Post by The PeelerOn Tue, 13 Aug 2019 06:03:24 -0700, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
Post by Grikboxxer®Âhttps://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49318300
What is WRONG with these subpeople?
<tsk>
Rather ask yourself, what is WRONG with you pedophilic gay dreckserb!
The mangina defies truth and morality.
Now here is Jack Marshall writing about Mike Brown.
https://ethicsalarms.com/2019/08/13/addendum-to-be-fair-elizabeth-warren-wasnt-the-only-democratic-presidential-candidate-who-lied-about-the-death-of-mike-brown-last-week-she-was-just-the-worst/
Addendum: To Be Fair, Elizabeth Warren Wasn’t The Only Democratic
Presidential Candidate Who Lied About The Death Of Mike Brown Last Week. She
Was Just The Worst…
AUGUST 13, 2019 / JACK MARSHALL
Last week, on Friday and Saturday, Democratic Presidential candidates
Elizabeth Warren, Rep. Tim Ryan, Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, Beto O’Rourke,
Kirsten Gillibrand, Bernie Sanders, and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio
all tweeted out deliberately false statements about the shooting of Michael
Brown in Fergusen, Missouri 5 years ago, all apparently doing so to pander
to African Americans, especially those who don’t read newspapers.
Ethics Alarms focused on Warren, being the biggest and most shameless
demagogue of the group, in this post, which concluded,
“Warren isn’t intellectually lazy, or flummoxed by a false narrative. She is
pandering. She is lying. She is doing what she evidently thinks will gain
her power and the Presidency: saying what she thinks will attract needed
support, even though she knows, knows, that it is false. Warren is a law
professor and a litigator, and from all reports skilled in both roles. She
knows that the facts made it obvious that Brown wasn’t murdered. She knows
that competent, fair citizens must not call other citizens murderers when
not only have they not been charged, tried, or duly convicted, but when
authorities have concluded that there is insufficient evidence for an
official accusation.The tweet isn’t a mistake or an opinion. It is a
deliberate lie, a public and a defamatory one. I see no reason why Darren
Wilson could not sue Warren and win.”
That is still accurate and true. Several Ethics Alarms readers pointed out
that Kamala Harris also advanced the long de-bunked narrative that Mike
Brown was a nice, friendly, “gentle giant” heading for college who was
gunned down by a racist cop while holding up his hands and pleading for his
life.
Harris, like Warren also a lawyer (and presciently runner-up to Warren in
the Ethics Alarms “Who is the most unethical Democratic candidate?” poll, as
you can see…
Whom among these Democratic candidates is the most unethical?
Elizabeth Warren
Kamala Harris
Beto O'Rourke
Cory Booker
Kirstsen Gillibrand
Bernie Sanders
Pete Buttigieg
Joe Biden
Vote
View ResultsCrowdsignal.com
…was almost as despicable as Warren, writing, “Michael Brown’s murder
forever changed Ferguson and America. His tragic death sparked a desperately
needed conversation and a nationwide movement. We must fight for stronger
accountability and racial equity in our justice system.”
As both Warren and Harris know, Mike Brown was NOT murdered, as both an
integrated grand jury and the Obama Justice Department found that the
forensic evidence and eye-witness reports corroborated Officer Wilson
account, meaning that he fired in self defense.
Harris and Warren, then, were lying, straight up. The other Democratic
hopefuls were just deliberately misleading, race-baiting, pandering and
inflammatory, falsely implying that the police officer was a racist and that
Brown was an innocent targeted for his color, the false narrative spun by
Brown’s family and Black Lives Matter. I doubt that any of them could be
sued for libel, because the framed their version of the false narrative with
sufficient deceit.
Cory Booker tweeted: “5 years ago, Michael Brown was killed by a police
officer … I have been thinking all day about Mike and his family, and my
prayers are with them. I am also thinking about the everyday citizens who
stood against this police violence and racism and were tear gassed for their
patriotic acts. Ferguson called to the conscience of our nation and inspired
a movement that rightly continues.”
Gillibrand : “5 years ago, a Ferguson police officer killed Michael Brown,
an unarmed teenager. He shot him 6 times. Nothing will bring Michael back,
but we can’t stop fighting the injustice done to his family and so many
others.”
Ryan: “Five years since the tragic death of Michael Brown and we still have
significant work to do. We must rebuild trust between police and the
communities they have sworn to protect.”
DeBlasio: “Michael Brown should be here today. My city knows the pain of
Ferguson all too well … NO ONE should die due to the color of their skin.”
I can’t let that one pass without noting what a weasel this guy is Brown
would be here today—maybe—if he didn’t resist a lawful arrest, didn’t try to
grab an officer’s gun, and didn’t charge Wilson with all of his 280 or so
pounds. Any white perp who behaved similarly while being built like a tank
would suffer the same fate, and deserve to.
Heeeeeere’s Beto! “Five years ago, Michael Brown was shot dead by a police
officer. … We are reminded of an idea as urgent, and as ignored, today as it
was when Michael was killed: Black Lives Matter.”
Bernie: “Michael Brown should be alive today. Five years after his death, we
must finally end police violence against people of color.”
This brazen servicing of an unquestionably false narrative isn’t even
getting the usual shrug and pass from the left-biased media, at least on
line, so indefensible is it all. FactCheck.org, perhaps the closest we have
to a fair factchecking service, focused on the two worst, Warren and Harris,
in its methodical take-down, but its analysis suffices for the rest. The
only part of the article that betrays the site’s bias is the headline,
“Harris, Warren Wrong About Brown Shooting,” as if they missed a press
release of something. Their lies were deliberate, not “mistakes.”
The Hill also flagged this mass mendacity—Did the DNC put out some kind of
official talking points for the Ferguson anniversary? Many of those tweets
are awfully similar—noting in part,
[T]he very candidates regularly accusing President Trump of being a liar and
divisive, of making claims “without evidence,” have made their own divisive,
false claims. Not only are these claims “without evidence,” they contradict
the evidence, according to the Obama Justice Department.
Oh good, I was about to make that point to my Facebook friends, who are so
obsessed with the “Trump lies all the time” trope that they post in outrage
every time the President utters or tweets a misstatement, botched fact,
exaggeration or garbled point, no matter how trivial.
Slate, usually a reliable apologist for any Democrat, especially one who
opposes Trump, went after Warren, was represented by long-time columnist
Will Saletan, who tweeted,
Sen. Warren, in this tweet you repeated a criminal accusation that was
refuted years ago by forensic evidence and an Obama DOJ report
(http://bit.ly/33mYgqB). Fact checkers have flagged your tweet and sought
comment from you. It’s 3 days later. Will you retract the accusation?
No, she hasn’t, and won’t. The rest won’t either. This mass dishonesty in
the service of racial division was even too much for Vox, which also
reviewed the Brown shooting facts, and also, like Factcheck, minimized the
offense by calling the Harris and Warren tweets “controversial” while
implying that those and the others were mistakes, writing, “Five years after
the shooting, though, major presidential campaigns are still getting the
details wrong.”
What a coincidence!
Notably missing from the Parade of False Tweeters were Pete Buttigieg, who
is embroiled in a police involved shooting controversy of his own in South
Bend and had the sense to take a pass, and Joe Biden, who may have dropped
that DNC talking points memo in the sink or something.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com