Archimedes Plutonium
2019-04-23 02:18:39 UTC
2-Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off//making common-sense of the speed of light-- where it has two speeds-- a linear and a angular
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 12:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Every science depends upon and is affected by our understanding of
the interior of atoms
Not until recently have I come to appreciate the fact that all sciences end up with their two major tenets, their foundation-- (1) matter is atoms, including the universe itself (2) how the interior of atoms works.
The years 1900 to 2019 was mostly the triumph of quantum mechanics, and few of us in science take time out to appreciate that quantum mechanics is basically the Rutherford-Bohr model of .5MeV particles jumping from lower to higher orbits or from higher to lower orbits around a massive dense small nucleus. That is quantum mechanics-- discrete orbits of .5MeV particles.
But in 2018, when that picture of the interior of atoms all changed with the AP Model-- the inside of atoms are protons at 840MeV as coils of ring windings forming toruses for the Faraday Law and the electron is muon of 105 MeV single ring as bar magnet in Faraday Law, with neutron as 945MeV as capacitor and skin of atom.
You see, all of science changed in 2018 with the new truer picture of the inside of atoms. Every science from physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, cosmology, medicine, physiology, ecology, you name it, all sciences changed with a new understanding of the interior of atoms.
One of the largest changes, to give the reader a sense of the vast changes, is that before 2018, everyone in science thought the Sun and stars shine by fusion. But that is not true, for every star and our Sun would go blinking dimmly if fusion caused stars to shine. What causes stars to shine is that every atom inside a star is doing the Faraday Law of its muons thrusting through its proton coil. You see, a muon rarely is ever pryed away from its proton, even in the hottest stars. And these muons thrusting through their attendant protons, creates the radiation of all stars.
It is fair to say, that unless we have all science based on Atomic Theory-- all matter is made up of atoms, including the Universe itself, and the second great idea-- the interior of atoms is doing electricity magnetism laws of Maxwell theory, then we are not really doing science at all.
And a sad sad shame, that few in science have a logical mind to be ever in science. For as the 20th century and this 21st century shows, the crippled in mind of science still chase after their fake delusional gravity, Big Bang, black holes and General Relativity-- deluded fools of science-- but that is where the pork-barrel welfare money science is at-- delusions.
This writing clip goes into my "advice to a science career". The who or what in science you are attracted to-- tells whether you are wasting your life in science.
AP
On Saturday, April 20, 2019 at 6:47:25 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in plutonium-atom-universe:
Actually, it feels as though knowing what the inside of an atom is all about is is just as important or more important than knowing the Atomic Fact that all matter is made of atoms.
AP
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 23:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: science is dependent on knowing the interior of atoms Re: Every
science depends upon and is affected by our understanding of the interior
of atoms
science is dependent on knowing the interior of atoms Re: Every science depends upon and is affected by our understanding of the interior of atoms
So yes, it is neat, and cool, very cool, that science, all sciences have to have the Atomic Fact-- all matter is made up of atoms, but then, equally important, is the interior of atoms, that there is a Faraday, Ampere, Gauss and AP-Maxwell laws going on, especially the Faraday Law.
And without knowing the correct interior of atoms, just simply destroys most of physics, chemistry, biology, you name it. Destroys it so badly, that we thought our Sun shines due to fusion, when in truth, it shines due to Faraday law of muons thrusting through proton coils in each and every atom of the Sun. We see this today in the Jupiter auroras, those beautiful blue auroras of Jupiter, are caused by the muons thrusting through the proton coils in those atoms on the north and south pole of Jupiter. Jupiter, because of its auroras is a baby-star, borne the moment those auroras started. And, it could well be, that Jupiter's auroras started in this century, and that if say Maxwell or Newton had a telescope as powerful as our new telescopes and looked at the poles of Jupiter in their century, would not have seen those lights because Jupiter was not a new borne star back then.
AP
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 01:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles--
punch tab speed
more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles// punch tab speed
In another thread I was drilling into the speed of light to make it more "common sense".
In that other thread I spoke of the two features of light
(1) the constancy of the speed, never going over, never going under the speed of 3*10^8 meters/second
(2) being the maximum speed of all speeds
So the speed of light or photons has two features that define it. A constancy speed and a maximum speed. And here I want to add more in understanding.
Now, think of a pencil on a piece of paper, and the speed of the pencil is distance/time. Whether the pencil draws a straight line or a circle or anything else, it is distance drawing divided by the time spent in doing the drawing. And this is how we think of speed in our life.
However, there is another form of speed. One that is unknown until now.
Recall those pieces of paper or cardboard where something is in the paper held together by two tiny tabs and where you punch out the figure with your finger.
Now imagine a light-wave or photon as being a closed loop, a line of force that is an ellipse and if we draw that ellipse on a piece of paper-- its speed is as normal of a speed as if we clocked a pencil going around in a ellipse. But, what if the light-wave or photon was one of these tabs inside the paper and the speed of the tab-ellipse is just the amount of time to punch that tab ellipse out of the paper and there we have a ellipse-- at the speed of light.
So, now we have two types of Speed, the drawing of the ellipse and the tab punched out ellipse. No drawing of the ellipse will ever reach 3*10^8 meters/second. But, every punched out ellipse can be 3*10^8 meters/second.
Now, this is all good and great, but unless I can provide what the tab and punch out is, it goes nowhere.
Fortunately I have the tab punch out. It is electricity which is perpendicular to magnetism. So the tab punch out is the finger but in EM, it is electricity and what the electricity produces in its punch of a "preexisting magnetic closed loop ellipse" is it produces this ellipse at the speed of light.
So, does that concept of tab punch out explain the two Principles of speed of light? Well, surely it does so, in aces it explains it. The speed of light is constant-- and the electricity punch is the same no matter what the size of the ellipse is-- punches all ellipses out at one constant number 3*10^8 meters/second.
The speed of light is a maximum speed. Does the punch have a greater speed in punching? Well, no, because the punch is electricity, and so for a faster than light speed means you have to have electricity faster than light speed, and this would be an ever faster progression contradiction, for electricity is dual to magnetism.
So, this punch tab gives common sense to a concept that seemed beyond common sense.
AP
On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 4:27:36 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in plutonium atom universe:
Punch tab speed//more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed
Now this concords beautifully with the concept that light waves are Wires. So we do not think of a speed of wire, but rather a speed traveling on or in a wire.
So when a photon is produced it is punched out of space as one complete ellipse of closed loop wire. It is punched out of Space by electricity and no matter the size, the punching is all the same as 3*10^8 meters/second.
AP
On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 12:21:03 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in plutonium-atom-universe :
explaining "slow light" better as a punch speed Re: Punch tab speed
Most people are not happy with the Old Physics explanation of "slow light", as you send light through a BEC. So let us examine if the "punch speed" can better explain this phenomenon.
On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 12:14:13 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Quoting Wikipedia:
A Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) is a state of matter of a dilute gas of bosons cooled to temperatures very close to absolute zero (-273.15 °C). Under such conditions, a large fraction of bosons occupy the lowest quantum state, at which point microscopic quantum phenomena, particularly wavefunction interference, become apparent macroscopically. A BEC is formed by cooling a gas of extremely low density, about one-hundred-thousandth the density of normal air, to ultra-low temperatures.
AP
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 11:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: explaining slow light as it enters BEC Re: explaining "slow light"
better as a punch speed Re: Punch tab speed
explaining slow light as it enters BEC Re: explaining "slow light" better as a punch speed Re: Punch tab speed
So now, the easiest answer to how light is slowed down, even though, for it to exist, it must always travel at a constant speed of 3*10^8 meters/second, the easiest explanation is that light has two distinct types of speed, the punch-speed and the variable common speed of distance/time.
So that as light enters water from air, it is bent and slowed down in a d/t speed, but light is also a punch speed which is the ellipse closed loop.
So, if we talk about light, it is punch speed of a tiny ellipse or huge ellipse-- all having that same constant punch speed. But, when we talk about that ellipse entering a different medium such as air to water or air to BEC, then that ellipse in total is having a d/t speed.
So the ellipse speed is speed of light, but the light itself can have a d/t speed.
If that is still troubling to understand, think of the light wave as the ellipse-- a ring, either tiny ring or large ring and it is going around in circle at the speed of light. But the entire whole ring has a speed that is common speed of d/t. In the ring itself, no matter if tiny or the size of the Cosmos, the ring itself is speed of light, but that entire ring has a secondary speed that is variable as d/t.
On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 12:21:03 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Most people are not happy with the Old Physics explanation of "slow light", as you send light through a BEC. So let us examine if the "punch speed" can better explain this phenomenon.
On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 12:14:13 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Quoting Wikipedia:
A Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) is a state of matter of a dilute gas of bosons cooled to temperatures very close to absolute zero (-273.15 °C). Under such conditions, a large fraction of bosons occupy the lowest quantum state, at which point microscopic quantum phenomena, particularly wavefunction interference, become apparent macroscopically. A BEC is formed by cooling a gas of extremely low density, about one-hundred-thousandth the density of normal air, to ultra-low temperatures.
AP
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 13:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: comparing punch-speed to d/t speed Re: more progress on the "speed
of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed
comparing punch-speed to d/t speed Re: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed
So, now, let me see if I can prove that the speed of light waves or photons, comes in two types of speed
1) the punch-speed of a full ellipse
2) common ordinary speed of distance/time designated as d/t
Now a human, a car, a rocket, a atom has only a d/t speed. You cannot get these objects at the speed of light for they would have infinite rest mass.
But a punch-speed, like I spoke of earlier is where you have say a cosmic cardboard of all various sizes and shapes of ellipses, each ellipse being a light wave or photon. Some are the size of the Cosmos, many are the size of a atom such as helium or tin or uranium. And each is held in place by two tiny tabs where you punch the ellipse and it comes out of the cardboard. The speed of light wave is a punch-speed. Same speed to punch out any and all of these ellipses. Whether the cosmic size ellipse or the microscopic ellipse, all require a punch that is 3*10^8 meters/second punch, and out they come.
So, when Danish physicist Lene Hau at Harvard turns on a laser light to shot into a BEC what her team is doing is turning on punched-speed ellipses of light waves. Each ellipse is the speed of light 3*10^8 meters/second that means the photon is traveling around that ellipse regardless of size of the traveling. But, these ellipses in space also have a d/t speed. A speed for the individual ellipse itself. So as each ellipse is moving in Space and encounters a BEC, that speed d/t of that ellipse varies and is slowed down in the new medium of BEC.
As Dr. Hau turns off the laser light, all the ellipses immediately go off, even those inside the BEC medium. Correct me if wrong, on that.
Likewise, you or I turning on a lightbulb. The light waves come out as ellipses and travel in space until they enter a different medium. Say the glass of water nearby the light bulb. As I turn the light off, all the light disappears into darkness, no matter how far away the light has travelled when "on". The instant I turn the bulb off, all the light is off.
What explains that instantaneous off and on? Even the light inside the glass of water which has been slowed down, turns off just as all the light from that bulb turns off.
What explains that? The explanation is that there are two speeds in the world-- the punch-speed and the d/t speed.
The punch-speed is an entire ellipse which is punched by electricity, and the ellipse is a magnetic monopole. The d/t speed is our common ordinary speed we are all familar with.
So as we turn the light off, all the light, even the slowed light inside the BEC is off at that very same instant of time. What explains that is the ellipses all disappear the moment the light is turned off. Regardless of the d/t speed.
AP
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 15:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t speed
Re: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch
tab speed
Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t speed Re: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed
You see, there is something gravely missing in Old Physics on Light Waves, sorely missing and troubling. Light is EM and all of EM has to be circuit to exist. Photons and light-wave cannot be open ended- but rather a closed loop. That means all light waves are ellipses and the moment a bulb is turned off is the moment all the light from that bulb is off, no matter how far away (quantum entanglement) or how close to the bulb yet moving slowly in BEC.
Light is a wave but a wave in a circuit of closed ellipse.
AP
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 19:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: name for punch-speed is angular speed and normal speed is linear
speed Re: Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t
speed
name for punch-speed is angular speed and normal speed is linear speed Re: Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t speed
On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 5:31:47 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
You see, there is something gravely missing in Old Physics on Light Waves, sorely missing and troubling. Light is EM and all of EM has to be circuit to exist. Photons and light-wave cannot be open ended- but rather a closed loop. That means all light waves are ellipses and the moment a bulb is turned off is the moment all the light from that bulb is off, no matter how far away (quantum entanglement) or how close to the bulb yet moving slowly in BEC.
Light is a wave but a wave in a circuit of closed ellipse.
And, in a very real sense, we can say that Quantum Entanglement of the Bell Inequality is the same thing as the practical fact that as you have a light on-- the waves travel the entire universe at the speed of light, but very moment you turn the light off-- those waves cease to exist also, no matter how far from the source or whether in a slowed medium, BEC.
Now I learned a valuable lesson with "charge", that when you pin a silly name to a concept, it holds back that science, hinders and cripples the science. Charge is really wire, and should have been named "wire".
So, I have two distinct speeds, the regular normal speed of distance/time and then the punch-speed of ellipses of no matter what size, they are punched out of Space, each and every one of them at the speed of light 3*10^8 meters/second. Now, I cannot call it punch-speed, for I need a name that fits in with other physics.
In momentum we have two types, the linear and the angular. So, in speeds we should have two distinct types. The normal regular type of d/t, but also the rather unfamilar punch-speed and it is related to angular momentum. This angular momentum speed is the perimeter of a ellipse and no matter the size of the ellipse perimeter, these angular speeds are all the same, for all of them are formed in 3*10^8 meter/second.
The linear speed is variable, but reach the speed of light nor exceed it. The angular speed is a constant, and cannot exceed that speed. All material matter has these two speeds, but the rest mass of objects forbids them from reaching the speed of light.
There is experimental proof of what I say above is true. I need it validated though, for I am not sure of the Hau experiments into slowed-light, that if you turn off the laser light, the slowed light disappears along with the unslowed light the moment the bulb is off. I am presuming this is the case. And if the case, then the fact that the moment any bulb is turned off, is the very instant that all the light that came from that bulb vanishes also. (This adds new meaning to Olber's paradox, of why is the night sky black when it has all those photons traveling. It is black because of Quantum Entanglement, that the moment a light source goes out, all the photons from that source disappear also. So there never was a chance that the Cosmos is so full of photons that it is no longer light.
AP
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 22:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Proof that light waves have two speeds, a linear speed of
distance/time and a angular speed of 3*10^8meters/second
Proof that light waves have two speeds, a linear speed of distance/time and a angular speed of 3*10^8meters/second
The proof is simple, take any laser light beam, the strongest you can build and shine it. The instant you turn it off, is the instant the entire column of angular speed light waves turn off also.
We can even see it in the laboratory where Dr. Hau at Harvard conducts "slowed down light experiments, running a laser light through BEC". The instant Dr. Hau turns off the light source, the entire column of light waves turns off also, even inside the BEC.
As for outer space, our best laser gets attenuated fast. But we can imagine a laser shone to Space where it is traveling to a far far away galaxy, and we turn the laser off. Even though light travels at 3^10^8 meters/second. That entire column of light from that laser disappears the very moment it is turned off, even though it is light years distance away, every photon or light wave is connected back to the source-- the laser flashlight, and the instant it is turned off, the entire beam disappears. This is quantum entanglement or the Bell Inequality. But my point is that light has two distinct speeds. One speed is linear and is what slows light in a BEC. But the other speed of light, is angular and it matters not on distance at all, but only on a fact of a closed circuit. A closed circuit that is induced by electricity and the speed of light is a line-of-force in Faraday's magnetic lines of force, a ellipse. This angular speed corresponds to angular momentum. Just as the variable linear speed corresponds to linear momentum.
This angular speed provides the puzzling "constant speed" and a "maximum speed". In order for 3*10^8 meters/second be both a constant and a maximum speed, the speed has to be angular. Remember-- linear momentum is not conserved. Angular Momentum is conserved. In order to conserve angular momentum, you need a angular speed that is both constant and a maximum.
All of that is proven by just one simple observation experiment-- run a laser through BEC, and slow light down to a crawl, and let some of the light escape. Now, turn off the laser. Watch. Does the entire column of light also disappear as the laser light is turned off? Yes, it does, unless Dr. Hau has seen otherwise.
AP
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 16:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off--
if the beam vanishes instantly-- even in the BEC medium and the escaping
beam post BEC
Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off-- if the beam vanishes instantly-- even in the BEC medium and the escaping beam post BEC
I do not know what Dr. Hau and her team believe in, whether you turn off the laser and not all the beam vanishes at the same time, or whether as I believe, the entire beam vanishes the instant the laser is turned off.
Of course, I have some supporting data-- called Quantum Mechanics Entanglement of the Bell Inequality. And the reason all the light vanishes the instant the laser is turned off, is because light waves are closed loops with the source as one of the links in this ellipse closed loop. So the instant the laser is turned off, causes all the light from that laser is turned off, even the light waves inside the BEC portion.
So, Dr. Hau, please take the challenge. Find out if the entire slowed light is instantly turned off as the laser is turned off. Perhaps you can set up some camera to record the turn-off.
AP
Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality
A torus shape doing the Faraday Law inside of each and every atom.
__
.-' `-.
.' ::\ ::|:: /:: `.
/ ::\::|::/:: \
; _ _ ;
| ( O ) |
; - - ;
\ ::/::|::\:: /
`. ::/ ::|:: \:: .'
`- _____ .-'
One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And
each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and
certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought because in New Physics
the interior of atoms has the Faraday law going on.
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 12:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Every science depends upon and is affected by our understanding of
the interior of atoms
Not until recently have I come to appreciate the fact that all sciences end up with their two major tenets, their foundation-- (1) matter is atoms, including the universe itself (2) how the interior of atoms works.
The years 1900 to 2019 was mostly the triumph of quantum mechanics, and few of us in science take time out to appreciate that quantum mechanics is basically the Rutherford-Bohr model of .5MeV particles jumping from lower to higher orbits or from higher to lower orbits around a massive dense small nucleus. That is quantum mechanics-- discrete orbits of .5MeV particles.
But in 2018, when that picture of the interior of atoms all changed with the AP Model-- the inside of atoms are protons at 840MeV as coils of ring windings forming toruses for the Faraday Law and the electron is muon of 105 MeV single ring as bar magnet in Faraday Law, with neutron as 945MeV as capacitor and skin of atom.
You see, all of science changed in 2018 with the new truer picture of the inside of atoms. Every science from physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, cosmology, medicine, physiology, ecology, you name it, all sciences changed with a new understanding of the interior of atoms.
One of the largest changes, to give the reader a sense of the vast changes, is that before 2018, everyone in science thought the Sun and stars shine by fusion. But that is not true, for every star and our Sun would go blinking dimmly if fusion caused stars to shine. What causes stars to shine is that every atom inside a star is doing the Faraday Law of its muons thrusting through its proton coil. You see, a muon rarely is ever pryed away from its proton, even in the hottest stars. And these muons thrusting through their attendant protons, creates the radiation of all stars.
It is fair to say, that unless we have all science based on Atomic Theory-- all matter is made up of atoms, including the Universe itself, and the second great idea-- the interior of atoms is doing electricity magnetism laws of Maxwell theory, then we are not really doing science at all.
And a sad sad shame, that few in science have a logical mind to be ever in science. For as the 20th century and this 21st century shows, the crippled in mind of science still chase after their fake delusional gravity, Big Bang, black holes and General Relativity-- deluded fools of science-- but that is where the pork-barrel welfare money science is at-- delusions.
This writing clip goes into my "advice to a science career". The who or what in science you are attracted to-- tells whether you are wasting your life in science.
AP
On Saturday, April 20, 2019 at 6:47:25 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in plutonium-atom-universe:
Actually, it feels as though knowing what the inside of an atom is all about is is just as important or more important than knowing the Atomic Fact that all matter is made of atoms.
AP
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 23:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: science is dependent on knowing the interior of atoms Re: Every
science depends upon and is affected by our understanding of the interior
of atoms
science is dependent on knowing the interior of atoms Re: Every science depends upon and is affected by our understanding of the interior of atoms
So yes, it is neat, and cool, very cool, that science, all sciences have to have the Atomic Fact-- all matter is made up of atoms, but then, equally important, is the interior of atoms, that there is a Faraday, Ampere, Gauss and AP-Maxwell laws going on, especially the Faraday Law.
And without knowing the correct interior of atoms, just simply destroys most of physics, chemistry, biology, you name it. Destroys it so badly, that we thought our Sun shines due to fusion, when in truth, it shines due to Faraday law of muons thrusting through proton coils in each and every atom of the Sun. We see this today in the Jupiter auroras, those beautiful blue auroras of Jupiter, are caused by the muons thrusting through the proton coils in those atoms on the north and south pole of Jupiter. Jupiter, because of its auroras is a baby-star, borne the moment those auroras started. And, it could well be, that Jupiter's auroras started in this century, and that if say Maxwell or Newton had a telescope as powerful as our new telescopes and looked at the poles of Jupiter in their century, would not have seen those lights because Jupiter was not a new borne star back then.
AP
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 01:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles--
punch tab speed
more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles// punch tab speed
In another thread I was drilling into the speed of light to make it more "common sense".
In that other thread I spoke of the two features of light
(1) the constancy of the speed, never going over, never going under the speed of 3*10^8 meters/second
(2) being the maximum speed of all speeds
So the speed of light or photons has two features that define it. A constancy speed and a maximum speed. And here I want to add more in understanding.
Now, think of a pencil on a piece of paper, and the speed of the pencil is distance/time. Whether the pencil draws a straight line or a circle or anything else, it is distance drawing divided by the time spent in doing the drawing. And this is how we think of speed in our life.
However, there is another form of speed. One that is unknown until now.
Recall those pieces of paper or cardboard where something is in the paper held together by two tiny tabs and where you punch out the figure with your finger.
Now imagine a light-wave or photon as being a closed loop, a line of force that is an ellipse and if we draw that ellipse on a piece of paper-- its speed is as normal of a speed as if we clocked a pencil going around in a ellipse. But, what if the light-wave or photon was one of these tabs inside the paper and the speed of the tab-ellipse is just the amount of time to punch that tab ellipse out of the paper and there we have a ellipse-- at the speed of light.
So, now we have two types of Speed, the drawing of the ellipse and the tab punched out ellipse. No drawing of the ellipse will ever reach 3*10^8 meters/second. But, every punched out ellipse can be 3*10^8 meters/second.
Now, this is all good and great, but unless I can provide what the tab and punch out is, it goes nowhere.
Fortunately I have the tab punch out. It is electricity which is perpendicular to magnetism. So the tab punch out is the finger but in EM, it is electricity and what the electricity produces in its punch of a "preexisting magnetic closed loop ellipse" is it produces this ellipse at the speed of light.
So, does that concept of tab punch out explain the two Principles of speed of light? Well, surely it does so, in aces it explains it. The speed of light is constant-- and the electricity punch is the same no matter what the size of the ellipse is-- punches all ellipses out at one constant number 3*10^8 meters/second.
The speed of light is a maximum speed. Does the punch have a greater speed in punching? Well, no, because the punch is electricity, and so for a faster than light speed means you have to have electricity faster than light speed, and this would be an ever faster progression contradiction, for electricity is dual to magnetism.
So, this punch tab gives common sense to a concept that seemed beyond common sense.
AP
On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 4:27:36 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in plutonium atom universe:
Punch tab speed//more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed
Now this concords beautifully with the concept that light waves are Wires. So we do not think of a speed of wire, but rather a speed traveling on or in a wire.
So when a photon is produced it is punched out of space as one complete ellipse of closed loop wire. It is punched out of Space by electricity and no matter the size, the punching is all the same as 3*10^8 meters/second.
AP
On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 12:21:03 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in plutonium-atom-universe :
explaining "slow light" better as a punch speed Re: Punch tab speed
Most people are not happy with the Old Physics explanation of "slow light", as you send light through a BEC. So let us examine if the "punch speed" can better explain this phenomenon.
On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 12:14:13 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Quoting Wikipedia:
A Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) is a state of matter of a dilute gas of bosons cooled to temperatures very close to absolute zero (-273.15 °C). Under such conditions, a large fraction of bosons occupy the lowest quantum state, at which point microscopic quantum phenomena, particularly wavefunction interference, become apparent macroscopically. A BEC is formed by cooling a gas of extremely low density, about one-hundred-thousandth the density of normal air, to ultra-low temperatures.
AP
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 11:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: explaining slow light as it enters BEC Re: explaining "slow light"
better as a punch speed Re: Punch tab speed
explaining slow light as it enters BEC Re: explaining "slow light" better as a punch speed Re: Punch tab speed
So now, the easiest answer to how light is slowed down, even though, for it to exist, it must always travel at a constant speed of 3*10^8 meters/second, the easiest explanation is that light has two distinct types of speed, the punch-speed and the variable common speed of distance/time.
So that as light enters water from air, it is bent and slowed down in a d/t speed, but light is also a punch speed which is the ellipse closed loop.
So, if we talk about light, it is punch speed of a tiny ellipse or huge ellipse-- all having that same constant punch speed. But, when we talk about that ellipse entering a different medium such as air to water or air to BEC, then that ellipse in total is having a d/t speed.
So the ellipse speed is speed of light, but the light itself can have a d/t speed.
If that is still troubling to understand, think of the light wave as the ellipse-- a ring, either tiny ring or large ring and it is going around in circle at the speed of light. But the entire whole ring has a speed that is common speed of d/t. In the ring itself, no matter if tiny or the size of the Cosmos, the ring itself is speed of light, but that entire ring has a secondary speed that is variable as d/t.
On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 12:21:03 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Most people are not happy with the Old Physics explanation of "slow light", as you send light through a BEC. So let us examine if the "punch speed" can better explain this phenomenon.
On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 12:14:13 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Quoting Wikipedia:
A Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) is a state of matter of a dilute gas of bosons cooled to temperatures very close to absolute zero (-273.15 °C). Under such conditions, a large fraction of bosons occupy the lowest quantum state, at which point microscopic quantum phenomena, particularly wavefunction interference, become apparent macroscopically. A BEC is formed by cooling a gas of extremely low density, about one-hundred-thousandth the density of normal air, to ultra-low temperatures.
AP
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 13:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: comparing punch-speed to d/t speed Re: more progress on the "speed
of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed
comparing punch-speed to d/t speed Re: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed
So, now, let me see if I can prove that the speed of light waves or photons, comes in two types of speed
1) the punch-speed of a full ellipse
2) common ordinary speed of distance/time designated as d/t
Now a human, a car, a rocket, a atom has only a d/t speed. You cannot get these objects at the speed of light for they would have infinite rest mass.
But a punch-speed, like I spoke of earlier is where you have say a cosmic cardboard of all various sizes and shapes of ellipses, each ellipse being a light wave or photon. Some are the size of the Cosmos, many are the size of a atom such as helium or tin or uranium. And each is held in place by two tiny tabs where you punch the ellipse and it comes out of the cardboard. The speed of light wave is a punch-speed. Same speed to punch out any and all of these ellipses. Whether the cosmic size ellipse or the microscopic ellipse, all require a punch that is 3*10^8 meters/second punch, and out they come.
So, when Danish physicist Lene Hau at Harvard turns on a laser light to shot into a BEC what her team is doing is turning on punched-speed ellipses of light waves. Each ellipse is the speed of light 3*10^8 meters/second that means the photon is traveling around that ellipse regardless of size of the traveling. But, these ellipses in space also have a d/t speed. A speed for the individual ellipse itself. So as each ellipse is moving in Space and encounters a BEC, that speed d/t of that ellipse varies and is slowed down in the new medium of BEC.
As Dr. Hau turns off the laser light, all the ellipses immediately go off, even those inside the BEC medium. Correct me if wrong, on that.
Likewise, you or I turning on a lightbulb. The light waves come out as ellipses and travel in space until they enter a different medium. Say the glass of water nearby the light bulb. As I turn the light off, all the light disappears into darkness, no matter how far away the light has travelled when "on". The instant I turn the bulb off, all the light is off.
What explains that instantaneous off and on? Even the light inside the glass of water which has been slowed down, turns off just as all the light from that bulb turns off.
What explains that? The explanation is that there are two speeds in the world-- the punch-speed and the d/t speed.
The punch-speed is an entire ellipse which is punched by electricity, and the ellipse is a magnetic monopole. The d/t speed is our common ordinary speed we are all familar with.
So as we turn the light off, all the light, even the slowed light inside the BEC is off at that very same instant of time. What explains that is the ellipses all disappear the moment the light is turned off. Regardless of the d/t speed.
AP
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 15:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t speed
Re: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch
tab speed
Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t speed Re: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed
You see, there is something gravely missing in Old Physics on Light Waves, sorely missing and troubling. Light is EM and all of EM has to be circuit to exist. Photons and light-wave cannot be open ended- but rather a closed loop. That means all light waves are ellipses and the moment a bulb is turned off is the moment all the light from that bulb is off, no matter how far away (quantum entanglement) or how close to the bulb yet moving slowly in BEC.
Light is a wave but a wave in a circuit of closed ellipse.
AP
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 19:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: name for punch-speed is angular speed and normal speed is linear
speed Re: Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t
speed
name for punch-speed is angular speed and normal speed is linear speed Re: Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t speed
On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 5:31:47 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
You see, there is something gravely missing in Old Physics on Light Waves, sorely missing and troubling. Light is EM and all of EM has to be circuit to exist. Photons and light-wave cannot be open ended- but rather a closed loop. That means all light waves are ellipses and the moment a bulb is turned off is the moment all the light from that bulb is off, no matter how far away (quantum entanglement) or how close to the bulb yet moving slowly in BEC.
Light is a wave but a wave in a circuit of closed ellipse.
And, in a very real sense, we can say that Quantum Entanglement of the Bell Inequality is the same thing as the practical fact that as you have a light on-- the waves travel the entire universe at the speed of light, but very moment you turn the light off-- those waves cease to exist also, no matter how far from the source or whether in a slowed medium, BEC.
Now I learned a valuable lesson with "charge", that when you pin a silly name to a concept, it holds back that science, hinders and cripples the science. Charge is really wire, and should have been named "wire".
So, I have two distinct speeds, the regular normal speed of distance/time and then the punch-speed of ellipses of no matter what size, they are punched out of Space, each and every one of them at the speed of light 3*10^8 meters/second. Now, I cannot call it punch-speed, for I need a name that fits in with other physics.
In momentum we have two types, the linear and the angular. So, in speeds we should have two distinct types. The normal regular type of d/t, but also the rather unfamilar punch-speed and it is related to angular momentum. This angular momentum speed is the perimeter of a ellipse and no matter the size of the ellipse perimeter, these angular speeds are all the same, for all of them are formed in 3*10^8 meter/second.
The linear speed is variable, but reach the speed of light nor exceed it. The angular speed is a constant, and cannot exceed that speed. All material matter has these two speeds, but the rest mass of objects forbids them from reaching the speed of light.
There is experimental proof of what I say above is true. I need it validated though, for I am not sure of the Hau experiments into slowed-light, that if you turn off the laser light, the slowed light disappears along with the unslowed light the moment the bulb is off. I am presuming this is the case. And if the case, then the fact that the moment any bulb is turned off, is the very instant that all the light that came from that bulb vanishes also. (This adds new meaning to Olber's paradox, of why is the night sky black when it has all those photons traveling. It is black because of Quantum Entanglement, that the moment a light source goes out, all the photons from that source disappear also. So there never was a chance that the Cosmos is so full of photons that it is no longer light.
AP
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 22:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Proof that light waves have two speeds, a linear speed of
distance/time and a angular speed of 3*10^8meters/second
Proof that light waves have two speeds, a linear speed of distance/time and a angular speed of 3*10^8meters/second
The proof is simple, take any laser light beam, the strongest you can build and shine it. The instant you turn it off, is the instant the entire column of angular speed light waves turn off also.
We can even see it in the laboratory where Dr. Hau at Harvard conducts "slowed down light experiments, running a laser light through BEC". The instant Dr. Hau turns off the light source, the entire column of light waves turns off also, even inside the BEC.
As for outer space, our best laser gets attenuated fast. But we can imagine a laser shone to Space where it is traveling to a far far away galaxy, and we turn the laser off. Even though light travels at 3^10^8 meters/second. That entire column of light from that laser disappears the very moment it is turned off, even though it is light years distance away, every photon or light wave is connected back to the source-- the laser flashlight, and the instant it is turned off, the entire beam disappears. This is quantum entanglement or the Bell Inequality. But my point is that light has two distinct speeds. One speed is linear and is what slows light in a BEC. But the other speed of light, is angular and it matters not on distance at all, but only on a fact of a closed circuit. A closed circuit that is induced by electricity and the speed of light is a line-of-force in Faraday's magnetic lines of force, a ellipse. This angular speed corresponds to angular momentum. Just as the variable linear speed corresponds to linear momentum.
This angular speed provides the puzzling "constant speed" and a "maximum speed". In order for 3*10^8 meters/second be both a constant and a maximum speed, the speed has to be angular. Remember-- linear momentum is not conserved. Angular Momentum is conserved. In order to conserve angular momentum, you need a angular speed that is both constant and a maximum.
All of that is proven by just one simple observation experiment-- run a laser through BEC, and slow light down to a crawl, and let some of the light escape. Now, turn off the laser. Watch. Does the entire column of light also disappear as the laser light is turned off? Yes, it does, unless Dr. Hau has seen otherwise.
AP
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 16:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
To: Plutonium Atom Universe <plutonium-atom-***@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off--
if the beam vanishes instantly-- even in the BEC medium and the escaping
beam post BEC
Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off-- if the beam vanishes instantly-- even in the BEC medium and the escaping beam post BEC
I do not know what Dr. Hau and her team believe in, whether you turn off the laser and not all the beam vanishes at the same time, or whether as I believe, the entire beam vanishes the instant the laser is turned off.
Of course, I have some supporting data-- called Quantum Mechanics Entanglement of the Bell Inequality. And the reason all the light vanishes the instant the laser is turned off, is because light waves are closed loops with the source as one of the links in this ellipse closed loop. So the instant the laser is turned off, causes all the light from that laser is turned off, even the light waves inside the BEC portion.
So, Dr. Hau, please take the challenge. Find out if the entire slowed light is instantly turned off as the laser is turned off. Perhaps you can set up some camera to record the turn-off.
AP
Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality
A torus shape doing the Faraday Law inside of each and every atom.
__
.-' `-.
.' ::\ ::|:: /:: `.
/ ::\::|::/:: \
; _ _ ;
| ( O ) |
; - - ;
\ ::/::|::\:: /
`. ::/ ::|:: \:: .'
`- _____ .-'
One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And
each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and
certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought because in New Physics
the interior of atoms has the Faraday law going on.
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium