DIARY NOTE @ 1252 HOURS ON 17 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I had to call the police
due to an instance of menacing and irrational conduct as alleged
breaches to an INTERVENTION ORDER which are subject to an appeal
AP-18-0775 and there was a woman loitering some 80 metres away within
the park area who I couldn't readily distinguish and whom the police
later identified as the MARION STATUE ARTIST that I had discoursed with
@ 1739 / 1747 HOURS ON MONDAY 28 MAY 2018. I had in point of fact not
spoken to her at all today and yet it was being improperly being alleged
that I had upon this day ambushed, harangued and verbalised her over
some absurd impetus of 'SAVING THE WORLD'.
FOR ARTIST DIALOG SEE VINEGARETTE: "THE SHIP OF STATE (HEBREW STOICHEION
AND IT'S EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 METAPHOR) IS IN DEEP
WATER" dated 5 September 2018
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/4%20Vinegarette%2020180909.pdf>
And I castigated the police for engaging within falsehoods as I hadn't
been in proximity to that person as the timestamp of my photograph and
time of telephone call convey."
Post by Government Shill #2On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 20:33:33 -0700 (PDT), Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul� IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO SEEK COURT PROTECTION FROM THESE NEO-NAZI
RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE (RSL) AND ROMAN CATHOLIC WELLINGTON SHIRE
COUNCILLORS
"Your Honour, I would like to apply for 24/7 round-the-clock police protection to protect me from the SALE RSL employees and council employees, and their spouses while I mercilessly stalk them all around town"
"Lock him up!"
Unfortunately, with the piss poor courts and the piss poor mental health system
we have in this country, he will have to seriously hurt some innocent person
before anything is done.
Shill #2
--
Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
theobviousgcashman
-- RUSSIAN #312 - CONTRADICTION ON NOVICHOK POISONING BY #274 - PERFUMY
/ KANT'S PROLEGOMENA UPON TRINOMIAL NOUMENON (DUTCH BARBARISM: GEERT BE
WILDERS BLAAST CARTOONWEDSTRIJD AF)
(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 17 September, 2018
YOUTUBE: "Adventure Of A Lifetime (Coldplay)"
"Give ear, O my people, to my law: incline your ears to the words of my
mouth. I will open my mouth in a parable: I will utter dark sayings of
old: Which we have heard and known, and our fathers have told us. We
will not hide them from their children, showing to the generation to
come the praises of the LORD, and his strength, and his wonderful works
that he hath done. For he established a testimony in Jacob {THAT
SUPPLANTS, UNDERMINES; THE HEEL}, and appointed a law in Israel {WHO
PREVAILS WITH GOD}, which he commanded our fathers, that they should
make them known to their children: That the generation to come might
know them, even the children which should be born; who should arise and
declare them to their children: That they might set their hope in God,
and not forget the works of God, but keep his commandments: And might
not be as their fathers, a stubborn and rebellious generation; a
generation that set not their heart aright, and whose spirit was not
stedfast with God." [Psalm 78:1-8 (KJV)]
VERONICA STRACQUALURSI (CNN) @ 0805 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018:
"Washington: Former President Barack Obama lauded John McCain's efforts
to push the nation to rise above "*MEAN* *AND* *PETTY*" politics in his
tribute Saturday 1 September 2018 to the Arizona Republican, who served
for more than three decades in the Senate.
"SO MUCH OF OUR POLITICS, OUR PUBLIC LIFE, OUR PUBLIC DISCOURSE CAN SEEM
SMALL AND *MEAN* *AND* *PETTY*, TRAFFICKING IN BOMBAST AND INSULT, AND
PHONEY CONTROVERSIES, AND MANUFACTURED OUTRAGE. IT'S A POLITICS THAT
PRETENDS TO BE BRAVE AND TOUGH, BUT IN FACT IS BORN OF FEAR {
FEAR@{
@1: Sup: 14 (#14); Ego: 14 (#14),
@2: Sup: 3 (#17); Ego: 70 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 5 (#22); Ego: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#35); Ego: 8 (#94),
@5: Sup: 22 (#57); Ego: 9 (#103),
@6: Sup: 30 (#87); Ego: 8 (#111),
@7: Sup: 6 (#93); Ego: 57 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
@8: Sup: 11 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 5 (#173 - I AM
NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
Male: #104; Feme: #173
} // #902
#902 as [#500, #70, #2, #8, #9, #8, #300, #5] = phobetron (G5400): 1)
Neuter of a derivative of φοβέω; a frightening thing, ie. terrific
portent:--fearful sight
}," OBAMA SAID IN A EULOGY FOR MCCAIN AT A MEMORIAL SERVICE AT
WASHINGTON NATIONAL CATHEDRAL. "JOHN CALLED ON US TO BE BIGGER THAN
THAT. HE CALLED ON US TO BE BETTER THAN THAT."
H2000@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 21 (#43); Ego: 5 (#21),
@4: Sup: 61 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 40 (#61),
@5: Sup: 13 (#117); Ego: 33 (#94),
Male: #117; Feme: #94
} // #101
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #101 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;
THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; *I* *COMMIT* *NOT* *ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.
#VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
#TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
#POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
#TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
#CANON: #180
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
@1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
@2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
@3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
@4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
Male: #135; Feme: #180
} // #180
#101 as [#6, #10, #5, #40, #600] = hamam (H2000): {UMBRA: #36 as #101 %
#41 = #19} 1) to move noisily, confuse, make a noise, discomfit, break,
*CONSUME*, *CRUSH*, *DESTROY*, *TROUBLE*, *VEX*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to move
noisily; 1a2) *TO* *CONFUSE*, *DISCOMFIT*, *VEX*;
<
Loading Image...
>
[IMAGE: This CARTOON is supposed to be a characterisation (Dutch Raven /
Hitler / Napoleon Emperor) named dolf as being either the Dutch
politician GEERT BE WILDERS or of myself.
The fraternity PI (#80) KAPPA (#20) ALPHA (#1) = (#101) best known for
raping girls.
The most bad ass fraternity ever. A lot of alpha males that drag their
balls 🎱 🏈⚾️ behind them as they walk to class if they go.
They enjoy dirty house music more then anything else. Especially the
ZETA GAMMA chapter
#492 - *VOLUNTARY* *FREEWILL* {#41 = #12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} -
#391 - *HOMOIOS* *FRATERNITY* =
#101 - #KORPPIONOIKEUS AS ANY VEXATION MEANING: 'THE #260 - RAVEN / RAPE
IS RIGHT'
MANDALAY_SWAY@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
@4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
@5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
@6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
@7: Sup: 60 (#201); Ego: 8 (#60),
@8: Sup: 17 (#218 - *OR* *DEATH* *ITS* *SWAY*); Ego: 38 (#98),
Male: #218; Feme: #98
}
YOUTUBE: "[OFFICIAL VIDEO] Bohemian Rhapsody – Pentatonix"
#260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
#60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
*COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
SEE ALSO: "REFUTATION OF SCORN: IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF
PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.6%20A%20METHODOLOGICAL%20NEW%20BEGINNING.pdf>
And is considered by some to be the tag line for a globalist campaign of
criminalised amorality of *PIKE* as having a violent psychosexual as
malice aforethought against the dignity and person of another]
YOUTUBE: "The Bad Touch (Bloodhound Gang)"
HOWEVER [JOHN MCCAIN] UNDERSTOOD THAT SOME PRINCIPLES {
PRINCIPLES@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 20 (#21); Ego: 19 (#20),
@3: Sup: 53 (#74); Ego: 33 (#53),
@4: Sup: 54 (#128); Ego: 1 (#54),
@5: Sup: 11 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%13}); Ego: 38 (#92),
Male: #139; Feme: #92
}
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #712 % #41 = #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of
Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning;
Tetra: 1 - Centre;
THOTH MEASURE: #15 - Oh Lord of Righteousness, who makest thine
appearance in the place of Righteousness; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A*
*LAND*-*GRABBER*.
#VIRTUE: With Reach (no. #15), dailys increasing its kind.
#TOOLS: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily depleting its type.
#POSITION: With Resistance (no. #22), intolerance, but
#TIME: With Unity (no. #54), magnanimity.
#CANON: #146
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_146@{
@1: Sup: 15 (#15); Ego: 15 (#15),
@2: Sup: 70 (#85); Ego: 55 (#70),
@3: Sup: 11 (#96); Ego: 22 (#92),
@4: Sup: 65 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 54 (#146 -
I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
Male: #161; Feme: #146
} // #146
#902 as [#1, #100, #600, #1, #200] = arche (G746): {#44 as #712 % #41 =
#15} 1) beginning, origin; 2) the person or thing that commences, the
first person or thing in a series, the leader; 3) that by which anything
begins to be, the origin, the active cause; 4) the extremity of a thing;
5) *THE* *FIRST* *PLACE*, *PRINCIPALITY*, *RULE*, *MAGISTRACY*; 4a) of
the corners of a sail; 5a) of angels and demons;
} TRANSCEND POLITICS, THAT SOME VALUES TRANSCEND PARTY. HE CONSIDERED IT
PART OF HIS DUTY TO UPHOLD THOSE PRINCIPLES AND UPHOLD THOSE VALUES.
JOHN CARED ABOUT THE INSTITUTIONS OF SELF-GOVERNMENT, OUR CONSTITUTION,
OUR BILL OF RIGHTS, *RULE* *OF* *LAW* {#22 x #41 = #902}, SEPARATION OF
POWERS, EVEN THE ARCANE RULES AND PROCEDURES OF THE SENATE. HE KNEW THAT
IN A NATION AS BIG AND BOISTEROUS AND DIVERSE AS OURS, THOSE
INSTITUTIONS, THOSE RULES, THOSE NORMS ARE WHAT BIND US TOGETHER {
7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
*WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*
}. THEY GIVE *SHAPE* {
H1254@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 7 (#12); Ego: 2 (#7),
@3: Sup: 45 (#57); Ego: 38 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
@4: Sup: 46 (#103); Ego: 1 (#46),
@5: Sup: 79 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
Ego: 33 (#79),
Male: #182; Feme: #79
} // #248 <-- MAIS NOUS FAISONS DE NOTRE MIEUX
#248 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #40] / #808 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #600] =
bara' (H1254): {#0 as #248 % #41 = #2} 1) to create, shape, form; 2) to
be fat; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *SHAPE*, *FASHION*, *CREATE* (*ALWAYS* *WITH*
*GOD* *AS* *SUBJECT*); 1a1) of heaven and earth; 1a2) of individual man;
1a3) of new conditions and circumstances; 1a4) of transformations; 1b)
(Niphal) to be created; 1b1) of heaven and earth; 1b2) of birth; 1b3) of
something new; 1b4) of miracles; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) *TO* *CUT* *DOWN*;
1c2) *TO* *CUT* *OUT*; 2a) (Hiphil) to make yourselves fat;
} AND ORDER TO OUR COMMON LIFE, EVEN WHEN WE DISAGREE. ESPECIALLY WHEN
WE DISAGREE.
JOHN BELIEVED IN HONEST ARGUMENT AND HEARING OTHER VIEWS. HE UNDERSTOOD
THAT IF WE GET IN THE HABIT OF BENDING THE TRUTH TO SUIT POLITICAL
EXPEDIENCY OR PARTY ORTHODOXY, OUR DEMOCRACY WILL NOT WORK. THAT'S WHY
HE WAS WILLING TO BUCK HIS OWN PARTY AT TIMES, OCCASIONALLY WORK ACROSS
THE AISLE ON CAMPAIGN-FINANCE REFORM AND IMMIGRATION REFORM. THAT'S WHY
HE CHAMPIONED A FREE AND INDEPENDENT PRESS AS VITAL TO OUR DEMOCRATIC
DEBATE. AND THE FACT THAT IT EARNED HIM SOME GOOD COVERAGE DIDN'T HURT
EITHER.
JOHN UNDERSTOOD, AS JFK UNDERSTOOD, AS RONALD REAGAN UNDERSTOOD, THAT
PART OF WHAT MAKES OUR COUNTRY GREAT IS THAT OUR MEMBERSHIP IS BASED NOT
ON OUR BLOODLINE, NOT ON WHAT WE LOOK LIKE, WHAT OUR LAST NAMES ARE,
IT'S NOT BASED ON WHERE OUR PARENTS OR GRANDPARENTS CAME FROM, OR HOW
RECENTLY THEY ARRIVED, BUT ON ADHERENCE TO A COMMON CREED: *THAT* *ALL*
*OF* *US* *ARE* *CREATED* *EQUAL*, *ENDOWED* {#492 - *FREEDOM* *OF*
*WILL* / #41 = #12 as #9 - Autonomous Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL*
*NECESSITY*} *BY* *OUR* *CREATOR* {
COVENANT@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
@4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
@5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
@6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
@7: Sup: 42 (#183); Ego: 71 (#123),
@8: Sup: 11 (#194); Ego: 50 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL
LUST {%27}),
Male: #194; Feme: #173
}
#902 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #800, #50] / #260 as [#4, #10, #1,
#9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a
disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one wishes to be valid, the
last disposition which one makes of his earthly possessions after his
death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A* *COVENANT*, *A*
*TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
} *WITH* *CERTAIN* *INALIENABLE* *RIGHTS* {
THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of*
*priests* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated
to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = #2184 days;
THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of
20 March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.
THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: REMEMBER
THE SABBATH DAY TO KEEP IT HOLY {ACT TO WILL V'S WILL TO ACT}
#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE +
#728 - REACTANCE +
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13}
H6843@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 14 (#19); Ego: 9 (#14),
@3: Sup: 13 (#32); Ego: 80 (#94),
@4: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 10 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@5: Sup: 61 (#116); Ego: 38 (#142),
@6: Sup: 66 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
Ego: 5 (#147),
Male: #182; Feme: #147
} // #390
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #385 % #41 = #16 - Being a Guide, Returning to the Root; I-Ching:
H28 - Major Superiority, Excess, Great Exceeding, Preponderance of the
great, Critical mass; Tetra: 75 - Failure;
THOTH MEASURE: #16 - Oh thou who turnest backwards, who makest thine
appearance in Bubastis; *I* *AM* *NOT* *AN* *EAVES*-*DROPPER*.
#VIRTUE: Contact (no. #16) means mutual compliance.
#TOOLS: Closed Mouth (no. #56) means no contact.
#POSITION: With Increase (no. #13), daily additions, but
#TIME: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily reductions.
#CANON: #140
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_140@{
@1: Sup: 16 (#16); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 72 (#88); Ego: 56 (#72),
@3: Sup: 4 (#92); Ego: 13 (#85),
@4: Sup: 59 (#151); Ego: 55 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} /
I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #151; Feme: #140
} // #140
#390 as [#5, #90, #80, #10, #200, #5] = tsephiyrah (H6843): {#8 as #385
% #41 = #16} 1) plait, chaplet, *WREATH*, *CROWN*; 1a) plait, coronet,
*DIADEM*;
G727@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 20 (#21); Ego: 19 (#20),
@3: Sup: 19 (#40); Ego: 80 (#100),
@4: Sup: 20 (#60); Ego: 1 (#101),
@5: Sup: 23 (#83); Ego: 3 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@6: Sup: 28 (#111); Ego: 5 (#109),
@7: Sup: 66 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 38 (#147),
Male: #177; Feme: #147
} // #390
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #242 % #41 = #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration;
I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21
- Release;
THOTH MEASURE: #37 - Oh Striker, who makest thine appearance in Heaven;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *LOUD* *VOICE*.
#VIRTUE: Purity (no. #37) means the Way of the ruler.
#TOOLS: Compliance (no. #77) means the subject’s preservation.
#POSITION: With Penetration (no. #14), a sharp advance.
#TIME: With Dimming (no. #68), an impeded walk.
#CANON: #196
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_196@{
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 37 (#37),
@2: Sup: 33 (#70); Ego: 77 (#114),
@3: Sup: 47 (#117); Ego: 14 (#128),
@4: Sup: 34 (#151); Ego: 68 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
Male: #151; Feme: #196
} // #196
#390 as [#1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200] = harpax (G727): {UMBRA: #11
as #242 % #41 = #37} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) *A* *EXTORTIONER*, *A*
*ROBBER*;
}. IT HAS BEEN MENTIONED TODAY, AND WE'VE SEEN FOOTAGE THIS WEEK JOHN
PUSHING BACK AGAINST SUPPORTERS WHO CHALLENGED MY PATRIOTISM DURING THE
2008 CAMPAIGN. I WAS GRATEFUL, BUT I WASN'T SURPRISED. AS JOE LIEBERMAN
SAID, THAT WAS JOHN'S INSTINCT. I NEVER SAW JOHN TREAT ANYONE
DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE OF THEIR RACE OR RELIGION OR GENDER. AND I'M CERTAIN
THAT IN THOSE MOMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN REFERRED TO DURING THE CAMPAIGN, HE
SAW HIMSELF AS DEFENDING AMERICA'S CHARACTER, NOT JUST MINE. FOR HE
CONSIDERED IT THE IMPERATIVE OF EVERY CITIZEN WHO LOVES THIS COUNTRY TO
TREAT ALL PEOPLE FAIRLY.
AND FINALLY, WHILE JOHN AND I DISAGREED ON ALL KINDS OF FOREIGN-POLICY
ISSUES, WE STOOD TOGETHER ON AMERICA'S ROLE AS THE ONE INDISPENSABLE
NATION, BELIEVING THAT WITH GREAT POWER AND GREAT BLESSINGS COMES GREAT
RESPONSIBILITY. THAT BURDEN IS BORNE MOST HEAVILY BY OUR MEN AND WOMEN
IN UNIFORM, SERVICE MEMBERS LIKE DOUG, JIMMY, AND JACK WHO FOLLOWED
THEIR FATHER'S FOOTSTEPS, AS WELL AS THE FAMILIES WHO SERVE ALONGSIDE
OUR TROOPS. BUT JOHN UNDERSTOOD THAT OUR SECURITY AND OUR INFLUENCE WAS
WON NOT JUST BY OUR MILITARY MIGHT, NOT JUST BY OUR WEALTH, NOT JUST BY
OUR ABILITY TO BEND OTHERS TO OUR WILL {#9 x #41 = #369}, BUT FROM OUR
CAPACITY TO INSPIRE OTHERS WITH OUR ADHERENCE TO A SET OF UNIVERSAL
VALUES, LIKE *RULE* *OF* *LAW* {#22 x #41 = #902} *AND* *HUMAN* *RIGHTS*
{#12 x #41 = #492 as #9 - Autonomous Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL*
*NECESSITY*}, AND AN INSISTENCE ON THE GOD-GIVEN DIGNITY OF EVERY HUMAN
BEING.
OF COURSE, JOHN WAS THE FIRST TO TELL US THAT HE WAS NOT PERFECT. LIKE
ALL OF US WHO GO INTO PUBLIC SERVICE, HE DID HAVE AN EGO. LIKE ALL OF
US, THERE WAS NO DOUBT SOME VOTES HE CAST, SOME COMPROMISES HE STRUCK,
SOME DECISIONS HE MADE THAT HE WISHED HE COULD HAVE BACK. IT'S NO
SECRET—IT'S BEEN MENTIONED—THAT HE HAD A TEMPER, AND WHEN IT FLARED UP,
IT WAS A FORCE OF NATURE, A WONDER TO BEHOLD. HIS JAW GRINDING, HIS FACE
REDDENING, HIS EYES BORING A HOLE RIGHT THROUGH YOU—NOT THAT I EVER
EXPERIENCED IT FIRSTHAND, MIND YOU. BUT TO KNOW JOHN WAS TO KNOW THAT AS
QUICK AS HIS PASSIONS MIGHT FLARE, HE WAS JUST AS QUICK TO FORGIVE AND
ASK FOR FORGIVENESS. HE KNEW MORE THAN MOST HIS OWN FLAWS, AND HIS BLIND
SPOTS, AND HE KNEW HOW TO LAUGH AT HIMSELF. AND THAT SELF-AWARENESS MADE
HIM ALL THE MORE COMPELLING.
WE DIDN'T ADVERTISE IT, BUT EVERY SO OFTEN OVER THE COURSE {
COURSE@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 80 (#110); Ego: 50 (#80),
@3: Sup: 75 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
76 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
@4: Sup: 4 (#189); Ego: 10 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
@5: Sup: 6 (#195); Ego: 2 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
@6: Sup: 1 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 76 (#244),
@7: Sup: 11 (#207); Ego: 10 (#254),
Male: #207; Feme: #254
}
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #462 % #41 = #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching:
H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance;
Tetra: 33 - Closeness;
THOTH MEASURE: #11 - Oh thou of the Two Caverns, who makest thine
appearance in Amenta; *I* *AM* *NOT* *SLUGGISH*.
#VIRTUE: Divergence (no. #11) means mistakes, but
#TOOLS: Constancy (no. #51) is good.
#POSITION: With Joy (no. #24), calm and composure.
#TIME: With Labouring (no. #80), hustle and bustle.
#CANON: #166
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_166@{
@1: Sup: 11 (#11); Ego: 11 (#11),
@2: Sup: 62 (#73); Ego: 51 (#62),
@3: Sup: 5 (#78); Ego: 24 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@4: Sup: 4 (#82); Ego: 80 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
Male: #82; Feme: #166
} // #166
#902 as [#30, #50, #400, #10, #2, #400, #10] / #467 as [#50, #400, #10,
#2, #5] = nathiyb (H5410): {#7 as #462 % #41 = #11} 1) *TRODDEN* *WITH*
*THE* *FEET*, *PATH*, *PATHWAY*; 2) path, pathway, traveller;
} OF MY PRESIDENCY, JOHN WOULD COME OVER TO THE WHITE HOUSE AND WE'D
JUST SIT AND TALK IN THE OVAL OFFICE, JUST THE TWO OF US. AND WE'D TALK
ABOUT POLICY AND WE'D TALK ABOUT FAMILY AND WE'D TALK ABOUT THE STATE OF
OUR POLITICS. AND OUR DISAGREEMENTS DIDN'T GO AWAY DURING THESE PRIVATE
CONVERSATIONS. THOSE WERE REAL AND THEY WERE OFTEN DEEP.
BUT WE ENJOYED {
JOY@{
@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 33 (#33),
@2: Sup: 34 (#67); Ego: 1 (#34),
@3: Sup: 53 (#120); Ego: 19 (#53),
@4: Sup: 54 (#174); Ego: 1 (#54),
@5: Sup: 11 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
38 (#92),
Male: #185; Feme: #92
}
#902 as [#600, #1, #100#1, #200] = chara (G5479): {#25 as #702 % #41 =
#5} 1) joy, gladness; 1a) the joy received from you; 1b) the cause or
occasion of joy; 1b1) *OF* *PERSONS* *WHO* *ARE* *ONE'S* *JOY*;
YOUTUBE: "Joy to the World (Mormon Tabernacle Choir)"
http://youtu.be/DLT9dSt8cwg
} THE TIME WE SHARED AWAY FROM THE BRIGHT LIGHTS {
LIGHT@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 53 (#54); Ego: 52 (#53),
@3: Sup: 54 (#108); Ego: 1 (#54),
@4: Sup: 11 (#119); Ego: 38 (#92),
Male: #119; Feme: #92
} // #902
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #109 % #41 = #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
Closure;
THOTH MEASURE: #27 - Oh thou whose face is behind thee, and who makest
thine appearance at thy cavern; *I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *UNNATURAL*
*LUST*.
#VIRTUE: With Duties (no. #27), esteem for activity.
#TOOLS: With Darkening (no. #67), esteem for rest.
#POSITION: With Mired (no. #3), plucked out from calamity.
#TIME: With Aggravation (no. #76), lacking any pardons.
#CANON: #173
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_173@{
@1: Sup: 27 (#27); Ego: 27 (#27),
@2: Sup: 13 (#40); Ego: 67 (#94),
@3: Sup: 16 (#56); Ego: 3 (#97),
@4: Sup: 11 (#67); Ego: 76 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
{%27}),
Male: #67; Feme: #173
} // #173
LIGHT@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 53 (#54); Ego: 52 (#53),
@3: Sup: 54 (#108); Ego: 1 (#54),
@4: Sup: 11 (#119); Ego: 38 (#92),
Male: #119; Feme: #92
}
#902 as [#1, #700, #1, #200] = hapto (G681): {#0 as #396 % #41 = #27} 1)
A primary verb; properly, to fasten to, ie. (specially) to set on
fire:--kindle, light
}. AND WE LAUGHED WITH EACH OTHER. AND WE LEARNED FROM EACH OTHER. AND
WE NEVER DOUBTED THE OTHER MAN'S SINCERITY OR THE OTHER MAN'S
PATRIOTISM, OR THAT WHEN ALL WAS SAID AND DONE, WE WERE ON THE SAME
TEAM. WE NEVER DOUBTED WE WERE ON THE SAME TEAM. FOR ALL OF OUR
DIFFERENCES, WE SHARED A FIDELITY TO THE IDEALS FOR WHICH GENERATIONS OF
AMERICANS HAVE MARCHED AND FOUGHT AND SACRIFICED AND GIVEN THEIR LIVES.
WE CONSIDERED OUR POLITICAL BATTLES A PRIVILEGE, AN OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE
AS STEWARDS OF THOSE IDEALS HERE AT HOME AND TO DO OUR BEST TO ADVANCE
THEM AROUND THE WORLD. WE SAW THIS COUNTRY AS A PLACE WHERE ANYTHING IS
POSSIBLE, AND CITIZENSHIP IS AN OBLIGATION TO ENSURE IT FOREVER REMAINS
THAT WAY.
AND MORE THAN ONCE DURING HIS CAREER, JOHN DREW COMPARISONS TO TEDDY
ROOSEVELT. AND I AM SURE IT HAS BEEN NOTED THAT ROOSEVELT'S "MAN IN THE
ARENA" ORATION SEEMS TAILORED TO JOHN. MOST OF YOU KNOW IT. ROOSEVELT
SPEAKS OF THOSE WHO STRIVE, WHO DARE TO DO GREAT THINGS, WHO SOMETIMES
WIN AND SOMETIMES COME UP SHORT, BUT ALWAYS RELISH A GOOD FIGHT—A
CONTRAST TO THOSE COLD, TIMID SOULS {
SOUL@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 49 (#99); Ego: 80 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
@3: Sup: 25 (#124); Ego: 57 (#187),
@4: Sup: 31 (#155); Ego: 6 (#193),
@5: Sup: 26 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}); Ego: 76
(#269),
@6: Sup: 36 (#217); Ego: 10 (#279),
@7: Sup: 5 (#222); Ego: 50 (#329),
@8: Sup: 11 (#233); Ego: 6 (#335),
Male: #233; Feme: #335
}
#902 as [#50, #80, #300, #6, #400, #10, #50, #6] = nephesh (H5315): {#18
as #430 % #41 = #20} 1) *SOUL*, *SELF*, *LIFE*, *CREATURE*, *PERSON*,
*APPETITE*, *MIND*, *LIVING* *BEING*, *DESIRE*, *EMOTION*, *PASSION*;
1a) that which breathes, the breathing substance or being, soul, the
inner being of man; 1b) living being; 1c) living being (with life in the
blood); 1d) the man himself, self, person or individual; 1e) seat of the
appetites; 1f) seat of emotions and passions; 1g) activity of mind; 1g1)
dubious; 1h) activity of the will; 1h1) dubious; 1i) activity of the
character; 1i1) dubious;
} WHO KNOW NEITHER VICTORY NOR DEFEAT. ISN'T THAT THE SPIRIT WE
CELEBRATE THIS WEEK? THAT STRIVING TO BE BETTER, TO DO BETTER, TO BE
WORTHY OF THE GREAT INHERITANCE {
INHERITANCE@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 50 (#70); Ego: 30 (#50),
@3: Sup: 58 (#128); Ego: 8 (#58),
@4: Sup: 77 (#205); Ego: 19 (#77),
@5: Sup: 66 (#271); Ego: 70 (#147),
@6: Sup: 35 (#306); Ego: 50 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
@7: Sup: 24 (#330); Ego: 70 (#267),
@8: Sup: 64 (#394); Ego: 40 (#307),
@9: Sup: 72 (#466); Ego: 8 (#315),
@10: Sup: 29 (#495); Ego: 38 (#353),
@11: Sup: 30 (#525); Ego: 1 (#354),
@12: Sup: 6 (#531); Ego: 57 (#411),
@13: Sup: 11 (#542); Ego: 5 (#416),
Male: #542; Feme: #416
}
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #614 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;
THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy
cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *UNJUST* *PREFERENCES*.
#VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
#TOOLS: Labouring (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite
strenuous efforts.
#POSITION: With Duties (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
#TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
#CANON: #228
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
@3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
@4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
Male: #211; Feme: #228
} // #228
#902 as [#20, #30, #8, #100, #70, #50, #70, #40, #8, #200, #1, #300, #5]
= kleronomeo (G2816): {#31 as #614 % #41 = #40} 1) to receive a lot,
receive by lot; 2) to receive the portion assigned to one, receive an
allotted portion, receive as one's own or as a possession; 3) to become
partaker of, to obtain; 1a) esp. to receive a part of an inheritance,
receive as an inheritance, *OBTAIN* *BY* *RIGHT* *OF* *INHERITANCE*; 1b)
to be an heir, to inherit;
} THAT OUR FOUNDERS BESTOWED.
TODAY IS ONLY ONE DAY IN ALL THE DAYS THAT WILL EVER BE. BUT WHAT WILL
HAPPEN IN ALL THE OTHER DAYS THAT WILL EVER COME CAN DEPEND ON WHAT YOU
DO TODAY." WHAT BETTER WAY TO HONOR JOHN MCCAIN'S LIFE OF SERVICE THAN,
AS BEST WE CAN, FOLLOW HIS EXAMPLE. TO PROVE THAT THE WILLINGNESS TO GET
IN THE ARENA AND FIGHT FOR THIS COUNTRY IS NOT RESERVED FOR THE FEW, IT
IS OPEN TO ALL OF US, AND IN FACT IT IS DEMANDED OF ALL OF US AS
CITIZENS OF THIS GREAT REPUBLIC. THAT'S PERHAPS HOW WE HONOR HIM BEST,
BY RECOGNIZING THAT THERE ARE SOME THINGS BIGGER THAN PARTY OR AMBITION
OR MONEY OR FAME OR POWER. THAT THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT ARE WORTH
RISKING EVERYTHING FOR: PRINCIPLES THAT ARE ETERNAL, TRUTHS THAT ARE
ABIDING. AT HIS BEST, JOHN SHOWED US WHAT THAT MEANS. FOR THAT, WE ARE
ALL DEEPLY IN HIS DEBT.
MAY GOD BLESS JOHN MCCAIN. MAY GOD BLESS THIS COUNTRY HE SERVED SO WELL.
<https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/01/politics/obama-eulogy-john-mccain-funeral/index.html>
3. THE METHOD AND THE RELATION OF THE GROUNDWORK TO THE METAPHYSICS OF
MORALS (GMS, 391,16-392)
At this point, Kant departs from his general reflections on a theory to
be provided “SOMEDAY” (GMS, 391,16) and dedicates himself to the work
that follows. His remarks are extremely terse and without a total
interpretation of the Groundwork almost impossible to comprehend. In
particular, his comments on the method he uses are hardly understandable
for a reader who is not already familiar with the work. [Horn &
Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 16]
DOLF @ 2012 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "There is the analytic/synthetic
distinction and the a priori/a posteriori distinction. These two
distinctions form four types of knowledge:
#1) ANALYTIC A PRIORI
#2) SYNTHETIC A PRIORI
#3) ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI
#4) SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI
According to the facsimile of the 1687 edition on the History of
Philosophy / Pythagoras and His Life Teachings, Hebrews express this
ANALYTIC A PRIORI by a Point, which mark (as well amongst the
Barbarians, as in Latin) denotes One. Hitherto allude the Pythagorean
symbols One and Two. Zaratas (the Master of Pythagoras) used these as
the names of propagation—one the father; two the mother. One and two (in
the divine essence) producing four, the TETRACTYS, the idea of all
things, which are consummated in the number Ten. This Pythagoras styles:
Eternal Nature's fountain—
This is the *KNOWLEDGE* *OF* *THINGS* *IN* *THE* *DIVINE* *MIND*
*OPERATING* *INTELLECTUALLY*. From this fountain of Eternal Nature,
flows down the Pythagorean numbers *ONE* and *TWO*--which from Eternity,
in the fountain of the immense Ocean, was, shall be, or rather always
is, abundantly streaming. This *ONE* was by the Ancients termed [“Zeus”]
as Jupiter; *TWO* as [“Hera”]
G1520@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 55 (#60); Ego: 50 (#55),
@3: Sup: 44 (#104); Ego: 70 (#125),
@4: Sup: 1 (#105); Ego: 38 (#163),
Male: #105; Feme: #163
} // #325
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #215 % #41 = #10 - Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?; I-Ching:
H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net; Tetra:
41 - Response;
THOTH MEASURE: #10 - Oh thou who orderest the flame, who makest thine
appearance in Memphis; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *FOOD*.
#VIRTUE: With Defectiveness (no. #10), selfishness and crookedness.
#TOOLS: With Vastness (no. #50), fairmindedness and desirelessness.
#POSITION: As to Branching Out (no. #9), it is the advance.
#TIME: As to Holding Back (no. #17), it is the retreat.
#CANON: #86 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *JUDGES* / *ELOHYM*
#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis (G1520):
{#12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*;
At this stage of appraisal, Kant appears to be procrastinatory {ie. as
the habitual/intentional delay of starting or finishing a task despite
its negative consequences} and conveys the ambiguous thought on ANALYTIC
A POSTERIORI that it was self-contradictory by nature. But, some other
philosophers treated it as valid. But what are examples of ANALYTIC A
POSTERIORI knowledge?
Is determining the length of the tropical year from a base-7 chronology
of 364 days an example of “ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI” knowledge?
364 x 294 (ie. 364 x 6 x 49) = 107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126
Is defining the TELOS as #6000 % 22 = 13 September 2001 with a #41 as
ONTIC necessity of the *APEIRON* also an example of “ANALYTIC A
POSTERIORI” knowledge?
#0 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he supplants,
That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 4000 BCE
... [THE APEIRON] ...
#8800 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he
supplants, That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 8800 CE
APEIRON@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 81 (#82); Ego: 80 (#81),
@3: Sup: 5 (#87); Ego: 5 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@4: Sup: 15 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 10 (#96),
@5: Sup: 34 (#136); Ego: 19 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@6: Sup: 23 (#159); Ego: 70 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN
BEHAVIOUR {%25}),
@7: Sup: 73 (#232); Ego: 50 (#235 - ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA
@235 ON 7 JUNE 1942 AS SHOOTING ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY OF THESE
SELF-STYLED BIBLE STUDENTS (BIBELFORSCHER}),
Male: #232; Feme: #235
} // #316
APEIRON (ἄπειρον) is a Greek word meaning "(that which is) unlimited,"
"boundless", "infinite", or "indefinite"[1] from ἀ- a-, "without" and
πεῖραρ peirar, "end, limit", "boundary",[2] the Ionic Greek form of
πέρας peras, "end, limit, boundary". It is akin to Persian piramon,
meaning "*BOUNDARY*, *CIRCUMFERENCE*, *SURROUNDING*".
My approach to this at this stage is to acknowledge that Kant considers
that noumena is impossible to conceive by Pure Thought and therefore he
doesn’t fully conceive any “ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI” possibility and it’s
notion of TETRAGRAMMATON is itself an a priori postulate but as a
recursive enumeration giving forth a trinomial #NUMBER definition as
process of “SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI” by it's as formulation of
progression. This dialectic is then in turn consistent with Kant's
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE as rationalism being an intellectual conception:
+ 0, 27, 54 - HEAVEN: Universal Law {@1}
+ 0, 9, 18 - EARTH: Humanity {@2}
+ 0, 3, 6, - SEA: Autonomy {@3}
+ 1, 2, 3 - FOUNTAIN: Progression {@4}
Thus the ANALYTIC {YANG CH’I} A PRIORI given by the alternative HOMOIOS
mathematical notion of #NUMBER with the recursive necessity of an #41 -
ONTIC {NORMA OBLIGANS} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism:
REMEMBER THE SABBATH and it’s SYNCRETIC {YIN CH’I} A PRIORI such as
beIng SAPIENT with the recursive necessity of an #82 - ONTIC
{MANIFESTING NORM} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism:
HONOUR PARENTS is a conception of fecundity by its capacity in producing
or capable of producing offspring, fruit, vegetation, etc., in
abundance; prolific; fruitful: fecund parents; fecund farmland and hence
its equinox
association.
It also conveys a sapient propensity in being very productive or
creative intellectually: the fecund years of the Italian Renaissance.
One must therefore ask on the basis of an analytic a posteriori why Kant
withheld such knowledge given the words had their origin: 1375–1425;
late Middle English < Latin fēcundus, equivalent to fē- (see fetus) +
-cundus adj. suffix; replacing late Middle English fecounde < Anglo-French
And the most probable answer is that such idea which Kant conveys by
APRIORITY PROTOTYPES is that they are tectonic shifts with a cataclysmic
consequence which is made against the prevailing Latin binomial world
order constituted by its NATURE bifurcations by means of another
ethereal construct: @1 / @5.
Furthermore is Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
consideration of *VOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin voluntās f (genitive
voluntātis):
- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such
as mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of
the natural world.
And consideration of *NOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin nōluntās f (genitive
nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used
in reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the
natural world.
Are these then considered a priori as to the enumeration of an autonomy
of will by which apperception is circumscribed as an ANALYTIC A
POSTERIORI of PUPIL with the recursive necessity of an #123 - ONTIC
{DISCRIMINATING
NORM} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism: DO NOT KILL as its
ontological utility as reciprocality {#369: 9(9²+1)/2 A POSTERIORI as
enumeration function of equation n(n²+1)/2 — *NEED* *TO* *THINK* *ABOUT*
*THIS*
#1 + #41 + #81 = #123 + #369 = #492 (#451 + #41) as *FREEWILL* being #12
x #41 as ONTIC necessity
#YOD (#10) as CENTRE
#MEM (#40) as DELIMITATION
#TAU (#400) as CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH (#1) as STREAMING {23 CHROMOSOMES} = #451
AS BIFURCATION: #TAU x #41 = #902 / #2 = #451
} the syncretic process eventually occurs as SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI
progression being then genitive of a self declaration as an heteronomous
{ie subject to law external to itself} and autonomous reality.
In such a circumstance, what is then the *PROBITY* of utilising an EGO
defensive mechanism constituted by a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL of
IGNORANCE against any further progression of this #41 - *ONTIC*
NECESSITY = #492 (#451 + #41) AS *FREEWILL* being #12 x #41 of
ANTHROPOCENTRIC (CIRCULAR) REALITY?
Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
distinction between descriptive statements which present an account of
how the world is being analogous to the LIMITED {#9 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL AS DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS / SEMINAL REASON
GENERALLY DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative statements presenting
an evaluative account, or an account of how the syncretic world should
be as existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in
being optimally something that should be lived up to; or that should be
pursued.
“JESUS ANSWERED, *ARE* *THERE* *NOT* *TWELVE* *HOURS* *IN* *THE* *DAY*
{ie. 24 x 60 minutes = #1440 / #72 = 20 minutes allocations}? *IF* *ANY*
*MAN* *WALK* *IN* *THE* *DAY*, *HE* *STUMBLETH* *NOT*, *BECAUSE* *HE*
*SEETH* *THE* *LIGHT* *OF* *THIS* *WORLD*-*KOSMOS*.
BUT IF A MAN WALK IN THE NIGHT, HE STUMBLETH, BECAUSE THERE IS NO LIGHT
IN HIM.” [John 11:9-10 (KJV)]
At the center of a philosophical doctrine of nature, there would then
stand general descriptive judgments; that means, more precisely,
statements of law that describe how objects of nature act. And at the
center of a doctrine of morals there would stand normative judgments
that exhibit a comparable degree of generality and modal status. I will
later address more thoroughly what it could mean that some normative
judgments exhibit a comparable modal status to statements of law in the
natural sciences. Such a parallel is far from trivial. On the contrary,
it is one of the critical challenges for the interpretation of Kant’s
ethical writings. The first step toward a unified interpretation of the
two kinds of laws consists in seeing both kinds equally as
propositionally structured entities that demonstrate a clearly
identifiable logical form. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 5]
And to illustrate the ontological significances of this, I'm considering
on the proviso that there is sufficient time for its inclusion within
this initial draft document, a summary of Kant’s broad description of
the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE before then using the noumena to examine the
historical event occurring upon 25 December 1770 when Captain Cook
sought repairs in Batavia and a sailor absconded as worthy example.
But I will have to do some preliminary research and prudently consider
the semantical terms which are not common usage to our present
sensibility, before that occurs."
DANIEL60 [SHORT A DIGIT: +1 = #61 / % #41 = #20]
(***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2154 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "My
question for the day would have to be "What the hell does '*REFUTATION*'
{ie. the action of proving a statement or theory to be wrong or false}
mean??" Sounds like a made-up word! Or a 'WORD' used by someone trying
to sound edu-ma-cated, in the vein of 'BULLSHIT BAFFLES THE BRAINLESS'!!"
NOMEN NESCIO [LATIN: I DON'T KNOW THE NAME] (***@DIZUM.COM) @ 2022
HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "DOLF CAN PEEL AND EAT BANANAS USING HIS TOES:
N.B. Harry Houdini never did this, but other primates can."
FRAN SNORTELUS (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1157 HOURS ON 2
SEPTEMBER 2018: "It's a perfectly valid word and can be found in the
OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY. It means the action of refuting or
disproving a statement/fact and probably also a theory.
But it IS a valid word and it IS used by people who ARE educated!"
DOLF @ 0658 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018: "NOMEN NESCIO’S [LATIN: I DON'T
KNOW THE NAME] NEO-NAZISM AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION IS TO BE DRIVEN
FROM OUR LAND WITH ALL THE ZEAL IN FREEDOM OF VOLUNTARY WILL WHICH WAS
AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE AND THE FRENCH ENLIGHTENMENT AS REVOLUTION:
Whom are you as #41 - ONTIC necessity that we ought consider any
ontological regard?
The Australian Catholic Church by rejecting calls for priests to report
child abuses confession and instead making an economy of such by an
appeal to so called Papal Authority against counsel of the Royal
Commission established by Letters Patent (DIEU ET MON DROIT) as powers
and Authority given Royal Assent on 8 August 1902.
Validates our authority of intended purpose in having #8 Papal Bulls
within our prudent determination as legal recourse and we are going to
first assist others in their recompense and then we will take the rest...
And I swear by Almighty God that what has been ordained to be so shall be.
THE END OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM BABOONERY MASQUERADING PIETY AS THE
CLAMOURING FOR ‘N ORT AND WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A CAT-O-NINE TAILS TO
YOUR IMPERTINENT HIDE AND TEACH YOU FIRSTLY A PROTOCOL OF CONFESSION AND
THEN THE DIGNITY OF SILENCE.
The *TRINOMIAL* *MATHEMATICAL* *THEORETICAL* *NOUMENON* *AS* *MATERIA*
*PRIMA* is a savant endowment as capacity of MIND which is attributed to
the *SOVEREIGN* but not *CHIMPANZEES* as being savages since you don’t
have the mind development excepting to use *DEIFIED* *IGNORANCE* as
#231- JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL which is otherwise incapable for such
sapient existence:
G2233@{
#1: Sup: 8; Ego: 8,
#2: Sup: 11; Ego: 3,
#3: Sup: 19; Ego: 8,
#4: Sup: 57; Ego: 38,
#5: Sup: 58; Ego: 1,
#6: Sup: 15; Ego: 38,
#7: Sup: 24; Ego: 9,
#8: Sup: 29; Ego: 5,
Male: #221; Feme: #110
} // #434
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #137 % #41 = #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics);
I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 -
Branching Out;
THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
Mabit; *I* *DEAL* *NOT* *FRAUDULENTLY*.
#VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but
#TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
#POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
#TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
#CANON: #140
#434 as [#8, #3, #8, #200, #1, #200, #9, #5] = hegeomai (G2233): {#6 as
#137 % #41 = #14} 1) to lead; 2) to consider, deem, account, think; 1a)
to go before; 1b) to be a leader; 1b1) *TO* *RULE*, command; 1b2) to
have authority over; 1b3) *A* *PRINCE*, *OF* *REGAL* *POWER*, governor,
viceroy, chief, leading as respects influence, *CONTROLLING* *IN*
*COUNSEL*, overseers or leaders of the churches; 1b4) used of any kind
of leader, chief, commander; 1b5) the leader in speech, chief, spokesman;
“FOR THIS CORRUPTIBLE MUST PUT ON INCORRUPTION, AND THIS MORTAL MUST PUT
ON IMMORTALITY.
SO WHEN THIS CORRUPTIBLE SHALL HAVE PUT ON INCORRUPTION, AND THIS MORTAL
SHALL HAVE PUT ON IMMORTALITY, THEN SHALL BE BROUGHT TO PASS THE SAYING
THAT IS WRITTEN, *DEATH* {#902 as [#400, #40, #6, #400, #6, #50] = muwth
(H4191): {#451 % #41 = #41} 1) A primitive root; to die (literally or
figuratively); causatively, to kill; [idiom] at all, [idiom] crying,
(be) dead (body, man, one), (put to, worthy of) *DEATH*, destroy(-er),
(cause to, be like to, must) die, kill, necro(-mancer), [idiom] must
needs, slay, [idiom] surely, [idiom] very suddenly, [idiom] in (no) wise.
} *IS* *SWALLOWED* *UP* *IN* *VICTORY*.
EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 WHICH CONVEYS AN EQUIVALENT MAGIC
ROW SUM TO THE FIRST MAGIC SQUARE THE EGYPTIAN ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE
41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}
"AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {
#I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
#N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 -
Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
#R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS
THY NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1
SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
#I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO
which is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}
INRI@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
Male: #114; Feme: #108
} // #270
#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
same light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
*GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 -
TORAH} - Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
each other {Latin CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}.
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
[IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:
Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).
*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage /
sovereign dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus}
Empire Governance]
THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]
O DEATH, WHERE IS THY STING? *O* *GRAVE*, *WHERE* *IS* *THY* *VICTORY*?
THE STING OF DEATH IS SIN; AND THE STRENGTH OF SIN IS THE LAW [OF
METEMPIRICAL CONTORTIONS AS NORMATIVE DECEPTIONS SUCH AS YOURS].”
[1Corinthians 15:54-56 (KJV)
Kant assigns three transitions to the three sections of the work
although it is unclear whether the sections also contain the starting
points and termini named in the title or whether they ultimately have
only the transitions themselves as topics. Kant’s mention of an
initially “ANALYTICALLY” and subsequently “SYNTHETICALLY” proceeding is
also unclear and disputed among interpreters (GMS, 392,19-22). A
possible interpretation consists in directly connecting the expressions
“ANALYTICALLY” and “SYNTHETICALLY” to the word “METHOD.” This would mean
that Kant refers here to the two different methods of instruction
(“Lehrarten”) mentioned in the Prolegomena, which appeared in 1783. In
the two-year older work, this process is explained "THE ANALYTICAL
METHOD [. ..] SIGNIFIES [. . .] THAT WE START FROM WHAT IS SOUGHT, AS IT
WERE GIVEN, AND ASCEND TO THE ONLY CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH IS POSSIBLE”
(AA IV, 276 note). Kant expressly emphasizes that the analytical method
has nothing to do with the procedure of conceptual analysis, but
concerns only the method (“Lehrart”): “THE ANALYTIC; METHOD, INSOFAR AS
IT IS OPPOSED TO THE SYNTHETICAL, IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM AN AGGREGATE OF
ANALYTIC PROPOSITIONS” (ibid).
BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 0453 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "GEERT BE
WILDERS BLAAST CARTOONWEDSTRIJD AF:
It was also a item on the news. GEERT did not think it worth all those
threats. Still its interesting to see how many madmen live in Pakistan
and the rest of the world."
PANDORA'S BOX (***@KNOWARE.NL) @ 0611 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Why
don't they announce with fanfare a cartoon contest in which Jesus
ridiculed."
BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 0632 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Then nothing
happens. At most a little sputtering."
EDMUND (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1650 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Yes, you
are right, hundreds of people are killed immediately burned flags,
praised prizes to kill bp people.
Oh wait oh no, nothing happens at all.
Look up:
YOUTUBE: "The Life Of Brian - The People's Front of Judea"
or
YOUTUBE: "Monty Python And The Holy Grail - The Black Knight - Tis But A
Scratch"
An excellent example of the difference between those backward ones
barbarians and the normally developed world.
Feel free to make the same MONTY PYTHON film about the Quran, that is
laughing man."
BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 2110 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "By the way,
who's talking about ridiculous?"
DOLF @ 2143 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "This implication of 18 August
1811, Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte (1804 - 1814) issuing a decree, based
on French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is
that a large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman
Empire Governance and therefore did not have any authenticated notion of
Sophia as wisdom which is derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
as the basis of science.
That portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be
regarded as *BARBARIANS* and enlightenment was like the price of tulip
🌷 bulbs a decadent societal entitlement and status.
— CONDOMS GALORE —
[Amsterdam Pride 3 August 2018]
“HEINZ DAUGHTER.
LOOKING FOR SOUP.
WANDERING AFTER.
PARADING TROUPE.
A FATHER TO BE.
BY SIDEWALK HOPE.
EVERYONE IS FREE.
NO NEED TO ELOPE.”
TURKEY-BASTER@{
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 24 (#24),
@2: Sup: 20 (#32); Ego: 29 (#53),
@3: Sup: 47 (#79); Ego: 31 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@4: Sup: 21 (#100); Ego: 46 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
@5: Sup: 10 (#110); Ego: 66 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
@6: Sup: 65 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}); Ego: 11 (#207),
@7: Sup: 10 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
56 (#263),
@8: Sup: 79 (#264); Ego: 72 (#335),
@9: Sup: 54 (#318); Ego: 37 (#372),
Male: #318; Feme: #372
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{318}&idea:{372}>
H2658@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
@3: Sup: 37 (#105); Ego: 80 (#118),
@4: Sup: 75 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 38 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
Male: #180; Feme: #156
} // #318
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #288 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.
#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
#TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
#POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
#TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_45@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 2 (#3); Ego: 1 (#2),
@3: Sup: 43 (#46); Ego: 41 (#43),
@4: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 2 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
Male: #91; Feme: #45
} // #45
#318 as [#30, #8, #80, #200] = chaphar (H2658): {UMBRA: #1 as #288 % #41
= #1} 1) to dig, search for; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to dig; 1a2) *TO* *SEARCH*,
*SEARCH* *OUT*, *EXPLORE*;
H3366@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
@3: Sup: 31 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}); Ego: 19 (#31),
@4: Sup: 69 (#114); Ego: 38 (#69),
@5: Sup: 75 (#189); Ego: 6 (#75),
Male: #189; Feme: #75
} // #318
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch;
Tetra: 26 - Endeavour;
THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
appearance in Urit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *HOT* *OF* *SPEECH*.
#VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
#TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
#POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
#TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
#CANON: #158
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_158@{
@1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
@2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
@4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I
AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
Male: #156; Feme: #158
} // #158 <-- *ONTIC* *VALUE* *FOR* *2ND* *NOVICHOK* *POISONING* *EVENT*
#318 as [#2, #10, #100, #200, #6] = yeqar (H3366): {UMBRA: #3 as #310 %
#41 = #23} 1) *PRICE*, *VALUE*, *PRECIOUSNESS*, *HONOUR*, *SPLENDOUR*,
*POMP*; 1a) preciousness; 1b) price; 1c) honour, esteem;
G3120@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 41 (#81); Ego: 1 (#41),
@3: Sup: 71 (#152); Ego: 30 (#71),
@4: Sup: 72 (#224); Ego: 1 (#72),
@5: Sup: 11 (#235 - ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @235 ON 7 JUNE
1942 AS SHOOTING ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY OF THESE SELF-STYLED BIBLE
STUDENTS (BIBELFORSCHER}); Ego: 20 (#92),
@6: Sup: 81 (#316); Ego: 70 (#162),
@7: Sup: 10 (#326); Ego: 10 (#172),
@8: Sup: 48 (#374); Ego: 38 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
Male: #374; Feme: #210
} // #372
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #362 % #41 = #34 - Great Guide, Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching:
H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has
been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties;
THOTH MEASURE: #34 - Oh Nefertmu, who makest thine appearance in
Memphis; *I* *AM* *NEITHER* *A* *LIAR* *NOR* *A* *DOER* *OF* *MISCHIEF*.
#VIRTUE: With Kinship (no. #34), drawing close to goodness, but
#TOOLS: With Closure (no. #74), closing out feelings of obligation.
#POSITION: As to Closure (no. #74), both are shut off, but
#TIME: As to Closeness (no. #33), all use the One.
#CANON: #215
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_215@{
@1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
@2: Sup: 27 (#61); Ego: 74 (#108),
@3: Sup: 20 (#81); Ego: 74 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@4: Sup: 53 (#134); Ego: 33 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
OF MISCHIEF {%34}),
Male: #134; Feme: #215
} // #215 <— *NOTE* *ALIGNMENT* *WITH* ADOLF HITLER’S TABLE TALK IDEA
AND ELOHYM AS #86 - ALMIGHTY GOD (SEE ABOVE)
#372 as [#40, #1, #30, #1, #20, #70, #10, #200] = malakos (G3120):
{UMBRA: #12 as #362 % #41 = #34} 1) soft, soft to the touch; 2)
metaphor: in a bad sense; 2a) effeminate; 2a1) of a catamite; 2a2) of a
boy kept for homosexual relations with a man; 2a3) of a male who submits
his body to unnatural lewdness; 2a4) of a male prostitute;
I would therefore take issue with your claim made of the normative
descriptor *BARBARIANS* which is a term of relative association and
according to my perspective of the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY published
within 4BCE by YANG HSIUNG whom determines the #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY
{POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} AS DERIVED FROM THE I CHING
AS 8x8 {#260 - COMPATIBLE TO PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL NOTION OF NUMBER} =
H64 BINOMIAL {MALE: YANG CH'I / FEME: YIN CH'I) BY MEANS OF A MAPPED
ASSOCIATION WITH THE TETRAGRAMMATON {#1 + #41 + #81 = #123}: "Since
neither the content nor the structure of the Changes implies a temporal
sequence, the Mystery follows generally a proposed rearrangement of the
hexagrams put forward by the HAN Dynasty 206 BCE-220 CE Changes {H64
elements} master, CHING FANG (77-33 BC). YANG HSIUNG improved upon
CHING FANG’S approach to symmetry in the cyclic structure he was
creating. He avoided, for example, certain inelegances of CHING FANG’S
schema (which involved only 60 hexagrams) when he incorporated
references to all 64 HEXAGRAMS in his arrangement of TETRAGRAMS and also
substituted the winter solstice for FANG’S artificial point of departure
(the new moon of the tenth civil month as GRAND INCEPTION determined
midnight of 21 DECEMBER 103 BCE), so that his cycle starts at the point
which marked the actual beginning of the tropical year for the HAN
astronomer.
Each pair of *HEXAGRAMS* separated by six months (for example: H19 -
APPROACH / TETRA: #9 - BRANCHING OUT {#65 CE - SOLDIER / 27-31 JANUARY}
and H33 - RETREAT / TETRA: #49 - FLIGHT {26-30 JULY}) are LINE-BY-LINE
POLAR OPPOSITIONS and together with the corresponding schema of
INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES produces *ONTIC* NECESSITY a REVERSE
TRANSCRIPTASE inhibitor as TETRACYTS being *KNOWLEDGE* *OF* *THINGS*
*IN* *THE* *DIVINE* *MIND* *OPERATING* *INTELLECTUALLY*:
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #91 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;
THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; I am not a teller of lies.
#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161
Each of these twelve “waxing and waning” hexagrams, along with 48 other
hexagrams, also correspond to equal intervals of 6 7/80 days (in other
words, 1/60 of the solar year of 365 1/4 days). The remaining four
hexagrams found in the Changes, called “standard hexagrams,” correspond
to the solstices and equinoxes and thus to the four cardinal points of
the sun’s path. They are not segments of the cycle, then, but points
fixed in space, which move back and forth in time. The sun may pass
through one of them on any day of the lunar month in which it is
located. From the astronomer’s point of view, it is the new moons that
move back and forth around them. [Nylan, 15-16]
And on TETRA: #45 - *GREATNESS* which then made of the #POSITION as
comprising an ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI determinism within, YANG HSIUNG
comments: The truly *WISE* {
H7069@{
@1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
@2: Sup: 69 (#88); Ego: 50 (#69),
@3: Sup: 74 (#162); Ego: 5 (#74),
@4: Sup: 80 (#242); Ego: 6 (#80),
Male: #242; Feme: #80
} // #161
#161 as [#100, #50, #5, #6] = qanah (H7069): {UMBRA: #14 as #161 % #41 =
#38} 1) to get, acquire, create, buy, possess; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to get,
acquire, obtain; 1a1a) of God originating, creating, redeeming His
people; 1a1a1) possessor; 1a1b) of Eve acquiring; 1a1c) of *ACQUIRING*
*KNOWLEDGE*, *WISDOM*; 1a2) to buy; 1b) (Niphal) to be bought; 1c)
(Hiphil) to *CAUSE* *TO* *POSSESS*;
} PAYS CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE FIRST SMALL *SIGNS* *OF* *CHANGE* {
H5927@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
@3: Sup: 45 (#107); Ego: 70 (#126),
@4: Sup: 75 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
Ego: 30 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
@5: Sup: 80 (#262); Ego: 5 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #262; Feme: #161
} // #161
#161 as [#6, #50, #70, #30, #5] = `alah (H5927): {UMBRA: #4 as #161 %
#41 = #38} 1) to go up, ascend, climb; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to go up, ascend;
1a2) to meet, visit, follow, depart, withdraw, retreat; 1a3) to go up,
come up (of animals); 1a4) to spring up, grow, shoot forth (of
vegetation); 1a5) to go up, go up over, *RISE* (*OF* *NATURAL*
*PHENOMENON*); 1a6) to come up (before God); 1a7) to go up, go up over,
*EXTEND* (*OF* *BOUNDARY*); 1a8) *TO* *EXCEL*, *BE* *SUPERIOR* *TO*; 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to be taken up, be brought up, be taken away; 1b2) to
take oneself away; 1b3) to be exalted; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to bring up,
cause to ascend or climb, cause to go up; 1c2) to bring up, bring
against, take away; 1c3) to bring up, draw up, train; 1c4) to cause to
ascend; 1c5) to rouse, stir up (mentally); 1c6) to offer, bring up (of
gifts); 1c7) to exalt; 1c8) to cause to ascend, offer; 1d) (Hophal);
1d1) to be carried away, be led up; 1d2) to be taken up into, be
inserted in; 1d3) to be offered; 1e) (Hithpael) to lift oneself;
}, since no one [*POSSESSES*] sufficient strength to singlehandedly
defeat a well-developed trend. The sage looks at small details
overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation of his
visionary rule. Again a self-evident truth on the encapsulation of
knowledge which is here conveyed as impetus of gnomic imperative
purveyed by the binomial designation of name in being validated by
experiential reality:
The Apostle is named *PAUL* {small; little}
The commentators unanimously prefer a different reading, however:
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.
Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)
APPRAISAL 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
Such fame is empty.
FATHOMING 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.
Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit
the construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by
high rank by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes
public display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards
internal reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this,
he fails to focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are
far from *CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country
The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to
frame good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also
symbolizes *MONEY* since certain coins were minted in its image {
H3702@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
@3: Sup: 79 (#179); Ego: 80 (#160),
@4: Sup: 80 (#259); Ego: 1 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #259; Feme: #161
} // #161
#161 as [#20, #60, #80, #1] = kecaph (H3702): {UMBRA: #39 as #161 % #41
= #38} 1) silver; 1a) as metal; 1b) as *MONEY*;
} Here the house lacks either the incisive thinking or the material
resources it needs to flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before
too long, its reputation will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an
equivalence to the mystical cabalistic interpretation given to the
Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15 magic square and its gematria value:
H5014@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 52 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 2 (#52),
@3: Sup: 58 (#160); Ego: 6 (#58),
@4: Sup: 60 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 2 (#60),
Male: #220; Feme: #60
} // #60
#60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab (H5014): {UMBRA: #12 as #60 % #41 =
#19} 1) (Qal) TO *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED* (PARTICIPLE);
APPRAISAL 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
Into his realm, and so is victorious.
FATHOMING 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
Means: He oversees the *NINE* *BARBARIANS*.
Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with
humaneness, the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT
MARRIAGE AS PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT
HUMANENESS as having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting
the minimum of pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have
a civilizing effect on people.
ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION
VIII as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING*
unto Our said Governor General:
VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL*
*OTHER* *THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE*
*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General,
or, *in* *the* *event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to
such person or persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the*
*PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE*
*GOVERNMENT* of Our said Commonwealth.
} agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*,
or 'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomising what is *CENTRAL*, the true
sage eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the
earth. The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things
revolve. In return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal
presence {ie. The sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL*
transformation. If he would do Viewing of what he himself is, he should
do Viewing of the people who themselves are morally transformed by their
viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.
APPRAISAL 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
The many, because of the few.
FATHOMING 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.
If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will
eventually grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave
overwhelms tiny ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first
signs of disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation,
he can both adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the
Good. This is no less true in the private world of the soul than in the
public world of the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45, page #288]
— NOW I SEE —
"YOU'RE NOT AXIS MUNDI.
CENTRE OF AFFECTION.
PLAIN AS IT'S MONDAY.
YOUR BANAL REFLECTION.
ONE THING IS CLEAR.
DRESSED UP WITH BUNT {ie. smut}
THE MIRROR TO PEER.
YOUR WIFE HAS A ***@NT."
MICHAEL CHRIST: "I said to my wife [Brunhilda] that I would like to
speak like R.C. Sproul because he is articulate.
Lots of people who teach at that level are articulate.
To my surprise, she says, speakers like him speak like world book
encyclopedias.
My wife reckons I speak real, normal language, true and relevant, engage
personally, and inspirationally.
[Brunhilda] says if you are not personal then there is no hope of any
'listening'.
Now I know my newsgroup fans would agree with my wife.
So, I must say, thank you.
And thank you, again.
However, those of you that do not agree with my wife can get stuffed.
Amen."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "You speak fine. You just are out of
touch with scripture."
MILOCH ITCHY KOALA: "Dunno DukeMan...we need to parse his acknowledgment
out. I'm wondering if he sees his wife like Lot's wife.
Did Mrs Mikey's wife do something unBiblical... you know... something
out of Sodom & Gomorrah and now Mikey's worried about her turning into a
'pillar of salt'?
And what's the deal with RC Sproul... other than the fact he's a drunk
and finally resigned from his ministry.
Soooo many questions without any redeeming answers!
go Warriors!"
— PRELAPSARIAN —
"OH DEAR 'TIS SO PLAIN.
ORIGINAL SIN FOR ALL SEE.
JUST FOR BEING SO VAIN.
AND DISDAINFUL OF ME.
MURDEROUS LIKE CAIN.
SUCH A CROSS TO BEAR.
E'RYONE SEEMS TO KNOW.
THE NEWS IS EVERYWHERE.
SHAME IS SUCH A BLOW.
THEY'RE STARTING TO STARE."
*PRELAPSARIAN* (adjective)
- characteristic of or pertaining to any innocent or carefree period: a
prelapsarian youth.
- Theology: occurring before the Fall: the prelapsarian innocence of Eden.
- Word of the Day for 12 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com
ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "Trump and
Kushner are going down...
George Bush's ex Whitehouse lawyer said in his own words that he is
shocked and dismayed that the Republican Party and Trumps supporters are
defending Donald Trump and his actions."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Why not? He's innocent."
ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "We have courts
to decided that.."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Nope. The Constitution says we are
presumed innocent until proven otherwise."
ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "DICK Painter
went on to say that Comey has provided the kind of evidence that will
stand up in a court of law.
The Republican Party must be every bit as rotten as Trump and Kushner...
I hope that Trump and Kushner are booted out of politics and jailed and
if there is any justice at all in this world then they will lock them up
in a dungeon, throw the key away and burn the dungeon."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "For what?"
ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "Obstruction of
justice."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Not guilty."
— BISCUIT EUPHORIA —
"LET ME SPELL IT OUT.
STORIES OF GOSPEL TRUTH.
SO WHY OUGHT I POUT?
GOD BLIMEY AND STREWTH.
SHOULD I JUST PUCKER?
AS I LIKE STROOPWAFEL.
PISS OFF YOU ***@CKER.
OVER MATTERS SO TRIFLE."
And these APPRAISALS AS ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI AND FATHOMING AS SYNTHETIC
A POSTERIORI then as systematically comprise the INTELLECTUAL DECAD as
being equivalent to the Pythagoreans understanding of TEN as the
greatest number, as well for that it is the TETRACTYS, by that it
comprehends all arithmetical and harmonical proportions. Pythagoras
said, that TEN is the NATURE of NUMBER: because all Nations, Greeks,
[the *ARABS*] and *BARBARIANS*, reckon to it; and when they arrive at
it, return to the MONAD: as therefore compliant with the Chinese
perspective of the GRAND INCEPTION determined midnight of 21 DECEMBER
103 BCE.' [Chapter XIV, Pythagoras: His Life Teachings, Ninth Section
1687 edition of The History of Philosophy, p 529]
As the basis of the historical citation made within within the Epistle
to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist syncretic perennialist
philosophers whom published counterfactual works on the Religious
Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery the
reference to the nine *BARBARIANS* appears equitable to the Pythagorean
binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited
/ unlimited: “I AM DEBTOR BOTH TO THE GREEKS, AND TO THE *BARBARIANS* {
G915@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 3 (#5); Ego: 1 (#3),
@3: Sup: 22 (#27); Ego: 19 (#22),
@4: Sup: 24 (#51); Ego: 2 (#24),
@5: Sup: 25 (#76); Ego: 1 (#25),
@6: Sup: 44 (#120); Ego: 19 (#44),
@7: Sup: 33 (#153); Ego: 70 (#114),
@8: Sup: 43 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 10 (#124),
@9: Sup: 81 (#277); Ego: 38 (#162),
Male: #277; Feme: #162
} // #486
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #476 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
Distortion;
THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
Unsit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *BOISTEROUS* *IN* *BEHAVIOUR*.
#VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
#TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
#TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
#CANON: #185
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_185@{
@1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
@2: Sup: 9 (#34); Ego: 65 (#90),
@3: Sup: 51 (#85); Ego: 42 (#132),
@4: Sup: 23 (#108); Ego: 53 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
Male: #108; Feme: #185
} // #185
#486 as [#2, #1, #100, #2, #1, #100, #70, #10, #200] = barbaros (G915):
{UMBRA: #18 as #476 % #41 = #25} 1) one whose speech is rude, rough and
harsh; 2) one who speaks a foreign or strange language which is not
understood by another; 3) *USED* *BY* *THE* *GREEKS* *OF* *ANY*
*FOREIGNER* *IGNORANT* *OF* *THE* *GREEK* *LANGUAGE*, *WHETHER* *MENTAL*
*OR* *MORAL*, with the added notion after the Persian war, of rudeness
and brutality. *THE* *WORD* *IS* *USED* *IN* *THE* *NEW* *TESTAMENT*
*WITHOUT* THE* *IDEA* *OF* *REPROACHFULNESS*;
} BOTH TO THE WISE, AND TO THE UNWISE. SO, AS MUCH AS IN ME IS, I AM
READY TO PREACH THE GOSPEL TO YOU THAT ARE AT ROME {power; strength}
ALSO.” [Romans 1:14]
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] {
HOMOIOS
HETEROS
KABBALAH
AS DEFINED
} ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - Remember the
Sabbath]) ...
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#82 -
Honour your parents]) ...
#65 (@2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
- Do not kill]) ...
#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
#175 (@4 - Nature Amended in its Nature: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
- Do not steal]) ...
#260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
Bear no false witness]) ...
#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - Covet Not])
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Chinese naming conventions such as is exemplar by:
MAO ZE DONG
or
XI JIN PIN
“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
DANIEL60 [SHORT A DIGIT: +1 = #61 / % #41 = #20]
(***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2117 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Ah!
Well, there you go!! Now I am more edu-ma-cated!! :)"
FRAN SNORTELUS (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 2128 HOURS ON 2
SEPTEMBER 2018: "The power of usenet..... Now if we could only get the
PRETZEL to learn..... "
A second possible interpretation consists in referring the expressions
“ANALYTICALLY” and “SYNTHETICALLY,” as they are used here, neither
directly to the expression “METHOD” nor, consequently, to the concept of
method in the Prolegomena. Indeed, in the Preface to the Groundwork,
Kant says only that he wants “TO TAKE THE WAY” first ANALYTICALLY and
then SYNTHETICALLY. This leaves the possibility open to read the
expressions in a conceptual-analytical or conceptual-synthetical sense.
If one follows this interpretation, the outcome of the first two
sections is constituted in the “SEARCH” (GMS, 392,3) for the supreme
principle of morality. The goal of this “SEARCH” is an exact formulation
of the [#41 - *ONTIC* *NECESSITY* to] CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE. The
procedure Kant uses for this is that of conceptual analysis. The formula
of the categorical imperative can be found through the analytical
process, but its validity cannot yet be proven. For this reason, Kant
shifts to the CONCEPTUAL-SYNTHETICAL procedure in the third section and
therewith to the “ESTABLISHMENT” (GMS, 392,4) of the principle. In the
first two sections, it is, accordingly, solely a matter of ANALYTICAL
JUDGMENTS. In contrast, SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS, with which the proof of
validity can be achieved, would stand at the centre of the third
section. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 17-18]
DOLF @ 0436 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I am (being surnamed BOEK
self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical appeal to either
*REDUCTIO* *AD* *TRUMPIUM* for taking an obstinate or negative dialectic
disposition (ie. ) as is implied by the title of this chapter 'DUTCH
BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS' and then spiralling downwards into
forfeiture of decency by recourse to *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* until
one reaches a consequential depravity *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* (eg:
Hitler was in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are you), .
However, if ADOLF HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK as IDEA @1
expressed on Saturday 5 JULY 1941 that "THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A
SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME" as deploying the
NUMBER @1 / @5 PROTOTYPE as the basis of Roman Empire Governance by
which it was then an authenticated notion of *SOPHIA* *AS* *WISDOM* as
derived from Pythagorean binomial {#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as
[#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis (G1520): {#12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*}
nomenclature as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE
A CHOOK AS CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?
#541 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #300, #5, #50, #5, #10] = apokteino (G615):
{#60 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to kill in any way whatever; 2) metaphor: to
extinguish, abolish; 1a) to destroy, to allow to perish; 2a) to inflict
mortal death; 2b) *TO* *DEPRIVE* *OF* *SPIRITUAL* *LIFE* *AND* *PROCURE*
*ETERNAL* *MISERY* *IN* *HELL*
#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#11 as #341 % #41 = #13} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
dispensation;
#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460 %
#41 = #9} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling; 1b)
like: ie. corresponding to a thing;
#541 as [#20, #300, #1, #200, #9, #1, #10] = ktaomai (G2932): {#63 as
#541 % #41 = #8} 1) to acquire, get, or procure a thing for one's self,
to possess; 1a) to marry a wife;
#541 as [#5, #80, #10, #200, #20, #10, #1, #200, #5, #10] = episkiazo
(G1982): {#55 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *TO* *THROW* *A* *SHADOW* *UPON*,
*TO* *ENVELOP* *IN* *A* *SHADOW*, *TO* *OVERSHADOW* from a vaporous
cloud that casts a shadow the word is transferred to a shining cloud
surrounding and enveloping persons with brightness. Used of the Holy
Spirit exerting creative energy upon the womb of the virgin Mary and
impregnating it (a use of the word which seems to have been drawn from
the familiar Old Testament idea of a cloud as symbolising the immediate
presence and power of God);
#541 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #200] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#56 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
dispensation;
SEE ALSO: "REFUTATION OF SCORN: IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF
PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.6%20A%20METHODOLOGICAL%20NEW%20BEGINNING.pdf>
In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument
that attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably
leads to a ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove
one by showing that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or
impossible.
Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
(Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.
The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a
range of forms, as these examples show:
The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off
the edge.
There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were,
then it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.
The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is
a "smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>
Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY in being
normative description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted
{ie. #391} and what causality {#541} it had within and upon the populace.
The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) which was competed within 1631
is a Reformed church within Dutch Protestant church in central
Amsterdam, Netherlands. It lies in the most western part of the
Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum borough), next to the Jordaan,
between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.
The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three
main canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting
canal belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the
west and south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
Prinsengracht .
Furthermore as an instance of *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* is this your
quantitative statement: "An excellent example of the difference between
those backward *BARBARIANS* and the normally developed world. The
difference between *MORE* *AND* *LESS* secularized societies.
If one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
enlightenment, then one is espousing scientific endeavour and any
conveyance of such is framed by conceptions of NUMBER.
Thusly, to convey any difference on the basis of “*MORE* *OR* *LESS*”,
then one is making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished
otherwise) to at least as a starting point of Aristotelian (384–322 BCE)
understanding given of the binomial NATURE OF NUMBER as the earlier
ANALYTIC A PRIORI / SYNTHETIC A PRIORI conception of it enumerated by
the PYTHAGOREAN (c. 570 – c. 495 BCE) where there was both:
LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and
MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something
could be done well.
So then, there is a prudent contradiction (ie. IT DOESN'T CUT THE
MUSTARD) by a paucity of the rhetorical contrivance concerning the
necessity about the reality of secularised societies: *DUTCH* *OR*
*OTHERWISE*.
The modern sense of the idiom is 'to succeed; to have the ability to do
something; to come up to expectations' as to arouse amusement or
derision; ridiculous in being an absurdity.
WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?
Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.
[WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]"
GEERT BE WILDERS@{
@1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
@3: Sup: 46 (#124); Ego: 47 (#116),
@4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55
(#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
@5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
@6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
@7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
Male: #288 - *UMBRA* *CONTIVANCE*; Feme: #265
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>
H2438@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
@3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
@4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
Male: #166; Feme: #126
} // #288
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit;
Tetra: 25 - Contention;
THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.
#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148
#288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258
% #41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to
Jerusalem to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon;
2) the chief architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King
Hiram to Solomon;
H142@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
@3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
@4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26});
Ego: 38 (#93),
@5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
Male: #190; Feme: #103
} // #265
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;
THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
*OWN* *PROPERTY*.
#VIRTUE:
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157
#265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 %
#41 = #41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a)
(Niphal) majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;
H1396@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
@3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
@4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
@5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #245; Feme: #103
} // #265
#265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 %
#41 = #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be
mighty, be great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail;
1b) (Piel) to make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm,
give strength; 1c2) to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to
show oneself mighty; 1d2) to act proudly (toward God);
SEE ALSO: "(TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND
CAPACITY AS A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE /
#312 - RESISTANCE)"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>
— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
[PUBLISHED @ 0457 HOURS ON 1 OCTOBER 2017]
"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"
YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hotdog Commercial (1977)"
YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hot Dog 1990s Commercial Ad on Beach"
*CANT* (noun):
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious,
or political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded
with disparagement: thieves' cant.
ETHICAL_SPORTS_SLEDGE@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
ITS FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 -
*ONTIC* VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION,
CONTRARINESS, ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,302}&idea:{f,546}>
#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA:
#5 as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;
#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546
% #41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the
commandment (of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1604 HOURS
ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "That's like saying, "a surname name". Tautology and
repetition is *ONE* reason you make no sense."
DOLF @ 1729 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Your constipated turd 💩 opinion
whilst a sensualism as anal retentive declaration given self bestowal
through proscription of a grunt is no more substantial an entitlement
than a FANNY excretion of pustulant tripe which is enamoured by it’s
prolapsed existence though laborious in it’s eventuality as a shrivelled
spud with no viability as a snag {ie. *BAG* *OF* ****@T*: a despicable
person}.
— ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS —
“PARDON MY BEING A STICKYBEAK,
SCRUFF & GRINDR ARE NOW OBLIQUE.
HEARD YOUR CLARION FROM AFAR.
THE *WATCHERS* THAT WE ARE.
WHETHER YOUR FOOTLE IS TO BE
OR THRASONICAL FOR US MAY SEE
THE MEASURE OF YOUR SOUL.
WE KNOW, WE *KNOW* *IT* *ALL*.
WHEN JUSTICE IS SO VAIN {#235},
IN WANT LOSS AND DISDAIN.
THIS FESTSCHRIFT IS TO YOU,
ALSTUBLIEFT AND ADIEU.”
ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS {Germanic words 'ger' (*SPEAR*) and 'hard'
(strong or brave) meaning 'Strong or Brave with the *SPEAR*'.
The name's common female equivalent is 'Geertje' as my mother's name}
BE WILDERS ANTHEM@{
@1: Sup: 69 (#69); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#123); Ego: 43 (#47),
@3: Sup: 68 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 3 (#50),
@4: Sup: 75 (#266); Ego: 13 (#63),
@5: Sup: 23 (#289); Ego: 24 (#87),
@6: Sup: 73 (#362); Ego: 30 (#117),
@7: Sup: 46 (#408); Ego: 3 (#120),
@8: Sup: 28 (#436); Ego: 30 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@9: Sup: 78 (#514); Ego: 1 (#151),
@10: Sup: 33 (#547); Ego: 28 (#179),
@11: Sup: 64 (#611); Ego: 56 (#235 - ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA
@235 ON 7 JUNE 1942 AS SHOOTING ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY OF THESE
SELF-STYLED BIBLE STUDENTS (BIBELFORSCHER}),
@12: Sup: 36 (#647); Ego: 36 (#271),
@13: Sup: 43 (#690); Ego: 43 (#314),
@14: Sup: 37 (#727); Ego: 42 (#356),
Male: #727; Feme: #356
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{727}&idea:{356}>
STICKYBEAK:
- (noun) Australian Slang for a busybody; meddler.
CLARION:
- (adjective) Clear and shrill: the clarion call of a battle trump.
- (noun) An ancient trumpet with a curved shape.
FOOTLE:
- (verb) to act or talk in a foolish or silly way.
- (noun) nonsense; foolishness; silliness.
THRASONICAL:
- (adjective) boastful; vainglorious.
FESTSCHRIFT:
- (noun) A volume of articles, essays, etc., contributed by many authors
in honour of a colleague, usually published on the occasion of
retirement, an important anniversary, or the like. [Courtesy: Words of
Day for 8 to 12 December, 2016; www.dictionary.com]
H8454@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 7 (#14); Ego: 6 (#88),
@4: Sup: 64 (#78); Ego: 57 (#145),
@5: Sup: 74 (#152); Ego: 10 (#155),
@6: Sup: 79 (#231); Ego: 5 (#160),
Male: #231; Feme: #160
} // #727
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #727 % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
(massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;
THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
thine appearance in Syut; I am not of aggressive hand.
#VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
#TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
#POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
#TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
#CANON: #210
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_210@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 19 (#49); Ego: 70 (#100),
@3: Sup: 13 (#62); Ego: 75 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
@4: Sup: 48 (#110); Ego: 35 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
Male: #110; Feme: #210
} // #210 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #SIX: #114 / #342 AND TORAH
PROTOTYPES #FIVE: #114 / #342
#727 as [#6, #400, #6, #300, #10, #5] = tuwshiyah (H8454): {UMBRA: #3 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) *WISDOM*, *SOUND* *KNOWLEDGE*, *SUCCESS*, *SOUND*
*OR* *EFFICIENT* *WISDOM*, *ABIDING* *SUCCESS*; 1a) sound or efficient
wisdom; 1b) abiding success (of the effect of sound wisdom);
H2803@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 9 (#16); Ego: 8 (#90),
@4: Sup: 66 (#82); Ego: 57 (#147),
@5: Sup: 68 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 2 (#149),
@6: Sup: 73 (#223); Ego: 5 (#154),
@7: Sup: 79 (#302); Ego: 6 (#160),
Male: #302; Feme: #160
} // #727
#727 as [#6, #400, #8, #300, #2, #5, #6] = chashab (H2803): {UMBRA: #6
as #727 % #41 = #30} 1) *TO* *THINK*, *PLAN*, *ESTEEM*, *CALCULATE*,
*INVENT*, *MAKE* *A* *JUDGMENT*, *IMAGINE*, *COUNT*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
think, account; 1a2) to plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute,
reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value, regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal);
1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be
reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to think upon, consider,
be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise, plan; 1c3) to count, reckon;
1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;
— 👽👽👽👽👽👽👽 —
"THE *WATCHERS* WE ARE,
SO DO NOT DARE.
THOUGH IT BE FAR.
IT'S LIKE WE'RE THERE."
DOLF @ 1752 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018: "We have established a temporal
neural linguistic interface with you so that we can cure you of this
disease of ignorance as #335 - *MORAL* *BLINDNESS*:
G52@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 4 (#5); Ego: 3 (#4),
@3: Sup: 54 (#59); Ego: 50 (#54),
@4: Sup: 43 (#102); Ego: 70 (#124),
@5: Sup: 53 (#155); Ego: 10 (#134),
@6: Sup: 54 (#209); Ego: 1 (#135 - *ISLAMIC* STOICHEION
TRANSFORMATION *ONTIC* / *CANONICAL* PROTOTYPE OF AN #45 ARRAY WHERE
EACH ROW IS TOTALLING #135),
@7: Sup: 11 (#220); Ego: 38 (#173),
Male: #220; Feme: #173
} // #335
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #135 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit;
Tetra: 25 - Contention;
THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.
#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148
#335 as [#1, #3, #50, #70, #10, #1, #200] = agnoia (G52): {#9 as #135 %
#41 = #12} 1) lack of knowledge, ignorance; 1a) esp. of divine things;
1b) of *MORAL* blindness;
YOUTUBE: "2000 - Star Trek: Voyager - Unimatrix Zero"
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #210 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;
THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance
at Re-Stau; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *SLAYER* *OF* *MEN*.
#VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
#TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
#POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
#TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
#CANON: #115
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
@3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
@4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
Male: #118; Feme: #115
} // #115
#316 as [#50, #3, #7, #200, #50, #6] = gazar (H1504): {#0 as #210 % #41
= #5} 1) to cut, divide, cut down, cut off, cut in two, snatch, decree;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to cut in two, divide; 1a2) to cut down; 1a3) to cut
off, destroy, exterminate; 1a4) to decree; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be cut
off, separated, excluded; 1b2) to be destroyed, cut off; 1b3) to be decreed;
H3336@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 19 (#29); Ego: 9 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 26 (#112); Ego: 50 (#107),
@5: Sup: 32 (#144); Ego: 6 (#113),
Male: #144; Feme: #113
} // #356
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336): {UMBRA: #0 as #300 %
#41 = #13} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 2) Sefer Yetzirah as
Book of Creation in Theory and Practice; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2)
graven image; 1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) *PURPOSE*,
*IMAGINATION*, *DEVICE* (*INTELLECTUAL* *FRAMEWORK*);
"And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
every imagination {#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336):
imagination} of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually-."
[Genesis 6:5 (KJV)]
To what degree Kant’s proceedings in the Groundwork actually are to be
related to the Prolegomena published within 1783 is disputed among
interpreters. In the end, only an exact reconstruction of the entire
line of argumentation through the three sections of the work can provide
insight into Kant’s method in the Groundwork. His remarks in the Preface
offer little assistance in this endeavour as an heuristic way to
discover a science of metaphysics. Unlike other sciences, metaphysics
has not yet attained universal and permanent knowledge. There are no
standards to distinguish truth from error. Kant asked, "Can metaphysics
even be possible?.
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prolegomena_to_Any_Future_Metaphysics>]
#41 - IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH METAPHYSICS AS A SCIENCE, A CLEAR
DISTINCTION MUST BE MADE BETWEEN THE CATEGORIES (PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING) AND THE IDEAS (PURE CONCEPTS OF REASON).
The distinction of ideas, that is of pure concepts of reason, from
categories, or pure concepts of the understanding, as cognitions of
completely different type, origin, and use, is so important a piece of
the foundation of a science which is to contain a system of all these
cognitions a priori that, without such a division, metaphysics is
utterly impossible, or at best is a disorderly and bungling endeavour to
patch together a house of cards, *WITHOUT* *KNOWLEDGE* of the materials
with which one is preoccupied and of their suitability for one or
another end.
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #329 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
in Annu; I am not a doer of wrong.
#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
#TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
#POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
#TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_45@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 2 (#3); Ego: 1 (#2),
@3: Sup: 43 (#46); Ego: 41 (#43),
@4: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 2 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
Male: #91; Feme: #45
} // #45
G1558@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 25 (#30); Ego: 20 (#25),
@3: Sup: 29 (#59); Ego: 4 (#29),
@4: Sup: 39 (#98); Ego: 10 (#39),
@5: Sup: 59 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 20 (#59),
@6: Sup: 48 (#205); Ego: 70 (#129),
@7: Sup: 5 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}); Ego: 38 (#167),
Male: #210; Feme: #167
} // #329
#329 as [#5, #20, #4, #10, #20, #70, #200] = ekdikos (G1558): {UMBRA: #9
as #329 % #41 = #1} 1) *WITHOUT* *LAW* *AND* *JUSTICE*; 2) exacting
penalty from one; 2a) an avenger, punisher;
If the Critique of Pure Reason had done nothing but first point out this
distinction, it would thereby have already contributed more to
elucidating our conception of, and to guiding inquiry in, the field of
metaphysics, than have all the fruitless efforts undertaken previously
to satisfy the transcendent problems of pure reason, without it ever
being imagined that one may have been situated in a completely different
field from that of the understanding, and as a result was listing the
concepts of the understanding together with those of reason as if they
were of the same kind. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY,
Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @329]
TETRAGRAMMATON {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10 } HIERARCHY
VALUE AS THE METAPHYSICAL CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE TO THE HOMOIOS THEORY
OF *NUMBER*
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN - *FORMULA* *FOR*
*UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
#27 - Hume wrote that we cannot rationally comprehend cause and effect
(causality). Kant added that we also cannot rationally comprehend
substance and accident (subsistence) or action and reaction (community).
Yet he denied that these concepts are derived from experience. He also
denied that their necessity was false and merely an illusion resulting
from habit. These concepts and the principles that they constitute are
known before experience and are valid when they are applied to the
experience of objects. [Wikipedia
2018:Prolegomena_to_Any_Future_Metaphysics]
G3594@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 74 (#144); Ego: 4 (#74),
@3: Sup: 1 (#145); Ego: 8 (#82),
@4: Sup: 4 (#149); Ego: 3 (#85),
@5: Sup: 12 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 8 (#93),
@6: Sup: 50 (#211); Ego: 38 (#131),
@7: Sup: 58 (#269); Ego: 8 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED
ANIMALS {%13}),
@8: Sup: 68 (#337); Ego: 10 (#149),
Male: #337; Feme: #149
} // #311
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #890 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;
THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
I am not given to cursing.
#VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
#TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
#POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
#TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
#CANON: #177
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
@1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
@2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
@3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
@4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177
#311 as [#70, #4, #8, #3, #8, #200, #8, #10] = hodegeo (G3594): {UMBRA:
#20 as #890 % #41 = #29} 1) to be a guide, lead on one's way, to guide;
2) *TO* *BE* *A* *GUIDE* *OR* *A* *TEACHER*; 2a) to give guidance to;
G3809@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 10 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 10
(#91),
@4: Sup: 14 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego: 4
(#95),
@5: Sup: 19 (#204); Ego: 5 (#100),
@6: Sup: 29 (#233); Ego: 10 (#110),
@7: Sup: 30 (#263); Ego: 1 (#111),
@8: Sup: 68 (#331); Ego: 38 (#149),
Male: #331; Feme: #149
} // #311
#311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): {UMBRA:
#22 as #111 % #41 = #29} 1) *THE* *WHOLE* *TRAINING* *AND* *EDUCATION*
*OF* *CHILDREN* (*WHICH* *RELATES* *TO* *THE* *CULTIVATION* *OF* *MIND*
*AND* *MORALS*, *AND* *EMPLOYS* *FOR* *THIS* *PURPOSE* *NOW* *COMMANDS*
*AND* *ADMONITIONS*, *NOW* *REPROOF* *AND* *PUNISHMENT*) It also
includes the training and care of the body; 2) whatever in adults also
cultivates the soul, esp. by correcting mistakes and curbing passions.;
2a) instruction which aims at increasing virtue; 2b) chastisement,
chastening, (of the evils with which God visits men for their amendment);
Here is now the place to dispose thoroughly of the Humean doubt. He
rightly affirmed: that we in no way have insight through reason into the
possibility of causality, that is, *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *RELATING*
*THE* *EXISTENCE* *OF* *ONE* *THING* *TO* *THE* *EXISTENCE* *OF* *SOME*
*OTHER* *THING* *THAT* *WOULD* *NECESSARILY* *BE* *POSITED* *THROUGH*
*THE* *FIRST* *ONE*. I add to this that we have just as little insight
into the concept of subsistence, that is, of the necessity that a
subject, which itself cannot be a predicate of any other thing, should
underlie the existence of things – nay, that we cannot frame any concept
of the possibility of any such thing (although we can point out examples
of its use in experience); and I also add that this very
incomprehensibility affects the community of things as well, since we
have no insight whatsoever into how, from the state of one thing, a
consequence could be drawn about the state of completely different
things outside it (and vice versa), and into how substances, each of
which has its own separate existence, should depend on one another and
should indeed do so necessarily. Nonetheless, I am very far from taking
these concepts to be merely borrowed from experience, and from taking
the necessity represented in them to be falsely imputed and a mere
illusion through which long habit deludes us; rather, I have
sufficiently shown that they and the principles taken from them stand
firm a priori prior to all experience, and have their undoubted
objective correctness, though of course only with respect to experience.
[CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any
Future Metaphysics, IDEA @311]
#54 - This antinomy or self–conflict of reason results when reason
applies its principles to the sensible world. The antinomy cannot be
prevented as long as objects (mere appearances) of the sensible world
are considered to be things–in–themselves (objects apart from the way
that they appear). This exposition of the antinomy will allow the reader
to combat the dialectical illusions that result from the nature of pure
reason. [Wikipedia 2018:Prolegomena_to_Any_Future_Metaphysics]
H7878@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 6 (#36); Ego: 57 (#87),
@3: Sup: 16 (#52); Ego: 10 (#97),
@4: Sup: 24 (#76); Ego: 8 (#105),
Male: #76; Feme: #105
} // #348
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #318 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32
- Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;
THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *INCONSTANT* *MIND*.
#VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
#TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
#POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of profit.
#TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
#CANON: #186
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
@1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
@2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
@3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186
#348 as [#30, #300, #10, #8] = siyach (H7878): {UMBRA: #10 as #318 % #41
= #31} 1) to put forth, mediate, muse, commune, speak, complain, ponder,
sing; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to complain; 1a2) to muse, meditate upon, study,
ponder; 1a3) *TO* *TALK*, *SING*, *SPEAK*; 1b) (Polel) *TO* *MEDITATE*,
*CONSIDER*, *PUT* *FORTH* *THOUGHTS*;
This then is the *STATEMENT* *AND* *SOLUTION* *OF* *THE* *WHOLE*
*ANTINOMY* *IN* *WHICH* *REASON* *FINDS* *ITSELF* *ENTANGLED* *IN* *THE*
*APPLICATION* *OF* *ITS* *PRINCIPLES* *TO* *THE* *SENSIBLE* *WORLD*,
*AND* *OF* *WHICH* *THE* *FORMER* (*THE* *MERE* *STATEMENT*) *EVEN* *BY*
*ITSELF* *WOULD* *ALREADY* *BE* *OF* *CONSIDERABLE* *BENEFIT* *TOWARD*
*A* *KNOWLEDGE* *OF* *HUMAN* *REASON*, even if the solution of this
conflict should not yet fully satisfy the reader, who has here to combat
a natural illusion that has only recently been presented to him as such,
after he had hitherto always taken that illusion for the truth. One
consequence of all this is, indeed, inevitable; namely, that since it is
completely impossible to escape from this conflict of reason with itself
as long as the objects of the sensible world are taken for things in
themselves – and not for what they in fact are, that is, for mere
appearances – the reader is obliged, for that reason, to take up once
more the deduction of all our cognition a priori (and the examination of
that deduction which I have provided), in order to come to a decision
about it. For the present I do not require more; for if, through this
pursuit, he has first thought himself deeply enough into the nature of
pure reason, then the concepts by means of which alone the solution to
this conflict of reason is possible will already be familiar to him, a
circumstance without which I cannot expect full approbation from even
the most attentive reader. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF
PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @348]
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH - *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
#9 - My intuition of an object can occur before I experience an object
if my intuition contains only the mere form of sensory experience.
[Wikipedia 2018:Prolegomena_to_Any_Future_Metaphysics]
H3524@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 22 (#42); Ego: 2 (#22),
@3: Sup: 32 (#74); Ego: 10 (#32),
@4: Sup: 70 (#144); Ego: 38 (#70),
@5: Sup: 80 (#224); Ego: 10 (#80),
@6: Sup: 39 (#263); Ego: 40 (#120),
Male: #263; Feme: #120
} // #282
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #232 % #41 = #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
Closure;
THOTH MEASURE: #27 - Oh thou whose face is behind thee, and who makest
thine appearance at thy cavern; *I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *UNNATURAL*
*LUST*.
#VIRTUE: With Duties (no. #27), esteem for activity.
#TOOLS: With Darkening (no. #67), esteem for rest.
#POSITION: With Mired (no. #3), plucked out from calamity.
#TIME: With Aggravation (no. #76), lacking any pardons.
#CANON: #173
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_173@{
@1: Sup: 27 (#27); Ego: 27 (#27),
@2: Sup: 13 (#40); Ego: 67 (#94),
@3: Sup: 16 (#56); Ego: 3 (#97),
@4: Sup: 11 (#67); Ego: 76 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
{%27}),
Male: #67; Feme: #173
} // #173
#282 as [#20, #2, #10, #200, #10, #40] = kabbiyr (H3524): {UMBRA: #2 as
#232 % #41 = #27} 1) mighty, great, *POWERFUL*, many, much;
H7227@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 68 (#98); Ego: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@3: Sup: 70 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26});
Ego: 2 (#70),
@4: Sup: 80 (#248); Ego: 10 (#80),
@5: Sup: 39 (#287); Ego: 40 (#120),
Male: #287; Feme: #120
} // #282
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #202 % #41 = #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching:
H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of
the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;
THOTH MEASURE: #38 - Oh thou who makest mortals to flourish, and who
makest thine appearance at Sais; *I* *CURSE* *NOT* *A* *GOD*.
#VIRTUE: Fullness (no. #38) means the prime of life, but
#TOOLS: On the Verge (no. #78) means old age.
#POSITION: With Kinship (no. #34), attachment between even distant
relatives.
#TIME: With Severance (no. #70), offense to one’s own flesh and blood.
#CANON: #220
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_220@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 35 (#73); Ego: 78 (#116),
@3: Sup: 69 (#142); Ego: 34 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@4: Sup: 58 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
70 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}),
Male: #200; Feme: #220
} // #220
#282 as [#30, #200, #2, #10, #40] = rab (H7227): {UMBRA: #5 as #202 %
#41 = #38} 1) much, many, great; 2) captain, chief; 1a) much; 1b) many;
1c) *ABOUNDING* *IN*; 1d) more numerous than; 1e) abundant, enough; 1f)
great; 1g) strong; 1h) greater than adv; 1i) much, exceedingly n m;
If our intuition had to be of the kind that represented things as they
are in themselves, then absolutely no intuition a priori would take
place, but it would always be empirical. For I can only know what may be
contained in the object in itself if the object is present and given to
me. Of course, even then it is incomprehensible how the intuition of a
thing that is present should allow me to cognize it the way it is in
itself, since its properties cannot migrate over into *MY* *POWER* *OF*
*REPRESENTATION*; *BUT* *EVEN* *GRANTING* *SUCH* *A* *POSSIBILITY*, the
intuition still would not take place a priori, that is, before the
object were presented to me, for without that no basis for the relation
of my representation to the object can be conceived; so it would have to
be based on inspiration. There is therefore only one way possible for my
intuition to precede the actuality of the object and occur as an a
priori cognition, namely if it contains nothing else except the form of
sensibility, which in me as subject precedes all actual impressions
through which I am affected by objects. For I can know a priori that the
objects of the senses can be intuited only in accordance with this form
of sensibility. From this it follows: that propositions which relate
merely to this form of sensory intuition will be possible and valid for
objects of the senses; also, conversely, that intuitions which are
possible a priori can never relate to things other than objects of our
senses. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @282]
#18 - Judgments of experience are empirical judgments that are valid for
external objects. They require special pure concepts which have
originated in the pure understanding. All judging subjects will agree on
their experience of the object. When a perception is subsumed under
these pure concepts, it is changed into objective experience. On the
other hand, all empirical judgments that are only valid for the one
judging subject are judgments of mere perception. These judgments of
perception are not subsumed under a pure concept of the understanding.
[Wikipedia 2018:Prolegomena_to_Any_Future_Metaphysics]
We must therefore first of all note: that, although all judgments of
experience are empirical, that is, have their basis in the immediate
perception of the senses, nonetheless the reverse is not the case, that
all empirical judgments are therefore judgments of experience; rather,
beyond the empirical and in general beyond what is given in sensory
intuition, special concepts must yet be added, which have their origin
completely a priori in the pure understanding, and under which every
perception first can be subsumed and then, by means of the same
concepts, transformed into experience.
Empirical judgments, insofar as they have objective validity, are
JUDGMENTS OF EXPERIENCE; those, however, that are only subjectively
valid I call mere JUDGMENTS OF PERCEPTION. The latter do not require a
pure concept of the understanding, but only the logical connection of
perceptions in a thinking subject. But the former always demand, in
addition to the representations of sensory intuition, special concepts
originally generated in the understanding, which are precisely what make
the judgment of experience objectively valid.
H6767@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
@3: Sup: 17 (#31); Ego: 9 (#17),
@4: Sup: 47 (#78); Ego: 30 (#47),
@5: Sup: 56 (#134); Ego: 9 (#56),
@6: Sup: 5 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS {%13});
Ego: 30 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@7: Sup: 15 (#154); Ego: 10 (#96),
@8: Sup: 55 (#209); Ego: 40 (#136),
Male: #209; Feme: #136
} // #298
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #240 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu;
I am not one who curseth the king.
#VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
#TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
#POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
#TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
#CANON: #181
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
@2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
@4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181
#298 as [#6, #2, #90, #30, #90, #30, #10, #40] = tselatsal (H6767):
{UMBRA: #8 as #240 % #41 = #35} 1) *WHIRRING*, *BUZZING*; 2) spear; 3)
whirring locust;
"And David {well-beloved, dear} and all the house of Israel {who
prevails with God} played before the LORD on all manner of instruments
made of fir wood, even on harps, and on psalteries, and on timbrels, and
on cornets, and on cymbals {#298 as [#6, #2, #90, #30, #90, #30, #10,
#40] = tselatsal (H6767): cymbal}." [2Samuel 6:5 (KJV)]
All of our judgments are at first mere judgments of perception; they
hold only for us, i.e., for our subject, and only afterwards do we give
them a new relation, namely to an object, and intend that the judgment
should also be valid at all times for us and for everyone else; for if a
judgment agrees with an object, then all judgments of the same object
must also agree with one another, and hence the objective validity of a
judgment of experience signifies nothing other than its necessary
universal validity. But also conversely, if we find cause to deem a
judgment necessarily, universally valid (which is never based on the
perception, but on the pure concept of the understanding under which the
perception is subsumed), we must then also deem it objective, that is,
as expressing not merely a relation of a perception to a subject, but a
property of an object; for there would be no reason why other judgments
necessarily would have to agree with mine, if there were not the unity
of the object – *AN* *OBJECT* *TO* *WHICH* *THEY* *ALL* *REFER*, *WITH*
*WHICH* *THEY* *ALL* *AGREE*, *AND*, *FOR* *THAT* *REASON*, *ALSO*
*MUST* *ALL* *HARMONIZE* *AMONG* *THEMSELVES*. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE
HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics,
IDEA @298]
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI*
*JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}
#3 - A remark on the general division of judgment into analytical and
synthetical. This division is critical but has not been properly
recognized by previous philosophers. [Wikipedia
2018:Prolegomena_to_Any_Future_Metaphysics]
G5143@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 9 (#14); Ego: 4 (#9),
@3: Sup: 28 (#42); Ego: 19 (#28),
@4: Sup: 29 (#71); Ego: 1 (#29),
@5: Sup: 69 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 40 (#69),
@6: Sup: 58 (#198); Ego: 70 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
@7: Sup: 27 (#225); Ego: 50 (#189),
Male: #225; Feme: #189
} // #270
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #1805 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.
#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
#TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
#POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
#TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_45@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 2 (#3); Ego: 1 (#2),
@3: Sup: 43 (#46); Ego: 41 (#43),
@4: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 2 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
Male: #91; Feme: #45
} // #45
#270 as [#5, #4, #100, #1, #40, #70, #50] = trecho (G5143): {UMBRA: #26
as #1805 % #41 = #1} 1) to run; 2) metaph.; 1a) of persons in haste; 1b)
of those who run in a race course; 2a) *OF* *DOCTRINE* *RAPIDLY*
*PROPAGATED*; 2b) by a metaphor taken from runners in a race, to exert
one's self, strive hard; 2c) to spend one's strength in performing or
attaining something; 2d) word occurs in Greek writings denoting to incur
extreme peril, which it requires the exertion of all one's effort to
overcome;
"And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that gospel
which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately- to them which were of
reputation, lest by any means I should run {#270 as [#5, #4, #100, #1,
#40, #70, #50] = trecho (G5143): run}, or had run {#270 as [#5, #4,
#100, #1, #40, #70, #50] = trecho (G5143): run}, in vain." [Galatians
2:2 (KJV)]
"Ye did run {#270 as [#5, #4, #100, #1, #40, #70, #50] = trecho (G5143):
run} well; who did hinder you that ye should not obey the truth?"
[Galatians 5:7 (KJV)]
"Holding forth the word of life; that I may rejoice in the day of
Christ, that I have not run {#270 as [#5, #4, #100, #1, #40, #70, #50] =
trecho (G5143): run} in vain, neither laboured in vain." [Philippians
2:16 (KJV)]
G3992@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 4 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 5 (#85),
@3: Sup: 44 (#128); Ego: 40 (#125),
@4: Sup: 43 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 80
(#205),
@5: Sup: 48 (#219); Ego: 5 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
@6: Sup: 58 (#277); Ego: 10 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}),
@7: Sup: 27 (#304); Ego: 50 (#270),
Male: #304; Feme: #270
} // #270
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #1005 % #41 = #21 - Guiding the Physical, Emptying the Heart;
I-Ching: H31 - Reciprocity, Conjoining, Influence (wooing), Feelings;
Tetra: 42 - Going to Meet;
THOTH MEASURE: #21 - Oh thou who art above Princes, and who makest thine
appearance in Amu; *I* *DO* *NOT* *CAUSE* *TERRORS*.
#VIRTUE: Release (no. #21) means a push forward.
#TOOLS: Embellishment (no. #61) means a decline.
#POSITION: With Flight (no. #49), there is what one avoids.
#TIME: With Contention (no. #25), there is what one hastens towards.
#CANON: #156
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_156@{
@1: Sup: 21 (#21); Ego: 21 (#21),
@2: Sup: 1 (#22); Ego: 61 (#82),
@3: Sup: 50 (#72); Ego: 49 (#131),
@4: Sup: 75 (#147); Ego: 25 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
Male: #147; Feme: #156
} // #156
#270 as [#80, #5, #40, #80, #5, #10, #50] = pempo (G3992): {UMBRA: #24
as #1005 % #41 = #21} 1) to send; 1a) to bid a thing to be carried to
one; 1b) to send (thrust or insert) a thing into another;
"Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth
on him that sent {#270 as [#80, #5, #40, #80, #5, #10, #50] = pempo
(G3992): send} me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into
condemnation; but is passed from death unto life." [John 5:24 (KJV)]
G4158@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 69 (#149); Ego: 70 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@3: Sup: 73 (#222); Ego: 4 (#154),
@4: Sup: 81 (#303); Ego: 8 (#162),
@5: Sup: 19 (#322); Ego: 19 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
@6: Sup: 27 (#349); Ego: 8 (#189),
Male: #349; Feme: #189
} // #270
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #470 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;
THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; *I* *COMMIT* *NOT* *ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.
#VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
#TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
#POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
#TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
#CANON: #180
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
@1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
@2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
@3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
@4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
Male: #135; Feme: #180
} // #180
#270 as [#80, #70, #4, #8, #100, #8] = poderes (G4158): {UMBRA: #25 as
#470 % #41 = #19} 1) *REACHING* *TO* *THE* *FEET*; 2) a garment reaching
to the ankles, coming down to the feet;
"And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of
man, clothed with a garment {#270 as [#80, #70, #4, #8, #100, #8] =
poderes (G4158): garment} down to the foot {#270 as [#80, #70, #4, #8,
#100, #8] = poderes (G4158): garment}, and girt about the paps with a
golden girdle." [Revelation 1:13 (KJV)]
This division is indispensable with regard to the critique of human
understanding, and therefore deserves to be classical in it; other than
that I don’t know that it has much utility anywhere else. And in this I
find the reason why *DOGMATIC* *PHILOSOPHERS* (*WHO* *ALWAYS* *SOUGHT*
*THE* *SOURCES* *OF* *METAPHYSICAL* *JUDGMENTS* *ONLY* *IN*
*METAPHYSICS* *ITSELF*, *AND* *NOT* *OUTSIDE* *IT* *IN* *THE* *PURE*
*LAWS* *OF* *REASON* *IN* *GENERAL*) neglected this division, *WHICH*
*APPEARS* *TO* *COME* *FORWARD* *OF* *ITSELF*, and, like the famous
Wolff, or the acute Baumgarten *FOLLOWING* *IN* *HIS* *FOOTSTEPS*, could
try to find the proof of the principle of sufficient reason, which
obviously is synthetic, in the principle of *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as
[#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1)
*OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE*
*ENCOUNTER*}. By contrast I find a hint of this division already in
Locke’s essays on human understanding. For in Book 4, chapter 3, #9 f.,
after he had already discussed the various connections of
representations in judgments and the sources of the connections, of
which he located the one in identity or *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1)
*OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE*
*ENCOUNTER*} (analytic judgments) but the other in the existence of
representations in a subject (synthetic judgments), he then acknowledges
in #10 *THAT* *OUR* *COGNITION* (*A* *PRIORI*) *OF* *THESE* *LAST* *IS*
*VERY* *CONSTRICTED* *AND* *ALMOST* *NOTHING* *AT* *ALL*.
H6440@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 70 (#110); Ego: 30 (#70),
@3: Sup: 69 (#179); Ego: 80 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@4: Sup: 38 (#217); Ego: 50 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
@5: Sup: 48 (#265); Ego: 10 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
@6: Sup: 68 (#333); Ego: 20 (#230),
@7: Sup: 27 (#360); Ego: 40 (#270),
Male: #360; Feme: #270
} // #270
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #180 % #41 = #16 - Being a Guide, Returning to the Root; I-Ching:
H28 - Major Superiority, Excess, Great Exceeding, Preponderance of the
great, Critical mass; Tetra: 75 - Failure;
THOTH MEASURE: #16 - Oh thou who turnest backwards, who makest thine
appearance in Bubastis; *I *AM* *NOT* *AN* *EAVES*-*DROPPER*.
#VIRTUE: Contact (no. #16) means mutual compliance.
#TOOLS: Closed Mouth (no. #56) means no contact.
#POSITION: With Increase (no. #13), daily additions, but
#TIME: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily reductions.
#CANON: #140
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_140@{
@1: Sup: 16 (#16); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 72 (#88); Ego: 56 (#72),
@3: Sup: 4 (#92); Ego: 13 (#85),
@4: Sup: 59 (#151); Ego: 55 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} /
I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #151; Feme: #140
} // #140
#270 as [#40, #30, #80, #50, #10, #20, #40] = paniym (H6440): {UMBRA:
#15 as #180 % #41 = #16} 1) face; 1a) face, faces; 1b) presence, person;
1c) face (of seraphim or cherubim); 1d) face (of animals); 1e) face,
surface (of ground); 1f) as adv of loc/temp; 1f1) before and behind,
toward, in front of, forward, formerly, *FROM* *BEFORETIME*, *BEFORE*;
1g) with prep; 1g1) in front of, before, to the front of, in the
presence of, in the face of, at the face or front of, from the presence
of, from before, from before the face of;
"And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the
face {#270 as [#40, #30, #80, #50, #10, #20, #40] = paniym (H6440):
before} of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face {#270 as
[#40, #30, #80, #50, #10, #20, #40] = paniym (H6440): before} of the
waters." [Genesis 1:2 (KJV)]
But there is so little that is definite and reduced to rules in what he
says about this type of cognition, that it is no wonder if no one, and
in particular not even Hume, was prompted by it to contemplate
propositions of this type. For such general yet nonetheless definite
principles are not easily learned from others who have only had them
floating obscurely before them. One must first have come to them oneself
through one’s own reflection, after which one also finds them else-
where, where one certainly would not have found them before, because the
authors did not even know themselves that their own remarks were
grounded on such an idea. Those who never think for themselves in this
way nevertheless possess the quick-sightedness to spy everything, after
it has been shown to them, in what has already been said elsewhere,
where no one at all could see it before. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY
OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @270]
#6 - Mathematics consists of synthetic a priori knowledge. How was it
possible for human reason to produce such a priori knowledge? If we
understand the origins of mathematics, we might know the basis of all
knowledge that is not derived from experience. [Wikipedia
2018:Prolegomena_to_Any_Future_Metaphysics]
But in order to ascend from these pure a priori cognitions (which are
not only actual but also well-founded) to a possible cognition that we
seek – namely, a metaphysics as science – we need to comprehend under
our main question that which gives rise to metaphysics and which
underlies its purely naturally given (though not above suspicion as
regards truth) cognition a priori (which cognition, when pursued without
any critical investigation of its possibility, is normally called
metaphysics already) – in a word, the natural disposition to such a
science; and so the main transcendental question, divided into four
other questions, will be answered step by step:
1. How is pure mathematics possible?
2. How is pure natural science possible?
3. How is metaphysics in general possible?
4. How is metaphysics as science possible?
H6329@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
@3: Sup: 49 (#128); Ego: 10 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
@4: Sup: 68 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 19 (#149),
@5: Sup: 78 (#274); Ego: 10 (#159),
@6: Sup: 37 (#311); Ego: 40 (#199),
Male: #311; Feme: #199
} // #280
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #186 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;
THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; *I
*AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.
#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175
#280 as [#40, #80, #10, #100, #10, #40] = puwq (H6329): {UMBRA: #8 as
#186 % #41 = #22} 1) *TO* *BRING* *OUT*, *FURNISH*, *PROMOTE*, *GO*
*OUT*, *ISSUE*; 1a) (Hiphil); 1a1) to produce, furnish; 1a2) *TO*
*BRING* *OUT*, *ELICIT*, *OBTAIN*, *CAUSE* *TO* *COME* *OUT* *FROM*;
1a3) to promote; 1a4) to cause to go out to;
"Happy is the man that findeth wisdom, and the man that getteth {#280 as
[#40, #80, #10, #100, #10, #40] = puwq (H6329): obtain} understanding."
[Proverbs 3:13 (KJV)]
"For whoso findeth me findeth life, and shall obtain {#280 as [#40, #80,
#10, #100, #10, #40] = puwq (H6329): obtain} favour of the LORD."
[Proverbs 8:35 (KJV)]
"A good man obtaineth {#280 as [#40, #80, #10, #100, #10, #40] = puwq
(H6329): obtain} favour of the LORD: but a man of wicked devices will he
condemn." [Proverbs 12:2 (KJV)]
It can be *SEEN* *THAT* *EVEN* *IF* *THE* *SOLUTION* *TO* *THESE*
*PROBLEMS* *IS* *INTENDED* *PRINCIPALLY* *TO* *PRESENT* *THE*
*ESSENTIAL* *CONTENT* of the Critique, still it also possesses something
distinctive that is worthy of attention in its own right, namely, the
search for the sources of given sciences in reason itself, in order to
investigate and to survey for reason, by way of the deed itself, its
power to cognize something a priori; whereby these sciences themselves
then benefit, if not with respect to their content, nonetheless as
regards their proper practice, and, while *BRINGING* *LIGHT* *TO* *A*
*HIGHER* *QUESTION* *REGARDING* *THEIR* *COMMON* *ORIGIN*, *THEY*
*SIMULTANEOUSLY* *PROVIDE* *OCCASION* *FOR* *A* *BETTER* *EXPLANATION*
*OF* *THEIR* *OWN* *NATURE*.
G321@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#52),
@4: Sup: 55 (#159); Ego: 3 (#55),
@5: Sup: 60 (#219); Ego: 5 (#60),
@6: Sup: 17 (#236); Ego: 38 (#98),
@7: Sup: 26 (#262); Ego: 9 (#107),
@8: Sup: 27 (#289); Ego: 1 (#108),
@9: Sup: 37 (#326); Ego: 10 (#118),
Male: #326; Feme: #118
} // #280
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #855 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *WHO* *CURSETH* *THE* *KING*.
#VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
#TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
#POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
#TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
#CANON: #181
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
@2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
@4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181
#280 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #5, #200, #9, #1, #10] = anago (G321): {UMBRA:
#10 as #855 % #41 = #35} 1) *TO* *LEAD* *UP*, *TO* *LEAD* *OR* *BRING*
*INTO* *A* *HIGHER* *PLACE*; 2) of navigators: launch out, set sail, put
to sea;
"Then was Jesus led {#280 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #5, #200, #9, #1, #10] =
anago (G321): bring} up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted
of the devil.
And when he had fasted forty days and forty nights, he was afterward an
hungered. And when the tempter came to him, he said, If thou be the Son
of God, command that these stones be made bread. But he answered and
said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every
word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, and *SETTETH* *HIM*
*ON* *A* *PINNACLE* *OF* *THE* *TEMPLE*, and saith unto him, If thou be
the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his
angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee
up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone. Jesus said unto
him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.
Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and
showeth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; And
saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall
down and worship me. Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan:
for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only
shalt thou serve.
Then the devil leaveth him, and, behold, angels came and ministered unto
him." [Matthew 4:1-11 (KJV)]
HOW IS PURE MATHEMATICS POSSIBLE?
Here now is a great and proven body of cognition, which is already of
admirable extent and promises unlimited expansion in the future, which
carries with it thoroughly apodictic certainty (that is, absolute
necessity), hence rests on no grounds of experience, and so is a pure
product of reason, but beyond this is thoroughly synthetic. “How is it
possible then for human reason to achieve such cognition wholly a
priori?” Does not this capacity, since it is not, and cannot be, based
on experience, presuppose some a priori basis for cognition, which lies
deeply hidden, but which might reveal itself through these its effects,
if their first beginnings were only diligently tracked down? [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future
Metaphysics, IDEA @280]
+ 1, 2, 3 {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA}
PREAMBLE ON THE PECULIARITIES OF ALL METAPHYSICAL KNOWLEDGE
#1 - On the sources of metaphysics
Metaphysical principles are a priori in that they are not derived from
external or internal experience. Metaphysical knowledge is philosophical
cognition that comes from pure understanding and pure reason. [Wikipedia
2018:Prolegomena_to_Any_Future_Metaphysics]
PREAMBLE ON THE PECULIARITIES OF ALL METAPHYSICAL KNOWLEDGE [IDEA @265]
H5587@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 65 (#70); Ego: 60 (#65),
@3: Sup: 54 (#124); Ego: 70 (#135),
@4: Sup: 53 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 80 (#215
- I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34}),
@5: Sup: 63 (#240); Ego: 10 (#225),
@6: Sup: 22 (#262); Ego: 40 (#265),
Male: #262; Feme: #265
} // #265
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #210 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;
THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance
at Re-Stau; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *SLAYER* *OF* *MEN*.
#VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
#TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
#POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
#TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
#CANON: #115
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
@3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
@4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
Male: #118; Feme: #115
} // #115
#265 as [#5, #60, #70, #80, #10, #40] = ca`iph (H5587): {UMBRA: #7 as
#210 % #41 = #5} 1) ambivalence, *DIVISION*, *DIVIDED* *OPINION*;
"And Elijah {God the Lord, the strong Lord} came unto all the people,
and said, How long halt ye between two opinions {#265 as [#5, #60, #70,
#80, #10, #40] = ca`iph (H5587): thoughts}? if the LORD be God, follow-
him: but if Baal, then follow- him. And the people answered him not a
word." [1Kings 18:21 (KJV)]
ON THE SOURCES OF METAPHYSICS
If one wishes to present a body of cognition as science, then *ONE*
*MUST* *FIRST* *BE* *ABLE* *TO* *DETERMINE* *PRECISELY* *THE*
*DIFFERENTIA* it has in common with no other science, and which is
therefore its distinguishing feature; otherwise the boundaries of all
the sciences run together, and none of them can be dealt with thoroughly
according to its own nature.
G60@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 4 (#5); Ego: 3 (#4),
@3: Sup: 74 (#79); Ego: 70 (#74),
@4: Sup: 12 (#91); Ego: 19 (#93),
@5: Sup: 13 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#94),
@6: Sup: 23 (#127); Ego: 10 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@7: Sup: 12 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%13}); Ego: 70 (#174),
@8: Sup: 22 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 10 (#184 -
I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36}),
Male: #161; Feme: #184
} // #265
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #455 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 -
Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;
THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine appearance
at Elephantine; *I* *AM* *NOT* *RAPACIOUS*.
#VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
#TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
#POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
#TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
#CANON: #102
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_102@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 48 (#52); Ego: 44 (#48),
@3: Sup: 3 (#55); Ego: 36 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@4: Sup: 21 (#76); Ego: 18 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
Male: #76; Feme: #102
} // #102
#265 as [#1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #10, #70, #10] = agoraios (G60): {UMBRA:
#11 as #455 % #41 = #4} 1) in, of or belonging to the market place; 2)
frequenting the market place; 3) *GENERALLY*, *PROPER* *TO* *THE*
*ASSEMBLY*, *SUITED* *TO* *FORENSIC* *SPEAKING*, *BUSINESS*-*LIKE*
*TRANSACTIONS*; 2a) hucksters, petty traffickers, retail dealers; 2b)
idlers, loungers, *THE* *COMMON* *SORT*, *LOW*, *MEAN* *VULGAR*;
"But the Jews which believed not, moved with envy, took unto them
certain lewd fellows of the baser {#265 as [#1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #10,
#70, #10] = agoraios (G60): baser} sort, and gathered a company, and set
all the city on an uproar, and assaulted the house of Jason {he that
cures}, and sought to bring them out to the people." [Acts 17:5 (KJV)]
G2807@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 50 (#70); Ego: 30 (#50),
@3: Sup: 55 (#125); Ego: 5 (#55),
@4: Sup: 65 (#190); Ego: 10 (#65),
@5: Sup: 22 (#212); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #212; Feme: #103
} // #265
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #265 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;
THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; *I* *COMMIT* *NOT* *ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.
#VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
#TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
#POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
#TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
#CANON: #180
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
@1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
@2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
@3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
@4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
Male: #135; Feme: #180
} // #180
#265 as [#20, #30, #5, #10, #200] = kleis (G2807): {UMBRA: #13 as #265 %
#41 = #19} 1) *A* *KEY*; 1a) since the keeper of the keys has the power
to open and to shut; 1b) metaph. in the NT to denote power and authority
of various kinds;
"And I will give unto thee the keys {#265 as [#20, #30, #5, #10, #200] =
kleis (G2807): key} of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever- thou shalt
bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose
on earth shall be loosed in heaven." [Matthew 16:19 (KJV)]
"Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key {#265 as [#20,
#30, #5, #10, #200] = kleis (G2807): key} of knowledge: ye entered not
in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered." [Luke 11:52
(KJV)]
Whether this *DISTINGUISHING* *FEATURE* *CONSISTS* *IN* *A* *DIFFERENCE*
*OF* *THE* *OBJECT* *OR* *THE* *SOURCE* *OF* *COGNITION*, or even of the
type of cognition, or some if not all of these things together, the idea
of the possible science and its territory depends first of all upon it.
G261@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 41 (#42); Ego: 40 (#41),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 1 (#42),
@4: Sup: 51 (#135); Ego: 9 (#51),
@5: Sup: 56 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 5 (#56),
@6: Sup: 66 (#257); Ego: 10 (#66),
@7: Sup: 23 (#280); Ego: 38 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
Male: #280; Feme: #104
} // #266
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #259 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; *I* *HAVE* *NOT* *SLAUGHTERED* *THE* *SACRED* *ANIMALS*.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
#266 as [#1, #40, #1, #9, #5, #10, #200] = amathes (G261): {UMBRA: #15
as #259 % #41 = #13} 1) *UNLEARNED*, *IGNORANT*;
"As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which
are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned
{#266 as [#1, #40, #1, #9, #5, #10, #200] = amathes (G261): unlearned}
and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own
destruction." [2Peter 3:16 (KJV)]
First, concerning the sources of metaphysical cognition, it already lies
in the concept of metaphysics that they cannot be empirical. The
principles of such cognition (which include not only its fundamental
propositions or basic principles, but also its fundamental concepts)
must therefore never be taken from experience; for the cognition is
supposed to be not physical but metaphysical, that is, lying beyond
experience. Therefore it will be based upon neither outer experience,
which constitutes the source of physics proper, nor inner, which
provides the foundation of empirical psychology. It is therefore
cognition a priori, or from pure understanding and pure reason.
H977@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
@3: Sup: 58 (#120); Ego: 2 (#58),
@4: Sup: 66 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND {%31}); Ego: 8
(#66),
@5: Sup: 23 (#209); Ego: 38 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
Male: #209; Feme: #104
} // #266
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #210 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;
THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance
at Re-Stau; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *SLAYER* *OF* *MEN*.
#VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
#TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
#POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
#TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
#CANON: #115
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
@3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
@4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
Male: #118; Feme: #115
} // #115
#266 as [#6, #50, #2, #8, #200] = bachar (H977): {UMBRA: #0 as #210 %
#41 = #5} 1) *TO* *CHOOSE*, *ELECT*, *DECIDE* *FOR*; 1a) (Qal) to
choose; 1b) (Niphal) to be chosen; 1c) (Pual) to be chosen, selected;
"For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God
hath chosen {#266 as [#6, #50, #2, #8, #200] = bachar (H977): choose}
thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon
the face of the earth." [Deuteronomy 7:6 (KJV)]
"The LORD did not set his love upon you, nor choose {#266 as [#6, #50,
#2, #8, #200] = bachar (H977): choose} you, because ye were more in
number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people:"
[Deuteronomy 7:7 (KJV)]
"Then there shall be a place which the LORD your God shall choose {#266
as [#6, #50, #2, #8, #200] = bachar (H977): choose} to cause his name to
dwell there; thither shall ye bring all that I command you; your burnt
offerings, and your sacrifices, your tithes, and the heave offering of
your hand, and all your choice vows which ye vow unto the LORD:"
[Deuteronomy 12:11 (KJV)]
In this, however, there would be nothing to differentiate it from pure
mathematics; it must therefore be denominated pure philosophical
cognition; but concerning the meaning of this expression I refer to the
Critique of Pure Reason, pp. 712 f.,1 where the distinction between
these two types of use of reason has been presented clearly and
sufficiently. – So much on the sources of metaphysical cognition.
[CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any
Future Metaphysics, IDEA @266]
#2 - Concerning the kind of knowledge which can alone be called metaphysical
a. On the distinction between analytical and synthetical judgments in
general
Analytical judgments are explicative. They express nothing in the
predicate but what has already been actually thought in the concept of
the subject. Synthetical judgments are expansive. The predicate contains
something that is not actually thought in the concept of the subject. It
amplifies knowledge by adding something to the subject's concept.
b. The common principle of all analytical judgments is the law of
*CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as
#310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*,
*CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}
The predicate of an affirmative analytical judgment is already contained
in the concept of the subject, of which it cannot be denied without
*CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as
#310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*,
*CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}. All analytical judgments are a
priori.
c. Synthetical judgments require a principle that is different from the
law of *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147):
{#9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*,
*CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}.
@1. Judgments of experience are always synthetical.
Analytical judgments are not based on experience. They are based merely
on the subject's concept.
@2. Mathematical judgments are all synthetical.
Pure mathematical knowledge is different from all other a priori
knowledge. It is synthetical and cannot be known from mere conceptual
analysis. Mathematics require the intuitive construction of concepts.
Arithmetical sums are the result of the addition of intuited counters.
Geometrical concepts, such as "shortest distance," are known only
through intuition.
@3. Metaphysical judgments, properly so called, are all synthetical.
Concepts and judgments pertaining to metaphysics may be analytical.
These may not be metaphysical but can be combined to make a priori,
synthetical, metaphysical judgments. For example, the analytical
judgment "substance only exists as subject" can be used to make the
judgment "all substance is permanent," which is a synthetical and
properly metaphysical judgment. [Wikipedia
2018:Prolegomena_to_Any_Future_Metaphysics]
ON THE TYPE OF COGNITION THAT ALONE CAN BE CALLED METAPHYSICAL
(a) On the distinction between synthetic and analytic judgments in general
H1261@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 11 (#17); Ego: 5 (#11),
@3: Sup: 13 (#30); Ego: 2 (#13),
@4: Sup: 51 (#81); Ego: 38 (#51),
@5: Sup: 55 (#136); Ego: 4 (#55),
@6: Sup: 65 (#201); Ego: 10 (#65),
@7: Sup: 24 (#225); Ego: 40 (#105),
Male: #225; Feme: #105
} // #267
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #206 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.
#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
#TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
#POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
#TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_45@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 2 (#3); Ego: 1 (#2),
@3: Sup: 43 (#46); Ego: 41 (#43),
@4: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 2 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
Male: #91; Feme: #45
} // #45
#267 as [#6, #5, #2, #200, #4, #10, #40] = barod (H1261): {UMBRA: #3 as
#206 % #41 = #1} 1) spotted, marked;
"And it came to pass at the time that the cattle conceived, that I
lifted up mine eyes, and saw in a dream, and, behold, the rams which
leaped upon the cattle were ringstreaked, speckled, and grisled {#267 as
[#6, #5, #2, #200, #4, #10, #40] = barod (H1261): grisled}." [Genesis
31:10 (KJV)]
"And he said, Lift up now thine eyes, and see, all the rams which leap
upon the cattle are ringstreaked, speckled, and grisled {#267 as [#6,
#5, #2, #200, #4, #10, #40] = barod (H1261): grisled}: for I have seen
all that Laban {white; shining; gentle; brittle} doeth unto thee."
[Genesis 31:12 (KJV)]
Metaphysical *COGNITION* *MUST* *CONTAIN* *NOTHING* *BUT* *JUDGMENTS*
*A* *PRIORI*, *AS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *DISTINGUISHING* *FEATURE* *OF*
*ITS* *SOURCES*. But *JUDGMENTS* may have any origin whatsoever, or be
constituted in whatever manner according to their logical form, and yet
there is nonetheless a distinction between them according to their
content, by dint of which they are either merely explicative and add
nothing to the content of the cognition, or ampliative and augment the
given cognition; the first may be called analytic *JUDGMENTS*, the
second synthetic.
H7328@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 45 (#83); Ego: 7 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
@3: Sup: 55 (#138); Ego: 10 (#55),
@4: Sup: 24 (#162); Ego: 50 (#105),
Male: #162; Feme: #105
} // #267
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #207 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;
THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *MAN* *OF* *VIOLENCE*.
#VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
#TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
#TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
#CANON: #84
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
@3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
@4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
Male: #71; Feme: #84
} // #84
#267 as [#200, #7, #10, #50] = raz (Aramaic) (H7328): {UMBRA: #6 as #207
% #41 = #2} 1) *SECRET*;
"Daniel {judgment of God; God my judge} answered in the presence of the
king, and said, The secret {#267 as [#200, #7, #10, #50] = raz (Aramaic)
(H7328): secret} which the king hath demanded cannot- the wise men, the
astrologers, the magicians, the soothsayers, show unto the king; But
there is a God in heaven that revealeth secrets {#267 as [#200, #7, #10,
#50] = raz (Aramaic) (H7328): secret}, and maketh known to the king
Nebuchadnezzar {tears and groans of judgment} what shall be in the
latter days. Thy dream, and the visions of thy head upon thy bed, are
these; As for thee, O king, thy thoughts came into thy mind upon thy
bed, what should come to pass hereafter-: and he that revealeth secrets
{#267 as [#200, #7, #10, #50] = raz (Aramaic) (H7328): secret} maketh
known to thee what shall come to pass. But as for me, this secret {#267
as [#200, #7, #10, #50] = raz (Aramaic) (H7328): secret} is not revealed
to me for any wisdom that I have more than any living, but for their
sakes that shall make known the interpretation to the king, and that
thou mightest know the thoughts of thy heart." [Daniel 2:27-30 (KJV)]
"The king answered unto Daniel {judgment of God; God my judge}, and
said, Of a truth it is, that your God is a God of gods, and a Lord of
kings, and a revealer of secrets {#267 as [#200, #7, #10, #50] = raz
(Aramaic) (H7328): secret}, seeing thou couldest reveal this secret
{#267 as [#200, #7, #10, #50] = raz (Aramaic) (H7328): secret}." [Daniel
2:47]
Analytic *JUDGMENTS* say nothing in the predicate except what was
actually thought already in the concept of the subject, though not so
clearly nor with the same consciousness. If I say: All bodies are
extended, then I have not in the least amplified my concept of body, but
have merely resolved it, since extension, although not explicitly said
of the former concept prior to the judgment, nevertheless was actually
thought of it; the judgment is therefore analytic. By contrast, the
proposition: Some bodies are heavy, contains something in the predicate
that is not actually thought in the general concept of body; it
therefore augments my cognition, since it adds something to my concept,
and must therefore be called a synthetic judgment. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN
THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics,
IDEA @267]
(b) The common principle of all analytic judgments is the principle of
*CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as
#310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*,
*CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}
All analytic judgments rest entirely on the principle of *CONTRADICTION*
{#312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23}
1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE*
*ENCOUNTER*} and are by their nature a priori cognitions, whether the
concepts that serve for their material be empirical or not. For since
the predicate of an affirmative analytic judgment is already thought
beforehand in the concept of the subject, it cannot be denied of that
subject without *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy
(H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*,
*ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}; exactly so is its
opposite necessarily denied of the subject in an analytic, but negative,
judgment, and indeed also according to the principle of *CONTRADICTION*
{#312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23}
1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE*
*ENCOUNTER*}. So it stands with the propositions: Every body is
extended, and: No body is unextended (simple).
G1272@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
@4: Sup: 65 (#98); Ego: 50 (#65),
@5: Sup: 54 (#152); Ego: 70 (#135),
@6: Sup: 64 (#216); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 67 (#283); Ego: 3 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@8: Sup: 56 (#339); Ego: 70 (#218),
@9: Sup: 25 (#364); Ego: 50 (#268),
Male: #364; Feme: #268
} // #268
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #948 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;
THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance
at Re-Stau; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *SLAYER* *OF* *MEN*.
#VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
#TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
#POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
#TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
#CANON: #115
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
@3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
@4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
Male: #118; Feme: #115
} // #115
#268 as [#4, #10, #1, #50, #70, #10, #3, #70, #50] = dianoigo (G1272):
{UMBRA: #10 as #948 % #41 = #5} 1) to open by dividing or drawing
asunder, to open thoroughly (what had been closed); 1a) a male opening
the womb (the closed matrix), ie. the first-born; 1b) of the eyes and
the ears; 1c) *TO* *OPEN* *THE* *MIND* *OF* *ONE*, *IE*. *TO* *CAUSE*
*TO* *UNDERSTAND* *A* *THING*; 1c1) *TO* *OPEN* *ONE'S* *SOUL*, *IE*.
*TO* *ROUSE* *IN* *ONE* *THE* *FACULTY* *OF* *UNDERSTANDING* *OR* *THE*
*DESIRE* *OF* *LEARNING*;
"And their eyes were opened {#268 as [#4, #10, #1, #50, #70, #10, #3,
#70, #50] = dianoigo (G1272): open}, and they knew him; and he vanished-
out of their sight. And they said one to another, Did not our heart burn
within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened {#268
as [#4, #10, #1, #50, #70, #10, #3, #70, #50] = dianoigo (G1272): open}
to us the scriptures?" [Luke 24:31-32 (KJV)]
"Then opened {#268 as [#4, #10, #1, #50, #70, #10, #3, #70, #50] =
dianoigo (G1272): open} he their understanding, that they might
understand the scriptures," [Luke 24:45 (KJV)]
"And a certain woman named Lydia, a seller of purple, of the city of
Thyatira, which worshipped God, heard us: whose heart the Lord opened
{#268 as [#4, #10, #1, #50, #70, #10, #3, #70, #50] = dianoigo (G1272):
open}, that she attended unto the things which were spoken of Paul."
[Acts 16:14 (KJV)]
For that reason all analytic propositions are still a priori judgments
even if their concepts are empirical, as in: Gold is a yellow metal; for
in order to know this, I need no further experience outside my concept
of gold, which includes that this body is yellow and a metal; for this
constitutes my very concept, and I did not have to do anything except
analyze it, without looking beyond it to something else.
(c) Synthetic judgments require a principle other than the principle of
*CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as
#310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*,
*CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}
H633@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 7 (#13); Ego: 1 (#7),
@3: Sup: 67 (#80); Ego: 60 (#67),
@4: Sup: 24 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 38 (#105),
@5: Sup: 25 (#129); Ego: 1 (#106),
Male: #129; Feme: #106
} // #268
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #261 % #41 = #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of
Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning;
Tetra: 1 - Centre;
THOTH MEASURE: #15 - Oh Lord of Righteousness, who makest thine
appearance in the place of Righteousness; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A*
*LAND*-*GRABBER*.
#VIRTUE: With Reach (no. #15), dailys increasing its kind.
#TOOLS: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily depleting its type.
#POSITION: With Resistance (no. #22), intolerance, but
#TIME: With Unity (no. #54), magnanimity.
#CANON: #146
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_146@{
@1: Sup: 15 (#15); Ego: 15 (#15),
@2: Sup: 70 (#85); Ego: 55 (#70),
@3: Sup: 11 (#96); Ego: 22 (#92),
@4: Sup: 65 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 54 (#146 -
I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
Male: #161; Feme: #146
} // #146
#268 as [#6, #1, #60, #200, #1] = 'ecar (Aramaic) (H633): {UMBRA: #1 as
#261 % #41 = #15} 1) interdict, decree, decree of restriction;
"All the presidents of the kingdom, the governors, and the princes, the
counsellors, and the captains, have consulted together to establish a
royal statute, and to make a firm decree {#268 as [#6, #1, #60, #200,
#1] = 'ecar (Aramaic) (H633): decree}, that whosoever shall ask a
petition of any God or man for thirty days, save of thee, O king, he
shall be cast into the den of lions." [Daniel 6:7 (KJV)]
There are synthetic judgments a posteriori whose origin is empirical;
but there are also synthetic judgments that are a priori certain and
that arise from pure understanding and reason. Both however agree in
this, that they can by no means arise solely from the principle of
analysis, namely the principle of *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100,
#200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*,
*CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*};
they demand yet a completely different principle, though they always
must be derived from some fundamental proposition, whichever it may be,
in accordance with the principle of *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100,
#200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*,
*CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}; for
nothing can run counter to this principle, even though everything cannot
be derived from it. I shall first classify the synthetic judgments.
[CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any
Future Metaphysics, IDEA @268]
1. Judgments of experience are always synthetic. For it would be absurd
to base an analytic judgment on experience, since I do not at all need
to go beyond my concept in order to formulate the judgment and therefore
have no need for any testimony from experience. That a body is extended,
is a proposition that stands certain a priori, and not a judgment of
experience.
For before I go to experience, I have all the conditions for my judgment
already in the concept, from which I merely extract the predicate in
accordance with the principle of *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100,
#200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*,
*CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}, and
by this means can simultaneously become conscious of the necessity of
the judgment, which experience could never teach me.
G2058@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 24 (#29); Ego: 19 (#24),
@3: Sup: 64 (#93); Ego: 40 (#64),
@4: Sup: 72 (#165); Ego: 8 (#72),
@5: Sup: 41 (#206); Ego: 50 (#122),
@6: Sup: 46 (#252); Ego: 5 (#127),
@7: Sup: 56 (#308); Ego: 10 (#137),
@8: Sup: 57 (#365); Ego: 1 (#138),
@9: Sup: 26 (#391); Ego: 50 (#188),
Male: #391; Feme: #188
} // #269
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #219 % #41 = #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics);
I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 -
Branching Out;
THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
Mabit; I deal not fraudulently.
#VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but
#TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
#POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
#TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
#CANON: #140
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_140@{
@1: Sup: 14 (#14); Ego: 14 (#14),
@2: Sup: 68 (#82); Ego: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@3: Sup: 79 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 11 (#79),
@4: Sup: 59 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 61 (#140 - I DEAL
NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #220; Feme: #140
} // #140
#269 as [#5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #10, #1, #50] = hermeneia (G2058):
{UMBRA: #3 as #219 % #41 = #14} 1) *INTERPRETATION*; 1a) *OF* *WHAT*
*HAS* *BEEN* *SPOKEN* *MORE* *OR* *LESS* *OBSCURELY* *BY* *OTHERS*;
"To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another
discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another
the interpretation {#269 as [#5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #10, #1, #50] =
hermeneia (G2058): interpretation} of tongues:" [1Corinthians 12:10 (KJV)]
"How is it then, brethren? when ye come together, every one of you hath
a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an
interpretation {#269 as [#5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #10, #1, #50] =
hermeneia (G2058): interpretation}. Let all things be done unto
edifying." [1Corinthians 14:26 (KJV)]
2. Mathematical judgments are one and all synthetic. *THIS*
*PROPOSITION* *APPEARS* *TO* *HAVE* *COMPLETELY* *ESCAPED* *THE*
*OBSERVATIONS* *OF* *ANALYSTS* *OF* *HUMAN* *REASON* *UP* *TO* *THE*
*PRESENT*, *AND* *INDEED* *TO* *BE* *DIRECTLY* *OPPOSED* *TO* *ALL* *OF*
*THEIR* *CONJECTURES*, *ALTHOUGH* *IT* *IS* *INCONTROVERTIBLY* *CERTAIN*
*AND* *VERY* *IMPORTANT* *IN* *ITS* *CONSEQUENCES*. Because they found
that the inferences of the mathematicians all proceed in accordance with
the principle of *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy
(H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*,
*ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*} (which, by nature,
is required of any apodictic certainty), they were persuaded that the
fundamental propositions were also known through the principle of
*CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as
#310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*,
*CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}, in which they were very
mistaken; for a synthetic proposition can of course be discerned in
accordance with the principle of *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100,
#200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*,
*CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}, but
only insofar as another synthetic proposition is presupposed from which
the first can be deduced, never however in itself.
First of all it must be observed: that properly mathematical
propositions are always a priori and not empirical judgments, because
they carry necessity with them, which cannot be taken from experience.
But if this will not be granted me, very well, I will restrict my
proposition to pure mathematics, the concept of which already conveys
that it contains not empirical but only pure cognition a priori.
One might well at first think: that the proposition 7 + 5 = 12 is a
purely analytic proposition that follows from the concept of a sum of
seven and five according to the principle of *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as
[#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1)
*OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE*
*ENCOUNTER*}. However, upon closer inspection, one finds that the
concept of the sum of 7 and 5 contains nothing further than the
unification of the two numbers into one, through which by no means is
thought what this single number may be that combines the two. The
concept of twelve is in no way already thought because I merely think to
myself this unification of seven and five, and I may analyze my concept
of such a possible sum for as long as may be, still I will not meet with
twelve therein. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @269]
G3911@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 24 (#204); Ego: 5 (#105),
@5: Sup: 74 (#278); Ego: 50 (#155),
@6: Sup: 79 (#357); Ego: 5 (#160),
@7: Sup: 1 (#358); Ego: 3 (#163),
@8: Sup: 21 (#379); Ego: 20 (#183),
@9: Sup: 26 (#405); Ego: 5 (#188),
Male: #405; Feme: #188
} // #269
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #1587 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;
THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *CURSING*.
#VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
#TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
#POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
#TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
#CANON: #177
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
@1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
@2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
@3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
@4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177
#269 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5] = paraphero (G3911):
{UMBRA: #4 as #1587 % #41 = #29} 1) to bear to, bring to, put before; 2)
to lead aside from the right course or path, to carry away; 3) to carry
past, lead past; 3a) to cause to pass by, to remove;
"And he said, Abba, Father, all things are possible unto thee; take
{#269 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5] = paraphero (G3911):
take} away {#269 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5] =
paraphero (G3911): take} this cup from me: nevertheless not what I will,
but what thou wilt." [Mark 14:36 (KJV)]
"Saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove {#269 as [#80, #1, #100, #5,
#50, #5, #3, #20, #5] = paraphero (G3911): take} this cup from me:
nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done." [Luke 22:42 (KJV)]
*ONE* *MUST* *GO* *BEYOND* *THESE* *CONCEPTS*, *IN* *MAKING* *USE* *OF*
*THE* *INTUITION* *THAT* *CORRESPONDS* to one of the two, such as one’s
five fingers, or (like Segner in his arithmetic) five points, and in
that manner adding the units of the five given in intuition step by step
to the concept of seven. One therefore truly amplifies one’s concept
through this proposition 7 + 5 = 12 and adds to the first concept a new
one that was not thought in it; that is, an arithmetical proposition is
always synthetic, which can be seen all the more plainly in the case of
somewhat larger numbers, for it is then clearly evident that, though we
may turn and twist our concept as we like, we could never find the sum
through the mere analysis of our concepts, without making use of intuition.
Nor is any fundamental proposition of pure geometry analytic. That the
straight line between two points is the shortest is a synthetic
proposition. For my concept of the straight contains nothing of
magnitude, but only a quality. The concept of the shortest is therefore
wholly an addition and cannot be extracted by any analysis from the
concept of the straight line. *INTUITION* *MUST* *THEREFORE* *BE* *MADE*
*USE* *OF* *HERE*, *BY* *MEANS* *OF* *WHICH* *ALONE* *THE* *SYNTHESIS*
*IS* *POSSIBLE*.
H6049@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 46 (#52); Ego: 40 (#46),
@3: Sup: 35 (#87); Ego: 70 (#116),
@4: Sup: 41 (#128); Ego: 6 (#122),
@5: Sup: 10 (#138); Ego: 50 (#172),
@6: Sup: 60 (#198); Ego: 50 (#222),
@7: Sup: 70 (#268); Ego: 10 (#232),
@8: Sup: 29 (#297); Ego: 40 (#272),
Male: #297; Feme: #272
} // #272
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #170 % #41 = #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form;
I-Ching: H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence;
Tetra: 66 - Departure;
THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; I*I* *AM* *NOT* *FRAUDULENT* *IN* *MEASURES* *OF* *GRAIN*.
#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal *CONTRADICTION*.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_182@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 52 (#58); Ego: 46 (#52),
@3: Sup: 34 (#92); Ego: 63 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@4: Sup: 20 (#112); Ego: 67 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
Male: #112; Feme: #182
} // #182
#272 as [#6, #40, #70, #6, #50, #50, #10, #40] = `anan (H6049): {UMBRA:
#6 as #170 % #41 = #6} 1) (Piel) to make appear, produce, bring
(clouds); 2) (Poel) to practise soothsaying, conjure; 2a) to observe
times, practice soothsaying or spiritism or magic or augury or
witchcraft; 2b) soothsayer, enchanter, sorceress, diviner,
fortuneteller, barbarian, Meonenim {charmers, regarders of times}
(participle);
"Therefore hearken not ye to your prophets, nor to your diviners, nor to
your dreamers, nor to your enchanters {#272 as [#6, #40, #70, #6, #50,
#50, #10, #40] = `anan (H6049): observer}, nor to your sorcerers, which
speak unto you, saying, Ye shall not serve the king of Babylon
{incongruity; confusion; mixture}:" [Jeremiah 27:9 (KJV)]
Some other fundamental propositions that geometers presuppose are indeed
actually analytic and rest on the principle of *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as
[#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1)
*OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE*
*ENCOUNTER*}; how- ever, they serve only, like identical propositions,
as links in the chain of method and not as principles: e.g., a = a, the
whole is equal to itself, or (a + b) > a, that is, the whole is greater
than its part. And indeed even these, al- though they are valid from
concepts alone, are admitted into mathematics only because they can be
exhibited in intuition.
G640@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 81 (#82); Ego: 80 (#81),
@3: Sup: 70 (#152); Ego: 70 (#151),
@4: Sup: 8 (#160); Ego: 19 (#170),
@5: Sup: 18 (#178); Ego: 10 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
@6: Sup: 19 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 1 (#181
- I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT
ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
@7: Sup: 29 (#226); Ego: 10 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
Male: #226; Feme: #191
} // #272
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #262 % #41 = #16 - Being a Guide, Returning to the Root; I-Ching:
H28 - Major Superiority, Excess, Great Exceeding, Preponderance of the
great, Critical mass; Tetra: 75 - Failure;
THOTH MEASURE: #16 - Oh thou who turnest backwards, who makest thine
appearance in Bubastis; *I* *AM* *NOT* *AN* *EAVES*-*DROPPER*.
#VIRTUE: Contact (no. #16) means mutual compliance.
#TOOLS: Closed Mouth (no. #56) means no contact.
#POSITION: With Increase (no. #13), daily additions, but
#TIME: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily reductions.
#CANON: #140
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_140@{
@1: Sup: 16 (#16); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 72 (#88); Ego: 56 (#72),
@3: Sup: 4 (#92); Ego: 13 (#85),
@4: Sup: 59 (#151); Ego: 55 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} /
I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #151; Feme: #140
} // #140
#272 as [#1, #80, #70, #100, #10, #1, #10] = aporia (G640): {UMBRA: #8
as #262 % #41 = #16} 1) *THE* *STATE* *OF* *ONE* *WHO* *IS* *IN*
*PERPLEXITY*;
"And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars;
and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity {#272 as [#1,
#80, #70, #100, #10, #1, #10] = aporia (G640): perplexity}; the sea and
the waves roaring;" [Luke 21:25 (KJV)]
It is *MERELY* *AMBIGUITY* *OF* *EXPRESSION* which makes us commonly
believe here that the predicate of such apodictic judgments already lies
in our concept and that the judgment is therefore analytic. Namely, we
are required to add in thought a particular predicate to a given
concept, and this necessity is already attached to the concepts. But the
question is not, what we are required to add in thought to a given
concept, but *WHAT* *WE* *ACTUALLY* *THINK* *IN* *IT*, *EVEN* *IF*
*ONLY* *OBSCURELY*, and then it becomes evident that the predicate
attaches to such concepts indeed necessarily, though not immediately,
but rather through an intuition that has to be added. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS
IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future
Metaphysics, IDEA @272]
The essential feature of pure mathematical cognition, differentiating it
from all other a priori cognition, is that it must throughout proceed
not from concepts, but always and only through the construction of
concepts (Critique, p. 713). Because pure mathematical cognition, in its
propositions, must therefore go beyond the concept to that which is
contained in the intuition corresponding to it, its propositions can and
must never arise through the analysis of concepts, that is,
analytically, and so are one and all synthetic.
H3080@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 40 (#70); Ego: 10 (#40),
@3: Sup: 45 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}); Ego: 5 (#45 - I
AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
@4: Sup: 51 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 6 (#51),
@5: Sup: 61 (#227); Ego: 10 (#61),
@6: Sup: 18 (#245); Ego: 38 (#99),
@7: Sup: 28 (#273); Ego: 10 (#109),
@8: Sup: 30 (#303); Ego: 2 (#111),
Male: #303; Feme: #111
} // #273
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #243 % #41 = #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching:
H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of
the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;
THOTH MEASURE: #38 - Oh thou who makest mortals to flourish, and who
makest thine appearance at Sais; *I* *CURSE* *NOT* *A* *GOD*.
#VIRTUE: Fullness (no. #38) means the prime of life, but
#TOOLS: On the Verge (no. #78) means old age.
#POSITION: With Kinship (no. #34), attachment between even distant
relatives.
#TIME: With Severance (no. #70), offense to one’s own flesh and blood.
#CANON: #220
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_220@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 35 (#73); Ego: 78 (#116),
@3: Sup: 69 (#142); Ego: 34 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@4: Sup: 58 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
70 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}),
Male: #200; Feme: #220
} // #220
#273 as [#30, #10, #5, #6, #10, #200, #10, #2] = Yehowyariyb (H3080):
{UMBRA: #7 as #243 % #41 = #38} {fighting, or multiplying, of the Lord}
1) A priest in Jerusalem; 2) the head of the 1st of the 24 *COURSES*
*OF* *PRIESTS* in David's time;
THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *COURSES* *OF*
*PRIESTS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated
to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = #2184 days;
THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of
20 March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.
THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: REMEMBER
THE SABBATH DAY TO KEEP IT HOLY {ACT TO WILL V'S WILL TO ACT}
#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE +
#728 - REACTANCE +
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13}
G2209@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
@2: Sup: 15 (#22); Ego: 8 (#15),
@3: Sup: 55 (#77); Ego: 40 (#55),
@4: Sup: 65 (#142); Ego: 10 (#65),
@5: Sup: 66 (#208); Ego: 1 (#66),
@6: Sup: 23 (#231); Ego: 38 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
Male: #231; Feme: #104
} // #266
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #66 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
Distortion;
THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
Unsit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *BOISTEROUS* *IN* *BEHAVIOUR*.
#VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
#TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
#TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
#CANON: #185
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_185@{
@1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
@2: Sup: 9 (#34); Ego: 65 (#90),
@3: Sup: 51 (#85); Ego: 42 (#132),
@4: Sup: 23 (#108); Ego: 53 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
Male: #108; Feme: #185
} // #185
#266 as [#7, #8, #40, #10, #1, #200] = zemia (G2209): {UMBRA: #16 as #66
% #41 = #25} 1) *DAMAGE*, *LOSS*;
"Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss {#266 as [#7, #8, #40,
#10, #1, #200] = zemia (G2209): loss} for the excellency of the
knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of
all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ,"
[Philippians 3:8 (KJV)]
I cannot, however, refrain from noting the *DAMAGE* that neglect of this
otherwise seemingly insignificant and unimportant observation has
brought upon philosophy. Hume, when he felt the call, worthy of a
philosopher, to cast his gaze over the entire field of pure a priori
cognition, in which the human understanding claims such vast holdings,
inadvertently lopped off a whole (and indeed the most considerable)
province of the same, *NAMELY* *PURE* *MATHEMATICS*, *BY* *IMAGINING*
*THAT* *THE* *NATURE* *AND* *SO* *TO* *SPEAK* *THE* *LEGAL*
*CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *RESTED* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
*DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, *NAMELY* *SOLELY* *ON* *THE* *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as
#310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*,
*CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}; and although he had by no means
made a classification of propositions as formally and generally, or with
the nomenclature, as I have here, it was nonetheless just as if he had
said: Pure mathematics contains only analytic propositions, but
metaphysics contains synthetic propositions a priori. Now he erred
severely in this, and this error had decisively damaging consequences
for his entire conception. For had he not done this, he would have
expanded his question about the origin of our synthetic judgments far
beyond his metaphysical concept of causality and extended it also to the
possibility of a priori mathematics; for he would have had to accept
mathematics as synthetic as well. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF
PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @273]
H5504@{
@1: Sup: 60 (#60); Ego: 60 (#60),
@2: Sup: 68 (#128); Ego: 8 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@3: Sup: 25 (#153); Ego: 38 (#106),
@4: Sup: 30 (#183); Ego: 5 (#111),
Male: #183; Feme: #111
} // #273
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #268 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;
THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; *I*
*AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.
#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175
#273 as [#60, #8, #200, #5] = cachar (H5504): {UMBRA: #8 as #268 % #41 =
#22} 1) traffic, gain, profit, *GAIN* *FROM* *MERCHANDISE*; 1a) traffic,
gain from traffic;
But then he would by no means have been able to found his metaphysical
propositions on mere experience, for otherwise he would have had to
subject the axioms of pure mathematics to experience as well, which he
was much too reasonable to do. The good company in which metaphysics
would then have come to be situated would have secured it against the
danger of scornful mistreatment; for the blows that were intended for
the latter would have had to strike the former as well, which was not
his intention, and could not have been; and so the acute man would have
been drawn into reflections which must have been similar to those with
which we are now occupied, but which would have gained infinitely from
his inimitably fine presentation.
3. Properly metaphysical judgments are one and all synthetic. Judgments
belonging to metaphysics must be distinguished from properly meta-
physical judgments. Very many among the former are analytic, but they
merely provide the means to metaphysical judgments, toward which the aim
of the science is completely directed, and which are always synthetic.
For if concepts belong to metaphysics, e.g., that of substance, then the
judgments arising from their mere analysis necessarily belong to meta-
physics as well, e.g., substance is that which exists only as subject,
etc., and through several such analytic judgments we try to approach the
definition of those concepts. Since, however, the analysis of a pure
concept of the understanding (such as metaphysics contains) does not
proceed in a different manner from the analysis of any other, even
empirical, concept which does not belong to metaphysics (e.g., air is an
elastic fluid, the elasticity of which is not lost with any known degree
of cold), therefore the concept may indeed be properly metaphysical, but
not the analytic judgment; for this science possesses something special
and *PROPER* *TO* *IT* *IN* *THE* *GENERATION* *OF* *ITS* *A* *PRIORI*
*COGNITIONS*,
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] {
HOMOIOS
HETEROS
KABBALAH
AS DEFINED
} ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - Remember the
Sabbath]) ...
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#82 -
Honour your parents]) ...
#65 (@2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
- Do not kill]) ...
#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
#175 (@4 - Nature Amended in its Nature: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
- Do not steal]) ...
#260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
Bear no false witness]) ...
#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - Covet Not])
*WHICH* *GENERATION* *MUST* *THEREFORE* *BE* *DISTINGUISHED* *FROM
*WHAT* *THIS* *SCIENCE* *HAS* *IN* *COMMON* *WITH* *ALL* *OTHER*
*COGNITIONS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*; thus, e.g., the proposition:
All that is substance in things persists, is a synthetic and properly
metaphysical proposition.
G1074@{
@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
@2: Sup: 8 (#11); Ego: 5 (#8),
@3: Sup: 58 (#69); Ego: 50 (#58),
@4: Sup: 63 (#132); Ego: 5 (#63),
@5: Sup: 64 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 1 (#64),
@6: Sup: 74 (#270); Ego: 10 (#74),
@7: Sup: 31 (#301); Ego: 38 (#112),
Male: #301; Feme: #112
} // #274
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #64 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch;
Tetra: 26 - Endeavour;
THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
appearance in Urit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *HOT* *OF* *SPEECH*.
#VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
#TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
#POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
#TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
#CANON: #158
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_158@{
@1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
@2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
@4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I
AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
Male: #156; Feme: #158
} // #158
#274 as [#3, #5, #50, #5, #1, #10, #200] = genea (G1074): {UMBRA: #7 as
#64 % #41 = #23} 1) fathered, birth, nativity; 2) that which has been
begotten, men of the same stock, a family; 3) the whole multitude of men
living at the same time; 4) an age (ie. the time ordinarily occupied be
each successive generation), a space of 30 - 33 years; 2a) the several
ranks of natural descent, the successive members of a genealogy; 2b)
*METAPHOR*: *A* *RACE* *OF* *MEN* *VERY* *LIKE* *EACH* *OTHER* *IN*
*ENDOWMENTS*, *PURSUITS*, *CHARACTER*; 2b1) *ESPECIALLY* *IN* *A* *BAD*
*SENSE*, *A* *PERVERSE* *RACE*;
"But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation
{#274 as [#3, #5, #50, #5, #1, #10, #200] = genea (G1074): generation}
seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the
sign of the prophet Jonas:" [Matthew 12:39 (KJV)]
"The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation {#274 as
[#3, #5, #50, #5, #1, #10, #200] = genea (G1074): generation}, and shall
condemn it: because they repented at the preaching of Jonas; and,
behold, a greater than Jonas is here. "The queen of the south shall rise
up in the judgment with this generation {#274 as [#3, #5, #50, #5, #1,
#10, #200] = genea (G1074): generation}, and shall condemn it: for she
came from the uttermost parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of
Solomon; and, behold, a greater than Solomon is here." [Matthew 12:41-42
(KJV)]
"Then goeth he, and taketh with himself seven other spirits more wicked
than himself, and they enter in and dwell there: and the last state of
that man is worse than the first. Even so shall it be also unto this
wicked generation {#274 as [#3, #5, #50, #5, #1, #10, #200] = genea
(G1074): generation}." [Matthew 12:45 (KJV)]
"A wicked and adulterous generation {#274 as [#3, #5, #50, #5, #1, #10,
#200] = genea (G1074): generation} seeketh after a sign; and there shall
no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas. And he left
them, and departed." [Matthew 16:4 (KJV)]
"Then Jesus answered and said, O faithless and perverse generation {#274
as [#3, #5, #50, #5, #1, #10, #200] = genea (G1074): generation}, how
long shall I be with you? how long shall I suffer you? bring him hither
to me." [Matthew 17:17 (KJV)]
"Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation
{#274 as [#3, #5, #50, #5, #1, #10, #200] = genea (G1074): generation}."
[Matthew 23:36 (KJV)]
"Verily I say unto you, This generation {#274 as [#3, #5, #50, #5, #1,
#10, #200] = genea (G1074): generation} shall not pass, till all these
things be fulfilled." [Matthew 24:34 (KJV)]
"That ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke,
in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation {#274 as [#3, #5, #50, #5,
#1, #10, #200] = genea (G1074): generation}, among whom ye shine as
lights in the world;" [Philippians 2:15 (KJV)]
41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}
"AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {
#I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
#N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 -
Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
#R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS
THY NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1
SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
#I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO
which is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}
INRI@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
Male: #114; Feme: #108
} // #270
#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
same light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
*GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 -
TORAH} - Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
each other {Latin CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}.
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
[IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:
Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).
*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage /
sovereign dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus}
Empire Governance]
If one has previously assembled, according to fixed principles, the a
priori concepts that constitute the matter of metaphysics and its
building material, then the analysis of these concepts is of great
value; it can even be presented separately from all the synthetic
propositions that constitute metaphysics itself, as a special part (as
it were as philosophia definitiva) containing nothing but analytic
propositions belonging to metaphysics. For in fact such analyses do not
have much use anywhere except in metaphysics, that is, with a view
toward the synthetic propositions that are to be *GENERATED* *FROM*
*SUCH* *PREVIOUSLY* *ANALYZED* *CONCEPTS*.
G1383@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 74 (#78); Ego: 70 (#74),
@3: Sup: 13 (#91); Ego: 20 (#94),
@4: Sup: 23 (#114); Ego: 10 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@5: Sup: 63 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 40 (#144),
@6: Sup: 73 (#250); Ego: 10 (#154),
@7: Sup: 62 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*); Ego: 70 (#224),
@8: Sup: 31 (#343); Ego: 50 (#274),
Male: #343; Feme: #274
} // #274
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #274 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;
THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.
#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150
#274 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #10, #70, #50] = dokimion (G1383):
{UMBRA: #8 as #274 % #41 = #28} 1) the proving; 2) *THAT* *BY* *WHICH*
*SOMETHING* *IS* *TRIED* *OR* *PROVED*, *A* *TEST*;
"Knowing this, that the trying {#274 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #10,
#70, #50] = dokimion (G1383): trying} of your faith worketh patience."
[James 1:3 (KJV)]
"That the trial {#274 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #10, #70, #50] =
dokimion (G1383): trying} of your faith, being much more precious than
of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found
unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ:"
[1Peter 1:7 (KJV)]
The conclusion of this section is therefore: that metaphysics properly
has to do with synthetic propositions a priori, and these *ALONE*
*CONSTITUTE* *ITS* *AIM*, *FOR* *WHICH* *IT* *INDEED* *REQUIRES* *MANY*
*ANALYSES* *OF* *ITS* *CONCEPTS* (*THEREFORE* *MANY* *ANALYTIC*
*JUDGMENTS*), in which analyses, though, the procedure is no different
from that in any other type of cognition when *ONE* *SEEKS* *SIMPLY*
*TO* *MAKE* *ITS* *CONCEPTS* *CLEAR* *THROUGH* *ANALYSIS*. But the
generation of cognition a priori in accordance with both intuition and
concepts, ultimately of synthetic propositions a priori as well, and
specifically in philosophical cognition, forms the essential content of
metaphysics. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @274]
#3 - A remark on the general division of judgment into analytical and
synthetical.
This division is critical but has not been properly recognized by
previous philosophers.
#4 - The general question of the Prolegomena: Is metaphysics at all
possible?
The Critique of Pure Reason investigates this question synthetically. In
it, an abstract examination of the concepts of the sources of pure
reason results in knowledge of the actual science of metaphysics. The
Prolegomena, on the other hand, starts with the known fact that there is
actual synthetic a priori metaphysical knowledge of pure mathematics and
pure natural science. From this knowledge, analytically, we arrive at
the sources of the possibility of metaphysics.
#5 - The general problem: How is knowledge from pure reason possible?
By using the analytical method, we start from the fact that there are
actual synthetic a priori propositions and then inquire into the
conditions of their possibility. In so doing, we learn the limits of
pure reason. [Wikipedia 2018:Prolegomena_to_Any_Future_Metaphysics]
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE AS HUMAN NATURE BEING THE
DISCRIMINATING NORM}
#7 - All mathematical knowledge consists of concepts that are derived
from intuitions. These intuitions, however, are not based on experience.
#8 - How is it possible to intuit anything a priori? How can the
intuition of the object occur before the experience of the object?
#9 - My intuition of an object can occur before I experience an object
if my intuition contains only the mere form of sensory experience.
SPY POISONING SUSPECTS INTERVIEW 'AN INSULT TO PUBLIC'S INTELLIGENCE'
{#312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23}
1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE*
*ENCOUNTER*}
<https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/13/spy-poisoning-suspects-interview-an-insult-to-publics-intelligence>
These Russian juggernaut jauntas could hardly publicly confess to be
visiting Salisbury, England for the purposes of sex tourism.
Given the repression within their own country you could much less have
them convey on State television that at least one of these has sexual
proclivities for something other than a buxom Russian catalogue bride.
Typical of these cock- {ie. British Slang. nonsense} ologists {ie. any
science or branch of knowledge} is their fixation upon minutiae detail:
#123 metre spire with the construction from 1220 to 1258 and given the
Russian Orthodox Church was founded in 988 AD such erections seem hardly
sufficient impetus.
Such disclosures would amount to illegal activities within that nation
although it would give some credence to the claim of a self-evident
nancy predilection for feminine #274 - *PERFUME*.
H7381@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 48 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 10 (#48),
@3: Sup: 56 (#142); Ego: 8 (#56),
@4: Sup: 25 (#167); Ego: 50 (#106),
@5: Sup: 31 (#198); Ego: 6 (#112),
Male: #198; Feme: #112
} // #274
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #218 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; *I* *HAVE* *NOT* *SLAUGHTERED* *THE* *SACRED* *ANIMALS*
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
#274 as [#200, #10, #8, #50, #6] = reyach (H7381): {UMBRA: #6 as #218 %
#41 = #13} 1) *SCENT*, *FRAGRANCE*, *AROMA*, *ODOUR*; 1a) *SCENT*,
*ODOUR*; 1b) odour of soothing (technical term for sacrifice to God);
"And the LORD smelled a sweet savour {#274 as [#200, #10, #8, #50, #6] =
reyach (H7381): savour}; and the LORD said in his heart, I will not
again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination of
man's heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more
every thing living, as I have done." [Genesis 8:21 (KJV)]
#10 - We can intuit things a priori only through the mere form of
sensuous intuition. In so doing, we can only know objects as they appear
to us, not as they are in themselves, apart from our sensations.
Mathematics is not an analysis of concepts. Mathematical concepts are
constructed from a synthesis of intuitions. Geometry is based on the
pure intuition of space. The arithmetical concept of number is
constructed from the successive addition of units in time. Pure
mechanics uses time to construct motion. Space and time are pure a
priori intuitions. They are the mere forms of our sensations and exist
in us prior to all of our intuitions of objects. Space and time are a
priori knowledge of a sensed object as it appears to an observer.
*INSECTS* *AS* *FLYING* *ANTS* *AT* *TENNIS*
#158 as [#2, #70, #6, #800] = `owph (H5775): {#0 as #158 % #41 = #35} 1)
*FLYING* creatures, fowl, *INSECTS*, birds; 1a) fowl, birds; 1b)
*WINGED* *INSECTS*;
*A* *HUSBAND* *AND* *WIFE* *BEING* *SEIZED* *OR* *OVERTAKEN* *BY* *SOME*
*EVENT* *OR* *OF* *LIGHTENING* *HITTING* *A* *HOUSE*
#158 as [#50, #100, #8] = laqach (H3947): {#1 as #158 % #41 = #35} 1) to
take, get, fetch, lay hold of, seize, receive, acquire, buy, bring,
marry, take a wife, snatch, take away; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to take, take in
the hand; 1a2) to take and carry along; 1a3) to take from, take out of,
take, carry away, take away; 1a4) to take to or for a person, procure,
get, take possession of, select, choose, take in marriage, receive,
accept; 1a5) to take up or upon, put upon; 1a6) to fetch; 1a7) to take,
lead, conduct; 1a8) to take, capture, seize; 1a9) to take, carry off;
1a10) to take (vengeance); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be captured; 1b2) to be
taken away, be removed; 1b3) to be taken, brought unto; 1c) (Pual); 1c1)
to be taken from or out of; 1c2) to be stolen from; 1c3) to be taken
captive; 1c4) to be taken away, be removed; 1d) (Hophal); 1d1) to be
taken unto, be brought unto; 1d2) to be taken out of; 1d3) to be taken
away; 1e) (Hithpael); 1e1) to take hold of oneself; 1e2) *TO* *FLASH*
*ABOUT* (*OF* *LIGHTNING*);
#158 as [#6, #10, #40, #90, #1, #5, #6] = matsa' (H4672): {#4 as #158 %
#41 = #35} 1) to find, attain to; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to find; 1a1a) to
find, secure, acquire, get (thing sought); 1a1b) to find (what is lost);
1a1c) to meet, encounter; 1a1d) to find (a condition); 1a1e) to learn,
devise; 1a2) to find out; 1a2a) to find out; 1a2b) to detect; 1a2c) to
guess; 1a3) to come upon, light upon; 1a3a) to happen upon, meet, fall
in with; 1a3b) to hit; 1a3c) to befall; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be found;
1b1a) to be encountered, be lighted upon, be discovered; 1b1b) to
appear, be recognised; 1b1c) to be discovered, be detected; 1b1d) to be
gained, be secured; 1b2) to be, be found; 1b2a) to be found in; 1b2b) to
be in the possession of; 1b2c) to be found in (a place), happen to be;
1b2d) *TO* *BE* *LEFT* (*AFTER* *WAR*); 1b2e) to be present; 1b2f) to
prove to be; 1b2g) to be found sufficient, be enough; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1)
to cause to find, attain; 1c2) to cause to light upon, come upon, come;
1c3) to cause to encounter; 1c4) to present (offering);
*THOSE* *NASTY* *RUSSIANS* *ARE* *INTERFERING* *IN* *POLITICS* *AGAIN*
*AND* *ITS* *AN* *ACT* *OF* *WAR*
#158 as [#6, #100, #6, #40, #6] = quwm (H6965): {#5 as #158 % #41 = #35}
1) to rise, arise, stand, rise up, stand up; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to arise;
1a2) to arise (hostile sense); 1a3) to arise, become powerful; 1a4) to
arise, come on the scene; 1a5) to stand; 1a5a) to maintain oneself;
1a5b) to be established, be confirmed; 1a5c) to stand, endure; 1a5d) to
be fixed; 1a5e) to be valid; 1a5f) to be proven; 1a5g) to be fulfilled;
1a5h) to persist; 1a5i) to be set, be fixed; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to fulfil;
1b2) *TO* *CONFIRM*, *RATIFY*, *ESTABLISH*, *IMPOSE*; 1c) (Polel) to
raise up; 1d) (Hithpael) to raise oneself, rise up; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1)
to cause to arise, raise; 1e2) to raise, set up, erect, build; 1e3) to
raise up, bring on the scene; 1e4) to raise up, rouse, stir up,
investigate; 1e5) to raise up, constitute; 1e6) to cause to stand, set,
station, establish; 1e7) to make binding; 1e8) to carry out, give effect
to; 1f) (Hophal) to be raised up;
#158 as [#6, #50, #100, #2] = naqab (H5344): {#6 as #158 % #41 = #35}
1) to pierce, perforate, bore, appoint; 2) (Qal) to *CURSE*, blaspheme;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to pierce, bore; 1a2) to prick off, designate; 1b)
(Niphal) to be pricked off, be designated, be specified
#158 as [#6, #2, #5, #100, #5, #10, #30] = qahal (H6950): {#9 as #158 %
#41 = #35} 1) to assemble, gather; 1a) (Niphal) to assemble; 1a1) for
religious reasons; 1a2) for *POLITICAL* *REASONS*; 1b) (Hiphil) to
summon an assembly; 1b1) *FOR* *WAR*, *JUDGMENT*; 1b2) for religious
purposes
#158 as [#8, #30, #100, #500] = cheleq (H2506): {#10 as #158 % #41 =
#35} 1) portion, share, part, territory; 2) smoothness, seductiveness,
flattery; 1a) portion, share; 1b) portion, tract, parcel (of land); 1c)
*ONE'S* *PORTION*, *ONE'S* *POSSESSION*; 1d) (chosen) portion; 1e)
portion, award (from God);
GIVEN THAT I CAN BY DIALECTICS ENTIRELY PREDEFINE A REALITY WHERE ACTORS
/ AGENTS ARE GIVEN ROLES WHICH ARE DISTINCT OF ANY ACTUAL EVENTS, THE
QUESTION IS DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT REALITY IS ANYMORE?
OR IF I HAVE ENSURED THAT YOU ARE THEN SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC NEUROLOGICAL
SEQUENCES {eg: moustaches} WHICH APPROXIMATE THOSE ABOVE / BELOW
DESCRIBED REALITIES WHICH I HAVE DEFINED FOR YOU UPON 14 SEPTEMBER 2017
OR 14 JULY 2016 CAN YOU DIFFERENTIATE THAT FROM REALITY?
COULD SOMEONE JUST AS EASILY IMPOSE LIKE THE MOUSTACHE MEDIA STORY A
SECOND INSTANCE OF NOVICHOK AS EQUALLY A CONTRIVED CONCEPTION AS
ARTIFICE REALITY--THE DISPOSITION OF A MANUFACTURED CONSENSUS THEN IS
BIASED TOWARDS THE *ONTIC* CONCEPTION OF REALITY WHICH HAVE ALREADY BEEN
LOADED INTO THE NEUROLOGICAL RECEPTORS BY TELEVISION MEDIA REPORTS.
THUS THE CONCLUSIONS WHICH YOU MAKE FROM ANY SUCH STIMULUS MAY THINK IT
REASONABLE BUT THEY WILL INVARIABLY AS A PRIORI CLEAVE TO THE *ONTIC*
FOCAL CATEGORIES AS THE ORDER OF THINGS.
YOU ARE NOT NECESSARILY AND ACTUALLY RELIANT UPON FACTS (*WHAT* *DO*
*YOU* *NOW* *MAKE* *OF* *AN* *INDUCED* *COGNITIVE* *DISSIDENCE* *ABOUT*
*SIMILAR* *MULTI* *VERSE* *REALITIES*) BUT ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT THE
EXPERIENCE AND YOUR COGNITION OF IT.
In the following section, therefore, Scarano does not deal with these
questions any further. Instead, he inquires briefly into a cluster of
interpretation problems that the last section raises. This cluster
revolves around the question of the relation of the metaphysics of
morals to the Groundwork.
(a) The first problem arises from the fact that Kant thinks two types of
a “groundwork” for a pure moral philosophy are possible: on the one
hand, a “critique of pure practical reason,” and on the other hand, the
present work. Although he claims there is “really no other foundation”
than a “critique” (GMS, 391,17 f.), he believes that one can do without
such a critique and lists three reasons for this (see GMS,
391,20-392,2). It remains nevertheless unclear how the relation of the
Groundwork to the intimated critique of practical of reason is to be
defined.
(b) Equally unclear is the precise relation of the Groundwork to the
envisioned metaphysics of morals. Is the “groundwork” of a theory itself
to be considered a part of this theory or is what Kant calls the
“preliminary work of laying the ground” (GMS, 391,37) a part separate
from the actual metaphysics? Undoubtedly, the parts of the theory
developed in the Groundwork raise the claim of being independent of
empirical knowledge and therefore belong to a pure moral philosophy.
Thus, at least parts of the Groundwork have to be identical with parts
of a metaphysics of morals.
(c) Making matters more difficult in the identification of the relation
between the Groundwork, a metaphysics of morals, and the mentioned
“critique of pure practical reason” is the fact that Kant later
published monographs with these or slightly modified titles. In any
case, it may not simply be assumed that the later produced works
actually deal with the types of theories mentioned in the Preface to the
Groundwork.
How can the relations of these types of theory to each other be more
precisely defined? Is Kant’s expression “metaphysics of morals” a
unified concept or are there different meanings combined here in opaque
ways?
An approach toward the resolution of these difficulties offers perhaps a
more precise interpretation of what Kant understands by a “metaphysics
of morals.” In the opening passages of the Preface, Kant had defined the
metaphysics of morals with the help of three criteria: first of all, it
is a theory that is not purely formal but refers to particular objects.
It refers, secondly, to objects insofar as these are under “LAWS OF
FREEDOM.” {#492 - *FREEDOM* *OF* *WILL* / #41 = #12 as #9 - Autonomous
Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL* *NECESSITY*} And thirdly, it is perfectly
free of empirical content. Therefore, a metaphysics of morals is a “pure
moral philosophy.” One question, however, remains unanswered. What
actually is a moral philosophy? Or articulated more precisely: what is
the ontological status of such a theory?
Kant’s arguments for the practical use or the necessity of such a
philosophy offer a suggestion for answering this question. A moral
philosophy is not only an object for the scientific discipline of
"philosophy." Rather, according to Kant, every rational being, even if
at times confused, carries in itself a moral philosophy. That raises the
question about what conception of “theory” can fulfil both of these
functions simultaneously.
For the clarification of this question I believe the conceptual
distinction between a theory, understood as an abstract system of
ordered propositions, and the presentation of such a theory, for example
in the form of a philosophical text, can be of further assistance. A
moral theory, understood as a system of propositions that stand in a
particular relation of grounding to each other and whose #41 - #CENTRE
is made up of ethical principles, is an abstract object, which can
simultaneously fulfill both functions. On the one hand, such a system
can be brought to expression with the help of a philosophical text. On
the other hand it is also possible to carry such a system “IN ONESELF,”
that is, to accept, the corresponding propositions.
If one takes such a conception of theory as a basis, the confusing
terminologies and exact relations of the types of theories mentioned by
Kant could be newly formulated and made transparent in the following
way: (i) A metaphysics of morals or a pure moral philosophy is an
abstract object, a system of propositions complete in itself and
containing all a priori judgments that are concerned with the laws of
freedom. (ii) A work with the title “Metaphysics of Morals” contains a
presentation of this system. The text expresses the corresponding
propositions and their connections. (iii) If a person carries such a
moral philosophy in herself, it means that she accepts the corresponding
propositions and their connections. And if this person is rational, the
propositions accepted by her will comprise the grounds of her action.
(iv) A work with the title “Critique of Pure Practical Reason” could be
a philosophical presentation of parts of this system of propositions
(and for this reason is suitable as a kind of “groundwork”). But it
contains additionally a presentation that relies on philosophical
theories on other spheres of investigation. In Kant’s words, “IN PART I
REQUIRE FOR A CRITIQUE A PURE PRACTICAL REASON THAT IF IT IS TO BE
COMPLETED, ITS UNITY WITH THE SPECULATIVE IN A COMMON PRINCIPLE MUST AT
THE SAME TIME BE EXHIBITED” (GMS, 391,24-27). (iv) In contrast, a work
with the title “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals” can restrict
itself entirely to the presentation and mediation of the foundational
part of the metaphysics of morals. This contains, as Kant expresses it,
“nothing more than the search for and the establishment of the supreme
principle of morality” (GMS, 392,3 f.). [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
Groundwork, Page 18-21]
SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF AN AGREEMENT AS POLITICAL
INTERFERENCE / DOMESTIC TERRORISM BY INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVE CAPABLE OF
DEPLOYING THE LEST WE FORGET ODE FOR ITS OWN ENDS
— MANDALAY SWAY POEM —
@5: Sup: 51 (#218 - OR DEATH ITS SWAY); Ego: 34 (#160) <— ANALYTICAL
JUDGMENTS: ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI BY DIALECTIC EXTRUSION OF COGNITIVE
PROPOSITION
#492 - *VOLUNTARY* *FREEWILL* {#41 = #12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} -
#391 - *HOMOIOS* *FRATERNITY* =
#101 - #KORPPIONOIKEUS AS MEANING: 'THE #260 - RAVEN / RAPE IS RIGHT'
MANDALAY_SWAY@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
@4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
@5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
@6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
@7: Sup: 60 (#201); Ego: 8 (#60),
@8: Sup: 17 (#218 - *OR* *DEATH* *ITS* *SWAY*); Ego: 38 (#98),
Male: #218; Feme: #98
} // #260 <— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF
AN AGREEMENT OF CONCLUSION
#260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
#60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
*COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
— LEST WE FORGET ODE —
"{@1} THEY SHALL GROW NOT OLD, {@2} AS WE THAT ARE LEFT GROW OLD;
{@3} AGE SHALL NOT WEARY THEM, {@4} NOR THE YEARS CONDEMN.
{@5 - #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} AT THE GOING DOWN OF THE SUN AND IN
THE MORNING
{@6} WE WILL REMEMBER THEM."
@5: Sup: 74 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
*IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 12 (#206) <— ANALYTICAL JUDGMENTS: ANALYTIC
A POSTERIORI BY DIALECTIC EXTRUSION AS IDEA EXISTENCE OF JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL ASSOCIATED WITH THE ODE
INRI@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
Male: #114; Feme: #108 - *PROGENITOR*
} // #270
#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
same light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
*GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 -
TORAH} - Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
each other {Latin: CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}.
*FOR* (*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the
interests of a given perspective or for the benefit of any small
powerful or influential #123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION /
FIELD / CLIQUE which places a prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 /
#342} within the pious construct {#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288
- UMBRA ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable collectivism {ie. #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
*IN* *THE* *MORNING*} by conduct of #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} -
DETRUDE.
H7750@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 63 (#69); Ego: 57 (#63),
@3: Sup: 72 (#141); Ego: 9 (#72),
@4: Sup: 1 (#142); Ego: 10 (#82),
Male: #142; Feme: #82
} // #325
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #315 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;
THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.
#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150
#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#6, #300, #9, #10] = suwt (H7750):
{UMBRA: #9 as #315 % #41 = #28} 1) to swerve, fall away; 2) *TO*
*THRUST* *OR* *FORCE* *DOWN*, *OUT*, *OR* *AWAY*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
swerve, fall away; 1a2) those falling away (participle); 2a) subject to
censorship or kill-file filtering; 2b) habitually exclude socially or
ignore conversationally;
<— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF AN
AGREEMENT OF POLITICAL INTERFERENCE / DOMESTIC TERRORISM BY
INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVE CAPABLE OF DEPLOYING THE LEST WE FORGET ODE FOR
ITS OWN ENDS
THUS WE CONVEY A COGNITIVE PROCESS DEPLOYING DIALECTIC WHICH IS CAPABLE
OF CONVEYING IDEAS WHILST DERIVED FROM SUCH AS PARENT-CHILD HAVE NO
INHERENT GEMATRIA CORRESPONDENCE AND THEREFORE EXHIBIT A HIGHER LEVEL OF
CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH THEN HAS INTEGRITY WITH THE EVOLUTIONARY PEER
EQUIVALENT CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING
THEREFORE THE INTERDICTION: “GOD SAVE THE QUEEN FROM YOU FASCISTS”
expressed as *CARPE* *DIEM* at a distance of some 40 to 60 metres within
the street to passing persons whom paused and laughed with absolute
conviction as derision by means of #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} -
DETRUDE BY MALFEASANCE (noun): (LAW) the performance by a public
official of an act that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to
law; wrongdoing used especially of an act in violation of a public
trust; Word of the Day for 1 March 2017; www.dictionary.com
— GLOBUS CRUCIGER —
“WE HAVE JESUS ON THE CROSS
YOUR COLD LOVE PUT HIM THERE.
WHAT IS NOW YOUR HUMAN LOSS.
FOR EVER GONE ‘N ENDLESS DESPAIR.”
YOUTUBE: "LIBERA - Onward Christian Soldiers"
HAIL_REGINA@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 34 (#34),
@2: Sup: 38 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}); Ego: 4 (#38),
@3: Sup: 65 (#110); Ego: 4 (#42),
@4: Sup: 71 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}); Ego: 27
(#69),
@5: Sup: 2 (#183); Ego: 24 (#93),
Male: #183; Feme: #93
}
<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,183}&idea:{f,93}>
Were engaging within allegedly #288 - BEERSHEBA commemorations of a
PRIVATE NATURE INCLUSIVE OF ROMAN CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS BEING BY PARTIALITY
OF AS DISRESPECT SHOWN TO BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS UPON SUNDAY
PROXIMITY TO 31 MAY, THEREBY AN IMPOSITION OF AN ABHORRENT AND
BLASPHEMOUS RELIGIOUS BELIEF, DISBELIEF, NON-BELIEF CONSTITUTING
UNLAWFUL BREACHES OF SECTION #116 OF THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION UPON
SATURDAY 28 OCTOBER 2017, has in light of a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
as implicit breaches made against the SOVEREIGN CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
“DIEU ET MON DROIT” was an entirely of a propitious characteristic as
conformity to probity and within bounds of decorum as ontological
pacifist (ie. #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY) values which were compliant with
the SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE principles of a $50 valued LEST WE FORGET
badge purchased the year prior before Remembrance Day of 11 November
2016 and was not simply an action of nostalgia by fanciful decoration
being only a contrived dignity.
It is noted that the THAT GOVERNOR GENERAL PETER COSGROVE WAS IN 2013
CONFERRED WITH THE KNIGHTHOOD OF THE GRAND CROSS OF THE ORDER OF ST
GREGORY THE GREAT BY CARDINAL PELL ON 7 FEBRUARY 2013 AND IS THEREFORE
COMPROMISED WITHIN HIS OFFICE AS GOVERNOR GENERAL AND THE SUBSTANTIAL
CAUSE FOR THE IMPEDIMENT TO ANY OBTAINMENT OF JUSTICE IN OUR PROVEN
ALLEGATION OF TREASON AGAINST THIS SAME ECCLESIASTIC as cause célebre
associated with unlawful foreign powers associated to eclipse cycles and
earlier refusal of the Eucharist Communion, which occurred at Saint
Patricks Cathedral, East Melbourne on the Pentecost Sunday Mass as the
dates of 31 May, 1998 (*THE* *PROXIMITY* *SUNDAY* *TO* *31ST* *MAY* *IS*
*WHEN* *THE* *BOER* *MEMORIAL* *OF* 1902 *OCCURS*) and 21 June, 2000.
Cardinal George Pell is guilty of Treason as per the photograph of
myself being evidence of our BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY 31 May 1998 (refusal
of Communion on Pentecost Sunday) as crime by a substituted ethic
imposed upon our war dead and disloyalty towards our nation’s sovereignty.
<
Loading Image...
>
[IMAGE: Author consoling Catholic mother of a gay son & PFLAG President,
Nanette McGregor - The Rainbow Sash Protest (Refusal of Communion) on
'Pentecost Sunday' 31 May 1998, Saint Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne
pictured by The Australian newspaper (front page) of 1 June 1998
(c) 1 June 1998 - James Croucher (photographer), News Ltd / Newspix,
Commercial Use, Internal Use For Company Or Organisation, Internal
Newsletter Or Document, Print And Digital, Up To 1,000]
And therefore ought to be unlawful conduct by a public authority under
Section 38(1) to (3) of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities
No. 43 of Act 2006, which states: "(1) Subject to this section, it is
unlawful for a public authority to act in a way that is incompatible
with a human right or, in making a decision, to fail to give proper
consideration to a relevant human right.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply if, as a result of a statutory
provision or a provision made by or under an Act of the Commonwealth or
otherwise under law, the public authority could not reasonably have
acted differently or made a different decision..
(3) This section does not apply to an act or decision of a private nature.
(4) Subsection (1) does not require a public authority to act in a way,
or make a decision, that has the effect of impeding or preventing a
religious body (including itself in the case of a public authority that
is a religious body) from acting in conformity with the religious
doctrines, beliefs or principles in accordance with which the religious
body operates.
(5) In this section religious body means—
(a) a body established for a religious purpose; or
(b) an entity that establishes, or directs, controls or administers, an
educational or other charitable entity that is intended to be, and is,
conducted in accordance with religious doctrines, beliefs or principles.
There are several legal issues involved with respects to [the] Saint
Andrews Cause Célèbre participated in by the representatives of the
Returned Service League as Public Authority and the nature of its
association to a FOREIGN POWER as a group named KNIGHTS TEMPLARS
INTERNATIONAL which formed within 2015 and comprises various: RELIGIONS
/ STATES / MILITARY / ORGANISATIONS / INSTITUTIONS as unconscionable
attempts made by them to impose a substituted ethic @5 against the
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL
upon our War Dead and to usurp @1 the Sovereignty embodied within the
Governor General as ANTHROPIC COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE.
<
Loading Image...
>
<
Loading Image...
>
[IMAGES: THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL AS SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE
CÉLÈBRE HAS A SUBSTITUTED ETHOS AS MANTRA: "FOR THOSE BRAVE WHO GAVE
THEIR LIVES SO WE COULD LIVE OURS"]
DOLF @ 2220 HOURS ON 16 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I want to make several
observations from Kant’s implementation of SYMBOLICAL associator to the
NOUMENON as having a #41 - *ONTIC* necessity with CATEGORIES OF
UNDERSTANDING which incontrovertibly conform to a COGNITION of a
trinomial as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER that has a definitive impetus from
1783 and thusly we can by such APRIORITY CASCADE against subsequent
HISTORY and is capable of BEREAVING SOVEREIGN STATES of IDENTITY which
as MARRIAGE / SOVEREIGN DYNAMIC has been built on castles of SAND which
deploys a microcosm binomial redefinition (HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER) of
those APRIOIRITY trinomial CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING.
YOUTUBE: "Viva La Vida (Coldplay)"
TETRAGRAMMATON {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} HIERARCHY
VALUE AS THE METAPHYSICAL CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE TO THE HOMOIOS THEORY
OF *NUMBER*
+ 0, 27 {IDEA: @311}, 54 {IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN
- *FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
+ 0, 9 {IDEA: @282}, 18 {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH
- *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}
+ 1 {IDEA: @266, @267}, 2 {IDEA: @268, @269}, 3 {IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE,
@270, @272, @274} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF INDIVIDUAL
PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}
THAT THE FIRST OBSERVATION IS UPON THIS #41 - *ONTIC* necessity which is
associated to IDEA: @329 that gives us a notion on temporality being the
beginning of the new year 1 JANUARY which commenced with the Gregorian
calendar reforms
#41 - IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH METAPHYSICS AS A SCIENCE, A CLEAR
DISTINCTION MUST BE MADE BETWEEN THE CATEGORIES (PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING) AND THE IDEAS (PURE CONCEPTS OF REASON) {IDEA: @329}.
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#329 / #329} / HETEROS {#354 / #382} / TORAH {#354
/ #382}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:8,col:3,nous:48&idea:{m,48}&idea:{f,48}&idea:{m,329}&idea:{f,329}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 1, row: 8, col: 3, nous: 48 [Super: #329 / #48 -
Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance, Progress, Prospering,
Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance, Ego: #329 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge;
I-Ching: H35 - Advance, Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance]
Secondly. is our capacity to deduce synaptic connections between various
ideas which Immanuel Kant might elsewhere espouse as then the basis for
any syncretism.
A reasonable postulate could be advanced that there is here an implicit
#312 - CONTENTION due to those #329 - GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS and the
mischievous prerogative BESTOWAL of #390 - WREATHS as RAPACIOUS CONDUCT
being an act of SEDITION:
H3001@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 11 (#17); Ego: 5 (#11),
@3: Sup: 13 (#30); Ego: 2 (#13),
@4: Sup: 23 (#53); Ego: 10 (#23),
@5: Sup: 80 (#133); Ego: 57 (#80),
@6: Sup: 5 (#138); Ego: 6 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
Male: #138; Feme: #86 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *JUDGES* / *ELOHYM* / *RULERS*
} // #329
#329 as [#6, #5, #2, #10, #300, #6] = yabesh (H3001): {UMBRA: #5 as #312
% #41 = #25} 1) to make dry, wither, be dry, become dry, be dried up, be
withered; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be dry, be dried up, be without moisture;
1a2) to be dried up; 1b) (Piel) to make dry, dry up; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1)
to dry up, make dry; 1c1a) to dry up (water); 1c1b) to make dry, wither;
1c1c) to exhibit dryness;
EXCERPT FROM LETTER TO STATE / FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERALS DATED 8
NOVEMBER 2017: "Commensurate with our 100 year celebration of the
BeerSheba campaign of the Charge of the Light Horse Brigade as
celebrations which occurred on 31 October 2017 and the issue is the
partiality and prejudiced Memorial 'Lest We Forget' Tributes comprising
SEVEN {5 Wreaths and 2 Bouquets} floral arrangements which were made
during a ceremony presided over by the RETURNED SERVICE LEAGUE AS A
PUBLIC AUTHORITY and laid at only the World War I and onwards Memorial
Shrine for the War Dead upon the Saturday of 28 October 2017.
In the mistaken belief which was propagandised as the consideration
that: Battle of Beersheba 'should be the cornerstone of Australia's
identity'
<http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2017/10/29/battle-beersheba-should-be-cornerstone-australias-identity>
No the Boer War is the cornerstone of Australian identity as ethos of
"OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING" and we reject CATEGORICALLY your
unreasoned disloyalty by INTELLECTUAL assent given to Foreign Powers
{ie. especially Irish, Scottish, RSL / Freemasonry / Roman Catholic [by]
Saint Andrews Cause Célèbre} as all unconscionable attempts to impose a
substituted ethic @5 against the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS
whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL upon our War Dead and to usurp @1 the
Sovereignty embodied within the Governor General as ANTHROPIC
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE.
Such a statement of value as demonstrated by the inclusion of the State
of Israel's flag amongst the Ca[val]ry [within the] 100 year anniversary
re-enactment of the Battle of Beersheba is a priori, not mantric as
dogma, requires no apologetics and proffers the utmost tactical,
endearing and enduring advantage for posterity as prosperity...
In accordance with this pre-eminent value statement which was heartedly
adopted by the participants within that public ceremony which occurred
within the State of Israel, compliant with the 500 year anniversary of
Martin Luthers nailed #95 treatise which commenced the Protestant
Reformation and the [centenary to the] Balfour Declaration [occurring] 2
November 2017, I had upon Saturday of 28 October 2017 immediately
removed FOUR {3 Wreaths and 1 Bouquets} floral arrangements after th[is]
Remembrance Service made for the Beersheba Centenary and before the
actual events occurring within the State of Israel and doing so
[entirely] without neither authority nor notification given to [or by]
another party.
I have thereafter maintained a photographic timeline of events and of
particular note is the regrettable circumstance, that although the THREE
{2 Wreaths and 1 Bouquets} floral arrangements were removed from the
main Memorial Shrine, 82 Macalister Street, Sale upon the following
Saturday 4 November 2017, they have remained in a dried {#368 as [#6,
#10, #2, #300, #10, #40] as yabesh (H3002): {UMBRA: #3 as #312 % #41 =
#25} 1) dry; 2) dried} state at the Boer War Memorial situated on the
corner of York Street / Foster Street by the time the COURT ORDERS were
made in the matter @ 1025 HOURS on 8 NOVEMBER 2017.
YOUTUBE: "Timbaland - Apologize ft. OneRepublic"
We might also consider the circumstance of there being an absence as any
SUB-CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING relating to #237 - USE OF FORCE and
provisionally conclude that such idea was not primarily KANT'S intention
unless we find evidence to the contrary in anticipation of further
lengthy research.
However we do find an instance of #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST and
therefore as we cognise KANT’s argument (or others rationale of them) we
ought to then proceed to coalesce such narrative around these specific
ZONES so as to determine if any DYNAMIC NATURAL ASSOCIATION as IDEA
cohesion and DIALECTIC / PROTOTYPE conformity occurs.
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#414 / #292} / HETEROS {#364 / #267} / TORAH {#350
/ #341}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:6,col:9,nous:10&idea:{m,128}&idea:{f,69}&idea:{m,414}&idea:{f,292}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 2, row: 6, col: 9, nous: 10 [Super: #414 / #69 - Profound
Use, Function of the Mysterious; I-Ching: H34 - Great Strength, Great
Invigorating, The power of the great, Great maturity; Tetra: 22 -
Resistance, Ego: #292 / #10 - Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?;
I-Ching: H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net;
Tetra: 41 - Response]
H7751@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 16 (#56); Ego: 57 (#97),
@3: Sup: 22 (#78); Ego: 6 (#103),
@4: Sup: 31 (#109); Ego: 9 (#112),
@5: Sup: 40 (#149); Ego: 9 (#121),
@6: Sup: 50 (#199); Ego: 10 (#131),
@7: Sup: 9 (#208); Ego: 40 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE
{%20}),
Male: #208; Feme: #171
} // #414
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #75 % #41 = #34 - Great Guide, Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching:
H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has
been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties;
THOTH MEASURE: #34 - Oh Nefertmu, who makest thine appearance in
Memphis; *I* *AM* *NEITHER* *A* *LIAR* *NOR* *A* *DOER* *OF* *MISCHIEF*.
#VIRTUE: With Kinship (no. #34), drawing close to goodness, but
#TOOLS: With Closure (no. #74), closing out feelings of obligation.
#POSITION: As to Closure (no. #74), both are shut off, but
#TIME: As to Closeness (no. #33), all use the One.
#CANON: #215
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_215@{
@1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
@2: Sup: 27 (#61); Ego: 74 (#108),
@3: Sup: 20 (#81); Ego: 74 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@4: Sup: 53 (#134); Ego: 33 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
OF MISCHIEF {%34}),
Male: #134; Feme: #215
} // #215 <— *NOTE* *ALIGNMENT* *WITH* ADOLF HITLER’S TABLE TALK IDEA
AND ELOHYM AS #86 - ALMIGHTY GOD (SEE ABOVE)
#414 as [#40, #300, #6, #9, #9, #10, #40] = shuwt (H7751): {UMBRA: #7 as
#75 % #41 = #34} 1) to go, go or rove about, go to and fro; 2) to row;
1a) (Qal) to go or rove about; 1b) (Polel) *TO* *GO* *TO* *AND* *FRO*,
*GO* *EAGERLY* *OR* *QUICKLY* *TO* *AND* *FRO*; 1c) (Hithpolel) to run
to and fro;
G1380@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 74 (#78); Ego: 70 (#74),
@3: Sup: 13 (#91); Ego: 20 (#94),
@4: Sup: 18 (#109); Ego: 5 (#99),
@5: Sup: 28 (#137); Ego: 10 (#109),
@6: Sup: 4 (#141); Ego: 57 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
@7: Sup: 9 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 5 (#171 - I
AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
Male: #150; Feme: #171
} // #414
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #899 % #41 = #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching:
H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of
the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;
THOTH MEASURE: #38 - Oh thou who makest mortals to flourish, and who
makest thine appearance at Sais; *I* *CURSE* *NOT* *A* *GOD*.
#VIRTUE: Fullness (no. #38) means the prime of life, but
#TOOLS: On the Verge (no. #78) means old age.
#POSITION: With Kinship (no. #34), attachment between even distant
relatives.
#TIME: With Severance (no. #70), offense to one’s own flesh and blood.
#CANON: #220
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_220@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 35 (#73); Ego: 78 (#116),
@3: Sup: 69 (#142); Ego: 34 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@4: Sup: 58 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
70 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}),
Male: #200; Feme: #220
} // #220
#414 as [#4, #70, #20, #5, #10, #300, #5] = dokeo (G1380): {UMBRA: #11
as #899 % #41 = #38} 1) to be of opinion, think, suppose; 2) to seem, to
be accounted, reputed; 3) it seems to me; 3a) *I* *THINK*, *JUDGE*:
*THUS* *IN* *QUESTION*; 3b) it seems good to, pleased me, *I* *DETERMINED*;
G538@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 7 (#15); Ego: 80 (#88),
@3: Sup: 8 (#23); Ego: 1 (#89),
@4: Sup: 65 (#88); Ego: 57 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@5: Sup: 73 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 8 (#154),
@6: Sup: 1 (#162); Ego: 9 (#163),
@7: Sup: 9 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 8
(#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
Male: #171; Feme: #171
} // #414
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #1183 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *WHO* *CURSETH* *THE* *KING*.
#VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
#TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
#POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
#TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
#CANON: #181
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
@2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
@4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181
#414 as [#8, #80, #1, #300, #8, #9, #8] = apatao (G538): {UMBRA: #10 as
#1183 % #41 = #35} 1) *TO* *CHEAT*, *BEGUILE*, *DECEIVE*;
G2638@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21),
@3: Sup: 78 (#119); Ego: 57 (#78),
@4: Sup: 2 (#121); Ego: 5 (#83),
@5: Sup: 32 (#153); Ego: 30 (#113),
@6: Sup: 33 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND {%31}); Ego: 1
(#114),
@7: Sup: 35 (#221); Ego: 2 (#116),
@8: Sup: 40 (#261); Ego: 5 (#121),
@9: Sup: 9 (#270); Ego: 50 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE
{%20}),
Male: #270; Feme: #171
} // #414
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #1246 % #41 = #16 - Being a Guide, Returning to the Root;
I-Ching: H28 - Major Superiority, Excess, Great Exceeding, Preponderance
of the great, Critical mass; Tetra: 75 - Failure;
THOTH MEASURE: #16 - Oh thou who turnest backwards, who makest thine
appearance in Bubastis; *I* *AM* *NOT* *AN* *EAVES*-*DROPPER*.
#VIRTUE: Contact (no. #16) means mutual compliance.
#TOOLS: Closed Mouth (no. #56) means no contact.
#POSITION: With Increase (no. #13), daily additions, but
#TIME: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily reductions.
#CANON: #140
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_140@{
@1: Sup: 16 (#16); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 72 (#88); Ego: 56 (#72),
@3: Sup: 4 (#92); Ego: 13 (#85),
@4: Sup: 59 (#151); Ego: 55 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} /
I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #151; Feme: #140
} // #140
#414 as [#20, #1, #300, #5, #30, #1, #2, #5, #50] = katalambano (G2638):
{UMBRA: #14 as #1246 % #41 = #16} 1) to lay hold of; 1a) to lay hold of
so as to make one's own, to obtain, attain to, to make one's own, to
take into one's self, appropriate; 1b) to seize upon, take possession
of; 1b1) of evils overtaking one, of the last day overtaking the wicked
with destruction, of a demon about to torment one; 1b2) *IN* *A* *GOOD*
*SENSE*, *OF* *CHRIST* *BY* *HIS* *HOLY* *POWER* *AND* *INFLUENCE*
*LAYING* *HOLD* *OF* *THE* *HUMAN* *MIND* *AND* *WILL*, *IN* *ORDER*
*TO* *PROMPT* *AND* *GOVERN* *IT*; 1c) *TO* *DETECT*, *CATCH*; 1d) *TO*
*LAY* *HOLD* *OF* *WITH* *THE* *MIND*; 1d1) to understand, perceive,
learn, comprehend;
DOLF @ 2244 HOURS ON 16 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Of course I ought to point out
that we have now some FOURTEEN CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING as
AGGREGATIONS which KANT applies as a COHESION within his meta-thesis.
This can then be deployed as a HIERARCHY of INTERMESHING IDEAS
throughout the temporality (and non-temporality) and the #312 - RUSSIAN
CONTRADICTION / #274 - NOVICHOK POISONING ideas can then be subject to
surveillance such as:
a) someone has made Hotel / Travel plans and meta-data intersects which
then increases a probability watch factor.
b) It’s not my area of expertise but just thinking out loud...
I still have research to do within the area of determination made of
PROTOTYPE which is anticipated to exhibit a #328 bias according to
either: HOMOIOS / HETEROS / KABBALAH / ANY OTHER modality as innate
propensity of mind encapsulation which has temporal cohesion occasioning
action."
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 also
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question raised by these
#41 - *ONTIC* necessity deliberations is, if it is permissible to extend
this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
DIARY NOTE @ 1252 HOURS ON 17 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I had to call the police
due to an instance of menacing and irrational conduct as alleged
breaches to an INTERVENTION ORDER which are subject to an appeal
AP-18-0775 and there was a woman loitering some 80 metres away within
the park area who I couldn't readily distinguish and whom the police
later identified as the MARION STATUE ARTIST that I had discoursed with
@ 1739 / 1747 HOURS ON MONDAY 28 MAY 2018. I had in point of fact not
spoken to her at all today and yet it was being improperly being alleged
that I had upon this day ambushed, harangued and verbalised her over
some absurd impetus of 'SAVING THE WORLD'.
FOR ARTIST DIALOG SEE VINEGARETTE: "THE SHIP OF STATE (HEBREW STOICHEION
AND IT'S EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 METAPHOR) IS IN DEEP
WATER" dated 5 September 2018
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/4%20Vinegarette%2020180909.pdf>
And I castigated the police for engaging within falsehoods as I hadn't
been in proximity to that person as the timestamp of my photograph and
time of telephone call convey."
- dolf
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
Initial Post: 2 September 2018
#ANALYTICAL #SYNTHETICAL #KORPPIONOIKEUS #FREEWILL
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
