is space expanding literally everywhere?

[The Starmaker]

I'm a layman and I'm curious to understand how mass affects the expansion of space and whether the expansion of space is uniform everywhere in the universe.
From looking at redshifts it seems we have determined that until 5 billion years ago the expansion was slowing down and since then it has been speeding up. Supposedly the average density of mass in the universe is affecting the expansion - is this just conjecture and the only theory we have or is there some solid evidence for thinking this?
Wikipedia says "the scale of space itself changes" but that the model is valid only on large scales (galaxy clusters and above) and that the expansion cannot be observed on a smaller scale. wikipedia Is it possible that space between say, planet Earth and the Sun is actually expanding but is currently unobservable. If not, how far from our local group of galaxies do we have to look before we encounter some space that is actually expanding.
I realise that we don't understand what dark energy is and I much prefer answers that say "we don't know" if we really don't know.

Based on observation...

mass affect the expansion of the universe, but not uniform because mass gets caught up in galaxies and solar systems.

like punching your way out of a paper bag...

Based on my observation...this photo shows the history before the big bang.
Loading Image...


Before the big bang occured, or the cause of the big bang..was

the steady state universe existed before the big bang.

Based on my observation..

during the steady state universe stars didn't die
and new stars were born
(galaxies didn't exist then either)

It got to a point that there were to many stars
occupying what little space there was..

to the point that stars got close to each other..
they began to meld...with each other..

to a point of
forming mass.

The steady state universe turn into one
giant boulder of hot stars and rock was formed
so that you got this giant hot bolder made from stars
that exploded and made more...space.

During the explosion some rocks when this way and other rocks when that way.

You can probably guess the rest...

[The Starmaker]

Post by The Starmaker

I'm a layman and I'm curious to understand how mass affects the expansion of space and whether the expansion of space is uniform everywhere in the universe.
From looking at redshifts it seems we have determined that until 5 billion years ago the expansion was slowing down and since then it has been speeding up. Supposedly the average density of mass in the universe is affecting the expansion - is this just conjecture and the only theory we have or is there some solid evidence for thinking this?
Wikipedia says "the scale of space itself changes" but that the model is valid only on large scales (galaxy clusters and above) and that the expansion cannot be observed on a smaller scale. wikipedia Is it possible that space between say, planet Earth and the Sun is actually expanding but is currently unobservable. If not, how far from our local group of galaxies do we have to look before we encounter some space that is actually expanding.
I realise that we don't understand what dark energy is and I much prefer answers that say "we don't know" if we really don't know.

Based on observation...
mass affect the expansion of the universe, but not uniform because mass gets caught up in galaxies and solar systems.
like punching your way out of a paper bag...
Based on my observation...this photo shows the history before the big bang.
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
Before the big bang occured, or the cause of the big bang..was
the steady state universe existed before the big bang.
Based on my observation..
during the steady state universe stars didn't die
and new stars were born
(galaxies didn't exist then either)
It got to a point that there were to many stars
occupying what little space there was..
to the point that stars got close to each other..
they began to meld...with each other..
to a point of
forming mass.
The steady state universe turn into one
giant boulder of hot stars and rock was formed
so that you got this giant hot bolder made from stars
that exploded and made more...space.
During the explosion some rocks when this way and other rocks when that way.
You can probably guess the rest...

Here is an 'illustration' of what it looked like moments before the big bang..
Loading Image...


As you can see the "we don't know people" (which is a cover up word for 'i don't know' individuals')

got it wrong:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olbers%27_paradox


You need to stay away from the 'we don't know people' because they have reached their level of incompetance.

(the 'we don't know people' are actually individuals who won't take responsibility for what they don't know.)

(and like all cults, they expect everyone around them to say...'we don't know')

But Nature knows. So, one must look not just here for answers, but...everywhere. (where ever you can find it)

If Nature knows...then it's not we, it's ....THEM that don't know.


But, I'm not one of their ...lemmings.


Do you dare go against the "we don't know people" ?


I mean, I base it all on observations. I have the photograph of before the big bang (which is the same thing as the end
of the steady state universe) and it's a huge burning bolder made from stars just before it explodes.

Or just take this illustration and add a bang to it:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d2/Olber%27s_Paradox_-_All_Points.gif

Or, become a lemming and wait for the "we don't know people" to tell you when to think.


The Starmaker

[The Starmaker]

Post by The Starmaker

I'm a layman and I'm curious to understand how mass affects the expansion of space and whether the expansion of space is uniform everywhere in the universe.
From looking at redshifts it seems we have determined that until 5 billion years ago the expansion was slowing down and since then it has been speeding up. Supposedly the average density of mass in the universe is affecting the expansion - is this just conjecture and the only theory we have or is there some solid evidence for thinking this?
Wikipedia says "the scale of space itself changes" but that the model is valid only on large scales (galaxy clusters and above) and that the expansion cannot be observed on a smaller scale. wikipedia Is it possible that space between say, planet Earth and the Sun is actually expanding but is currently unobservable. If not, how far from our local group of galaxies do we have to look before we encounter some space that is actually expanding.
I realise that we don't understand what dark energy is and I much prefer answers that say "we don't know" if we really don't know.

Based on observation...
mass affect the expansion of the universe, but not uniform because mass gets caught up in galaxies and solar systems.
like punching your way out of a paper bag...
Based on my observation...this photo shows the history before the big bang.
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
Before the big bang occured, or the cause of the big bang..was
the steady state universe existed before the big bang.
Based on my observation..
during the steady state universe stars didn't die
and new stars were born
(galaxies didn't exist then either)
It got to a point that there were to many stars
occupying what little space there was..
to the point that stars got close to each other..
they began to meld...with each other..
to a point of
forming mass.
The steady state universe turn into one
giant boulder of hot stars and rock was formed
so that you got this giant hot bolder made from stars
that exploded and made more...space.
During the explosion some rocks when this way and other rocks when that way.
You can probably guess the rest...

...and for those of yous who haven't ...guess,



The big bang was in fact...the end of eternity. (the end of steady state universe)


So, you can easily gues the reason WHY the big bang occured...

to make way for the end of eternity...



Sounds like science fiction, doesn't it?

[john]

BB is BS

[m***@gmail.com]

The future of the universe is more distance.

Mitchell Raemsch

[john]

Space is simply smaller-gauge atoms. If distance between galaxies is really increasing, it is because of an influx of these.

[p***@gmail.com]

Post by john
Space is simply smaller-gauge atoms. If distance between galaxies is really increasing, it is because of an influx of these.

=============
it is not space that is 'expanding
space is nothing and does nothing

it is distance between planets/galaxies that is increasing
===
Y.Porat
======================

[john]

Porat

Post by john
Space is simply smaller-gauge atoms. If distance between galaxies is really increasing, it is because of an influx of these.

=============
it is not space that is 'expanding
space is nothing and does nothing "

Space is so full of energy that it boils over as electron/positron pairs everywhere

[The Starmaker]

The First step is you need to get rid of all the "universe comes from Nothing" people, cause they got Nothing in their heads and they want you
to have nothing in your heads and follow their cult.

The Next step is you need to take their 'puzzels' and re-arrange the puzzels yourself so the the pieces fit.

(right now they have their puzzel pieces all wrong)

You simply take one piece of the puzzel, the

steady state universe
the
big bang
and the current universe...
in that order

and the pieces all fit together.


(No one has bothered to put the three pieces together) (i don't know why, probably too many cults in the 'scientific community')


But there is only one universe...

it just..simply transformed all the energy from the steady state universe to the universe you see today.


The big bang in fact is the transformation process of energy.


i know it all.


I'm a fuckin jënyæs

Post by The Starmaker

Post by The Starmaker

I'm a layman and I'm curious to understand how mass affects the expansion of space and whether the expansion of space is uniform everywhere in the universe.
From looking at redshifts it seems we have determined that until 5 billion years ago the expansion was slowing down and since then it has been speeding up. Supposedly the average density of mass in the universe is affecting the expansion - is this just conjecture and the only theory we have or is there some solid evidence for thinking this?
Wikipedia says "the scale of space itself changes" but that the model is valid only on large scales (galaxy clusters and above) and that the expansion cannot be observed on a smaller scale. wikipedia Is it possible that space between say, planet Earth and the Sun is actually expanding but is currently unobservable. If not, how far from our local group of galaxies do we have to look before we encounter some space that is actually expanding.
I realise that we don't understand what dark energy is and I much prefer answers that say "we don't know" if we really don't know.

Based on observation...
mass affect the expansion of the universe, but not uniform because mass gets caught up in galaxies and solar systems.
like punching your way out of a paper bag...
Based on my observation...this photo shows the history before the big bang.
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
Before the big bang occured, or the cause of the big bang..was
the steady state universe existed before the big bang.
Based on my observation..
during the steady state universe stars didn't die
and new stars were born
(galaxies didn't exist then either)
It got to a point that there were to many stars
occupying what little space there was..
to the point that stars got close to each other..
they began to meld...with each other..
to a point of
forming mass.
The steady state universe turn into one
giant boulder of hot stars and rock was formed
so that you got this giant hot bolder made from stars
that exploded and made more...space.
During the explosion some rocks when this way and other rocks when that way.
You can probably guess the rest...

...and for those of yous who haven't ...guess,
The big bang was in fact...the end of eternity. (the end of steady state universe)
So, you can easily gues the reason WHY the big bang occured...
to make way for the end of eternity...

[The Starmaker]

What is the age of the universe? According to observation..it goes into the trillions or more! Not stupid 14 billion years...

there is no such thing as an "unobservable universe"...


Are you going to stand around waiting for your cult leaders to say every hundred years..."The universe is older than we thought."?


That's soooo stupid.


What is the name of your current leader anyway since Stephen Hawking is dead????


Is it going to be chink or the nigger? (i hope it's not another fuckin british guy...)

Post by The Starmaker
The First step is you need to get rid of all the "universe comes from Nothing" people, cause they got Nothing in their heads and they want you
to have nothing in your heads and follow their cult.
The Next step is you need to take their 'puzzels' and re-arrange the puzzels yourself so the the pieces fit.
(right now they have their puzzel pieces all wrong)
You simply take one piece of the puzzel, the
steady state universe
the
big bang
and the current universe...
in that order
and the pieces all fit together.
(No one has bothered to put the three pieces together) (i don't know why, probably too many cults in the 'scientific community')
But there is only one universe...
it just..simply transformed all the energy from the steady state universe to the universe you see today.
The big bang in fact is the transformation process of energy.
i know it all.
I'm a fuckin jënyæs

Post by The Starmaker

Post by The Starmaker

I'm a layman and I'm curious to understand how mass affects the expansion of space and whether the expansion of space is uniform everywhere in the universe.
From looking at redshifts it seems we have determined that until 5 billion years ago the expansion was slowing down and since then it has been speeding up. Supposedly the average density of mass in the universe is affecting the expansion - is this just conjecture and the only theory we have or is there some solid evidence for thinking this?
Wikipedia says "the scale of space itself changes" but that the model is valid only on large scales (galaxy clusters and above) and that the expansion cannot be observed on a smaller scale. wikipedia Is it possible that space between say, planet Earth and the Sun is actually expanding but is currently unobservable. If not, how far from our local group of galaxies do we have to look before we encounter some space that is actually expanding.
I realise that we don't understand what dark energy is and I much prefer answers that say "we don't know" if we really don't know.

Based on observation...
mass affect the expansion of the universe, but not uniform because mass gets caught up in galaxies and solar systems.
like punching your way out of a paper bag...
Based on my observation...this photo shows the history before the big bang.
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
Before the big bang occured, or the cause of the big bang..was
the steady state universe existed before the big bang.
Based on my observation..
during the steady state universe stars didn't die
and new stars were born
(galaxies didn't exist then either)
It got to a point that there were to many stars
occupying what little space there was..
to the point that stars got close to each other..
they began to meld...with each other..
to a point of
forming mass.
The steady state universe turn into one
giant boulder of hot stars and rock was formed
so that you got this giant hot bolder made from stars
that exploded and made more...space.
During the explosion some rocks when this way and other rocks when that way.
You can probably guess the rest...

...and for those of yous who haven't ...guess,
The big bang was in fact...the end of eternity. (the end of steady state universe)
So, you can easily gues the reason WHY the big bang occured...
to make way for the end of eternity...

[john]

"Starmaker

What is the age of the universe? According to observation..it goes into the trillions or more"

The Universe is Eternal.

[Odd Bodkin]

Post by john
"Starmaker
What is the age of the universe? According to observation..it goes into
the trillions or more"

You have confused observation with unsubstantiated beliefs.

Post by john
The Universe is Eternal.

[The Starmaker]

Post by Odd Bodkin

Post by john
"Starmaker
What is the age of the universe? According to observation..it goes into
the trillions or more"

You have confused observation with unsubstantiated beliefs.

Post by john
The Universe is Eternal.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Albert Einstein believed that the universe has no beginning and no end (known as the steady state universe). That would mean that age
of the universe is in the trillions....or more.


Not 14 billion.


I already stated that the steady state, the big bang and the current universe are in fact ...one universe.


Based on observation right here:

http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg


It's not my fault your college textbooks and proffesors have unsubstantiated beliefs. They are simply...wrong.

[john]

Star
"


It's not my fault your college textbooks and proffesors have unsubstantiated beliefs. They are simply...wrong.
"
But Odd believes.

And it won't matter what is observed.

He will always believe in his beloved books.

[Odd Bodkin]

Post by The Starmaker
Star
"
It's not my fault your college textbooks and proffesors have
unsubstantiated beliefs. They are simply...wrong.
"
But Odd believes.
And it won't matter what is observed.

And you mentioned trillions were observed. How?

Post by The Starmaker
He will always believe in his beloved books.

[john]

Odd
"And you mentioned trillions were observed. "
We all know that if YOU can't see it, it doesn't exist.
This goes for history as well as smallness, as well as classified observations revealed by scientists in the know in deathbed confession.

That's your 'science'.

Busy doing lots of 'woodwork ' lately, Odd?

[Odd Bodkin]

Post by john
Odd
"And you mentioned trillions were observed. "
We all know that if YOU can't see it, it doesn't exist.

John, you were the one saying that OBSERVATIONS confirm that the age of the
universe is trillions of years if not older.
Now if you say that the evidence is unseen, but it’s still true anyway,
then you’re a liar.
If you’re not a liar, then cough up the observations.

Post by john
This goes for history as well as smallness, as well as classified
observations revealed by scientists in the know in deathbed confession.
That's your 'science'.
Busy doing lots of 'woodwork ' lately, Odd?

[john]

Odd

Post by john
Odd
"And you mentioned trillions were observed. "
We all know that if YOU can't see it, it doesn't exist.

John, you were the one saying that OBSERVATIONS confirm that the age of the
universe is trillions of years if not older.
Now if you say that the evidence is unseen, but it’s still true anyway, "

No.
I didn't say that.
You need to learn to read.

[Odd Bodkin]

Post by Odd Bodkin
Odd

Post by john
Odd
"And you mentioned trillions were observed. "
We all know that if YOU can't see it, it doesn't exist.

John, you were the one saying that OBSERVATIONS confirm that the age of the
universe is trillions of years if not older.
Now if you say that the evidence is unseen, but it’s still true anyway, "
No.
I didn't say that.
You need to learn to read.

Here's the content of your post. You did not attribute the words to
anyone else.
=================
"Starmaker

What is the age of the universe? According to observation..it goes into
the trillions or more"

The Universe is Eternal.
==================

So John, what observations are you referring to here?

Or is your statement not based on any observations whatsoever?

[john]

Odd
Here's from the 7th
"What is the age of the universe? According to observation..it goes into the trillions or more! Not stupid 14 billion years...

there is no such thing as an "unobservable universe"...


Are you going to stand around waiting for your cult leaders to say every hundred years..."The universe is older than we thought."? "

As you see, Odd, you have reading comprehension difficulties- partially my fault for using my phone which doesn't provide attributes- but just read back a few, Odd. You can do it!!

I included Ace from Space's last bit about your cult, Odd- when are you guys going to come back to Logic and Sanity? These latest telescope observations really require a LOT of imagination to match to what your 'model' predicts. Nothing comes out of Black Holes? Poor Hawking.

As I said, "The Universe is Eternal".

Prove me wrong.

[Odd Bodkin]

Post by john
Odd
Here's from the 7th
"What is the age of the universe? According to observation..it goes into
the trillions or more! Not stupid 14 billion years...

So you said “According to observation..it goes into the trillions or more!”
WHAT observations?

Post by john
there is no such thing as an "unobservable universe"...

What on earth makes you think that everything in this universe is in
observable range?

Post by john
Are you going to stand around waiting for your cult leaders to say every
hundred years..."The universe is older than we thought."? "
As you see, Odd, you have reading comprehension difficulties- partially
my fault for using my phone which doesn't provide attributes- but just
read back a few, Odd. You can do it!!
I included Ace from Space's last bit about your cult, Odd-

Who? There was no attribution to him of what he said. If I have him
filtered the only way I’m going to know in a post of yours what you say and
what you’re lifting from someone else is if you credit the quote, which you
didn’t do. Unattributed quoting is dishonest.

Post by john
when are you guys going to come back to Logic and Sanity? These latest
telescope observations really require a LOT of imagination to match to
what your 'model' predicts. Nothing comes out of Black Holes? Poor Hawking.
As I said, "The Universe is Eternal".

Where’s the EVIDENCE of that?

Post by john
Prove me wrong.

Evidence points in the other direction, that at a finite time in the past,
everything was much, much, much closer together than today — so much so
that it was clearly much different looking than today. No galaxies, no
atoms, extremely hot.

[J***@.]

Post by Odd Bodkin

Post by john
The Universe is Eternal.

Yes, the four dimensional TimeScape is static, eternal;
at once nothing -and- everything.

Post by Odd Bodkin
Where’s the EVIDENCE of that?

All of history, every lesson ever, every advance, tells us:

Randomness is ignorance, nothing more.

Post by Odd Bodkin
Evidence points in the other direction, that at a finite time in the past,
everything was much, much, much closer together than today — so much so
that it was clearly much different looking than today. No galaxies, no
atoms, extremely hot.

Yes, the farther back in time we look, the less we know;
we don't just "approach" zero knowledge, we hit it.

Imagine the Earth, the Sun, the Solar system, the Milky Way,
Andromeda, and the hundreds of billions of galaxies we see today...
now add a little "gravity/eXergy" ( energy that can do physical work ),
so it all fits in the head of a pin.

When you're done, that's what it was like, 13.8 billion years ago:
no entropy, infinite eXergy/Gravity/Density... a black hole.

Lord Kelvin, 1852, originated the idea of universal heat death.
Eventually, gravity/eXergy will be consumed away, replaced with entropy;
leaving us with a uniform heat bath that has all of the energy
but none of the eXergy/Gravity/Density.

[john]

Odd

Post by john
Odd
Here's from the 7th
"What is the age of the universe? According to observation..it goes into
the trillions or more! Not stupid 14 billion years...

So you said “According to observation..it goes into the trillions or more!” "

No.
Starfaker said that.
I consistently say the Universe had no Beginning and will have no end.
Capiche, petit chou?

[Odd Bodkin]

Post by john
Odd

Post by john
Odd
Here's from the 7th
"What is the age of the universe? According to observation..it goes into
the trillions or more! Not stupid 14 billion years...

So you said “According to observation..it goes into the trillions or more!” "
No.
Starfaker said that.

Ah, so you quoted him without attribution. Shame.

Post by john
I consistently say the Universe had no Beginning and will have no end.

And your evidence for this is what? That before is before? That there can’t
be a lower limit because lower is lower? How are you with absolute zero on
the temperature scale? Can’t exist because lower is lower?

Post by john
Capiche, petit chou?

[john]

Odd
"so you quoted him without attribution. Shame.
"
Suck it up.

[Odd Bodkin]

Post by john
Odd
"so you quoted him without attribution. Shame.
"
Suck it up.

Or you could use a real tool.

[john]

Odd
"
Or you could use a real tool.
"
You're available?

[john]

Odd
Sorry I called you a 'real tool'.
Lying again- you're useful, I'm sure

[john]

Odd
It's always great to have you weigh in on things.
Keep up the good work

[J***@.]

The -known- Universe is finite.
Go back far enough, and the -known- Universe is zip, zero, nada.

[Lofty Goat]

Post by Odd Bodkin

Post by Odd Bodkin
Odd

Post by john
Odd
"And you mentioned trillions were observed. "
We all know that if YOU can't see it, it doesn't exist.

John, you were the one saying that OBSERVATIONS confirm that the age of the
universe is trillions of years if not older.
Now if you say that the evidence is unseen, but it’s still true anyway, "
No.
I didn't say that.
You need to learn to read.

Here's the content of your post. You did not attribute the words to
anyone else.
=================
"Starmaker
What is the age of the universe? According to observation..it goes into
the trillions or more"
The Universe is Eternal.
==================
So John, what observations are you referring to here?
Or is your statement not based on any observations whatsoever?

Trillions of seconds? Trillions of shakes of a sheep's tail?

(And yes, I know that a "shake" is an informal unit of measure of time,
and yes, the Universe is way more than a trillion shakes old.)

You know, they say a billion words ago the sailors disappeared, so maybe
that's what he's thinking. (Thinking?)

[The Starmaker]

Post by The Starmaker
What is the age of the universe? According to observation..it goes into the trillions or more! Not stupid 14 billion years...
there is no such thing as an "unobservable universe"...
Are you going to stand around waiting for your cult leaders to say every hundred years..."The universe is older than we thought."?
That's soooo stupid.
What is the name of your current leader anyway since Stephen Hawking is dead????
Is it going to be chink or the nigger? (i hope it's not another fuckin british guy...)

Post by The Starmaker
The First step is you need to get rid of all the "universe comes from Nothing" people, cause they got Nothing in their heads and they want you
to have nothing in your heads and follow their cult.
The Next step is you need to take their 'puzzels' and re-arrange the puzzels yourself so the the pieces fit.
(right now they have their puzzel pieces all wrong)
You simply take one piece of the puzzel, the
steady state universe
the
big bang
and the current universe...
in that order
and the pieces all fit together.
(No one has bothered to put the three pieces together) (i don't know why, probably too many cults in the 'scientific community')
But there is only one universe...
it just..simply transformed all the energy from the steady state universe to the universe you see today.
The big bang in fact is the transformation process of energy.
i know it all.
I'm a fuckin jënyæs

Post by The Starmaker

Post by The Starmaker

I'm a layman and I'm curious to understand how mass affects the expansion of space and whether the expansion of space is uniform everywhere in the universe.
From looking at redshifts it seems we have determined that until 5 billion years ago the expansion was slowing down and since then it has been speeding up. Supposedly the average density of mass in the universe is affecting the expansion - is this just conjecture and the only theory we have or is there some solid evidence for thinking this?
Wikipedia says "the scale of space itself changes" but that the model is valid only on large scales (galaxy clusters and above) and that the expansion cannot be observed on a smaller scale. wikipedia Is it possible that space between say, planet Earth and the Sun is actually expanding but is currently unobservable. If not, how far from our local group of galaxies do we have to look before we encounter some space that is actually expanding.
I realise that we don't understand what dark energy is and I much prefer answers that say "we don't know" if we really don't know.

Based on observation...
mass affect the expansion of the universe, but not uniform because mass gets caught up in galaxies and solar systems.
like punching your way out of a paper bag...
Based on my observation...this photo shows the history before the big bang.
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
Before the big bang occured, or the cause of the big bang..was
the steady state universe existed before the big bang.
Based on my observation..
during the steady state universe stars didn't die
and new stars were born
(galaxies didn't exist then either)
It got to a point that there were to many stars
occupying what little space there was..
to the point that stars got close to each other..
they began to meld...with each other..
to a point of
forming mass.
The steady state universe turn into one
giant boulder of hot stars and rock was formed
so that you got this giant hot bolder made from stars
that exploded and made more...space.
During the explosion some rocks when this way and other rocks when that way.
You can probably guess the rest...

...and for those of yous who haven't ...guess,
The big bang was in fact...the end of eternity. (the end of steady state universe)
So, you can easily gues the reason WHY the big bang occured...
to make way for the end of eternity...

"The steady state universe turn into one
giant boulder of hot stars and rock was formed
so that you got this giant hot bolder made from stars
that exploded and made more...space."

In other words, simply...that which you call the big bang was the
formation and distribution of...rocks.

Since before the big bang the steady state universe was just...stars.


Then, rock was formed and exploded into what you see today.

In terms of equations...


E=Mc^2

Earth equals Mass (rocks) light (stars)

or
'In the beginning God created the heavens....and the earth.'

"heavens" is the steady state universe, earth is the formation of rocks
(the ground you walk on)






....
but you're still a talking rock.

material that talks if you will...


If a fish could talk, he would complain about fish sticks at the
suppermakert...

and a talking cow would be picketting McDonalds.

and ants would say, watch what you're stepping on..



Your sciences or physics, whateveryoucallit, is in a ...disarray.