Post by Mike_DuffyPost by BassosHow much have you investigated magick ?
A bit. I do sometimes follow links & read a bit.
Post by BassosDid you peruse liber al ? (do you understand what liber al means ?)
No & No
You do not know what liber al means, and have not peruse it at the same
time.
Quite a magical feat ;)
Post by Mike_DuffyPost by BassosCrowley quote; in the title; how did that evade your experience ?
Sometimes you trick us, or things you say are 'one off'.
Always, so what ?
Your purpose in posting is for you.
See a trap; jump into the trap, wiggle around, taste its fury,
experience what that is like.
Pretty safe in here atm.
Post by Mike_DuffyPost by BassosIt is not like unto you respond to any thingz i wrote ?
I do sometimes respond, especially to direct queries.
If liber al vel legis is a title of a book.
would the book of the law say anything about that ?
Post by Mike_DuffyPost by BassosDo you just read anything i write,
Usually, this is a very low traffic newsgroup.
But you have not read any Crowley ?
Post by Mike_DuffyPost by Bassosbut selectively choose what to respond to ?
Yes, as I just said above.
Post by BassosTry doing a week of responding to everything.
I do have a lot of outdoor stuff I want to finish this summer.
Claims the wife ? :)
Post by Mike_DuffyPost by Bassos(you are allowed to exclude the 49 gates work, if you are full of fear)
How about if I am full of misunderstanding?
Then do research to alleviate your fullness.
When doing research you will find something confusing.
Ask me questions about those kinds of confusions, coz they demonstrate
you did some work.
Post by Mike_DuffyPost by BassosFor i am divided for love sake; for the chance of union.
? Feel free to drop by; I love visitors. But if you want to talk about your
love life, I would not characterize myself as an expert on human relations.
That is the reason for creation.
Being singular is boring.
Divide, for love sake, for the chance of union of separate parts of the
whole, into newer and never experienced before combinations of possibility.
Experience is the reason for creation.
Post by Mike_DuffyPost by BassosEvery number is infinite, there is no difference.
Now you are speaking gibberish.
God can make a rock so heavy she cannot lift that rock, but he can lift
that rock anyway.
God is not bound by logic.
Both division for love sake, and every number is infinite go together.
There is only 1 number, and that number divided into many numbers.
(number theory :P)
What if yonder beggar is a king ?
Strike hard and low
A king will be unaffected, but a beggar cannot hide their poverty.
(sorta)
Post by Mike_DuffyIt does remind me though,
of the time in my QM classs where the Prof derived Euler's
equation: "exp(ix) = cos(x) + i * sin(x)".
I realized that 'imaginary' numbers are just as real as 'real' ones.
And that 'real' numbers are just as imaginary as 'imaginary' ones.
Sorta kinda.
Mathematics is ... :)
Know your crowley quote; as a hint, that that is a point i make, using a
crowley quote about this subject in particular, in this thread about
crowley quotes, with you, who do not feel which is me, and what is crowleys.
Seems funny on its own.
Imagine how full of joy this can turn into if you also understood these
crowley quotes, and then we just explore together ?
Post by Mike_DuffyPost by Bassos"many people have claimed to be the reincarnation of aleister crowley"
I claim to be Bassos; the King of alt.magick, the worst poster on
usenet, etc etc ...
(i have gathered many many titles, but i only claim 2)
And I hail you again: "Long live King Bassos!".
Lazy ;)
Post by Mike_DuffyPost by BassosDo read the words of the dude i remind you off.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Book_of_the_Law
https://hermetic.com/crowley/libers/lib220
Maybe next winter. Maybe next week if it's raining.
At least you cannot claim you are unfamiliar with aleister crowley ;)
Just whatever it was he wrote :)