Discussion:
Sarah Palin could be President in 2009
(too old to reply)
Branson Hunter
2008-10-02 20:56:52 UTC
Permalink
Time published a viewpoint under the title Sarah Palin's Foreign
Policy Follies, by Romesh Ratnesar - Saturday, Sept. 27, 2008. Factual
points made in his article should be paid attention to by every
reasonable and prudent voting American. Because considering all the
hullabaloo paid to another young Texas Governor -- oozing with
confidence but lacking direction -- Eighty percent of Americans are
saying "never again." Here is a passage from Ratnesar's article.

"It takes a hard heart not to like Sarah Palin. She has a winning
personal story. She can be poised, charming and funny. As she showed
at the Republican National Convention, her ability to deliver set-
piece speeches — a big part of the job for all politicians, but
especially Presidents — is considerable. On balance, she's probably an
asset to John McCain. But we should stop pretending that she is ready
now or will be ready anytime in the foreseeable future to be Commander
in Chief." [emphasis added]

He also writes, "After watching the foreign-policy portion of her
disastrous Sept. 25 interview with CBS anchor Katie Co uric, "Palin
resembled a high schooler trying to BS her way through a book
report... Is there any situation in which John McCain would ask Palin
for advise on foreign policy? Would she give McCain advise like this
when she appeared to suggest that Russian Prime Minister Vladimir
Putin might be preparing a one-man airborne invasion of Alaska —
downright loony."

Loony indeed. It's disturbing. Sarah Palin could be President in
2009. This must be considered. Given that John McCain has had serious
forms of cancer four times, his elevated age and the hardships, trauma
and his PTSD -- there is a 1 in 3 chance Palin will be sworn in as
president in the next four years. And those odds increase if there is
a second term McCain Administration. Will President Palin sit in the
laps (sorry...) of all those guys what got us into this horrible
financial mess, two botched wars and 2 trillion in war debts? I think
the ultra neoconservative will dictate her foreign policy. After all,
what does she know about driving our economy and running simultaneous
war? First, her town of 4-6 thousand was 26 millions of dollars in
debt when she left office (and still in recovering). Second, she can
see Russia from her home.

Ratnesar also highlights some revelations that came out Palin's recent
interview with Katie Couric. He writes: "Most foreign policy hands —
including members of the current Administration — would have given
Couric the exact opposite answer [regarding the Pakistan situation]
that Palin did. If U.S. officials once praised Pakistanis cooperation
in the war on terror, they almost never do now. But Palin doesn't seem
to have noticed." Rather, she spoke of the political situation and
relations with Pakistan as, well, hunky-dory.

Ratnesar summarizes -- "Palin's response to Couric's questions about
the the goal of spreading democracy in the Islamic world -- Palin
repeated standard Bush platitudes [another third term anybody?]. The
same platitudes that got us into spending 2 trillion dollars in a two
five years wars without any resolution in sight." In other words,
should Palin becomes President -- is a one in three chance she will --
she's be making decisions that effects the entire world. If McCain is
gone, "Don't worry, be happy." The experience she lacks, the
neoconservative -- you know, the same ones that eighty percent of
Americans have had a bellyfull of -- will be there to nudge her in the
direction of no return.

Simply put, Ratnesar is saying "we should expect our leaders to be
fluent in at least the basics of foreign policy. So far, Palin is
still struggling for words." Ratnesar's full commentary can be found
at http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1845116,00.html

Branson
Strabo
2008-10-02 23:08:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Branson Hunter
Time published a viewpoint under the title Sarah Palin's Foreign
Policy Follies, by Romesh Ratnesar - Saturday, Sept. 27, 2008. Factual
points made in his article should be paid attention to by every
reasonable and prudent voting American. Because considering all the
hullabaloo paid to another young Texas Governor -- oozing with
confidence but lacking direction -- Eighty percent of Americans are
saying "never again." Here is a passage from Ratnesar's article.
"It takes a hard heart not to like Sarah Palin. She has a winning
personal story. She can be poised, charming and funny. As she showed
at the Republican National Convention, her ability to deliver set-
piece speeches — a big part of the job for all politicians, but
especially Presidents — is considerable. On balance, she's probably an
asset to John McCain. But we should stop pretending that she is ready
now or will be ready anytime in the foreseeable future to be Commander
in Chief." [emphasis added]
He also writes, "After watching the foreign-policy portion of her
disastrous Sept. 25 interview with CBS anchor Katie Co uric, "Palin
resembled a high schooler trying to BS her way through a book
report... Is there any situation in which John McCain would ask Palin
for advise on foreign policy? Would she give McCain advise like this
when she appeared to suggest that Russian Prime Minister Vladimir
Putin might be preparing a one-man airborne invasion of Alaska —
downright loony."
Loony indeed. It's disturbing. Sarah Palin could be President in
2009. This must be considered. Given that John McCain has had serious
forms of cancer four times, his elevated age and the hardships, trauma
and his PTSD -- there is a 1 in 3 chance Palin will be sworn in as
president in the next four years. And those odds increase if there is
a second term McCain Administration. Will President Palin sit in the
laps (sorry...) of all those guys what got us into this horrible
financial mess, two botched wars and 2 trillion in war debts? I think
the ultra neoconservative will dictate her foreign policy. After all,
what does she know about driving our economy and running simultaneous
war? First, her town of 4-6 thousand was 26 millions of dollars in
debt when she left office (and still in recovering). Second, she can
see Russia from her home.
Ratnesar also highlights some revelations that came out Palin's recent
interview with Katie Couric. He writes: "Most foreign policy hands —
including members of the current Administration — would have given
Couric the exact opposite answer [regarding the Pakistan situation]
that Palin did. If U.S. officials once praised Pakistanis cooperation
in the war on terror, they almost never do now. But Palin doesn't seem
to have noticed." Rather, she spoke of the political situation and
relations with Pakistan as, well, hunky-dory.
Ratnesar summarizes -- "Palin's response to Couric's questions about
the the goal of spreading democracy in the Islamic world -- Palin
repeated standard Bush platitudes [another third term anybody?]. The
same platitudes that got us into spending 2 trillion dollars in a two
five years wars without any resolution in sight." In other words,
should Palin becomes President -- is a one in three chance she will --
she's be making decisions that effects the entire world. If McCain is
gone, "Don't worry, be happy." The experience she lacks, the
neoconservative -- you know, the same ones that eighty percent of
Americans have had a bellyfull of -- will be there to nudge her in the
direction of no return.
Simply put, Ratnesar is saying "we should expect our leaders to be
fluent in at least the basics of foreign policy. So far, Palin is
still struggling for words." Ratnesar's full commentary can be found
at http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1845116,00.html
Branson
Quibbling over which sock puppet can jump highest while Rome burns.
Gunner
2008-10-03 16:32:27 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT), Branson Hunter
Post by Branson Hunter
He also writes, "After watching the foreign-policy portion of her
disastrous Sept. 25 interview with CBS anchor Katie Co uric, "Palin
resembled a high schooler trying to BS her way through a book
report... Is there any situation in which John McCain would ask Palin
for advise on foreign policy? Would she give McCain advise like this
when she appeared to suggest that Russian Prime Minister Vladimir
Putin might be preparing a one-man airborne invasion of Alaska —
downright loony."
Is it any wonder that Kourics ratings are falling through the basement
on their way to the center of the earth?

That juvenile bit of "catch me-fuck me" called an interview was
bullshit, but typical of a partisan leftist.

Say Branson..Im holding change in my hand, how much is there?

You dont know? Then you are too stupid to exist outside of a managed
care facility.

You know who the local dog catcher is? No? You must be uber stupid

President of Uzbekistand? No? Uber Uber Stupid!!!

Palin really scares the shit out of the leftwingers. If she didnt,
they wouldnt be spending so much time and effort in trying to destroy
her.
unknown
2008-10-03 16:52:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT), Branson Hunter
Post by Branson Hunter
He also writes, "After watching the foreign-policy portion of her
disastrous Sept. 25 interview with CBS anchor Katie Co uric, "Palin
resembled a high schooler trying to BS her way through a book
report... Is there any situation in which John McCain would ask Palin
for advise on foreign policy? Would she give McCain advise like this
when she appeared to suggest that Russian Prime Minister Vladimir
Putin might be preparing a one-man airborne invasion of Alaska —
downright loony."
Is it any wonder that Kourics ratings are falling through the basement
on their way to the center of the earth?
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*. That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Post by Gunner
That juvenile bit of "catch me-fuck me" called an interview was
bullshit, but typical of a partisan leftist.
Say Branson..Im holding change in my hand, how much is there?
You dont know? Then you are too stupid to exist outside of a managed
care facility.
You know who the local dog catcher is? No? You must be uber stupid
President of Uzbekistand? No? Uber Uber Stupid!!!
Palin really scares the shit out of the leftwingers. If she didnt,
they wouldnt be spending so much time and effort in trying to destroy
her.
Phlip
2008-10-03 18:27:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*. That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
unknown
2008-10-03 19:03:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*. That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest.... But then with Putin in public,
every word will be scripted as they always are.
Curly Surmudgeon
2008-10-03 19:59:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*. That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is
_too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest.... But then with Putin in public, every
word will be scripted as they always are.
No wonder Palin doesn't want to associate with the media. If Sarah can't
handle those easy questions from Couric then she's dead in the water with
real journalists.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$700,000,000,000.00 Not no but "HELL NO!"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-04 02:32:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*.  That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest....  But then with Putin in public, every
word will be scripted as they always are.
No wonder Palin doesn't want to associate with the media.  If Sarah can't
handle those easy questions from Couric then she's dead in the water with
real journalists.
Where are those "real" journalists? And what is your "rightful" name?
4767 Dead
2008-10-04 04:02:47 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 19:32:08 -0700 (PDT),
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*.  That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest....  But then with Putin in public, every
word will be scripted as they always are.
No wonder Palin doesn't want to associate with the media.  If Sarah can't
handle those easy questions from Couric then she's dead in the water with
real journalists.
Where are those "real" journalists? And what is your "rightful" name?
I wouldn't mind seeing her do a 15 minute interview with Jeremy Paxton
of Newsnight. Or even Katty Kaye of World News.

When will she be on the Daily Show?

Or David Letterman?
--

Opening up the health insurance market to more vigorous nationwide competition,
as we have done over the last decade in banking, would provide more choices of
innovative products less burdened by the worst excesses of state-based regulation.
-- John McCain, in the Sept/Oct 2008 issue of Contingencies, the magazine of the
American Academy of Actuaries.
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
Zepps_News-***@yahoogroups.com
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
Zepps_essays-***@yahoogroups.com
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
Steve
2008-10-04 12:45:57 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:02:47 -0700, 4767 Dead
Post by 4767 Dead
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 19:32:08 -0700 (PDT),
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*.  That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest....  But then with Putin in public, every
word will be scripted as they always are.
No wonder Palin doesn't want to associate with the media.  If Sarah can't
handle those easy questions from Couric then she's dead in the water with
real journalists.
Where are those "real" journalists? And what is your "rightful" name?
His court records have him as David Brian Jamieson..
Post by 4767 Dead
I wouldn't mind seeing her do a 15 minute interview with Jeremy Paxton
of Newsnight. Or even Katty Kaye of World News.
Why would any legitimate U S Presidential candidate give an interview
to the BBC?
Post by 4767 Dead
When will she be on the Daily Show?
Or David Letterman?
Pride is the recognition of the fact that you are your own
highest value and, like all of man’s values, it has to be
earned.
_Ayn Rand "ATLAS SHRUGGED"
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 01:32:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steve
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:02:47 -0700, 4767 Dead
Post by 4767 Dead
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 19:32:08 -0700 (PDT),
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*.  That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest....  But then with Putin in public, every
word will be scripted as they always are.
No wonder Palin doesn't want to associate with the media.  If Sarah can't
handle those easy questions from Couric then she's dead in the water with
real journalists.
Where are those "real" journalists?  And what is your "rightful" name?
His court records have him as David Brian Jamieson..
"Curly" is David Brian Jamieson?
Post by Steve
Post by 4767 Dead
I wouldn't mind seeing her do a 15 minute interview with Jeremy Paxton
of Newsnight.  Or even Katty Kaye of World News.  
Why would any legitimate U S Presidential candidate give an interview
to the BBC?
Why would anyone listen to such an interview?
Post by Steve
Post by 4767 Dead
When will she be on the Daily Show?
Or David Letterman?
Pride is the recognition of the fact that you are your own
highest value and, like all of man’s values, it has to be
earned.
_Ayn Rand  "ATLAS SHRUGGED"
Letterman is a jerk and just stares at the female guests tits.
Al.E. Gator
2008-10-06 03:06:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steve
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:02:47 -0700, 4767 Dead
_Ayn Rand "ATLAS SHRUGGED"
Letterman is a jerk and just stares at the female guests tits.
and you republicans stare at the men's crotches
Curly Surmudgeon
2008-10-06 03:22:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Al.E. Gator
Post by Steve
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:02:47 -0700, 4767 Dead
_Ayn Rand "ATLAS SHRUGGED"
Letterman is a jerk and just stares at the female guests tits.
and you republicans stare at the men's crotches
Bada-boom!
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jail to the Chief
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
Post by Al.E. Gator
Post by Steve
at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
Gunner Asch
2008-10-06 05:12:12 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:06:48 -0400, "Al.E. Gator" <Gator for Prez.com>
Post by Al.E. Gator
Post by Steve
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:02:47 -0700, 4767 Dead
_Ayn Rand "ATLAS SHRUGGED"
Letterman is a jerk and just stares at the female guests tits.
and you republicans stare at the men's crotches
And you liberals suck on mens crotches


"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich
Al.E. Gator
2008-10-06 06:38:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:06:48 -0400, "Al.E. Gator" <Gator for Prez.com>
Post by Al.E. Gator
Post by Steve
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:02:47 -0700, 4767 Dead
_Ayn Rand "ATLAS SHRUGGED"
Letterman is a jerk and just stares at the female guests tits.
and you republicans stare at the men's crotches
And you liberals suck on mens crotches
too late gomer, read a noospaper you ignorant, retarded hillbilly piece of
shit
Gunner Asch
2008-10-06 10:55:56 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 02:38:58 -0400, "Al.E. Gator" <Gator for Prez.com>
Post by Al.E. Gator
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:06:48 -0400, "Al.E. Gator" <Gator for Prez.com>
Post by Al.E. Gator
Post by Steve
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:02:47 -0700, 4767 Dead
_Ayn Rand "ATLAS SHRUGGED"
Letterman is a jerk and just stares at the female guests tits.
and you republicans stare at the men's crotches
And you liberals suck on mens crotches
too late gomer, read a noospaper you ignorant, retarded hillbilly piece of
shit
Too late? You stopped sucking mens crotches?

Given your delight at it...I dont think you will ever quit.


"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich

T***@nospam.net
2008-10-06 09:40:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:06:48 -0400, "Al.E. Gator" <Gator for Prez.com>
Post by Al.E. Gator
Post by Steve
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:02:47 -0700, 4767 Dead
_Ayn Rand "ATLAS SHRUGGED"
Letterman is a jerk and just stares at the female guests tits.
and you republicans stare at the men's crotches
And you liberals suck on mens crotches
You keep talking like a closet homosexual goober. Is that why you keep
worrying and whining about them?
Post by Gunner Asch
"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies and
kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich
Jerome Curtis
2008-10-06 05:25:39 UTC
Permalink
news:7dba8dbe-69ba-4563-8f72-
Post by Steve
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:02:47 -0700, 4767 Dead
_Ayn Rand "ATLAS SHRUGGED"
Letterman is a jerk and just stares at the female guests tits.
and you republicans stare at the men's crotches
What is it with you liberals and your obsession with men's crotches? Did
all the "men" in your families pull a Deliverance thing on your asses
every weekend or something?

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=6ns6so&s=4
Al.E. Gator
2008-10-06 06:41:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerome Curtis
news:7dba8dbe-69ba-4563-8f72-
Post by Steve
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:02:47 -0700, 4767 Dead
_Ayn Rand "ATLAS SHRUGGED"
Letterman is a jerk and just stares at the female guests tits.
and you republicans stare at the men's crotches
What is it with you liberals and your obsession with men's crotches? Did
all the "men" in your families pull a Deliverance thing on your asses
every weekend or something?
that be a hillbilly thang yall, read a noospaper goober

I understand that your mccunt boy has set up an office in every major
airport men's room
and the hillbillies are lined up for blocks waiting to sell their votes for
the best head they've ever had
Steve
2008-10-06 10:08:28 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 18:32:18 -0700 (PDT),
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Steve
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:02:47 -0700, 4767 Dead
Post by 4767 Dead
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 19:32:08 -0700 (PDT),
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*.  That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest....  But then with Putin in public, every
word will be scripted as they always are.
No wonder Palin doesn't want to associate with the media.  If Sarah can't
handle those easy questions from Couric then she's dead in the water with
real journalists.
Where are those "real" journalists?  And what is your "rightful" name?
His court records have him as David Brian Jamieson..
"Curly" is David Brian Jamieson?
No, that's Zepp....


Pride is the recognition of the fact that you are your own
highest value and, like all of man’s values, it has to be
earned.
_Ayn Rand "ATLAS SHRUGGED"
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 10:41:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steve
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 18:32:18 -0700 (PDT),
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Steve
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:02:47 -0700, 4767 Dead
Post by 4767 Dead
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 19:32:08 -0700 (PDT),
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*.  That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is
_too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest....  But then with Putin in public, every
word will be scripted as they always are.
No wonder Palin doesn't want to associate with the media.  If Sarah can't
handle those easy questions from Couric then she's dead in the water with
real journalists.
Where are those "real" journalists?  And what is your "rightful" name?
His court records have him as David Brian Jamieson..
"Curly" is David Brian Jamieson?
No, that's Zepp....
Oh. OK. I was going to check to "no-fly" list.
d***@yahoo.com
2008-10-05 14:29:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*.  That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest....  But then with Putin in public, every
word will be scripted as they always are.
No wonder Palin doesn't want to associate with the media.  If Sarah can't
handle those easy questions from Couric then she's dead in the water with
real journalists.
--
Regards, Curly
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­---
                $700,000,000,000.00    Not no but "HELL NO!"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­---
I don't want to associate with the media. Everytime I see a story on
something I have personal knowledge of, they get it wrong. So am I
supposed to assume that they get everything else right?
Gunner Asch
2008-10-05 22:28:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@yahoo.com
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*.  That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest....  But then with Putin in public, every
word will be scripted as they always are.
No wonder Palin doesn't want to associate with the media.  If Sarah can't
handle those easy questions from Couric then she's dead in the water with
real journalists.
--
Regards, Curly
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­---
                $700,000,000,000.00    Not no but "HELL NO!"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­---
I don't want to associate with the media. Everytime I see a story on
something I have personal knowledge of, they get it wrong. So am I
supposed to assume that they get everything else right?
Curlys mental state is such, unfortuantely..that he believes
everything he sees in the media. It makes for interesting reading of
his posts, when he expounds on something the Media got wrong..then had
to print a retraction.

He goes from "fact" to "fact" like a weathervane in a changing wind.
Which explains why so many of his posts make him look dizzy.

Mind numbed drones tend to be that way, mores the pity. Look up Mind
Numbed Drone on Wikipedia, and Curlys picture is at the top of the
column.

Gunner

"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 01:35:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*. That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest.... But then with Putin in public, every
word will be scripted as they always are.
No wonder Palin doesn't want to associate with the media. If Sarah can't
handle those easy questions from Couric then she's dead in the water with
real journalists.
--
Regards, Curly
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­ ---
$700,000,000,000.00 Not no but "HELL NO!"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­ ---
I don't want to associate with the media.  Everytime I see a story on
something I have personal knowledge of, they get it wrong.  So am I
supposed to assume that they get everything else right?
Curlys mental state is such, unfortuantely..that he believes
everything he sees in the media.  It makes for interesting reading of
his posts, when he expounds on something the Media got wrong..then had
to print a retraction.
He and the other Bobs have obviously been listening to Alex Jones of
late.
Post by Gunner Asch
He goes from "fact" to "fact" like a weathervane in a changing wind.
Which explains why so many of his posts make him look dizzy.
I thought it was his lasics...
Post by Gunner Asch
Mind numbed drones tend to be that way, mores the pity.  Look up Mind
Numbed Drone on Wikipedia, and Curlys picture is at the top of the
column.
Gunner
"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies.  Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Curly has demanded that we call him by his "rightful name." Steve
says it's David Brian Jamieson.
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 10:43:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*. That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest.... But then with Putin in public, every
word will be scripted as they always are.
No wonder Palin doesn't want to associate with the media. If Sarah can't
handle those easy questions from Couric then she's dead in the water with
real journalists.
--
Regards, Curly
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­­ ---
$700,000,000,000.00 Not no but "HELL NO!"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­­ ---
I don't want to associate with the media.  Everytime I see a story on
something I have personal knowledge of, they get it wrong.  So am I
supposed to assume that they get everything else right?
Curlys mental state is such, unfortuantely..that he believes
everything he sees in the media.  It makes for interesting reading of
his posts, when he expounds on something the Media got wrong..then had
to print a retraction.
He and the other Bobs have obviously been listening to Alex Jones of
late.
Post by Gunner Asch
He goes from "fact" to "fact" like a weathervane in a changing wind.
Which explains why so many of his posts make him look dizzy.
I thought it was his lasics...
Post by Gunner Asch
Mind numbed drones tend to be that way, mores the pity.  Look up Mind
Numbed Drone on Wikipedia, and Curlys picture is at the top of the
column.
Gunner
"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies.  Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Curly has demanded that we call him by his "rightful name."  Steve
says it's David Brian Jamieson.-
Retract, apparently someone going by Zepp is David Brian Jamieson.
Dan
2008-10-03 20:50:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*. That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is
_too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest.... But then with Putin in public,
every word will be scripted as they always are.
In what way was Ms. Couric dishonest?

Dan
RM V2.0
2008-10-04 15:50:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dan
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*. That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest.... But then with Putin in public, every
word will be scripted as they always are.
In what way was Ms. Couric dishonest?
Dan
By editing the video to misrepresent the interview. Anyone, even Clinton who
was an excellent speaker, could be made to be a stammering jackass with the
right questions and editing.
4767 Dead
2008-10-04 16:38:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by RM V2.0
Post by Dan
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*. That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest.... But then with Putin in public, every
word will be scripted as they always are.
In what way was Ms. Couric dishonest?
Dan
By editing the video to misrepresent the interview. Anyone, even Clinton who
was an excellent speaker, could be made to be a stammering jackass with the
right questions and editing.
Or, in Palin's case, by NOT editing...
--

Opening up the health insurance market to more vigorous nationwide competition,
as we have done over the last decade in banking, would provide more choices of
innovative products less burdened by the worst excesses of state-based regulation.
-- John McCain, in the Sept/Oct 2008 issue of Contingencies, the magazine of the
American Academy of Actuaries.
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
Zepps_News-***@yahoogroups.com
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
Zepps_essays-***@yahoogroups.com
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
Dan
2008-10-04 20:23:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by RM V2.0
Post by Dan
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*. That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest.... But then with Putin in public, every
word will be scripted as they always are.
In what way was Ms. Couric dishonest?
Dan
By editing the video to misrepresent the interview. Anyone, even Clinton who
was an excellent speaker, could be made to be a stammering jackass with the
right questions and editing.
Allowing your assertion, for the sake of argument, what does that have
to do with Ms. Couric?

Dan
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-04 02:30:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*.  That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest....  But then with Putin in public,
every word will be scripted as they always are.
Had Katie done that to Putin, the KGB would arrange a drive by.
House of Pancakes
2008-10-04 10:47:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*. That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest.... But then with Putin in public,
every word will be scripted as they always are.
Had Katie done that to Putin, the KGB would arrange a drive by.
-------------------------

Had Katie done that to Cheney, we'd all be nuked.
unknown
2008-10-04 15:09:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by unknown
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*. That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest.... But then with Putin in public,
every word will be scripted as they always are.
Had Katie done that to Putin, the KGB would arrange a drive by.
Radioactive suicide for Katie....??????????
4767 Dead
2008-10-04 16:39:34 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 11:09:17 -0400, *Poetic Justice*
Post by unknown
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by unknown
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*. That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest.... But then with Putin in public,
every word will be scripted as they always are.
Had Katie done that to Putin, the KGB would arrange a drive by.
Radioactive suicide for Katie....??????????
Care for a nice cuppa tea, Katie?
--

Opening up the health insurance market to more vigorous nationwide competition,
as we have done over the last decade in banking, would provide more choices of
innovative products less burdened by the worst excesses of state-based regulation.
-- John McCain, in the Sept/Oct 2008 issue of Contingencies, the magazine of the
American Academy of Actuaries.
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
Zepps_News-***@yahoogroups.com
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
Zepps_essays-***@yahoogroups.com
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
Phlip
2008-10-04 16:48:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by 4767 Dead
Post by unknown
Radioactive suicide for Katie....??????????
Care for a nice cuppa tea, Katie?
Point. A slow, tasteless poison, in tiny amounts, like Polonium, is an
assassin's wet dream. If it's slow, you can't easily trace your steps all the
way back to where you got the dose.
Gunner Asch
2008-10-04 19:35:42 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 11:09:17 -0400, *Poetic Justice*
Post by unknown
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by unknown
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*. That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest.... But then with Putin in public,
every word will be scripted as they always are.
Had Katie done that to Putin, the KGB would arrange a drive by.
Radioactive suicide for Katie....??????????
Polonium Punch


"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich
d***@yahoo.com
2008-10-05 14:27:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be,
that means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be
something that she is *NOT*.  That just showed the dishonesty of the
editors and Couric.
Palin might have to negotiate with Putin, and Katie Couric is _too_mean_???
Katie's Not mean just dishonest....  But then with Putin in public,
every word will be scripted as they always are.
Putin would have arranged for a KGB drive-by.
Curly Surmudgeon
2008-10-03 19:14:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
Post by Gunner
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT), Branson Hunter
Post by Branson Hunter
He also writes, "After watching the foreign-policy portion of her
disastrous Sept. 25 interview with CBS anchor Katie Co uric, "Palin
resembled a high schooler trying to BS her way through a book report...
Is there any situation in which John McCain would ask Palin for advise
on foreign policy? Would she give McCain advise like this when she
appeared to suggest that Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin might be
preparing a one-man airborne invasion of Alaska -- downright loony."
Is it any wonder that Kourics ratings are falling through the basement
on their way to the center of the earth?
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be, that
means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be something
that she is *NOT*. That just showed the dishonesty of the editors and
Couric.
That's the most twisted logic I've read in a long time.

Keep up the good work!
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$700,000,000,000.00 Not no but "HELL NO!"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
Post by unknown
Post by Gunner
Post by Branson Hunter
at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
House of Pancakes
2008-10-04 10:47:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Curly Surmudgeon
Post by unknown
Post by Gunner
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT), Branson Hunter
Post by Branson Hunter
He also writes, "After watching the foreign-policy portion of her
disastrous Sept. 25 interview with CBS anchor Katie Co uric, "Palin
resembled a high schooler trying to BS her way through a book report...
Is there any situation in which John McCain would ask Palin for advise
on foreign policy? Would she give McCain advise like this when she
appeared to suggest that Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin might be
preparing a one-man airborne invasion of Alaska -- downright loony."
Is it any wonder that Kourics ratings are falling through the basement
on their way to the center of the earth?
That interview is now exposed as the Liberal attack that it was, it's
obvious that Sara Palin isn't what that interview depicted her to be, that
means that Couric was intentionally trying to paint Palin to be something
that she is *NOT*. That just showed the dishonesty of the editors and
Couric.
That's the most twisted logic I've read in a long time.
Keep up the good work!
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$700,000,000,000.00 Not no but "HELL NO!"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Goonar is twisted.
Dan
2008-10-03 18:01:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner
Palin really scares the shit out of the leftwingers.
As a VP candidate, she scares the bejeebus out of ANY and EVERY
intelligent, sane person on the planet that cares about the health and
welfare of the united States.
Post by Gunner
If she didnt,
they wouldnt be spending so much time and effort in trying to destroy
her.
Define "leftwinger." Define "destroy."

Specify how much time and effort have been spent by "leftwingers" in
trying to destroy her.

Thanks for your cooperation.

Dan
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-04 02:34:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dan
Post by Gunner
Palin really scares the shit out of the leftwingers.
As a VP candidate, she scares the bejeebus out of ANY and EVERY
intelligent, sane person on the planet that cares about the health and
welfare of the united States.
There you go again wanting free health care and welfare...
Post by Dan
Post by Gunner
If she didnt,
they wouldnt be spending so much time and effort in trying to destroy
her.
Define "leftwinger."  Define "destroy."
Specify how much time and effort have been spent by "leftwingers" in
trying to destroy her.
Thanks for your cooperation.
Dan
Pretty much all the time. Except when they are lying about the cause
of the sub-prime loan mess.
Phlip
2008-10-04 02:38:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
There you go again wanting free health care and welfare...
It's only "free" if you never pay taxes.

Or do you like paying high taxes and getting almost no services?
h***@nospam.org
2008-10-04 02:42:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by h***@hotmail.com
There you go again wanting free health care and welfare...
It's only "free" if you never pay taxes.
Or do you like paying high taxes and getting almost no services?
like all good conservatives, he want's everyone else to pay taxes but
him, but he gets all the services he want.
RM V2.0
2008-10-04 15:51:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@nospam.org
Post by Phlip
Post by h***@hotmail.com
There you go again wanting free health care and welfare...
It's only "free" if you never pay taxes.
Or do you like paying high taxes and getting almost no services?
like all good conservatives, he want's everyone else to pay taxes but
him, but he gets all the services he want.
True Conservatives want lower taxes and consequently smaller govt.
Phlip
2008-10-04 15:56:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by RM V2.0
True Conservatives want lower taxes and consequently smaller govt.
Except...

All the countries with a standard of living higher than ours...

...and all the emerging Pacific Rim countries that have thrown out their
dictators and started developing their infrastructures...

...they all have one thing in common.

They exert government control over their big business, via regulation that
forces them to remain responsive to their people. That helps them lower taxes,
as a side-effect.

That's not "socialism". Socialism is things like publicly owned Post Offices,
Amtrak, the Army, or Medicare. We already have that.

So it seems we have a slight dichotomy between which parts of our governments
need to be smaller ... and which need to be stronger.
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 01:41:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by RM V2.0
True Conservatives want lower taxes and consequently smaller govt.
Except...
All the countries with a standard of living higher than ours...
...and all the emerging Pacific Rim countries that have thrown out their
dictators and started developing their infrastructures...
...they all have one thing in common.
They exert government control over their big business, via regulation that
forces them to remain responsive to their people. That helps them lower taxes,
as a side-effect.
That's not "socialism". Socialism is things like publicly owned Post Offices,
Amtrak, the Army, or Medicare. We already have that.
So it seems we have a slight dichotomy between which parts of our governments
need to be smaller ... and which need to be stronger.
Oh, an expert on the Army? Kindly list your dates of service.
Al.E. Gator
2008-10-06 03:12:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by RM V2.0
True Conservatives want lower taxes and consequently smaller govt.
Except...
All the countries with a standard of living higher than ours...
...and all the emerging Pacific Rim countries that have thrown out their
dictators and started developing their infrastructures...
...they all have one thing in common.
They exert government control over their big business, via regulation that
forces them to remain responsive to their people. That helps them lower taxes,
as a side-effect.
That's not "socialism". Socialism is things like publicly owned Post Offices,
Amtrak, the Army, or Medicare. We already have that.
So it seems we have a slight dichotomy between which parts of our governments
need to be smaller ... and which need to be stronger.
Oh, an expert on the Army? Kindly list your dates of service.
why don't you list bush's,cheney's,limbaughs,hannnitty's,
o'lielly's,gibson's, hewitt's,ingraham's,
elder's,michael reagan's, gallagher's,rove's,gramm's,palin's,the 1st
dude's,william's,
and your fux news liars along with murdoch, that australian, walking,talking
cadaver and gutless, cocksucking Nazi,
or that $150 billion cocksucking, hillbilly walton family,

you loud mouth,yellow, gutless, piece of shit
Gunner Asch
2008-10-06 05:13:48 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:12:37 -0400, "Al.E. Gator" <Gator for Prez.com>
Post by Al.E. Gator
Post by Phlip
So it seems we have a slight dichotomy between which parts of our governments
need to be smaller ... and which need to be stronger.
Oh, an expert on the Army? Kindly list your dates of service.
why don't you list bush's,cheney's,limbaughs,hannnitty's,
o'lielly's,gibson's, hewitt's,ingraham's,
elder's,michael reagan's, gallagher's,rove's,gramm's,palin's,the 1st
dude's,william's,
and your fux news liars along with murdoch, that australian, walking,talking
cadaver and gutless, cocksucking Nazi,
or that $150 billion cocksucking, hillbilly walton family,
you loud mouth,yellow, gutless, piece of shit
So ol Gator puts himself on the same level as all those he posted
about, as he doesnt have a date of service, being the Jody Fuck he
admits to being.

Gunner

"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich
Al.E. Gator
2008-10-06 06:37:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:12:37 -0400, "Al.E. Gator" <Gator for Prez.com>
Post by Al.E. Gator
Post by Phlip
So it seems we have a slight dichotomy between which parts of our governments
need to be smaller ... and which need to be stronger.
Oh, an expert on the Army? Kindly list your dates of service.
why don't you list bush's,cheney's,limbaughs,hannnitty's,
o'lielly's,gibson's, hewitt's,ingraham's,
elder's,michael reagan's, gallagher's,rove's,gramm's,palin's,the 1st
dude's,william's,
and your fux news liars along with murdoch, that australian,
walking,talking
cadaver and gutless, cocksucking Nazi,
or that $150 billion cocksucking, hillbilly walton family,
you loud mouth,yellow, gutless, piece of shit
So ol Gator puts himself on the same level as all those he posted
about, as he doesnt have a date of service, being the Jody Fuck he
admits to being.
so gunner ass turns out to be another hillbilly psychic,mind reader,prophet,
and fortune teller, you know
one of those know it all, dick sucking hillbillies
who never do anything right but manage to fuck up everything they get near,

so tell us el goober swami :

where are those god damn WMD's

why wasn't the mission accomplished

why didn't the war cost only $60 billion

why isn't the economy strong,

why didn't the iraqis welcome us with open arms but rather with small arms

why is the stock market heading south

why did the republicans pick the closest thing to a democrat that they could
find

why have those ragheaded teenaged girls been kicking those hillbilly's asses
for 7 years

why do we have a $10 trillion debt, a $660 billion defecit, and why do we
have to pay $700 billion
to bail out the people who got all of your bush cocksucker's tax cuts

and why don't you hillbillies shut the hell up when you're light years
behind
Post by Gunner Asch
Gunner
republicans are dirty,ignorant,lying, useless losers,failures, fuckups, and
cocksuckers, always have been
and always will be

gunner my ass, you shit burning reject
unknown
2008-10-06 03:32:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Phlip
Post by RM V2.0
True Conservatives want lower taxes and consequently smaller govt.
Except...
All the countries with a standard of living higher than ours...
...and all the emerging Pacific Rim countries that have thrown out their
dictators and started developing their infrastructures...
...they all have one thing in common.
They exert government control over their big business, via regulation that
forces them to remain responsive to their people. That helps them lower taxes,
as a side-effect.
That's not "socialism". Socialism is things like publicly owned Post Offices,
Amtrak, the Army, or Medicare. We already have that.
That's Fascism.
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Phlip
So it seems we have a slight dichotomy between which parts of our governments
need to be smaller ... and which need to be stronger.
Oh, an expert on the Army? Kindly list your dates of service.
T***@nospam.net
2008-10-06 09:40:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Phlip
Post by RM V2.0
True Conservatives want lower taxes and consequently smaller govt.
Except...
All the countries with a standard of living higher than ours...
...and all the emerging Pacific Rim countries that have thrown out their
dictators and started developing their infrastructures...
...they all have one thing in common.
They exert government control over their big business, via regulation that
forces them to remain responsive to their people. That helps them lower taxes,
as a side-effect.
That's not "socialism". Socialism is things like publicly owned Post Offices,
Amtrak, the Army, or Medicare. We already have that.
That's Fascism.
No they are not, you moron. -->You clearly have no knowledge of this
nation, or its founding.

Socialism is bailing out the rich crooks on wallstreet. However, you
being a right wing asshole, always fail to mention such things as that.
Post by unknown
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Phlip
So it seems we have a slight dichotomy between which parts of our governments
need to be smaller ... and which need to be stronger.
Oh, an expert on the Army? Kindly list your dates of service.
h***@nospam.org
2008-10-04 16:29:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by RM V2.0
Post by h***@nospam.org
Post by Phlip
Post by h***@hotmail.com
There you go again wanting free health care and welfare...
It's only "free" if you never pay taxes.
Or do you like paying high taxes and getting almost no services?
like all good conservatives, he want's everyone else to pay taxes but
him, but he gets all the services he want.
True Conservatives want lower taxes and consequently smaller govt.
like most true conservatives you don't know the difference between
conservatism and libertarianism.


Hal
4767 Dead
2008-10-04 16:38:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by RM V2.0
Post by h***@nospam.org
Post by Phlip
Post by h***@hotmail.com
There you go again wanting free health care and welfare...
It's only "free" if you never pay taxes.
Or do you like paying high taxes and getting almost no services?
like all good conservatives, he want's everyone else to pay taxes but
him, but he gets all the services he want.
True Conservatives want lower taxes and consequently smaller govt.
Yeah, well, congratulations. I'm sure you're very happy with the Bush
administration.
--

Opening up the health insurance market to more vigorous nationwide competition,
as we have done over the last decade in banking, would provide more choices of
innovative products less burdened by the worst excesses of state-based regulation.
-- John McCain, in the Sept/Oct 2008 issue of Contingencies, the magazine of the
American Academy of Actuaries.
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
Zepps_News-***@yahoogroups.com
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
Zepps_essays-***@yahoogroups.com
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
Gunner Asch
2008-10-04 19:37:11 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:38:37 -0700, 4767 Dead
Post by 4767 Dead
Post by RM V2.0
Post by h***@nospam.org
Post by Phlip
Post by h***@hotmail.com
There you go again wanting free health care and welfare...
It's only "free" if you never pay taxes.
Or do you like paying high taxes and getting almost no services?
like all good conservatives, he want's everyone else to pay taxes but
him, but he gets all the services he want.
True Conservatives want lower taxes and consequently smaller govt.
Yeah, well, congratulations. I'm sure you're very happy with the Bush
administration.
The Bush administration is hardly Conservative. Its to the right of
Liberalism..but not all that far...arms length

Gunner

"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich
Phlip
2008-10-04 19:46:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
The Bush administration is hardly Conservative. Its to the right of
Liberalism..but not all that far...arms length
WikiPedia, last I checked, includes in its primary definition for "liberal" the
verbiage "rights of the individual above the group".

Not "rich individuals".

Bushie ideology is "neocon", which is a modern code-word for "corporatist",
"autocratic", and "fascist".
unknown
2008-10-04 20:42:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by Gunner Asch
The Bush administration is hardly Conservative. Its to the right of
Liberalism..but not all that far...arms length
WikiPedia, last I checked, includes in its primary definition for
"liberal" the verbiage "rights of the individual above the group".
That was the old definition, today they take away individual rights.
They are in bed with Socialist in the present.
Post by Phlip
Not "rich individuals".
Bushie ideology is "neocon", which is a modern code-word for
"corporatist", "autocratic", and "fascist".
Bush is not a conservative.
Gunner Asch
2008-10-05 00:30:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by Gunner Asch
The Bush administration is hardly Conservative. Its to the right of
Liberalism..but not all that far...arms length
WikiPedia, last I checked, includes in its primary definition for "liberal" the
verbiage "rights of the individual above the group".
You used the Classical Liberal definition, which hardly applies to the
current Leftwing Liberal
Post by Phlip
Not "rich individuals".
Bushie ideology is "neocon", which is a modern code-word for "corporatist",
"autocratic", and "fascist".
My my my...does your ignorance never cease? First you dont know shit
about the term Liberal, now you call Marxist Democrats who became
republicans three words which also dont apply to the definition.


Do try harder fuckwit, try to break out of your programming and
actually look up words before you try to use them. You look stupid and
buffoonish at the moment.

Gunner

"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich
unknown
2008-10-04 20:59:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:38:37 -0700, 4767 Dead
The Bush administration is hardly Conservative. Its to the right of
Liberalism..but not all that far...arms length
I think conservative are as ready for Bush to leave as the Liberals are.


We need Economic conservatism and Libertarian social structure.
Non scrivetemi
2008-10-04 22:55:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:38:37 -0700, 4767 Dead
The Bush administration is hardly Conservative. Its to the right of
Liberalism..but not all that far...arms length
Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign's Abusive Use of Missouri Law
Enforcement
JEFFERSON CITY - Gov. Matt Blunt today issued the following statement
on news reports that have exposed plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama
to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his
critics.
"St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City
Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer,
and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire
McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the
Obama-Biden campaign.
"What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond
words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is
abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence
political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal
punishment.
"This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred
principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more
offensive to Jefferson's thinking than using the power of the state to
deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose
of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away
from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress
support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this
anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads
about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on
television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation
about the election.
"Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press
constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we
ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no
credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law
enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent
of the Sedition Acts - not a free society." "
Since when was signing up new voters a crime? Only with a fuckhead
like Blunt. I am from Missouri. Blunt is a dickhead empty suit.
Obama's folks are organized to the hilt. They have definite target
states and counties. Can you say "ORGANIZED"?
Nope, because most people just call them hysterical "WHIGGERS"
or "NIGGER LOVERS".

If the Justice Department had any balls, they'd have Obama, the
tinhorned monkey in a suit, arrested for violating the civil
rights of all Americans, and trying to suborn the voting process.

It might happen yet.
I think conservative are as ready for Bush to leave as the Liberals are.
We need Economic conservatism and Libertarian social structure.
Gunner Asch
2008-10-05 00:31:27 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 00:55:51 +0200 (CEST), "Non scrivetemi"
Post by Non scrivetemi
Nope, because most people just call them hysterical "WHIGGERS"
or "NIGGER LOVERS".
If the Justice Department had any balls, they'd have Obama, the
tinhorned monkey in a suit, arrested for violating the civil
rights of all Americans, and trying to suborn the voting process.
It might happen yet.
No you..are a real racist and gutter scum.

Off to the bozo bin you go.

<plink>

Gunner

"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich
T***@nospam.net
2008-10-05 09:07:31 UTC
Permalink
Take your hate and racism and get out of here goober. Better yet, get
your hate filled ass to iraq and do some real damage. We might get lucky
when you find a IED and the gene pool is cleaned a little.






In <***@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info>, on
10/05/2008
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:38:37 -0700, 4767 Dead
The Bush administration is hardly Conservative. Its to the right of
Liberalism..but not all that far...arms length
Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign's Abusive Use of Missouri Law
Enforcement
JEFFERSON CITY - Gov. Matt Blunt today issued the following statement
on news reports that have exposed plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama
to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his
critics.
"St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City
Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer,
and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire
McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the
Obama-Biden campaign.
"What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond
words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is
abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence
political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal
punishment.
"This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred
principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more
offensive to Jefferson's thinking than using the power of the state to
deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose
of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away
from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress
support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this
anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads
about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on
television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation
about the election.
"Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press
constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we
ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no
credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law
enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent
of the Sedition Acts - not a free society." "
Since when was signing up new voters a crime? Only with a fuckhead
like Blunt. I am from Missouri. Blunt is a dickhead empty suit.
Obama's folks are organized to the hilt. They have definite target
states and counties. Can you say "ORGANIZED"?
Nope, because most people just call them hysterical "WHIGGERS" or
"NIGGER LOVERS".
If the Justice Department had any balls, they'd have Obama, the
tinhorned monkey in a suit, arrested for violating the civil rights of
all Americans, and trying to suborn the voting process.
It might happen yet.
I think conservative are as ready for Bush to leave as the Liberals are.
We need Economic conservatism and Libertarian social structure.
Gunner Asch
2008-10-05 22:25:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by T***@nospam.net
Take your hate and racism and get out of here goober. Better yet, get
your hate filled ass to iraq and do some real damage. We might get lucky
when you find a IED and the gene pool is cleaned a little.
So if a cop busts a black dude robbing a liquor store..the cop is a
racist?

You surely picked the wrong nym.

It should have been LeftistInDenial....

Pity

Gunner
Post by T***@nospam.net
10/05/2008
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:38:37 -0700, 4767 Dead
The Bush administration is hardly Conservative. Its to the right of
Liberalism..but not all that far...arms length
Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign's Abusive Use of Missouri Law
Enforcement
JEFFERSON CITY - Gov. Matt Blunt today issued the following statement
on news reports that have exposed plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama
to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his
critics.
"St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City
Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer,
and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire
McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the
Obama-Biden campaign.
"What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond
words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is
abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence
political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal
punishment.
"This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred
principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more
offensive to Jefferson's thinking than using the power of the state to
deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose
of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away
from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress
support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this
anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads
about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on
television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation
about the election.
"Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press
constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we
ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no
credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law
enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent
of the Sedition Acts - not a free society." "
Since when was signing up new voters a crime? Only with a fuckhead
like Blunt. I am from Missouri. Blunt is a dickhead empty suit.
Obama's folks are organized to the hilt. They have definite target
states and counties. Can you say "ORGANIZED"?
Nope, because most people just call them hysterical "WHIGGERS" or
"NIGGER LOVERS".
If the Justice Department had any balls, they'd have Obama, the
tinhorned monkey in a suit, arrested for violating the civil rights of
all Americans, and trying to suborn the voting process.
It might happen yet.
I think conservative are as ready for Bush to leave as the Liberals are.
We need Economic conservatism and Libertarian social structure.
"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich
T***@nospam.net
2008-10-05 23:45:06 UTC
Permalink
Run along racist. You're boring us with your nonsense.
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by T***@nospam.net
Take your hate and racism and get out of here goober. Better yet, get
your hate filled ass to iraq and do some real damage. We might get lucky
when you find a IED and the gene pool is cleaned a little.
So if a cop busts a black dude robbing a liquor store..the cop is a
racist?
You surely picked the wrong nym.
It should have been LeftistInDenial....
Pity
Gunner
Post by T***@nospam.net
10/05/2008
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:38:37 -0700, 4767 Dead
The Bush administration is hardly Conservative. Its to the right of
Liberalism..but not all that far...arms length
Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign's Abusive Use of Missouri Law
Enforcement
JEFFERSON CITY - Gov. Matt Blunt today issued the following statement
on news reports that have exposed plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama
to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his
critics.
"St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City
Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer,
and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire
McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the
Obama-Biden campaign.
"What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond
words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is
abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence
political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal
punishment.
"This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred
principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more
offensive to Jefferson's thinking than using the power of the state to
deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose
of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away
from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress
support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this
anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads
about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on
television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation
about the election.
"Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press
constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we
ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no
credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law
enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent
of the Sedition Acts - not a free society." "
Since when was signing up new voters a crime? Only with a fuckhead
like Blunt. I am from Missouri. Blunt is a dickhead empty suit.
Obama's folks are organized to the hilt. They have definite target
states and counties. Can you say "ORGANIZED"?
Nope, because most people just call them hysterical "WHIGGERS" or
"NIGGER LOVERS".
If the Justice Department had any balls, they'd have Obama, the
tinhorned monkey in a suit, arrested for violating the civil rights of
all Americans, and trying to suborn the voting process.
It might happen yet.
I think conservative are as ready for Bush to leave as the Liberals are.
We need Economic conservatism and Libertarian social structure.
"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies and
kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich
Gunner Asch
2008-10-06 01:42:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by T***@nospam.net
Run along racist. You're boring us with your nonsense.
So FalseTeller...why are you a racist?
Post by T***@nospam.net
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by T***@nospam.net
Take your hate and racism and get out of here goober. Better yet, get
your hate filled ass to iraq and do some real damage. We might get lucky
when you find a IED and the gene pool is cleaned a little.
So if a cop busts a black dude robbing a liquor store..the cop is a
racist?
You surely picked the wrong nym.
It should have been LeftistInDenial....
Pity
Gunner
Post by T***@nospam.net
10/05/2008
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:38:37 -0700, 4767 Dead
The Bush administration is hardly Conservative. Its to the right of
Liberalism..but not all that far...arms length
Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign's Abusive Use of Missouri Law
Enforcement
JEFFERSON CITY - Gov. Matt Blunt today issued the following statement
on news reports that have exposed plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama
to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his
critics.
"St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City
Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer,
and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire
McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the
Obama-Biden campaign.
"What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond
words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is
abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence
political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal
punishment.
"This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred
principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more
offensive to Jefferson's thinking than using the power of the state to
deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose
of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away
from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress
support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this
anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads
about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on
television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation
about the election.
"Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press
constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we
ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no
credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law
enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent
of the Sedition Acts - not a free society." "
Since when was signing up new voters a crime? Only with a fuckhead
like Blunt. I am from Missouri. Blunt is a dickhead empty suit.
Obama's folks are organized to the hilt. They have definite target
states and counties. Can you say "ORGANIZED"?
Nope, because most people just call them hysterical "WHIGGERS" or
"NIGGER LOVERS".
If the Justice Department had any balls, they'd have Obama, the
tinhorned monkey in a suit, arrested for violating the civil rights of
all Americans, and trying to suborn the voting process.
It might happen yet.
I think conservative are as ready for Bush to leave as the Liberals are.
We need Economic conservatism and Libertarian social structure.
"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies and
kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich
"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich
Gunner Asch
2008-10-05 00:30:41 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 16:59:09 -0400, *Poetic Justice*
Post by unknown
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:38:37 -0700, 4767 Dead
The Bush administration is hardly Conservative. Its to the right of
Liberalism..but not all that far...arms length
I think conservative are as ready for Bush to leave as the Liberals are.
We need Economic conservatism and Libertarian social structure.
Ayup

Gunner

"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 01:44:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:38:37 -0700, 4767 Dead
The Bush administration is hardly Conservative.  Its to the right of
Liberalism..but not all that far...arms length
I think conservative are as ready for Bush to leave as the Liberals are.
We need Economic conservatism and Libertarian social structure.
He's worn out his welcome, but performed far better than Algore or
Kerry would have given all the circumstances.
unknown
2008-10-06 03:30:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by unknown
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:38:37 -0700, 4767 Dead
The Bush administration is hardly Conservative. Its to the right of
Liberalism..but not all that far...arms length
I think conservative are as ready for Bush to leave as the Liberals are.
We need Economic conservatism and Libertarian social structure.
He's worn out his welcome, but performed far better than Algore or
Kerry would have given all the circumstances.
I'll give Bush that...... he isn't the worst we could have had... he
just keeps running back to Liberalism
Curly Surmudgeon
2008-10-06 03:43:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:38:37 -0700, 4767 Dead
The Bush administration is hardly Conservative. Its to the right of
Liberalism..but not all that far...arms length
I think conservative are as ready for Bush to leave as the Liberals are.
We need Economic conservatism and Libertarian social structure.
He's worn out his welcome, but performed far better than Algore or Kerry
would have given all the circumstances.
I'll give Bush that...... he isn't the worst we could have had... he just
keeps running back to Liberalism
True, Cheney would have been worse but do you ever see Dick's right hand
when Bush is speaking?

Arguing who is worse is a waste of time, elect some good people...
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jail to the Chief
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
Post by unknown
Post by Gunner Asch
at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 10:45:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Curly Surmudgeon
Post by unknown
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:38:37 -0700, 4767 Dead
The Bush administration is hardly Conservative.  Its to the right of
Liberalism..but not all that far...arms length
I think conservative are as ready for Bush to leave as the Liberals are.
We need Economic conservatism and Libertarian social structure.
He's worn out his welcome, but performed far better than Algore or Kerry
would have given all the circumstances.
I'll give Bush that...... he isn't the worst we could have had... he just
keeps running back to Liberalism
True, Cheney would have been worse but do you ever see Dick's right hand
when Bush is speaking?
Arguing who is worse is a waste of time, elect some good people...
--
Regards, Curly
We could have had Colin Powell, if he only had the desire.
Curly Surmudgeon
2008-10-06 10:53:59 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 03:45:47 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:

Stop stalking me, cockroach.

Stop lying too.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jail to the Chief
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
unknown
2008-10-04 16:16:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@nospam.org
Post by Phlip
Post by h***@hotmail.com
There you go again wanting free health care and welfare...
It's only "free" if you never pay taxes.
Or do you like paying high taxes and getting almost no services?
like all good conservatives, he want's everyone else to pay taxes but
him, but he gets all the services he want.
My guess is he just wants everyone to pay taxes.
Phlip
2008-10-04 16:22:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
My guess is he just wants everyone to pay taxes.
I wouldn't mind if everyone were _able_ to pay taxes!
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 01:47:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
My guess is he just wants everyone to pay taxes.
I wouldn't mind if everyone were _able_ to pay taxes!
They would if they worked.
Phlip
2008-10-06 02:13:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Phlip
Post by unknown
My guess is he just wants everyone to pay taxes.
I wouldn't mind if everyone were _able_ to pay taxes!
They would if they worked.
Efficiency and progress is ours once more
Now that we have the satellite bomb
It's nice and quick and clean and gets things done
Away with excess enemy
But no less value to property
No sense in war but perfect sense at home:

The sun beams down on a brand new day
No more welfare tax to pay
Unsightly slums gone up in flashing light
Jobless millions whisked away
At last we have more room to play
All systems go to kill the poor tonight

Gonna
Kill kill kill kill Kill the poor:Tonight

Behold the sparkle of champagne
The crime rate's gone
Feel free again
O' life's a dream with you, Miss Lily White
Jane Fonda on the screen today
Convinced the liberals it's okay
So let's get dressed and dance away the night

While they:
Kill kill kill kill Kill the poor:Tonight
--
Phlip
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 01:40:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@nospam.org
Post by Phlip
Post by h***@hotmail.com
There you go again wanting free health care and welfare...
It's only "free" if you never pay taxes.
Or do you like paying high taxes and getting almost no services?
like all good conservatives, he want's everyone else to pay taxes but
him, but he gets all the services he want.
I pay my taxes, and I negotiate health care with my employer and my
doctor. No need for any gov't assistance in the matter.
Al.E. Gator
2008-10-06 03:08:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@nospam.org
Post by Phlip
Post by h***@hotmail.com
There you go again wanting free health care and welfare...
It's only "free" if you never pay taxes.
Or do you like paying high taxes and getting almost no services?
like all good conservatives, he want's everyone else to pay taxes but
him, but he gets all the services he want.
I pay my taxes, and I negotiate health care with my employer and my
Post by h***@nospam.org
doctor. No need for any gov't assistance in the matter.
under mccunt and the hillbilly slut, they will be assisting your employer in
paying for your health care
by taxing your ass for it and giving the taxes to the employer, look on the
mccunt and other assorted
cocksucker's website
T***@nospam.net
2008-10-06 09:40:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by h***@nospam.org
Post by Phlip
Post by h***@hotmail.com
There you go again wanting free health care and welfare...
It's only "free" if you never pay taxes.
Or do you like paying high taxes and getting almost no services?
like all good conservatives, he want's everyone else to pay taxes but
him, but he gets all the services he want.
I pay my taxes, and I negotiate health care with my employer and my
Post by h***@nospam.org
doctor. No need for any gov't assistance in the matter.
under mccunt and the hillbilly slut, they will be assisting your employer
in paying for your health care
by taxing your ass for it and giving the taxes to the employer, look on
the mccunt and other assorted
cocksucker's website
Yup. All the right wing asses are voting to have their taxes raised a
$1000 under mcCain -- while the rich (like mcCain himself) will get
millions more in tax cuts.


And they are all too stupid to figure it out.
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 10:48:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by h***@nospam.org
Post by Phlip
Post by h***@hotmail.com
There you go again wanting free health care and welfare...
It's only "free" if you never pay taxes.
Or do you like paying high taxes and getting almost no services?
like all good conservatives, he want's everyone else to pay taxes but
him, but he gets all the services he want.
I pay my taxes, and I negotiate health care with my employer and my
Post by h***@nospam.org
doctor.  No need for any gov't assistance in the matter.
under mccunt and the hillbilly slut, they will be assisting your employer
in  paying for your health care
by taxing your ass for it and giving the taxes to the employer,  look on
the  mccunt and other assorted
cocksucker's website
Yup.  All the right wing asses are voting to have their taxes raised a
$1000 under mcCain -- while the rich (like mcCain himself) will get
millions more in tax cuts.  
And they are all too stupid to figure it out.
Now explain what we get with Obama.
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 10:47:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by h***@nospam.org
Post by Phlip
Post by h***@hotmail.com
There you go again wanting free health care and welfare...
It's only "free" if you never pay taxes.
Or do you like paying high taxes and getting almost no services?
like all good conservatives, he want's everyone else to pay taxes but
him, but he gets all the services he want.
I pay my taxes, and I negotiate health care with my employer and my
Post by h***@nospam.org
doctor.  No need for any gov't assistance in the matter.
under mccunt and the hillbilly slut, they will be assisting your employer in
paying for your health care
by taxing your ass for it and giving the taxes to the employer,  look on the
mccunt and other assorted
cocksucker's website
Do you eat with that mouth?
unknown
2008-10-04 16:01:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by h***@hotmail.com
There you go again wanting free health care and welfare...
It's only "free" if you never pay taxes.
NO... It's free as long as Liberals sit on their ass....
30% of American Tax payers pay no tax. Now they want more free stuff.
Maybe they should have to pay at the top tax rates in order to have the
privilege of voting.
Post by Phlip
Or do you like paying high taxes and getting almost no services?
House of Pancakes
2008-10-04 10:45:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dan
Post by Gunner
Palin really scares the shit out of the leftwingers.
As a VP candidate, she scares the bejeebus out of ANY and EVERY
intelligent, sane person on the planet that cares about the health and
welfare of the united States.
There you go again wanting free health care and welfare...
----------------------------

Like McCain?
Dan
2008-10-04 20:19:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Dan
Post by Gunner
Palin really scares the shit out of the leftwingers.
As a VP candidate, she scares the bejeebus out of ANY and EVERY
intelligent, sane person on the planet that cares about the health and
welfare of the united States.
There you go again wanting free health care and welfare...
----------------------------
Like McCain?
Well, Hamster did make an interesting non-sequitur, which is normal for
her. She couldn't follow a thread if her life depended on it, but we
can depend upon THAT, at least...

Dan
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 01:49:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Dan
Post by Gunner
Palin really scares the shit out of the leftwingers.
As a VP candidate, she scares the bejeebus out of ANY and EVERY
intelligent, sane person on the planet that cares about the health and
welfare of the united States.
There you go again wanting free health care and welfare...
----------------------------
Like McCain?
Why do you hate disabled veterans?
Phlip
2008-10-06 02:14:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by House of Pancakes
Like McCain?
Why do you hate disabled veterans?
Like McCain hates them?

Look up his voting record on veterans issues.
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 02:25:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by House of Pancakes
Like McCain?
Why do you hate disabled veterans?
Like McCain hates them?
Look up his voting record on veterans issues.
Whydo YOU hate disabled veterans?
Phlip
2008-10-06 02:32:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Phlip
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by House of Pancakes
Like McCain?
Why do you hate disabled veterans?
Like McCain hates them?
Look up his voting record on veterans issues.
Whydo YOU hate disabled veterans?
Rawk! Polly wanta cracker?!

Rawk! Tweeet toot!

Rawk!
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 10:50:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by Phlip
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by House of Pancakes
Like McCain?
Why do you hate disabled veterans?
Like McCain hates them?
Look up his voting record on veterans issues.
Why do YOU hate disabled veterans?
Rawk! Polly wanta cracker?!
Rawk! Tweeet toot!
Rawk!
Why do YOU hate disabled veterans?
unknown
2008-10-06 03:25:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by House of Pancakes
Like McCain?
Why do you hate disabled veterans?
Like McCain hates them?
McCain is one of them.... are you saying he hates himself.
Post by Phlip
Look up his voting record on veterans issues.
T***@nospam.net
2008-10-06 09:40:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
Post by Phlip
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by House of Pancakes
Like McCain?
Why do you hate disabled veterans?
Like McCain hates them?
McCain is one of them.... are you saying he hates himself.
mcCain has voted against Vets, time and again. You right wing assholes
can't lie away his record.
Post by unknown
Post by Phlip
Look up his voting record on veterans issues.
RivahCat
2008-10-04 19:14:19 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT), a day that will live in infamy,
Branson Hunter stood on a soapbox and proclaimed:
:"It takes a hard heart not to like Sarah Palin"
:
Well then, as a white woman, I must have a hard heart, because I HATE
this bitch. She is no feminist. I am insulted that the Republicrap Party
thinks I would vote for McCain just because he has a female running
mate. If they were trying to approximate Hillary Clinton, they failed
miserably.
--
RivahCat >^..^<
"IN BAST WE TRUST"
Phlip
2008-10-04 19:24:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by RivahCat
Well then, as a white woman, I must have a hard heart, because I HATE
this bitch. She is no feminist. I am insulted that the Republicrap Party
thinks I would vote for McCain just because he has a female running
mate. If they were trying to approximate Hillary Clinton, they failed
miserably.
They weren't approximating her - that's just yet another smoke screen.

"They" (probably Rove) were providing the exact opposite of Obama:

- inexperienced & under-educated
- ignorant of law & the Constitution
- White & female
- intolerant & racist
- bitchy on stage
- trailer trash family
- uses religion as a whipping stick

Before Palin, McCain didn't have the racist vote. Now he does: You can tell by
the posts here...
Curly Surmudgeon
2008-10-04 19:48:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
Post by RivahCat
Well then, as a white woman, I must have a hard heart, because I HATE
this bitch. She is no feminist. I am insulted that the Republicrap Party
thinks I would vote for McCain just because he has a female running
mate. If they were trying to approximate Hillary Clinton, they failed
miserably.
They weren't approximating her - that's just yet another smoke screen.
- inexperienced & under-educated
- ignorant of law & the Constitution
- White & female
- intolerant & racist
- bitchy on stage
- trailer trash family
- uses religion as a whipping stick
Before Palin, McCain didn't have the racist vote.
Like McCain laughing while questioning Gwen Ifil's integrity because Obama
is mentioned in the book she is writing? McCain's inference is that Gwen
is black so therefore she's prejudiced...
Post by Phlip
Now he does: You can tell by the posts here...
--
Regards, Curly
Gunner Asch
2008-10-05 00:27:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phlip
They weren't approximating her - that's just yet another smoke screen.
- inexperienced & under-educated
- ignorant of law & the Constitution
- White & female
- intolerant & racist
- bitchy on stage
- trailer trash family
- uses religion as a whipping stick
Odd...beside the white and female part..it sounds EXACTLY like Obama

Gunner

"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich
Curly Surmudgeon
2008-10-04 19:31:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by RivahCat
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT), a day that will live in infamy,
:"It takes a hard heart not to like Sarah Palin"
Well then, as a white woman, I must have a hard heart, because I HATE this
bitch. She is no feminist. I am insulted that the Republicrap Party thinks
I would vote for McCain just because he has a female running mate. If they
were trying to approximate Hillary Clinton, they failed miserably.
Thank you for rebutting the mischaracterization perpetuated by Republicans
for two decades and air-heads who must submit to males.
--
Regards, Curly
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 01:56:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Curly Surmudgeon
Post by RivahCat
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT), a day that will live in infamy,
:"It takes a hard heart not to like Sarah Palin"
Well then, as a white woman, I must have a hard heart, because I HATE this
bitch. She is no feminist. I am insulted that the Republicrap Party thinks
I would vote for McCain just because he has a female running mate. If they
were trying to approximate Hillary Clinton, they failed miserably.
Thank you for rebutting the mischaracterization perpetuated by Republicans
for two decades and air-heads who must submit to males.
Wow! I didn't realize McCain had picked Palin twenty years ago. The
things one learns on usenet. Thanks for that little tidbit there Dave.
Curly Surmudgeon
2008-10-06 03:23:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Curly Surmudgeon
Post by RivahCat
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT), a day that will live in
:"It takes a hard heart not to like Sarah Palin"
Well then, as a white woman, I must have a hard heart, because I HATE
this bitch. She is no feminist. I am insulted that the Republicrap
Party thinks I would vote for McCain just because he has a female
running mate. If they were trying to approximate Hillary Clinton, they
failed miserably.
Thank you for rebutting the mischaracterization perpetuated by
Republicans for two decades and air-heads who must submit to males.
Wow! I didn't realize McCain had picked Palin twenty years ago. The
things one learns on usenet. Thanks for that little tidbit there Dave.
Stop stalking me, cockroach.

Stop lying too.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jail to the Chief
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Curly Surmudgeon
Post by RivahCat
at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 10:54:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Curly Surmudgeon
Post by Curly Surmudgeon
Post by RivahCat
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT), a day that will live in
:"It takes a hard heart not to like Sarah Palin"
Well then, as a white woman, I must have a hard heart, because I HATE
this bitch. She is no feminist. I am insulted that the Republicrap
Party thinks I would vote for McCain just because he has a female
running mate. If they were trying to approximate Hillary Clinton, they
failed miserably.
Thank you for rebutting the mischaracterization perpetuated by
Republicans for two decades and air-heads who must submit to males.
Wow!  I didn't realize McCain had picked Palin twenty years ago.  The
things one learns on usenet.  Thanks for that little tidbit there Dave.
Stop stalking me, cockroach.
Stop lying too.
--
Regards, Curly
Stop stalking me and address the matter.
Steve
2008-10-04 19:39:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by RivahCat
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT), a day that will live in infamy,
:"It takes a hard heart not to like Sarah Palin"
Well then, as a white woman, I must have a hard heart, because I HATE
this bitch. She is no feminist. I am insulted that the Republicrap Party
thinks I would vote for McCain just because he has a female running
mate. If they were trying to approximate Hillary Clinton, they failed
miserably.
Of course she wasn;t trying to " approximate Hillary Clinton." Palin
isn't at all like Hillary.. Sarah made it on her own instead of on
the shirt-tails of her husband, she doesn't look like thirty miles of
bad road, and she speaks with the voice of every american mom instead
of screeching and cackling like an old hen.
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 10:54:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by RivahCat
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT), a day that will live in infamy,
:"It takes a hard heart not to like Sarah Palin"
Well then, as a white woman, I must have a hard heart, because I HATE
this bitch. She is no feminist. I am insulted that the Republicrap Party
thinks I would vote for McCain just because he has a female running
mate. If they were trying to approximate Hillary Clinton, they failed
miserably.
Of course she wasn;t trying to " approximate Hillary Clinton."  Palin
isn't at all like Hillary..    Sarah made it on her own instead of on
the shirt-tails of her husband, she doesn't look like thirty miles of
bad road, and she speaks with the voice of every american mom instead
of screeching and cackling like an old hen.
These guys get all their political news from comedy shows.
Gunner Asch
2008-10-05 00:26:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by RivahCat
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT), a day that will live in infamy,
:"It takes a hard heart not to like Sarah Palin"
Well then, as a white woman, I must have a hard heart, because I HATE
this bitch. She is no feminist. I am insulted that the Republicrap Party
thinks I would vote for McCain just because he has a female running
mate. If they were trying to approximate Hillary Clinton, they failed
miserably.
Cunt..you hate anything Republican. If Hillary/Greer/Dwarkin etc etc
had switched to the GOP..you would hate them.

For fucks sake..be honest for a change.


"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich
h***@hotmail.com
2008-10-06 01:53:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by RivahCat
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT), a day that will live in infamy,
:"It takes a hard heart not to like Sarah Palin"
Well then, as a white woman, I must have a hard heart, because I HATE
this bitch. She is no feminist. I am insulted that the Republicrap Party
thinks I would vote for McCain just because he has a female running
mate. If they were trying to approximate Hillary Clinton, they failed
miserably.
--
RivahCat >^..^<
"IN BAST WE TRUST"
"Bitch" doesn't describe Hillary? And a feminist is a woman who
allows her husband to cavort the dark hallways with interns?

A feminist would have screamed bloody murder about management sexually
harassing innocent interns.

I learn something new every time I log onto the internet.
Loading...