Post by The NOTBCS Guy#4 Penn State was supposed to lose to #3 Iowa, right, especially given that Iowa was (a) the higher seed and (b) the home team? So why is it that when a team loses to a higher ranked team, it drops a few spots in the polls?
because results(in terms of W/L) have to matter than rankings when the ranking is based on such a limited set of data.(as any college football season is, even at the end).
Nobody 'knows' if Iowa is truly 3 and Penn State 4. Honestly, Penn State is probably anywhere from top 5 to top 35.....I'd feel confident saying they are definately one of the top 35 teams in the country, but I don't know if I could be more precise than that. Same for Iowa....I don't really 'know' whether they are 2 or 22.
So that's why you don't 'keep' a team at 4 after a close loss to 3. Because an actual tangible hard result/data point that measures something(a win vs a loss) trumps any sort of fixed idea about "where they were"....
I've explained this to Gibson a number of times as well. If the college football season was 220 games for each team and we truly could tell whether Penn State was actually 4 or 24 or Iowa 3 or 23 for example, your idea may make some sense. But if you do it your way now, your passing on an actual result due to reinforcing a rating system that doesn't have enough data to be anywhere close to accurate.