w***@gmail.com
2017-12-01 14:13:04 UTC
The following quote is pretty famous, from Martin Chuzzlewit:
"Home is a name, a word, it is a strong one; stronger than magician ever spoke, or spirit ever answered to, in the strongest conjuration."
Is the semicolon placed correctly? Most grammar guides tell you that a semicolon separates two closely related _independent_ clauses, meaning they could stand on their own as sentences if written that way.
It seems to me that "stronger than magician ever spoke, or spirit ever answered to, in the strongest conjuration" doesn't satisfy that fundamental requirement, unless "it is" or "the word is" is an implied part of the clause. None of the guides say that independent clauses can inherit implied parts from elsewhere.
If it were me, I would have put the semicolon after "word" because then the clauses can stand independently.
Home is a name, a word; It is a strong one, stronger than magician ever spoke, or spirit ever answered to, in the strongest conjuration.
Am I missing something?
"Home is a name, a word, it is a strong one; stronger than magician ever spoke, or spirit ever answered to, in the strongest conjuration."
Is the semicolon placed correctly? Most grammar guides tell you that a semicolon separates two closely related _independent_ clauses, meaning they could stand on their own as sentences if written that way.
It seems to me that "stronger than magician ever spoke, or spirit ever answered to, in the strongest conjuration" doesn't satisfy that fundamental requirement, unless "it is" or "the word is" is an implied part of the clause. None of the guides say that independent clauses can inherit implied parts from elsewhere.
If it were me, I would have put the semicolon after "word" because then the clauses can stand independently.
Home is a name, a word; It is a strong one, stronger than magician ever spoke, or spirit ever answered to, in the strongest conjuration.
Am I missing something?