Post by mainframetechPost by clavigerPost by mainframetechPost by clavigerPost by mainframetechPost by clavigerPost by Anthony MarshPost by clavigerHow many snipers and where were they located? For
any credibility we need type of bullet and trajectories.
I've given you some of the answer, with diagrams. You
have produced nothing.
The WCR and HSCA did all that before you. The SOTGK is
just as invisible today as he/she was almost 55 years ago.
Which really means that they accomplished the job they
were intended to handle with the public.
Is "they" the WCR and HSCA, or the snipers?
The shooters.
I'm going to ask a simple question: How many shooters do you
think were positioned around Dealey Plaza? Did the rifle shots
come from behind the Limousine? Did shots come from both
sides of the Limousine? Did any shots come from in front of
the Limousine? If the answer is yes to all the above it sounds
like the shooters had the Limousine completely surrounded.
That doesn't sound like a single simple question.
Please answer these basic questions:
How many shooters were positioned around Dealey Plaza?
Did any shots come from in front of the Limousine?
Did shots come from both sides of the Limousine?
Did rifle shots come from behind the Limousine?
Post by mainframetechThe evidence of bullet strikes in the plaza is that there were many
shooters around the plaza and they would be shooting toward the
limousine from many directions.
You are misusing the word "evidence". Please read the correct
definition for the word you are misapplying.
Evidence - the available body of facts or information indicating
whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
proof, confirmation, verification, substantiation,
corroboration, affirmation, attestation
LAW
information given personally, drawn from a document, or in the
form of material objects, tending or used to establish facts in a
legal investigation or admissible as testimony in court.
synonyms: proof, confirmation, verification, substantiation,
corroboration, affirmation,
Post by mainframetechOne particular scenario says there were 6 shooting teams of
4 each located in or on various buildings and other locations
around the plaza.
Do you concur with this scenario?
Post by mainframetechPost by clavigerPost by mainframetechOn the GK they simply put the weapons in the trunk of
a nearby car, and drove away...hastily.
Do you have any witness testimony on that?
Yes, the man in the RR tower (Lee Bowers) saw the men behind
the fence and told a friend of his named Walter Rischel, who
relayed it to a reporter.
Not what Lee Bowers told the police or testified to under oath.
Post by mainframetechPost by clavigerPost by mainframetechPost by clavigerPost by mainframetechPost by clavigerThen what happened to all those many rifles used in the
"classic triangulation of fire" ambush that according to
mft turned into a 20 gun fusillade from all sides?
WRONG! Don't even begin to use my name as having mentioned
"classic triangulation of fire". That's your blat, not mine.
The CTOF has been around for a long time and used by one
of the sources you like.
Not by me.
However you support that theory. When someone uses the term
"classic triangulation of fire" that usually means the target was
in the middle of sniper fire from 3 directions. They could also
fire from a 1-2-3 linear pattern from behind the picket fence. so
this is a second option. If multiple snipers maybe both.
When you acknowledged the theory of 20 snipers as a plausible
scenario and offered it up as realistic option to the official 3 shot
determination by the WCR, then you have adopted this stray cat,
and now have a responsibility to feed and water it.
I don't know of anyone that tried to say there were 20 shooters.
That would be a really dumb idea. I've said 6 shooter teams,
meaning 6 shooters.
As to plotters, I've said 20 at the front end, and 30 at the backend,
but they would also use others who were NOT in on the plot as helpers,
like the FBI as cleanup, or the Mafia as shooters. Those number have not
and will not expand.
We are discussing actual shooters who pulled a trigger in Dealey Plaza.
How many do you say there were?
Post by mainframetechPost by clavigerSounds like the numerous snipers had the Limousine surrounded
or they were all lined up behind the stockade fence and fired at
the Limousine like a shooting gallery.
Which do you believe?
Neither of course! Those are silly ideas.
You claim shooters were all over Dealey Plaza firing at the Limousine.
One behind the picket fence, one inside the tunnel, and one from the
South Pergola. That would be a triangulation crossfire right there.
A new source you injected into this debate claims 20 snipers fired at
the Limousine and you do not reject this theory at all, rather advocate
it as a real scenario that supports you contention that many snipers
were firing shots from all directions. So the question is where do you
think those 20 snipers were located?
Post by mainframetechPost by clavigerPost by mainframetechPost by clavigerPost by mainframetechAnd the "fusillade" was also not my idea, I'm repeating what I
read in a book which I've identified.
Fusillade means a whole bunch of shots at the same time. You
give support to a couple of CT authors who claim there were a
lot more snipers and shots fired than the 3 heard by a majority
of witnesses.
Now you're finally getting it.
So this is your Stamp of Approval on the scenario above?
Of course not! There's not a chance in hell you'd stumble on the real
scenario on your own. But you have the WCR to tell you what happened.
You need nothing more, right?
The WCR provided evidence to support three possible scenarios of
how 3 shots were fired at the Limousine. I believe another scenario
can explain 3/4 shots at the motorcade.
Post by mainframetechPost by clavigerWhere are those shots listed? If you agree why can't you paraphrase
where they came from and the pattern they used, such as 4 volleys
of 5 shots, something like that? You should be able to do that if you
understand and approve of this theory.
I do not talk of "theories" like the WCR needs. I talk about real
evidence of real events.
Can you explain some of this "real evidence" to clarify your confusing
theory about this ambush with 20 shooters firing at the Motorcade?
Post by mainframetechI can list them this time for you. There was a shot that struck JFK
in the forehead, and one in the throat, also one in the upper back.
That makes 3 shots. Where did they come from? Different bullets
or same caliber?
Post by mainframetechThen there was at least one that hit Connally, maybe more.
Then 2 more bullets. Same caliber? Same trajectory or from different
angles?
Post by mainframetechThen there was the shot that hit the right hand curb seen by officer
'Steve' Ellis,
Yes, where did it come from?
Post by mainframetechthen there was the shot through the windshield of the limo seen by 6
eyewitnesses,
One more shot.
Post by mainframetechand then there was a shot that struck the curb by James Tague and
sent a concrete chip flying into his cheek cutting him.
OK, where did it come from?
Post by mainframetechThen there was Wayne and Edna Hartman who saw 2 gouges on the
mid filed, and a cop told them it was bullet gouges in the dirt They
pointed at the GK.
So 3 more shots.
Post by mainframetechThere was one that struck a steel manhole cover in midfield that was
searched for in the grass and found by a DPD cop. It was never sent in.
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/98/7f/66/987f66dc89410920b710c8b4bc683202--warren-commission-shots-fired.jpg
Chris
That makes 12 shots, so where did the the other 8 shots come from?
Were they all 6.5 Carcano bullets or various calibers? Can you explain
the different angles of all these bullets so we can get a better idea the
directions they came from? That would help identify the locations of
all these shooters.