On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:20:36 +0000, Jenny M Benson
Post by Jenny M BensonPost by Nick OdellI started getting interested in "wet film" again after my son lead an
expedition down the Grand Canyon and returned with photos on film and
digital and the differences really stood out. I wouldn´t say one is
better than the other but they are decidedly different and I like the
difference.
Can you expand on that, please? In what way(s) different?
The easiest way to explain would be to show you those Grand Canyon
photos -which I have not got. Not here, anyway. But some technical
differences come to mind. Digital images are made up of neat,
rectangular pixels and however small they are, when you blow them up
they become -erme- pixelated. Photographic film stores the information
in amorphous grains and as you blow them up they become softer and
less distinct. Digital sensors have the different colour cells side by
side, colour film has them on top of each other in layers. Digital
sensors tend to add a certain amount of electronic "noise" whilst film
is more likely to suffer from dust and scratches though a good, well
looked-after camera of either persuasion will keep those factors to a
minimum.
They also make me think differently. I can keep clicking away with a
digital camera and chances are that one or two will turn out quite
nice. When I´ve only got 12/15/24/36/48/72 (1) frames available I am
more likely to think about what I am photographing before I go click.
I don´t think either one is better than the other one - I use both
analogue and digital cameras - but that it´s worth playing to the
strengths and weaknesses of each.
Nick
(1)The selection of film cameras available to me is left as an
exercise for the reader