The collective is WORSE than I thought

[JTEM]

On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.

The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158720434533

[Adam A. Wanderer]

JTEM <***@gmail.com> wrote in news:84346598-134f-4e7e-9036-b7a92a3fa453
@googlegroups.com:

Will JTEM ever tell the truth? No, he won't. So here's the real truth:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

<https://sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/what-i-would-say-
to-creationists-if-i-was-more-of-a-dick/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zascach>

<http://www.skepticblog.org/2013/08/28/stephen-meyers-fumbling-bumbling-
amateur-cambrian-follies/>

<http://tinyurl.com/grmdhtv>

<http://americanloons.blogspot.com/search?q=stephen+myers>

<http://tinyurl.com/zlcp8u9>

<http://donaldprothero.com/quotes.html>

<http://tinyurl.com/hp2vd4v>

<http://americanloons.blogspot.com/search?q=Lee+Strobel%27s>

<http://tinyurl.com/zbl54ww>

<http://tinyurl.com/j9nkey5>

<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6360/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zvyyhxn>

<http://listverse.com/2011/11/19/8-examples-of-evolution-in-action/>

<http://tinyurl.com/c72j7wv>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_replication>

<http://tinyurl.com/goxgec9>

<https://edthemanicstreetpreacher.wordpress.com/2010/04/09/dawkins-
berlinski/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zmv3xf2>

<https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2014/feb/06/22-
answers-creationism-evolution-bill-nye-ken-ham-debate>

<http://tinyurl.com/hwjf83d>

<http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/dumb-things-creationists-
say/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zq9wt5k>

<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/20/magazine/unintelligent-design.html?
_r=0>

<http://tinyurl.com/h7ubjta>

<http://www.eoht.info/page/Creationism+scientists+ranked+by+idiocy>

<http://tinyurl.com/h5y2gao>

<https://www.chess.com/groups/forumview/18-creationist-arguments-
debunked>

<http://tinyurl.com/zb7sfyr>

<http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Category:Creationism>

<http://tinyurl.com/zt8dycq>

<https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/jan/28/creation-origin-life-
future-adam-rutherford-review>

<http://tinyurl.com/hsj6u6y>

<http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/06/07/what-do-physicists-
think-of-michio-kaku/>

<http://tinyurl.com/j32bskg>

<http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/howscienceworks_16>

<http://tinyurl.com/3p4e7mx>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin>

<http://tinyurl.com/jyzjfar>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel>

<http://tinyurl.com/pcqylyj>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution>

<http://tinyurl.com/7vw8ozk>

<http://www.famousscientists.org/charles-darwin/>

<http://tinyurl.com/jpr7p5v>

<http://darwin-online.org.uk/biography.html>

<http://tinyurl.com/5p6znj>

"Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so
simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is
false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false.
What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious
commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than
a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by
granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but
calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an
enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Jay_Gould>

<http://tinyurl.com/jc3ckub>

<http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-human-evolution>

<http://tinyurl.com/jsalxfe>

<http://americanloons.blogspot.com/search?q=macarthur>

<http://tinyurl.com/jenrqkq>

<http://www.annualreviews.org/journal/ecolsys>

<http://tinyurl.com/z8o6zan>

<http://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/home>

<http://tinyurl.com/pwg6fak>

<http://tinyurl.com/hy7xymb>

<http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Falldidit#Falldidit>

<http://tinyurl.com/z4z77ra>

[Joe Bruno]

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158720434533

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evidence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

[Kevrob]

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158720434533

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evidence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

You guys are about as effective in changing people's minds in a.a
as you would be standing on street corners wearing sandwich signs.
Stop flooding the group with your pro-religion propaganda. It is
repetitive, off-charter and reeks of bad netiquette.

Kevin R

[Joe Bruno]

Post by Kevrob

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158720434533

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evidence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

You guys are about as effective in changing people's minds in a.a
as you would be standing on street corners wearing sandwich signs.
Stop flooding the group with your pro-religion propaganda. It is
repetitive, off-charter and reeks of bad netiquette.
Kevin R

I said NOTHING about religion. YOU CAN'T READ, dimwit.

[Kevrob]

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by Kevrob

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158720434533

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evidence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

You guys are about as effective in changing people's minds in a.a
as you would be standing on street corners wearing sandwich signs.
Stop flooding the group with your pro-religion propaganda. It is
repetitive, off-charter and reeks of bad netiquette.
Kevin R

I said NOTHING about religion. YOU CAN'T READ, dimwit.

If you expect me to believe your anti-evolutionism
isn't motivated by religious belief, you've got
another think coming, Tandy.

Screw off, troll.

Kevin R

[Joe Bruno]

Post by Kevrob

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by Kevrob

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158720434533

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evidence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

You guys are about as effective in changing people's minds in a.a
as you would be standing on street corners wearing sandwich signs.
Stop flooding the group with your pro-religion propaganda. It is
repetitive, off-charter and reeks of bad netiquette.
Kevin R

I said NOTHING about religion. YOU CAN'T READ, dimwit.

If you expect me to believe your anti-evolutionism
isn't motivated by religious belief, you've got
another think coming, Tandy.
Screw off, troll.
Kevin R

ROTFL! I've already made plain in numerous posts that I am not a Fundamentalist or a creationist. Moreover, I have explained in detail my reservations about evolution. What you conjure in that piece of meat you so laughingly call a "brain" is irrelevant.

[Joe Bruno]

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by Kevrob

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by Kevrob

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158720434533

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evidence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

You guys are about as effective in changing people's minds in a.a
as you would be standing on street corners wearing sandwich signs.
Stop flooding the group with your pro-religion propaganda. It is
repetitive, off-charter and reeks of bad netiquette.
Kevin R

I said NOTHING about religion. YOU CAN'T READ, dimwit.

If you expect me to believe your anti-evolutionism
isn't motivated by religious belief, you've got
another think coming, Tandy.
Screw off, troll.
Kevin R

ROTFL! I've already made plain in numerous posts that I am not a Fundamentalist or a creationist. Moreover, I have explained in detail my reservations about evolution. What you conjure in that piece of meat you so laughingly call a "brain" is irrelevant.

[Cloud Hobbit]

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by Kevrob

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by Kevrob

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158720434533

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evidence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

You guys are about as effective in changing people's minds in a.a
as you would be standing on street corners wearing sandwich signs.
Stop flooding the group with your pro-religion propaganda. It is
repetitive, off-charter and reeks of bad netiquette.
Kevin R

I said NOTHING about religion. YOU CAN'T READ, dimwit.

If you expect me to believe your anti-evolutionism
isn't motivated by religious belief, you've got
another think coming, Tandy.
Screw off, troll.
Kevin R

ROTFL! I've already made plain in numerous posts that I am not a Fundamentalist or a creationist.

So, you are just naturally stupid?


Moreover, I have explained in detail my reservations about evolution.

And have yet to establish any link between your reservations and reality and you can do nothing about the mountain of confirming evidence of evolution and the benefits that it has brought to science and medicine. It really doesn't matter what your reservations are, the evidence clearly shows them to be baseless just like your belief in the Exodus or Moses.

What you conjure in that piece of meat you so laughingly call a "brain" is irrelevant.

That's what we've been saying about you for a long time Mr. Prosecutor who practiced law. Mister quote mining asshole.

[Cloud Hobbit]

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by Kevrob

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by Kevrob

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158720434533

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evidence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

You guys are about as effective in changing people's minds in a.a
as you would be standing on street corners wearing sandwich signs.
Stop flooding the group with your pro-religion propaganda. It is
repetitive, off-charter and reeks of bad netiquette.
Kevin R

I said NOTHING about religion. YOU CAN'T READ, dimwit.

If you expect me to believe your anti-evolutionism
isn't motivated by religious belief, you've got
another think coming, Tandy.
Screw off, troll.
Kevin R

ROTFL! I've already made plain in numerous posts that I am not a Fundamentalist or a creationist.

Nope, just an asshole.

Moreover, I have explained in detail my reservations about evolution.

No, you haven't all you have done is say you think it hasn't been properly reviewed and that most people haven't read the book, all of which proves nothing.

You have not, will not and can not explain how if Evolution is a fraud, where do all the benefits that it's understanding have brought about, come from.

What you conjure in that piece of meat you so laughingly call a "brain" is irrelevant.

If you are going to pretend to as stupid as to claim evolution is false, it is your head that should be thrown to the pigs.

[ernobe]

Post by Cloud Hobbit

Post by Joe Bruno
ROTFL! I've already made plain in numerous posts that I am not a Fundamentalist or a creationist.

Nope, just an asshole.
Moreover, I have explained in detail my reservations about evolution.
No, you haven't all you have done is say you think it hasn't been properly
reviewed and that most people haven't read the book, all of which proves
nothing.
You have not, will not and can not explain how if Evolution is a fraud, where do
all the benefits that it's understanding have brought about, come from.
What you conjure in that piece of meat you so laughingly call a "brain" is irrelevant.
If you are going to pretend to as stupid as to claim evolution is false, it is your head that should be thrown to the pigs.

Evolution has not been properly reviewed, and the proof is the state of
modern psychology.

"All the benefits that it's understanding have brought about" is just
part of the hype of a political campaign designed to keep people
suppressed and ignorant of their true selves.

[Kadaitcha Man]

Kevrob, thou art a disease that must be cut away. Ye gleeking base

Post by Kevrob
You guys are about as effective in changing people's minds in a.a

Not even the actualisation of the heinous woo woo of Saint Else Where's
Jesus showing up in a UFO and dropping nuclear bombs on your fucking
head would change your mind.

Skepticism requires an open mind, not the slammed shut steel trap closed
mind of dogmatic skepticism that is endemic to alt.atheism atheistas.

[Joe Bruno]

Post by Kadaitcha Man
Kevrob, thou art a disease that must be cut away. Ye gleeking base

Post by Kevrob
You guys are about as effective in changing people's minds in a.a

Not even the actualisation of the heinous woo woo of Saint Else Where's
Jesus showing up in a UFO and dropping nuclear bombs on your fucking
head would change your mind.
Skepticism requires an open mind, not the slammed shut steel trap closed
mind of dogmatic skepticism that is endemic to alt.atheism atheistas.
--
Before you fucking well complain about the fucking swearing in my
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/01/170117105107.htm

ROTFL!!! That dumb clod actually thinks we are trying to impress a bunch of
lying, amoral atheists. I can't speak for the Christians or Moslems, but I can say definitely that Judaism does not want any of them.

[Cloud Hobbit]

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by Kadaitcha Man
Kevrob, thou art a disease that must be cut away. Ye gleeking base

Post by Kevrob
You guys are about as effective in changing people's minds in a.a

Not even the actualisation of the heinous woo woo of Saint Else Where's
Jesus showing up in a UFO and dropping nuclear bombs on your fucking
head would change your mind.
Skepticism requires an open mind, not the slammed shut steel trap closed
mind of dogmatic skepticism that is endemic to alt.atheism atheistas.
--
Before you fucking well complain about the fucking swearing in my
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/01/170117105107.htm

ROTFL!!! That dumb clod actually thinks we are trying to impress a bunch of
lying, amoral atheists.

What weould be impressive is if any of ever started being truthful.

I can't speak for the Christians or Moslems, but I can say definitely that Judaism does not want any of them.

You can barely speak for you. When you do it's all lies.

[Jeanne Douglas]

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by Kadaitcha Man
Kevrob, thou art a disease that must be cut away. Ye gleeking base

Post by Kevrob
You guys are about as effective in changing people's minds in a.a

Not even the actualisation of the heinous woo woo of Saint Else Where's
Jesus showing up in a UFO and dropping nuclear bombs on your fucking
head would change your mind.
Skepticism requires an open mind, not the slammed shut steel trap closed
mind of dogmatic skepticism that is endemic to alt.atheism atheistas.
--
Before you fucking well complain about the fucking swearing in my
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/01/170117105107.htm

ROTFL!!! That dumb clod actually thinks we are trying to impress a bunch of
lying, amoral atheists. I can't speak for the Christians or Moslems, but I can say definitely that Judaism does not want any of them.

Of course, you're trying to impress us. You wouldn't be posting here if that wasn't what you were doing. If not, then you'd be wasting your time.

[Cloud Hobbit]

Post by Kadaitcha Man
Kevrob, thou art a disease that must be cut away. Ye gleeking base

Post by Kevrob
You guys are about as effective in changing people's minds in a.a

Not even the actualisation of the heinous woo woo of Saint Else Where's
Jesus showing up in a UFO and dropping nuclear bombs on your fucking
head would change your mind.
Skepticism requires an open mind, not the slammed shut steel trap closed
mind of dogmatic skepticism that is endemic to alt.atheism atheistas.

Nobody here is not open-minded enough to accept that there could be a new discovery at any moment that may contradict a previously held idea. So far when it comes to evolution there does not seem to be any reason to be skeptical given the number of benefits ToE has brought us.


Do you know of some?

[Kadaitcha Man]

Cloud Hobbit, ye heartless adamant. Thou art a venomed ham hock, a
block-headed all-changing word, a fat-kidneyed poltroon, a pestilent

Post by Cloud Hobbit

Post by Kadaitcha Man
Kevrob, thou art a disease that must be cut away. Ye gleeking base

Post by Kevrob
You guys are about as effective in changing people's minds in a.a

Not even the actualisation of the heinous woo woo of Saint Else Where's
Jesus showing up in a UFO and dropping nuclear bombs on your fucking
head would change your mind.
Skepticism requires an open mind, not the slammed shut steel trap closed
mind of dogmatic skepticism that is endemic to alt.atheism atheistas.

Nobody here is not open-minded enough to accept that there could be a
new discovery at any moment that may contradict a previously held idea.
So far when it comes to evolution there does not seem to be any reason
to be skeptical given the number of benefits ToE has brought us.

You are terminally stupid. Only you are gibbering on about evolution.
The statement above refers to your ideological dogma, not to evolution.

Post by Cloud Hobbit
Do you know of some?

Ask some cunt who disagrees with evolution, you perpetually daft twat.

[JTEM]

Post by Cloud Hobbit
Nobody here is not open-minded enough to accept that

So as long as someone is telling you what you want
to believe, you're open to it.

Exactly.




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158992910623

[JTEM]

Post by Kevrob
You guys are about as effective in changing people's minds

I don't want to change the collective's mind.

Nothing I've said about Darwin hasn't been
confirmed by the collective. Darwin really did
plagiarize all of "His" ideas. He was never a
scientist. His theory wasn't "Evolution" it was
"Pangenesis," and yes it was utter rubbish.

YOU choose to believe in a fairy tale. In fact,
fairy tales are so important to you that you
can't bare to let them go. AND THEN you attack
theists because they're only 10 times better
than you, knowing they they operate on faith
and not facts...





-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158906043533

[Jeanne Douglas]

Post by JTEM

Post by Kevrob
You guys are about as effective in changing people's minds

I don't want to change the collective's mind.

Whte fuck is "the collective"?

[Gronk]

Post by Jeanne Douglas

Post by JTEM

Post by Kevrob
You guys are about as effective in changing people's minds

I don't want to change the collective's mind.

Whte fuck is "the collective"?

Voices in her head.

[hypatiab7]

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evidence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

Wow! Which website did you copy that garbage from - Conservapedia? You didn't even try to reword it to sound like you. Please credit the actual author. If you don't, you'll be admitting that you stole his words.

[Christopher A. Lee]

On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 03:25:45 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7

Post by hypatiab7

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review
of the evidence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which
drills into people's heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific
truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers have actually looked at the
evidence themselves.

He's insane. Evolution (what it actually is, not what lying religious
fundamentalists tell us) is an observed phenomenon that won't
un-happen.

Post by hypatiab7
Wow! Which website did you copy that garbage from - Conservapedia?
You didn't even try to reword it to sound like you. Please credit the
actual author. If you don't, you'll be admitting that you stole his words.

Anybody who denies the facts of evolution is either insane or
retarded.

[Jeanne Douglas]

Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 03:25:45 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7

Post by hypatiab7

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review
of the evidence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which
drills into people's heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific
truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers have actually looked at the
evidence themselves.

Is he saying only 10% of the people here have taken high school biology?

Post by Christopher A. Lee
He's insane. Evolution (what it actually is, not what lying religious
fundamentalists tell us) is an observed phenomenon that won't
un-happen.

Post by hypatiab7
Wow! Which website did you copy that garbage from - Conservapedia?
You didn't even try to reword it to sound like you. Please credit the
actual author. If you don't, you'll be admitting that you stole his words.

Anybody who denies the facts of evolution is either insane or
retarded.

[Joe Bruno]

Post by hypatiab7

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evidence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

Wow! Which website did you copy that garbage from - Conservapedia? You didn't even try to reword it to sound like you. Please credit the actual author. If you don't, you'll be admitting that you stole his words.

https://tinyurl.com/kuc5cu2

[Joe Bruno]

Post by hypatiab7

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evidence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

Wow! Which website did you copy that garbage from - Conservapedia? You didn't even try to reword it to sound like you. Please credit the actual author. If you don't, you'll be admitting that you stole his words.

They are my words.Unlike you and the other ignorant atheists, I am fluent in English.

[Tim]

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by hypatiab7

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evidence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

Wow! Which website did you copy that garbage from - Conservapedia? You didn't even try to reword it to sound like you. Please credit the actual author. If you don't, you'll be admitting that you stole his words.

They are my words.Unlike you and the other ignorant atheists, I am fluent in English.

Right, that's why you didn't know that evidenced was a word, LOL!

[Cloud Hobbit]

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by hypatiab7

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evidence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

Wow! Which website did you copy that garbage from - Conservapedia? You didn't even try to reword it to sound like you. Please credit the actual author. If you don't, you'll be admitting that you stole his words.

They are my words.Unlike you and the other ignorant atheists, I am fluent in English.

And yet, after 150+ years the consensus has not changed. Evolution is still a fact and has led to many advances in many scientific disciplines.

Your irrational position is that in all that time science has lied to the world's population and that must mean that all those advances have been lies as well. You see the problem? You are a fucking idiot and moron, just like all the other evolution deniers. There is no fantasy here, no propaganda, only the observable facts that you choose to deny either because you are as stupid as a rock or you are just another lame ass troll.

Until you have an explanation for why science would try and hoax the world for all this time and how they could possibly get awaY with it, you really should shut the fuck up so people will not think you are any more despicable and stupid.

[Jeanne Douglas]

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and
=20
Davej wrote:=20

Except we don't need to know it.

=20
You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
=20
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about=20
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.
=20
=20

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of th=

e evidence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people'=
s heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% =
of the believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

=20
Wow! Which website did you copy that garbage from - Conservapedia? You =

didn't even try to reword it to sound like you. Please credit the actual au=
thor. If you don't, you'll be admitting that you stole his words.

=20
They are my words.Unlike you and the other ignorant atheists, I am fluent=

in English.
And yet, after 150+ years the consensus has not changed. Evolution is stil=
l a fact and has led to many advances in many scientific disciplines.
Your irrational position is that in all that time science has lied to the w=
orld's population and that must mean that all those advances have been lies=
as well. You see the problem? You are a fucking idiot and moron, just li=
ke all the other evolution deniers. There is no fantasy here, no propagand=
a, only the observable facts that you choose to deny either because you are=
as stupid as a rock or you are just another lame ass troll.
Until you have an explanation for why science would try and hoax the world =
for all this time and how they could possibly get awaY with it, you really =
should shut the fuck up so people will not think you are any more despicabl=
e and stupid.

Not to mention how scientists from nations that are mortal enemies still agree on the science (leaving aside idiot Stalin and his pet Lysenko). What possible motive would they have to do that? (The same question goes to anthropogenic climate change.)

[ernobe]

Post by Cloud Hobbit
And yet, after 150+ years the consensus has not changed. Evolution is still a
fact and has led to many advances in many scientific disciplines.
Your irrational position is that in all that time science has lied to the
world's population and that must mean that all those advances have been lies as
well. You see the problem? You are a fucking idiot and moron, just like all
the other evolution deniers. There is no fantasy here, no propaganda, only the
observable facts that you choose to deny either because you are as stupid as a
rock or you are just another lame ass troll.
Until you have an explanation for why science would try and hoax the world for
all this time and how they could possibly get awaY with it, you really should
shut the fuck up so people will not think you are any more despicable and
stupid.

There is no problem with the evolution theory, so long as it is
recognized that what we are talking about is the evolution of a human
being, not an animal.

[Jeanne Douglas]

Post by ernobe

Post by Cloud Hobbit
And yet, after 150+ years the consensus has not changed. Evolution is still a
fact and has led to many advances in many scientific disciplines.
Your irrational position is that in all that time science has lied to the
world's population and that must mean that all those advances have been lies as
well. You see the problem? You are a fucking idiot and moron, just like all
the other evolution deniers. There is no fantasy here, no propaganda, only the
observable facts that you choose to deny either because you are as stupid as a
rock or you are just another lame ass troll.
Until you have an explanation for why science would try and hoax the world for
all this time and how they could possibly get awaY with it, you really should
shut the fuck up so people will not think you are any more despicable and
stupid.

There is no problem with the evolution theory, so long as it is
recognized that what we are talking about is the evolution of a human
being, not an animal.

Human beings ARE animals.

[Christopher A. Lee]

On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:38:19 -0500, "Jeanne Douglas"

Post by Jeanne Douglas

Post by ernobe

Post by Cloud Hobbit
And yet, after 150+ years the consensus has not changed. Evolution is still a
fact and has led to many advances in many scientific disciplines.
Your irrational position is that in all that time science has lied to the
world's population and that must mean that all those advances have been lies as
well. You see the problem? You are a fucking idiot and moron, just like all
the other evolution deniers. There is no fantasy here, no propaganda, only the
observable facts that you choose to deny either because you are as stupid as a
rock or you are just another lame ass troll.

They don't have genetics or its applied technologies in modern
medicine, modern agriculture and forensics on his planet, let alone
antibiotic-resistance, pesticide resistance, etc,

Post by Jeanne Douglas

Post by ernobe

Post by Cloud Hobbit
Until you have an explanation for why science would try and hoax the world for
all this time and how they could possibly get awaY with it, you really should
shut the fuck up so people will not think you are any more despicable and
stupid.

There is no problem with the evolution theory, so long as it is
recognized that what we are talking about is the evolution of a human
being, not an animal.

What a fucking moron.

Post by Jeanne Douglas
Human beings ARE animals.

Fazakerley.

[JTEM]

Post by Cloud Hobbit
And yet, after 150+ years the consensus has not changed.

Everyone still believes in "Transmutation," do they? And
it's government by some form of Lamarckism, just like
back then? That *Is* the "Consensus." Right?

If not, you're fucked up.

You're projecting your ignorant misunderstanding
of the present backwards in time, on to the past.






-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/156467659238

[Cloud Hobbit]

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158720434533

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evidence,

You have no idea what evidence is, that has been demonstrated many times.

but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

And of course that is based on your solid relationship with such scientists, right?

Do you honestly believe a false scientific idea could survive for 150+ years without being discovered? Do you really think that the evidence of such an error would not make international news in both science and regular news of import to the entire world? How did this fake theory become responsible for major breakthroughs across so many scientific disciplines?
It's you against a tidal wave of truth.

You are a moron and a liar.

[Jeanne Douglas]

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and
=20
Davej wrote:=20

Except we don't need to know it.

=20
You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
=20
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about=20
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.
=20
=20
=20
=20
-- --
=20
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158720434533

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evid=
ence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's head=
s the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the=
believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

So you're saying that 90% of American students don't get taught biology? In courses that demonstrate the evidence? And point at more advanced evidence for anyone to look at?

[Gronk]

Post by Jeanne Douglas

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and
=20
Davej wrote:=20

Except we don't need to know it.

=20
You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
=20
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about=20
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evid=
ence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's head=
s the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the=
believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

So you're saying that 90% of American students don't get taught biology? In courses that demonstrate the evidence? And point at more advanced evidence for anyone to look at?

Gollee!

[Christopher A. Lee]

Post by Gronk

Post by Jeanne Douglas

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and
=20
Davej wrote:=20

Except we don't need to know it.

=20
You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
=20
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about=20
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evid=
ence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's head=
s the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the=
believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

As usual, Mad Joe lies through his teeth,

The word for somebody who lies is "liar".

When he routinely lies like this, he shows why atheists are "always"
calling the theists who come here and lie, liars.

And he'll then lie that it is a mere difference of opinion.

Even though he has no reason even to be here, spewing his venomous
nastiness about atheists, which he also pretends is mere difference of
opinion.

Or his lies about reality - if he really believes the creationist
bullshit he obsessively wipes in our faces, then he's seriously
mentally ill.

And if he doesn't, he is also mentally ill - but in a different way.

Post by Gronk

Post by Jeanne Douglas
So you're saying that 90% of American students don't get taught biology? In
courses that demonstrate the evidence? And point at more advanced evidence
for anyone to look at?

If he actually believes those lies that he keeps posting here, then he
is seriously mentally ill.

Even if he doesn't, the fact that he obsessively keeps posting them to
annoy, also makes him mentally ill, just differently.

Post by Gronk
Gollee!

He certainly didn't have any.

[JTEM]

Macro evolution is NOT an alternative spelling
for "Evolution," shit for brains.

Oops, you can't follow a thread to save you life,
and you have no reading comprehension, so you have
no idea that you're currently SUPPORTING the idiotic
notion that biology is somehow "Evidence" for macro
evolution.

Carry on.




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/159809388668

[JTEM]

Post by Jeanne Douglas

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evid=
ence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's head=
s the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the=
believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

So you're saying that 90% of American students don't get taught biology?

The collective is mentally retarded, but "Biology"
is not in dispute. It's existence no more supports
macro evolution than it does creationism.

Post by Jeanne Douglas
In courses that demonstrate the evidence?

What evidence? Spell it out.

Post by Jeanne Douglas
And point at more advanced evidence for anyone to look at?

"Anyone" would include you. So spell it out.




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/159809388668

[Jeanne Douglas]

Post by JTEM

Post by Jeanne Douglas

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evid=
ence, but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's head=
s the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the=
believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

So you're saying that 90% of American students don't get taught biology?

The collective

Still waiting for you to tell us what "the collective" is.

Post by JTEM
is mentally retarded, but "Biology"
is not in dispute. It's existence no more supports
macro evolution than it does creationism.

There's no such thing as "macro evolution", you fucking idiot.

There's just evolution.

[Joe Bruno]

Post by Jeanne Douglas
There's no such thing as "macro evolution", you fucking idiot.
There's just evolution.

WRONG

From dictionary.com


macroevolution

noun, Biology.
1.
major evolutionary transition from one type of organism to another occurring at the level of the species and higher taxa.
Origin of macroevolution

[JTEM]

Post by Jeanne Douglas
There's no such thing as "macro evolution", you fucking idiot.
There's just evolution.

WRONG

Notice how all the "Other" empirical, science-based
people who care only for facts tore into them for
posting such ignorant disinformation?

No, wait, I meant "Notice the crickets chirping?"

It's an embarrassment to real secular people...






-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/159884113733

[Joe Bruno]

Post by JTEM

Post by Jeanne Douglas
There's no such thing as "macro evolution", you fucking idiot.
There's just evolution.

WRONG

Notice how all the "Other" empirical, science-based
people who care only for facts tore into them for
posting such ignorant disinformation?
No, wait, I meant "Notice the crickets chirping?"
It's an embarrassment to real secular people...

She's not rowing with both oars in the water.

Post by JTEM
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/159884113733

[Cloud Hobbit]

Post by JTEM

Post by Jeanne Douglas
There's no such thing as "macro evolution", you fucking idiot.
There's just evolution.

WRONG

Notice how all the "Other" empirical, science-based
people who care only for facts tore into them for
posting such ignorant disinformation?
No, wait, I meant "Notice the crickets chirping?"
It's an embarrassment to real secular people...

That's just the sound of the wind blowing through your empty head.

[Jeanne Douglas]

Post by Cloud Hobbit

Post by JTEM

Post by Jeanne Douglas
There's no such thing as "macro evolution", you fucking idiot.
There's just evolution.

WRONG

Notice how all the "Other" empirical, science-based
people who care only for facts tore into them for
posting such ignorant disinformation?
No, wait, I meant "Notice the crickets chirping?"
It's an embarrassment to real secular people...

That's just the sound of the wind blowing through your empty head.

These people are the worst and lamest bullies that ever existed. Why they think anybody would take their iinsults seriously is beyond me.

[JTEM]

The sock puppet changes but the stupidity
shines through...





-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/156467659238

[Kit]

Post by JTEM
The sock puppet changes but the stupidity
shines through...

In your case the stupidity is the full essence of you, JTEM.

-- Kit

Post by JTEM
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/156467659238

[JTEM]

Post by Kit
In your case the stupidity is the

You're presently DEFENDING the idea that
we don't need to know the truth, that it's
perfectly acceptable it believe in a
fairy tale.

Are you even aware of this fact?

Seriously, did you know what you're defending,
or are you honestly as retarded as you seem?

HINT: Go back and read the first post, dimwit.





-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/161052484291

[JTEM]

Post by Jeanne Douglas
Still waiting for you to tell us what "the collective" is.

You keep insisting that you're clueless, but
I don't see anybody disputing you...

Post by Jeanne Douglas

Post by JTEM
is mentally retarded, but "Biology"
is not in dispute. It's existence no more supports
macro evolution than it does creationism.

There's no such thing as "macro evolution"

You're a fucking idiot. No, wait. I'm serious. You
are a fucking idiot.

I suggest you try Google. Ask a grownup to help.

Good luck!




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/159888508233

[Jeanne Douglas]

Post by JTEM

Post by Jeanne Douglas
Still waiting for you to tell us what "the collective" is.

You keep insisting that you're clueless, but
I don't see anybody disputing you...

Wow, you are so incredibly lame at insults and attempted bullying. You want to be Mr. Intimidating, but you just come across as a scared little boy trying to be tough.

[Joe Bruno]

Post by Jeanne Douglas

Post by JTEM

Post by Jeanne Douglas
Still waiting for you to tell us what "the collective" is.

You keep insisting that you're clueless, but
I don't see anybody disputing you...

Wow, you are so incredibly lame at insults and attempted bullying. You want to be Mr. Intimidating, but you just come across as a scared little boy trying to be tough.

Stlck your head up your ass. There, you will meet your intellectual equals.

[Cloud Hobbit]

Post by JTEM

Post by Jeanne Douglas
Still waiting for you to tell us what "the collective" is.

You keep insisting that you're clueless, but
I don't see anybody disputing you...

Post by Jeanne Douglas

Post by JTEM
is mentally retarded, but "Biology"
is not in dispute. It's existence no more supports
macro evolution than it does creationism.

There's no such thing as "macro evolution"

You're a fucking idiot. No, wait. I'm serious. You
are a fucking idiot.
I suggest you try Google. Ask a grownup to help.
Good luck!
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/159888508233

Why not see if you find anybody no affiliated with some theistic bullshit group like IRC of DI and see if they can confirm your lies.

I'll save you the trouble, there are none.

[Cloud Hobbit]

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158720434533

The consensus for evolution is not based on an objective review of the evidence

That is one of the dumbest lies you have ever told. It's 150 years since Origins and it has been reviewed 12 ways from Sunday, It's a fact. Darwin figured out how that fact happens and so did Wallace but with a slightly different conclusion. Both found that evolution occurs through natural selection.

but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's heads the simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers have actually looked at the evidence themselves.

There's the second dumbest thing you've ever said.
What would be the purpose for that? Why would there be a giant fraud? For what purpose. If it is a fraud, then why is there new medical disciplines because of it, new medicine because of it, benefits to agriculture, paleontology, archaeology and on and on. All of those disciplines would have to be in on the hoax. You really think that's likely?

The science books I had dealt with evolution and explained it in well enough.

When you know there are positives because of the understanding by others of ToE, you don't need to read Darwin's book, real life is proving it every day.
That's the part you don't seem to get, there are many, many benefits to mankind because of the Theory of Evolution by Natura Selection that are happening every day. Or do you think they invented evolutionary biology as part of the hoax?

[ernobe]

Post by Cloud Hobbit
That is one of the dumbest lies you have ever told. It's 150 years since
Origins and it has been reviewed 12 ways from Sunday, It's a fact. Darwin
figured out how that fact happens and so did Wallace but with a slightly
different conclusion. Both found that evolution occurs through natural
selection.
but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's heads the
simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers
have actually looked at the evidence themselves.
There's the second dumbest thing you've ever said.
What would be the purpose for that? Why would there be a giant fraud? For what
purpose. If it is a fraud, then why is there new medical disciplines because of
it, new medicine because of it, benefits to agriculture, paleontology,
archaeology and on and on. All of those disciplines would have to be in on the
hoax. You really think that's likely?
The science books I had dealt with evolution and explained it in well enough.
When you know there are positives because of the understanding by others of ToE,
you don't need to read Darwin's book, real life is proving it every day.
That's the part you don't seem to get, there are many, many benefits to mankind
because of the Theory of Evolution by Natura Selection that are happening every
day. Or do you think they invented evolutionary biology as part of the hoax?

According to evolutionary biology, humans evolved from apes. This
informs much of contemporary psychology, according to which people have the
tendency to show their ape-like qualities due to environmental
circumstances, without them knowing about it. Evolutionary biology
has not been able to show that one species evolves into another one. At
most, it says that a unicellular level it is impossible to distinguish
an animal from a plant. But that in no way implies that once it has
become one or the other, the process is reversible.

The very drilling into peoples' minds of the evolution mantra is part of
the psychological campaign by which politicians of all persuations seek
to maintain or gain control over people. I encourage non-believers to
re-examine the evidence for evolution, and see if it is proposing for
them a world in which they and their children would like to live in.
Since their educational system rejects books on religion, the evolution
that is happening and could benefit them remains out of their reach.

[Jeanne Douglas]

Post by ernobe

Post by Cloud Hobbit
That is one of the dumbest lies you have ever told. It's 150 years since
Origins and it has been reviewed 12 ways from Sunday, It's a fact. Darwin
figured out how that fact happens and so did Wallace but with a slightly
different conclusion. Both found that evolution occurs through natural
selection.
but, rather, on a propaganda campaign which drills into people's heads the
simple mantra "evolution is scientific truth."I doubt that 10% of the believers
have actually looked at the evidence themselves.
There's the second dumbest thing you've ever said.
What would be the purpose for that? Why would there be a giant fraud? For what
purpose. If it is a fraud, then why is there new medical disciplines because of
it, new medicine because of it, benefits to agriculture, paleontology,
archaeology and on and on. All of those disciplines would have to be in on the
hoax. You really think that's likely?
The science books I had dealt with evolution and explained it in well enough.
When you know there are positives because of the understanding by others of ToE,
you don't need to read Darwin's book, real life is proving it every day.
That's the part you don't seem to get, there are many, many benefits to mankind
because of the Theory of Evolution by Natura Selection that are happening every
day. Or do you think they invented evolutionary biology as part of the hoax?

According to evolutionary biology, humans evolved from apes.

No need to read past this silly statement.


We ARE ape.

[hypatiab7]

Post by JTEM
On all the fictional built on Darwin and

Except we don't need to know it.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.

No, he arguing against deliberate ignorance - yours.

Post by JTEM
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science -- objective truth -- and you're defending
a myth, claiming that we don't need to know what
reality is.

It's been proved and added to for over a century. And the parts he got
wrong, he either corrected himself or later scientists corrected. That's
how science works. If an error is found, it is admitted and corrected.
Religion never admits its mistakes. You can't accept this either for
religious reasons or you're just a troll phony who simply likes to try
to upset people. You don't upset or anger anyone in alt.atheism (and
haven't for a long time). We know you're a fake .... and a flake.

Post by JTEM
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158720434533

[Davej]

Post by JTEM

Originality is a matter for science historians.

You're rationalizing.
That's no different than "The Priests will let
us what we need to know."

Except we don't need to know it. Darwin published in
1859 because Alfred Russell Wallace was about to publish
the same idea. The idea was becoming obvious to all the
naturalists of the time.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science...

WTF are you gibbering on about? The theory of evolution
is rather apparent and would exist with or without Charles
Darwin. It would have been published by Wallace and promoted
by Huxley, Lyell and other British naturalists.

[JTEM]

Speaking of trolls...

Post by Davej
WTF are you gibbering on about? The theory of evolution

Evolution? Darwin's theory was PANGENESIS. Not evolution.

You keep reacting to shadows in your own head, pretending
that you're replying to me...




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158906043533

[Gronk]

Post by Davej

Post by JTEM

Originality is a matter for science historians.

You're rationalizing.
That's no different than "The Priests will let
us what we need to know."

Except we don't need to know it. Darwin published in
1859 because Alfred Russell Wallace was about to publish
the same idea. The idea was becoming obvious to all the
naturalists of the time.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science...

WTF are you gibbering on about? The theory of evolution
is rather apparent and would exist with or without Charles
Darwin. It would have been published by Wallace and promoted
by Huxley, Lyell and other British naturalists.

It's where the evidence and logic would lead us.

[JTEM]

I love it!

The collective can't even follow an informal
conversation EVEN WHEN THE WHOLE DAMN THIS IS
ARCHIVED yet it thinks itself capable of
following actual science...

Post by Gronk

Post by Davej

Post by JTEM
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science...

WTF are you gibbering on about? The theory of evolution
is rather apparent and would exist with or without Charles
Darwin.

Great. I was talking about the myth of Darwin, you
jackass, not evolution.

Post by Gronk
It's where the evidence and logic would lead us.

Well the "Evidence" is that you saw a thread about
Darwin and imagined it was about evolution... that
evidence seems to falsify the hypothesis that you
are not an idiot.




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158991323193

[Joe Bruno]

Post by JTEM
I love it!
The collective can't even follow an informal
conversation EVEN WHEN THE WHOLE DAMN THIS IS
ARCHIVED yet it thinks itself capable of
following actual science...

They have no memory. They make the same dumb mistakes over and over.

[Tim]

Post by Joe Bruno

Post by JTEM
I love it!
The collective can't even follow an informal
conversation EVEN WHEN THE WHOLE DAMN THIS IS
ARCHIVED yet it thinks itself capable of
following actual science...

They have no memory. They make the same dumb mistakes over and over.

Says captain quiz, the guy who can't figure out how many questions are in his own fucking quiz! LOL!!!

[Gronk]

Post by JTEM
I love it!
The collective can't even follow an informal
conversation EVEN WHEN THE WHOLE DAMN THIS IS
ARCHIVED yet it thinks itself capable of
following actual science...

Post by JTEM

Originality is a matter for science historians.

You're rationalizing.
That's no different than "The Priests will let
us what we need to know."

Except we don't need to know it. Darwin published in
1859 because Alfred Russell Wallace was about to publish
the same idea. The idea was becoming obvious to all the
naturalists of the time.

You're arguing in favor of ignorance. You're
actually arguing for ignorance.
The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science...

WTF are you gibbering on about? The theory of evolution
is rather apparent and would exist with or without Charles
Darwin. It would have been published by Wallace and promoted
by Huxley, Lyell and other British naturalists.

It's where the evidence and logic would lead us.

Darwin. Wallace. Same idea...

Post by JTEM

Post by JTEM

The myth of Darwin is taught in schools. It's
foundational. You're pretending to care about
reality, you're pretending to care about
science...

WTF are you gibbering on about? The theory of evolution
is rather apparent and would exist with or without Charles
Darwin.

Great. I was talking about the myth of Darwin, you
jackass, not evolution.

Post by JTEM
It's where the evidence and logic would lead us.

Well the "Evidence" is that you saw a thread about
Darwin and imagined it was about evolution... that
evidence seems to falsify the hypothesis that you
are not an idiot.
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158991323193

[JTEM]

Post by Davej
WTF are you gibbering on about? The theory of evolution

The collective is so devoid of comprehension that it
clearly thinks "Darwin" is an alternative spelling of
"The Theory of Evolution."

Hey, jackass: Darwin's "Theory" was called pangenesis.

Google it.

Stop being a mockery of yourself and just Google it.





-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/159582656118

[Jeanne Douglas]

Post by JTEM
I love it!
The collective

What the fuck is "The collective"?