Post by coreHuh? The bombing of London was a myth?
You were talking about "us speaking German". To do that, at some point,
the British Isles are getting invaded. I don't recall those German
bombers dropping troops, they lost the Battle of Britain, and by no
means had the navy to clear out the Royal Navy from the Channel.
WWII also proved quite heartily that no level of bombing short of
nuclear can induce a nation to surrender without the credible threat of
boots on the ground as well. Germany bombed the piss out of London, as
you note, and, if anything, it simply made the English resolve stronger.
We scorched every fuckin' inch of Japan to the ground and it wasn't
until we started igniting goddamned suns over their cities and proved
that we could take any island we wanted with actual soldiers (not to
mention a coup attempt that almost succeeded in keeping them in the war)
that they saw reason and gave up (note: massive Soviet invasion of
Manchuria and South Sakhalin also helped here, but I'm still giving the
US 97% of the credit for Japan's defeat).
Fuck, Germany was a pile of ash long before either the Red Army or the
Western armies were within their pre-war borders; we still had to grind
our way across the entire fucking country before they surrendered.
So... tell me again how England's surrender (of just the Home Islands,
mind you, since London falling would still mean fuckall to Ottawa or
Melbourne or Christchurch...) occurs, given this.
Post by coreHad Germany won the war, it wouldn't have taken long before they were here.
The Germany that had no bombers capable of reaching American shores at
any point during the war, nor a carrier to get fighters close enough?
That Germany was going to invade us shortly after knocking Britain out?
I know your entire sense of self-worth is wrapped up in America having
"helped Britain smash the Krauts", but a) that's not true and b) we lost
the fucking peace entirely and immediately anyway at Yalta so who gives
a fuck anyways?
Post by coreThe soviets didn't have the engineering talent the germans had. It's a tossup
whether they could have beaten down the germans, given the resource advantage
they would have gained, winning.
But... they did have the production talent. Which the Germans did not.
Remember how much good their awesomely engineered Me-262 fighter jets
and unstoppable King Tiger tanks did them?
None. Stalin was on to something when he remarked that "Quantity has a
quality all its own". Hell, if Engineering mattered that much, WE
would've lost the war because the Sherman was a complete piece of shit
until the last variants near the end of the war, but being able to toss
100 fully-fueled pieces of shit at the one Tiger the Germans could get
to a battlefield and provide with a quarter tank of petrol did the trick.
Post by coreI dont' think so.
Not the first time you'd be wrong around here.
--
smr