Post by The PeelerOn Wed, 12 Jun 2019 04:16:17 -0700, clinically insane, serbian bitch
Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual
cripple, making an ass of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)Post by Michael EjercitoPost by The JewsHe knows that. He would have gotten a "blue discharge" after the
second or third day, while brave Jews went off to defeat the Third
Reich.
Indeed.
Inane. Typical mindless Oriental 'me too'.
There's NOTHING inane about agreeing with the truth, you housebound
bigmouthed COWARD!
Yup.
Post by The PeelerNow, THAT is the epitome of inanity! <tsk>
Your master Michael doesn't come across like that AT ALL! But YOU indeed DO
come across as a limpwristed mangina!
Indeed.
Now here is Jack Marshall writing about the big lies of the Resistance®™.
https://ethicsalarms.com/2019/06/10/the-big-lies-of-the-resistance-a-directory-big-lie-1-trump-is-just-a-reality-tv-star/
The Big Lies Of The “Resistance”: A Directory. Big Lie #1: Trump Is Just A
Reality TV Star
JUNE 10, 2019 / JACK MARSHALL
Introduction
The “Big Lie” strategy of public opinion manipulation, most infamously
championed by Adolf Hitler and his propaganda master Joseph Goebbels, has,
in sinister fashion, become a routine and ubiquitous component of the Left’s
efforts to remove President Donald J. Trump from office without having to
defeat him at the polls. One of the most publicized Big Lies, that the
President had “colluded” with the Russian government to “steal” the
Presidential election from Hillary Clinton was recently exposed as such by
the results of the Mueller investigation, and Democrats, with blazing speed,
replaced it with another Big Lie that there is a “Constitutional crisis.”
Becoming addicted to relying on Big Lies as a political strategy is not the
sign of ethical political parties, movements, or ideologies.
Perhaps there is a useful distinction between Big Lies and “false
narratives,” but I can’t define one. Both are intentional falsehoods
designed to frame events in a confounding and deceptive manner, so public
policy debates either begin with them as assumptions, thus warping the
discussion, or they result in permanent bias, distrust and suspicion of the
lie/narrative’s target. For simplicity’s sake, because I believe it is fair
to do so, and also because “Big Lie” more accurately reflects just how
unethical the tactic is, that is the term I will use in this and the posts
to come
Big Lie #1. “Trump is just a reality TV star.”
This one began at the very start of Trump’s candidacy. It’s pure deceit:
technically accurate in part but completely misleading. Ronald Reagan was
subjected to a similar Big Lie when Democrats routinely referred to him as
just an actor, conveniently ignoring the fact that he had served as Governor
of the largest state in the nation for eight years, and had split his time
between acting and politics for many years before that, gradually becoming
more involved in politics and public policy. (Reagan once expressed faux
puzzlement about the denigration of his acting background, saying that he
thought acting was an invaluable skill in politics. He was right, of
course.)
In Trump’s case, the disinformation was even more misleading: he was a
successful international businessman and entrepreneur in real estate, hotels
and casinos, and it was that experience, not his successful, late career
foray into “The Apprentice” (as a branding exercise, and a brilliant one),
that was the basis of his claim to the Presidency.
The “reality star” smear appeared in several articles I read just last week,
and I read far from everything. The tactic is indefensible ethically. It is
not only dishonest, intentionally distorting the President’s legitimate
executive experience and success, expertise and credentials, it is also an
ad hominem attack. Reality shows are primarily modern freak shows allowing
viewers to look down on assorted lower class drunks, vulgarians,has-been,
exhibitionists, idiots and freaks. Class bigotry has always been a core
part of the NeverTrump cabal, with Ivy League snobs like Bill Kristol, the
Bushes, and George Will revealing that they would rather capitulate to the
Leftist ideology they have spent their professional lives opposing than
stoop to being on the same team as a common barbarian like Trump.
With all of this, the final irony is that “The Apprentice” wasn’t even a
true reality show. It was an elimination contest, with Donald Trump as the
arbiter.
The earliest of the Big Lies backfired on its creators. Trump’s opposition
began to believe it themselves,causing them to under-estimate their
adversary. They realized, too late, that they weren’t running against poor
Anna Nicole Smith, Kim Kardashian, or Scott Baio, but a tough, ruthless,
confident street fighter with some impressive leadership and public speaking
skills.
It is a mark of how flat the learning curve of the President’s adversaries
is that they still think calling him a “reality TV star” shows anything but
their own dishonesty and ignorance.
https://ethicsalarms.com/2019/06/11/the-big-lies-of-the-resistance-a-directory-big-lie-2-trump-is-not-a-legitimate-president/#more-50934
The Big Lies Of The “Resistance”: A Directory. Big Lie #2: “Trump Is Not A
Legitimate President”
JUNE 11, 2019 / JACK MARSHALL
The Directory of the Big Lies cynically and unethically employed by the
President’s political opponents continues with…
Big Lie #2. “Trump is not a legitimate President”
Although this was not the first of the Big Lies, it was the foundation of
all the others to come. The assertion, seeded by Hillary Clinton and spread
by pundits and the news media, is pure poison to the democracy, national
unity, the public trust, and the national welfare.
It boggles the mind that progressives and Democrats have been willing to
risk so much harm to the United States and its culture for the sole purpose
of waging political warfare against the President of the United States. I
have to believe that at other times in our history, any party considering
such a strategy would be stopped short by a respected and responsible
leader. Incredibly, the Democrats didn’t have one (and still don’t). The
obvious individual who could have minimized the political and cultural
carnage was Barack Obama. He had neither the courage, the character nor the
bi-partisan concern for the nation to do so. This was one more failure of
leadership for the most wildly over-praised President in U.S. history.
The most damning aspect of the Democrats’ refusal after the election to
follow the tradition of all previous losing parties is that they had
lectured Donald Trump, when they were certain of victory, about how he was
obligated to accept the will of the voters.
Hillary Clinton, another leader of the party who could have killed this
insidious tactic in its cradle, was very clear on how essential such
acceptance was—when she thought Trump would be the loser:
“To say you won’t respect the results of the election, that is a direct
threat to our democracy,” she said at a rally at a late October rally the
University of North Carolina. “We’ve been around 240 years. We’ve had free
and fair elections and we’ve accepted the outcomes when we may not have
liked them and that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a debate
stage during a general election.” Later, she said unequivocally that “The
peaceful transfer of power is one of the things that makes America America.”
For once, Hillary was right. Unable to accept her own responsibility for her
shocking defeat, however, she engaged in the exact conduct that she
had—correctly—condemned as dangerous, and allowed (and I assume encouraged)
her party to employ it—to this day—as its signature Big Lie.
The claim that an elected President is “illegitimate” is technically
sedition: it is an invitation and incitement to insurrection. The violent
antifa riots around the Capital during the inauguration were the predictable
result of the accusation, which had and has literally, beyond question, not
an atom, not an electron of evidence to support it, only unhinged, unjust,
hyperbolic contrivances. They begin with the fact that Trump lost the
popular vote, just like four previous Presidents did, in a system that is
enshrined in the Constitution and that every citizen, politician and elected
official accepts as a condition of being an American, being suddenly
pronounced as unacceptable.
Rep. John Lewis, whose position for two decades has been that no
Republican President is legitimate, since he boycotted both the
inauguration of George W. Bush and Trump, went a long way toward spreading
Big Lie #2 by saying on NBC that he did not see Trump as a legitimate
President because “Russian interference” resulted in the revelation of DNC
documents and may have altered the election results. No evidence had
surfaced or has ever surfaced that the Russian shenanigans changed
sufficient numbers of votes or any votes at all to effect the results of the
2016 election.
We now know that the Obama Administration let the Russian efforts go on
unimpeded—it takes a twisted path to reach the argument that Trump is an
illegitimate President because the previous President from the adversary
party neglected his duties. Most troubling of all, to me, at least, is that
in the case of the hacked documents, Americans learned quite a bit about how
corrupt Clinton and her campaign, as well as the DNC , were, and it was
information they had a right to know. If an American had hacked the exact
same documents and the media revealed them, as of course they would, the
claim that any influence on the election was unfair would have been regarded
as laughable. If Hillary Clinton has been elected without the public knowing
about the Clinton Foundation’s corrupt maneuvers, the campaign using a CNN
contributor to cheat in debates and town meetings, and the sinister sabotage
of Bernie Sanders’ campaign for the nomination, there would have been a much
stronger argument that she was “an illegitimate President’ than any of the
claims made about Donald Trump.
The “Illegitimate President” trope seeded all of the “not my President ”
demonstrations with a rationalization, though a false one, and justified,
also falsely, the effort to try to hijack the Electoral College, argument
that the President should be impeached before he was even inaugurated, and
the organized attempts to sabotage the Presidents’ inauguration,
traditionally a unifying and healing event. I blame Lewis for the latter,
as well as Trump’s foolish and typical insults leveled against “the civil
rights icon” which gave members of the Congressional Black Caucus what they
needed to let them join the boycott.
After that, the “illegitimate” slur gave Democrats, “the resistance” and the
media, as well as many unethical professional groups a catalyst to activate
various plots to remove him without risking the uncertainty of another
election.
I tried to find any serious effort to assemble real evidence for the
“illegitimate” claim. As is typical when using Big Lies, most screeds
asserting this one just restated the lie. That’s enough to accomplish
Goebbels’ goal: make the target and his supporters deny the lie, making it a
controversy and keeping the lie before the public. Thank heaven for Old Big
Mouth himself, Michael Moore. In January, before the Inauguration, he listed
on Facebook his six reasons why Trump was “not a legitimate President.”
He had nothing. Here are the six:
The Electoral College shouldn’t count. But it does, and that’s the law, you
hack.
Trump “isn’t well.” That’s funny; I don’t think Moore is well. This is, of
course, just a proto- Plan E , later resurfacing as the 25th Amendment plot,
aided by unprofessional psychiatrists who purported to diagnose someone they
had neither examined nor even met. Not only is the claim unsubstantiated,
it’s irrelevant. Being “not well” wouldn’t make Trump’s Presidency
illegitimate. If the public knowingly elected a certified lunatic as
President, the election would still be legitimate. No one can claim the
electorate didn’t know Trump’s personality, character and eccentricities by
the time they went to the polls.
The Russian interference. Moore, hilariously, said this unmeasurable factor
requires a do-over.
The FBI chose sides, Moore says. This one is especially funny in retrospect.
For #5, Moore just splashed around like a wounded cod. The President is
illegitimate because he appointed someone Michael Moore doesn’t like (Ex-SOS
Rex Tillerson) as Secretary of State. This “reason” actually exposes what
the whole Big Lie is about in its entirety. Trump is “illegitimate” because
progressives don’t like him or what he wants to do. This clip has never been
more appropriate:
6. is ridiculous, and yet it is something we still hear from our “unwell”
friends and relatives. “Trump has potentially committed a number of
felonies,” The statement isn’t law, it isn’t reason, it’s just “I think he’s
a bad guy, and I just know I’m right.”
Big Lie #2 is infantile, and constructed of nothing of substance, just bias
and free-floating anger. Yet, as I wrote at the beginning, it, and the false
assertions within it, form the foundation of all the Big Lies to come.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com