Thus one may make reasonably critique Immanuel Kant's CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE perspectives as conforming to the #391 - HOMOIOS perspective
of NUMBER and accordingly we may then consider the CANONIC merit of the
T’AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #452 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason’s Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
in Annu; THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine
appearance in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.
#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
#TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
#POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
#TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45
As thereby providing the *ONTIC* mathematical *MORAL* premises which are
central to existence of being and its integrity, as the means one most
certainly and prudently can make #123 - JUDGEMENT:
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/thoth9.gif>
[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D /
#0 - 21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY PERENNIAL
SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9 METHODOLOGY
FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]
45: [1]
68: [42]
84: [2]
86: [10]
102: [4]
104: [7]
115: [5]
130: [3]
139: [13]
140: [14, 16] // #14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY; #16 - I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER
146: [15]
148: [12]
150: [28]
156: [21]
157: [17, 41] // #17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE; #41 - I HAVE
NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY
158: [23]
161: [9]
166: [11]
168: [26]
169: [18]
171: [20]
173: [27]
175: [22]
177: [29]
180: [19]
181: [24, 35] // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING
182: [6]
184: [36]
185: [25]
186: [31]
191: [32]
192: [39]
196: [37]
197: [33]
200: [8]
210: [30]
215: [34]
220: [38]
228: [40]
Of which the TEN COMMANDMENTS (ie. the TRIAD MICROCOSM / SEPTET
MACROCOSM) given by MOSES conform as *ONTIC* postulates (ie. #41 x n) of
NATURE {
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what
ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by the
circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
} as similarly being mathematical *MORAL* premises:
THE *MAJOR* *PREMISE* {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of
Universal Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *COURSES*
*OF* *PRIESTS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364
associated to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30
day intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days.
"And God spake all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {that troubles or oppresses;
anguish}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]
THE *MINOR* *PREMISE* {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
"... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the
LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my
commandments..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]
THE *CONCLUSION* {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of
Autonomy}, which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as
right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369
with SEPTET #41 centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1
Tishri 5762.
The Roman writer Censorinus, who in his 238 CE publication De Die
Natali, claims that the Pythagorean advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) as
preceeding PLATO (c. 429–347 BCE), as the principle proponent of the
Pythagorean doctrines, considered the natural year as also consisting of
364 and a half days and consistent with the Chinese HAN Dynasty (206
BCE-220CE) understanding (#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 days) of them.
[Pythagorean Sourcebook p 171]
The Chinese DAOist perspective of the natural year (as equivalent to the
New Testament notion as TROCHOS-course of NATURE-genesis [James 3:6])
associated to Yang Hsiung's treatise that was published within 4 BCE and
known as the "Canon of Supreme Mystery", reconciled it's unified
arrangement of the DAO TE CHING's #81 sections as specifically the
ternary (tetragrammaton) HOMOIOS paradigm value: TETRA: 60 -
ACCUMULATION, which is mapped to the I CHING's H64 designations (of
necessity some are repeated) as the binary paradigm value: H26 - GREAT
DOMESTICATION, RESTRAINING FORCE, GREAT ACCUMULATING, THE TAMING POWER
OF THE GREAT, GREAT STORAGE, POTENTIAL ENERGY;
According to the 4.5 day designations of this natural year cycle into
#81 sections, this would then equate the #CENTRE as 13 to 17 September;
"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the
LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus
20:7 (KJV)]
THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: It is
also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the Gregorian
calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made divisible by 22
to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew letters in a pattern
which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle of the Chinese 4 BCE
published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the year into 364.5 days
and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a magic square of #369
having a distinct mathematical property at centre of #41 for the
equivalent date of 13 September.
#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties;
that undresses}
As waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the spring of Torah
being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = EQUINOX of Wednesday
DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364) + #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday
DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the
Sabbath year of 'oth cycle
FIRSTLY I AM GOING TO SELF-DESCRIBE THE COGNITIVE PROCESS BY PROPOSITION
OF A HYPOTHETICAL Y-M-T-A MODEL WHICH I EQUALLY APPLY TO CHROMOSOMES:
#YOD - IS THE #CENTRE OF REALITY AS THE BEGINNING OF A WORD
#MEM - IS THE DELIMITATION OF ANY COGNITIVE EVENT AS THE ENDING OF A WORD
#TAU - IS THE CIRCUMSCRIBING OF ANY REALITY EVENT WHEREBY THE PROCESS AS
DISAMBIGUATION OF A WORD OCCURS
#ALEPH - IS THEN THE NEUROLOGICAL STREAMING OF THE COMPREHENSION
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
[IMAGE: The eye {Y-M-T-A} glyph]
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word
was God.
The same was in the beginning with God.
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that
was made.
In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it
not.” [John 1:1-5 (KJV)]
Whereby in terms of the WORD example the mind's phonetic apprehension
can become impeded and stressed as then either discordant or unknowing
of any word's entity (ie. as the manner by which you can distinguish a
car exhaust blow back as a sudden and an inexplicable bang from an
earlier experience of a bomb blast) is a priori and transitional towards
it's final comprehension by it's acceptable, customary and correct
orthography as Category of Understanding.
Thus the recourse in my view is to either effect a stratagem of #YOD /
#MEM amplification THERAPY by which AMBIGUITY is delimited and so that
the apprehension process occurs normally as unimpeded and becomes
de-stressed.
Or whether a prescription of a PSYCHOTROPIC {ie. the *TROPICAL* year is
determined by: #364 x 6 x 49 or #364 x 294 = #107016 days / 293 =
365.242321 days} pharmaceutical which whilst not impeding either the
apprehension or cognitive process is able to sedate the “central nervous
system and de-stressing of the startle reflex”.
But I am after all, seeking the advice of MENTAL HEALTH professionals on
how best to resolve such an injury given they do not have any
substantial practical clinical and case study expertise with instances
of bomb blasts experience and how to prevent it from progressing towards
a chronic condition known as POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER.
Making a reasonable supposition as a logical, probable and hypothetical
proposition, which is then predicated upon by a determined course of
affirmative action to inform oneself through inquisition as
elimination--is the process of a rational mind practiced in acquiring
knowledge and explicit specification within Categories of Understanding.
That in my view, punctiliousness has an intrinsic phonetic
correspondence and is a functional cognitive characteristic which is
intrinsic of the mind and this process is not all unlike the initial
starting point of this chapter by its specific construction of
meticulous narrative as neural linguistic streaming and it's subsequent
refinement until it was satisfactory.
For example, if all but the first and last letters are scrambled and the
sentence is entirely ambiguous, you can still disambiguate the word and
fully comprehend the sentence, as Cambridge University researchers have
suggested:
"Taht in my veiw, psciiouelnunsts is an insniirtc phteinoc
conrecoednprse and fancounitl cvgiinote cartarseiichtc of mnid."
<http://douglastwitchell.com/scrambled_words.php>
And therefore confusion like fear and paranoia which steadfastly and
habitually refuses to overcome its ignorant state by informing itself,
can then be considered delusional.
— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —
"IN DEAD OF NIGHT.
/ MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]
I HEAR THE CLARION.
/ CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2 -
Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents} /
#14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR.
/ VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone):
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]
3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123} 1) son, grandson, child, member of
a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and
female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons
(as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or
sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of
lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF*
*A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;
STEADFAST MIGHT.
/ POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]
MARCHING TO SION.
/ RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]
AGAINST THIS WHORE.
/ CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]
ARREST THE BLIGHT."
/ ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 = #287
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in excelso
{#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO ANAGRAM / Do
Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 - Autonomous Nature]
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what
ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by the
circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
Post by dolfWORK IN PROGRESS NOTES OF 15 JULY 2006 [SUBJECT TO REVISION]: WAS
GOVERNOR PHILLIP (11 October 1738 – 31 August 1814) A BETTER VISIONARY
LEADER THAN JOHN HOWARD?
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Flanders.pdf>
Kant’s *MOST* *INFLUENTIAL* *POSITIONS* *IN* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY* *ARE*
*FOUND* *IN* *THE* *GROUNDWORK* *OF* *THE* *METAPHYSICS* *OF* *MORALS*
(*HEREAFTER*, “*GROUNDWORK*” published 1785) *BUT* *HE* *DEVELOPED*,
*ENRICHED*, *AND* *IN* *SOME* *CASES* *MODIFIED* *THOSE* *VIEWS* *IN*
*LATER* *WORKS* *SUCH* *AS* *THE* *CRITIQUE* *OF* *PRACTICAL* *REASON*
(published 1781 / 1787)
<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/>
I. Transition from common rational cognition to philosophic moral cognition
II. Transition from popular moral philosophy to metaphysics of morals
III. Transition from metaphysics of morals to the critique of pure
practical reason
PROGRESSION: Lesser Yin (shaoyin: West / Autumn / Metal)
+ 0, H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + GEN (ie. #8) above],
H54 - GUIMEI [*MARRYING* *MAID* / DUI (ie. #7) below + ZHEN (ie. #3)
above] {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
SYNTHESIS: Greater Yin (taiyin: North / Winter / Water and which also
refers to the Moon)
+ 0, H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser Domestication/QIAN (ie. #6) below + SUN (ie.
#4) above], H18 - GU [Ills to Be Cured / SUN (ie. #4) below + GEN (ie.
#8) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
ANTI-THESIS: Lesser Yang (shaoyang: East / Spring / Wood)
+ 0, H3 - ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above]
as 'fundamentality [yuan], prevalence [heng], fitness [li] and constancy
[zhen]', H6 - SONG / *JIHAD*? [Contention/KAN (ie. #1) below + QIAN (ie.
#6) above] {ie. Self identity as Sea - Formula of Autonomy}
THESIS: Greater Yang (taiyang: South / Summer / Fire and which also
refers to the Sun)
+ H1 - *MONAD*: QIAN [Pure Yang / QIAN (ie. #6) above + QIAN (ie. #6)
below] as MALE, H2 - *DUAD*: KUN [Pure Yin / KUN (ie. #2) above + KUN
(ie. #2) below] as FEMALE, H3 - *TRIAD*: ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie.
#3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above] {ie. Fountains as Formula of Progression
of individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
Post by dolfIt would be followed by two more books on ethics: Critique of Practical
Reason (1788), The Metaphysics of Morals (1797), Anthropology from a
Pragmatic Point of View, Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason
as well as his essays on history and related topics. Kant’s Lectures on
Ethics, which were lecture notes taken by three of his students on the
courses he gave in moral philosophy, also include relevant material for
understanding his views. We will mainly focus on the foundational
doctrines of the Groundwork, even though in recent years some scholars
have become dissatisfied with this standard approach to Kant’s views and
have turned their attention to the later works. We find the standard
approach most illuminating, though we will highlight important positions
from the later works where needed.
With respects to the Egyptians {that troubles or oppresses; anguish}
claim to a Sovereign State as that which was then later the basis of
Roman Empire Governance, we draw upon this observation: "And Moses
{taken out; drawn forth} was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians
{that troubles or oppresses; anguish}, and was mighty in words and in
deeds." [Acts 7:22 (KJV)]
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ 1, 2, 3 {ie. Formula of Progression of individual phenomena} = GENESIS
DAY #4
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE = GENESIS DAY #1
H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81 as #WAN WU = GENESIS DAY #2
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE} = GENESIS DAY #3
FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THESE PRINCIPLES REFER TO IMMANUEL KANT'S TREATISE
Kant's supreme moral principle or "categorical imperative"; Variant
- Act only on that maxim which you can at the same time will that it
should become a universal law.
- Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become by thy will a
universal law of nature.
- So act that your principle of action might safely be made a law for
the whole world.
- May you live your life as if the maxim of your actions were to become
universal law.
- Live your life as though your every act were to become a universal law.
- Do not feel forced to act, as you're only willing to act according to
your own universal laws. And that's good. For only willful acts are
universal. And that's your maxim.
I do not, therefore, need any penetrating acuteness to see what I have
to do in order that my volition be morally good. Inexperienced in the
course of the world, incapable of being prepared for whatever might come
to pass in it, I ask myself only: can you also will that your maxim
become a universal law?
Even if there never have been actions arising from such pure sources,
what is at issue here is not whether this or that happened; that,
instead, reason by itself and independently of all appearances commands
what ought to happen; that, accordingly, actions of which the world has
perhaps so far given no example, and whose very practicability might be
very much doubted by one who bases everything on experience, are still
inflexibly commanded by reason … because … duty … lies, prior to all
experience, in the idea of a reason determining the will by means of a
priori grounds.
Morality is thus the relation of actions to the autonomy of the will,
that is, to a possible giving of universal law through its maxims. An
action that can coexist with the autonomy of the will is permitted; one
that does not accord with it is forbidden. A will whose maxims
necessarily harmonize with the laws of autonomy is a holy, absolutely
good will. The dependence upon the principle of autonomy of a will that
is not absolutely good (moral necessitation) is obligation. This,
accordingly, cannot be attributed to a holy being. The objective of an
action from obligation is called duty.
[<https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant>]
Kant developed three principal formulas of the categorical imperative.
The first and most well known of these is the so-called "formula of
universal law." The second is the "formula of humanity." This one has
been almost as interesting to commentators and critics as the first
formula. To some, in fact, the formula of humanity is an even more
interesting expression of Kant’s basic insights in ethics.
If the validity of the categorical imperative depends on humanity’s
existing as an end in itself, as it does according to Kant’s moral
realism, then the categorical imperative should forbid any action that
treats humanity merely as a means. By this line of reasoning Kant sees
that an alternative version of the categorical imperative can now be
expressed as: "So act that you use humanity, whether in your own person
or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end, never
merely as a means " (Kant 1997, 38/4:429).
THE FORMULA OF AUTONOMY
A third version of the categorical imperative follows in Kant’s text
almost immediately upon the four examples of duties derived from the
second version, the formula of humanity. This new formula, emphasizing
the way we may be supposed to have acquired our subjection to moral
requirements, is called the formula of autonomy. It says that we are
subject to the requirement of our maxims’ conformity to universal law
through our own free will. That is what Kant indicated in the quotation
above, referring to the will’s "giving the law to itself" (Kant 1997,
39/4:431).
The derivation of the formula of autonomy. The premises by which we
arrive at a version of the categorical imperative referencing
autonomy—the self-legislation of moral requirements—are the previous two
the ground of all practical lawgiving lies (in accordance with the first
principle) objectively in the rule and the form of universality which
makes it fit to be a universal law (possibly a law of nature);
subjectively, however, it lies in the end; but the subject of all ends
is every rational being as an end in itself (in accordance with the
second principle); from this there follows now the third practical
principle of the will, as supreme limiting condition of its harmony with
universal practical reason, the idea of the will of every rational being
as a will giving universal law. (Kant 1997, 39/4:431)
In order to see how we arrive at the formula of autonomy at the
conclusion of this derivation it is necessary to focus on the second
premise, the formula of humanity. Here the important concept of an "end"
implies legislation, or lawgiving. It is possible to see an end, like a
law, as something making it necessary to will an action—either as a
means of bringing about its existence, or in order not to bring about
its non-existence. If every rational being is an end in the latter
sense, as implied by the formula of humanity, then every rational being
is lawgiving. Here we do not conceive of something else—like
God—legislating that all rational beings are to be treated always as
ends, on account of their intrinsic value. Instead, the idea is that
each rational being, simply in virtue of being an end in itself, makes
necessary (legislates) that it be treated always as an end. The
legislation given by each is also universal, applying to itself as well
as to every other rational being. Hence, the third version of the
categorical imperative commands not acting on any maxim that could not
qualify as giving universal law.
[<http://myweb.ecu.edu/mccartyr/GW/FormulaOfHumanity.asp>]
Post by dolfImmanuel Kant’s postulates as transcendent principles are compliant with
the HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER AS THE REAL-NATURE OF THE SOUL OF MAN WITHIN
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ *1* - *MONAD*, *2* - *DUAD*, *3* - *TRIAD* {ie. Formula of
Progression of
individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {IE. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
There is no value having a discussion with and accordingly I don’t need to
labour on your behalf so as to convey the explicit quotes which I have
narrated elsewhere.
- dolf
Post by dolfKant’s writings are cognisant of a trinomial HOMOIOS mathematical
I'm going to stop you right there for some hit-counts.
Here are the hit-counts for the following words within Kant's
"Cognisant" - 0 (zero)
"trinomial" - 0 (zero)
"HOMOIOS" - 0 (zero).
So stop pretending your gibberish has anything to do with Kant's writings.
Kant's intention was to synthesise Empiricism with Rationalism, NOT to play
quantum-mumbo-jumbo with eastern mysticism and numerology and the bible.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
