Post by g***@gmail.comPost by Zelos MalumPost by Eram semper rectaPost by Zelos MalumPost by Eram semper rectaPost by Zelos MalumPost by Eram semper rectaPost by SergioPost by Erasmo ScobeePost by Eram semper rectaPost by JanIt's all very strange, people insisting on doing precisely the things
they have no talent for. All that results is nonsense and frustration,
nothing to do with reality and truth. It's all just one big stifling
fog. -- Jan
Stupid fuck. When you don't know any mathematics, you should do the
right thing and shut the fuck up you incorrigible MORON.
I can't see the tensor equation, you two guys are debating the solution
of. Without rigorous PDE and tensorial description of the model/problem,
I can't state anything. Try again.
no tensors at all, need to step *way down to high school math*.
JG can't figure out the slope of a line, let him show you how his math
works on y = tan(x) + Ln(x) + e^(-x)
Trump moron eh?
notice how you never take anyone up on the challenge on showing your thing on more complicated functions?
Because it has been done many times, you dishonest piece of filth.
It hasn't, you avoid it because you know you can't.
Talking about your inability to provide any counter-example eh?
show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the derivative of f(x)=ln x.
Not until you admit you are wrong.
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.
I have shown you many examples, but you are a dishonest, stubborn little
swine.
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.
Post by g***@gmail.comIf you were in my class, I would throw you out as toxic material.
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.
Post by g***@gmail.comMy theorem is 100% correct.
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.
Post by g***@gmail.comThe beauty about GEOMETRY is that you can't debate it as you do the bullshit of set theory and propositional logic.
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.
Post by g***@gmail.comIt is either correct or it is not.
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.
Post by g***@gmail.comThere are NO rules or beliefs (axioms) in sound mathematics which is based on FACT.
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.
Post by g***@gmail.comDo you even realise that you are harming thousands of your countrymen who couldn't put up with the bullshit you had to memorise in college?
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.
Post by g***@gmail.comStop thinking about yourself for once and think about others.
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.
Post by g***@gmail.comWhy should they have to endure the same bullshit you did?
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.
Post by g***@gmail.comBy supporting the orangutans who brainwashed you, you are simply continuing the cycle of intellectual abuse and destroying thousands of lives in the process.
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.
Post by g***@gmail.comStudents are not as stupid as you think!
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.
Post by g***@gmail.comEven those who are uneducated can sense bullshit from a great distance.
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.
Post by g***@gmail.com99% of your ideas and the way you think, is just drivel.
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.
Post by g***@gmail.comYou have a very superficial understanding which is equivalent to NO understanding.
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.
Post by g***@gmail.comMathematics is about measure and number.
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.
Post by g***@gmail.comAnything else is NOT mathematics.
JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the
derivative of f(x)=ln(x).
Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,
unworkable, discard it totally.
SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)
and show all the steps.