Post by kelpzoidzlIchor doesn't get it that people could, just discuss things without
bitter recriminations. He also doesn't get it that when he throws
stones, eventually he is going to get them hurled back. Anything that
is outside his knowledge or experience is automatically wrong in his
mind. I am not the least bit afraid of getting gnaged up on by
Ichor, Boaz, Padraig or Portia. They are just lame in behavior and
poor representatives of Stanley Kubrick in a NG, regardless of the
occasional good information they may find opr discuss.
Ichor, imagines that AMK is a blog owned by him and Boaz and anyone
he allows into his gang--as long as they take thjeir narrow side. Its
a delusion that he even defends Padraig when he is in his flame out
mode.
Beyond all that which is just commonsense, ichor and Boaz have a
nasty, devisive, gang mentality, which in my view is antithetical to
everything Kubrick stood for.
You want nasty? You haven't seen how nasty I can get, you worthless,
pothead, acid dropping asshole! Who the fuck are you to pass judgment
on me, Ichorwhip and Genevieve? You are the one who has come into the
discussion and piss all over everything. I post reviews and essays on
books about Kubrick, and then you dismiss them as "book reports" from
your ivory tower and proceed to make asinine comments on Kubrick being
some acid dropping Buddhist who belonged to some secret society, which
you also were conveniently a member of at the same time. How about
taking off that tin-foil hat while you pull your head out of your ass,
you hypocrite?
Post by kelpzoidzlThere are many millions of Kubrick fans
who are devoted to Kubrick that shouldn;t be looked down on.
And I'm one of them! And so is Ichorwhip and Genevieve. And we do not
have to justify our admiration of Kubrick to you. We have had plenty
of years of posting to show how we feel about his films, and most of
the posts are intelligent and thought out, not like your knee-jerk
responses, usually peppered with references to LSD, or reminicenses of
your "hippie days." Yeah, right. You are a phony from the get-go,
Kelpsy. You have all the charm of Michael Savage and David Horowitz
(and I don't mean the consumer advocate either).
Post by kelpzoidzlOnly a
handful of people read or post to AMK. There a a dozen excellent blog
companies where people can write blogs for free and have total
control over the content. I suggest him and boaz go to one and stop
bothering with with they wish to think are beneath them.
Are you telling us to get off of the Kubrick newsgroup and write about
Kubrick elsewhere instead of here? You are truly demented. Been
sprinkling a little LSD into your bong water there again? Where will
our "departure" leave the newsgroup? For you to post your Buffy shit
and more of your bullshit about Kubrick being a member of some acid-
dropping secret Buddhist sect? Who the fuck are you to tell us to
leave and blog elsewhere? You take arrogance to another level.
Yes, I am furious. I despise people like you, Kelpsy. You bring out
the worst in people, and you've brought out the worst in me. You have
no positive traits whatsovever, and you see to it that no one else
here can bring out theirs. You make them defensive from the get-go.
You enjoy pushing people's buttons, don't you? You do it a lot here.
Many intelligent posters would love to have your head on a pike.
Post by kelpzoidzli've put up with this nonsense ever since i had the audacity to tell a
personal experience related to Kubrick regarding buddhism,
You created this nonsense, and it was audacious for you to tell such
lies. Prove it then. Prove it. Give us some clear, concise evidence.
Post by kelpzoidzlor tell of
what I had heard in the 60's regarding LSD and Kubrick from a very
reliable source---a medical professional whom I wont name due to
privacy issues.
Yeah, you don't want such records to go public, right? It might damage
you professionally if people found out you were instituionalized and
had to undergo electroshock therapy. You don't want to find yourself
schlepping bedpans back and forth again, right?
Post by kelpzoidzlIt was common knowledge within a particular group of
people at the time, when LSD was a legal thing.
When was LSD ever legal in this country, Dr. Leary? It was *always*
illegal. Now, it was *fashionable* to drop acid back in the '60s, but
legal? No way. What alternate universe did you drop out of? Or was it
a tree?
Post by kelpzoidzlI am not sure which
one of three or four people actually gave it to him and have no idea
how many time he experimented--maybe only once.
You don't know because it never happened, dickhead.
Post by kelpzoidzlI do not know and
have always made that clear.
Because you made it all up. Because you are mentally ill yourself, is
that it?
Post by kelpzoidzlLikewise I have also always said that I
do not know anything about Kubrick's later degree of Buddhist
conviction beyond his intial buddhist initiation.
Because he never had any initiation. When did he find the time to do
that? Are you suggesting Kubrick was like Vonnegut's Billy Pilgrim,
able to live on Tralfamadore yet continue to live a normal life on
earth, despite being thrown back and forth in time? Is your acid
flashback permanent? Are too many of your brain cells now nothing more
than prune-whipped yogurt?
Post by kelpzoidzlMany people would
attend the buddhist initiation, receive a paper scroll version of the
mandala and go about thier lives.
A scroll, or a roll of toilet paper?
Post by kelpzoidzlI do know that in order to receive
that initiation a person did have to be practising and did have to
know the basics and I also know as we all do that Kubrick would delve
into the study of things deeply and how private a person he was.
So, if Kubrick was so private, how is it that you happened to have all
of this intimate knowledge of his life? How is it that you know more
than his family? Are you saying you know more than Katharina, who used
to post here frequently? Or is she fed up with an asshole like you?
Post by kelpzoidzlsimilarly when ACC says "I am a crypto buddhist" I know exactly what
he means.
OMG! You were now tight buds with Clarke? Were you his butt-buddy too?
Post by kelpzoidzlFor me I would always be interested in knowing anything people on AMK
had experienced or had personal knowledge of, that shed light on
Kubrick or his films and I would always, take what was said, in good
faith.
Why? You would only refute what was being written, contradict the
people who posted it and then go on your Buffy rants, your Buddhist
rants and personal recollections that have nothing to do with anything
Kubrick. By the time the thread ran itself out the subject would have
changed at least half a dozen times. That's your MO, Kelpzilla. You
derail the discussion so that anyone coming in will not see the
original post, only your "Oh woe is me! I'm being picked on by Ichor,
Padraig and Boaz again! Lordy, lordy, what can an aging pothead do?"
Post by kelpzoidzlBeing nasty is just nasty and if I have to defend myself from nasty
people I will, although lowering myself down to that level sucks.
You have attacked me repeatedly, you shit! You drew first blood.
Everytime I posted my comments on a book about Kubrick or Kubrick's
films you'd jump all over me and contradict what I'd written, saying
it wasn't that important. You are a bully, Kelps. You cannot do this
in the real world, so you come here to this newsgroup and take out
your childhood hangups on us. You prolly can't have anyone be in the
same room with you for five minutes without them wanting to rip your
throat out. You'd try Ghandi's patience.
You are intimidated by the things Genevieve, Ichorwhip, Padraig and I
write. You prolly breezed through school, and that eventually caught
up with you when it came time to engage in any intelligent discussion.
I've met people like you in person, and they use the same tactics to
derail a discussion. You can't do it, so you try to make sure no one
else can do it.
Post by kelpzoidzlI would suggest Wordpress, Technorati or Blogger as a good place for
Boaz, Ichor to take their "serious" Kubrick discussion to, so they
don't have to listen to anyone else or allow anyone that may have
something to say that isn't within the bounds of their ability ot
comprehend. Padraig too Might consider using one of those blogs for
his commie stuff.
And I suggest you take a flying fuck. What is this, King of AMK? You
worthless piece of shit. Are you telling us to go play elsewhere? Take
our discussions of Kubrick AWAY from the Kubrick newsgroup? So you can
go on about your silly, meaningless bullshit about Kubrick being some
member of an acid-dropping Buddhist sect? You are warped, Kelpsy. You
are like a lot of people I've met who have hit 60 or older now. They
end up bitter over what they did in their youth, and now they've
become "born-again conservatives." You have shown what a racist scum
you are, with the way you've gone on about Obama. What do these videos
have to do with Kubrick? Huh? Answer me that, Kelpsy. This is the
Kubrick newsgroup, not the "I Hate Obama Because I am a Disgusting
Acid-Dropping Asshole Newsgroup."
Post by kelpzoidzlOur they just learn to be civil.---HA HA.--that'll be the day.
Not while you're around. You threw the gauntlet down long ago,
pothead. We had a pretty fair and interesting newsgroup until you
decided to piss all over everything, like some wolf out for prey.
By the way, I'm still sure it was you in those tighty-tight black gym
shorts that revealed some "male cellulite" at that time at the Borders
in West Hollywood a couple of years ago. I saw some white-haired sixty-
something talking to a clerk about the newest Buffy boxed set. And he
seemed pretty "enthusiastic" about it, to put it mildly. I've never
seen him back there. Did I "out" you then? If so, I'm doing it again.
I'm still here, and I'm not going anywhere.
Boaz
("You didn't scare me! Work on it!")