holy Aura.
--
Sea Wasp
/^\
;;;
Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog:
http://seawasp.dreamwidth.org
Robert Carnegie
2017-05-06 08:46:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Robert Carnegie
Post by Joe Pfeiffer
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
It's now giving me enough money that I am contracting for more
advertising-usable illustrations using that money.
If I ever got to the level you're talking about, it'd change my
life, pretty much.
Pardon my lack of understanding, but what is "advertising-usable
illustrations using" ?
Maybe "I am using that money to contract for more advertising-useable
illustrations".
And/or "more illustrations that I can use in the
advertising".
Although, I assume the book is already pretty
so what else do you need - well, we'll see the
advertising. Maybe a queue of all the
L. Frank Baum Oz characters waiting for the
book store to open.
Actually, I'm not advertising Polychrome at the moment, the stuff I'm
paying for is for the Arenaverse and for the forthcoming Princess Holy Aura.
But I'm presuming the Oz characters are fans of
all your work.[*] But, do they get comps?

[*] "are all your fans" was my first draft.
Open to further misinterpretation. ;-)
Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
2017-05-06 02:48:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Jaimie Vandenbergh
On Wed, 3 May 2017 20:47:20 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)"
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Carl Fink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
We Patreon supporters already know! Muhahaha!
OK, very slightly early access isn't actually worthy of the Evil Villain
Laugh, but there you go.
I can wait. Gads, I'd better, because I do not have Patreon
money for any of the people I would support if I did have.
Even if you just do a dollar per Patreon, that can add up quick if you
have a lot of authors on your list.
My April Patreon bill bumped over $100, so I went through and dropped
the funding down on the few people/teams who were making a decent wage
out of Patreon (by which I mean >£4k/month/person). They've succeeded!
Which is excellent.
And I found two new ones from "people who funded these, funded those..."
while reviewing. I do love Patreon.
It's now giving me enough money that I am contracting for more
advertising-usable illustrations using that money.
If I ever got to the level you're talking about, it'd change my
life, pretty much.
Pardon my lack of understanding, but what is "advertising-usable
illustrations using" ?
You left out "that money". [It's now giving me enough money][that I am
now contracting for] [more advertising-usable illustrations][using that
money].
--
Sea Wasp
/^\
;;;
Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog:
http://seawasp.dreamwidth.org
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-03 17:42:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?

Lynn
Dorothy J Heydt
2017-05-03 18:44:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
Faye. She said so, when she agreed to help Bubbles get out of
her armour. Bubbles said it's been a while, so getting it off
might be difficult, and Faye said, "no problem, I keep a pry bar
under my bed."

Go back a couple pages, you'll see it.
--
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-03 19:52:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
Faye. She said so, when she agreed to help Bubbles get out of
her armour. Bubbles said it's been a while, so getting it off
might be difficult, and Faye said, "no problem, I keep a pry bar
under my bed."
Go back a couple pages, you'll see it.
I saw it, I was just questioning the practice. I take it back now, Faye
is a little out there.

Lynn
Dorothy J Heydt
2017-05-03 20:55:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
Faye. She said so, when she agreed to help Bubbles get out of
her armour. Bubbles said it's been a while, so getting it off
might be difficult, and Faye said, "no problem, I keep a pry bar
under my bed."
Go back a couple pages, you'll see it.
I saw it, I was just questioning the practice. I take it back now, Faye
is a little out there.
Remember, she's had some serious trouble in her life and is a
recovering alcoholic.
--
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
David Mitchell
2017-05-04 04:18:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.

This is because you are all savages. ;-)
Carl Fink
2017-05-04 13:12:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Mitchell
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
Don't forget, Faye's ex-boss and Marten's ex-girlfriend keeps a sword and
mace under the counter at her coffee shop.

Which is sometimes attacked by martial-arts monks. (OK, the attack didn't
actually happen there, but you know what I mean.)

It's a weird universe.
--
Carl Fink ***@nitpicking.com

Read my blog at blog.nitpicking.com. Reviews! Observations!
Stupid mistakes you can correct!
Dorothy J Heydt
2017-05-04 13:25:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
Or because other people are.
--
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
David Mitchell
2017-05-04 14:42:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
Or because other people are.
This is a serious question - just difficult to ask because it tends to
be thought of an insult - but: do most Americans realise how.. different
their culture is from European and Canadian ones?

You have a massive army, more people in prison than most other western
countries, and you kill each other with great abandon.

You *do* know how odd all this is, don't you?
James Nicoll
2017-05-04 15:01:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Mitchell
This is a serious question - just difficult to ask because it tends to
be thought of an insult - but: do most Americans realise how.. different
their culture is from European and Canadian ones?
You have a massive army, more people in prison than most other western
countries, and you kill each other with great abandon.
You *do* know how odd all this is, don't you?
ObSF: One of the details I noticed in Smith's libertarian utopias is
everyone is heavily armed and live in fortresses, lest the ravening
hordes of criminals descend on them. And this fear seems to be
realistic in Smith's setting. It undermined the whole utopian
element.
--
My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
My Livejournal at http://www.livejournal.com/users/james_nicoll
My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll
David Johnston
2017-05-04 15:11:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Nicoll
Post by David Mitchell
This is a serious question - just difficult to ask because it tends to
be thought of an insult - but: do most Americans realise how.. different
their culture is from European and Canadian ones?
You have a massive army, more people in prison than most other western
countries, and you kill each other with great abandon.
You *do* know how odd all this is, don't you?
ObSF: One of the details I noticed in Smith's libertarian utopias is
everyone is heavily armed and live in fortresses, lest the ravening
hordes of criminals descend on them. And this fear seems to be
realistic in Smith's setting. It undermined the whole utopian
element.
That's kind of cool. I like "utopias" that have an admitted downside.
l***@dimnakorr.com
2017-05-04 15:23:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
That's kind of cool. I like "utopias" that have an admitted downside.
"Subtopia"?
--
Leif Roar Moldskred
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-04 17:32:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
Post by James Nicoll
Post by David Mitchell
This is a serious question - just difficult to ask because it tends to
be thought of an insult - but: do most Americans realise how.. different
their culture is from European and Canadian ones?
You have a massive army, more people in prison than most other western
countries, and you kill each other with great abandon.
You *do* know how odd all this is, don't you?
ObSF: One of the details I noticed in Smith's libertarian utopias is
everyone is heavily armed and live in fortresses, lest the ravening
hordes of criminals descend on them. And this fear seems to be
realistic in Smith's setting. It undermined the whole utopian
element.
That's kind of cool. I like "utopias" that have an admitted downside.
Utopias always slide into dystopias. Always.

Lynn
James Nicoll
2017-05-04 18:46:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by David Johnston
Post by James Nicoll
Post by David Mitchell
This is a serious question - just difficult to ask because it tends to
be thought of an insult - but: do most Americans realise how.. different
their culture is from European and Canadian ones?
You have a massive army, more people in prison than most other western
countries, and you kill each other with great abandon.
You *do* know how odd all this is, don't you?
ObSF: One of the details I noticed in Smith's libertarian utopias is
everyone is heavily armed and live in fortresses, lest the ravening
hordes of criminals descend on them. And this fear seems to be
realistic in Smith's setting. It undermined the whole utopian
element.
That's kind of cool. I like "utopias" that have an admitted downside.
Utopias always slide into dystopias. Always.
In this case, the author seems unaware that his setting is in any way
dystopian, except for when those darned Hamiltonians show up.
--
My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
My Livejournal at http://www.livejournal.com/users/james_nicoll
My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll
Peter Trei
2017-05-04 15:42:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
Or because other people are.
This is a serious question - just difficult to ask because it tends to
be thought of an insult - but: do most Americans realise how.. different
their culture is from European and Canadian ones?
You have a massive army, more people in prison than most other western
countries, and you kill each other with great abandon.
You *do* know how odd all this is, don't you?
I think you need check your assumptions as to what is reasonable.

European countries have been able to get away with underspending on military
only *because* the US has been protecting them - The only a handful of NATO
countries meet their promises on spending, expecting the US to protect them
at it's expense, was a major issue during the election.

As for homicide rate, the US rate is currently near a 100-year low. Its simply
not as dangerous here as you think. The rate is about the same as Eastern
Europe, and much lower than Russia. Most Americans do not spend their days in
fear of being murdered - dying in a traffic accident is much more likely.

The numbers are also skewed by different reporting standards. The US reports as
homicide pretty any violent, apparently intentional killing. The UK, OTOH,
reports only cases where someone has been convicted of murder. Unsolved cases
aren't included.

I won't argue with the incarceration figure; I'm with you on that one.

pt
David Mitchell
2017-05-04 17:17:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
Or because other people are.
This is a serious question - just difficult to ask because it tends to
be thought of an insult - but: do most Americans realise how.. different
their culture is from European and Canadian ones?
You have a massive army, more people in prison than most other western
countries, and you kill each other with great abandon.
You *do* know how odd all this is, don't you?
I think you need check your assumptions as to what is reasonable.
European countries have been able to get away with underspending on military
only *because* the US has been protecting them - The only a handful of NATO
countries meet their promises on spending, expecting the US to protect them
at it's expense, was a major issue during the election.
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a hefty
margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it hasn't been
invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Post by Peter Trei
As for homicide rate, the US rate is currently near a 100-year low. Its simply
not as dangerous here as you think. The rate is about the same as Eastern
Europe, and much lower than Russia. Most Americans do not spend their days in
fear of being murdered - dying in a traffic accident is much more likely.
And yet you're way above most western nations, (from a brief look at the
Wikipedia entry, only Russia, Ukraine and Turkey are worse).
IIRC you also have a school or workplace shooting every 21 days, on
average - it's so common you drill for it, and most are no longer reported.

C'mon, don't you think that's odd? I can only find three for the UK in
30 years. Yes, I know we don't usually have access to guns; but a
machete is about as dangerous to unarmed civilians as a gun, and they're
easy to get.
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-04 17:36:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
Or because other people are.
This is a serious question - just difficult to ask because it tends to
be thought of an insult - but: do most Americans realise how.. different
their culture is from European and Canadian ones?
You have a massive army, more people in prison than most other western
countries, and you kill each other with great abandon.
You *do* know how odd all this is, don't you?
I think you need check your assumptions as to what is reasonable.
European countries have been able to get away with underspending on military
only *because* the US has been protecting them - The only a handful of NATO
countries meet their promises on spending, expecting the US to protect them
at it's expense, was a major issue during the election.
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a hefty
margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it hasn't been
invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Post by Peter Trei
As for homicide rate, the US rate is currently near a 100-year low. Its simply
not as dangerous here as you think. The rate is about the same as Eastern
Europe, and much lower than Russia. Most Americans do not spend their days in
fear of being murdered - dying in a traffic accident is much more likely.
And yet you're way above most western nations, (from a brief look at the
Wikipedia entry, only Russia, Ukraine and Turkey are worse).
IIRC you also have a school or workplace shooting every 21 days, on
average - it's so common you drill for it, and most are no longer reported.
C'mon, don't you think that's odd? I can only find three for the UK in
30 years. Yes, I know we don't usually have access to guns; but a
machete is about as dangerous to unarmed civilians as a gun, and they're
easy to get.
How about the invasions of Texas in the 1840s by Mexico ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican%E2%80%93American_War

Lynn
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-04 17:38:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
Or because other people are.
This is a serious question - just difficult to ask because it tends to
be thought of an insult - but: do most Americans realise how.. different
their culture is from European and Canadian ones?
You have a massive army, more people in prison than most other western
countries, and you kill each other with great abandon.
You *do* know how odd all this is, don't you?
I think you need check your assumptions as to what is reasonable.
European countries have been able to get away with underspending on military
only *because* the US has been protecting them - The only a handful of NATO
countries meet their promises on spending, expecting the US to protect them
at it's expense, was a major issue during the election.
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a hefty
margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it hasn't been
invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Post by Peter Trei
As for homicide rate, the US rate is currently near a 100-year low. Its simply
not as dangerous here as you think. The rate is about the same as Eastern
Europe, and much lower than Russia. Most Americans do not spend their days in
fear of being murdered - dying in a traffic accident is much more likely.
And yet you're way above most western nations, (from a brief look at the
Wikipedia entry, only Russia, Ukraine and Turkey are worse).
IIRC you also have a school or workplace shooting every 21 days, on
average - it's so common you drill for it, and most are no longer reported.
C'mon, don't you think that's odd? I can only find three for the UK in
30 years. Yes, I know we don't usually have access to guns; but a
machete is about as dangerous to unarmed civilians as a gun, and they're
easy to get.
Of course, there is the bombing of Hawaii in 1941. And there were
several German u-boats sunk by the USA Coast Gaurd during WWII. One was
in the Mississippi river north of New Orleans.

Lynn
David Mitchell
2017-05-04 17:56:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
Or because other people are.
This is a serious question - just difficult to ask because it tends to
be thought of an insult - but: do most Americans realise how.. different
their culture is from European and Canadian ones?
You have a massive army, more people in prison than most other western
countries, and you kill each other with great abandon.
You *do* know how odd all this is, don't you?
I think you need check your assumptions as to what is reasonable.
European countries have been able to get away with underspending on military
only *because* the US has been protecting them - The only a handful of NATO
countries meet their promises on spending, expecting the US to protect them
at it's expense, was a major issue during the election.
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a hefty
margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it hasn't been
invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Post by Peter Trei
As for homicide rate, the US rate is currently near a 100-year low. Its simply
not as dangerous here as you think. The rate is about the same as Eastern
Europe, and much lower than Russia. Most Americans do not spend their days in
fear of being murdered - dying in a traffic accident is much more likely.
And yet you're way above most western nations, (from a brief look at
the Wikipedia entry, only Russia, Ukraine and Turkey are worse).
IIRC you also have a school or workplace shooting every 21 days, on
average - it's so common you drill for it, and most are no longer reported.
C'mon, don't you think that's odd? I can only find three for the UK in
30 years. Yes, I know we don't usually have access to guns; but a
machete is about as dangerous to unarmed civilians as a gun, and
they're easy to get.
Of course, there is the bombing of Hawaii in 1941. And there were
several German u-boats sunk by the USA Coast Gaurd during WWII. One was
in the Mississippi river north of New Orleans.
None of those were invasions, nor precursors to them, AFAIK.
And "They were then attacked by Mexican forces, who killed 12 U.S.
soldiers and took 52 as prisoners."

It's not really Poland, is it?
Peter Trei
2017-05-04 19:45:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her
chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
Or because other people are.
This is a serious question - just difficult to ask because it tends to
be thought of an insult - but: do most Americans realise how.. different
their culture is from European and Canadian ones?
You have a massive army, more people in prison than most other western
countries, and you kill each other with great abandon.
You *do* know how odd all this is, don't you?
I think you need check your assumptions as to what is reasonable.
European countries have been able to get away with underspending on military
only *because* the US has been protecting them - The only a handful of NATO
countries meet their promises on spending, expecting the US to protect them
at it's expense, was a major issue during the election.
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a hefty
margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it hasn't been
invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Post by Peter Trei
As for homicide rate, the US rate is currently near a 100-year low. Its simply
not as dangerous here as you think. The rate is about the same as Eastern
Europe, and much lower than Russia. Most Americans do not spend their days in
fear of being murdered - dying in a traffic accident is much more likely.
And yet you're way above most western nations, (from a brief look at
the Wikipedia entry, only Russia, Ukraine and Turkey are worse).
IIRC you also have a school or workplace shooting every 21 days, on
average - it's so common you drill for it, and most are no longer reported.
C'mon, don't you think that's odd? I can only find three for the UK in
30 years. Yes, I know we don't usually have access to guns; but a
machete is about as dangerous to unarmed civilians as a gun, and
they're easy to get.
Of course, there is the bombing of Hawaii in 1941. And there were
several German u-boats sunk by the USA Coast Gaurd during WWII. One was
in the Mississippi river north of New Orleans.
None of those were invasions, nor precursors to them, AFAIK.
And "They were then attacked by Mexican forces, who killed 12 U.S.
soldiers and took 52 as prisoners."
It's not really Poland, is it?
The Japanese invaded and held three Aleutian islands for over a year.

pt
David Mitchell
2017-05-05 04:24:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her
chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
Or because other people are.
This is a serious question - just difficult to ask because it tends to
be thought of an insult - but: do most Americans realise how.. different
their culture is from European and Canadian ones?
You have a massive army, more people in prison than most other western
countries, and you kill each other with great abandon.
You *do* know how odd all this is, don't you?
I think you need check your assumptions as to what is reasonable.
European countries have been able to get away with underspending on military
only *because* the US has been protecting them - The only a handful of NATO
countries meet their promises on spending, expecting the US to protect them
at it's expense, was a major issue during the election.
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a hefty
margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it hasn't been
invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Post by Peter Trei
As for homicide rate, the US rate is currently near a 100-year low. Its simply
not as dangerous here as you think. The rate is about the same as Eastern
Europe, and much lower than Russia. Most Americans do not spend their days in
fear of being murdered - dying in a traffic accident is much more likely.
And yet you're way above most western nations, (from a brief look at
the Wikipedia entry, only Russia, Ukraine and Turkey are worse).
IIRC you also have a school or workplace shooting every 21 days, on
average - it's so common you drill for it, and most are no longer reported.
C'mon, don't you think that's odd? I can only find three for the UK in
30 years. Yes, I know we don't usually have access to guns; but a
machete is about as dangerous to unarmed civilians as a gun, and
they're easy to get.
Of course, there is the bombing of Hawaii in 1941. And there were
several German u-boats sunk by the USA Coast Gaurd during WWII. One was
in the Mississippi river north of New Orleans.
None of those were invasions, nor precursors to them, AFAIK.
And "They were then attacked by Mexican forces, who killed 12 U.S.
soldiers and took 52 as prisoners."
It's not really Poland, is it?
The Japanese invaded and held three Aleutian islands for over a year.
Again, not really Poland.
Not really justification for "the highest total military budget in the
world by a hefty margin".

Or do you think that most Americans think that it is?
That's really the kind of question I'm looking for the answer to.
Jay E. Morris
2017-05-04 20:01:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Peter Trei
I think you need check your assumptions as to what is reasonable.
European countries have been able to get away with underspending on military
only *because* the US has been protecting them - The only a handful of NATO
countries meet their promises on spending, expecting the US to protect them
at it's expense, was a major issue during the election.
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a hefty
margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it hasn't been
invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Per capita, we're fourth and there's not all that much difference
between 3-8.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditure_per_capita
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
2017-05-04 20:11:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Mitchell
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a
hefty margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it
hasn't been invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Or perhaps that's the *reason* we haven't been invaded since 1812.
--
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-04 20:36:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by David Mitchell
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a
hefty margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it
hasn't been invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Or perhaps that's the *reason* we haven't been invaded since 1812.
The most expensive military is the second best military.

Lynn
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
2017-05-04 21:22:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by David Mitchell
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a
hefty margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it
hasn't been invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Or perhaps that's the *reason* we haven't been invaded since 1812.
The most expensive military is the second best military.
Is that a vague word-bite piece of meaningless wisdom about it being
more expensive to lose than to win, or are you dissing our military?
I really can't tell.
--
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-04 22:59:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by David Mitchell
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a
hefty margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it
hasn't been invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Or perhaps that's the *reason* we haven't been invaded since 1812.
The most expensive military is the second best military.
Is that a vague word-bite piece of meaningless wisdom about it being
more expensive to lose than to win, or are you dissing our military?
I really can't tell.
It is an old saying that the losing army is more expensive than the
winning army. In the losing case, you lost all your stuff (and you !).
In the winning case, you just lost your shirt but then you gained all of
the other guy's stuff. I don't know about the stalemate case (see Koreas).

Lynn
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
2017-05-04 23:18:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by David Mitchell
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by
a hefty margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given
that it hasn't been invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count
;-)
Or perhaps that's the *reason* we haven't been invaded since 1812.
The most expensive military is the second best military.
Is that a vague word-bite piece of meaningless wisdom about it
being more expensive to lose than to win, or are you dissing
our military? I really can't tell.
It is an old saying that the losing army is more expensive than
the winning army.
I was leaning that way (and I agree), but it was hard to tell.
--
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
l***@dimnakorr.com
2017-05-05 04:49:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
It is an old saying that the losing army is more expensive than the
winning army. In the losing case, you lost all your stuff (and you !).
In the winning case, you just lost your shirt but then you gained all of
the other guy's stuff. I don't know about the stalemate case (see Koreas).
Of course, the underlying assumption is that the most expensive army will
be the winning army. That might be the way to bet, but we've several examples
from history of that not being the case.
--
Leif Roar Moldskred
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
2017-05-05 16:16:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by l***@dimnakorr.com
Post by Lynn McGuire
It is an old saying that the losing army is more expensive than
the winning army. In the losing case, you lost all your stuff
(and you !). In the winning case, you just lost your shirt but
then you gained all of the other guy's stuff. I don't know
about the stalemate case (see Koreas).
Of course, the underlying assumption is that the most expensive
army will be the winning army. That might be the way to bet, but
we've several examples from history of that not being the case.
There are counterexamples, but that is the way to bet. (And the only
old saying that you can rely on to be literally true 100% of the time
is "old sayings shouldn't be accepted as literal truth 100% of the
time." Which isn't actually an old saying.)
--
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
Gene Wirchenko
2017-05-06 14:10:39 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 05 May 2017 09:16:11 -0700, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by l***@dimnakorr.com
Post by Lynn McGuire
It is an old saying that the losing army is more expensive than
the winning army. In the losing case, you lost all your stuff
(and you !). In the winning case, you just lost your shirt but
then you gained all of the other guy's stuff. I don't know
about the stalemate case (see Koreas).
Of course, the underlying assumption is that the most expensive
army will be the winning army. That might be the way to bet, but
we've several examples from history of that not being the case.
There are counterexamples, but that is the way to bet. (And the only
old saying that you can rely on to be literally true 100% of the time
is "old sayings shouldn't be accepted as literal truth 100% of the
time." Which isn't actually an old saying.)
Give it time. Give it time.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Lynn McGuire
2017-05-05 17:40:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by l***@dimnakorr.com
Post by Lynn McGuire
It is an old saying that the losing army is more expensive than the
winning army. In the losing case, you lost all your stuff (and you !).
In the winning case, you just lost your shirt but then you gained all of
the other guy's stuff. I don't know about the stalemate case (see Koreas).
Of course, the underlying assumption is that the most expensive army will
be the winning army. That might be the way to bet, but we've several examples
from history of that not being the case.
I am fairly sure that the Japanese armed forces of the 1930s were better
than the USAs. That really required the USA to step up and a change in
the way that wars are fought (nuclear bombs).

Lynn
l***@dimnakorr.com
2017-05-05 18:23:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
I am fairly sure that the Japanese armed forces of the 1930s were better
than the USAs.
Wasn't pretty much _everybody's_ armed forces better than the USAs in the
1930s?
--
Leif Roar Moldskred
And let's not even _mention_ the 1920s.
William Hyde
2017-05-05 20:45:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by l***@dimnakorr.com
Post by Lynn McGuire
I am fairly sure that the Japanese armed forces of the 1930s were better
than the USAs.
Wasn't pretty much _everybody's_ armed forces better than the USAs in the
1930s?
Well, not the British. Until, perhaps 1938 or so when a decent number of hurricanes were deployed and the George V battleships finished. Still had awful tanks, though.

William Hyde
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
2017-05-05 18:25:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by l***@dimnakorr.com
Post by Lynn McGuire
It is an old saying that the losing army is more expensive
than the winning army. In the losing case, you lost all your
stuff (and you !). In the winning case, you just lost your
shirt but then you gained all of the other guy's stuff. I
don't know about the stalemate case (see Koreas).
Of course, the underlying assumption is that the most expensive
army will be the winning army. That might be the way to bet,
but we've several examples from history of that not being the
case.
I am fairly sure that the Japanese armed forces of the 1930s
were better than the USAs. That really required the USA to step
up and a change in the way that wars are fought (nuclear bombs).
Which (along with all the other build-up) made it the most expensive
army.
--
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-05 22:47:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by l***@dimnakorr.com
Post by Lynn McGuire
It is an old saying that the losing army is more expensive
than the winning army. In the losing case, you lost all your
stuff (and you !). In the winning case, you just lost your
shirt but then you gained all of the other guy's stuff. I
don't know about the stalemate case (see Koreas).
Of course, the underlying assumption is that the most expensive
army will be the winning army. That might be the way to bet,
but we've several examples from history of that not being the
case.
I am fairly sure that the Japanese armed forces of the 1930s
were better than the USAs. That really required the USA to step
up and a change in the way that wars are fought (nuclear bombs).
Which (along with all the other build-up) made it the most expensive
army.
After WWII started though.

Lynn
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
2017-05-05 22:49:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by l***@dimnakorr.com
Post by Lynn McGuire
It is an old saying that the losing army is more expensive
than the winning army. In the losing case, you lost all
your stuff (and you !). In the winning case, you just lost
your shirt but then you gained all of the other guy's stuff.
I don't know about the stalemate case (see Koreas).
Of course, the underlying assumption is that the most
expensive army will be the winning army. That might be the
way to bet, but we've several examples from history of that
not being the case.
I am fairly sure that the Japanese armed forces of the 1930s
were better than the USAs. That really required the USA to
step up and a change in the way that wars are fought (nuclear
bombs).
Which (along with all the other build-up) made it the most
expensive army.
After WWII started though.
And? We didn't win WWII *before* it started.
--
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
David Johnston
2017-05-06 05:46:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by l***@dimnakorr.com
Post by Lynn McGuire
It is an old saying that the losing army is more expensive
than the winning army. In the losing case, you lost all your
stuff (and you !). In the winning case, you just lost your
shirt but then you gained all of the other guy's stuff. I
don't know about the stalemate case (see Koreas).
Of course, the underlying assumption is that the most expensive
army will be the winning army. That might be the way to bet,
but we've several examples from history of that not being the
case.
I am fairly sure that the Japanese armed forces of the 1930s
were better than the USAs. That really required the USA to step
up and a change in the way that wars are fought (nuclear bombs).
Which (along with all the other build-up) made it the most expensive
army.
After WWII started though.
Lynn
And that's what I find is the path to success in the aforementioned
game. It's more effective to have the facilities and population to be
able to field a large rapidly constructed force after hostilities break
out then to have a military five times the cost of the next most
expensive one in peacetime, unless you intend to start all the wars.
J. Clarke
2017-05-06 11:13:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by l***@dimnakorr.com
Post by Lynn McGuire
It is an old saying that the losing army is more expensive than the
winning army. In the losing case, you lost all your stuff (and you !).
In the winning case, you just lost your shirt but then you gained all of
the other guy's stuff. I don't know about the stalemate case (see Koreas).
Of course, the underlying assumption is that the most expensive army will
be the winning army. That might be the way to bet, but we've several examples
from history of that not being the case.
I am fairly sure that the Japanese armed forces of the 1930s were better
than the USAs. That really required the USA to step up and a change in
the way that wars are fought (nuclear bombs).
Are you being facetious? The Manhattan Project was aimed at Germany but
they ran out of Germans before they had a bomb, so figured may as well use
it to help finish Japan.

But the Pacific war was only in question for about 6 months, at which time
the US took the offensive and never gave it back. The change in war that
came about due to Japan was the transition from battleship to carrier as
the capital ship.

The Pacific war was over with or without the bomb. The US wasn't losing
one day and then the magic bomb happened and the US turned defeat into
victory. Nearly every city in Japan had already been bombed to rubble--
Hiroshima and Nagasaki got it because they were next on the list--there
weren't any higher-priority targets that had anything left worth bombing.
David Johnston
2017-05-04 22:25:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by David Mitchell
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a
hefty margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it
hasn't been invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Or perhaps that's the *reason* we haven't been invaded since 1812.
The most expensive military is the second best military.
I've played a lot of 4x games. That has not been my experience.
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-04 23:00:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by David Mitchell
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a
hefty margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it
hasn't been invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Or perhaps that's the *reason* we haven't been invaded since 1812.
The most expensive military is the second best military.
I've played a lot of 4x games. That has not been my experience.
I have no idea what a 4x game is.

Lynn
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
2017-05-04 23:20:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by David Johnston
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by David Mitchell
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by
a hefty margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given
that it hasn't been invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count
;-)
Or perhaps that's the *reason* we haven't been invaded since 1812.
The most expensive military is the second best military.
I've played a lot of 4x games. That has not been my
experience.
I have no idea what a 4x game is.
eXplore, eXpand, eXploit, and eXterminate. Like Masters of Orion, or
Civilization (not necessarily space based only).

I think he took your comment the wrong way.
--
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
David Johnston
2017-05-05 01:25:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by David Johnston
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by David Mitchell
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a
hefty margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it
hasn't been invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Or perhaps that's the *reason* we haven't been invaded since 1812.
The most expensive military is the second best military.
I've played a lot of 4x games. That has not been my experience.
I have no idea what a 4x game is.
Lynn
4X is a genre of strategy-based video and board games in which players
control an empire and "eXplore, eXpand, eXploit, and eXterminate". The
term was first coined by Alan Emrich in his September 1993 preview of
Master of Orion for Computer Gaming World.[1] Since then, others have
adopted the term to describe games of similar scope and design.
Default User
2017-05-05 17:33:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
4X is a genre of strategy-based video and board games in which players
control an empire and "eXplore, eXpand, eXploit, and eXterminate". The
term was first coined by Alan Emrich in his September 1993 preview of
Master of Orion for Computer Gaming World.[1] Since then, others have
adopted the term to describe games of similar scope and design.
For anyone interested in the genre, there's a great open-source game in development:

http://www.freeorion.org/

It's turn-based, solo against AIs or multi-player over internet. It's available for Windows, Mac, Linux (source only I think). They recently had a new release with a number of new features.


Brian
J. Clarke
2017-05-05 07:40:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by David Johnston
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by David Mitchell
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a
hefty margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it
hasn't been invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Or perhaps that's the *reason* we haven't been invaded since 1812.
The most expensive military is the second best military.
I've played a lot of 4x games. That has not been my experience.
I have no idea what a 4x game is.
When you lose a 4X game your house doesn't get burned, your bank account
doesn't get confiscated, your wife doesn't get raped, and your kids don't
get conscripted, and your dog doesn't get eaten. Judging the value of a
military on the basis of playing games provides you a skewed perspective on
the cost of losing.
David Johnston
2017-05-05 15:09:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Clarke
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by David Johnston
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by David Mitchell
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a
hefty margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it
hasn't been invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Or perhaps that's the *reason* we haven't been invaded since 1812.
The most expensive military is the second best military.
I've played a lot of 4x games. That has not been my experience.
I have no idea what a 4x game is.
When you lose a 4X game your house doesn't get burned, your bank account
doesn't get confiscated, your wife doesn't get raped, and your kids don't
get conscripted, and your dog doesn't get eaten. Judging the value of a
military on the basis of playing games provides you a skewed perspective on
the cost of losing.
Ah. Appeal to emotion. Actually the lesson I learned from those games
is that having the best military _in peacetime_ doesn't reliably convert
into winning the war.
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
2017-05-05 16:19:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Clarke
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by David Johnston
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Post by David Mitchell
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world
by a hefty margin". Don't you think that's excessive,
given that it hasn't been invaded since 1812 (Alaska
doesn't count ;-)
Or perhaps that's the *reason* we haven't been invaded
since 1812.
The most expensive military is the second best military.
I've played a lot of 4x games. That has not been my
experience.
I have no idea what a 4x game is.
When you lose a 4X game your house doesn't get burned, your bank
account doesn't get confiscated, your wife doesn't get raped,
and your kids don't get conscripted, and your dog doesn't get
eaten. Judging the value of a military on the basis of playing
games provides you a skewed perspective on the cost of losing.
If you believe that losing a computer game isn't every bit as
catastrohpic as having your house burned, your bank account
confiscated, your wife raped, your kids consripted and your dog
eaten, you clearly haven't ever met a hardcore gamer. They're like
libtard millennials whose candidate lost a Presidential election.
--
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
Peter Trei
2017-05-04 20:28:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
Or because other people are.
This is a serious question - just difficult to ask because it tends to
be thought of an insult - but: do most Americans realise how.. different
their culture is from European and Canadian ones?
You have a massive army, more people in prison than most other western
countries, and you kill each other with great abandon.
You *do* know how odd all this is, don't you?
I think you need check your assumptions as to what is reasonable.
European countries have been able to get away with underspending on military
only *because* the US has been protecting them - The only a handful of NATO
countries meet their promises on spending, expecting the US to protect them
at it's expense, was a major issue during the election.
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a hefty
margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it hasn't been
invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Well, someone has to be highest, and it's unsurprising that the country with
the absolute highest GDP has the absolute highest spending. If you go by % of
GDP, the US is 11th. IOW, we can afford it.
http://www.indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?v=132

Many of the other NATO countries are free-riders on the US defense budget,
spending a fraction of what they've promised. If they lived up to their
commitments, the US could reduce its spending.

You might want to look at what Britain was spending prior to the 1990s
http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/past_spending
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Peter Trei
As for homicide rate, the US rate is currently near a 100-year low. Its simply
not as dangerous here as you think. The rate is about the same as Eastern
Europe, and much lower than Russia. Most Americans do not spend their days in
fear of being murdered - dying in a traffic accident is much more likely.
And yet you're way above most western nations, (from a brief look at the
Wikipedia entry, only Russia, Ukraine and Turkey are worse).
IIRC you also have a school or workplace shooting every 21 days, on
average - it's so common you drill for it, and most are no longer reported.
You missed a couple - Latvia, Lithuania, and Albania.

But seriously, we're arguing over "very low" vs "very very low". Most Americans
simply don't worry about being murdered on a day to day basis. In nearly 60
years, not a single person I know by first name has been murdered, though
two have died in car accidents.

[Caveat: The US murder rate is very unevenly distributed. If you look at the
homicide victim rate for non-Hispanic whites, it drops to about 2/100k (much
more within the Western European ballpark), from about 3.9 for the population
as a whole. The truly appalling numbers are among young black men:
https://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/black-americans-are-killed-at-12-times-the-rate-of-people-in-other-developed-countries/ (as always, check the dates,
since things change).]
Post by David Mitchell
C'mon, don't you think that's odd? I can only find three for the UK in
30 years. Yes, I know we don't usually have access to guns; but a
machete is about as dangerous to unarmed civilians as a gun, and they're
easy to get.
Access to guns isn't the issue; ever looked at the rate of gun ownership in
Switzerland? Britain had a lower homicide rate than the US long before it
banned guns.

Odd? No. The current European situation is odd (and laudable). The early
21st century is *very* odd when looking at the sweep of history:
https://ourworldindata.org/homicides/

pt
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-04 20:38:30 UTC
Permalink
On 5/4/2017 3:28 PM, Peter Trei wrote:
...
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Peter Trei
As for homicide rate, the US rate is currently near a 100-year low. Its simply
not as dangerous here as you think. The rate is about the same as Eastern
Europe, and much lower than Russia. Most Americans do not spend their days in
fear of being murdered - dying in a traffic accident is much more likely.
And yet you're way above most western nations, (from a brief look at the
Wikipedia entry, only Russia, Ukraine and Turkey are worse).
IIRC you also have a school or workplace shooting every 21 days, on
average - it's so common you drill for it, and most are no longer reported.
You missed a couple - Latvia, Lithuania, and Albania.
But seriously, we're arguing over "very low" vs "very very low". Most Americans
simply don't worry about being murdered on a day to day basis. In nearly 60
years, not a single person I know by first name has been murdered, though
two have died in car accidents.
I wish I could say that also. My brother-in-law was murdered here in
Houston for $65 in 1982.

Lynn
Cryptoengineer
2017-05-05 03:15:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
...
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
As for homicide rate, the US rate is currently near a 1 low.
Its simply not as dangerous here as you think. The rate is about
the same as Eastern Europe, and much lower than Russia. Most
Americans do not spend their days in fear of being murdered - dying
in a traffic accident is much more likely.
And yet you're way above most western nations, (from a brief look at
the Wikipedia entry, only Russia, Ukraine and Turkey are worse).
IIRC you also have a school or workplace shooting every 21 days, on
average - it's so common you drill for it, and most are no longer reported.
You missed a couple - Latvia, Lithuania, and Albania.
But seriously, we're arguing over "very low" vs "very very low". Most
Americans simply don't worry about being murdered on a day to day
basis. In nearly 60 years, not a single person I know by first name
has been murdered, though two have died in car accidents.
I wish I could say that also. My brother-in-law was murdered here in
Houston for $65 in 1982.
Thats terrible; I'm sorry for your loss.

pt
David Mitchell
2017-05-05 04:46:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
In article
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at
least parts of it from time to time to make
repairs to her interio. If she has something
like a skin she can run around in, within the
armour ... she is becoming much more confident
with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly
to her chassis with just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her
bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and
the next day wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
I am given to understand from popular American culture that
many people keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a
baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
Or because other people are.
This is a serious question - just difficult to ask because it
tends to be thought of an insult - but: do most Americans
realise how.. different their culture is from European and
Canadian ones?
You have a massive army, more people in prison than most other
western countries, and you kill each other with great abandon.
You *do* know how odd all this is, don't you?
I think you need check your assumptions as to what is
reasonable.
European countries have been able to get away with underspending
on military only *because* the US has been protecting them - The
only a handful of NATO countries meet their promises on spending,
expecting the US to protect them at it's expense, was a major
issue during the election.
Stil it's "the highest total military budget in the world by a
hefty margin". Don't you think that's excessive, given that it
hasn't been invaded since 1812 (Alaska doesn't count ;-)
Well, someone has to be highest, and it's unsurprising that the
country with the absolute highest GDP has the absolute highest
spending. If you go by % of GDP, the US is 11th. IOW, we can afford
it. http://www.indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?v=132
Do you don't think that inconceivable amount of money could be better
spent elsewhere?
That isn't meant to be facetious or rhetorical.
Post by Peter Trei
Many of the other NATO countries are free-riders on the US defense
budget, spending a fraction of what they've promised. If they lived
up to their commitments, the US could reduce its spending.
And you think it would?
Post by Peter Trei
You might want to look at what Britain was spending prior to the
1990s http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/past_spending
Not really what I was asking.
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Peter Trei
As for homicide rate, the US rate is currently near a 100-year
low. Its simply not as dangerous here as you think. The rate is
about the same as Eastern Europe, and much lower than Russia.
Most Americans do not spend their days in fear of being murdered
- dying in a traffic accident is much more likely.
And yet you're way above most western nations, (from a brief look
at the Wikipedia entry, only Russia, Ukraine and Turkey are
worse). IIRC you also have a school or workplace shooting every 21
days, on average - it's so common you drill for it, and most are no
longer reported.
You missed a couple - Latvia, Lithuania, and Albania.
But seriously, we're arguing over "very low" vs "very very low". Most
Americans simply don't worry about being murdered on a day to day
basis. In nearly 60 years, not a single person I know by first name
has been murdered, though two have died in car accidents.
Is the school shooting drill not a thing then?
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
C'mon, don't you think that's odd? I can only find three for the UK
in 30 years. Yes, I know we don't usually have access to guns; but
a machete is about as dangerous to unarmed civilians as a gun, and
they're easy to get.
Access to guns isn't the issue; ever looked at the rate of gun
ownership in Switzerland? Britain had a lower homicide rate than the
US long before it banned guns.
That's what I thought, I was pre-empting a possible argument.
Post by Peter Trei
Odd? No. The current European situation is odd (and laudable). The
early 21st century is *very* odd when looking at the sweep of
history: https://ourworldindata.org/homicides/
That's interesting, Are most Americans aware that things are very
different in most of the Western nations to which they might wish to be
compared?
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-04 17:33:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
Or because other people are.
This is a serious question - just difficult to ask because it tends to
be thought of an insult - but: do most Americans realise how.. different
their culture is from European and Canadian ones?
You have a massive army, more people in prison than most other western
countries, and you kill each other with great abandon.
You *do* know how odd all this is, don't you?
I think you need check your assumptions as to what is reasonable.
European countries have been able to get away with underspending on military
only *because* the US has been protecting them - The only a handful of NATO
countries meet their promises on spending, expecting the US to protect them
at it's expense, was a major issue during the election.
As for homicide rate, the US rate is currently near a 100-year low. Its simply
not as dangerous here as you think. The rate is about the same as Eastern
Europe, and much lower than Russia. Most Americans do not spend their days in
fear of being murdered - dying in a traffic accident is much more likely.
The numbers are also skewed by different reporting standards. The US reports as
homicide pretty any violent, apparently intentional killing. The UK, OTOH,
reports only cases where someone has been convicted of murder. Unsolved cases
aren't included.
I won't argue with the incarceration figure; I'm with you on that one.
pt
Me too. The War on Drugs, hawk ! spit !, has been a terror unto the
free people of the USA.

Lynn
Scott Lurndal
2017-05-04 18:00:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Peter Trei
I won't argue with the incarceration figure; I'm with you on that one.
pt
Me too. The War on Drugs, hawk ! spit !, has been a terror unto the
free people of the USA.
And your buddy Jeff Sessions wants to increase the terror 10-fold.
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-04 20:42:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scott Lurndal
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Peter Trei
I won't argue with the incarceration figure; I'm with you on that one.
pt
Me too. The War on Drugs, hawk ! spit !, has been a terror unto the
free people of the USA.
And your buddy Jeff Sessions wants to increase the terror 10-fold.
Sessions is just following the law. I blame Congress for the original
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 where this whole mess started.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Food,_Drug,_and_Cosmetic_Act

Of course, one could also blame the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 for
really getting the ball rolling.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_Food_and_Drug_Act

Lynn
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
2017-05-04 21:25:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Scott Lurndal
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Peter Trei
I won't argue with the incarceration figure; I'm with you on that one.
pt
Me too. The War on Drugs, hawk ! spit !, has been a terror
unto the free people of the USA.
And your buddy Jeff Sessions wants to increase the terror
10-fold.
Sessions is just following the law.
Selectively enforcing laws is a far bigger problem than overzealous
enforcement. That kind of thinking has led us to our current lawless
state, with cops cheering on rioters (if they agree with their
politics) and the current President imitating his predecessor in
usurping the legislative authority of Congress because Congress won't
do shit.
--
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
2017-05-05 00:29:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
Or because other people are.
This is a serious question - just difficult to ask because it tends to
be thought of an insult - but: do most Americans realise how.. different
their culture is from European and Canadian ones?
You have a massive army, more people in prison than most other western
countries, and you kill each other with great abandon.
You *do* know how odd all this is, don't you?
I think you need check your assumptions as to what is reasonable.
European countries have been able to get away with underspending on military
only *because* the US has been protecting them - The only a handful of NATO
countries meet their promises on spending, expecting the US to protect them
at it's expense, was a major issue during the election.
As for homicide rate, the US rate is currently near a 100-year low. Its simply
not as dangerous here as you think. The rate is about the same as Eastern
Europe, and much lower than Russia. Most Americans do not spend their days in
fear of being murdered - dying in a traffic accident is much more likely.
The numbers are also skewed by different reporting standards. The US reports as
homicide pretty any violent, apparently intentional killing. The UK, OTOH,
reports only cases where someone has been convicted of murder. Unsolved cases
aren't included.
I won't argue with the incarceration figure; I'm with you on that one.
And both the incarceration figure and the violent crime figures are
greatly inflated by our insistence on the War on Drugs and related
stupid-ass laws, which appear to have as their only true function the
provision of enough prisoners to support an increasing number of
for-profit prisons.
--
Sea Wasp
/^\
;;;
Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog:
http://seawasp.livejournal.com
Cryptoengineer
2017-05-05 03:32:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Peter Trei
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts
of it from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If
she has something like a skin she can run around in, within
the armour ... she is becoming much more confident with meat
people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her
chassis with just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next
day wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many
people keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is
a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
Or because other people are.
This is a serious question - just difficult to ask because it tends
to be thought of an insult - but: do most Americans realise how..
different their culture is from European and Canadian ones?
You have a massive army, more people in prison than most other
western countries, and you kill each other with great abandon.
You *do* know how odd all this is, don't you?
I think you need check your assumptions as to what is reasonable.
European countries have been able to get away with underspending on
military only *because* the US has been protecting them - The only a
handful of NATO countries meet their promises on spending, expecting
the US to protect them at it's expense, was a major issue during the
election.
As for homicide rate, the US rate is currently near a 100-year low.
Its simply not as dangerous here as you think. The rate is about the
same as Eastern Europe, and much lower than Russia. Most Americans do
not spend their days in fear of being murdered - dying in a traffic
accident is much more likely.
The numbers are also skewed by different reporting standards. The US
reports as homicide pretty any violent, apparently intentional
killing. The UK, OTOH, reports only cases where someone has been
convicted of murder. Unsolved cases aren't included.
I won't argue with the incarceration figure; I'm with you on that one.
And both the incarceration figure and the violent crime figures are
greatly inflated by our insistence on the War on Drugs and related
stupid-ass laws, which appear to have as their only true function the
provision of enough prisoners to support an increasing number of
for-profit prisons.
It's nice to find a point on which so many of us are in violent
agreement.
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-04 17:31:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Mitchell
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
I don't. I have night terrors very occasionally and having a weapon
handy is a very bad thing, especially for the wife.

Lynn
Jack Bohn
2017-05-05 06:38:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Mitchell
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
In my case it's a tennis racket, because I'm more scared of bats and birds. More than a handful of those intruders over the last 25 years, against one of the human kind, who ran!
--
-Jack
David DeLaney
2017-05-05 12:02:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jack Bohn
Post by David Mitchell
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
In my case it's a tennis racket, because I'm more scared of bats and birds.
And my bed doesn't have an "under" as such. Though anyone getting to it would
have to have managed to not be taken out by one stack or another of books
falling on them when they nudged them wrong.

Dave, RPG manuals are heavy, collectively, for one
--
\/David DeLaney posting thru EarthLink - "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
gatekeeper.vic.com/~dbd - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-05 22:55:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by David DeLaney
Post by Jack Bohn
Post by David Mitchell
I am given to understand from popular American culture that many people
keep a weapon near their bed. I believe a baseball bat is a popular choice.
This is because you are all savages. ;-)
In my case it's a tennis racket, because I'm more scared of bats and birds.
And my bed doesn't have an "under" as such. Though anyone getting to it would
have to have managed to not be taken out by one stack or another of books
falling on them when they nudged them wrong.
Dave, RPG manuals are heavy, collectively, for one
I used to have stacks of books in the bedroom in the 1980s. And then I
got a verbal warning from the wife. So I moved many of them to an old
wardrobe moving box in the garage. Then we got flooded and a foot of
water in the garage. And that was the Great Flood of 1989. Lost most
of my Heinleins and Asimovs. When one is ripping wet carpet out of the
house so the walls will drain and dry before the sheetrock is
permanently damaged, one does not think about the thousand books in a
single box in the garage until the next day. MMPB books make great
water wicks as they soaked water up over three feet.

Lynn
Lawrence Watt-Evans
2017-05-03 19:01:09 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 3 May 2017 12:42:53 -0500, Lynn McGuire
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
But we mah just see her one day wearing armour, and the next day
wearing a jumpsuit or something.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
Unmarried women who don't like guns.

Seriously, you needed to ask that?
--
My webpage is at http://www.watt-evans.com
l***@dimnakorr.com
2017-05-03 19:12:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
Experienced fair maidens.
--
Leif Roar Moldskred
They also keep a supply of burn ointment at hand.
Robert Carnegie
2017-05-03 21:22:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by l***@dimnakorr.com
Post by Lynn McGuire
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
Experienced fair maidens.
--
Leif Roar Moldskred
They also keep a supply of burn ointment at hand.
NSFW, https://notalwaysright.com/her-opinion-is-chaste/65102
Greg Goss
2017-05-04 05:35:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
People who don't believe in urban firearms?
--
We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
Robert Woodward
2017-05-04 16:59:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Greg Goss
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Well, in a day or two we may find out.
After Faye gets the pry bar out from under her bed.
OK, who keeps a pry bar under their bed ?
People who don't believe in urban firearms?
People who have read the entire run know that Faye was under treatment
for a while after her father committed suicide (with a gun); Faye
happened to be several yards behind him at the time (I doubt that he
knew she was there).
--
"We have advanced to new and surprising levels of bafflement."
Imperial Auditor Miles Vorkosigan describes progress in _Komarr_.
-------------------------------------------------------
Robert Woodward ***@drizzle.com
Greg Goss
2017-05-03 14:16:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
That was my expectation. But the strip has defied my expectations
before.
--
We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
Joe Pfeiffer
2017-05-03 22:57:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
That was always my assumption -- her armor is her "skin". Apparently
not (or else we're about to see a bunch of hydraulics and wires walking
around).
Dorothy J Heydt
2017-05-03 23:24:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Pfeiffer
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
That was always my assumption -- her armor is her "skin". Apparently
not (or else we're about to see a bunch of hydraulics and wires walking
around).
If that were the case, she'd probably not wish to take the armour
off. Don't you get the impression that Bubbles is a tad insecure,
and (possibly as a result) very modest?

I'm expecting to see her in a sort of jumpsuit. Or long-johns.
--
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
David Mitchell
2017-05-04 04:19:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Joe Pfeiffer
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
That was always my assumption -- her armor is her "skin". Apparently
not (or else we're about to see a bunch of hydraulics and wires walking
around).
If that were the case, she'd probably not wish to take the armour
off. Don't you get the impression that Bubbles is a tad insecure,
and (possibly as a result) very modest?
I'm expecting to see her in a sort of jumpsuit. Or long-johns.
I'm expecting to see her in something relatively easy to draw.
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-03 23:47:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Pfeiffer
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
That was always my assumption -- her armor is her "skin". Apparently
not (or else we're about to see a bunch of hydraulics and wires walking
around).
Uh oh, is QC going NSFW again ?

Lynn
Robert Carnegie
2017-05-04 20:14:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Joe Pfeiffer
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
That was always my assumption -- her armor is her "skin". Apparently
not (or else we're about to see a bunch of hydraulics and wires walking
around).
Uh oh, is QC going NSFW again ?
Nice Chassis, Fine Wiring?

(...point taken)
Dorothy J Heydt
2017-05-04 13:28:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Pfeiffer
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
That was always my assumption -- her armor is her "skin". Apparently
not (or else we're about to see a bunch of hydraulics and wires walking
around).
Today's strip is up, and we're seeing something that looks like
skin (that matches her face, medium light brown). We're also
seeing Faye sweating and cursing to get the backplate off.
--
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-04 17:39:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Joe Pfeiffer
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
That was always my assumption -- her armor is her "skin". Apparently
not (or else we're about to see a bunch of hydraulics and wires walking
around).
Today's strip is up, and we're seeing something that looks like
skin (that matches her face, medium light brown). We're also
seeing Faye sweating and cursing to get the backplate off.
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3474

Oh man, we may be headed for NSFW.

Lynn
David Johnston
2017-05-04 22:26:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Joe Pfeiffer
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
That was always my assumption -- her armor is her "skin". Apparently
not (or else we're about to see a bunch of hydraulics and wires walking
around).
Today's strip is up, and we're seeing something that looks like
skin (that matches her face, medium light brown). We're also
seeing Faye sweating and cursing to get the backplate off.
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3474
Oh man, we may be headed for NSFW.
Lynn
She's not anatomically complete, you know.
Lynn McGuire
2017-05-04 23:01:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Joe Pfeiffer
Post by Lynn McGuire
Post by Dorothy J Heydt
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Certainly it would be necessary to take off at least parts of it
from time to time to make repairs to her interio. If she has
something like a skin she can run around in, within the armour
... she is becoming much more confident with meat people.
I just figured that her armor was bolted directly to her chassis with
just her innards underneath.
That was always my assumption -- her armor is her "skin". Apparently
not (or else we're about to see a bunch of hydraulics and wires walking
around).
Today's strip is up, and we're seeing something that looks like
skin (that matches her face, medium light brown). We're also
seeing Faye sweating and cursing to get the backplate off.
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3474
Oh man, we may be headed for NSFW.
Lynn
She's not anatomically complete, you know.
Ah, a Barbie doll.

Lynn
David Johnston
2017-05-02 22:06:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Lynn
She'd already mentioned that in an earlier strip having to do with the
repair of the ex-con robot.
Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
2017-05-03 11:06:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
Lynn
She mentioned at least once before that her armor was, well, armor over
a body of some non-armored type before.
--
Sea Wasp
/^\
;;;
Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog:
http://seawasp.livejournal.com
Gene Wirchenko
2017-05-03 20:03:54 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 3 May 2017 07:06:20 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)"
Post by Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
Post by Lynn McGuire
Questionable Content: helping out
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3472
Bubbles armor is removable ? Who knew ?
She mentioned at least once before that her armor was, well, armor over
a body of some non-armored type before.
Well, yes. The alternative is the body being all armour which
leaves out body functionality.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko
Loading...