Joyce Melton
2004-02-28 07:28:32 UTC
Here's the part of the CA Constitution I think the countersuit about
marriages in SF should be brought under:
SECTION 1. All people are by nature free and independent and have
inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and
liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing
and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.
With an inalienable right to privacy, what business does the state
have asking you what sex you are?
Exactly this part of the CA constitution was used in part by the
conservatives to overturn various racial balancing shemes, which may
or may not have been a good thing. :)
BTW, since my SO and I are registered civil partners, we have to get a
dissoulution of that before we could get married if getting married
were legal.
Here's a question though: Does George Bush Believe Your Child Has the
Right to Marry for Love?
- Erin
marriages in SF should be brought under:
SECTION 1. All people are by nature free and independent and have
inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and
liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing
and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.
With an inalienable right to privacy, what business does the state
have asking you what sex you are?
Exactly this part of the CA constitution was used in part by the
conservatives to overturn various racial balancing shemes, which may
or may not have been a good thing. :)
BTW, since my SO and I are registered civil partners, we have to get a
dissoulution of that before we could get married if getting married
were legal.
Here's a question though: Does George Bush Believe Your Child Has the
Right to Marry for Love?
- Erin