Discussion:
What happened to the Doctor's wife?
(too old to reply)
Agamemnon
2018-06-30 10:45:55 UTC
Permalink
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?

Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.

Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
solar penguin
2018-06-30 10:51:06 UTC
Permalink
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or even
former wives.
Timothy Bruening
2018-06-30 11:14:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or even
former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
The Doctor
2018-06-30 13:48:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or even
former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
Unfortunately!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Daniel60
2018-07-01 12:48:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or even
former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
Unfortunately!
... but they've partnered them for ages!!
--
Daniel
The Last Doctor
2018-07-01 12:57:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daniel60
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or even
former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
Unfortunately!
... but they've partnered them for ages!!
Good to see that Dave thinks it’s unfortunate that it’s taken so long for
women to be able to marry each other. First Liberal thing he’s ever said!

Tim - your comment is irrelevant. How do you know what the marriage rules
on Gallifrey are, which is the key question here? Clearly, in a species
where gender is mutable, any agreement akin to marriage would be
gender-blind by definition. Hence TRLA’s initial assertion is nonsense.
--
There are some corners of the universe which have bred the most terrible
things. Things which act against everything we believe in. They must be
fought.
The Doctor
2018-07-01 13:07:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daniel60
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or even
former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
Unfortunately!
... but they've partnered them for ages!!
Good to see that Dave thinks it’s unfortunate that it’s taken so long for
women to be able to marry each other. First Liberal thing he’s ever said!
Tim - your comment is irrelevant. How do you know what the marriage rules
on Gallifrey are, which is the key question here? Clearly, in a species
where gender is mutable, any agreement akin to marriage would be
gender-blind by definition. Hence TRLA’s initial assertion is nonsense.
--
There are some corners of the universe which have bred the most terrible
things. Things which act against everything we believe in. They must be
fought.
And hence oppostition to Whittaker and Chibnall!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Agamemnon
2018-07-01 18:48:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Daniel60
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or even
former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
Unfortunately!
... but they've partnered them for ages!!
Good to see that Dave thinks it’s unfortunate that it’s taken so long for
women to be able to marry each other. First Liberal thing he’s ever said!
He said nothing of the kind. Your comprehension skills are seriously
lacking.
Post by The Last Doctor
Tim - your comment is irrelevant. How do you know what the marriage rules
on Gallifrey are, which is the key question here? Clearly, in a species
where gender is mutable, any agreement akin to marriage would be
gender-blind by definition. Hence TRLA’s initial assertion is nonsense.
Time Lords changing Gender is not cannon, it's sexist, misandiristic,
LGBT bollocks inflicted on the new series by Chibnall and Moffat; since
Susan calls the Doctor, "grandfather", and the Doctor calls her his
"granddaughter", not "grandparent" or "grandchild".

What happens to Leela if Andred becomes a woman, and David if Susan
becomes a man? It's completely ridiculous LGBT SJW brainwashing.
The Doctor
2018-07-01 19:29:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Daniel60
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or even
former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
Unfortunately!
... but they've partnered them for ages!!
Good to see that Dave thinks it’s unfortunate that it’s taken so long for
women to be able to marry each other. First Liberal thing he’s ever said!
He said nothing of the kind. Your comprehension skills are seriously
lacking.
Tim - your comment is irrelevant. How do you know what the marriage rules
on Gallifrey are, which is the key question here? Clearly, in a species
where gender is mutable, any agreement akin to marriage would be
gender-blind by definition. Hence TRLA’s initial assertion is nonsense.
Time Lords changing Gender is not cannon, it's sexist, misandiristic,
LGBT bollocks inflicted on the new series by Chibnall and Moffat; since
Susan calls the Doctor, "grandfather", and the Doctor calls her his
"granddaughter", not "grandparent" or "grandchild".
What happens to Leela if Andred becomes a woman, and David if Susan
becomes a man? It's completely ridiculous LGBT SJW brainwashing.
Exactly AGA!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
solar penguin
2018-07-01 21:19:25 UTC
Permalink
Repost, since the original doesn't seem to be showing up. My apologies
if anyone sees this twice.

On Sunday, 1 July 2018 19:48:11 UTC+1, Aggy arrogantly asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Time Lords changing Gender is not cannon
1. It should be "are" not "is" (since Time Lords are plural, even when
they're changing gender.)

2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)

3. It should be "canon" not "cannon" (since you probably didn't mean to
say that they're not a device for firing projectiles.)

4. The word "not" shouldn't be there (since Time Lords changing gender
are canon.)

Four mistakes in seven words. Are you trying to challenge Yads for the
record?
Post by Agamemnon
it's sexist, misandiristic, LGBT bollocks inflicted on the new series
by Chibnall and Moffat; since Susan calls the Doctor, "grandfather",
and the Doctor calls her his "granddaughter", not "grandparent" or
"grandchild".
What would happen if your own grandfather had a sex change operation
here on Earth? You'd ask her if she still wanted to be called
"grandfather" or whether she preferred to be "grandmother" now, and
you'd respect her wishes. Problem solved. Simple as that.

If we mere humans can deal with it, then so can the Time Lords.
They are smarter than us, after all.
Agamemnon
2018-07-01 21:31:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by solar penguin
Repost, since the original doesn't seem to be showing up. My apologies
if anyone sees this twice.
On Sunday, 1 July 2018 19:48:11 UTC+1, Aggy arrogantly asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Time Lords changing Gender is not cannon
1. It should be "are" not "is" (since Time Lords are plural, even when
they're changing gender.)
The clause being referred to by "is" is "Time Lords Changing Gender"
therefore it is "is", as in Jo and Katya is the winning couple on Strictly.
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Post by solar penguin
3. It should be "canon" not "cannon" (since you probably didn't mean to
say that they're not a device for firing projectiles.)
Whatever.
Post by solar penguin
4. The word "not" shouldn't be there (since Time Lords changing gender
are canon.)
Wrong. They are not canon.
Post by solar penguin
Four mistakes in seven words. Are you trying to challenge Yads for the
record?
There were no mistakes except cannon.
Post by solar penguin
Post by Agamemnon
it's sexist, misandiristic, LGBT bollocks inflicted on the new series
by Chibnall and Moffat; since Susan calls the Doctor, "grandfather",
and the Doctor calls her his "granddaughter", not "grandparent" or
"grandchild".
What would happen if your own grandfather had a sex change operation
here on Earth? You'd ask her if she still wanted to be called
"grandfather" or whether she preferred to be "grandmother" now, and
you'd respect her wishes. Problem solved. Simple as that.
That ain't going to happen.
Post by solar penguin
If we mere humans can deal with it, then so can the Time Lords.
They are smarter than us, after all.
The Time Lords should have evolved a specific genderless terminology.
They have not, therefore, Time Lords changing Gender, is not canon.
solar penguin
2018-07-01 22:15:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
Repost, since the original doesn't seem to be showing up. My apologies
if anyone sees this twice.
On Sunday, 1 July 2018 19:48:11 UTC+1, Aggy arrogantly asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Time Lords changing Gender is not cannon
1. It should be "are" not "is" (since Time Lords are plural, even when
they're changing gender.)
The clause being referred to by "is" is "Time Lords Changing Gender"
therefore it is "is", as in Jo and Katya is the winning couple on Strictly.
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Does your local council run evening classes? If so, sign up for one on
basic English grammar right away. And promise us you won't even think
about editing a script on your crowdfunded series until you've done so.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
3. It should be "canon" not "cannon" (since you probably didn't mean to
say that they're not a device for firing projectiles.)
Whatever.
Post by solar penguin
4. The word "not" shouldn't be there (since Time Lords changing gender
are canon.)
Wrong. They are not canon.
Wrong. (Hint: arrange the words "Whittaker" and "Jodie" into the
correct order.)
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
Four mistakes in seven words. Are you trying to challenge Yads for the
record?
There were no mistakes except cannon.
Wrong.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
What would happen if your own grandfather had a sex change operation
here on Earth? You'd ask her if she still wanted to be called
"grandfather" or whether she preferred to be "grandmother" now, and
you'd respect her wishes. Problem solved. Simple as that.
That ain't going to happen.
Well, duh! That's the whole point of a "What if" scenario. It's not
a "What will happen" scenario.
Post by Agamemnon
The Time Lords should have evolved a specific genderless terminology.
They have not, therefore, Time Lords changing Gender, is not canon.
We have sex change facilities, but still use gendered terminology.
Agamemnon
2018-07-01 22:26:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by solar penguin
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
Repost, since the original doesn't seem to be showing up. My apologies
if anyone sees this twice.
On Sunday, 1 July 2018 19:48:11 UTC+1, Aggy arrogantly asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Time Lords changing Gender is not cannon
1. It should be "are" not "is" (since Time Lords are plural, even when
they're changing gender.)
The clause being referred to by "is" is "Time Lords Changing Gender"
therefore it is "is", as in Jo and Katya is the winning couple on Strictly.
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Does your local council run evening classes? If so, sign up for one on
basic English grammar right away. And promise us you won't even think
about editing a script on your crowdfunded series until you've done so.
Your simplistic grammar is not appropriate for the above situation. You
are the one who needs to take evening classes, but I doubt they go
beyond the simplistic level either.

"Time Lords changing Gender" is the subject of canon, not are the
subject. I also suggest you read the Socratic Dialogue of Parmenides
which will also teach you that one is many and many is one, as well as
enlightening you about the philosophical basis of quantum mechanics and
relativity.
Post by solar penguin
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
3. It should be "canon" not "cannon" (since you probably didn't mean to
say that they're not a device for firing projectiles.)
Whatever.
Post by solar penguin
4. The word "not" shouldn't be there (since Time Lords changing gender
are canon.)
Wrong. They are not canon.
Wrong. (Hint: arrange the words "Whittaker" and "Jodie" into the
correct order.)
Whittaker is not canon.
Post by solar penguin
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
Four mistakes in seven words. Are you trying to challenge Yads for the
record?
There were no mistakes except cannon.
Wrong.
Wrong.
Post by solar penguin
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
What would happen if your own grandfather had a sex change operation
here on Earth? You'd ask her if she still wanted to be called
"grandfather" or whether she preferred to be "grandmother" now, and
you'd respect her wishes. Problem solved. Simple as that.
That ain't going to happen.
Well, duh! That's the whole point of a "What if" scenario. It's not
a "What will happen" scenario.
Your "what if" scenario is based on a false premise. It can never
happen, unless you intend traveling back in time and changing history,
which is also impossible.
Post by solar penguin
Post by Agamemnon
The Time Lords should have evolved a specific genderless terminology.
They have not, therefore, Time Lords changing Gender, is not canon.
We have sex change facilities, but still use gendered terminology.
We do not have sex change facilities. Sex is determined by your DNA.
Chopping off your cock and balls does not make you female.
Timothy Bruening
2018-07-02 02:09:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod over our rights and lives?
Agamemnon
2018-07-02 02:31:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod over our rights and lives?
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
Timothy Bruening
2018-07-02 03:00:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod over our rights and lives?
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
I was imagining a goose as CEO of Exxon, trying to convince us that global warming is fake news!
Agamemnon
2018-07-02 03:13:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod over our rights and lives?
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
I was imagining a goose as CEO of Exxon, trying to convince us that global warming is fake news!
So I type "Gendar" and it puts "Gander" at the top and "Gender" second,
and I select the top one by instinct. Why can't it see the second letter
I typed was "e" and prioritize the choices that way? It needs and AI.
The Doctor
2018-07-02 04:10:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod
over our rights and lives?
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
I was imagining a goose as CEO of Exxon, trying to convince us that
global warming is fake news!
So I type "Gendar" and it puts "Gander" at the top and "Gender" second,
and I select the top one by instinct. Why can't it see the second letter
I typed was "e" and prioritize the choices that way? It needs and AI.
OR intelligence.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
The Doctor
2018-07-02 04:08:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod
over our rights and lives?
Post by Agamemnon
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
I was imagining a goose as CEO of Exxon, trying to convince us that
global warming is fake news!
Quit hnkin Goose Tim Bruening.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Timothy Bruening
2018-07-02 13:27:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod
over our rights and lives?
Post by Agamemnon
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
I was imagining a goose as CEO of Exxon, trying to convince us that
global warming is fake news!
Quit hnkin Goose Tim Bruening.
What does "hnkin" mean?
The Doctor
2018-07-02 20:57:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod
over our rights and lives?
Post by Agamemnon
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
I was imagining a goose as CEO of Exxon, trying to convince us that
global warming is fake news!
Quit hnkin Goose Tim Bruening.
What does "hnkin" mean?
s/hnkin/honking/g
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Timothy Bruening
2018-07-02 03:03:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod over our rights and lives?
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
So your spell check didn't suggest "Gender"?
Agamemnon
2018-07-02 03:14:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod over our rights and lives?
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
So your spell check didn't suggest "Gender"?
So I type "Gendar" and it puts "Gander" at the top and "Gender" second,
and I select the top one by instinct. Why can't it see the second letter
I typed was "e" and prioritize the choices that way? It needs an AI.
Timothy Bruening
2018-07-02 05:50:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod over our rights and lives?
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
So your spell check didn't suggest "Gender"?
So I type "Gendar" and it puts "Gander" at the top and "Gender" second,
and I select the top one by instinct. Why can't it see the second letter
I typed was "e" and prioritize the choices that way? It needs an AI.
I surmise that your spellcheck thought you had anagrammed "Gander" into "Gendar". The 2 words have the same letters, just arranged differently!
Agamemnon
2018-07-02 07:33:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod over our rights and lives?
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
So your spell check didn't suggest "Gender"?
So I type "Gendar" and it puts "Gander" at the top and "Gender" second,
and I select the top one by instinct. Why can't it see the second letter
I typed was "e" and prioritize the choices that way? It needs an AI.
I surmise that your spellcheck thought you had anagrammed "Gander" into "Gendar". The 2 words have the same letters, just arranged differently!
Why would I have been talking about geese? I typed "e" second. It should
have worked out I was typing "Gender" and put that first.
The Doctor
2018-07-02 12:14:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod
over our rights and lives?
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
So your spell check didn't suggest "Gender"?
So I type "Gendar" and it puts "Gander" at the top and "Gender" second,
and I select the top one by instinct. Why can't it see the second letter
I typed was "e" and prioritize the choices that way? It needs an AI.
I surmise that your spellcheck thought you had anagrammed "Gander"
into "Gendar". The 2 words have the same letters, just arranged
differently!
Why would I have been talking about geese? I typed "e" second. It should
have worked out I was typing "Gender" and put that first.
Got you!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
The Other Doctor
2018-07-02 17:10:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be
capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod
over our rights and lives?
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
So your spell check didn't suggest "Gender"?
So I type "Gendar" and it puts "Gander" at the top and "Gender" second,
and I select the top one by instinct. Why can't it see the second letter
I typed was "e" and prioritize the choices that way? It needs an AI.
I surmise that your spellcheck thought you had anagrammed "Gander" into
"Gendar". The 2 words have the same letters, just arranged differently!
Why would I have been talking about geese? I typed "e" second. It should
have worked out I was typing "Gender" and put that first.
Much like Yads, many of your posts make no sense to a human reader. Even a
spell checker with some kind of built in intelligence would struggle to
decipher what you meant to write instead of what you actually write.
Idlehands
2018-07-02 18:30:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod
over our rights and lives?
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
So your spell check didn't suggest "Gender"?
So I type "Gendar" and it puts "Gander" at the top and "Gender" second,
and I select the top one by instinct. Why can't it see the second letter
I typed was "e" and prioritize the choices that way? It needs an AI.
I surmise that your spellcheck thought you had anagrammed "Gander" into
"Gendar". The 2 words have the same letters, just arranged differently!
Why would I have been talking about geese? I typed "e" second. It should
have worked out I was typing "Gender" and put that first.
Much like Yads, many of your posts make no sense to a human reader. Even a
spell checker with some kind of built in intelligence would struggle to
decipher what you meant to write instead of what you actually write.
He spell "Gander" perfectly, not sure what he is whining about but much
like the poorly educated with big egos they think computers can fix
everything and can't be bothered to learn the basics themselves.
--
"If the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of a
divine reward then, brother, that person is a piece of shit"
Rustin Cohle
The Doctor
2018-07-02 21:15:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod
over our rights and lives?
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
So your spell check didn't suggest "Gender"?
So I type "Gendar" and it puts "Gander" at the top and "Gender" second,
and I select the top one by instinct. Why can't it see the second letter
I typed was "e" and prioritize the choices that way? It needs an AI.
I surmise that your spellcheck thought you had anagrammed "Gander" into
"Gendar". The 2 words have the same letters, just arranged differently!
Why would I have been talking about geese? I typed "e" second. It should
have worked out I was typing "Gender" and put that first.
Much like Yads, many of your posts make no sense to a human reader. Even a
spell checker with some kind of built in intelligence would struggle to
decipher what you meant to write instead of what you actually write.
Shut up pub drunk Stephen Wilson!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Agamemnon
2018-07-02 22:26:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod
over our rights and lives?
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
So your spell check didn't suggest "Gender"?
So I type "Gendar" and it puts "Gander" at the top and "Gender" second,
and I select the top one by instinct. Why can't it see the second letter
I typed was "e" and prioritize the choices that way? It needs an AI.
I surmise that your spellcheck thought you had anagrammed "Gander" into
"Gendar". The 2 words have the same letters, just arranged differently!
Why would I have been talking about geese? I typed "e" second. It should
have worked out I was typing "Gender" and put that first.
Much like Yads, many of your posts make no sense to a human reader. Even a
spell checker with some kind of built in intelligence would struggle to
decipher what you meant to write instead of what you actually write.
It's not that difficult to code a spellchecker so that it lists
suggestions based on the order of the letters which you type, if it does
not suspect juxtaposition. You clearly lack comprehension skills.
The Doctor
2018-07-02 12:08:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod
over our rights and lives?
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
So your spell check didn't suggest "Gender"?
So I type "Gendar" and it puts "Gander" at the top and "Gender" second,
and I select the top one by instinct. Why can't it see the second letter
I typed was "e" and prioritize the choices that way? It needs an AI.
I surmise that your spellcheck thought you had anagrammed "Gander" into
"Gendar". The 2 words have the same letters, just arranged differently!
I see your point.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
The Doctor
2018-07-02 04:09:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod
over our rights and lives?
Post by Agamemnon
Bloody spell checker again. It needs an AI to suggest proper corrections
based on what I'm typing instead of putting similar looking words at the
top of the list. The way things are going I'm might have to write the
bloody thing myself given that Thunderbird is supposed to be open source.
So your spell check didn't suggest "Gender"?
Doing a Daniel I see.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
The Doctor
2018-07-02 04:07:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod over our rights and lives?
What?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Timothy Bruening
2018-07-02 06:00:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod over
our rights and lives?
What?
Gander = male geese, and Aggy typed of Ganders being capitalistic.
The Doctor
2018-07-02 12:10:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod over
our rights and lives?
What?
Gander = male geese, and Aggy typed of Ganders being capitalistic.
s/geese/guys/g
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Timothy Bruening
2018-07-02 13:43:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod over
our rights and lives?
What?
Gander = male geese, and Aggy typed of Ganders being capitalistic.
s/geese/guys/g
I intended to type "geese"!
The Doctor
2018-07-02 20:59:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Why should male geese support large corporations running roughshod over
our rights and lives?
What?
Gander = male geese, and Aggy typed of Ganders being capitalistic.
s/geese/guys/g
I intended to type "geese"!
Honk!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
The Doctor
2018-07-02 04:02:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
Repost, since the original doesn't seem to be showing up. My apologies
if anyone sees this twice.
On Sunday, 1 July 2018 19:48:11 UTC+1, Aggy arrogantly asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Time Lords changing Gender is not cannon
1. It should be "are" not "is" (since Time Lords are plural, even when
they're changing gender.)
The clause being referred to by "is" is "Time Lords Changing Gender"
therefore it is "is", as in Jo and Katya is the winning couple on Strictly.
Post by solar penguin
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
Gander is part of the main clause therefore it should be capitalistic as
Jo and Katya is.
Post by solar penguin
3. It should be "canon" not "cannon" (since you probably didn't mean to
say that they're not a device for firing projectiles.)
Whatever.
Post by solar penguin
4. The word "not" shouldn't be there (since Time Lords changing gender
are canon.)
Wrong. They are not canon.
Post by solar penguin
Four mistakes in seven words. Are you trying to challenge Yads for the
record?
There were no mistakes except cannon.
Post by solar penguin
Post by Agamemnon
it's sexist, misandiristic, LGBT bollocks inflicted on the new series
by Chibnall and Moffat; since Susan calls the Doctor, "grandfather",
and the Doctor calls her his "granddaughter", not "grandparent" or
"grandchild".
What would happen if your own grandfather had a sex change operation
here on Earth? You'd ask her if she still wanted to be called
"grandfather" or whether she preferred to be "grandmother" now, and
you'd respect her wishes. Problem solved. Simple as that.
That ain't going to happen.
Post by solar penguin
If we mere humans can deal with it, then so can the Time Lords.
They are smarter than us, after all.
The Time Lords should have evolved a specific genderless terminology.
They have not, therefore, Time Lords changing Gender, is not canon.
AGA 3 SP 0
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
The Doctor
2018-07-02 04:00:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by solar penguin
Repost, since the original doesn't seem to be showing up. My apologies
if anyone sees this twice.
On Sunday, 1 July 2018 19:48:11 UTC+1, Aggy arrogantly asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Time Lords changing Gender is not cannon
1. It should be "are" not "is" (since Time Lords are plural, even when
they're changing gender.)
2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)
3. It should be "canon" not "cannon" (since you probably didn't mean to
say that they're not a device for firing projectiles.)
4. The word "not" shouldn't be there (since Time Lords changing gender
are canon.)
Four mistakes in seven words. Are you trying to challenge Yads for the
record?
Post by Agamemnon
it's sexist, misandiristic, LGBT bollocks inflicted on the new series
by Chibnall and Moffat; since Susan calls the Doctor, "grandfather",
and the Doctor calls her his "granddaughter", not "grandparent" or
"grandchild".
What would happen if your own grandfather had a sex change operation
here on Earth? You'd ask her if she still wanted to be called
"grandfather" or whether she preferred to be "grandmother" now, and
you'd respect her wishes. Problem solved. Simple as that.
If we mere humans can deal with it, then so can the Time Lords.
They are smarter than us, after all.
Bollocks meat!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
solar penguin
2018-07-01 19:55:07 UTC
Permalink
Aggy arrogantly asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Time Lords changing Gender is not cannon
1. It should be "are" not "is" (since Time Lords are plural, even when
they're changing gender.)

2. "Gender" should not have a capital letter (since it's not a proper
noun, even when Time Lords are changing it.)

3. It should be "canon" not "cannon" (since you probably didn't mean to
say that they're not a device for firing projectiles.)

4. The word "not" shouldn't be there (since Time Lords changing gender
are canon.)

Four mistakes in seven words. Are you trying to challenge Yads for the
record?
Post by Agamemnon
it's sexist, misandiristic, LGBT bollocks inflicted on the new series
by Chibnall and Moffat; since Susan calls the Doctor, "grandfather",
and the Doctor calls her his "granddaughter", not "grandparent" or
"grandchild".
What would happen if your own grandfather had a sex change operation
here on Earth? You'd ask her if she still wanted to be called
"grandfather" or whether she preferred to be "grandmother" now, and
you'd respect her wishes. Problem solved. Simple as that.

If we mere humans can deal with it, then so can the Time Lords.
They are smarter than us, after all.
Daniel60
2018-07-02 12:22:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Daniel60
In article
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously
Chibnall can't do it now because giving a female Doctor a
wife or even former wife is totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives
or even former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
Unfortunately!
... but they've partnered them for ages!!
Good to see that Dave thinks it’s unfortunate that it’s taken so long
for women to be able to marry each other. First Liberal thing he’s
ever said!
Ah!! So that's how you "read" the idiot's "Unfortunately!", Stephen!! I
didn't.
--
Daniel
The Last Doctor
2018-07-02 18:30:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daniel60
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Daniel60
In article
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously
Chibnall can't do it now because giving a female Doctor a
wife or even former wife is totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives
or even former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
Unfortunately!
... but they've partnered them for ages!!
Good to see that Dave thinks it’s unfortunate that it’s taken so long
for women to be able to marry each other. First Liberal thing he’s
ever said!
Ah!! So that's how you "read" the idiot's "Unfortunately!", Stephen!! I
didn't.
Mike, and nor did I really.
--
There are some corners of the universe which have bred the most terrible
things. Things which act against everything we believe in. They must be
fought.
Agamemnon
2018-07-01 18:30:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daniel60
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Why?  Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or even
former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
Unfortunately!
... but they've partnered them for ages!!
We do not want to see this on Doctor Who, unless it's lesbian porn
between two attractive women; in which case it will not be suitable for
children, so homosexuality has no place in Doctor Who whatsoever.
The Doctor
2018-07-01 19:28:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Daniel60
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Why?  Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or even
former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
Unfortunately!
... but they've partnered them for ages!!
We do not want to see this on Doctor Who, unless it's lesbian porn
between two attractive women; in which case it will not be suitable for
children, so homosexuality has no place in Doctor Who whatsoever.
100/10 !
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Daniel60
2018-07-02 12:18:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Daniel60
In article
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously
Chibnall can't do it now because giving a female Doctor a
wife or even former wife is totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives
or even former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
Unfortunately!
... but they've partnered them for ages!!
We do not want to see this on Doctor Who, unless it's lesbian porn
between two attractive women; in which case it will not be suitable
for children, so homosexuality has no place in Doctor Who
whatsoever.
Strange how you, Aggy, would, sort of, maybe, kind of, accept two women
going at it on Doctor Who, but would not accept to men going at it!!

Is there something you want to tell us, Aggy?? :-)
--
Daniel
The Doctor
2018-07-02 21:18:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daniel60
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Daniel60
In article
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously
Chibnall can't do it now because giving a female Doctor a
wife or even former wife is totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives
or even former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
Unfortunately!
... but they've partnered them for ages!!
We do not want to see this on Doctor Who, unless it's lesbian porn
between two attractive women; in which case it will not be suitable
for children, so homosexuality has no place in Doctor Who
whatsoever.
Strange how you, Aggy, would, sort of, maybe, kind of, accept two women
going at it on Doctor Who, but would not accept to men going at it!!
Is there something you want to tell us, Aggy?? :-)
--
Daniel
Egads!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Agamemnon
2018-07-02 22:22:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daniel60
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Daniel60
In article
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously
Chibnall can't do it now because giving a female Doctor a
wife or even former wife is totally ridiculous.
Why?  Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives
or even former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
Unfortunately!
... but they've partnered them for ages!!
We do not want to see this on Doctor Who, unless it's lesbian porn
between two attractive women; in which case it will not be suitable
for children, so homosexuality has no place in Doctor Who
whatsoever.
Strange how you, Aggy, would, sort of, maybe, kind of, accept two women
going at it on Doctor Who, but would not accept to men going at it!!
Is there something you want to tell us, Aggy?? :-)
Just how deranged are you? Are you gay or something? Men who are not gay
do not wish to watch two men going at it, or programms featuring gay
male relationships. If that is what arouses you then you are in a tiny
minority. Stop trying to inflict your fantasies on the majority. Lesbian
porn is fine, but not lesbian relationships. A relationship, like holy
marriage, is between a man and a woman.
The Other Doctor
2018-07-02 22:41:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Daniel60
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Daniel60
In article
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously
Chibnall can't do it now because giving a female Doctor a
wife or even former wife is totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives
or even former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
Unfortunately!
... but they've partnered them for ages!!
We do not want to see this on Doctor Who, unless it's lesbian porn
between two attractive women; in which case it will not be suitable
for children, so homosexuality has no place in Doctor Who
whatsoever.
Strange how you, Aggy, would, sort of, maybe, kind of, accept two women
going at it on Doctor Who, but would not accept to men going at it!!
Is there something you want to tell us, Aggy?? :-)
Just how deranged are you? Are you gay or something? Men who are not gay
do not wish to watch two men going at it, or programms featuring gay male
relationships. If that is what arouses you then you are in a tiny
minority. Stop trying to inflict your fantasies on the majority. Lesbian
porn is fine, but not lesbian relationships. A relationship, like holy
marriage, is between a man and a woman.
Wrong, wrong, and wrong. Oh, and wrong.

Doctor Who has never shown any form of sex for a start. Only in your tiny
little mind.

"Programms" - ah - that will be your dodgy spellcheker that always turns the
words you typed correctly into incorrect words. Now you clearly find the
idea of gay relationships a problem. I'm a heterosexual male. I'm
comfortable with my sexuality. Being with gay men does not worry me.
Watching a show featuring gay men does not worry me. It worries you though.
I wonder why? Could it be that you're simply not confortable with your own
sexuality?

Doctor Who has never shown any form of porn. Why did you even bring up the
idea? Is that the only way you get your sexual kicks - masturbating whilst
watching porn?

A relationship only happens between a man and a woman? If that was true, I
pity you. Have you ever had a relationship with anyone? Doesn't sound like
it. A relationship is what forms when 2 (or more) people are connected in
some way. And that's it. You must be a lonely man.

And as for Holy marriage... Marriage is not something that was invented by
any god. It was invented by humans. Marriage is a union between 2 people.
You want it to be between a man and a woman? Tough. The world doesn't always
do what you want.
Agamemnon
2018-07-02 23:10:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Daniel60
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Daniel60
In article
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously
Chibnall can't do it now because giving a female Doctor a
wife or even former wife is totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives
or even former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
Unfortunately!
... but they've partnered them for ages!!
We do not want to see this on Doctor Who, unless it's lesbian porn
between two attractive women; in which case it will not be suitable
for children, so homosexuality has no place in Doctor Who
whatsoever.
Strange how you, Aggy, would, sort of, maybe, kind of, accept two women
going at it on Doctor Who, but would not accept to men going at it!!
Is there something you want to tell us, Aggy?? :-)
Just how deranged are you? Are you gay or something? Men who are not gay
do not wish to watch two men going at it, or programms featuring gay male
relationships. If that is what arouses you then you are in a tiny
minority. Stop trying to inflict your fantasies on the majority. Lesbian
porn is fine, but not lesbian relationships. A relationship, like holy
marriage, is between a man and a woman.
Wrong, wrong, and wrong. Oh, and wrong.
Are you as deranged as he is?
Post by The Other Doctor
Doctor Who has never shown any form of sex for a start. Only in your tiny
little mind.
It showed John Barrowman's bare arse, and then Matt Smiths bare arse.
Why was this homoerotic porn shown on a show watched by children? Why
was it show at all? Why didn't the viewer get to see Billy Piper's and
Jenna Coleman's bare arses?
Post by The Other Doctor
"Programms" - ah - that will be your dodgy spellcheker that always turns the
words you typed correctly into incorrect words. Now you clearly find the
idea of gay relationships a problem.
Of course it is. The vast majority of viewers are heterosexual.
Post by The Other Doctor
I'm a heterosexual male. I'm
You could have fooled me and everyone else here.
Post by The Other Doctor
comfortable with my sexuality. Being with gay men does not worry me.
Watching a show featuring gay men does not worry me. It worries you though.
I wonder why? Could it be that you're simply not confortable with your own
sexuality?
The standard SJW homosexual pseudo psychological bollocks repeated ad
nausium, which has no basis in real science whatsoever.

I don't want my privacy invade by gay brainwashing and propaganda,
especially before the watershed.
Post by The Other Doctor
Doctor Who has never shown any form of porn. Why did you even bring up the
Doctor Who and it's audience have been hijacked by a bunch of gay and
SJW propagandists, and held hostage. People are sick and tired of this
and have stopped watching. If these perverts want to make a show
featuring homosexuals, then why don't they create a new one, and give
people the choice of not to watch?
Post by The Other Doctor
idea? Is that the only way you get your sexual kicks - masturbating whilst
watching porn?
You are a sick pervert.
Post by The Other Doctor
A relationship only happens between a man and a woman? If that was true, I
That is true. If it's between a man and a man, or a woman and a woman
then it's called friendship. That is what Plato's Symposium is clear in
distinguishing in the original Greek, but even that has been hijacked by
a bunch of gay propagandists.
Post by The Other Doctor
pity you. Have you ever had a relationship with anyone? Doesn't sound like
it. A relationship is what forms when 2 (or more) people are connected in
some way. And that's it. You must be a lonely man.
A relationship is between a man and woman, fool! You don't have
relationships with your pets or people of the same sex. You can stop
trolling now.
Post by The Other Doctor
And as for Holy marriage... Marriage is not something that was invented by
any god.
Where did I mention any gods?
Post by The Other Doctor
It was invented by humans. Marriage is a union between 2 people.
Of the opposite sex, for the purpose of producing legitimate natural
born children. That was why humans devised it.
Post by The Other Doctor
You want it to be between a man and a woman? Tough. The world doesn't always
do what you want.
Marriage is not there so that homosexuals can feel they are a part of it.

And homosexuality has no place in a family TV show. Why do you think The
Eaters of Light was the lowest rating episode in Doctor Who history? Why
do you think Dickensian flopped? Why do you think that the ratings of
Troy: Fall of a City halved overnight? Why do you think hardly anyone
watched Class?

Heterosexuals to not want to watch shows featuring homosexual
relationships. They want to watch shows with characters that they can
identify with or find attractive.

This racist and sexist SJW and PC lunacy is totally destroying
television drama.
Timothy Bruening
2018-07-02 23:45:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Daniel60
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Daniel60
In article
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously
Chibnall can't do it now because giving a female Doctor a
wife or even former wife is totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives
or even former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
Unfortunately!
... but they've partnered them for ages!!
We do not want to see this on Doctor Who, unless it's lesbian porn
between two attractive women; in which case it will not be suitable
for children, so homosexuality has no place in Doctor Who
whatsoever.
Strange how you, Aggy, would, sort of, maybe, kind of, accept two women
going at it on Doctor Who, but would not accept to men going at it!!
Is there something you want to tell us, Aggy?? :-)
Just how deranged are you? Are you gay or something? Men who are not gay
do not wish to watch two men going at it, or programms featuring gay male
relationships. If that is what arouses you then you are in a tiny
minority. Stop trying to inflict your fantasies on the majority. Lesbian
porn is fine, but not lesbian relationships. A relationship, like holy
marriage, is between a man and a woman.
Wrong, wrong, and wrong. Oh, and wrong.
Doctor Who has never shown any form of sex for a start. Only in your tiny
little mind.
"Programms" - ah - that will be your dodgy spellcheker that always turns the
words you typed correctly into incorrect words. Now you clearly find the
idea of gay relationships a problem. I'm a heterosexual male. I'm
comfortable with my sexuality. Being with gay men does not worry me.
Watching a show featuring gay men does not worry me. It worries you though.
I wonder why? Could it be that you're simply not confortable with your own
sexuality?
Doctor Who has never shown any form of porn. Why did you even bring up the
idea? Is that the only way you get your sexual kicks - masturbating whilst
watching porn?
A relationship only happens between a man and a woman? If that was true, I
pity you. Have you ever had a relationship with anyone? Doesn't sound like
it. A relationship is what forms when 2 (or more) people are connected in
some way. And that's it. You must be a lonely man.
And as for Holy marriage... Marriage is not something that was invented by
any god. It was invented by humans. Marriage is a union between 2 people.
Some cultures have permitted polygamy.
The Doctor
2018-07-03 00:32:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Daniel60
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Daniel60
In article
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously
Chibnall can't do it now because giving a female Doctor a
wife or even former wife is totally ridiculous.
Why?  Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives
or even former wives.
Only recently have women been allowed to marry women.
Unfortunately!
... but they've partnered them for ages!!
We do not want to see this on Doctor Who, unless it's lesbian porn
between two attractive women; in which case it will not be suitable
for children, so homosexuality has no place in Doctor Who
whatsoever.
Strange how you, Aggy, would, sort of, maybe, kind of, accept two women
going at it on Doctor Who, but would not accept to men going at it!!
Is there something you want to tell us, Aggy?? :-)
Just how deranged are you? Are you gay or something? Men who are not gay
do not wish to watch two men going at it, or programms featuring gay
male relationships. If that is what arouses you then you are in a tiny
minority. Stop trying to inflict your fantasies on the majority. Lesbian
porn is fine, but not lesbian relationships. A relationship, like holy
marriage, is between a man and a woman.
These nutcases!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly. -Thomas Paine
Timothy Bruening
2018-06-30 11:34:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or even
former wives.
Plot bunnies: Leela's husband Andred regenerates as a woman, shocking the living daylights out of her.

Ditto for a male Susan and David!
Agamemnon
2018-06-30 12:17:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or even
former wives.
Plot bunnies: Leela's husband Andred regenerates as a woman, shocking the living daylights out of her.
Ditto for a male Susan and David!
Almost forgot about Susan and David.

Clearly this Time Lords changing sex business is complete and utter SJW
transvestite and female chauvinistic bollocks.

You can't have a love interest with someone who changes sex. The ratings
are have already been flushed down the toilet before even a single new
episode has been shown.
The Doctor
2018-06-30 13:54:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or even
former wives.
Plot bunnies: Leela's husband Andred regenerates as a woman, shocking
the living daylights out of her.
Post by Timothy Bruening
Ditto for a male Susan and David!
Almost forgot about Susan and David.
Clearly this Time Lords changing sex business is complete and utter SJW
transvestite and female chauvinistic bollocks.
You can't have a love interest with someone who changes sex. The ratings
are have already been flushed down the toilet before even a single new
episode has been shown.
Exactly!!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Daniel60
2018-07-01 12:54:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
On Saturday, June 30, 2018 at 3:51:07 AM UTC-7, solar penguin
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously
Chibnall can't do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife
or even former wife is totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or
even former wives.
Plot bunnies: Leela's husband Andred regenerates as a woman,
shocking the living daylights out of her.
Ditto for a male Susan and David!
Almost forgot about Susan and David.
Clearly this Time Lords changing sex business is complete and utter
SJW transvestite and female chauvinistic bollocks.
You can't have a love interest with someone who changes sex.
Aggy, if you have a partner (i.e. Love interest), do you love just the
physical body of your partner, or do you love everything about your
partner (their appearance, their sense of humour, their speech, their
knowledge, their .........)??

If the second, and they lost one or other of those attributes, would you
stop loving them??
--
Daniel
Agamemnon
2018-07-01 18:27:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daniel60
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously
Chibnall can't do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife
or even former wife is totally ridiculous.
Why?  Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or
even former wives.
Plot bunnies: Leela's husband Andred regenerates as a woman,
shocking the living daylights out of her.
Ditto for a male Susan and David!
Almost forgot about Susan and David.
Clearly this Time Lords changing sex business is complete and utter
SJW transvestite and female chauvinistic bollocks.
You can't have a love interest with someone who changes sex.
Aggy, if you have a partner (i.e. Love interest), do you love just the
physical body of your partner, or do you love everything about your
partner (their appearance, their sense of humour, their speech, their
knowledge, their .........)??
If the second, and they lost one or other of those attributes, would you
stop loving them??
That's not the same as them being a man. I do not have romantic
inclinations towards men. Jodie Whittaker as far as I'm concerned is a
man, therefore there is no love interest in her for me. I remember how I
felt when Captain Kirk was turned into a woman when I saw that episode
for the first time and I didn't like it, and that is going to be the
same reaction when people see the Doctor being played by a woman. She
will not be perceived as the Doctor, especially since she's a talentless
actress, that can't even control her accent or her hysterics. Doctor Who
is heading for oblivion. The best thing Chibnall and Whittaker can do is
resign immediately, before the first episode is even shown, so that
Doctor Who can be saved!
The Doctor
2018-07-01 19:28:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Daniel60
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously
Chibnall can't do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife
or even former wife is totally ridiculous.
Why?  Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or
even former wives.
Plot bunnies: Leela's husband Andred regenerates as a woman,
shocking the living daylights out of her.
Ditto for a male Susan and David!
Almost forgot about Susan and David.
Clearly this Time Lords changing sex business is complete and utter
SJW transvestite and female chauvinistic bollocks.
You can't have a love interest with someone who changes sex.
Aggy, if you have a partner (i.e. Love interest), do you love just the
physical body of your partner, or do you love everything about your
partner (their appearance, their sense of humour, their speech, their
knowledge, their .........)??
If the second, and they lost one or other of those attributes, would you
stop loving them??
That's not the same as them being a man. I do not have romantic
inclinations towards men. Jodie Whittaker as far as I'm concerned is a
man, therefore there is no love interest in her for me. I remember how I
felt when Captain Kirk was turned into a woman when I saw that episode
for the first time and I didn't like it, and that is going to be the
same reaction when people see the Doctor being played by a woman. She
will not be perceived as the Doctor, especially since she's a talentless
actress, that can't even control her accent or her hysterics. Doctor Who
is heading for oblivion. The best thing Chibnall and Whittaker can do is
resign immediately, before the first episode is even shown, so that
Doctor Who can be saved!
Great one AGA!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Idlehands
2018-07-01 22:56:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Daniel60
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously
Chibnall can't do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife
or even former wife is totally ridiculous.
Why?  Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or
even former wives.
Plot bunnies: Leela's husband Andred regenerates as a woman,
shocking the living daylights out of her.
Ditto for a male Susan and David!
Almost forgot about Susan and David.
Clearly this Time Lords changing sex business is complete and utter
SJW transvestite and female chauvinistic bollocks.
You can't have a love interest with someone who changes sex.
Aggy, if you have a partner (i.e. Love interest), do you love just the
physical body of your partner, or do you love everything about your
partner (their appearance, their sense of humour, their speech, their
knowledge, their .........)??
If the second, and they lost one or other of those attributes, would
you stop loving them??
That's not the same as them being a man. I do not have romantic
inclinations towards men. Jodie Whittaker as far as I'm concerned is a
man, therefore there is no love interest in her for me. I remember how I
felt when Captain Kirk was turned into a woman when I saw that episode
for the first time and I didn't like it, and that is going to be the
same reaction when people see the Doctor being played by a woman. She
will not be perceived as the Doctor, especially since she's a talentless
actress, that can't even control her accent or her hysterics. Doctor Who
is heading for oblivion. The best thing Chibnall and Whittaker can do is
resign immediately, before the first episode is even shown, so that
Doctor Who can be saved!
You failed to answer the question and then covered that failure in a
soup of red herrings.

I suspect, Daniel, Aggy has never had any kind of love interest (other
than something inflatable) which explains his bitterness and outright
hostility displayed against women.
--
"If the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of a
divine reward then, brother, that person is a piece of shit"
Rustin Cohle
The Doctor
2018-06-30 13:49:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or even
former wives.
Plot bunnies: Leela's husband Andred regenerates as a woman, shocking
the living daylights out of her.
Ditto for a male Susan and David!
Extremely terrible!!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Agamemnon
2018-06-30 12:02:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or even
former wives.
The primary audience for Doctor Who is not married or divorced lesbians.

As seen with Dickensian, Troy: Fall of a City, and Solo: A Star Wars
Story; introducing gay relationships will cause Doctor Who to completely
flop.
The Doctor
2018-06-30 13:53:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or even
former wives.
The primary audience for Doctor Who is not married or divorced lesbians.
As seen with Dickensian, Troy: Fall of a City, and Solo: A Star Wars
Story; introducing gay relationships will cause Doctor Who to completely
flop.
Hear!! Hear!!!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
The Doctor
2018-06-30 13:47:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by solar penguin
Aggy asininely asserted...
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Why? Even in the real world, female Doctors can have wives or even
former wives.
Sick PEnguin!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Timothy Bruening
2018-06-30 11:29:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!

Unless polygamy is legal on Gallifrey!
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the Doctor left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never revealed that fact for fear of offending his Companions.

Maybe the Master was the Doctor's wife in a previous Missy incarnation! That would explain her attraction to him & his desire to reform her!

Bunny: The Doctor's wife shows up and slaps her for turning female.
Agamemnon
2018-06-30 12:11:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
Post by Timothy Bruening
Unless polygamy is legal on Gallifrey!
Leela wouldn't be very happy with that. What happened to her offspring
with Andred?
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the Doctor left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never revealed that fact for fear of offending his Companions.
Why would he take Susan his grand daughter with him then?
Post by Timothy Bruening
Maybe the Master was the Doctor's wife in a previous Missy incarnation! That would explain her attraction to him & his desire to reform her!
If that is so, why doesn't he talk about it to it?
Post by Timothy Bruening
Bunny: The Doctor's wife shows up and slaps her for turning female.
Chibnall has still got to address that issue of homosexuality, and
that's why the ratings for the new series have already gone down the
toilet before a single new episode has been shown.
Timothy Bruening
2018-06-30 12:48:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
Doctor 10 agreed to marry Queen Elizabeth I in 1562. I assume THAT wedding would have been legal!
The Doctor
2018-06-30 13:55:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
Post by Agamemnon
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
Doctor 10 agreed to marry Queen Elizabeth I in 1562. I assume THAT
wedding would have been legal!
Yes.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Agamemnon
2018-06-30 20:59:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
Doctor 10 agreed to marry Queen Elizabeth I in 1562. I assume THAT wedding would have been legal!
There's no record of it in history.
The Doctor
2018-06-30 22:04:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
Doctor 10 agreed to marry Queen Elizabeth I in 1562. I assume THAT
wedding would have been legal!
There's no record of it in history.
Hidden in the annals of history.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Agamemnon
2018-06-30 22:18:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
Doctor 10 agreed to marry Queen Elizabeth I in 1562. I assume THAT
wedding would have been legal!
There's no record of it in history.
Hidden in the annals of history.
It's not hidden anywhere. It doesn't exist and never existed.
The Doctor
2018-06-30 23:14:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
Doctor 10 agreed to marry Queen Elizabeth I in 1562. I assume THAT
wedding would have been legal!
There's no record of it in history.
Hidden in the annals of history.
It's not hidden anywhere. It doesn't exist and never existed.
I know :-)
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Timothy Bruening
2018-06-30 13:01:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
The Doctor was inside the Telsectra controlling it, so he WAS present at the wedding!
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the Doctor left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never revealed that fact for fear of offending his Companions.
Why would he take Susan his grand daughter with him then?
Okay, make it an ex-wife the Doctor is escaping the memory of. Even a divorced Doctor could dote on his granddaughter enough to take her with him!
The Doctor
2018-06-30 13:56:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
Post by Agamemnon
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
The Doctor was inside the Telsectra controlling it, so he WAS present at the wedding!
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the
Doctor left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never
revealed that fact for fear of offending his Companions.
Post by Agamemnon
Why would he take Susan his grand daughter with him then?
Okay, make it an ex-wife the Doctor is escaping the memory of. Even a
divorced Doctor could dote on his granddaughter enough to take her with
him!
Nice to see you gravitating towards AGA and me!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
roach
2018-06-30 21:10:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
Post by Agamemnon
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
The Doctor was inside the Telsectra controlling it, so he WAS present at the wedding!
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the
Doctor left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never
revealed that fact for fear of offending his Companions.
Post by Agamemnon
Why would he take Susan his grand daughter with him then?
Okay, make it an ex-wife the Doctor is escaping the memory of. Even a
divorced Doctor could dote on his granddaughter enough to take her with
him!
Nice to see you gravitating towards AGA and me!
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
AGA: i thought you looked familiar... :)

damn, i must be so stupid, this is such a waste. :-(((

for me.

oh well. :-(((

i'm a sucker for love. :-((( (ps :)? coincidence, but not untrue! :))
Tim Bruening
2018-06-30 21:27:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by roach
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
Post by Agamemnon
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
The Doctor was inside the Telsectra controlling it, so he WAS present at the wedding!
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the
Doctor left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never
revealed that fact for fear of offending his Companions.
Post by Agamemnon
Why would he take Susan his grand daughter with him then?
Okay, make it an ex-wife the Doctor is escaping the memory of. Even a
divorced Doctor could dote on his granddaughter enough to take her with
him!
Nice to see you gravitating towards AGA and me!
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
AGA: i thought you looked familiar... :)
damn, i must be so stupid, this is such a waste. :-(((
for me.
oh well. :-(((
i'm a sucker for love. :-((( (ps :)? coincidence, but not untrue! :))
You want to date AGA?
roach
2018-06-30 23:27:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by roach
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
Post by Agamemnon
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
The Doctor was inside the Telsectra controlling it, so he WAS present at
the wedding!
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the
Doctor left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never
revealed that fact for fear of offending his Companions.
Post by Agamemnon
Why would he take Susan his grand daughter with him then?
Okay, make it an ex-wife the Doctor is escaping the memory of. Even a
divorced Doctor could dote on his granddaughter enough to take her with
him!
Nice to see you gravitating towards AGA and me!
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
AGA: i thought you looked familiar... :)
damn, i must be so stupid, this is such a waste. :-(((
for me.
oh well. :-(((
i'm a sucker for love. :-((( (ps :)? coincidence, but not untrue! :))
You want to date AGA?
no, i'd rather date jermaine (lol) (jk!:))

well, in any case, none of this is UP to me!
Timothy Bruening
2018-07-01 03:49:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by roach
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by roach
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
Post by Agamemnon
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
The Doctor was inside the Telsectra controlling it, so he WAS present at
the wedding!
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the
Doctor left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never
revealed that fact for fear of offending his Companions.
Post by Agamemnon
Why would he take Susan his grand daughter with him then?
Okay, make it an ex-wife the Doctor is escaping the memory of. Even a
divorced Doctor could dote on his granddaughter enough to take her with
him!
Nice to see you gravitating towards AGA and me!
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
AGA: i thought you looked familiar... :)
damn, i must be so stupid, this is such a waste. :-(((
for me.
oh well. :-(((
i'm a sucker for love. :-((( (ps :)? coincidence, but not untrue! :))
You want to date AGA?
no, i'd rather date jermaine (lol) (jk!:))
well, in any case, none of this is UP to me!
Can't you decide whom you want to date?
The Doctor
2018-07-01 12:46:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by roach
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by roach
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason
why he left
Post by roach
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by roach
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
Post by Agamemnon
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It
wasn't even to
Post by roach
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by roach
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
The Doctor was inside the Telsectra controlling it, so he WAS
present at
Post by roach
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by roach
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
the wedding!
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously
Chibnall can't
Post by roach
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by roach
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even
former wife is
Post by roach
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by roach
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the
Doctor left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never
revealed that fact for fear of offending his Companions.
Post by Agamemnon
Why would he take Susan his grand daughter with him then?
Okay, make it an ex-wife the Doctor is escaping the memory of. Even a
divorced Doctor could dote on his granddaughter enough to take her with
him!
Nice to see you gravitating towards AGA and me!
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by roach
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by roach
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and
53 on Atheism
Post by roach
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by roach
Post by The Doctor
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
AGA: i thought you looked familiar... :)
damn, i must be so stupid, this is such a waste. :-(((
for me.
oh well. :-(((
i'm a sucker for love. :-((( (ps :)? coincidence, but not untrue! :))
You want to date AGA?
no, i'd rather date jermaine (lol) (jk!:))
well, in any case, none of this is UP to me!
Can't you decide whom you want to date?
Careful Tim! You are stpping into a landmine field.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
roach
2018-07-01 22:32:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by roach
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by roach
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
Post by Agamemnon
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
The Doctor was inside the Telsectra controlling it, so he WAS present at
the wedding!
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the
Doctor left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never
revealed that fact for fear of offending his Companions.
Post by Agamemnon
Why would he take Susan his grand daughter with him then?
Okay, make it an ex-wife the Doctor is escaping the memory of. Even a
divorced Doctor could dote on his granddaughter enough to take her with
him!
Nice to see you gravitating towards AGA and me!
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
AGA: i thought you looked familiar... :)
damn, i must be so stupid, this is such a waste. :-(((
for me.
oh well. :-(((
i'm a sucker for love. :-((( (ps :)? coincidence, but not untrue! :))
You want to date AGA?
no, i'd rather date jermaine (lol) (jk!:))
well, in any case, none of this is UP to me!
Can't you decide whom you want to date?
yes of course, but i have to wait for him to ask, naturally.
Agamemnon
2018-07-01 22:33:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by roach
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by roach
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by roach
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
Post by Agamemnon
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
The Doctor was inside the Telsectra controlling it, so he WAS present at
the wedding!
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the
Doctor left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never
revealed that fact for fear of offending his Companions.
Post by Agamemnon
Why would he take Susan his grand daughter with him then?
Okay, make it an ex-wife the Doctor is escaping the memory of. Even a
divorced Doctor could dote on his granddaughter enough to take her with
him!
Nice to see you gravitating towards AGA and me!
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
AGA: i thought you looked familiar... :)
damn, i must be so stupid, this is such a waste. :-(((
for me.
oh well. :-(((
i'm a sucker for love. :-((( (ps :)? coincidence, but not untrue! :))
You want to date AGA?
no, i'd rather date jermaine (lol) (jk!:))
well, in any case, none of this is UP to me!
Can't you decide whom you want to date?
yes of course, but i have to wait for him to ask, naturally.
I don't date men.
The Doctor
2018-06-30 22:08:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
Post by Agamemnon
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
The Doctor was inside the Telsectra controlling it, so he WAS present at the wedding!
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the
Doctor left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never
revealed that fact for fear of offending his Companions.
Post by Agamemnon
Why would he take Susan his grand daughter with him then?
Okay, make it an ex-wife the Doctor is escaping the memory of. Even a
divorced Doctor could dote on his granddaughter enough to take her with
him!
Nice to see you gravitating towards AGA and me!
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
AGA: i thought you looked familiar... :)
damn, i must be so stupid, this is such a waste. :-(((
for me.
oh well. :-(((
i'm a sucker for love. :-((( (ps :)? coincidence, but not untrue! :))
LAugh Shack humour!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Agamemnon
2018-06-30 21:00:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
The Doctor was inside the Telsectra controlling it, so he WAS present at the wedding!
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the Doctor left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never revealed that fact for fear of offending his Companions.
Why would he take Susan his grand daughter with him then?
Okay, make it an ex-wife the Doctor is escaping the memory of. Even a
A dead ex-wife?

divorced Doctor could dote on his granddaughter enough to take her
with him!
And what about her parents? What happened to them?
The Doctor
2018-06-30 22:05:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
The Doctor was inside the Telsectra controlling it, so he WAS present
at the wedding!
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the
Doctor left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never
revealed that fact for fear of offending his Companions.
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why would he take Susan his grand daughter with him then?
Okay, make it an ex-wife the Doctor is escaping the memory of. Even a
A dead ex-wife?
divorced Doctor could dote on his granddaughter enough to take her
with him!
And what about her parents? What happened to them?
How violent.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Agamemnon
2018-07-01 18:54:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
The Doctor was inside the Telsectra controlling it, so he WAS present
at the wedding!
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the
Doctor left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never
revealed that fact for fear of offending his Companions.
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why would he take Susan his grand daughter with him then?
Okay, make it an ex-wife the Doctor is escaping the memory of. Even a
A dead ex-wife?
divorced Doctor could dote on his granddaughter enough to take her
with him!
And what about her parents? What happened to them?
How violent.
Try this: The Doctor's wife turns into a man so the Doctor decides to
leave her. At the same time Susan's mum or dad decides to change sex, so
she decides to leave them too. Both flee Gallifrey because they've had
enough of transvestism ruining families.
The Doctor
2018-07-01 19:30:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
The Doctor was inside the Telsectra controlling it, so he WAS present
at the wedding!
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the
Doctor left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never
revealed that fact for fear of offending his Companions.
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why would he take Susan his grand daughter with him then?
Okay, make it an ex-wife the Doctor is escaping the memory of. Even a
A dead ex-wife?
divorced Doctor could dote on his granddaughter enough to take her
with him!
And what about her parents? What happened to them?
How violent.
Try this: The Doctor's wife turns into a man so the Doctor decides to
leave her. At the same time Susan's mum or dad decides to change sex, so
she decides to leave them too. Both flee Gallifrey because they've had
enough of transvestism ruining families.
Grand!!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
The Doctor
2018-06-30 13:54:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
His marriage to River Song wasn't technically legal. It wasn't even to
him but to a tessalecter, and the other one was part of an alternate
reality which never occurred.
Post by Timothy Bruening
Unless polygamy is legal on Gallifrey!
Leela wouldn't be very happy with that. What happened to her offspring
with Andred?
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the Doctor
left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never revealed
that fact for fear of offending his Companions.
Why would he take Susan his grand daughter with him then?
Post by Timothy Bruening
Maybe the Master was the Doctor's wife in a previous Missy
incarnation! That would explain her attraction to him & his desire to
reform her!
If that is so, why doesn't he talk about it to it?
Post by Timothy Bruening
Bunny: The Doctor's wife shows up and slaps her for turning female.
Chibnall has still got to address that issue of homosexuality, and
that's why the ratings for the new series have already gone down the
toilet before a single new episode has been shown.
Chibnall will drown in infamy!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
The Doctor
2018-06-30 13:49:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat f*ked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
The fact that the Doctor has felt free to marry various Earth women
would imply that his Gallifreyan wife is RIP!
Or not.
Post by Timothy Bruening
Unless polygamy is legal on Gallifrey!
Post by Agamemnon
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
An ex-wife or estranged wife might work. We could say that the Doctor
left Gallifrey to escape from a bad marriage. He had never revealed
that fact for fear of offending his Companions.
Maybe the Master was the Doctor's wife in a previous Missy incarnation!
That would explain her attraction to him & his desire to reform her!
Bunny: The Doctor's wife shows up and slaps her for turning female.
Might work!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Timothy Bruening
2018-06-30 11:31:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
The ability of Gallifreyans to change gender would force them to legalize same sex marriage.
Timothy Bruening
2018-06-30 11:54:47 UTC
Permalink
On Gallifrey, the people can regenerate and thus live for centuries or millennia. That would make "Until Death Does Us Part" vows totally ridiculous.
The Doctor
2018-06-30 13:53:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
On Gallifrey, the people can regenerate and thus live for centuries or
millennia. That would make "Until Death Does Us Part" vows totally
ridiculous.
There is a limit.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Agamemnon
2018-06-30 12:13:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
The ability of Gallifreyans to change gender would force them to legalize same sex marriage.
Or outlaw marriage altogether, but then there's Leela and Andred, so the
whole idea of Time Lords changing sex is totally preposterous.

The sooner we see Clara waking up and seeing Matt Smith walking out of
the shower the better.
The Doctor
2018-06-30 13:54:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
The ability of Gallifreyans to change gender would force them to
legalize same sex marriage.
Or outlaw marriage altogether, but then there's Leela and Andred, so the
whole idea of Time Lords changing sex is totally preposterous.
The sooner we see Clara waking up and seeing Matt Smith walking out of
the shower the better.
OR correct Bill and The Doctor!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Agamemnon
2018-06-30 21:02:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
The ability of Gallifreyans to change gender would force them to
legalize same sex marriage.
Or outlaw marriage altogether, but then there's Leela and Andred, so the
whole idea of Time Lords changing sex is totally preposterous.
The sooner we see Clara waking up and seeing Matt Smith walking out of
the shower the better.
OR correct Bill and The Doctor!
Capaldi and the lesbian never existed.
The Doctor
2018-06-30 22:06:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
The ability of Gallifreyans to change gender would force them to
legalize same sex marriage.
Or outlaw marriage altogether, but then there's Leela and Andred, so the
whole idea of Time Lords changing sex is totally preposterous.
The sooner we see Clara waking up and seeing Matt Smith walking out of
the shower the better.
OR correct Bill and The Doctor!
Capaldi and the lesbian never existed.
Capaldi and CLara did!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Agamemnon
2018-06-30 22:19:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
The ability of Gallifreyans to change gender would force them to
legalize same sex marriage.
Or outlaw marriage altogether, but then there's Leela and Andred, so the
whole idea of Time Lords changing sex is totally preposterous.
The sooner we see Clara waking up and seeing Matt Smith walking out of
the shower the better.
OR correct Bill and The Doctor!
Capaldi and the lesbian never existed.
Capaldi and CLara did!
It's better than Capaldi were erased from Doctor Who history. After all,
they erased Romana III.
The Doctor
2018-06-30 23:14:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
The ability of Gallifreyans to change gender would force them to
legalize same sex marriage.
Or outlaw marriage altogether, but then there's Leela and Andred, so the
whole idea of Time Lords changing sex is totally preposterous.
The sooner we see Clara waking up and seeing Matt Smith walking out of
the shower the better.
OR correct Bill and The Doctor!
Capaldi and the lesbian never existed.
Capaldi and CLara did!
It's better than Capaldi were erased from Doctor Who history. After all,
they erased Romana III.
No to erasing Romana!!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
The Doctor
2018-06-30 13:49:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
The ability of Gallifreyans to change gender would force them to legalize same sex marriage.
Evil!!!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
Timothy Bruening
2018-06-30 12:52:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Your Qs sound like potential fodder for either Chibnall's episodes, your crowd-funded series, or both!
The Doctor
2018-06-30 13:56:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat fucked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Your Qs sound like potential fodder for either Chibnall's episodes, your
crowd-funded series, or both!
crowd-funding.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
The Doctor
2018-06-30 13:46:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat f*ked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Here we go downhill!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
roach
2018-06-30 21:11:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
What happened to the Doctor's wife? I mean his real wife, Susan's
grandmother? And that begs the question, what about his children?
Until Moffat f*ked everything up, it would have made sense to the
story-line that they were all dead and that was the reason why he left
Gallifrey.
Why hasn't any writer dealt with these issues? Obviously Chibnall can't
do it now because giving a female Doctor a wife or even former wife is
totally ridiculous.
Here we go downhill!
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
By the work one knows the workmen. -Jean De La Fontaine
LARS (and the real girl?)
Loading...